Abstract
Purpose
Pompe disease (PD) is a progressive metabolic myopathy for which the only available treatment is alglucosidase alfa (Myozyme®). Enzyme replacement therapy (ERT) has improved ventilator-free survival, and cardiac and motor functions in patients with infantile PD. However, for an adequate response to occur, a large amount of enzymes must be infused. In some patients, this may be problematic due to infusion-associated reactions (IARs) occurring in approximately 50% of patients receiving alglucosidase alfa infusions. Whilst the majority of these reactions are mild, life threatening hypersensitivity reactions may occur in some patients. In these patients desensitization is indicated to enable continued ERT safely. Infants and young children with PD and significant infusion reactions pose unique management challenges because of their young age, limited communication skills, variable presentation and underlying cardiomyopathy.
Methods/subjects
In 2 patients with PD who experienced significant ERT-related reactions: an infant (IgE positive) and a young child (IgE negative), we implemented a desensitization protocol, that started by administering a reduced dose of alglucosidase alfa (10 mg/kg weekly) instead of the standard (20 mg/kg biweekly) using serial micro-dilutions that were individually prepared and delivered in a highly regulated manner based on patients’ clinical manifestations and tolerance.
Results
Successful desensitization was achieved in both patients, allowing them to eventually continue to receive the full dose of ERT safely.
Conclusion
Therapeutic demands in infants and young children with PD need to be tailored according to the patient presentation, and underlying cardiac and fluid-volume status. Desensitization allowed both patients to continue alglucosidase alfa treatment at the recommended dose without prolonged interruption of therapy, or further reactions.
Keywords: Alglucosidase alfa, Infantile Pompe disease, Hypersensitivity reactions, Desensitization
1. Introduction
Pompe disease (PD) is a lysosomal storage disorder (LSD) caused by defficiency of lysosomal acid alpha glucosidase (GAA) [1]. Alglucosidase alfa (Myozyme®, Lumizyme®, Genzyme Corporation, Cambridge, MA) is the only available enzyme replacement therapy that has been approved for treatment of PD. The standard recommended dose is 20 mg/kg every 2 weeks [2], some infants have required doses up to 40 mg/kg every 2 weeks (PSK personal experience). Infants with PD who have been treated with alglucosidase alfa showed improved longevity, ventilator-free survival, cardiomyopathy and motor functions [3–5]. However, as is the case with other forms of protein based therapy [6–10], infusion of alglucosidase alfa has been associated with reactions (IARs) of variable severity. This has been underscored in the boxed warning included in the prescription package of alglucosidase alfa where IARs reportedly occur in 51% of patients on ERT [2]. Clinical trials and post-marketing safety studies showed that 1% of patients treated with alglucosidase alfa developed anaphylactic shock and/or cardiac arrest that required life-support measures, and 14% developed allergic reactions that involved at least 2 of 3 body systems [2]. In infants and young children with PD, IARs generally are mild, producing non-specific symptoms, such as headache, dizziness, nausea, vomiting, fatigue, sweating, and pruritis during or after treatment. Severe or significant hypersensitivity reactions range from limited reactions such as generalized hives to more severe, multi-systemic reactions that may include cardiac (e.g., hypotension, tachycardia), respiratory (e.g., bronchospasm, dyspnea, laryngeal edema), cutaneous (e.g. rash, urticaria, angioedema) and/or gastrointestinal (e.g., abdominal pain or cramping, vomiting) manifestations. Hypersensitivity reactions are usually but not always IgE-mediated, while IARs are non-immune mediated and are IgE-negative [11]. General measures against anaphylactic reactions including premedication with antihistamines, antipyretics, and/or corticosteroids, short interruption of the infusion and slowed infusion rates have been successful in the management of IARs in patients receiving ERT due to other LSDs [12–14]. However, when these measures fail to prevent severe/recurrent reactions, desensitization is indicated and has allowed a child with Gaucher disease [15] and an adult with late onset Pompe disease to continue ERT [16]. Desensitization protocols in infants and young children with PD require vigilance to special considerations such as the need for administration of a large amount of protein for clinical benefits to occur, and the restricted amount of fluid intake allowed due to underlying cardiomyopathy. We present herein, the clinical presentation and management details of 2 patients with early onset PD who have undergone successful desensitization to alglucosidase alfa after individualized modifications were made to the standard protocol. The first patient had infantile PD and was IgE-positive; the second patient had severe juvenile-onset PD and was IgE-negative. After desensitization, both patients continued to receive alglucosidase alfa at the standard dose of 20 mg/kg every 2 weeks without suffering from further reactions.
