Abstract
p27Kip1 is a key cell-cycle regulator whose level is primarily regulated by the ubiquitin–proteasome degradation pathway. Its β1 subunit is one of seven β subunits that form the β-ring of the 20S proteasome, which is responsible for degradation of ubiquitinated proteins. We report here that the β1 subunit is up-regulated in oesophageal cancer tissues and some ovarian cancer cell lines. It promotes cell growth and migration, as well as colony formation. β1 binds and degrades p27Kip1directly. Interestingly, the lack of phosphorylation at Ser158 of the β1 subunit promotes degradation of p27Kip1. We therefore propose that the β1 subunit plays a novel role in tumorigenesis by degrading p27Kip1.
Keywords: degradation, p27Kip1, phosphorylation, tumorigenesis, β1 subunit
Abbreviations: CBB, Coomassie Brilliant Blue; CDK, cyclin-dependent kinase; GST, glutathione transferase; HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma; HEK-293T, HEK-293 cells expressing the large T-antigen of SV40 (simian virus 40); PKA, protein kinase A; Rb, retinoblastoma; Rfp, red fluorescent protein; RP, regulatory particle; shRNA, small hairpin RNA
INTRODUCTION
There are two main protein degradation machineries in eukaryotic cells, proteasomes and lysosomes [1]. The ubiquitin–26S proteasome-dependent proteolytic pathway plays important roles in many cellular processes by controlling levels of key molecules, which function in cell-cycle progression, antigen presentation, the secretory pathway and signal transduction, etc. [2]. The 26S proteasome is a large multi-subunit complex containing a 20S proteolytic CP (core particle) and a 19S RP (regulatory particle) [3]. The 20S proteasome comprises four heptameric stacked rings (α1-7/β1-7/β1-7/α1-7) and has chymotrypsin-like (β5), trypsin-like (β2) and caspase-like (β1) activities that cleave peptides after hydrophobic, basic and acidic residues, respectively [4]. The free 20S proteasome can mediate ubiquitin-independent degradation of proteins that are naturally unfolded or damaged [5,6].
The β1 subunit has caspase-like activity in the constitutively expressed mammalian proteasomal complex and is replaced by the IFNγ (interferon γ)-inducible subunit, β1i, in the immunoproteasome [7]. Most β-type subunits are synthesized as proproteins, which undergo limited proteolysis during proteasomal maturation [8–11]. The C-terminal extension of β7/Pre4 is required for the post-acidic activity mediated by the β1/Pre3 subunit and deletion of the C-terminal tail of β7/Pre4 inhibits β1/Pre3 propeptide processing and abrogation of post-acidic activity [12,13]. A mutant lacking both Blm10 and the C-terminal extension of β7/Pre4 grows extremely poorly, accumulates very high levels of precursor complexes and is impaired in β subunit maturation [14]. The processing of active eukaryotic β subunits is reported to be an ordered two-step mechanism involving autocatalysis [11,15].
Progression through the cell cycle requires the formation and activation of cyclin and CDK (cyclin-dependent kinase) complexes [16,17]. Activation of the G1phase cyclin-CDK complexes results in the phosphorylation of Rb (retinoblastoma) gene products which oppose cell-cycle progression by controlling gene expression mediated by E2F transcription factors [18]. CDKIs (CDK inhibitors), p21cip1, p27Kip1 and p15/p16ink4, regulate this process by inhibiting cyclin/CDK activity and phosphorylation of Rb, resulting in G1 arrest [17,19–21]. p27Kip1 is primarily expressed in the G0 phase of the cell cycle and regulates cell-cycle progression [22,23]. p27Kip1 specifically inhibits cyclin E/Cdk2 and cyclin A/Cdk2, two kinases necessary for DNA replication. When the levels of p27Kip1 decrease, Cdk2 is activated and cells enter S phase [24]. Regulation of cellular levels of p27Kip1 is therefore one of key points in cell-cycle control. Two post-translational mechanisms were proposed to be involved in p27Kip1 breakdown: (a) ubiquitinated p27Kip1 is recognized and destroyed by the proteasome [25,26], or (b) the N-terminus of non-ubiquitinated p27Kip1 is rapidly cleaved to remove its cyclin-binding domain, a process that is ATP-dependent with high activity in the S phase [27]. In addition, B-lymphoid cells have caspase or caspase-like activities that are inversely regulated with respect to p27Kip1 abundance and this activity cleaves a caspase recognition site present in p27Kip1 (DPSD139) [28]. Tambyrajah et al. recently used a tetra-peptide substrate, Ac-DPSD-AMC, to mimic a target cleavage site in p27Kip1 and traced this activity to the β1 subunit of the 20S proteasome [29]. Nevertheless, this tetra-peptide substrate may not adequately represent the p27Kip1 protein. Whether β1 binds and degrades p27Kip1 directly remains unknown.
