Abstract
Objective
In children with ventilation tubes (VTs) inserted for chronic otitis media with effusion (COME), determine if any parameter of Eustachian tube (ET) function measured by the Forced Response Test (FRT) predicts disease recurrence after the VT becomes non-functional.
Study Design
Prospective study of those factors that predict disease recurrence in children with VTs inserted for COME.
Methods
Forty-nine subjects (73 ears; 28 male, 34 white, aged 5.3±1.2 years) with COME had VTs inserted and were evaluable for disease status after the VT(s) became non-functional. The FRT was done when the VTs were patent and results for the last test before the VT became non-functional were used in the analysis. After each VT became non-functional, the children were followed for disease recurrence over a 12-month period. Logistic regression was used to determine if the ET opening pressure, closing pressure and/or Dilatory Efficiency predicted disease recurrence. That model was expanded to include age, sex, race, history of adenoidectomy, previous VTs and the duration of VT patency as potential predictive factors.
Results
Twenty-nine (40%) ears had recurrence of significant disease within 12 months after the VT became non-functional. For the complete logistic regression model, male gender (P=0.03), non-white race (P=0.02), a shorter period of VT patency (P=0.01) and a low Dilatory Efficiency (P=0.01) were significant predictors of disease recurrence.
Conclusion
A measure of active ET function, Dilatory Efficiency, but not measures of passive function predicted disease recurrence within the 12 months after the VT became non-functional in children with COME.
Keywords: Eustachian Tube Function, Chronic Otitis Media with Effusion, Recurrence
INTRODUCTION
The middle ear (ME) is a relatively non-collapsible biological gas cavity that must be maintained at near ambient pressures1. However, ME-ambient pressure equivalence is unstable, being perturbed by changes in atmospheric pressure and by the progressive decrease in ME pressure due to passive diffusive nitrogen exchange between the ME and local mucosal blood1. The Eustachian tube (ET) represents a potential communication between the ME airspace and the nasopharynx2. While the lumen of the ET is usually closed, the normally functioning ET is opened intermittently by active tensor veli palatini muscle (mTVP) contraction during swallowing and other activities3 to allow gradient-driven gas transfer between the nasopharynx and ME, thereby lessening any extant ME-ambient pressure gradients.
In animals, failure of the ET to open causes the progressive development of ME underpressures that at -200 to -300 daPa (ref ambient) provokes ME mucosal inflammation, capillary disruption and transudation of fluid from the local blood to the ME, a disease presentation similar to that of otitis media with effusion (OME)4. Other studies in monkeys show that the disease resolves in concert with the reacquisition of mTVP-assisted ET dilation5.
In infants, children and adults with ventilation tubes (VTs) inserted into their tympanic membranes as a treatment for chronic OME (COME), ET function (ETF) tests usually document a severely limited transfer of gas between the ME and nasopharynx during activities associated with mTVP activity6-9. Alternatively, other studies reported an association between COME and the ability to change ME pressure with forcible sniffing, a condition indicating incomplete closure of the ET lumen in COME patients10,11. While these results support an association between ET dysfunction and COME, it is unclear whether the poor ETF is the cause or consequence of COME.
The present study was designed to clarify the directionality of the cause-effect relationship by determining if the results of ETF testing in children with VTs inserted for COME can predict disease recurrence after the VTs become nonfunctional. We tested ETF using a modification of the Forced-Response Test (FRT) which captures information on the magnitude of the pressures that close the ET lumen and on the magnitude of the mTVP-assisted active ET openings12. The advantages of using the FRT in young children are the relatively short duration of the procedure and the limited participation required of the test subject8,9. Our primary hypothesis was that inefficient mTVP-assisted ET opening is a robust predictor of disease recurrence during the follow-up period.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
We prospectively enrolled children aged 3 to 6 years with VTs inserted for COME in a two-stage study: documentation of ETF while VTs were functional and documentation of disease recurrence after the VTs became non-functional. All children were enrolled within 6 weeks after VT insertion for COME (defined as: ≥3 months bilateral ME effusion or ≥6 months unilateral ME effusion or ≥3 episodes of OME during the previous year, or recurrence of OME after extrusion of previous VTs for OME). Children were excluded if they had cleft palate or other syndromes predisposing to OM, a history of complications of OM or its treatment, or were unable to cooperate during testing. The study was approved by the IRB of the University of Pittsburgh and written Informed Consent was obtained from a parent before enrolling their child in the study.