2. Subjects/methods and results
2.1. Case 1: child with infantile PD and IgE-positive and recurrent, severe reactions
A 5 year old male child was prenatally diagnosed with infantile PD after the death of an affected older sibling. Post-natal enzyme studies on dried blood spots and skin fibroblasts showed markedly reduced GAA activity and positive cross reactive immunologic material (CRIM) on Western blot. Cardiac assessment 5 days after birth revealed mild concentric left ventricular hypertrophy with normal left ventricular function. The standard dose of alglucosidase alfa infusion (20 mg/kg every other week) was started at 15 days of life. On treatment, the child showed increased vigor in his extremities, and progressive motor development. ERT was administered without incident until infusion 8 when the patient suffered from recurrent episodes of mild urticaria. The vital signs remained stable, but the child became more irritable and agitated with each infusion, and the urticarial eruptions continued to occur, despite reduction of the infusion rate, temporary interruption of the infusion, and pretreatment with diphenhydramine. These reactions continued through infusion 11 while the child was receiving the lowest recommended rate of alglucosidase alfa (1 mg/kg/h). After infusion 12, testing for alglucosidase alfa specific IgE antibodies was positive. Accordingly, pretreatment with an antihistamine was discontinued to avoid masking manifestations of anaphylaxis. Other tests showed a low IgG antibody titer (1:200), no complement activation, but serum tryptase was elevated. During infusions 12–18, the rash became increasingly more generalized, involving both the trunk and extremities. Due to the progressive nature of these recurrent reactions, positive Ig E status, and inadequate responsiveness to general measures against anaphylaxis, the patient was considered at high risk for a systemic hypersensitivity reaction. After discussing the benefits and risks of desensitization with the parents, a consent was obtained. At infusion 19, the patient was started on a desensitization protocol using micro-dilutions after reducing the dose of alglucosidase alfa to 10 mg/kg, weekly, instead of the standard recommended dose of 20 mg/kg every 2 weeks (Table 1). During desensitization, the patient experienced flushing, urticarial, and macular rashes 20 min after starting the 0.5 mg/kg/h infusion rate. This reaction was treated by reducing the infusion time, giving diphenhydramine, and stopping the infusion until the rash resolved and the patient was hemodynamically stable. The infusion was restarted at half the dose the patient was receiving at the time of the reaction (i.e. 0.25 mg/kg/h); and slowly increased to the full dose as tolerated. The patient continued to receive the next six infusions (19–24) weekly at a slower ramp up dose to that which caused a significant reaction. After two successive infusions with no reactions, the child was given the standard dose of alglucosidase alfa (20 mg/kg for every other week) in gradually increasing concentrations, administered cautiously as micro-dilutions (Table 1). He is currently receiving the standard dose of alglucosidase alfa (20 mg/kg bi-weekly) without the use of micro-dilutions over a period of 3.7 h with no reactions. The child is able to climb, run and his echo and electrocardiograms have remained normal.
Table 1.