In the 20S proteasomal phosphoproteome, Ser157 in murine β1 (158 in human) has been suggested to be a PKA (protein kinase A) phosphorylation site [30]. However, the biological significance of this possible phosphorylation is unknown.
We observed that the β1 subunit is up-regulated in oesophageal cancer tissues and some ovarian cancer cell lines. It promotes cell growth, colony formation and migration. Interestingly, β1 binds and degrades p27Kip1directly and the phosphorylation of β1 at Ser158 plays a key role in the degradation of p27Kip1. We thus present here a novel role of β1 subunit in tumorigenesis.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Construction of β1 and p27Kip1 expression plasmids
Plasmids were constructed using standard recombinant technique as described previously [31]. The propeptide of β1 subunit (34 amino acids in the N-terminal domain of β1 zymogen) was deleted and the active sites (Thr35 and Thr36) were therefore exposed [10]. This truncated β1 was subcloned into a pGEX 4T2 vector [GST (glutathione transferase)-β1] and pDsRed1-C1 vector (Rfp-β1), whereas the full-length β1 coding sequence was subcloned into pET 28a vector (β1–His6). The sequences of primers and the description of plasmids were summarized in Table 1. DNA fragments encoding both β1 shRNA (small hairpin RNA) and control shRNA were subcloned into the vector pGenesil-1.0. Both siRNA (small interfering RNA) sequences of PSMβ6 (proteasomal subunit β type 6) were used in this study: siβ1-1, aatcgagtgactgacaagctg and siβ1-2, aatgctctcgctttggccatg, respectively. A plasmid to express RNA without homology to human or mouse sequences was used as a control in silencing experiments [31].
Table 1. Primers used in the present study.
Plasmid | 5′ primer oligo | 3′ primer oligo | Restriction enzyme sites |
---|---|---|---|
Wild-type β1 | |||
pβ1-GST | CGCggatccACCACTATCATGGCC | CCGgaattcCGGCGGGTGGTAAAGT | BamHI/EcoRI |
pβ1-His6 | CGCggatccACCTTACTAGCTGCT | CCGgaattcGGCGGGTGGTAAAG | BamHI/EcoRI |
pβ1-Rfp | CCGgaattcCACCACTATCATGGCC | CGCggatccGGCGGGTGGTAAAGTG | EcoRI/BamHI |
Point-mutations in β1 | |||
pβ1-His6 S158E | TGATGGTAAGGCAGGAATTTGCCATTGG | AGCCTCCAATGGCAAATTCCTGCCTTAC | |
pβ1- His6 S158A | TGATGGTAAGGCAGGCCTTTGCCATTGG | AGCCTCCAATGGCAAAGGCCTGCCTTAC | |
Wild-type p27Kip1 | |||
pp27Kip1-GST | CGCggatccATGTCAAACGTGCGAGTGTCT | CCGctcgagTTTACGTTTGACGTCTTCTGAG | BamHI/XhoI |
pp27Kip1- His6 | CGCggatccATGTCAAACGTGCGAGTGTCT | CCGctcgagTTTACGTTTGACGTCTTCTGAG | BamHI/XhoI |
Cell culture
HeLa and HEK-293T [HEK-293 cells expressing the large T-antigen of SV40 (simian virus 40)] cells (obtained from A.T.C.C.) were grown in DMEM (Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium) supplemented with 10% (v/v) FBS, 100 units/ml penicillin, 100 units/ml streptomycin at 37°C, 5% (v/v) CO2. Establishment of stably transfected HeLa cells was performed as described previously [32]. Cell proliferation was determined by counting the cell numbers with a haemocytometer at the indicated times after plating cells into 24-well plates for 2 h. Data represent an average of three independent experiments. As previously described [33], HeLa cells were synchronized at G0/G1 by serum starvation for 48 h and then stimulated to re-enter the cell cycle by serum re-addition. Synchronization was monitored by the Coulter EPICS XL cytometer (Beckman Coulter Inc.) using PI (propidium iodide) staining [34].
