Skip to main content
Malaria Journal logoLink to Malaria Journal
. 2013 Jul 8;12:229. doi: 10.1186/1475-2875-12-229

Prognostic indicators in adults hospitalized with falciparum malaria in Western Thailand

Paul N Newton 1,3,, Kasia Stepniewska 2,3, Arjen Dondorp 2,3, Kamolrat Silamut 2, Wirongrong Chierakul 2, Sanjeev Krishna 4, Timothy ME Davis 5, Yupin Suputtamongkol 6, Brian Angus 3, Sasithon Pukrittayakamee 2, Ronnatrai Ruangveerayuth 7, Josh Hanson 2,8, Nicholas PJ Day 2,3, Nicholas J White 2,3
PMCID: PMC3711784  PMID: 23829311

Abstract

Background

Severe malaria remains a major cause of death and morbidity amongst adults in the Asiatic tropics.

Methods

A retrospective analysis of the clinical and laboratory data of 988 adult patients, hospitalized with Plasmodium falciparum malaria and prospectively recruited to malaria studies in western Thailand between 1986 and 2002, was performed to assess the factors associated with a fatal outcome. Different severity scores and classifications for defining severe malaria were compared and, using multiple logistic regression, simple models for predicting mortality developed.

Results

The proportion of patients fulfilling the WHO 2000 definition of severe malaria was 78.1%, and their mortality was 10%. Mortality in patients given parenteral artesunate or artemether (16/317, 5%) was lower than in those given parenteral quinine (59/442, 13%) (P < 0.001). Models using parameter sets based on WHO 1990, 2000 and Adapted AQ criteria plus blood smear parasite-stage assessment gave the best mortality prediction. A malaria prognostic index (MPI), derived from the dataset using five clinical or laboratory variables gave similar prognostic accuracy.

Conclusions

The mortality of severe malaria in adults has fallen and the switch from quinine to artesunate has probably been an important contributor. Prognostic indices based on WHO 2000 definitions, and other simpler indices based on fewer variables, provide clinically useful predictions of outcome in Asian adults with severe malaria.

Keywords: Malaria, Mortality, Thailand, Plasmodium falciparum, Prognosis

Background

Plasmodium falciparum malaria still kills ~0.7 million people each year. The majority of those who die are children in sub-Saharan Africa, but ~43,000 patients still die each year in the Asia-Pacific [1]. Admission clinical features that predict death have been defined in African children [2-6]. For Asian adults the relationships between mortality and a wide range of individual variables have been tested, including parasitaemia and parasite-stage distribution and intraleucocytic malaria pigment on blood smears, renal failure, hypoglycaemia, cerebral malaria, acidosis and older age [7-14] (Additional file 1, Tables 1 and 2). However, there have been few assessments of which combinations of prognostic factors are the best predictors of mortality. Although a single definition may not be appropriate everywhere, it is important to attempt to define severe malaria to aid clinicians in recognizing those at risk of death and in need of parenteral therapy. This will inform decisions on whether transfer to a higher level of care, if available, is appropriate, facilitate comparison between datasets, longitudinal epidemiological surveillance, and robust case definitions in evaluation of interventions [11,15].

Table 1.

Clinical variables included in the ten sets, used in the logistic regression analyses

Variable Bed side Bedside and simple lab WHO 1990 WHO 2000 Adapted AQ Adapted AQ plus late stages BCAM RCAM MSA MPI
Seizures before admission
X
X
X
X
-
-
-
-
-
-
Clinical anaemia
X
X
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Clinical jaundice
X
X
X
X
-
-
-
-
-
-
Bleeding
-
-
X
X
-
-
-
-
-
-
Blackwater fever
-
-
X
X
-
-
-
-
-
-
Temperature
X
X
X
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Pulse
X
X
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Respiratory rate
X
X
-
X
-
-
-
X
-
-
Respiratory distress, requiring mechanical ventilation
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
X
-
Liver palpable
X
X
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
GCS Total
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Pulmonary oedema - - X X - - - - - -

X = included, - = not included.

BCAM score uses serum bicarbonate as a marker of acidosis with cut-off values of ≥24 mmol/L (score = 0) for normal, ≥15- < 24 mmol/L (score = 1) for deranged, and <15 mmol/L (score = 2) for very deranged along with thresholds for coma of GCS ≤14 and GCS ≤10 [23]. The acidosis and coma scores were summed to give the BCAM score, ranging from 0–4.

RCAM score uses respiratory rate as a surrogate marker for acidosis with cut offs of <20 breaths/min (score = 0) for normal, 20–39 breaths/min (score = 1) for deranged, and ≥40 breaths/min (score = 2) for very deranged.

The MSA score was defined as sum of 1 (severe anaemia [haemoglobin, <5 g/dL]) + 2 (acute renal failure [serum creatinine, >3 mg/dL or 250 μmol/L]) + 3 (respiratory distress, requiring mechanical ventilation) + 4 (cerebral malaria [GCS <11]), in which each variable was scored as 0 or 1, depending on its absence or presence, respectively [22].

Table 2.

Laboratory variables included in the ten sets, used in the logistic regression analyses

Blood test variable Bed side Bedside and simple lab WHO 1990 WHO 2000 Adapted AQ Adapted AQ plus late stages BCAM RCAM MSA MPI
Admission parasitaemia
-
X
X
X
X
X
-
-
-
X
Pigmented stages
-
X
-
-
-
X
-
-
-
X
Modal Stage
-
X
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Haematocrit
-
X
X
X
X
X
-
-
-
-
Haemoglobin
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
X
-
White cell count
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Potassium S
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Creatinine S
-
-
X
X
X
X
-
-
X
-
Urea S
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Urea:creatinine ratio S
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Total bilirubinS
-
-
X
-
X
X
-
-
-
X
Direct bilirubin S
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Alkaline phosphatase S
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
AST S
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
ALT S
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Albumin S
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Bicarbonate S
-
-
X
X
X
X
X
-
-
-
Glucose P
-
-
X
X
X
X
-
-
-
-
Lactate P - - - X X X - - - X

X = included, - = not included. S = serum, P = plasma.

Several definitions, classifications and severity scores have been proposed. The World Health Organization (WHO) has produced three guidelines which include definitions of severe malaria (Additional file 1, Tables 1 and 2) [16-18]. A slightly stricter definition of severe malaria (‘AQ’) was developed for a clinical trial in Vietnam [19] and adapted (with the addition of plasma lactate and serum bicarbonate measurements) for a trial in Thailand [20] and the subsequent multicentre SEAQUAMAT trial which enrolled 1461 Asian patients [21]. The malaria severity assessment score (MSA), based on haemoglobin, serum creatinine, requirement for mechanical ventilation and Glasgow coma score (GCS) was developed in central India [22].

Recently, in order to simplify and, therefore, broaden usage, the coma acidosis malaria (CAM) score was developed [23], based on data from Asian adults with severe malaria [21]. A score of <2/5, when tested with data from different studies in Vietnamese and Bangladeshi adults, had a positive predictive value (PPV) for survival of 94-95%, suggesting that these patients could be cared for without admission to an intensive care unit (ICU).

The clinical and laboratory features of adults with falciparum malaria recruited prospectively to hospital-based studies on the western border of Thailand between 1986–2002, conducted by the Mahidol University-Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit and colleagues, were analysed. The specificity and sensitivity of the different severe malaria definitions and scoring systems were examined and simple models to identify adults at risk of death built.

Methods

Study sites, years and studies

Data from 988 adult (≥15 years) patients with asexual forms of P. falciparum present on peripheral blood slides, admitted to hospital with malaria and then recruited to clinical research studies on the western border of Thailand between 1986 and 2002 were analysed. Patients were recruited at hospitals in Kanchanaburi (1986–1993; n = 571), Sangklaburi (1994–1995; n = 74), and Mae Sot (1995–2002; n = 343) and described in a series of papers [24]. All patients gave informed consent to participation and all studies were approved by the Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University and/or the Ethical and Scientific Review Subcommittee of the Ministry of Public Health, Government of Thailand.