FRTs were scheduled at 3-month intervals while the VTs were patent. The number of FRT sessions varied among ears (depending upon length of time of VT patency, child cooperation and other factors). For purposes of this analysis, we used the results for the last, most complete test done when the child was free of a cold (closest to the time of VT non-functionality). After each VT became non-functional, the ear was followed monthly for ME status by pneumatic otoscopy and tympanometry for up to 12 months or until ME effusion was observed in the same ear on 3 consecutive visits. We then assigned each ear to one of three groups: Group-I: little to no ME disease on follow-up (no otitis media or 1-2 visits with otitis media), Group-II: ME effusion diagnosed at 3 consecutive visits during follow-up, and Group-III: ears that could not be assigned to either of Groups I or II for any of a variety of reasons. For our analysis, we focused on those ears with an unambiguous post-VT disease assignment (Groups I and II).
ETF was measured in each ear with a patent VT using a modification of the FRT originally described by Cantekin and colleagues12. Briefly, a hermetically sealed probe was introduced into the ear canal ipsilateral to the ET being evaluated. The probe was coupled to a flow sensor, pressure transducer and, via a valve, to a constant flow pump. For testing, the pump delivered ≈23 ml/min (QO) of air-flow to the ME. This caused the ME pressure to increase and the ET to passively open at a measured pressure (opening pressure, PO). Continued delivery of air-flow resulted in a semi-stable system pressure (PS) at a transET air-flow (QS) approximately equal to QO. The child was instructed or induced to swallow, an action associated with mTVP contraction, and the pre-swallow system pressure (PA) and maximum transET air-flow during the swallow (QA) were recorded. The pump was turned off allowing the ET to passively close while retaining a residual ME pressure (closing pressure, PC). The test was then repeated for the contralateral ET using an identical procedure. These data were processed to calculate the active (CA=QA/PA) and passive (CS=QS/PS) conductances which are measures of the airflow through the ET during mTVP contraction and under basal conditions, respectively. We then calculated the mTVP Dilatory Efficiency as the active/passive conductance ratio (CA/CS) which measures the fold increase (or decrease) in transET airflow during mTVP contraction. The FRT parameters analyzed for this report included the opening pressure which measures the summed extra- and intra-luminal forces acting to maintain a closed ET lumen, the closing pressure which measures the periluminal pressure acting to close the ET lumen, and the Dilatory Efficiency which measures the efficiency of active, mTVP-assisted tubal dilation.
Analyses of the pressure-flow waveforms for each test were done by each of two technicians and the resulting data were compared and reconciled prior to entry into the database. To analyze these data, we used a series of logistic regression models to determine if the included factors predicted disease recurrence during the follow-up period after the VTs became non-functional. Our first models operated on all ears that achieved a study endpoint and included as candidate predictors of disease recurrence the opening pressure, closing pressure and the Dilatory Efficiency without and then with selected demographic and historical characteristics for each subject. The sample size constrained the number of characteristics that could be included in the model and therefore we chose a subset representing those with the greatest potential to affect disease recurrence. This set included age, sex, race, the number of past VT insertions, the duration of VT patency and if the child had a previous adenoidectomy, an adenoidectomy with VT insertion at the time of entry or no adenoidectomy. Also, we recognize that in subjects with two evaluable ears (bilateral cases), the left and right ears may not be independent observations. Therefore, we reran the full logistic regression model while limiting the data to the ears of subjects with one evaluable ear (unilateral) and the right ears of bilateral cases and then all unilateral ears and the left ears of bilateral cases. Finally, we recognize that Group-I was not homogenous in that ears with no evidence of disease recurrence were combined with those that had one or two months of OM on the assumption that that any short duration OM episode represented the consequences of a recent cold (or allergy) and did not reflect a recurrence of COME by usual definitions. However, this introduced a new variable into the analysis and, therefore, we eliminated those ears with 1 or 2 visits with OM and re-ran the complete logistic regression model. Data were analyzed using the NCSS Statistical Package (Kaysville, Utah). We used the cut-off of 0.05 to assign statistical significance.