Modified desensitization protocol for severe reactions to alglucosidase alpha infusions (Standard recommended dose is 20 mg/kg biweekly) | Individualized protocol based on age (clinical presentation), weight (kg), cardiac status, arrhythmia risk, fluid tolerance, and IgE status |
---|---|
|
|
After two successive infusions were tolerated using the initial micro dilution preparation** modifications were made as follows:
|
2.2. Case 2: child with severe IgE-negative infusion-associated reactions
A 6 year old male child was diagnosed with severe juvenile onset PD at the age of 3.5 years. During infancy, he had delayed gross motor milestones. At 18 months, he was able to walk until he developed progressive muscle weakness and was no longer able to ambulate or sit up. This was followed by respiratory insufficiency necessitating tracheostomy and ventilator support. Echocardiograms and electrocardiograms were normal. The diagnosis of PD was made after muscle biopsy showed extensive vacuolization with glycogen accumulation, and molecular testing revealed a homozygous mutation of the GAA gene, c1655T>C. CRIM status was positive in fibroblasts by Western blot. Alglucosidase alfa infusion was started at 20 mg/kg biweekly according to the standard ramp-up protocol [2], administered in increments of 1, 3, and 5 mg/kg/h, every 30 min and 7 mg/kg/h for the remainder of the infusion. Premedication with acetaminophen (15 mg/kg) and diphenhydramine (1.25 mg/kg) was routinely administered based on institutional practice. Initially, the patient tolerated ERT without incident, and showed increased physical activity, until infusion 6; when he developed a major reaction, 15 min after starting the 3 mg/kg/h rate. Symptoms included flushing, agitation, increased tracheotomy secretions, hypotension, tachycardia, and respiratory distress with hypoxia, followed by lethargy, bradycardia, and decreased responsiveness. The infusion was stopped, the patient was bag ventilated, and an IV bolus of normal saline was given. Twenty five minutes later, he recovered back to his baseline vital signs, oxygen saturation, and responsiveness. One hour after remaining stable, the infusion was resumed at 0.5 mg/kg/h (half the prior dose/rate) for 30 min; then the infusion was increased to 1, 3, 5, and 7 mg/kg/h every 30 min as tolerated. Infusion 7 was started at the rate of 0.5 mg/kg/h for 30 min (last safe rate), but just before increasing the rate to 1 mg/kg/h, he experienced another systemic reaction.
The infusion was stopped, 1 mg/kg IV of dexamethasone was given, and the patient was closely observed. Three hours later, the infusion was resumed at 0.25 mg/kg/h (half the initial dose), then increased to 0.5, 1, 3, 5, and 7 mg/kg/h every 30 min. Prior to infusion 8, IV dexamethasone (1 mg/kg) was added to the pre-medication protocol. Algucosidase alfa infusion was initiated at the rate of 0.25 mg/kg/h for 30 min, then gradually increased in accordance to the preceding infusion protocol. However, at the rate of 1 mg/kg/h, another systemic reaction occurred. Again, the infusion was stopped, and a second dose of IV dexamethasone (1 mg/kg) was given, causing symptoms to resolve within 30 min. The infusion was restarted 90 min later at the rate of 0.25 mg/kg/h, gradually increasing the dose to 0.5, 0.75, 1, 3, 5, and 7 mg/kg/h every 30 min as tolerated. Immunological studies done after infusions 7 and 8 revealed negative serum IgE titers, and complement activation, and normal serum tryptase.
IgG antibody titers specific to alglucosidase alfa rose to 1:12,800, and 1:51,200 respectively. Because the patient could no longer tolerate ERT safely even with premedication, the risks and benefits of desensitization were discussed with the parents, who consented to the intervention. Desensitization started at infusion 9, when the dose of alglucosidase alfa was reduced to 10 mg/kg/dose weekly instead of the standard regimen. Premedication with diphenhydramine and acetaminophen remained in the protocol. Micro dilutions of alglucosidase alfa were prepared and administered as delineated in Table 2. During desensitization, the patient remained asymptomatic until reaching the dose of 1.5 mg/kg/h, when he developed a major systemic reaction associated with anxiety, flushing, tachycardia, hypotension, and hypoxia with desaturation. The infusion was stopped, supplemental oxygen was administered, in addition to normal saline (10 ml/kg IV bolus), IM epinephrine (0.15 mg) for wheezing, and IV dexamethasone (1 mg/kg). The symptoms resolved after 30 min, with stabilization of the vital signs at baseline; then the infusion was resumed, 90 min later at the last safe rate (Table 2). Micro-dilutions were modified to a lower concentration at infusion 10 (Table 2) and administered per protocol with minor non-systemic reactions occurring, and resolving after decreasing the rate and/or administering diphenhydramine, during infusions 10 and 11.