Clinical and laboratory assessment

As patients were recruited to a variety of studies, clinical and laboratory evaluations varied. All patients had a full history and examination performed and haematocrit and parasitaemia determined. Thick and thin blood films were stained immediately with Field’s stain and parasites counted and staged [7,8]. Admission blood samples for full blood count, serum sodium, potassium, creatinine, urea, total bilirubin, direct bilirubin, alkaline phosphatase, alanine transaminase (ALT), aspartate transaminase (AST), plasma lactate, glucose and, except in 1994, for plasma bicarbonate. Lumbar punctures were performed for the majority of patients with reduced GCS and cerebrospinal fluid cell, protein and glucose concentrations determined and Gram stains examined.

Management

The anti-malarial treatment regimens used in clinical studies in western Thailand changed over the 18 years as new anti-malarials were introduced and were:

1. Non-artemisinin-based parenteral treatment:

Intravenous quinine dihydrochloride with or without a 20 mg salt/kg or 7 mg/kg loading dose followed by 10 mg/kg every 8 h followed by oral quinine salt 10 mg/kg every 8 h, combined, when the patient was able to take oral medication, with oral quinine alone or with oral tetracycline, doxycycline, mefloquine (alone or combined with sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP)) or single dose primaquine to give a total treatment course of 7 days.

2. Non-artemisinin-based oral treatment:

Oral quinine sulphate 10 mg salt/kg every 8 h alone or with oral tetracycline, doxycycline, mefloquine (alone or combined with SP), single dose primaquine or proguanil to give a total treatment course of 7 days.

Or oral mefloquine (alone or combined with SP) at 15 mg base/kg on the first day with or without 10 mg/kg on the next day

Or oral halofantrine (8 mg/kg at 0, 6, 12 h) with tetracycline plus or minus oral quinine

3. Artemisinin-based parenteral treatment:

Intravenous artesunate (Guilin Pharmaceutical Factory No. 2, Guangxi, People’s Republic of China); 2.4 mg/kg stat, 1.2 mg/kg at 12 h followed by 1.2 mg/kg every 24 h) or intramuscular artemether (3.2 mg/kg stat followed by 1.6 mg/kg every 24 h) for 7 days alone or with oral doxycycline, tetracycline or mefloquine (alone or combined with SP) with or without primaquine. Sixty-nine patients were treated with iv artesunate combined with iv quinine followed by the above oral regime [25].

4. Artemisinin-based oral treatment:

Oral artesunate or artemether (4 mg/kg for 3 days or 2 mg/kg for 7 days) alone or with oral doxycycline, tetracycline or mefloquine (alone or combined with SP) with or without primaquine. Eighteen patients received oral dihydroartemisinin (4 mg/kg) in replacement for one artesunate daily dose [26].

Supportive treatment was in accordance with guidelines [17,27]. Facilities for urinary catheter and nasogastric tube placement, blood transfusion and lumbar puncture were available at Sangklaburi Hospital. In addition, mechanical ventilation, peritoneal dialysis and central venous access were available at Kanchanaburi and Mae Sot.

Statistical analysis and modelling

Six main models have been used to define severe malaria in adults, those published by WHO and the AQ, MSA and CAM scores [16-23] (Additional file 1). The accuracy of the APACHE II score [28] could not be assessed as not all necessary laboratory variables were measured, and the definition of WHO 1986 was not evaluated [16]. Data were not collected specifically for this analysis and in order to examine the sensitivity and specificity of WHO 1990 and 2000 definitions [17,18], minor adaptations were made to allow assessment (Additional file 1, Tables 1 and 2). Where the WHO 2000 definition [18] does not include quantitative cut offs, the WHO 1990 [17] cut offs have been used. As blood pH, and hence base deficit, data were not available, calculation of the CAM score was not possible and so the modified CAM scores, BCAM and RCAM were evaluated, using serum bicarbonate and respiratory rate, respectively, as surrogates of acidosis (Tables 1 and 2).

Statistical analyses were performed using Stata (v11.0; Stata Corporation, USA). All univariate comparisons between survivors and patients who died were performed using logistic regression and adjusted for study site. Ten sets of clinical and laboratory assay variables (Tables 1 and 2) were used to construct diagnostic rules to predict death. Logistic regression analysis with a stepwise forward variable selection procedure was employed to find independent predictors of death at P < 0.055, and P ≥ 0.055 for entry and removal, respectively. Fractional polynomials [29] were used to test for non-linear relationships between outcome variable and continuous covariates. All models were adjusted for artemisinin-based combination therapy (ACT) and study site. The identified model was rerun on the maximum available sample size and each of the variables not in the model were tested for inclusion using the Wald test. The predictive utility of each final model was assessed by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.

Malaria prognostic index

Variables selected into any final logistic regression model, based on published criteria (see above), were used to define the malaria prognostic index (MPI). Since for all logistic models (above), inclusion of study site as an independent variable did not improve the model nor change the co-efficients for other covariates significantly, it was not included in the development of the MPI. Each variable was categorized into four groups using rounded quartiles or commonly used cut offs (as for GCS). Univariate logistic models (with sets of corresponding binary variables) were fitted and categories with similar (P > 0.05) odds ratios (OR) were grouped together. Co-efficients of the final multivariate model were rounded to the nearest integer and used to calculate for each patient a linear combination of variables (i. e, sum of variables multiplied by the rounded co-efficients) – the MPI. The MPI was calculated for each patient and the ROC analysis used to evaluate its prognostic utility.

The predictive value of the MPI was further evaluated using cross validation [30] on a subset of data with no missing values for variables chosen to define MPI. Each observation in this subset was sequentially removed, logistic regression with stepwise variable selection was performed on the remaining n-1 observations using all categorized variables, and the final model was used to calculate sensitivity, specificity on n-1 observations and classification results for the one excluded observation. Co-efficients were rounded to integers and cut offs for the linear predictor between two and six were used. For each cut off, classification results for observations excluded from the subsequent models were used to calculate jacknife estimates of sensitivity and specificity.

Results

Clinical presentation and outcome

Of 988 hospitalized patients enrolled (Tables 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8), two thirds were men and ages ranged from 15 to 74 years. The percentages with severe malaria, as defined by the WHO 1990, WHO 2000, adapted AQ, BCAM, RCAM and MSA scores [17,18,20-22], were widely spread at 61.2, 78.1, 41.7, 24.8, 22.7 and 5.6%, respectively (see Additional files 2, 3, and 4). The overall mortality was 7.8% (77/988). Using the WHO 1990, 2000 and adapted AQ definitions of severe malaria [17-20], the mortalities were 12.4%, 10% and 18.7%, in these groups, respectively.

Table 3.

Admission clinical history details for the three study sites

Variable
All patients
Kanchanaburi
Sangklaburi
Mae Sot
  N Number (%) N   N   N  
No. male
982
654 (67)
569
371 (65)
74
42 (57)
339
241 (71)
Age/years
979
27 (15–74)
564
26 (15–72)
73
25 (15–57)
342
28 (15–74)
Body weight/kg
929
51 (26–165)
544
51 (32–80)
70
50 (26–89)
315
51 (32–165)
Height/cm
441
160 (96–180)
199
160 (96–78)
2
154 (145–163)
240
160 (143–180)
BMI kg/ma
440
33.5 (32.8-34.2)
198
33.0 (32.3-33.8)
2
42.1
240
33.8 (32.7-34.8)
Prior malaria
780
445/335 (57)
464
256/208 (55)
52
26/26 (100)
264
163/101 (62)
Prior malarial drug
988
268/720 (27)
571
233/338 (41)
74
6/68 (8)
343
29/314 (9)
No. days ill
956
4 (1–31)
557
4 (1–31)
68
3 (1–30)
331
3 (1–21)
Females pregnant
328
76/252 (23)
198
70/128 (35)
32
5/27 (16)
98
1/97 (1)
Headache
921
843/78 (92)
520
484/36 (93)
72
66/6 (92)
329
293/36 (89)
Rigors
875
454/421 (52)
491
309/182 (63)
60
15/45 (25)
324
130/194 (40)
Vomiting
906
5 17/389 (57)
511
296/215 (58)
69
37/32 (54)
326
184/142 (56)
Diarrhoea
850
160/690 (19)
461
90/371 (24)
65
8/57 (12)
324
62/262 (19)
Abdominal pain
867
223/644 (26)
478
129/349 (27)
65
7/58 (11)
324
87/237 (27)
Cough
851
143/708 (17)
470
99/371 (21)
55
6/49 (11)
326
38/288 (12)
Seizures 836 28/808 (3) 456 9/447 (2) 60 1/59 (2) 320 18/302 (6)

Number with/without symptom or sign or median (range) except a mean (95% CI) and b geometric mean (95% CI). Percentages shown in brackets. Location of hospitals included: Kanchanaburi (14.06 0 N, 99.50 0E), Sangklaburi 15.16 0 N 98.56 0E), Mae Sot (16.71 0 N 98.57 0E).