RESULTS
Eighty-four children with bilateral VTs were entered; 33 children were withdrawn by their parents or investigators or discontinued follow-up before reaching an endpoint in either ear. Of the remaining 51 subjects with evaluable outcomes, 2 subjects had a clinical course not defined by either Group-I or Group-II and were excluded from the analysis.
Classification as either Group-I or Group-II was done for 73 ears of 49 children (25 with one ear evaluable, 24 with both ears evaluable). Summary data for the demographic and historical characteristics of these 49 subjects are shown in Table I. For those 25 subjects with only 1 ear evaluable, the status of the contralateral ear was: 8 had a VT or perforation at end of follow-up, 12 had not achieved a study endpoint and 5 were not classifiable as either Group-I or Group-II. Of the 73 ears included in the analysis, 44 were classified as Group-I (no OM [n=21] or 1-2 visits with OM [n= 23]), and 29 were classified as Group-II.
TABLE I.
Characteristic | Total Subjects (N=49) | 1 Ear Evaluable (N=25) | 2 Ears Evaluable (N=24) |
---|---|---|---|
Mean Age (years) | 5.3±1.2 | 5.4±1.2 | 5.1±1.3 |
Sex | |||
Male | 28 | 16 | 12 |
Female | 21 | 9 | 12 |
Race | |||
White | 34 | 18 | 16 |
African-American | 13 | 6 | 7 |
Bi-racial | 2 | 1 | 1 |
Past VT Procedures | |||
0 | 22 | 14 | 8 |
1 | 21 | 9 | 12 |
2 | 4 | 2 | 2 |
3 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
Adenoidectomy | |||
None | 14 | 9 | 5 |
With Entry VT | 23 | 8 | 15 |
Prior to Entry VT | 12 | 8 | 4 |
History of sinusitis | |||
Yes | 10 | 8 | 2 |
No | 39 | 17 | 22 |
Allergy tested positiv | |||
Yes | 7 | 4 | 3 |
No | 42 | 21 | 21 |
Asthma | |||
Yes | 13 | 4 | 9 |
No | 26 | 21 | 15 |
Diagnosed with reflux | |||
Yes | 7 | 4 | 3 |
No | 42 | 21 | 21 |
Number of children in household: | |||
1 | 10 | 7 | 3 |
2-4 | 36 | 17 | 19 |
5 | 3 | 1 | 2 |
Family hx nasal allergy: | |||
Yes | 25 | 14 | 11 |
No | 24 | 11 | 13 |
*Family hx asthma: | |||
Yes | 18 | 10 | 8 |
No | 31 | 15 | 16 |
*Family hx ear disease: | |||
Yes | 25 | 14 | 11 |
No | 24 | 11 | 13 |
Daily environment: | |||
Home | 13 | 10 | 3 |
Pre-school | 17 | 7 | 10 |
Daycare 2-5 child | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Daycare >5 child | 3 | 1 | 2 |
School | 15 | 6 | 9 |
(unknown) | (1) | (1) | 0 |
Breastfeeding hx: | |||
None | 19 | 11 | 8 |
≤<4 months | 13 | 4 | 9 |
>4 months | 16 | 9 | 7 |
(unknown) | (1) | (1) | 0 |
Smoke exposure | |||
None | 48 | 24 | 24 |
Mother or father | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Full-time babysitter | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Part-time babysitter | 0 | 0 | 0 |
(unknown) | (1) | (1) | 0 |
VT – ventilation tube
Family hx = positive for mother, father or sibling
In an initial screening of the data, we compared the relevant summary parameter for each of the characteristics listed in Table I between groups using either the Fisher's Exact test (for dichotomous variables) or the Student's t test (for continuous variables). The only significant between-group differences were in the sex (p=0.02) and race (p=0.03) distributions for the groups .
Summary data for the three FRT parameters and for the subject characteristics included in the subset of tested predictors are reported in Table II for each group. The simple logistic regression model that included only the FRT variables as possible predictors identified Dilatory Efficiency but not the ET opening (P=0.84) or closing (P=0.57) pressures as a significant predictor of disease recurrence (Beta coefficient =-0.49, Z-Value=-2.64, P=0.01).
TABLE II.
Group-I (N=44 ears) | Group-II (N=29 ears) | |
---|---|---|
Age at Entry (years) | 5.1±1.4 | 5.4±1.0 |
Prior VT Insertions (mean) | 0.75±0.81 | 0.83±0.85 |
Prior Adenoidectomy | ||
None | 9 | 10 |
With Entry VT | 27 | 11 |
Prior to Entry VT | 8 | 8 |
Mean Duration of VT Patency (months) | 16.8±6.5 | 10.7±3.9 |
Mean Opening Pressure (daPa) | 342±118 | 304±122 |
Mean Closing Pressure (daPa) | 92±55 | 79±36 |
Mean Dilatory Efficiency | 3.11±2.88 | 1.28±1.23 |
Male | 19 (43%) | 21 (72%) |
Race | ||
White | 37 (84%) | 17 (59%) |
African-American | 7 (16%) | 12 (41%) |
VT – ventilation tube
A summary of the logistic regression analyses for the complete model that included the FRT parameters and the subject characteristics within the subset is presented in Table III. The r2 for the complete model (Model 1) was 0.50. Low Dilatory Efficiency, short VT duration, being male and being non-white were significant predictors of a greater risk of disease recurrence. For the models operating on the “single ear” data subsets (models II, III), the r2 was 0.49 for unilateral ears and the right ears of the bilateral cases and was 0.63 for unilateral ears and the left ears of bilateral cases. For both models, the duration of VT patency and the Dilatory Efficiency were retained as significant predictors of COME recurrence, but race and gender were no longer significant, most probably reflecting the loss in statistical power associated with the lesser sample sizes for these models. For the model that controlled for the heterogeneity of Group-I ears by restricting group membership to ears with no evidence of OM during the follow-up period, the r2 was 0.53 and the logistic regression equation again identified a short duration of VT patency (Beta=-0.29, Z-value=-2.35, P=0.02) and a low Dilatory Efficiency (Beta=-1.12, Z-value=-2.09, P=0.04) as significant predictors of disease recurrence.
TABLE III.
PARAMETER | BETA COEF | SE | Z-Value | P-Level |
---|---|---|---|---|
MODEL 1 | ||||
Intercept | 8.76 | 3.42 | 2.56 | 0.01 |
Sex (Male) | 2.22 | 1.04 | 2.14 | 0.03 |
Race (non-White) | 2.28 | 1.14 | 2.01 | 0.04 |
# VTs | 0.11 | 0.72 | 0.16 | 0.87 |
Adenoidectomy | -0.88 | 1.03 | -0.85 | 0.39 |
Age Entry | -0.82 | 0.44 | -1.87 | 0.06 |
Duration VT | -0.32 | 0.12 | -2.63 | 0.01 |
Opening Pressure | 0.00 | 0.01 | -0.46 | 0.64 |
Closing Pressure | 0.00 | 0.01 | -0.23 | 0.82 |
Dilatory Efficiency | -0.75 | 0.30 | -2.53 | 0.01 |
MODEL 2 | ||||
Intercept | 12.91 | 5.29 | 2.44 | 0.01 |
Duration VT | -0.44 | 0.19 | -2.37 | 0.02 |
Dilatory Efficiency | -0.83 | 0.40 | -2.08 | 0.04 |
MODEL 3 | ||||
Duration VT | -0.43 | 0.20 | -2.20 | 0.03 |
Dilatory Efficiency | -1.14 | 0.51 | -2.25 | 0.02 |
DISCUSSION
The goal of the present study was to test the hypothesis that a parameter of the FRT is a significant predictor of disease recurrence in children with COME during the 12-month period after the VTs inserted for that condition became non-functional. The results for the simple and more complex logistic regression analyses performed on the study data support this hypothesis, finding that Dilatory Efficiency, a measure of the efficiency of mTVP-assisted ET opening, was a significant predictor of group assignment, with lower Dilatory Efficiencies associated with disease recurrence. However, isolating Dilatory Efficiency as the single predictor for disease recurrence in a limited regression model had an r2 of 0.15 and correctly assigned 77% of the Group II (recurrence) ears but only 45% of the Group I ears. These results show that Dilatory Efficiency is not sufficiently specific or sensitive to be used alone in the clinical setting for predicting the presence or absence of disease recurrence in individual patients with VTs inserted for COME. Nonetheless, our analyses convincingly demonstrate a role for inefficient muscle-assisted ET opening in the pathogenesis and recurrence of COME in children.