Crystal violet staining
The plates or dishes were placed on ice and washed twice with ice-cold 1× PBS. Cells were then fixed with ice-cold 100% (v/v) methanol for 10 min. After aspiration of the methanol, 0.5% (w/v) crystal violet solution (in 25% (v/v) methanol and stored at room temperature (25°C) was added and incubated at room temperature for 10 min. After rinsing repeatedly with water, the plates were allowed to dry at room temperature and then photographed.
Cell migration assays
Migration assays were performed using Transwells (8-μm pore size, Corning Costar) without Matrigel™, according to manufacture's instructions. Cells were allowed to migrate for 12 h at 37°C. The Transwell inserts were fixed in 10% (v/v) formalin, stained with filtered 0.5% (w/v) crystal violet in 10% (v/v) ethanol and then washed in deionized water. The non-migratory cells on the upper surfaces of the membranes were removed using cotton swabs. The membranes were air-dried and mounted for microscopy. For each chamber, the migrating cells in ten randomly chosen fields (×400) were counted.
Scratch wound assays were performed using a p200 pipette tip to create a ‘scratch.’ After washing the cells with 1 ml of growth medium, they were recultured with 1 ml of medium and photographed at regular intervals to monitor cell migration.
Human tumour samples
Human oesophageal cancer tissue samples were obtained from Zhongshan Hospital of Xiamen University. Informed consent was obtained from the donors regarding the use of resected tumours for research purposes. The research has been carried out in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki (2008) of the World Medical Association, that the Ethical Committee of the Institution in which the work was performed has approved it and that the subjects have given informed consent to the work.
Immunohistochemistry
Tissue sections were prepared from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded specimens of human cancers. Immunohistochemical analysis was performed as described previously [35] using a mouse monoclonal antibody against β1 (#sc-100455) and Rpt3 (Proteintech Group, Inc.).
Preparation of tissue lysates
For whole protein extracts and Western blot analysis of β1, tissues was homogenized in lysis buffer (10 mM Tris pH 7.5, 10 mM NaCl, 0.1 mM EDTA, 0.5% (v/v) Triton X-100, 0.02% (w/v) NaN3, 0.2 mM PMSF) containing Complete™, a protease inhibitor cocktail (# 05892791001, Roche), incubated for 30 min on ice, and then centrifuged for 30 min at 12 000 g. The supernatant was saved for Western blot analysis. Protein concentrations were determined by the Bradford assay with BSA as standard [36].
Analysis of protein–protein interactions
Both GST-tagged β1 and p27Kip1 and His6-tagged β1 and p27Kip1 were overexpressed by IPTG) induction in bacteria as described previously [31]. For detection of their interactions, the blot was probed with an anti-His6 antibody (# sc-803) or an anti-p27Kip1 antibody (# sc-1641) and detected by ECL. Immunoprecipitation analysis was performed as described previously [31]. In brief, 5×106 cells synchronized at G0/G1 phase were lysed in lysis buffer [50 mM Hepes-NaOH (pH 7.5), 100 mM NaCl, 0.5% (v/v) Nonidet P40, 2.5 mM EDTA, 10% (v/v) glycerol, 1 mM and 1 mM PMSF]. Samples were precleared by incubation with protein G-plus-agarose beads (#sc2002) at 4°C for 1 h and then received 1 μg of a monoclonal antibody against GFP (#sc-9996), p27Kip1 (#sc-1641) or 1 μg of β1 (#sc-100455) along with 10 μl of protein G-plus-agarose at 4°C for 4 h. Agarose beads were washed with lysis buffer and suspended in SDS/PAGE sample buffer. After SDS/PAGE, samples were analysed by Western blotting using corresponding antibodies for β1 (#sc-100455) and p27Kip1 (#sc-1641). 10% of each total lysate was loaded as input and 25% of each bound sample was loaded for each Western blot analysis.
In vitro/in vivo degradation assays
In vitro and in vivo degradation assays were partly modified from those described previously [27]. Briefly, His6-tagged p27Kip1 or its mutants and His6-tagged β1 protein or its mutants were expressed in Escherichia coli BL21 and purified using Ni Sepharose™ 6 Fast Flow. 1 μg of purified p27Kip1-His6 or its mutants and 2 μg β1-His6 or its mutants were mixed together at 37°C in 50 μl of degradation buffer [20 mM Hepes pH 7.2 or pH 6.5, 100 mM NaCl, 10% (w/v) sucrose, 1% (v/v) CHAPS, 10 mM DTT and 1 mM EDTA] plus 2 mM ATP and 5 mM MgCl2. The reactions were carried out at 37°C for different periods of time, terminated by adding SDS-gel loading buffer, and each reaction mixture was subjected to SDS/PAGE on a 12% (w/v) gel, followed by immunoblotting with either an anti-p27Kip1 or anti-β1 antibody.
RESULTS
The expression of β1 subunit is up-regulated in human tumour tissues and cells
As the expression of β1 subunit was observed to be up-regulated in diethylnitrosamine-treated mouse livers and in human HCC (hepatocellular carcinoma) tissues [37] and the β1 subunit has caspase activity that could degrade the key cell-cycle regulator, p27Kip1 [29,38], we speculated that the expression of β1 is up-regulated in other tumour tissues or cells. We therefore performed immunohistochemical staining of some paraffin-embedded oesophageal cancer tissue specimens using an antibody against β1 protein. Like in HCC samples [37], the expression of β1 is obviously up-regulated in oesophageal cancer tissues compared with its adjacent normal tissues (Figure 1A). By contrast, expression of Rpt3, a component of the 19S RP of the 26S proteasome, was not up-regulated in oesophageal cancer tissues or in its adjacent normal tissues (Figure 1A). Moreover, expression of β1 subunit was increased in several ovarian cancer cell lines (4/5 cell lines) when compared with a normal ovarian cell lines (NOE cell line) (Figure 1B).
β1 promotes cell proliferation
Since the expression of the β1 subunit is up-regulated in human tumour tissues and cells, it is of great interest to ask whether β1 is a potential onco-protein that promotes cell proliferation and migration. To this end, we established two stably transfected HeLa cell lines expressing the Rfp (red fluorescent protein) or β1 tagged with Rfp (β1-Rfp), respectively. As shown in Figure 2(A), cells expressing ectopic β1 grew three-time faster than cells expressing only Rfp. Moreover, overexpression of ectopic β1 significantly increased colony formation, a hallmark of transformation (Figure 2B). To see whether β1 can promote the proliferation of other cell lines, a plasmid expressing β1-Rfp or Rfp was transiently transfected into HepG2 cells and cells were cultured with Gly418 at 0.5 mg/ml for 10 days before staining with crystal violet as described under the ‘Materials and methods’ section. As shown in Figure 2(C), β1 can also promote colony formation ability of HepG2 cells (over 60%).
β1 promotes cell migration
To test whether β1 can promote cell migration, Transwells were used to assay the migration ability of stably transfected HeLa cells. As shown in Figure 3(A), the number of migrated cells expressing ectopic β1 was evidently more than twice that of the control cells. Cell migration was also assessed by overexpressing β1 in HEK-293T cells with an in vitro scratch assay. Dynamic images of the scratch were acquired and the width of the scratch was measured as a function of time (Figure 3B). These results suggest that β1 may be a novel onco-protein, which promotes cell migration.
β1 interacts with p27Kip1 in vivo and in vitro
Although a recent study showed that β1 has caspase activity and can degrade p27Kip1 [29], the mechanism of this degradation is unknown. To investigate this process, we tested possible interactions between β1 and p27Kip1 using immunoprecipitation and the GST-pull-down protocols. First, we detected the possible interaction of endogenous β1 subunit and p27Kip1 in vivo. As shown in Figure 4(A), endogenous β1 and p27Kip1 in the precipitated complex were detected by an anti-β1 or anti-p27Kip1 antibody, respectively, and both precipitated β1 and p27Kip1 showed a remarkably efficient binding for each other. This suggests that β1 interacts with p27Kip1in vivo. As the α7 subunit is one of the constituent subunits of the 20S proteasome and it interacts with β1 in vivo [3,39], we next checked whether α7 was co-precipitated with β1. In Figure 4(B), the α7 subunit was found to be precipitated with β1. To test whether β1 interacts with p27Kip1 directly, we used a GST-pull-down assay. As shown in Figure 4(C), His6-tagged β1 can bind with p27Kip1–GST, which was detected by both anti-β1 and anti-His6 antibodies. Interestingly, when the β1-GST fusion protein was incubated with purified p27Kip1–His6, both anti-p27Kip1 and anti-His6 antibodies were also able to detect p27Kip1 (Figure 4D), suggesting that β1 and p27Kip1 interact with each other directly in vitro.