Table 4.

Admission clinical examination details for the three study sites

Variable
All patients
Kanchanaburi
Sangklaburi
Mae Sot
  N Number (%) N   N   N  
Dehydration
781
428/353 (55)
424
182/242 (43)
41
13/28 (32)
316
233/83 (74)
Anaemia
932
274/658 (29)
529
161/368 (30)
68
10/58 (15)
335
103/232 (31)
Jaundice
969
226/743 (23)
561
137/424 (24)
72
9/63 (13)
336
80/256 (24)
Temperature °C a
963
38.5 (38.4-38.6)
552
38.4 (38.3-38.5)
74
38.5 (38.3-38.8)
337
38.7 (38.5-38.8)
Pulse/min a
927
101.0 (99.9-102.2)
519
97.4 (95.9-98.9)
73
103.1 (99.2-106.9)
335
106.2 (104.6-108.0)
BP systolic mmHg a
924
108.3 (107.3- 109.3)
515
107.5 (106.2-108.9)
71
105.7 (102.2-109.3)
338
110.1 (108.3-111.8)
BP diastolic mmHg a
918
65.5 (64.7-66.3)
513
64.3 (63.3-65.4)
71
68.8 (66.6-71.0)
334
66.7 (65.3-68.0)
Respiratory rate/min b
909
24.3 (23.8-24.7)
508
22.8 (22.2-23.3)
70
28.1 (26.6-29.8)
331
25.9 (25.2-26.6)
Abdominal tenderness
801
124/677 (15)
413
61/352 (15)
73
8/65 (11)
315
55/260 (17)
Liver palpable
870
338/532 (39)
500
183/317 (37)
68
7/61 (10)
302
148/154 (49)
Spleen palpable
885
190/695 (22)
506
94/412 (19)
71
0/71 (0)
308
96/212 (31)
Cranial nerve abnormalities
515
35/480 (7)
230
23/207 (10)
15
2/13 (13)
270
10/260 (4)
GCS Total
944
15 (3–15)
529
15 (3–15)
73
15 (3–15)
342
15 (3–15)
GCS Eyes
941
4 (1–4)
526
4 (1–4)
73
4 (1–4)
342
4 (1–4)
GCS Verbal
939
5 (1–5)
526
5 (1–5)
73
5 (1–5)
342
5 (1–5)
GCS Motor
941
6 (1–6)
526
6 (1–6)
73
6 (1–6)
342
6 (1–6)
Fundal haemorrhages 443 11/432 (3) 202 6/196 (3) 10 1/9 (10) 231 4/227 (2)

Number with/without or median (range) except a mean (95% CI) and b geometric mean (95% CI).

Table 5.

Admission haematology laboratory details for the three study sites

Variable
All patients
Kanchanaburi
Sangklaburi
Mae Sot
  N Number (%) N   N   N  
Parasitaemia /μLb,c
953
72,694 (64.402-82,054)
540
53,766 (45,785-63,138)
74
71,793 (51,736-99,625)
339
117,827 (95,989-144,633)
Rings %
874
97 (1–100)
486
97 (6–100)
66
98 (42–100)
322
95 (1–100)
Trophozoites %
874
3 (0–99)
486
2.5 (0–94)
66
2.0 (0–58)
323
4.0 (0–99)
Schizonts %
876
0 (0–25)
486
0 (0–12)
67
0 (0–6)
320
0 (0–25)
Pigmented stages > 104/L
868
274/594 (32)
482
121/361 (25)
66
13/53 (20)
322
140/180 (43)
Trophozoites and schizonts%
874
4 (0–99)
486
3 (0–94)
66
2 (0–58)
321
5 (0–99)
Modal Stage %
833
55 (19–99)
446
56 (19–99)
66
70 (30–96)
339
53 (23–97)
Haematocrit %
962
37 (6–56)
549
37 (8–56)
74
38 (22–50)
285
38 (6–54)
Haemoglobin g/dL a
761
11.3 (11.1-11.5)
476
10.9 (10.7-11.1)
0
-
314
12.0 (11.6-12.3)
White cells x 109/L
889
6.8 (1.5-67.0)
519
6.6 (1.8-67)
56
5.7 (1.5-25)
292
7.1 (1.9-54)
Neutrophils %
863
75 (12–97)
507
73 (31–97)
64
74 (12–96)
281
77 (41-96)
Platelets x109/L 527 74 (0.5-404) 246 105 (16–384) 0 - 329 45 (1–404)

c number of asexual parasites/1000 erythrocytes on thin film x haematocrit% × 125.6 or number of asexual parasites/200 white cells on thick film assuming white cell count 8 × 109/L.

Table 6.

Admission biochemistry laboratory variables for the three study sites

Variable
All patients
Kanchanaburi
Sangklaburi
Mae Sot
  N value N value N value N value
Sodium mmol/L, d S
764
135.4 (93.8-155.0)
419
137.8 (94–155)
16
136.5 (130–141)
328
133 (111–146)
Potassium mmol/L, e S
761
3.81 (1.2-7.51)
417
3.8 (1.2-7.5)
16
3.70 (3.3-4.3)
331
3.9 (1.8-7.1)
Creatinine μmol/L f S
880
105.6 (35.2-1056)
475
114 (35–1056)
74
97 (66–202)
334
106 (39–836)
Urea mmol/L g S
892
19.5 (3.5-226.5)
484
6.5 (1.5-56)
74
6.7 (2.5-18.7)
334
7.7 (1.3-81)
Urea mmol/L:creatinine μmol/L ratio
879
0.070 (0.005-0.256)
474
0.060 (0.005-0.244)
74
0.067 (0.022-0.014)
331
0.078 (0.021-0.026)
Total bilirubin μmol/L b,h, S
859
28.9 (26.8 - 31.0)
456
23.6 (21.1-26.4)
73
29.4 (24.5-35.2)
330
38.0 (34.6-41.8)
Direct bilirubin μmol/L I, S
847
8.5 (0.3-488.6)
451
8.5 (0.3-487)
72
6.1 (1.5-152)
324
9.9 (1.0-389)
Alkaline phosphatase IU/L b,j, S
844
43.2 (41.1-45.3)
442
31.5 (29.8-33.3)
73
34.9 (31.9-38.2)
329
69.2 (64.2-74.6)
AST IU/L k, S
858
41 (0.4-1795)
455
33 (5–210)
73
43 (0.4-183)
330
52 (10–1795)
ALT IU/L b,l, S
856
20.7 (19. 5–22.0)
456
19.2 (17.6-21.1)
73
24.5 (21.3-28.2)
327
22.2 (20.4-24.1)
Albumin g/L a,m, S
862
33.7 (33.2-34.2)
459
31.9 (31.2-32.7)
73
38.6 (37.0-40.1)
330
35.0 (34.3-35.7)
Calcium (uncorrected) mmol/L a,n, S
397
2.06 (1.47-2.56)
0
-
73
2.12 (2.09-2.15)
324
2.05 (2.04-2.07)
Phosphate mmol/Lb,o,S
291
0.82 (0.32-2.65)
0
-
73
1.19 (0.32-1.87)
218
0.81 (0.32-2.65)
Bicarbonate mmol/L a,p, S
687
20.5 (20.2-20.8)
348
21.0 (20.5-21.4)
16
20.4 (18.9-22.0)
323
20.0 (19.4-20.5)
Chloride mmol/L a,q, S
752
102.2 (101.7-102.7)
407
103.7 (103.0-104.3)
16
103.3 (101.2-105.3)
329
100.2 (99.6-100.8)
Glucose mmol/L r, P
846
6.4 (0.7-37. 5)
447
6.2 (1.5-38)
70
6.2 (3.5-25)
329
7.3 (0.7-31.1)
Lactate mmol/L s, P 805 2.7 (0.3-27.6) 414 2.7 (0.4-28) 74 2.2 (0.9-16) 317 2.8 (0.3-22)

Number with/without or median (range) except a mean (95% CI) and b geometric mean (95% CI).

d normal range 135–145 mmol/L; e normal range 3.5-5.5 mmol/L; f normal range 70–150 μmol/L; g normal range 2.5-6.7 mmol/L; h normal range 5.1-17 μmol/L; I normal range 1.7-5.1 mmol/L; j normal range 30–300 IU/L; k normal range 5–35 IU/L; l normal range 5–35 IU/L; m normal range 35–50 g/L; n normal range 2.2-2.6 mmol/L; o normal range 1.0-1.4 mmol/L; p normal range 21–28 mmol/L; q normal range 95–105 mmol/L; r normal range 3.5-5.5 mmol/L; s normal <4 mmol/L.

Table 7.

Admission clinical variables for those who died and survived

Variable
All patients
Survived
Died
P
  N   % N   % N   %  
No. male
982
654
67
906
598
66
76
56
74
0.197
Age/years
979
27 (15–74)
-
905
27 (15–74)
-
74
26 (15–67)
-
0.410
Body weight/kg
929
51 (26–165)
-
861
51 (26–165)
-
68
50 (40–75)
-
0.715
Prior malaria
780
445/335
57
748
438/310
59
32
7/25
22
<0.001
Prior malarial drug
988
268/720
27
911
242/669
27
77
26/51
34
0.310
No. days ill
956
4 (1–31)
-
886
3 (1–31)
-
70
4 (1–20)
-
0.836
No. females pregnant
328
76/252
23
308
75/233
24
20
1/19
5
0.049
Headache
921
843/78
92
866
794/72
94
55
49/6
89
0.511
Rigors
875
454/421
52
821
428/393
52
54
26/28
48
0.522
Vomiting
906
517/389
57
855
484/371
56
51
33/18
65
0.268
Diarrheoa
850
160/690
19
805
152/653
19
45
8/37
18
0.805
Abdominal pain
867
223/644
26
823
215/608
26
44
8/36
18
0.200
Cough
851
143/708
17
806
136/670
17
45
7/38
16
0.897
Seizures
836
28/808
3
786
18/768
2
50
10/40
20
<0.001
Dehydration
781
428/353
55
734
395/339
54
47
33/14
70
0.063
Anaemia
932
274/658
29
862
236/626
27
70
38/32
54
<0.001
Jaundice
969
226/743
23
892
175/717
20
77
51/26
66
<0.001
Temperature o C a
963
38.5 (38.4 - 38.6)
-
892
38.6 (38.5-38.6)
-
71
38.0 (37.7-38.3)
-
<0.001
Pulse/min a
927
101.0 (99.9-102.2)
-
856
100.1 (99.0-101.2)
-
71
113.3 (108.6–117.9)
-
<0.001
BP systolic mmHg a
924
108.3 (107.3-109.3)
-
851
107.9 (106.9-108.9)
-
73
113.5 (108.4– 118.5)
-
0.004
BP diastolic mmHg a
918
65.5 (64.7-66.3)
-
846
65.4 (64.6-66.2)
-
72
66.8 (63.6-70.0)
-
0.247
Respiratory rate/min b
909
24.3 (23.8-24.7)
-
837
23.9 (23.5-24.3)
-
71
29.2 (26.9 - 31.6)
-
<0.001
Abdominal tenderness
801
124/677
15
743
116/627
16
58
8/50
14
0.689
Liver palpable
870
338/532
39
800
299/501
38
70
39/31
56
0.005
Spleen palpable
885
190/695
22
818
172/646
21
67
18/49
27
0.308
Cranial nerve abnormalities
515
35/480
7
467
20/447
4
48
15/33
31
<0.001
GCS Total
944
15 (3–15)
-
882
15 (3–15)
-
62
9 (3–15)
-
<0.001
GCS Eyes
941
4 (1–4)
-
881
4 (1–4)
-
60
4 (1–4)
-
<0.001
GCS Verbal
939
5 (1–5)
-
881
5 (1–5)
-
58
1 (1–5)
-
<0.001
GCS Motor
941
6 (1–6)
-
881
6 (1–6)
-
60
5 (1–6)
-
<0.001
Fundal haemorrhages 443 11/432 3 389 4/385 1 54 7/47 13 <0.001

Number with/without or median (range) except a mean (95% CI) and b geometric mean (95% CI). Footnotes as for Table 3.

Table 8.

Admission laboratory variables for those who died and survived

Variable
All patients
Survived
Died
P
  N value N value N value  
Admission parasitaemia μLb,c
953
72,694 (64,402–82,054)
883
68,850 (60,837-77,917)
70
144,012 (86,460-239,876)
0.002
Rings%
874
97 (1–100)
811
98 (1–100)
63
48 (1–100)
<0.001
Trophozoites%
874
3 (0–99)
811
2 (0–99)
63
52 (0–99)
<0.001
Schizonts%
876
0 (0–25)
813
0 (0–6)
63
0 (0–25)
<0.001
Pigmented stages > 104/L
868
274/594 (32%)
805
227/578 (28%)
63
47/16 (75%)
<0.001
Trophozoites and schizonts %
874
4 (0–99)
811
2 (0–99)
63
52 (0–99)
<0.001
Modal Stage %
833
55 (19–99)
779
56 (23–99)
54
47 (19–94)
0.001
Haematocrit %
962
37 (6–56)
888
37 (6–56)
74
33 (12–50)
<0.001
Haemoglobin g/dL a
761
11.3 (11.1- 11.5)
704
11.4 (11.2- 11.6)
57
10.1 (9.5 -10.8)
<0.001
White cells x 109/L
889
6.8 (1.5-67.0)
818
6.6 (1.5 - 67)
71
11.2 (2.4 - 63)
<0.001
Neutrophils%
863
75 (12–97)
796
75 (12–97)
67
72 (36–95)
0.101
Platelets 109/L
527
74 (0.5-404)
491
75 (0.5 - 404)
36
50 (4–188)
0.001
Sodium mmol/L, d, S
764
135.4 (93.8-155.0)
698
135.3 (100.4-155.0)
66
136.7 (93.8–153.0)
0.618
Potassium mmol/L, e, S
761
3.81 (1.2-7.51)
696
3.80 (2.0 –7.51)
65
4.50 (1.2-7.1)
<0.001
Creatinine μmol/L f, S
880
105.6 (35.2 - 1056)
810
105.6 (35.2 - 1056)
70
240 (46.6 - 880)
<0.001
Urea mmol/L g, S
892
19.5 (3.5-226.5)
821
18.7 (3.5-138)
71
58.2 (10.7 - 227)
<0.001
Urea mmol/L:creatinine μmol/L ratio
879
0.070 (0.005-0.256)
809
0.065 (0.005-0.257)
70
0.078 (0.030-0.260)
<0.001
Total bilirubin μmol/L b,h
859
28.9 (26.8 - 31.0)
797
26.4 (24.6-28.4)
62
90.6 (69.6-118.1)
<0.001
Direct bilirubin μmol/L i
847
8.5 (0.3-488.6)
787
8.3 (0.3 - 489)
60
40.3 (1.4 - 389)
<0.001
Alkaline phosphatase IU/L b,j
844
43.2 (41.1-45.3)
781
42.1 (40.0-44.2)
63
60.7 (50.5-72.8)
<0.001
AST IU/L k
858
41.0 (0.4-1795)
796
40 (0.4 - 1795)
62
95 (22–1200)
0.001
ALT IU/L b,l
856
20.7 (19. 5–22.0)
794
19.7 (18.5-20.9)
62
41.3 (33.6-50.8)
<0.001
Albumin g/L a,m
862
33.7 (33.2-34.2)
798
33.9 (33.4-34.4)
64
30.6 (28.5-32.7)
0.001
Calcium (uncorrected) mmol/L a,n
397
2.06 (1.47-2.56)
369
2.06 (1.52-2.56)
28
2.06 (1.47-2.40)
0.385
Phosphate mmol/L b,o
291
0.82 (0.32-2.65)
272
0.81 (0.32-2.10)
19
1.23 (0.48-2.65)
<0.001
Serum bicarbonate mmol/L a,p
687
20.5 (20.2-20.8)
629
21.0 (20.7-21.3)
58
14.7 (13.1-16.3)
<0.001
Serum chloride mmol/L a,q
752
102.2 (101.7-102.7)
688
102.3 (101.9-102.7)
64
100.6 (98.0-103.2)
0.023
Plasma glucose mmol/L r
846
6.4 (0.7-37. 5)
778
6.4 (0.7 - 38)
68
6.8 (2.2-18.5)
0.139
Plasma lactate mmol/L s 805 2.7 (0.3-27.6) 741 2.5 (0.3 - 22) 64 8.5 (1.9 - 28) <0.001

Number with/without or median (range) except a mean (95% CI) and b geometric mean (95% CI). Footnotes as for Tables 3, 5 and 6.

Mortality did not significantly differ between the three sites (9% in Kanchanaburi, 3% in Sangklaburi and 8% in Mae Sot; P = 0.20). Artemisinin derivatives were given to 7% of patients in Kanchanaburi, 77% in Sangklaburi and 83% in Mae Sot (P < 0.001), reflecting temporal changes in treatment policy and study protocols. Patients in Kanchanaburi had received prior malarial treatment more frequently than at other sites and women there were more often pregnant. Patients in Mae Sot presented with lower coma scores (69% with coma score of 15 compared to >80% at the other sites and 20% with coma score ≤11 compared to 9-10% in the other sites), higher parasitaemia, higher proportions of trophozoites on admission film and a greater likelihood of a palpable liver or spleen (Tables 3, 4, 5, and 6). However, other key variables such as haematocrit, bicarbonate and lactate were similar across all sites.

Forty-one admission variables were significantly associated (P < 0.05) with death on bivariate analysis (Tables 7 and 8). Variables previously associated with mortality that were not significantly associated with death in our cohort were patient age, the number of days of illness before admission, and plasma glucose. Although there was no apparent overall relationship between mortality and age, mortality was higher with increasing age for those treated with quinine (OR (95% CI) 1.029 (1.006-1.051) P = 0.012), but not for those treated with artemisinins (OR 0.953 (0.904-1.005) P = 0.078).

Prognostic value of parasite staging

Staging of parasite development on peripheral blood smears provides prognostic information additional to the parasite count itself; the median percentage of ring stages amongst those who survived was 98% and amongst those who died 48% (P = 0.0001). The percentage of the modal parasite stage was significantly lower amongst those who died than in those who survived (P = 0.0002), suggesting that lower circulating parasite stage synchronicity was associated with death. Using the cut offs of Silamut and White of pigmented stages >104/μL or a parasitaemia of >5 x 105/μL [7], the sensitivity and specificity for predicting death were 84% and 67%, respectively.

Therapeutic responses

The median (range) coma recovery time and time to death were 24 (1–188) h (N = 46) and 44 (2–641) h (N = 76) respectively (Table 9). Artemisinin derivative-based therapy was given to 378/958 (39%) of patients starting in 1993, and artesunate or artemether was given to 317/759 (42%) of those administered a parenteral anti-malarial. A significantly higher proportion of patients had severe disease (as defined using adapted AQ criteria) in the artemisinin derivative group (46%) than the non-artemisinin group (40%) (P < 0.001). However, the mortality in those given parenteral artesunate or artemether (16/317, 5%) was lower than those given parenteral quinine (59/442, 13%) (P < 0.001). No patient without severe disease who received oral anti-malarial treatment died. The post-admission development of complications such as oliguria, seizures or pulmonary oedema and the use of ventilation, lumbar puncture, transfusion and inotropes, were all associated with death (Table 10). Mortality decreased with time, from 9% in 1986–1992 to 7% in 1993–1998 and 6% in 1999–2002 (OR = 0.943 (0.896-0.994), P = 0.030). There was increasing use of artemisinin derivatives over the same periods (0%, 72% and 93% of patients, respectively) and the corresponding percentages of parenteral treatments that were with intravenous/intramuscular artemisinin derivative were 0%, 67% and 93%, respectively. After adjusting for treatment type and study site, there was no trend in mortality over time (OR = 0.961 (0.847-1.091), P = 0.538).

Table 9.

Anti-malarial drug treatment and outcome

Variable
All
Alive
Died
  +/− % +/− % +/− %
Non-artemisinin/artemisinin derivative therapy
580/378
60.5
521/362
59.0
59/16
78.7
Parenteral quinine/artemisinin derivative. Patients given both parenteral quinine and artemisinin derivatives excluded
430/276
60.9
371/261
58.7
59/15
79.7
Oral quinine/artemisinin derivative and no parenteral anti-malarial
93/60
60.8
93/60
60.8
0/0
-
Number given/not given antibiotic a
124/818
13.2
94/778
10.8
30/40
42.9
No. given/not given inotrope
65/872
6.9
13/856
1.5
52/16
76.5
No. given/not given anti-epileptic drug
97/843
10.3
59/812
6.8
38/31
55.1
No. given/not given nasogastric tube
65/859
7.0
36/828
4.2
29/31
48.3
No. given/not given urinary catheter
207/728
22.1
142/725
16.4
65/3
95.6
No. given/not given blood transfusion
160/828
16.2
132/779
14.5
28/49
36.4
No. given/not given dialysis
31/898
3.3
7/854
0.8
24/44
77.4
No. given/not given ventilation
85/845
9.1
25/839
2.9
60/6
90.9
No. given/not given central venous access line
99/840
10.5
45/825
5.2
54/15
78.3
No. given/not given lumbar puncture
90/849
9.6
56/813
6.4
34/36
48.6
No. developing/not developing pulmonary oedema
14/958
1.4
7/888
0.8
7/70
9.1
No. developing/not developing oliguria
94/843
10.0
43/826
5.0
51/17
75.0
No. developing/not developing seizures
39/909
4.1
20/852
2.3
19/57
25.0
No. of nights in hospitalb
4 (1–34)
-
4 (1–34)
-
2 (1–27)
-
Coma Recovery Time/hb
24 (1–188)
-
-
-
-
-
Time to death/hb - - - - 44 (2–641) -

a excluding doxycycline and tetracycline given for malaria. b Median (range). All comparisons between alive and dead were statistically significant (P < 0.001, adjusted for study site).

Table 10.

Summary of multiple logistic regression models for outcome for Bedside and WHO models

Covariate OR 95% CI P value AUROCC 95% CI
Bedside
 
 
 
 
0.93 (0.90-0.96)
Anaemia
2.510
1.173
5.373
0.018
 
Jaundice
3.235
1.534
6.823
0.002
 
Temperature 0C
0.673
0.490
0.926
0.015
 
Pulse/min
1.031
1.007
1.056
0.010
 
Respiratory rate/min
1.061
1.010
1.115
0.018
 
GCS
0.717
0.654
0.785
<0.001
 
Treatment with ACT
0.387
0.134
1.118
0.080
 
Bedside + Simple Lab
0.96 (0.93 -0.98)
Temperature 0C
0.579
0.405
0.829
0.003
 
Respiratory rate/min
1.081
1.027
1.139
0.003
 
Log10 parasitaemia
8.606
3.525
21.011
<0.001
 
GCS
0.663
0.589
0.745
<0.001
 
% Trophozoites and schizonts
1.029
1.014
1.045
<0.001
 
Treatment with ACT
0.253
0.078
0.825
0.023
 
WHO (1990)
0.95 (0.90-1.00)
GCS
0.673
0.590
0.767
<0.001
 
Serum creatinine μmol/L
1.005
1.001
1.009
0.007
 
Serum bicarbonate mmol/L
0.844
0.763
0.934
0.001
 
Serum total bilirubin μmol/L
1.006
1.001
1.010
0.011
 
Log10 parasitaemia
1.902
1.060
3.410
0.031
 
Treatment with ACT
0.838
0.224
3.142
0.794
 
WHO (2000) and Adapted AQ a
0.97 (0.96-0.99)
GCS
0.673
0.582
0.778
<0.001
 
Serum bicarbonate mmol/L
0.856
0.747
0.980
0.024
 
Serum lactate mmol/L
1.197
1.052
1.362
0.006
 
Log10 parasitaemia
2.460
1.168
5.182
0.018
 
Serum creatinine μmol/L
1.006
1.002
1.010
0.003
 
Treatment with ACT 1.000 0.220 4.555 1.000  

All estimates are adjusted for treatment with ACT and study site. a the same variables were identified from the WHO (2000) and Adapted AQ models.

