Skip to main content
Eye logoLink to Eye
letter
. 2013 Apr 19;27(7):893. doi: 10.1038/eye.2013.68

Response to Shah et al

S Trikha 1,*, C Macgregor 1, M Jeffrey 1, J F Kirwan 1
PMCID: PMC3709390  PMID: 23598675

Sir,

We thank Shah et al1 for their interest in the Portsmouth Glaucoma Refinement Scheme.2 The scheme also uses Van Herick grading for anterior chamber depth—all patients with a Van Herick peripheral limbal anterior chamber depth of less than 25% of corneal thickness were referred to the virtual clinic for assessment by an ophthalmologist. Approximately 10% of all of those accepted from the Refinement Scheme virtual clinic to HES (from a total of 11 out of 100 referred to the virtual clinic, from our audit) were due to narrow angles suspected through Van Herick grading. Of these, 25% subsequently required laser peripheral iridotomy, slightly higher than the 17% positive predictive value, for the suggestion of occludable angles by an initial Van Herick test, outlined by Foster.3

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Shah B, Campbell P, Ford C, Goyal S, Lim KS. Re: The Portsmouth-based refinement scheme: a role for virtual clinics in the future. Eye. 2013;27 (7:892–893. doi: 10.1038/eye.2013.67. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Trikha S, Macgregor C, Jeffery M, Kirwan J. The Portsmouth-based refinement scheme: a role for virtual clinics in the future. Eye. 2012;26:1288–1294. doi: 10.1038/eye.2012.120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Foster P. Advances in the understanding of primary angle-closure as a cause of glaucomatous optic neuropathy. Commun Eye Health. 2001;14 (39:37–39. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Eye are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES