Skip to main content
PLOS ONE logoLink to PLOS ONE
. 2013 Jul 10;8(7):e69168. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0069168

De novo Assembly and Characterization of the Barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli) Transcriptome Using Next-Generation Pyrosequencing

Xia Yang 1, Xin-Yan Yu 1, Yong-Feng Li 1,*
Editor: Nicholas James Provart2
PMCID: PMC3707877  PMID: 23874903

Abstract

Background

Barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli) is an important weed that is a menace to rice cultivation and production. Rapid evolution of herbicide resistance in this weed makes it one of the most difficult to manage using herbicides. Since genome-wide sequence data for barnyardgrass is limited, we sequenced the transcriptomes of susceptible and resistant barnyardgrass biotypes using the 454 GS-FLX platform.

Results

454 pyrosequencing generated 371,281 raw reads with an average length of 341.8 bp, which made a total length of 126.89 Mb (SRX160526). De novo assembly produced 10,142 contigs (∼5.92 Mb) with an average length of 583 bp and 68,940 singletons (∼22.13 Mb) with an average length of 321 bp. About 244,653 GO term assignments to the biological process, cellular component and molecular function categories were obtained. A total of 6,092 contigs and singletons with 2,515 enzyme commission numbers were assigned to 151 predicted KEGG metabolic pathways. Digital abundance analysis using Illumina sequencing identified 78,124 transcripts among susceptible, resistant, herbicide-treated susceptible and herbicide-treated resistant barnyardgrass biotypes. From these analyses, eight herbicide target-site gene groups and four non-target-site gene groups were identified in the resistant biotype. These could be potential candidate genes involved in the herbicide resistance of barnyardgrass and could be used for further functional genomics research. C4 photosynthesis genes including RbcS, RbcL, NADP-me and MDH with complete CDS were identified using PCR and RACE technology.

Conclusions

This is the first large-scale transcriptome sequencing of E. crus-galli performed using the 454 GS-FLX platform. Potential candidate genes involved in the evolution of herbicide resistance were identified from the assembled sequences. This transcriptome data may serve as a reference for further gene expression and functional genomics studies, and will facilitate the study of herbicide resistance at the molecular level in this species as well as other weeds.

Introduction

Barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli [L.] Beauv.) is one of the main problematic grass weeds that grows along with important staple crops such as rice [1]. During cultivation even when the ratio of rice plants to barnyardgrass is 10∶1 rice biomass is reduced by 75% and yield by about 50% [2]. Many herbicides are being used to destroy barnyardgrass which in turn would improve rice production. However, persistent use of herbicides results in rapid development of herbicide resistance [3][4]. In the last two decades, it has been reported that E. crus-galli worldwide has developed resistance to nine herbicide groups: ALS inhibitors (e.g. penoxsulam, bispyribac-sodium), ACCase inhibitors (e.g. cyhalofop-butyl), synthetic auxin (e.g. quinclorac), photosystem II (e.g. atrazine), ureas and amides (inhibition of photosynthesis at photosystem II, e.g. propanil), dinitroanilines (microtubule assembly inhibition, e.g. pendimethalin), thiocarbamates (inhibition of lipid synthesis, e.g. thiobencarb), chloroacetamides (inhibition of cell division, e.g. butachlor) and isoxazolidinoes (inhibition of carotenoid biosynthesis, e.g. clomazone) [4][8]. The increasing resistance of E. crus-galli to herbicides has drastically threatened rice production and alternate weed management strategies should be considered during the cultivation of direct-seeded rice. Therefore, an understanding of the fundamental molecular mechanisms behind development of herbicide resistance is necessary to minimize and manage resistance development, and increase crop yield [3][4].

Recent advances in genomic sequencing technologies are radically changing biological research, and will also have a major impact on crop improvement [9][11]. However, genomics and bioinformatics studies on the rapidly evolving weeds of modern agriculture are limited [12]. Therefore, developing new genomics resources is necessary to study the troublesome weeds in crop fields.

In recent years, the next generation sequencing (NGS) technologies have enabled inexpensive and quick generation of large-scale sequence data when compared to conventional Sanger sequencing [9], [13]. The 454 pyrosequencing technology has been used to analyze the transcriptome of grass species such as Brachypodium distachyon, waterhemp (A. tuberculatus), horseweed (C. canadenisis), grain amaranth (A. hypochondriacus), 11 composite weeds and switchgrass (Panicum virgatum) [14][19]. Besides obtaining the transcriptomic data from these species, some candidate genes potentially involved in herbicide resistance have also been analyzed. The preliminary sequence data for all of the major target-site genes such as 4-hydroxyphenylpyruvate dioxygenase and glutamine synthetase were obtained in A. tuberculatus [15]. The functions of ABC transporters involved in non-target glyphosate resistance in C. canadenisis were demonstrated by real-time PCR experiments [16]. These data indicate that 454 GS-FLX pyrosequencing is a powerful tool for the development of genomic resources for functional genomics on grasses. They would also potentially benefit future research efforts in weed science.

To increase the genomic resources for weeds, we sequenced the trancriptomes of the susceptible and resistant biotypes of barnyardgrass (E. crus-galli) using the 454 GS-FLX platform. The data were assembled de novo followed by sequence annotation and clustering into putative functional categories using the Gene Ontology (GO) framework and grouping into pathways using the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) database. Moreover, transcript abundance analysis was performed using Illumina sequencing and the observed differences between the resistant and susceptible E. crus-galli biotypes are presented here. Then, potential candidate sequences involved in the development of herbicide resistance were also analyzed. Finally, C4 photosynthesis genes including RbcS, RbcL, NADP-me and MDH with complete CDS were identified using PCR and RACE technology.

De novo sequence assembly was then performed, which involved comparison of sequences, finding overlapping fragment pairs and merging as many fragments as possible to create a consensus sequence [27]. This assembly resulted in 10,142 contigs (∼5.92 Mb) with an average length of 583 bp and 68,940 singletons (∼22.13 Mb) with an average length of 321 bp (Table 1). The length distribution of all assembled contigs and singletons is shown in Fig. 3. About 9,432 contigs and 64,272 singletons were >100 bp, 5,103 (50.32%) contigs were longer than 500 bp and 2,935 (28.94%) were longer than 700 bp. The longest contig and singleton was 6,708 and 878 bp respectively. The N50 value for the contigs was 900 bp and represents the contig length of half of the total contigs.

Table 1. Summary of barnyardgrass 454 transcriptome sequencing, assembly and annotation.

Reads (n) Bases (Mb) Average length (bp)
454 raw reads 371,281 126.89 341
Assembled contigs 10,142 5.92 583
Singletons 68,940 22.13 321
Annotated sequences 45,438 18.92 416
Sequences assigned with GO terms 40,399 17.03 421
Sequences assigned with EC numbers 12,846 5.72 445

Figure 3. Sequence length distribution of assembled contigs (A) and singletons (B) from the barnyardgrass 454 transcriptome.

Figure 3

Materials and Methods

We promise that no specific permissions were required for the barnyardgrass species in the described locations in this manuscript, and the field studies did not involve endangered or protected species.

Plant Materials and Growth

Barnyardgrass (E. crus-galli) seeds from susceptible and resistant biotypes were collected from the rice field at Lu-jiang county in An-hui province, China. Before the experiments, this resistant biotype was first confirmed to be resistant to quinclorac (inhibitor of synthetic auxin and also inhibitor of cell wall), penoxsulam (ALS inhibitor) and bispyribac-sodium (ALS inhibitor) group of herbicides (Fig. 1). For this, the seeds were sterilized in 3% NaClO for 10 min, washed three times with tap water and allowed to germinate at 30°C. These germinating seeds were then planted in plastic pots, filled with a 2∶1:1 mixture of soil: peat: sand in a climate chamber at 28°C/25°C (day/night) with a 16 h photoperiod. Three weeks later, leaves from the susceptible and resistant biotype seedlings were treated with 1.143 mg/ml quinclorac (BASF AG, German), 4.114 mg/ml penoxsulam (Dow AgroSciences, USA) and 3.429 mg/ml bispyribac-sodium (Jiangsu Institute of Ecomones Co., LTD, China). After 24 h of spraying, both treated and untreated seedlings were harvested and immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at −80°C until RNA extraction.

Figure 1. The growth of resistant (R) and susceptible (S) barnyardgrass biotypes at various concentrations of the herbicides quinclorac (A), bispyribac-sodium (B) and penoxsulam (C).

Figure 1

The dose of each herbicide is in µmol.

RNA Isolation and cDNA Library Construction

Total RNA from the seedlings was extracted using Trizol reagent (Invitrogen, USA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. RNA quantity and quality were analyzed using gel electrophoresis and Nanodrop 2000 spectrophotometer (Nanodrop, USA). cDNA library construction was performed at Shanghai Majorbio Bio-pharm Biotechnology Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). Briefly, Oligo-dT beads were used to isolate poly(A+) mRNA from a total RNA pool consisting of equal quantities of total RNA from three sample types: untreated susceptible barnyardgrass, untreated resistant barnyardgrass and herbicide-treated resistant barnyardgrass. Then, mRNA was converted into cDNA using the SMART cDNA synthesis kit (Clontech, USA) with a modified 3′ primer containing a BsgI site (5′-ATTCTAGAGGCCGAGGCGTGCAG d(T)18 VN-3′). The newly synthesized cDNA were treated with BsgI enzyme to remove the poly (A) tails, fragmented, blunt ended and ligated with the customized 454 adaptors (A and B) to form the single-stranded cDNA library for emulsion PCR amplification and Roche GS-FLX 454 sequencing.

454 Sequencing, Assembly and Annotation

The cDNA pool representing untreated susceptible barnyardgrass, untreated resistant barnyardgrass and herbicide-treated resistant barnyardgrass was used for high throughput sequencing using the 454 GS-FLX platform (Roche, USA). A half-plate run was performed at the Shanghai Majorbio Bio-pharm Biotechnology Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China) following the manufacturer’s protocol. GS de novo assembler (Newbler v2.3, Roche) was used for 454 sequencing assembly. For similarity searches, all assembled contigs and singletons were compared with the proteins in the NCBI non-redundant (nr) protein database using BLASTx [20]. The BLAST E-value threshold was set at 1×10−5, with a minimum alignment length of 60 bp. To determine gene functions of the sequences, these results were imported to Blast2GO, a software that retrieves gene ontology (GO) terms [21]. GO terms were determined with respect to Cellular Component, Biological Process and Molecular Function. Kyoto Encyclopaedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathways were assigned to the assembled sequences and Enzyme Commission (EC) numbers were used to automatically color and retrieve KEGG pathway maps [22]. The assembled sequences were mapped to the KEGG biochemical pathways according to the enzyme distribution in the pathway database. InterPro annotations were performed using InterProScan (http://www.ebi.ac.uk/Tools/InterProScan/).