Relationships between clinical syndromes

Of 111 patients with cerebral malaria (GCS < 11), 97 had evaluable data. Of these, 68 (70%) had plasma lactate >4 mmol/L and/or serum bicarbonate <15 mmol/L and/ or serum creatinine >264 μmol/L, and 36 (53%) of these died compared with three (10%) among 29 cerebral malaria patients without these abnormalities (P = 0.001). Among cerebral malaria patients, mortality did not significantly differ between those with and without jaundice (total serum bilirubin >50 μmol/L): 42% (23/55) versus 34% (15/44) (P = 0.547). Mortality was higher in patients with renal impairment; 82% (18/22) in those with a serum creatinine >264 μmol/L compared with 28% (23/83) in those with lower levels (P < 0.001).

Multiple logistic regression analysis of variables associated with death

All final models were adjusted for treatment with ACT and study site. No interactions between covariates and treatment were significant in any of the models and study site was not significant (P > 0.05). Tables 10 and 11 list variables included in each of the eight final models, all having a maximum of eight variables, consistent with recommendations [31].

Table 11.

Summary of multiple logistic regression models for outcome for Adapted AQ + pigmented stages, BCAM and RCAM models

Covariate OR 95% CI P value AUROCC 95% CI
Adapted AQ + pigmented stages
 
 
 
 
0.97 (0.96-0.99)
GCS
0.728
0.641
0.828
<0.001
 
Plasma lactate mmol/L
1.341
1.190
1.510
<0.001
 
Serum creatinine μmol/L
1.006
1.003
1.009
<0.001
 
% Trophozoites & schizonts
1.026
1.009
1.043
0.003
 
Log10 parasitaemia
4.064
1.506
10.969
0.006
 
Treatment with ACT
0.438
0.103
1.869
0.265
 
BCAM
 
 
 
 
0.92 (0.87-0.97)
GCS/15
0.718
0.652
0.791
<0.001
 
Serum bicarbonate mmol/L
0.780
0.717
0.849
<0.001
 
Treatment with ACT
0.718
0.230
2.237
0.568
 
RCAM
 
 
 
 
0.88 (0.84-0.93)
GCS/15
0.680
0.627
0.736
<0.001
 
Respiratory rate/min
1.097
1.055
1.141
<0.001
 
Treatment with ACT 0.329 0.126 0.857 0.023  

All estimates are adjusted for treatment with ACT and study site.

Considering the WHO- and AQ-based models, the WHO 1990, WHO 2000, Adapted AQ and Adapted AQ + Pigmented stages, variable sets gave the best predictive power and the areas under the ROC curves (AUROCCs) were not significantly different (Tables 10 and 11, Additional files 2, 3, and 4). Models derived from bedside or bedside + simple laboratory covariates had significantly smaller AUROCCs, when compared to the Adapted AQ model using the common data set (P = 0.008 and 0.016, respectively). Several variables appeared in all four ‘best’ models and had similar effects across models, such as GCS (OR 0.67-0.73 for increase by one point), serum bicarbonate (OR 0.84-0.86 for increase of 1 mmol/L), plasma lactate (OR 1.20-1.34 for increase of 1 mmol/L), parasitaemia (OR 1.90-4.06 for ten-fold increase) and serum creatinine (OR 1.005-1.006 for increase of 1 μmol/L).

The BCAM and RCAM scores could be calculated for 662 and 873 patients, respectively, and mortality rose with increasing score for both (Table 12). Of 498 patients with a low BCAM (<2) score, three (0.6%) died (PPV (95%CI) for survival 99.4 (98.2–99.8)%), and of the 675 patients with low RCAM (<2) score, 11 (1.6%) died (PPV for survival 98.4 (97.1-99.1)%). The BCAM score AUROCC as a predictor for mortality was 0.907 (0.861-0.953) and that for the RCAM score 0.86 (0.81-0.91)(P = 0.050). A score <2 was an optimal cut-off value in this data set for both BCAM and RCAM, with sensitivity and specificity of 93.8% and 80.6% for BCAM and 81% and 81% for RCAM.

Table 12.

Mortality among patients by BCAM and RCAM scores

Score, Outcome 0 1 2 3 4 Total
BCAM
 
 
 
 
 
 
Died/total (%)
1/124 (0.8)
2/374 (0.5)
12/79 (15.2)
16/60 (26.7)
17/25 (68.0)
48/662 (7.3)
RCAM
 
 
 
 
 
 
Died/total (%) 0/97 (0) 11/578 (1.9) 12/108 (11.1) 25/74 (33.8) 11/16 (68.8) 59/873 (6.8)

For the MSA score [22] (Additional file 1) using admission variables plus the presence or absence of mechanical ventilation during admission where such ventilation was available (all sites except Sangklaburi) for 635 patients, 516 (81.3%) had an MSA score of 0. Mortality was 2/539 (0.4%) for MSA 0–2, 10/45 (22.2%) for MSA 3–4, 5/12 (41.7%) for MSA 5–6 and 24/39 (61.5%) for MSA ≥7. If ≥5 is taken as the cut off, the PPV for survival was 97.9 (96.4-98.8)%. Among patients who had MSA and BCAM scores calculated (n = 527) the AUROCC for the MSA score in predicting death was 0.97 (0.95-0.98), which was significantly better than that for the BCAM score 0.90 (0.84-0.96) (P = 0.007). The optimal cut off for the data presented here appeared to be <3 rather than <5 as reported [22]; with a cut off of <3 the PPV was 99.6 (98.7-100.0)%, sensitivity 95.1% and specificity 90.4%.

Considering all ten models, those based on the MSA score and the Adapted AQ with pigmented parasites had the best predictive power, but AUROCCs for models based on WHO criteria were not significantly lower. Simple rules for classification of severity as a MPI (Table 13, Figure 1), gave sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 82% with co-efficient of 3 rounded to the nearest integer, and sensitivity of 93% and specificity of 92% for a cut off of 4. When compared to the best performing models, based on MSA and Adaptive AQ + Pigmented stages, MPI showed equally good predictive power: AUROCC = 0.96 (0.95-0.98) for MPI rounded to the nearest integer, and 0.97 (0.96-0.99) for MPI rounded to the nearest 0.5 compared to 0.98 (0.96-0.99) for MSA and 0.97 (0.94-0.99) for AQ dataset, based on 450 patients who could be evaluated in all four models. In cross-validation, in all runs, the best sensitivity and specificity were obtained for cut offs between 3 and 4 (Figure 2). For a cut off of 3, the jacknife sensitivity and specificity were 97.1% and 87.1%; for a cut off of 3.5 they were 97.1% and 87.1%; and for a cut off of 4 they were 74% and 94%.

Table 13.

Prognostic index for severe malaria

N = 668 / n = 43
Co-efficient
    MPI A MPI B
GCS <5
4.318
4
4.5
GCS 5-11
1.543
2
1.5
Parasitaemia >315,000/μL
1.238
1
1
Plasma lactate > 5 mmol/L
2.267
2
2.5
Serum bilirubin > 58 μmol/L1
1.191
1
1
Pigmented parasites >20%
1.673
2
1.5
Treatment with ACT
−1.280
−1
−1.5
AUROCC
0.97
0.97
0.97
Cut off 2
 
3
3
Sensitivity
 
100%
100%
Specificity
 
82%
88%
Cut off 3
 
4
3.5
Sensitivity
 
93%
95%
Specificity   92% 91%

MPI A = co-efficients rounded to the nearest integer with cut offs of 3.

MPI B = co-efficients rounded to the nearest 0.5 with cut offs of 3.

1 if not available; creatinine >132 μmol/L can be used instead.

and cut off of 3 would give sensitivity and specificity of 98%.

and 82% for MPI A and 96% and 88% for MPI B.

2 which gives the highest specificity for 100% sensitivity.

3 which gives the “optimal” sensitivity and specificity.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Relationship between malaria prognostic index and mortality. Malaria prognostic indices MPI A and MPI B are defined in Table 13.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Sensitivity (filled circle) and specificity (empty circle) for different cut offs of malaria prognostic index in cross validation.

