Skip to main content
BMC Pediatrics logoLink to BMC Pediatrics
. 2013 Jul 11;13:105. doi: 10.1186/1471-2431-13-105

Health related quality of life of obese adolescents in Kuwait

Shurooq A Boodai 1,, John J Reilly 2
PMCID: PMC3710478  PMID: 23845118

Abstract

Background

Obesity impairs health related quality of life (HRQL) in adolescents, but most evidence in this area has mostly come from western societies. We wanted to test the hypothesis that obesity impairs HRQL in Kuwaiti adolescents, and to test for differences in HRQL assessed by self-report and parent-proxy report.

Methods

In 500 Kuwaiti 10–14 year olds HRQL was assessed using the Peds QLTM with both adolescent self-reports (n = 500) and parent-proxy reports (n = 374).

Results

Obesity was not significantly associated with HRQL in regression analysis. In a paired comparison of 98 pairs of obese adolescents vs. 98 healthy weight peers, impairment of HRQL reached significance only for physical score (95% CI = −1.5, -9.4), not for psychosocial score or total score. In a paired comparison of parent-proxy vs. self-reports for the obese adolescents, total score (95% CI = −4.9, -10.9), physical score (95% CI = −3.2, -11.0), and psychosocial score (95% CI = −4.2, -10.8) were all significantly lower in the parent reports.

Conclusions

Obesity is not associated with marked impairment of HRQL in adolescents in Kuwait, in contrast to studies in western societies. This may reflect cultural differences in attitudes towards obesity.

Keywords: Obesity, Adolescent, Health-related quality of life

Background

It is now well established, from systematic review and meta-analysis, that obesity impairs health-related quality of life (HRQL) of children and adolescents from western societies [1,2]. There is much less evidence on the extent to which obesity might impair HRQL in adolescents from non-western societies [3-7], but obesity-associated impairment of HRQL has emerged in children, adolescents, and young adults in Malaysia, Taiwan, and Lebanon [3,5-7].

It has been suggested that the impact of child or adolescent obesity on HRQL is influenced by culture [3], but since the evidence base on impairment of HRQL in adolescents is still very limited in geographical scope the hypothesis that culture influences the obesity associated impairment of child or adolescent HRQL has not been tested. For example, it is not clear whether obesity impairs the HRQL of adolescents in the Arabian Gulf States. Deficits in HRQL may drive healthcare utilization by creating a demand for obesity treatment [8-10], and understanding the extent of these deficits in non-western societies is important. One complication is differences in perceptions of HRQL between adolescents and their parents [2,3,10]. The literature suggests that the older the child, the larger the level of disagreement between the self-report and proxy-report of HRQL [11,12]. A full understanding of the impact of obesity on HRQL therefore requires that both the parent proxy-reported and adolescent- reported HRQL are considered [11-17].

The primary purpose of the present study was therefore to test the hypothesis that obesity is associated with impaired HRQL in Kuwaiti adolescents, as in western societies. A secondary aim was to test whether HRQL differed between self-reports and parent-proxy reports for the obese adolescents.

Methods

Measurement of HRQL

The Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL™ 4.0, MAPI Research Institute, Lyon, France) was used in the present study, with the Arabic Generic Version. The PedsQL™ is a generic HRQL questionnaire that has both self- and parent-proxy report forms [16]. The forms are available in age-appropriate versions (5-7 years, 8-12 years and 13-18 years), and we used the version appropriate to the age of each study participant in the present study. The PedsQL™ 4.0 is well-established, has been used most commonly in studies of child and adolescent obesity [2], and is a valid and reliable tool which is responsive to clinical change over time [16,17]. The Arabic Generic version of the PedsQL™ used in the present study is valid and reliable, e.g. with internal consistency for the different scales of 0.88-0.92 [18].

The PedsQL™ measures a multidimensional construct that includes 23 items consisting of physical, emotional, social and school performance domains from which a total score, psychosocial score (composite of the emotional function, social function, and school function domains), and physical score are derived. Items are linearly transformed to a 0 to 100 scale, so that the higher the score, the better the HRQL.