Illumina Sequencing and Digital Expression Analysis

Oligo-dT beads were used to yield poly(A+) mRNA from a total RNA pool consisting of equal quantities of total RNA from four sample types: untreated susceptible barnyardgrass, herbicide-treated susceptible barnyardgrass, untreated resistant barnyardgrass and herbicide-treated resistant barnyardgrass. Then, mRNA bound to the beads was converted into first-strand cDNA using oligo-dT and second-strand cDNA using random primers. Paired-ended (PE) library with approximate 200 bp fragment was synthesized using the Genomic DNA Sample Prep Kit (Illumina, USA) according to the manufacuter’s instructions. PE library products were sequenced on the Illumina Genome Analyzer II platform equipped with a paired-end module according to the manufacturer’s instruction. Then the PE reads were assembled using ABySS assembler tool [23]. The sequences were aligned to the assembled contigs and singletons using the bowtie software [24]. The expressions of each reads between sample pairs (untreated susceptible barnyardgrass VS herbicide-treated susceptible barnyardgrass, untreated resistant barnyardgrass VS herbicide-treated resistant barnyardgrass) were calculated using the numbers of reads with a specific match. Among the four samples, a minimum of a two-fold difference in log2 expression were considered as expression differences. Genes with different expression were identified using R package DEGseq with MARS (MA-plot-based method with random sampling Model) [25].

Data Availability

All the reads generated in 454 pyrosequencing and Illumina sequencing were deposited in the NCBI Sequence Read Archive (SRA) under the accession number SRX160526.

Quantitative Real-time PCR Analysis

Quantitative real-time PCR analysis of two candidate genes, ALS and ACCase, was performed using gene specific primers. ALS primers were 5′-GCCTTCCAGGAGACGCCAATCG-3′ and 5′-GGTCATCTCCACAAAGCGGCACA-3′. ACCase primers were 5′-GCTGCGTGGAGGAGCTTGGG-3′ and 5′-CACCTTTAGCTGCCATTCTGAGGGA-3′. The β-actin gene was used as an internal control. The primers used to amplify β-actin were 5′-CACACTGGTGTTATGGTAGG-3′ and 5′-AGAAGGTGTGATGCCAAAT-3′. Real-time PCR was performed using SYBR® Premix Ex Taq™ kit (TaKaRa, Japan) on a ABI-7500 Fast Real-Time PCR System (ABI, USA). About 2µl cDNA from each of the four samples (untreated and herbicide-treated susceptible barnyardgrass, untreated and herbicide-treated resistant barnyardgrass) was mixed with 0.2 µM primers, 1×ROX Reference Dye II and SYBR® Premix Ex Taq™ (including TaKaRa Ex Taq HS, dNTP mixture, Mg2+ and SYBR Green I) in a final volume of 20 µl. The amplification program was as follows: 30 s at 95°C for denaturation followed by 40 cycles of 3 s at 95°C and 30 s at 60°C. Each experiment had three independent repetitions. Values were presented as mean ± SD of three independent RT-PCR analysis. Error bars were calculated based on values from three replicates. Relative expression of the target genes to the β-actin control was calculated using the 2−△△CT method [26].

Results and Discussion

454 Sequencing and de novo Assembly

We performed 454 pyrosequencing of the barnyardgrass (E. crus-galli) cDNA to identify target genes for functional genome studies. Our choice to sequence the transcriptome was based on the difficulty in sequencing the polyploid barnyardgrass genome by whole genome sequencing. A pooled cDNA library from three samples (untreated susceptible biotype, untreated resistant biotype and herbicide-treated resistant biotype) was run on a half-plate using the 454 GS-FLX Titanium Chemistry to obtain sequences of low- and high- abundance transcripts. This biotype-treatment combo could produce the transcripts related to herbicide resistance, herbicide-treated susceptible biotype was therefore absent in this 454 pyrosequencing,. This generated 371,281 raw reads with an average length of 341.8 bp and a total length of 126.89 Mb (Table 1). Sequence length distribution of raw reads is shown in Fig. 2.

Figure 2. Distribution of the raw read sequence lengths from the barnyardgrass 454 transcriptome.

Figure 2

Sequence Annotation

In order to identify new E. crus-galli specific sequences, all 79,082 assembled sequences (10,142 contigs and 68,940 singletons) were used as queries to search the NCBI nr protein database using BLASTx followed by analysis using Blast2GO. In total 45,438 assembled sequences including 7,407 (73.03%) contigs and 38,031 (55.17%) singletons were annotated. The remaining 44.83% singletons and 26.97% contigs were not annotated presumably due to their short average lengths. Average length of the annotated contigs was 690 bp, while that of non-annotated contigs was only 260 bp. The average length of annotated singletons was 360 bp, while that of non-annotated singletons was 272 bp.

In these annotations, only 24 sequences were hits to proteins from the Echinochloa species while 23,657 (52.06%) were hits to proteins from Sorghum bicolor; 9,584 (21.09%) to Zea mays; 7,718 (16.99%) to Oryza sativa and 1,764 (3.88%) to Hordeum vulgare. Such low numbers of proteins from barnyardgrass is most likely due to the absence of a well annotated reference genome for the species. Almost half of the sequences (42.54%) assembled in this study could not be annotated by searching the NCBI nr protein database. Absence of sufficient sequences from species phylogenetically close to barnyardgrass in the public databases could have also contributed to the high percentage of non-annotated sequences. These non-annotated sequences could be resourceful for pursuing taxon-guided searches of specific genes of interest [15].