Discussion

The prognosis of severe falciparum malaria has improved markedly since the introduction of parenteral artesunate [21,32]. This large series describing patients with falciparum malaria admitted to hospitals in western Thailand spanned the transition from quinine to artemisinins, and although the data were not from a randomized comparison, mortality was substantially lower in patients who received artemisinin derivatives. Despite the effect of changes in anti-malarial therapy, prognostic indices based on WHO 2000 definitions, and other simpler indices based on fewer variables, provided clinically useful predictions of outcome in Asian adults with severe malaria.

Models using variable sets based on WHO 2000 and Adapted AQ with pigmented stages gave the best prediction of mortality, and were comparable to the results based on the MSA score using a smaller sample. Very similar results were also obtained with the MPI based on the most commonly selected variables, GCS, plasma lactate, parasitaemia, serum bilirubin and percentage of pigmented parasites. This will need to be evaluated in independent series of adults with falciparum malaria in similar settings of unstable malaria transmission. This score suffers from the disadvantage, unlike the RCAM score, that determination of 4/5 variables (all except GCS) requires skilled technicians and equipment/consumables and quality assurance that are seldom available where severe malaria is common.

There are at least four limitations of this analysis: specifically, not all patients admitted to the study hospitals were recruited, recruitment criteria varied, there are missing values, and a variety of different doctors reviewed the patients with consequent variability in the nature of both clinical assessment and inpatient management. However, any such differences are likely to result in false negative, rather than false positive associations. The MSA score differs from the others scores discussed, as it is not strictly an admission predictive prognostic score, including mechanical ventilation during hospitalization. Some potential prognostic factors such as haemoglobinuria and abnormal bleeding were too infrequent to allow reliable conclusions to be drawn. Serum bilirubin and plasma lactate were not measured in the South East Asian Quinine Artesunate Malaria Trial (SEAQUAMAT) and therefore the MPI could not be calculated for this dataset [21].

This study differs from that of Hanson [23], which only included patients classified as having severe malaria and was designed to determine which subset of patients could safely be managed without ICU referral. This is reflected in the relatively low mortality in the series described here, as severe malaria was not necessarily a criterion for recruitment. The broader patient population included may well explain the inclusion of parasitaemia as predictive of death in this series and not in that of Hanson [23]. As this series includes many patients without severe disease, the specificity of variables in predicting death may be higher than in series including patients with pre-selected severe disease. However, in busy clinical practice a tool that could define unselected patients admitted to hospital as at risk of death would be valuable.

The wide variation in mortality estimates in this dataset among those with severe malaria (10-18%) and indeed the wide range of estimates of severe disease (6–60%), depending on which definition is used, illustrates the importance of definitions in comparisons between studies, in meta-analyses, and in understanding the host and geographical variability in the presentation and outcome of severe malaria. Various terms, such as ‘uncomplicated’ and ‘mild’, are used to refer to malaria that is not severe. Severe disease is also equated with ‘complicated’ malaria. To avoid confusion, terminology should be standardized with ‘severe’ malaria referring to malaria with clinical and/or laboratory features suggesting a clinically significant risk of death (e.g. >5%) despite anti-malarial treatment, and ‘uncomplicated’ as those without such prognostic features and that the terms ‘complicated’ and ‘mild’ are not used.

The present study suggests that, if laboratory tests are available, the history of the illness and the physical examination, apart from GCS and respiratory rate, are relatively unimportant in assessing prognosis in a population of malaria patients. Unlike in other series [13], increased age was not associated with death, except for those treated with quinine. However, as this series did not include children and a smaller percentage (7.7%) were >50 years old, the age range was narrower.

In this series, the mortality of cerebral malaria was increased three-fold if concurrent acidosis and/or renal failure were present and these factors are crucial in predicting death. The ease of identifying patients with cerebral malaria may have made study of other complications less of a focus and these data suggest that more research on the pathophysiology and treatment of acidosis and renal dysfunction would provide information that would improve management and outcome [12,14,32]. The use of relatively inexpensive plasma lactate portable meters may assist in the triage of patients in tropical hospitals without access to biochemical analyzers, and interventions directed at acidosis and renal impairment might reduce mortality. Although capital costs for veno-venous haemofiltration are relatively high, and intensive care support is required, running costs in comparison to peritoneal dialysis are low [33]. In areas of the Asiatic tropics with good communications but low health expenditure, regional centres for the management of severe malaria through haemofiltration may assist in lowering mortality.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interest.

Authors’ contributions

PN and KS analysed the data and wrote the first draft of the manuscript. PN, AD, KS, WC, SK, TMED, YS, BA, SP, RR, JH, ND, NW looked after the patients and revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Supplementary Material

Additional file 1

Severe malaria definitions.

Click here for file (47.5KB, doc)
Additional file 2

World Health Organization (1990) criteria for severe malaria and outcome.

Click here for file (61KB, doc)
Additional file 3

World Health Organization (2000) criteria for severe malaria and outcome.

Click here for file (60.5KB, doc)
Additional file 4

Adapted ‘AQ’ criteria, from Hien et al.[19,20], and outcome.

Click here for file (52KB, doc)

Contributor Information

Paul N Newton, Email: paul@tropmedres.ac.

Kasia Stepniewska, Email: kasia@tropmedres.ac.

Arjen Dondorp, Email: arjen@tropmedres.ac.

Kamolrat Silamut, Email: oye@tropmedres.ac.

Wirongrong Chierakul, Email: kae@tropmedres.ac.

Sanjeev Krishna, Email: s.krishna@sgul.ac.uk.

Timothy ME Davis, Email: tim.davis@uwa.edu.au.

Yupin Suputtamongkol, Email: ysuputtamongkol@gmail.com.

Brian Angus, Email: Brian.Angus@ndm.ox.ac.uk.

Sasithon Pukrittayakamee, Email: yon@tropmedres.ac.

Ronnatrai Ruangveerayuth, Email: ronnatrai@hotmail.com.

Josh Hanson, Email: drjoshhanson@gmail.com.

Nicholas PJ Day, Email: nickd@tropmedres.ac.

Nicholas J White, Email: nickw@tropmedres.ac.

Acknowledgements

We thank all the patients and hospital staff at Kanchanaburi, Sangklaburi and Mae Sot, all the staff of the Mahidol University Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit, especially Khun Patchari Prakongpan and the Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University. We are extremely grateful to the numerous people of many nationalities who have contributed to the care of these patients and the associated clinical research in Thailand over many years. TMED is supported by a National Health and Medical Research Council Practitioner Fellowship. This study was supported by the Wellcome Trust-Mahidol University-Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Programme, funded by the Wellcome Trust of Great Britain.