Study participants

The sample was recruited from public (state) schools in Kuwait city, the capital of Kuwait. The original intention was to recruit adolescents from a random sample of public schools, but this proved not to be possible due to limited consent to participate from school head teachers. The Ministry of Education granted approval to the research team to invite all 80 intermediate schools in Kuwait City to participate in the study. Kuwait City has 41 male public intermediate schools and 39 female public intermediate schools. Only 10/80 intermediate school head teachers responded, from 3 girls schools and 7 boys schools, and of these 10, permission to conduct the study at school was granted by only three schools; two male and one female school. Participants and their families provided informed written consent. The PedsQL™4.0 Arabic version was completed independently by the adolescents at school and by their parents at home. The study was approved by the Medical Research Committee of the Ministry of Health and the Ethical Committee of the Ministry of Education in Kuwait.

Study participants were included if within the eligible age range (within grades 5–9, the grade range for intermediate schools, age 10 to 14y), and were either obese or healthy weight as defined below. Overweight pupils were excluded from the study sample in order to provide a marked contrast in weight status between the two groups of interest, and to minimize the impact of any mis-classification arising from use of the body mass index. Other exclusions were based on a brief medical history/checklist aimed at including only apparently healthy adolescents, and excluding participants with serious chronic or acute illness which might affect their HRQL.

Assessment of weight status and formation of obese-healthy weight matched pairs

From the three schools which agreed to participate, screening of weight status to determine eligibility was carried out in a total of 1042 pupils (542 boys, 500 girls). Pupils were categorised into healthy weight, overweight, and obese groups relative to reference data from the US CDC 2000 [19]. Obesity was defined as BMI ≥ 95th centile, overweight as BMI of ≥ 85th centile and <95th centile, healthy weight was defined as BMI ≥ 3rd centile and < 85th centile. The US BMI reference data were used in the present study because the absolute BMI values at standard Kuwaiti centiles are extremely high [20], as the Kuwaiti BMI reference was constructed after the obesity epidemic had affected Kuwait [21]. The total number of pupils who did not fulfill the inclusion criteria and/or did not consent was 542, 224 males and 318 females, leaving 500 eligible consenting participants, 318 boys and 182 girls.

A pre-planned paired analysis of HRQL between obese and healthy weight participants, with pair matching for same sex, same school, same school year, and same ethnic group (all participants were Kuwaiti nationals) yielded 98 pairs with 57 paired comparisons in boys and 41 paired comparisons in girls.

Statistical analysis

All statistical analyses were performed using Minitab 16.0. Data were checked for normality by descriptive statistics and histograms with normal distribution curves. Both the descriptive data, and differences between groups (e.g. between self versus parent reports) were non-normally distributed and so non-parametric statistical tests were used. For the whole sample self-reports, the skewness and kurtosis values for the physical score were −1.10 and 1.70 , for the psychosocial score these were −1.42 and 2.48 and for the total score they were −1.14 and 1.07 , respectively. For the parent-proxy reports, skewness and kurtosis values for the total score were −0.49 and −0.66, for the psychosocial score −0.44 and −0.51, and for the physical score were −0.84 and −0.30, respectively.

In order to test whether obesity was associated with impaired HRQL two statistical approaches were taken. First, multiple regression was used with HRQL (total score, physical score, and psychosocial score) as the outcome and age, gender, and weight status as the explanatory variables. Second, paired comparisons were undertaken between obese versus healthy weight study participants. Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were used to determine the significance of differences in the paired scores between the obese and the healthy weight groups. We also used Wilcoxon signed-rank tests to determine the significance of any difference in scores between adolescent self-reports and parent-proxy reports in the obese group.

Results

Sample characteristics

The final study sample consisted of 500 adolescents, 224 obese and 276 healthy weight, 318 boys (63.6%) and 182 girls (36.4%), median age 12.3y. Of the 500 adolescent participants self- reports were available from all 500, but parent-proxy reports were available from 162 of the obese group and 212 from the healthy-weight group. Characteristics of study participants are summarized in Table 1.

Table 1.