GO terms were assigned to the annotated EST sequences using Blast2GO. One or more GO terms were assigned to 40,399 (51.09%) sequences with 244,653 GO assignments in total for the biological process, cellular component and molecular function categories. These three groups were not mutually exclusive because many contigs were assigned to more than one type of GO term. The largest proportion was represented by the cellular process (GO: 0009987; 25.16%) and metabolic process (GO: 0008152; 25.05%) under biological process, cell (GO: 0005623; 31.40%), cell part (GO: 0044464; 31.40%) and organelle (GO:0043226; 25.40%) under cellular component, and binding (GO: 0005488; 44.36%) and catalytic activity (GO: 0003824; 38.66%) under molecular function (Fig. 4). Representation of 56 GO terms in the transcriptome provided an indication of the diversity of genes expressed in E. crus-galli. Similar results were reported for the biological process category in Conyza canadensis, while the predominant subgroups in molecular function (enzyme activity and transferase activity) and cellular component (intracellular components and cytoplasmic components) are different from our data [16]. To our interests were the GO terms related to herbicidal mechanisms: response to auxin stimulus (152), photosystem II (114), cellulose biosynthetic process (106), lipid catabolic process synthesis (95), acetyl-CoA biosynthetic process (65), carotenoid biosynthetic process (37) and acetolactate synthase activity (6). Quinclorac used in our study is an inhibitor of synthetic auxin (acting like indolylacetic acid) and also an inhibitor of cell wall (cellulose) biosynthesis [4]. About 51 sequences under auxin response factor and 28 sequences under cellulose synthase were obtained. These sequences could be further investigated to determine their specific function in the evolution of herbicide resistance in E. crus-galli.

Figure 4. Functional annotation of assembled sequences based on gene ontology (GO) terms.

Figure 4

GO analysis was performed at level 2 for the three main categories (biological process, cellular component and molecular function).

Functional Classification by KEGG

In addition, KEGG pathways were assigned to all 79,082 assembled sequences by comparing to the KEGG database using BLASTx with an E-value cutoff of <1×10−5. A total of 6,092 contigs and singletons with 2,515 enzyme commission (EC) numbers were assigned to 151 predicted KEGG metabolic pathways and the numbers of barnyardgrass sequences in the different pathways ranged from 1 to 4,424. This analysis showed that 4,424 sequences were present in the major metabolic pathways and 1,865 in the biosynthesis of secondary metabolites. The sequences represented in the metabolic pathways of major bio-molecules included purine, starch and sucrose, terpenoids and steroids, methane, pyrimidine, phenylalanine, amino sugar and nucleotide sugar, glycerophospholipid, glycerolipid, etc. About 894 sequences with 109 EC numbers were mapped to the biosynthesis of plant hormones pathway. In the metabolism pathway, we found seven sequences assigned to acetolactate synthase (ALS, EC 2.2.1.6), which is the target for herbicides, penoxsulam and bispyribac-sodium. When these sequences were compared in the NCBI nr database using BLASTx, only two (contig05544 and G81ESPA01CWAJO) sequences were found to be highly similar (99% and 99%) to ALS genes from Echinochloa phyllopogon [28], while the remaining five (contig03089, contig06883, contig08547, G81ESPA01BLGZC and G81ESPA01ECFXF) were annotated to hypothetical proteins of unknown function.

Illumina Sequencing and Digital Expression Analysis

To identify large scale differences in gene expression of susceptible and resistant barnyardgrass, quantitative transcriptome analysis using Illumina Genome Analyzer II was performed. It produced quantitative expression scores, which should be accurate and highly consistent with other quantitative methods such as quantitative RT-PCR [29]. A mixed cDNA pool from four samples (untreated and herbicide-treated susceptible barnyardgrass, untreated and herbicide-treated resistant barnyardgrass) was sequenced using Illumina. This yielded 2.8 GB data with 14,769,229, 14,610,811, 12,341,146 and 15,099,517 assembled paired-ended reads respectively. These transcripts were mapped to the assembled sequences from 454 pyrosequencing and those that were mapped successfully were further used to determine and compare the expression profiles of the transcripts in the four samples. Digital expression analysis identified a total of 78,124 sequences from 454 pyrosequencing including 9,737 contigs and 68,387 singletons showing significant abundance differences between sample pairs (untreated susceptible barnyardgrass VS herbicide-treated susceptible barnyardgrass, untreated resistant barnyardgrass VS herbicide-treated resistant barnyardgrass) (Fig. 5). The expression of many non-annotated genes with unknown function was revealed in this digital gene expression analysis. Thus this transcriptome could be a potentially rich source of genetic material for the systematic discovery of genes involved in the mechanisms of herbicide resistance [17].

Figure 5. Scatter plot analysis of two sample pairs (sc VS st, rc VS rt) from barnyardgrass.

Figure 5

sc: untreated susceptible biotype; st: herbicide-treated susceptible biotype; rc: untreated resistant biotype; rt: herbicide-treated resistant biotype. Log2 transformed read counts of the mapped contigs and singletons were used for comparison.

In the digital gene expression analysis, we found that asparagines synthetase 2 had the highest expression in the herbicide-treated resistant barnyardgrass. The top 10 annotated sequences with highest expression level in the barnyardgrass transcriptome are listed in Table 2. Except sucrose synthase, the other nine genes had higher expression in herbicide-treated resistant barnyardgrass than in herbicide-treated susceptible barnyardgrass biotype. Metallothionein-like protein, elongation factor, acetyl-coenzyme A carboxylase, light-induced protein 1 and pyruvate orthophosphate dikinase had higher expression levels in the herbicide-treated resistant barnyardgrass than the untreated resistant barnyardgrass biotype. In addition, the expression levels of these genes were lower in the herbicide-treated susceptible barnyardgrass and lowest in the untreated susceptible barnyardgrass biotype. Functional analysis of these genes will be conducted in future to determine the relationship between these genes and herbicide resistance.

Table 2. The top 15 genes with highest expression levels in the transcriptome data.

No. Sequence ID Annotation Digital expression
SC ST RC RT
1 contig04556 asparagines synthetase 2 8,433 6,834 108,302 50,444
2 contig04555 asparagines synthetase 2 5,984 4,222 74,988 39,573
3 contig06106 glycine-rich RNA-binding protein 2 7,229 4,267 20,464 18,167
4 contig07670 metallothionein-like protein 9,599 498 10,924 16,650
5 contig03094 light-induced protein 1-like 15,289 4,400 14,736 14,398
6 contig04500 sucrose synthase 1 7,879 13,895 8,938 12,881
7 contig00684 pyruvate orthophosphate dikinase 22,739 7,861 5,464 12,814
8 contig00581 elongation factor 15,557 6,714 11,676 12,365
9 contig04470 acetyl-coenzyme A carboxylase 16,114 2,472 12,989 12,088
10 contig05353 light-induced protein 1-like 11,779 3,203 13,083 11,876

Comparison of the Sequences Involved in Herbicide Resistance

The candidate genes involved in herbicide resistance were obtained by comparing our transcriptome (454) with the trascriptomes of waterhemp [15], horseweed [16] and grain amaranth [17]. The comparison of eleven herbicide target gene families and four non-target gene families is presented in Table 3. More glutamine synthetase (16) and phytoene desaturase (7) transcripts from the herbicide target gene families were identified in barnyardgrass than in the other three species. Notable absence in the barnyardgrass transcriptome were 4-hydroxyphenylpyruvate dioxygenase, protophenylpyruvate dioxygenase and D1 protein. The reason of such absence could be due to similar expression patterns between the susceptible and resistant biotypes. From our analysis we could conclude that 215 assembled sequences could be involved in the evolution of herbicide resistance. Since there is no reference genome to assemble these short reads into scaffolds and these 215 sequences could be redundant, the actual number of genes could be less than 215. In future work, we will focus on the functional analysis of these candidate genes.

Table 3. Comparison of the herbicide target gene families and non-target gene families from transcriptome of barnyardgrass, waterhemp, horseweed and grain amaranth.

Barnyardgrass Waterhemp Horseweed Grain amaranth
Herbicide target gene family
tubulin 25 33 29 34
glutamine synthetase 16 7 9 11
acetyl-CoA carboxylase 8 8 6 13
phytoene desaturase 7 1 5 2
1-deoxy-D-xylulose-5-phosphate synthase 3 1 6 3
5-enolpyruvylshikimate-3-phosphate synthase 2 3 2 1
acetolactate synthase 2 2 6 5
dihydropteroate synthase 1 2 1 1
4-hydroxyphenylpyruvate dioxygenase 0 2 1 3
protoporphyrinogen oxidase 0 8 2 5
D1 protein (plastidic gene) 0 2 4 2
Non-target gene family
cytochrome P450 monooxygenase 36 191 125
glycosyltransferase 31 84 76
ABC transporter genes 64 192 151
glutathione S-transferase 19 22 7

Microtubules are polymers of α-tubulin and β-tubulin dimers and play an important role in many essential cellular processes including mitosis, cytokinesis and vesicular transport [3]. The digital expression of 24 tubulin genes including α-tubulin and β-tubulin was much higher in the herbicide-treated resistant biotype (RT) than the herbicide-treated susceptible biotype (ST) of E. crus-galli, except one α-tubulin gene (G81ESPA01BDRNJ) and three β-tubulin genes (G81ESPA01CF9IL, G81ESPA01BZVDB and G81ESPA01BQRNR) with lower expression (Table 4). After treatment with herbicides, the digital expression levels of tubulin genes in the susceptible biotype (ST) declined when compared with untreated susceptible biotype (SC). However, the digital expressions of tubulin genes in the resistant biotype remained the same or declined below the susceptible biotype. The microtubule growth was more disrupted in the susceptible biotype than in the resistant biotype after the herbicide treatment. Tubulin genes play an important role in herbicide induced growth inhibition. For instance, in goosegrass (Eleusine indica), nucleotide differences were observed in the three α-tubulin genes between resistant (R) and susceptible (S) biotypes, although missense mutations were not present in any of the four β-tubulin genes in the two R-biotype lines [30], [31]. This indicated the possible association between these missense mutations in the α-tubulin genes and herbicide resistance in goosegrass. Similar results were found between the resistant and sensitive biotypes of green foxtail (Setaria viridis L. Beauv.) [32]. Therefore, the isolation and functional analysis of the full-length α-tubulin and β-tubulin genes from barnyardgrass is necessary to understand the mechanisms of herbicide resistance. Acetyl-CoA carboxylase (ACCase, EC 6.4.1.2) is a key enzyme in lipid biosynthesis that catalyzes the formation of malonyl-CoA from acetyl-CoA [3]. Similar to tubulin genes, the digital expression of eight ACCase genes also showed higher expression in the resistant biotype than in the susceptible biotype after herbicide treatment (Table 5). Two ACCase belonging to E. crus-galli biotype Geqiushan-S (HQ395758) and Geqiushan-R (HQ395759) were found in NCBI. These genes shared 96% identity with contig04470 and no significant similarity with contig04540. Further studies on the ACCase genes in barnyardgrass are needed to compare the differences among these genes, and determine their role in herbicide resistance. Penoxsulam and bispyribac-sodium herbicides, which were used in our study, were ALS-inhibiting herbicides [33]. In the barnyardgrass transcriptome and digital expression analysis, higher levels of ALS sequences (contig05544 and G81ESPA01CWAJO) were present in the resistant biotype than in the susceptible biotype after treatment with herbicides (Table 6). Based on real-time PCR experiments, the relative expression of ACCase and ALS genes were analyzed in each untreated and herbicide-treated biotype. Compared to herbicide treated susceptible plants, ALS and ACCase were highly expressed in herbicide treated resistant plants. The expressions of ALS and ACCase genes decreased when the susceptible biotype was treated with herbicides. However, the expression of ACCase declined slightly and ALS increased slightly in the herbicide-treated resistant biotype (Fig. 6). This trend was consistent with the expression profiles of ALS and ACCase sequences in the transcriptome. These genes are therefore regarded as good preliminary targets for further functional studies of herbicide resistance.

Table 4. Sequence ID, annotation, hit size and digital expression profile of tubulin genes in barnyardgrass (E. crus-galli).

No. Sequence ID Annotation Hitsize (bp) Digitalexpression
SC ST RC RT
1 contig02007 α-tubulin 447 4,561 429 5,173 5,029
2 contig02008 α-tubulin 935 10,817 1,185 8,054 7,396
3 contig02010 α-tubulin 935 9,359 1,043 7,354 7,069
4 contig02031 α-tubulin 911 6,782 890 5,483 6,575
5 contig02033 α-tubulin 309 1,276 190 1,147 1,266
6 contig02034 α-tubulin 330 1,252 221 1,253 1,502
7 contig04855 α-tubulin 1,461 4,939 1,449 2,076 3,832
8 contig04932 α-tubulin 1,364 3,400 1,509 5,048 3,828
9 G81ESPA01D3IDY α-tubulin 439 1,203 209 921 1,141
10 G81ESPA01BB9ZQ α-tubulin 364 1,304 167 839 814
11 G81ESPA01AXQ2P α-tubulin 129 1,489 232 1,288 1,270
12 G81ESPA01BU5X0 α-tubulin 305 1,084 191 888 1,097
13 G81ESPA01DWSAD α-tubulin 387 1,206 224 517 560
14 G81ESPA01D0ZJ4 α-tubulin 461 1,609 228 1,042 1,034
15 G81ESPA01D6KVH α-tubulin 366 258 217 358 275
16 G81ESPA01AG82W α-tubulin 181 1,350 220 1,181 1,138
17 G81ESPA01BDRNJ α-tubulin 349 1 2 6 3
18 contig00720 β-tubulin 415 508 185 849 491
19 contig00721 β-tubulin 603 2,198 270 1,597 1,517
20 contig00723 β-tubulin 681 1,514 123 837 1,126
21 contig00724 β-tubulin 939 2,136 591 2,308 1,695
22 contig00725 β- tubulin 789 1,608 603 1,347 1,127
23 G81ESPA01CF9IL β- tubulin 291 112 18 42 53
24 G81ESPA01BZVDB β- tubulin 283 99 14 31 42
25 G81ESPA01BQRNR β- tubulin 161 67 12 23 27

SC: untreated susceptible biotype; ST: herbicide-treated susceptible biotype; RC: untreated resistant biotype; RT: herbicide-treated resistant biotype.

Table 5. Sequence ID, annotation, hit size and digital expression profile of acetyl-CoA carboxylase.

No. Sequence ID Hit size(bp) Digital expression
SC ST RC RT
1 contig04470 6,708 16,114 2,472 12,989 12,088
2 contig04540 2,225 2,903 1,495 1,379 1,515
3 G81ESPA01C7K8F 295 74 28 59 88
4 G81ESPA01EALO0 355 103 37 78 113
5 G81ESPA01DANWF 346 410 113 283 276
6 G81ESPA01D05V2 221 135 22 145 121
7 G81ESPA01CVZK6 301 350 50 263 242
8 G81ESPA01CW4DK 438 479 78 513 478

Table 6. Sequence ID, annotation, hit size and digital expression profile of acetolactate synthase.

No. SequenceID Annotation Hitsize (bp) Digitalexpression
SC ST RC RT
1 contig05544 acetolactate synthase 991 482 143 557 385
2 G81ESPA01CWAJ0 acetolactate synthase 409 233 28 271 235

Figure 6. Real-time PCR analysis of ALS and ACCase genes in the seedlings of barnyardgrass.

Figure 6

ALS: Acetolactate synthase; ACCase: Acetyl-CoA carboxylase; SC: untreated susceptible biotype; ST: herbicide-treated susceptible biotype; RC: untreated resistant biotype; RT: herbicide-treated resistant biotype. The β-actin gene was used as an internal control. Values represent mean ± SD. Error bars were calculated based on values from three replicates.