References

  1. World Health Organization. Global Malaria Report 2011. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2011. http://www.who.int/entity/malaria/world_malaria_report_2011/9789241564403_eng.pdf. [Google Scholar]
  2. Molyneux ME, Taylor TE, Wirima JJ, Borgstein A. Clinical features and prognostic indicators in paediatric cerebral malaria: a study of 131 comatose Malawian children. Q J Med. 1989;71:441–459. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Walker O, Salako LA, Sowunmi A, Thomas JO, Sodeine O, Bondi FS. Prognostic risk factors and post-mortem findings in cerebral malaria in children. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1992;86:491–493. doi: 10.1016/0035-9203(92)90082-N. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Marsh K, Foster D, Waruiru C, Mwangi I, Winstanley M, Marsh V, Newton C, Winstanley P, Warn P, Peshu N, Pasvol G, Snow R. Indicators of life-threatening malaria in African children. New Eng J Med. 1995;332:1399–1404. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199505253322102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Jaffar S, Van Hensbroek MB, Palmer A, Schdieer G, Greenwood B. Predictors of fatal outcome following childhood cerebral malaria. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1997;57:20–24. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.1997.57.20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Von Seidlein L, Olaosebikan R, Hendriksen IC, Lee SJ, Adedoyin OT, Agbenyega T, Nguah SB, Bojang K, Deen JL, Evans J, Fanello CI, Gomes E, Pedro AJ, Kahabuka C, Karema C, Kivaya E, Maitland K, Mokuolu OA, Mtove G, Mwanga-Amumpaire J, Nadjm B, Nansumba M, Ngum WP, Onyamboko MA, Reyburn H, Sakulthaew T, Silamut K, Tshefu AK, Umulisa N, Gesase S, Day NP, White NJ, Dondorp AM. Predicting the clinical outcome of severe falciparum malaria in African children: findings from a large randomized trial. Clin Infect Dis. 2012;54:1080–1090. doi: 10.1093/cid/cis034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Silamut K, White NJ. Relation of the stage of parasite development in the peripheral blood to prognosis in severe falciparum malaria. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1993;87:436–443. doi: 10.1016/0035-9203(93)90028-O. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Phu NH, Day N, Diep PT, Ferguson DJP, White NJ. Intraleucocytic malaria pigment and prognosis in severe malaria. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1995;89:200–204. doi: 10.1016/0035-9203(95)90496-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Trang TTM, Phu NH, Vinh H, Hien TT, Cuong BM, Chau TT, Mai NT, Waller DJ, White NJ. Acute renal failure in patients with severe falciparum malaria. Clin Infec Dis. 1992;15:874–880. doi: 10.1093/clind/15.5.874. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. White NJ, Warrell DA, Chanthavanich P, Looareesuwan S, Warrell MJ, Krishna S, Williamson DH, Turner RC. Severe hypoglycemia and hyperinsulinemia in falciparum malaria. N Engl J Med. 1983;309:61–66. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198307143090201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Warrell DA, Looareesuwan S, Warrell MJ, Kasemsarn P, Intaraprasert R, Bunnag D, Harinasuta T. Dexamethasone proves deleterious in cerebral malaria. New Eng J Med. 1982;306:313–319. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198202113060601. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Day NPJ, Phu NH, Mai NTH, Chau TT, Loc PP, Chuong LV, Sinh DX, Holloway P, Hien TT, White NJ. The pathophysiological and prognostic significance of acidosis in severe adult malaria. Crit Care Med. 2000;28:1833–1840. doi: 10.1097/00003246-200006000-00025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Dondorp AM, Lee SJ, Faiz MA, Mishra S, Price R, Tjitra E, Than M, Htut Y, Mohanty S, Yunus EB, Rahman R, Nosten F, Anstey NM, Day NP, White NJ. The relationship between age and the manifestations of and mortality associated with severe malaria. Clin Infect Dis. 2008;47:151–157. doi: 10.1086/589287. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Dondorp AM, Chau TTH, Phu NH, Mai NT, Loc PP, Chuong LV, Sinh DX, Taylor A, Hien TT, White NJ, Day NP. Unidentified acids of strong predictive value in severe malaria. Crit Care Med. 2004;32:1683–1688. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000132901.86681.CA. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Bejon P, Berkley JA, Mwangi T, Ogada E, Mwangi I, Maitland K, Williams T, Scott JA, English M, Lowe BS, Peshu N, Newton CR, Marsh K. Defining childhood severe falciparum malaria for intervention studies. PLoS Med. 2007;4:e251. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0040251. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. World Health Organization. Severe and complicated malaria. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1986;80 Supplement: 1–50. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. World Health Organization. Severe and complicated malaria. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1990;84(S2):1–65. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. World Health Organization. Severe and complicated malaria. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2000;94 Supplement 1:1–90. [Google Scholar]
  19. Hien TT, Day NPJ, Nguyen HP, Nguyen THM, Tran THC, Pham PL, Dinh XS, Ly VC, Ha V, Waller D, Peto TEA, White NJ. A controlled trial of artemether or quinine in Vietnamese adults with severe falciparum malaria. N Engl J Med. 1996;335:76–83. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199607113350202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Newton PN, Angus BJ, Chierakul W, Dondorp A, Ruangveerayuth R, Silamut K, Teerapong P, Suputtamongkol Y, Looareesuwan S, White NJ. A randomised comparison of artesunate and quinine in the treatment of severe falciparum malaria. Clin Inf Dis. 2003;37:7–16. doi: 10.1086/375059. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Dondorp A, Nosten F, Stepniewska K, Day N, White N. South East Asian Quinine Artesunate Malaria Trial (SEAQUAMAT) group: Artesunate versus quinine for the treatment of severe falciparum malaria: a randomised trial. Lancet. 2005;366:717–725. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67176-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Mishra SK, Panigrahi P, Mishra R, Mohanty S. Prediction of outcome in adults with severe falciparum malaria: a new scoring system. Malar J. 2007;6:24. doi: 10.1186/1475-2875-6-24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Hanson J, Lee SJ, Mohanty S, Faiz MA, Anstey NM, Charunwatthana P, Yunus EB, Mishra SK, Tjitra E, Price RN, Rahman R, Nosten F, Htut Y, Hoque G, Hong Chau TT, Hoan Phu N, Hien TT, White NJ, Day NP, Dondorp AM. A simple score to predict the outcome of severe malaria in adults. Clin Infect Dis. 2010;50:679–685. doi: 10.1086/649928. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. White NJ. Twenty years of the Wellcome-Mahidol University, Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Program. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Pub Hlth. 1999;30:216–219. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Newton PN, Chierakul W, Ruangveerayuth R, Silamut K, Teerapong P, Krudsood S, Looareesuwan S, White NJ. A comparison of artesunate alone with combined artesunate and quinine in the parenteral treatment of acute falciparum malaria. Trans Roy Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2001;95:519–523. doi: 10.1016/S0035-9203(01)90025-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Newton PN, Van Vugt M, Teja-Isavadharm P, Keeratithakul D, Rasameesoroj M, Teerapong P, Ruangveerayuth R, Slight T, Nosten F, Suputtamongkol Y, Looareesuwan S, White NJ. A comparison of oral artesunate and dihydroartemisinin antimalarial bioavailability in acute falciparum malaria. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2002;46:125–127. doi: 10.1128/AAC.46.1.125-131.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. White NJ. The treatment of malaria. N Engl J Med. 1996;335:800–806. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199609123351107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Wilairatana P, Looareesuwan S. APACHE II scoring for predicting outcome in cerebral malaria. J Trop Med Hyg. 1995;98:256–260. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Royston P, Altman DG. Regression using fractional polynomials of continuous covariates: Parsimonious parametric modeling (with discussion) Appl Stats. 1994;43:429–467. doi: 10.2307/2986270. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  30. Lachenbruch PA, Mickey MR. Estimation of error rates in discriminant analysis. Technometrics. 1969;10:1–11. [Google Scholar]
  31. Peduzzi P, Concato J, Feinstein AR, Holford TR. Importance of events per independent variable in proportional hazards regression analysis II. Accuracy and precision of regression estimates. J Clin Epidemiol. 1995;48:1503–1510. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(95)00048-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Dondorp AM, Fanello CI, Hendriksen IC, Gomes E, Seni A, Chhaganlal KD, Bojang K, Olaosebikan R, Anunobi N, Maitland K, Kivaya E, Agbenyega T, Nguah SB, Evans J, Gesase S, Kahabuka C, Mtove G, Nadjm B, Deen J, Mwanga-Amumpaire J, Nansumba M, Karema C, Umulisa N, Uwimana A, Mokuolu OA, Adedoyin OT, Johnson WB, Tshefu AK, Onyamboko MA, Sakulthaew T, Ngum WP, Silamut K, Stepniewska K, Woodrow CJ, Bethell D, Wills B, Oneko M, Peto TE, Von Seidlein L, Day NP, White NJ. AQUAMAT group. Artesunate versus quinine in the treatment of severe falciparum malaria in African children (AQUAMAT): an open-label, randomised trial. Lancet. 2010;376:1647–1657. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61924-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Phu NH, Hien TT, Mai NTH, Chau TT, Chuong LV, Loc PP, Winearls C, Farrar J, White N, Day N. Hemofiltration and peritoneal dialysis in infection associated acute renal failure in Vietnam. New Eng J Med. 2002;347:895–902. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa020074. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Additional file 1

Severe malaria definitions.

Click here for file (47.5KB, doc)
Additional file 2

World Health Organization (1990) criteria for severe malaria and outcome.

Click here for file (61KB, doc)
Additional file 3

World Health Organization (2000) criteria for severe malaria and outcome.

Click here for file (60.5KB, doc)
Additional file 4

Adapted ‘AQ’ criteria, from Hien et al.[19,20], and outcome.

Click here for file (52KB, doc)

Articles from Malaria Journal are provided here courtesy of BMC

RESOURCES