Characteristics of study participants, median (IQR)

Variable
Healthy weight group
Obese group
 
Boys
Girls
Total
Boys
Girls
Total
  n = 176 n = 100 n = 276 n = 142 n = 82 n = 224
Age
12.3 (2.2)
12.2 (2.3)
12.3 (2.2)
12.6 (1.8)
12.4 (2.1)
12.4 (2.0)
BMI (kg/m2)
18.0 (2.9)
18.2 (2.9)
18.1 (3.0)
28.7 (6.8)
29.3 (4.9)
28.8 (5.5)
BMI Z score
0.0 (1.2)
0.1 (1.0)
0.1 (1.1)
2.1 (0.4)
2.0 (0.4)
2.1 (0.4)
HRQL Self-report
 
 
 
 
 
 
Physical score
96.9 (15.6)
87.5 (19.7)
93.7 (18.8)
90.6 (21.9)
81.3 (28.9)
87.5 (25.0)
Psychosocial score
90.0 (21.6)
86.7 (23.4)
88.3 (20.0)
87.5 (18.4)
82.5 (21.6)
85.0 (18.3)
Total score
92.4 (19.5)
86.4 (20.6)
89.1 (20.3)
88.0 (18.4)
79.3 (21.2)
84.8 (21.2)
HRQL Parent-proxy report
n = 125
n = 87
n = 212
n = 91
n = 71
n = 162
Physical score
90.6 (25.0)
75.0 (43.7)
87.5 (34.4)
84.4 (31.3)
81.3 (43.8)
82.9 (34.4)
Psychosocial score
78.3 (25.0)
70.0 (28.4)
76.7 (26.7)
76.7 (20.0)
80.0 (29.9)
76.7 (25.0)
Total score 82.6 (22.3) 69.6 (31.6) 79.3 (29.3) 76.1 (21.7) 81.5 (29.3) 78.3 (25.3)

Test of the hypothesis that HRQL is impaired in the obese group: multiple regression analysis

Of the potential explanatory variables of age, gender, and weight status, only gender had a significant influence on adolescent self-reported HRQL (n = 500; significantly lower total score in girls than boys, p =0.02). In parent-proxy reports, age (lower in older than younger participants, p < 0.01) and gender (lower in girls than boys p < 0.01) had a significant impact on total score. There was no evidence that obesity was associated with impaired HRQL (total score, physical score, psychosocial score) in the regression analyses.

Test of the hypothesis that HRQL is impaired in the obese group: paired comparisons of obese versus healthy weight participant

Demographic information

Formal matched pairs were selected from the obese and healthy weight groups (n = 98 pairs). Median (IQR) ages of the healthy weight and obese groups were both 12.4 (2.1). Median (IQR) BMI Z scores were 0.1 (1.1) for the healthy weight group and 2.1 (0.4) for the obese group.

Self-reports

Summary data are shown in Table 2. There was no significant difference in the total score between groups (n =98 pairs), but the physical score for the healthy weight group was significantly higher than in the obese group.

Table 2.

Paired comparisons of Health Related Quality of Life (HRQL) for the healthy weight group vs. obese group, median (IQR)

 
Healthy weight group
Obese group
95% CI
P-value
Variable n = 98 n = 98    
Self-report
Median (IQR)
Median (IQR)
 
 
Physical score   
90.6 (18.7)
87.5 (31.2)
1.5, 9.4
0.007
Psychosocial score   
88.3 (18.3)
85.0 (20.4)
−1.6, 7.5
0.224
Total score   
88.0 (17.7)
84.8 (25.0)
−0.5, 7.1
0.087
Parent-proxy report
 
 
 
 
Physical score   
86.0 (40.6)
81.3 (31.3)
−4.7, 6.3
0.756
Psychosocial score   
76.7 (25.0)
76.7 (28.3)
−3.4, 5.8
0.773
Total score    79.3 (31.5) 78.8 (24.5) −2.8, 6.0 0.550

Median (IQR) ages of healthy weight and obese groups were both 12.4y (2.1). Median (IQR) BMI Z scores were 0.1 (1.1) for the healthy weight group, and 2.1 (0.4) for the obese group.

Parent-proxy reports

As shown in Table 2, there were no significant differences in the paired comparisons of parent-proxy reports between the obese group and healthy weight group.

Differences between self-reports and parent-proxy reports for the obese adolescents

There were 162 obese adolescents for the paired comparisons between self-reports and parent-proxy reports (median age = 12.4y, IQR =2.1). Parent-proxy reports were significantly lower than self-reports for physical score (95% CI = 3.2, 11.0), psychosocial score (95% CI = 4.2, 10.8), and total score (95% CI = 4.9, 10.9).

Discussion

The primary aim of the present study was to test whether the impairment of ‘total’ HRQL associated with obesity from western samples, as measured by the PedsQL™, [1,2] was present in a community sample of adolescents from Kuwait. The results do not suggest that obesity impairs total HRQL markedly in Kuwaiti adolescents, in contrast to findings from western samples [1,2] and some non-western samples [3-7].

The present study did find evidence of a deficit in the physical health domain of HRQL , but not for the psychosocial health domain .It is possible that the physical health effects of adolescent obesity might be more universal than psychosocial effects, Psychosocial effects of obesity might be more sensitive to cultural differences, e.g. in the perception of obesity. The apparent lack of impact of obesity on the psychosocial domain of HRQL in the present study might reflect cultural differences in the perception of obesity between Kuwait and western societies, but further research would be required to confirm this. The community-based nature of the sample might also have reduced any potential HRQL deficits associated with obesity. It is possible that HRQL is more greatly impaired in clinic based, treatment-seeking samples [5,6,8,9].

Recent systematic reviews have noted that almost all of the evidence reviewed has been from western countries [1,2]. Very recently, some evidence has begun to emerge from non-western societies [3-7] and this has generally supported the hypothesis that child or adolescent obesity is also associated with reduced HRQL in non-western cultures. The most relevant comparison to the present study is from studies using the PedsQL™ in Arab countries, but such studies are very scarce. Fazah et al. [7], in a community sample of Lebanese 14–18 year olds found that obesity was associated with HRQL impairment, but only in females not males. In contrast, most of the evidence from western societies, as summarized in a recent systematic review [2], suggests that obesity-associated impairment of HRQL applies to both sexes.

We are aware of only one previous study of HRQL in adolescents and young adults in Kuwait: Al-Fayez and Ohaeri [22] used a different instrument to measure HRQL and included older participants than those recruited to the present study, 14-23 y olds. In the study by Al-Fayez and Ohaeri [22] HRQL scores were lower than in samples from western countries, lower in females than males, but the influence of obesity on HRQL was not considered. The reasons why HRQL is lower in girls than boys was not the main focus of the present study, but was consistent with the findings of Al-Fayez and Ohaeri [22].

The secondary aim of the present study was to test the hypothesis that parent-proxy and self- reports of HRQL might differ in obese adolescents. The present study showed that parent-reported HRQL was significantly lower than adolescent-reported HRQL, this emphasizes the potential value of obtaining both parent and self-reports of HRQL [23-25]. Most previous studies have also found that parent-proxy scores for HRQL in obese children and adolescents are lower than scores from self-reports [2]. A detailed discussion of differences in HRQL between parent-proxy versus self reports is beyond the scope of the present manuscript, but a number of detailed studies of the topic have been published [11-15]. The present study simply aimed to establish whether HRQL scores differed between parents and their obese adolescent offspring.

The novelty of the study setting (Arabian Gulf), relatively large sample, heterogeneity of the sample, and ability to compare HRQL between obese versus healthy weight adolescents, were the main study strengths.