Comparison of the Genes in Echinochloa

About 26 assembled sequences had best hits to Echinochloa genes in the NCBI nr database and included ALS [34], ACCase [28], NADP-dependent malic enzyme (NADP-me), pyruvate orthophosphate dikinase (PPDK) [35], Rps3, maturase K (matK) [36], [37], phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase (PEPC) [38] and ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase large subunit (rbcL) [39]. These seven genes were obtained from different varieties of Echinochloa including E. phyllopogon, E. frumentacea, E. colona, E. esculenta, E. muricata and E. oryzicola, in addition to E. crus-galli (Table 7). According to our barnyardgrass transcriptome data, C4 photosynthesis genes with complete coding sequence (CDS) including ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase small subunit (rbcS) (KC478601), rbcL (KC478602), NADP-me (KC478603) and malate dehydrogenase (MDH) (JX683695) were identified from E. crus-galli using PCR and RACE technology. These genes in general will be benefit future genomic and phylogenetic studies of grasses. Functional analysis of these genes is necessary to understand the evolution of C4 photosynthesis during angiosperm diversification and phylogenetic patterns in grasses [38], [40].

Table 7. A list of Echinochloa genes with homology to barnyardgrass sequences.

Echinochloa Gene NCBI accession number
E. crus-galli ALS JQ319776, JX415268JX415271[34]
ACCase AY763585, AH014492, AJ966453, AJ966423, AY762963, HQ395758, HQ395759
NADP-me FJ603315, FJ644948
PPDK DQ083757
Rps3 FJ766298, FJ766300
matK HM850573, HQ593274, HQ599953, HQ599954, HQ599962
PEPC AY251482, AY995212
rbcL HQ590071
E. phyllopogon ALS AB636580, AB636581[28]
ACCase AB636582AB636588[28]
E. frumentacea PPDK AY792619, AB289641[35]
E. colona matK HM850572[36]
E. esculenta matK AF164422[37]
PEPC AM690215[38]
rcbL EF125128[39]
E. muricata matK HQ593275, HQ596677
rcbL HQ590072
E. oryzicola Rps3 FJ766299

Conclusions

The susceptible and resistant biotypes of E. crus-galli, with and without treatment with three herbicides, were used to generate the first large-scale transcriptome sequencing data using the 454 GS-FLX platform. De novo assembly and functional annotation of the assembled contigs and singletons were performed using Newbler. Interestingly, eight herbicide target-site gene groups and four non-target-site gene groups were identified in the resistant biotype of E. crus-galli that would enable isolation of the full-length genes, which could be involved in herbicide resistance. These genes could also be used for further functional genomics research. Compared to the previously Echinochloa reported genes, four additional genes including RbcS, RbcL, NADP-me and MDH with complete CDS were identified using PCR and RACE technology. This study provides a valuable genetic resource for grasses in general and should be useful for weed control which should result in an improvement in agriculture.