Table 2.
Desensitization approach for severe reactions to alglucosidase alpha infusions Standard recommended dose 20 mg/kg biweekly | Individualized protocol based on age (clinical presentation), wt (kg), severity of systemic reactions, Ig E status |
---|---|
Desensitization protocol started at infusion 9
|
Micro-dilutions for infusion 9
|
General measures for major reactions
| |
Administer as needed
|
Microdilutions for infusion 10
|
At infusion 13, the dose of alglucosidase alfa was increased to a maximum of 4 mg/kg/h, then 10 days later at infusion 14 the dose was increased to 15 mg/kg following 2 successive infusions without incident. The infusion was started at 17 mcg/kg/h, and completed at 6 mg/kg/h. For infusion 15, the dose was increased to the standard dose of 20 mg/kg administered at rates similar to the prior infusion. He is currently tolerating the standard dose, without the need for micro dilutions, administered over 5 h with continued premedication per institutional protocol. Despite, his muscle weakness, he is now less easily fatigued and no longer requires frequent naps or additional rate support on his ventilator when awake. He demonstrates more vigor, good fine motor control and can communicate verbally in full sentences over his ventilator.
3. Discussion
The amount of therapeutic protein delivered to patients with PD is the largest compared to patients on ERT for other disorders. This is due to the high dose of ERT required for a clinical benefit to occur, adding yet, another challenge to the management of infants and young children with PD and significant IARs. In this report, we described the clinical scenario of 2 children with PD who completed their desensitization protocols successfully. Table 3 outlines the principals of desensitization in infants and young children on alglucosidase alfa. Drug desensitization is defined as the induction of a temporary state of immune tolerance to a compound responsible for a hypersensitivity reaction. It is performed by administering increasing doses of the causative medication over a short period of time (hours–days) until the total cumulative therapeutic dose is delivered without incident, this could only be maintained by continuous administration of the causative medication [17]. It is a high-risk procedure used only in patients in whom therapeutic alternatives are less effective or not available after a risk/benefit analysis. This requires a multidisciplinary team approach, where skilled pharmaceutical staff, infusion nurses and clinicians trained and equipped to handle anaphylactic reactions work together. Successful desensitization is achieved when the patient reaches the full therapeutic dose and tolerates repeated administrations of this dose until the therapeutic course is completed [17,18]. The first step in managing hypersensitivity reactions is to have a high index of suspicion and recognize the warning signs of a significant reaction. Signs of an impending significant reaction may be deceiving, appearing as an isolated cutaneous lesion, and/or sudden irritability or crying in infants. Unlike adults, infants and young children with PD are unable to verbalize or describe their symptoms accurately. Therefore, clinicians should rely on parents’ intuitive observations, and encourage them to report any unusual signs or symptoms during and after the infusion. Some patients warrant more vigilance, such as those with acute illness at the time of the infusion, and patients known to have recurrent IARs; or those who receive ERT at very high rates, or test positive for IgE, although anaphylaxis could also occur in IgE-negative patients. After a potential hypersensitivity reaction has been identified, certain principles apply to all patients regardless of the cause as: discontinuation of the infusion, symptom-specific medical intervention, and drawing blood for laboratory tests. Prophylactic anti-histaminics are not recommended in patients who have a history of IgE-positive hypersensitivity reactions, as this may mask early symptoms of a hypersensitivity reaction; especially in infants and young children with PD who have compromised communication skills; where a cutaneous reaction may be the primary sign of a significant reaction. It is important to restart at the last “safe” rate, gradually increasing the dose, rate and concentration. Given the high cost of ERT and the need to modify the dose given as micro dilutions between infusions, it is prudent to prepare the medication doses in small batches as needed. In addition to these 2 patients, at least 10 other patients with PD have been successfully desensitized using this practical approach (PSK personal communication).