β1 degrades p27Kip1 directly
We first tested whether overexpression of ectopic β1 could reduce the amount of endogenous p27Kip1. HeLa cells stably expressing either β1-Rfp or Rfp were synchronized at G0 phase [33]. After lysis, the amount of endogenous p27Kip1 was determined by immunoblotting. As shown in Figure 5(A), the level of p27Kip1 in cells expressing β1-Rfp was significantly lower than for cells expressing free Rfp, but the level of α7 subunit was little affected when β1 was overexpressed in the stable cell lines. To further confirm the function of β1 in degrading p27Kip1, plasmids expressing either control shRNAs or β1 shRNAs were expressed in HeLa cells. The amount of p27Kip1 in cells expressing β1 shRNAs was higher than in cells expressing the control shRNAs (Figure 5B). Interestingly, the level of the α7 subunit was also reduced when β1 was down-regulated (Figure 5B). We conclude that some essential subunits of proteasome including α7 subunit could be affected by the down-regulation of β1 and that the increased steady-state levels of p27Kip1 result from malfunction of proteasome [40] or down-regulating of β1.
To learn whether β1 alone can degrade p27Kip1, we set up an in vitro degradation assay that was partly modified from those described [27]. Briefly, 1 μg of purified p27Kip1–His6 and 2 μg of purified β1-His6 were mixed in 50 μl of degradation buffer at 37°C for increasing periods of time. We observed that the amount of p27Kip1 gradually decreased with time: nearly 40% was degraded after 90 min (Figure 5C). Since β1 was reported to have caspase-like activity [29,30], it is important to use further optimized conditions to study degradation of p27Kip1. Thus, as shown in Figure 5(D), p27Kip1 totally disappeared in incubations at pH 6.5 and a mobility shift of β1 band was also observed. Since β1 has a propeptide in its N-terminal domain [10], we hypothesized that β1 would be activated at pH 6.5. To test this hypothesis, p27Kip1–His6 and β1–His6 were mixed in the reaction buffer at pH 6.5 and for increasing periods of time (Figure 5E). The amount of p27Kip1 dramatically decreased with time as β1 started to self-cleave. Control His6-tagged p53 showed almost no change under the same conditions change (Figure 5F). The 20S proteasome is a threonine protease and its active sites are located in the N-terminal domain of β subunits. When β1 starts to self-cleave, its propeptide (34 amino acids at the N-terminal domain of the zymogen) is deleted and the active sites (Thr35 and Thr36) are therefore exposed. Deletion of the N-terminal threonine or mutating it to alanine led to inactivation of the proteasome [10]. We mutated two threonines into alanines in the N-terminal of β1–His6 (T35A/T36A) and found that this double mutation significantly weakened not only the interaction between β1 and p27Kip1 but also the ability of β1 to degrade p27Kip1 (Figure 5G). These results suggest that only cleavable and active β1 can bind and degrade p27Kip1 directly.
Dephosphorylation of β1 at Ser158 enhances its ability to bind and degrade p27Kip1
Ser157 in murine β1 (158 in human) has been suggested to be a PKA phosphorylation site, but its function is largely unknown [30]. Whether PKA phosphorylation of β1 regulates its role in degradation of p27Kip1 is an open question. To this end, two mutants of β1 were constructed: β1 S158A, to prevent the phosphorylation of β1 at Ser158, and β1 S158E, to mimic phosphorylation of β1 at Ser158 [41–44]. In an interaction assay shown in Figure 6(A), mutation of S158E greatly weakened the interaction between β1 and p27Kip1, but mutation of S158A shows an enhanced interaction of β1 with p27Kip1. To understand whether phosphorylation of β1 at Ser158 regulates its role in the degradation of p27Kip1, we compared the protein level of endogenous p27Kip1 in cells expressing Rfp, β1–Rfp, β1–Rfp S158A or β1–Rfp S158E, respectively and found that the amount of endogenous p27Kip1 in cells expressing β1 or β1 S158A was less than in cells expressing ectopic β1 S158E (Figure 6B). These results suggest that dephosphorylation of β1 at Ser158 enhances its ability to degrade p27Kip1.