Funding Statement

This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 30971926), Special Fund for Agro-scientific Research in the Public Interest (No. 201303031) and Jiangsu Agriculture Science and Technology Innovation Fund (No. CX(12)1003 ). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Chauhan BS, Abugho SB (2012) Effect of growth stage on the efficacy of postemergence herbicides on four weed species of direct-seeded rice. ScientificWorldJournal doi:10.1100/2012/123071 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 2. He HB, Wang HB, Fang CX, Lin ZH, Yu ZM, et al. (2012) Separation of allelopathy from resource competition using rice/barnyardgrass mixed-cultures. PLos One 7: e37201. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Powles SB, Yu Q (2010) Evolution in action: plant resistant to herbicides. Annu Rev Plant Biol 61: 317–347. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Heap I [April 29, 2013] International Survey of Herbicide Resistant Weeds [Online]. Available: http://www.weedscience.org.
  • 5. Malik MS, Burgos NR, Talbert RE (2010) Confirmation and control of propanil-resistant and quinclorac-resistant barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli) in rice. Weed Tech 24: 226–233. [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Yu X, Ge L, Liu L, Li Y (2010) Resistance of barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli) to multiple herbicides in direct-seeded rice. J Agri Sci 26: 1438–1440. [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Rahman MM, Bin SI, Juraimi AS (2010) Study on resistant biotypes of Echinochloa crus-galli in Malaysia. Aust J Crop Sci 4: 107–115. [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Juliano LM, Casimero MC, Llewellyn R (2010) Multiple herbicide resistance in barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli) in direct-seeded rice in the Philippines. Int J Pest Manage 56: 299–307. [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Varshney RK, Nayak SN, May GD, Jackson SA (2009) Next-generation sequencing technologies and their implications for crop genetics and breeding. Trends Biotechnol 27: 522–530. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Mochida K, Shinozaki K (2010) Genomics and bioinformatics resources for crop improvement. Plant Cell Physiol 51: 497–523. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Edwards D, Batley J (2010) Plant genome sequencing: applications for crop improvement. Plant Biotechnol J 8: 2–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Duke SO, Gressel J (2010) Weed genomics advance: a commentary. Pest Manag Sci 66: 1041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Ozsolak F, Milos PM (2011) RNA sequencing: advances, challenges and opportunities. Nat Rev Genet 12: 87–98. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. International Brachypodium Initiative (2010) Genome sequencing and analysis of the model grass Brachypodium distachyon . Nature 463: 763–768. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Riggins CW, Peng Y, Stewart CN, Tranel PJ (2010) Characterization of de novo transcriptome for waterhemp (Amaranthus tuberculatus) using GS-FLX 454 pyrosequencing and its application for studies of herbicide target-site genes. Pest Manag Sci 66: 1042–1052. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Peng Y, Abercrombie LL, Yuan JS, Riggins CW, Sammons RD, et al. (2010) Characterization of the horseweed (Conyza canadensis) transcriptome using GS-FLX 454 pyrosequencing and its application for expression analysis of candidate non-target herbicide resistance genes. Pest Manag Sci 66: 1053–1062. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Délano-Frier JP, Avilés-Arnaut H, Casarrubias-Castillo K, Casique-Arroyo G, Castrillón-Arbeláez PA, et al. (2011) Transcriptomic analysis of grain amaranth (Amaranthus hypochondriacus) using 454 pyrosequencing: comparison with A. tuberculatus, expression profiling in stems and in response to biotic and abiotic stress. BMC Genomics 12: 363–380. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Lai Z, Kane NC, Kozik A, Hodgins KA, Dlugosch KM, et al. (2012) Genomics of Compositae weeds: EST libraries, microarrays, and evidence of introgression. Am J Bot 99: 209–218. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Wang Y, Zeng X, lyer NJ, Bryant DW, Mockler TC, et al. (2012) Exploring the Switchgrass Transcriptome Using Second-Generation Sequencing Technology. PloS One 7: e34225. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Johnson M, Zaretskaya I, Raytselis Y, Merezhuk Y, McGinnis S, et al. (2008) NCBI BLAST: a better web interface. Nucleic Acids Res 36: W5–W9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Götz S, Garcia-Gómez JM, Terol J, Williams TD, Nagaraj SH, et al. (2008) High-throughput functional annotation and data mining with the Blast2GO suite. Nucleic Acids Res 36: 3420–3435. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Moriya Y, Itoh M, Okuda S, Yoshizawa A, Kanehisa M (2007) KAAS: an automatic genome annotation and pathway reconstruction server. Nucleic Acids Res 35: W182–W185. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Birol I, Jackman SD, Nielsen CB, Qian JQ, Varhol R, et al. (2009) De novo transcriptome assembly with ABySS. Bioinformatics 25: 2872–2877. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Langmead B, Trapnell C, Pop M, Salzberg SL (2009) Ultrafast and memory-efficient alignment of short DNA sequences to the human genome. Genome Biology 10: R25. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Wang L, Feng Z, Wang X, Zhang X (2010) DEGseq: an R package for identifying differentially expressed genes from RNA-seq data. Bioinformatics 26: 136–138. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD (2001) Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2 method. Methods 25: 402–408. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Fredrik S, Joakim L (2000) Sequence analysis of genes and genomes. J Biotechnol 76: 1–31. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Iwakami S, Uchino A, Watanabe H, Yamasue Y, Inamura T (2012) Isolation and expression of genes for acetolactate synthase and acetyl-CoA carboxylase in Echinochloa phyllopogon, a polyploidy weed species. Pest Manag Sci 68: 1098–1106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Wilhelm BT, Landry JR (2009) RNA-seq-quantitative measurement of expression through massively parallel RNA-sequencing. Methods 48: 249–257. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Yammoto E, Zeng L, Baird WV (1998) α–tubulin missense mutations correlate with antimicrotubule drug resistance in Eleusine indica . Plant Cell 10: 29–308. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Yamamoto E, Baird WV (1999) Molecular characterization of four β-tubulin genes from dinitroaniline susceptible and resistant biotypes of Eleusine indica . Plant Mol Bio 39: 45–61. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Délye C, Menchari Y, Michel S, Darmency H (2004) Molecular bases for sensitivity to tubulin-binding herbicides in green foxtail. Plant Physiol 136: 3920–3932. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Pátek M (2005) Branched-chain amino acids. Microbiol Monogr 5: 129–162. [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Riar DS, Norsworthy JK, Srivastava V, Nandula V, Bond JA, et al. (2013) Physiological and molecular basis of acetolactate synthase-inhibiting herbicide resistance in barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli). J Agric Food Chem 61: 278–289. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Wang J, Li R (2008) Intergration of C4-specific PPDK gene of Echinochloa to C2 upland rice and its photosynthesis characteristics analysis. Afr J Biotechnol 7: 783–787. [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Schaefer H, Hardy OJ, Silva L, Barraclough TG, Savolainen V (2011) Testing Darwin’s naturalization hypothesis in the Azores. Ecol Lett 14: 389–396. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Hilu KW, Alice AL, Liang H (1999) Phylogeny of Poaceae inferred from matK sequences. Ann Mo Bot Gard 86: 835–851. [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Christin PA, Salamin N, Savolainen V, Duvall MR, Besnard G (2007) C4 photosynthesis evolved in grasses via parallel adaptive genetic changes. Curr Biol 17: 1241–1247. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Bouchenak-Khelladi Y, Verboom GA, Hodkinson TR, Salamin N, Francois O, et al. (2009) The origins and diversification of C4 grasses and savanna-adapted ungulates. Glob Chang Biol 15: 2397–2417. [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Christin PA, Samaritani E, Petitpierre B, Salamin N, Besnard G (2009) Evolutionary insights on C4 photosynthetic subtypes in grasses from genomics and phylogenetics. Genome Biol Evol 1: 221–230. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

All the reads generated in 454 pyrosequencing and Illumina sequencing were deposited in the NCBI Sequence Read Archive (SRA) under the accession number SRX160526.


Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

RESOURCES