Table 3.
Evaluate the immune status
|
Minimize volume for infants with cardiomyopathy |
Introduce 1/2 the standard dose weekly until tolerated |
Prepare micro dilutions of alglucosidase alfa and cautiously infuse, adjusting the dose/rate based on the patients clinical manifestations and tolerance |
If a reaction occurs
|
Reassess the dose and rate of the micro-dilution used, modifying the dose/rate as indicated based on patients’ response to each infusion before preparing the next infusion—consider lengthening the “safe rate” duration and making step-up rates more gradual when needed. |
After 2 successive infusions have been administered successfully at 1/2 the standard dose weekly; recalculate to deliver 3/4 of the dose, every 10 days; when tolerated, administer the full dose at a modified rate scheduled to be given every 2 weeks until the standard recommended rate is achieved. Micro dilution calculations should be made in mcg/kg/h or mg/kg/h. |
4. Conclusions
Meeting therapeutic demands of infants and young children with PD and severe IAR to alglucosidase alfa is a challenge. Desensitization may sometimes be indicated in children, as well as in adults with PD and has led to a reduction in the number and severity of hypersensitivity reactions, allowing patients to continue ERT without prolonged periods of interrupted therapy or severe reactions. The key to successful desensitization in infants and young children with PD is careful monitoring, and tailoring treatment according to their specific presentation, needs and underlying cardiac and fluid-volume status.
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank our patients, families, and pharmacists for providing us with the micro dilutions. We also acknowledge the Duke DCRU nursing staff for their help in managing these patients. This study was done on the Duke DCRU under the Duke CTSI. This publication was made possible by grant number 1UL1RR024128-01 from the National Center for Research Resources (NCCR), a component of the National Institutes of Health (NIH), and NIH Roadmap for Medical Research. Its contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official view of NCRR or NIH.
Footnotes
Disclosures: PSK has received research/grant support and honoraria from Genzyme Corporation. PSK is a member of the Pompe Disease Advisory Board for Genzyme Corporation.
References
- 1.Hirschhorn R, Reuser AJJ. Glycogen storage disease type II: Acid alpha-glucosidase (acid maltase) defficiency. In: Valle D, Beaudet AL, Vogelstein B, Kinzler KW, Antonarakis SE, Ballabio A, editors. The Metabolic & Molecular Bases of Inherited Disease. 8. McGraw-Hill; New York: 2001. pp. 3389–3420. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Myozyme Prescribing Information. Genzyme Corporation; Available at: www.Myozyme.com. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Kishnani PS, Corzo D, Nicolino M, Byrne B, Mandel H, Hwu WL, Leslie N, Levine J, Spencer C, McDonald M, Li J, Dumontier J, Halberthal M, Chien YH, Hopkin R, Vijayaraghavan S, Gruskin D, Bartholomew D, van der Ploeg A, Clancy JP, Parini R, Morin G, Beck M, De la Gastine GS, Jokic M, Thurberg B, Richards S, Bali D, Davison M, Worden MA, Chen YT, Wraith JE. Recombinant human acid [alpha]-glucosidase: major clinical benefits in infantile-onset Pompe disease. Neurology. 2007;68:99–109. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000251268.41188.04. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Kishnani PS, Hwu WL, Mandel H, Nicolino M, Yong F, Corzo D. A retrospective, multinational, multicenter study on the natural history of infantile-onset Pompe disease. J Pediatr. 2006;148:671–676. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2005.11.033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Kishnani PS, Corzo D, Leslie ND, Gruskin D, van der Ploeg A, Clancy JP, Parini R, Morin G, Beck M, Bauer MS, Jokic M, Tsai CE, Tsai BW, Morgan C, O’Meara T, Richards S, Tsao EC, Mandel H. Early treatment with alglucosidase alfa prolongs long term survival of infants with Pompe disease. Pediatr Res. 2009;66:329–355. doi: 10.1203/PDR.0b013e3181b24e94. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Starzyk K, Richards S, Yee J, Smith SE, Kingma W. The long-term international safety experience of imiglucerase therapy for Gaucher disease. Mol Genet Metab. 2007;90:157–163. doi: 10.1016/j.ymgme.2006.09.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Wilcox WR, Banikazemi M, Guffon N, Waldek S, Lee P, Linthorst GE, Desnick RJ, Germain DP. Long-term safety and efficacy of enzyme replacement therapy for Fabry disease. Am J Hum Genet. 2004;75:65–74. doi: 10.1086/422366. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Wraith JE, Clarke LA, Beck M, Kolodny EH, Pastores GM, Muenzer J, Rapoport DM, Berger KI, Swiedler SJ, Kakkis ED, Braakman T, Chadbourne E, Walton-Bowen K, Cox GF. Enzyme replacement therapy for mucopolysaccharidosis I: a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, multinational study of recombinant human alpha-L-iduronidase (laronidase) J Pediatr. 2004;144:581–588. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2004.01.046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Lenz HJ. Management and preparedness for infusion and hypersensitivity reactions. Oncologist. 2007;12:601–609. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.12-5-601. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Wilcock LK, Francis JN, Durham SR. IgE-facilitated antigen presentation: role in allergy and the influence of allergen immunotherapy. Immunol Allergy Clin North Am. 2006;26:333–347. viii–ix. doi: 10.1016/j.iac.2006.02.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Burton BK, Whiteman DAH. Incidence and timing of infusion-related reactions in patients with mucopolysaccharidosis type II (Hunter syndrome) on idursulfase. Mol Genet Metab. 2011;103(2):113–120. doi: 10.1016/j.ymgme.2011.02.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Bodensteiner D, Scott CR, Sims KB, Shepherd GM, Cintron RD, Germain DP. Successful reinstitution of agalsidase beta therapy in Fabry disease patients with previous IgE-antibody or skin-test reactivity to the recombinant enzyme. Genet Med. 2008;10:353–358. doi: 10.1097/GIM.0b013e318170f868. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Kim KH, Decker C, Burton BK. Successful management of difficult infusion-associated reactions in a young patient with mucopolysaccharidosis type VI receiving recombinant human arylsulfatase B (galsulfase [Naglazyme]) Pediatrics. 2008;121:e714–e717. doi: 10.1542/peds.2007-0665. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Peroni DG, Pescollderungg L, Piacentini GL, Cassar W, Boner AL. Effective desensitization to imiglucerase in a patient with type I Gaucher disease. J Pediatr. 2009;155:940–941. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2009.05.033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Lipinski SE, Lipinski MJ, Burnette A, Platts-Mills TA, Wilson WG. Desensitization of an adult patient with Pompe disease and a history of anaphylaxis to Alglucosidase alpha. Mol Genet Metab. 2009;98:319–321. doi: 10.1016/j.ymgme.2009.07.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Cernadas JR, Brockow K, Romano A, Aberer W, Torres MJ, Bircher A, Campi P, Sanz ML, Castells M, Demoly P, Pichler WJ. For the European Network of Drug Allergy and the EAACI interest group on drug hypersensitivity, General considerations on rapid desensitization for drug hypersensitivity—a consensus statement. Allergy. 2010;65:1357–1366. doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2010.02441.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Castells M, Tennant NM, Sloane DE, Hsu FI, Barrett NA, Hong DI, et al. Hypersensitivity reactions to chemotherapy: outcomes and safety of rapid desensitization in 413 cases. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2008;122:574–580. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2008.02.044. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]