The FRT is one of a number of ETF tests currently in use. Most of these include a parameter that, like the FRT Dilatory Efficiency, reflects the efficiency of muscle-assisted ET openings13-22. It is not known if these parameters are more or less predictive of disease recurrence in children with COME after their VTs are extruded than Dilatory Efficiency, but this possibility should be explored in future studies. Indeed, it may be possible, and perhaps expected, that combining the results for tests that capture different dimensions of mTVP-assisted ET opening will increase the specificity and sensitivity for identifying patients at risk for disease recurrence to clinically useful levels.
Because the FRT is almost exclusively used in our laboratories and, until recently, our primary focus was on the study of ETF in animal models of COME4,5, the underlying factors that contribute to the intra- and inter-ear variability in Dilatory Efficiency have not been explored. However, for other tests of ETF, both situational and constitutional factors were shown to influence their respective measures of muscle-assisted ET opening and we would expect the same to hold true for Dilatory Efficiency. Of the former, the most well documented is nasal inflammation caused by either upper respiratory virus infection, allergy or sinusitis which was shown to decrease the efficiency of muscle-assisted tubal openings by blocking the nasopharyngeal orifice of the ET and/or by extension of the inflammation to the ET mucosa8,17,23-25. In the present study, we did not test children when a cold-like illness was present and too few children were diagnosed with nasal allergy to determine if this known effect for other measures of ET opening function characterizes Dilatory Efficiency. The best supported constitutional factor is the extant degree of maturation of the ET system, For example, when compared to older children and adults, young children are characterized by poorer muscle-assisted ET openings15, the mTVP cross-sectional area is much smaller and the vector relationship between the mTVP muscle and the ET are less efficient26. This is an active area of current study by us where we are mapping the change in ETF as measured by the FRT onto the changes in the anatomy of the ET-middle ear system during growth and development. A large number of other factors have been suggested to affect mTVP-assisted tubal opening, but these remain largely hypothetical and without support in humans. For example, the possibility of a myogenic origin for poor mTVP function has been revisited over the years, but this condition appears to be extremely rare and, when present, related to nasopharyngeal tumors invading the mTVP or its nerve14,27,28. Similarly, intraluminal surfactants are expected to improve ET opening efficiency, but there is little evidence from studies in humans to support this contention29.
The full logistic regression model identified four factors that predict COME recurrence: low Dilatory Efficiency, a short duration of time with a patent VT, male gender and non-white race. The inclusion of these four factors in the regression model correctly assigned 82% of the Group II ears and 72% of the Group I ears, a sensitivity and specificity that approach values with clinical utility.
In retrospective studies, the longer the time that VTs remained patent was associated with a lower frequency of OM recurrence after the VTs became nonfunctional. Ahn and colleagues30 reviewed the medical records of 423 children who underwent VT insertion for COME and compared the duration of VT function between those who had undergone one VT procedure and those who had undergone three VT procedures. Mean “tube life” in the single-operation group was 13.6 months vs. 9.9 months in the 3-operation group. Yaman and colleagues31 reviewed a case series of 91 children with COME, and reported the highest rate of disease recurrence was in the group with the shortest time to VT extrusion: recurrence rates of 36.5%, 17.7% and 9.1% were observed in groups with VT patency for <6 months, 6-12 months and >12 months, respectively. These results support our findings and may reflect the relatively long period with an effusion-free middle ear required for mucosal healing within the tympanum and the mastoid during COME as previously reported32-34 or that the disease process underlying COME (e.g., inflammation, allergy) also contributes to early tube extrusion/nonfunctionality.