The present study also had a number of weaknesses. While the sample size was larger than in many previous studies included in recent systematic reviews [1,2], the school response rate was disappointing and no random selection of schools was possible. In the present study it was not practical to characterize the excluded participants in detail, nor to assess pubertal stage of study participants, yet an assessment of maturation might have added to the information available from chronological age. Most of the psychosocial co-morbidities of child and adolescent obesity tend to worsen with age and/or developmental stage [26]. The present study also focused specifically on HRQL, and cannot address the wider psychosocial co-morbidities of adolescent obesity [1,25-29]. In the present study we were unable to consider all potential influences on HRQL, e.g. we had no measure of socio-economic status (SES) which has a weak association with HRQL in young adults in Kuwait [22], but since the sample was relatively homogenous (same ethnicity, narrow age range, from the same small number of public schools) the range in SES was probably relatively narrow. In our analyses based on paired comparisons of obese and healthy weight adolescents, members of each pair were from the same school year, same sex, and also from the same school. This high degree of pair-wise matching should have minimized the impact of differences other than obesity between the pairs. We were unable to consider any impact of overweight on HRQL, as distinct from obesity, since we excluded the overweight in order to establish adequate contrast between obese and healthy weight groups. However, since the deficits in HRQL associated with obesity in the present study were so small it seems likely that deficits in HRQL associated with overweight might be even smaller. The cross-sectional design of the present study was also a limitation, though most of the research in this area to date has also been cross-sectional [1,2]. Finally, while we did not test the psychometric properties of the PedsQL™ in our sample, in previous studies these have been consistently very positive [7,15-18].

Conclusion

In conclusion, the present study suggests that adolescent obesity is not associated with marked impairment of HRQL in Kuwait, in contrast to what would have been expected from previous studies of largely western samples. This finding suggests that cultural differences might modify the impact of obesity on HRQL among adolescents.

Competing interests

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Author contributions

Both authors were involved in concept and study design; both drafted the manuscript and revised for critical intellectual content; both gave final approval for submission.

Pre-publication history

The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:

http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2431/13/105/prepub

Contributor Information

Shurooq A Boodai, Email: s.boodai.1@research.gla.ac.uk.

John J Reilly, Email: john.j.reilly@strath.ac.uk.

Acknowledgements

We thank the reviewers for their helpful comments on the manuscript.

References

  1. Griffiths LJ, Parsons TJ, Hill AJ. Self-esteem and quality of life in obese children and adolescents: a systematic review. Int J Pediatr Obes. 2010;5:282–304. doi: 10.3109/17477160903473697. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Ul-Haq Z, Mackay DF, Fenwick E, Pell JP. Meta-analysis of the association between Body Mass Index and health-related quality of life among children and adolescents. J Pediatr. 2013;162:280–286. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2012.07.049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Hamzaid H, Abd Talib RA, Azizi NH, Maamor N, Reilly JJ, Wafa SW. Quality of life of obese children in Malaysia. Int J Pediatr Obes. 2011;6:450–454. doi: 10.3109/17477166.2011.590206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Chen X, Sekine M, Hamanishi S, Wang H, Gaina A, Yamagami T, Kagamimori S. Lifestyles and health-related quality of life in Japanese schoolchildren: a cross-sectional study. Prev Med. 2011;40:668–678. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2004.09.034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Lin CY, Su CT, Ma HI. Physical activity patterns and quality of life of overweight boys: a preliminary study. Hong Kong J Occup Ther. 2012;22:31–37. doi: 10.1016/j.hkjot.2012.06.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  6. Lin CY, Su CT, Wang JD, Ma HI. Self rated and parent-rated quality of life for community based obese and overweight children. Acta Paediatr. 2013;102:e114–e119. doi: 10.1111/apa.12108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Fazah A, Jacob C, Moussa E, El-Hage R, Youssef H, Delamarche P. Activity, inactivity, and quality of life among Lebanese adolescents. Pediatrics Int. 2010;52:573–578. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-200X.2009.03021.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Schwimmer JB, Burwinkle TM, Varni JW. Health-related quality of life of severely obese children and adolescents. JAMA. 2003;289:1813–1819. doi: 10.1001/jama.289.14.1813. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Williams J, Wake M, Hesketh K, Maher E, Waters E. Health-related quality of life of overweight and obese children. JAMA. 2005;293:70–76. doi: 10.1001/jama.293.1.70. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Hughes AR, Farewell K, Harris D, Reilly JJ. Quality of life in a clinical sample of obese children. Int J Obes. 2007;31:39–44. doi: 10.1038/sj.ijo.0803410. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Cremeens J, Eiser C, Blades M. Factors influencing agreement between child self report and parent-proxy reports on the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory 4.0 (PedsQL) generic core scales. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2006;4:58–66. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-4-58. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Jozefiak T, Larsson B, Wichstrom L, Mattejat F, Ravens-Sieberer U. Quality of life as reported by schoolchildren and their parents: a cross-sectional survey. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2008;6:34–41. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-6-34. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Upton P, Eiser C, Cheung WY, Hutchings H, Jenney M, Maddocks A, Russell I, Williams JG. Measurement properties of the English version of the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory 4.0 generic core scales. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2005;3:22–30. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-3-22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Upton P, Lawford J, Eiser C. Parent-child agreement across child health-related quality of life instruments: a review of the literature. Qual Life Res. 2008;17:895–913. doi: 10.1007/s11136-008-9350-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Lin CY, Luh WM, Cheng CP, Yang AL, Su CT, Ma HI. Measurement equivalence across child self-reports and parent-proxy reports in the Chinese version of the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory Version 4.0. Child Psychiatr Hum Dev. In press. [DOI] [PubMed]
  16. Varni JW, Seid M, Kurtin PS. PedsQL 4.0: reliability and validity of the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory version 4.0 generic core scales in healthy and patient populations. Med Care. 2001;39:800–12. doi: 10.1097/00005650-200108000-00006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Palermo TM, Long AC, Lewandowski AS, Drotar D, Quittner AL, Walker LS. Evidence-based assessment of health-related quality of life and functional impairment in pediatric psychology. J Pediatr Psychol. 2008;33:983–996. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsn038. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Arabiat D, Elliot B, Draper P, Al Jabery M. Cross-cultural validation of the pediatric quality of life inventory 4.0 (PedsQL) generic core scale into the Arabic language. Scand J Caring Sci. 2011;25:828–833. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6712.2011.00889.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Kuczmarski RJ, Ogden CL, Grummer-Strawn LM, Flegal KM, Guo SS, Wei R, Mei Z, Curtin LR, Roche AF, Johnson CL. CDC growth charts: United States. Adv Data. 2000;8:1–27. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. El-Ghaziri M, Boodai S, Young D, Reilly JJ. Impact of using national versus international definitions of underweight, overweight, and obesity: an example from Kuwait. Publ Health Nutr. 2011;14:2074–2078. doi: 10.1017/S1368980011001285. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Al-Isa AN. Body mass index, overweight and obesity among Kuwaiti intermediate school adolescents aged 10–14 years. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2004;58:1273–1277. doi: 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1601961. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Al Fayez GA, Ohaeri JU. Profile of subjective quality of life and its correlates in a nationwide sample of high school students in an Arab setting using the WHOQOL-Bref. BMC Psychiatry. 2011;25:11–71. doi: 10.1186/1471-244X-11-71. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Eiser C, Morse R. Can parents rate their child's health related quality of life? Results of a systematic review. Qual Life Res. 2001;10:347–357. doi: 10.1023/A:1012253723272. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Ingerski LM, Janicke DM, Silverstein JH. Brief report: quality of life in overweight youth-the role of multiple informants and perceived social support. J Pediatr Psychol. 2007;32:869–874. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsm026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Varni JW, Limbers CA, Burwinkle TM. Impaired health-related quality of life in children and adolescents with chronic conditions: a comparative analysis of 10 disease clusters and 33 disease categories/severities utilizing the PedsQL 4.0 Generic Core Scales. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2007;5:43–57. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-5-43. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Reilly JJ, Kelnar CJ, Alexander DW, Hacking B, McDowell ZC, Stewart LM, Methven E. Health consequences of obesity: systematic review and evidence appraisal. Arch Dis Child. 2003;88:748–752. doi: 10.1136/adc.88.9.748. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Kraig KA, Keel PK. Weight-based stigmatization in children. Int J Obes. 2001;25:1661–1666. doi: 10.1038/sj.ijo.0801813. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Richardson LP, Davis R, Poulton R, McCauley E, Moffitt TE, Caspi A, Connell F. A longitudinal evaluation of adolescent depression and adult obesity. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2003;157:739–745. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.157.8.739. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Braet C, Mervielde I. Psychological aspects of childhood obesity: controlled study in a clinical and nonclinical sample. J Pediatr Psychol. 1997;22:59–71. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/22.1.59. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from BMC Pediatrics are provided here courtesy of BMC

RESOURCES