From our general model, but not the sub-models, males were more likely to have disease recurrence than females. This is not supported in the literature where studies by Ahn and colleagues, Yaman and colleagues and Boston and colleagues found no difference between males and females in disease recurrence30,31,35. However, these negative findings were reported for retrospective studies that did not control for potentially interactive factors or include the tightly scheduled, close prospective follow-up for recurrence used in the present study. For these reasons, the potential significance of our observation of a gender effect, if any, will need to await the results of future studies.
Our model identified “non-White” race as a risk factor for disease recurrence after VT extrusion, but there are few existing data to support or refute this observation. One suggestive retrospective review done by Boston and colleagues reported a greater number of VT insertions in Whites but their logistic model did not identify race as a contributing factor35. Again, our results on a racial effect must await future studies for confirmation or refutation.
Three retrospective studies reported that compared to VT insertion alone, adenoidectomy performed with VT insertion was associated with fewer later VT re-insertions35-37. Randomized studies by Maw and colleagues of children aged 2-11 years with COME38 and by Gates and colleagues of children aged 4-8 years with COME39 reported more favorable outcomes with respect to long-term disease resolution for groups treated with adenoidectomy and VT insertion when compared to VT insertion alone. In contrast, more recent randomized studies in younger children aged 12-48 months with recurrent acute OM or COME40 or in children aged 24-47 months with COME41 failed to document an increased benefit of adenoidectomy and VT insertion when compared to VT insertion alone. In the present study, we included within the regression model a variable representing no history of adenoidectomy, a past history of adenoidectomy or adenoidectomy concurrent with the VT insertion for the study endpoint. That variable was not a significant predictor of disease recurrence.
CONCLUSION
The results of the present study identified two robust predictors of COME recurrence after VTs inserted for COME in children are extruded: the length of time that the VT was patent and a measure of active, mTVP-assisted ET opening, the ET Dilatory Efficiency. Minor factors whose significance was lost for restrictive data sets were being male and being non-white, and both were positive predictors of disease recurrence. Adenoidectomy at the time of VT insertion or previous adenoidectomy, number of previous VTs inserted, the child's age at entry, and the ET opening and closing pressures were not significant predictors of disease recurrence. A limitation of the present study is the relatively small sample size which may have decreased our ability to detect significant predictors. Our finding that Dilatory Efficiency is a predictor of COME recurrence should be tested in other cohorts and for prediction of other disease outcomes to establish if this ETF parameter has applications in the clinical setting.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The investigators thank Ms. Juliane Banks, BA and Ms. Jenna El-Wagaa for processing the raw data. This study was supported in part by NIH Grant DC007667. William J. Doyle, PhD had full access to all the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.
Supported by: NIH Grant DC007667
Footnotes
Conflict of Interest: None of the authors have a conflict of interest to declare.
REFERENCES
- 1.Doyle W. Middle ear pressure regulation. In: Rosowski J, Merchant S, editors. The Function and Mechanics of Normal, Diseased and Reconstructed Middle Ears. Kugler Publications; The Hague, The Netherlands: 2000. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Bluestone CD, Doyle WJ. Anatomy and physiology of eustachian tube and middle ear related to otitis media. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1988 May;81(5 Pt 2):997–1003. doi: 10.1016/0091-6749(88)90168-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Graves G, Edwards L. The Eustachian Tube. Arch Otolaryngol. 1944 May;39(5):359–397. 1944. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Doyle WJ. Functional eustachian tube obstruction and otitis media in a primate model. A review. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl. 1984;414:52–57. doi: 10.3109/00016488409122882. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Casselbrant ML, Cantekin EI, Dirkmaat DC, Doyle WJ, Bluestone CD. Experimental paralysis of tensor veli palatini muscle. Acta Otolaryngol. 1988 Sep-Oct;106(3-4):178–185. doi: 10.3109/00016488809106423. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Bluestone CD. Studies in otitis media: Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh-University of Pittsburgh progress report--2004. Laryngoscope. 2004 Nov;114(11 Pt 3 Suppl 105):1–26. doi: 10.1097/01.mlg.0000148223.45374.ec. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Swarts JD, Bluestone CD. Eustachian tube function in older children and adults with persistent otitis media. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2003 Aug;67(8):853–859. doi: 10.1016/s0165-5876(03)00127-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Alper CM, Losee JE, Mandel EM, Seroky JT, Swarts JD, Doyle WJ. Postpalatoplasty eustachian tube function in young children with cleft palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2012 Jul;49(4):504–507. doi: 10.1597/11-065. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Casselbrant ML, Mandel EM, Seroky JT, Swarts JD, Doyle WJ. A pilot study of the ability of the forced response test to discriminate between 3-year-old children with chronic otitis media with effusion or with recurrent acute otitis media. Acta Otolaryngol. 2011 Nov;131(11):1150–1154. doi: 10.3109/00016489.2011.603137. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Falk B, Magnuson B. Evacuation of the middle ear by sniffing: a cause of high negative pressure and development of middle ear disease. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1984 Jun;92(3):312–318. doi: 10.1177/019459988409200313. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Falk B, Magnuson B. Eustachian tube closing failure in children with persistent middle ear effusion. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 1984 May;7(2):97–106. doi: 10.1016/s0165-5876(84)80034-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Cantekin EI, Saez CA, Bluestone CD, Bern SA. Airflow through the eustachian tube. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1979 Sep-Oct;88(5 Pt 1):603–612. doi: 10.1177/000348947908800504. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Williams PS. A tympanometric pressure swallow test for assessment of eustachian tube function. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1975 May-Jun;84(3 Pt 1):339–343. doi: 10.1177/000348947508400309. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Honjo I, Kumazawa T, Honda K, Shimojo S. Electromyographic study of patients with dysfunction of the Eustachian tube. Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 1979;222(1):47–51. doi: 10.1007/BF00456338. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Bylander A. Comparison of eustachian tube function in children and adults with normal ears. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl. 1980 May-Jun;89(3 Pt 2):20–24. doi: 10.1177/00034894800890s308. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.McBride TP, Derkay CS, Cunningham MJ, Doyle WJ. Evaluation of noninvasive eustachian tube function tests in normal adults. Laryngoscope. 1988 Jun;98(6 Pt 1):655–658. doi: 10.1288/00005537-198806000-00015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Beery QC, Doyle WJ, Cantekin EI, Bluestone CD. Longitudinal assessment of Eustachian tube function in children. Laryngoscope. 1979 Sep;89(9 Pt 1):1446–1456. doi: 10.1002/lary.5540890910. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Mathew GA, Kuruvilla G, Job A. Dynamic slow motion video endoscopy in eustachian tube assessment. Am J Otolaryngol. 2007 Mar-Apr;28(2):91–97. doi: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2006.06.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Takahashi H, Miura M, Honjo I, Fujita A. Cause of eustachian tube constriction during swallowing in patients with otitis media with effusion. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1996 Sep;105(9):724–728. doi: 10.1177/000348949610500910. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.van Heerbeek N, van der Avoort SJ, Zielhuis GA, Cremers CW. Sonotubometry: a useful tool to measure intra-individual changes in eustachian tube ventilatory function. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2007 Aug;133(8):763–766. doi: 10.1001/archotol.133.8.763. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Bhat VK, Kumar PR, Nag M, Hegde J. Comparison of a eustachian barotubometer with a tympanometer to evaluate eustachian tube function in chronic suppurative otitis media. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2009 Aug;38(4):456–461. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Handzel O, Poe D, Marchbanks RJ. Synchronous endoscopy and sonotubometry of the eustachian tube: a pilot study. Otol Neurotol. 2012 Feb;33(2):184–191. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e3182423242. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Sanyal MA, Henderson FW, Stempel EC, Collier AM, Denny FW. Effect of upper respiratory tract infection on eustachian tube ventilatory function in the preschool child. J Pediatr. 1980 Jul;97(1):11–15. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(80)80121-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Friedman RA, Doyle WJ, Casselbrant ML, Bluestone C, Fireman P. Immunologic-mediated eustachian tube obstruction: a double-blind crossover study. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1983 May;71(5):442–447. doi: 10.1016/0091-6749(83)90459-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Skoner DP, Doyle WJ, Fireman P. Eustachian tube obstruction (ETO) after histamine nasal provocation--a double-blind dose-response study. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1987 Jan;79(1):27–31. doi: 10.1016/s0091-6749(87)80012-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Doyle WJ, Swarts JD. Eustachian tube-tensor veli palatini muscle-cranial base relationships in children and adults: an osteological study. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2010 Sep;74(9):986–990. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2010.05.021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Su CY, Hsu SP, Chee CY. Electromyographic study of tensor and levator veli palatini muscles in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Implications for eustachian tube dysfunction. Cancer. 1993 Feb 15;71(4):1193–1200. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19930215)71:4<1193::aid-cncr2820710404>3.0.co;2-#. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Chang KH, Jun BC, Jeon EJ, Park YS. Functional evaluation of paratubal muscles using electromyography in patients with chronic unilateral tubal dysfunction. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2012 Jul 4; doi: 10.1007/s00405-012-2091-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Duplessis C, Fothergill D, Gertner J, Hughes L, Schwaller D. A pilot study evaluating surfactant on eustachian tube function in divers. Mil Med. 2008 Dec;173(12):1225–1232. doi: 10.7205/milmed.173.12.1225. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Ahn JH, Yoon TH, Pae KH, Kim TS, Chung JW, Lee KS. Clinical manifestations and risk factors of children receiving triple ventilating tube insertions for treatment of recurrent otitis media with effusion. Pediatrics. 2006 Jun;117(6):e1119–1123. doi: 10.1542/peds.2005-2520. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Yaman H, Yilmaz S, Guclu E, Subasi B, Alkan N, Ozturk O. Otitis media with effusion: recurrence after tympanostomy tube extrusion. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2010 Mar;74(3):271–274. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2009.11.035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Suetake M, Kobayashi T, Takasaka T, Shinkawa H. Is change in middle ear air volume following ventilation tube insertion a reliable prognostic indicator? Acta Otolaryngol Suppl. 1990;471:73–80. doi: 10.3109/00016489009124813. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Kiroglu F, Kaya M, Ozsahinoglu C, Soylu L, Polat S. Changes of middle ear mucosa in secretory otitis media treated with ventilation tubes. Acta Otolaryngol. 1990 Sep-Oct;110(3-4):266–273. doi: 10.3109/00016489009122547. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Aoki K, Mitani Y, Tuji T, Hamada Y, Utahashi H, Moriyama H. Relationship between severity of middle ear mucosal lesion and middle ear pneumatic space volume in patients with otitis media with effusion. Acta Otolaryngol. 1999;119(5):562–567. doi: 10.1080/00016489950180793. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Boston M, McCook J, Burke B, Derkay C. Incidence of and risk factors for additional tympanostomy tube insertion in children. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2003 Mar;129(3):293–296. doi: 10.1001/archotol.129.3.293. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Kadhim AL, Spilsbury K, Semmens JB, Coates HL, Lannigan FJ. Adenoidectomy for middle ear effusion: a study of 50,000 children over 24 years. Laryngoscope. 2007 Mar;117(3):427–433. doi: 10.1097/MLG.0b013e31802c938b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Coyte PC, Croxford R, McIsaac W, Feldman W, Friedberg J. The role of adjuvant adenoidectomy and tonsillectomy in the outcome of the insertion of tympanostomy tubes. N Engl J Med. 2001 Apr 19;344(16):1188–1195. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200104193441602. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Maw AR, Bawden R. Does adenoidectomy have an adjuvant effect on ventilation tube insertion and thus reduce the need for re-treatment? Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci. 1994 Aug;19(4):340–343. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2273.1994.tb01242.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Gates GA, Avery CA, Cooper JC, Jr., Prihoda TJ. Chronic secretory otitis media: effects of surgical management. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl. 1989 Jan;138:2–32. doi: 10.1177/00034894890981s202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Mattila PS, Hammaren-Malmi S, Pelkonen AS, et al. Effect of adenoidectomy on respiratory function: a randomised prospective study. Arch Dis Child. 2009 May;94(5):366–370. doi: 10.1136/adc.2008.145664. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Casselbrant ML, Mandel EM, Rockette HE, Kurs-Lasky M, Fall PA, Bluestone CD. Adenoidectomy for otitis media with effusion in 2-3-year-old children. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2009 Dec;73(12):1718–1724. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2009.09.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]