As p27Kip1 regulates cell cycle progression, it is of great interest to ask whether phosphorylation of β1 regulates cell proliferation. To this end, the growth of cells expressing β1 S158A was compared with the growth of cells expressing β1 S158E. As shown in Figure 6(C), cells expressing β1 S158A grew faster than cells expressing β1 S158E (over 50%).
Taken together, these data suggest that phosphorylation of β1 at Ser158 prevents its binding and degradation of p27Kip1, whereas dephosphorylation of β1 at Ser158 increases its ability to bind and degrade p27Kip1, thus promoting cell proliferation.
DISCUSSION
In vivo measurements show that most of tumours exhibit a significantly acidic pH when compared with normal tissues [45,46]. Increased glycolysis, a trait almost invariably observed in human cancers, confers a selective growth advantage on transformed cells because it allows them to create an environment that is differentially toxic to normal cells [45]. We found that β1 can be activated at pH 6.5 that β1 can promote cell proliferation and migration, and that it is up-regulated in oesophageal cancer tissues, HCC tissues [37] and some ovarian cancer cell lines. The weakly acidic environment of tumour tissues and transformed cells may facilitate the activation of the β1 proenzyme and therefore increase the ability of β1 to degrade its relevant substrates, such as p27Kip1.
CyclinE/Cdk2 activity promotes S phase transition by p27Kip1degradation [47]. CyclinD/Cdk4, 6 promotes cell cycle progression in early G1 to late G1 [48,49]. p27Kip1 inhibits the activities of these kinases directly by binding to them negatively regulates cell-cycle progression [24,27], and therefore plays a pivotal role in the control of cell proliferation [50]. The stability of p27Kip1 has been of recurrent interest. Several degradation mechanisms have been proposed, including ubiquitination-dependent pathways [26], the ubiquitination-independent pathways [27], a caspase-mediated pathway [51,52] and the Jab1-dependent pathway [53]. In this study, we found that β1 has a novel role in promoting cell proliferation by directly binding and degrading p27Kip1. As p27Kip1 plays a central role in controlling cell proliferation [54–56], and is intimately involved in cell death [52,57], it is not surprising that expression of p27Kip1 is tightly regulated by multiple mechanisms.
Overexpression of either the β1 or β5 subunit enhanced proteasomal activity and up-regulates the other proteasomal subunits [58–60]. However, Gaczynska et al. demonstrated that cells transfected with β1 and β5 subunits have elevated levels of only some proteasomal activities and that the total cellular content of proteasomes does not differ significantly between control and transfected cells [60]. The discrepancy regarding the proteasomal activities and the cellular content of proteasomes in β1- and β5-transfected HeLa and WI38/T cells is possibly caused by different cell lines [59]. In the present study, we observe that the proteasomal α7 subunit does not change significantly when β1 was overexpressed in stable HeLa cell lines. As the α7 subunit interacts with β1 in vivo [3,39], we infer that the structure and function of the proteasome are not greatly affected by overexpression of β1 subunit, but can be impaired upon knock-down of β1 expression. Since the relative stoichiometry of proteasomal subunits is controlled by an autoregulatory mechanism that mediates differential poly-ubiquitination and degradation of multiple subunits [61,62], we suggest that overexpression of β1 should not increase the integration of β1 into proteasomes. Nevertheless, reduction of the level of constitutive subunits (e.g. β1) would affect both the structure and the function of the proteasomal complex.
Ubiquitin-dependent degradation of p27Kip1 requires the poly-ubiquitination of p27Kip1 and other cellular proteins [Skp2 [33], Jab1 [53], etc.] and therefore needs significant time to react to external stimuli. Our data demonstrate that phosphorylation of β1 at Ser158 prevents its direct binding and degradation of p27Kip1 while dephosphorylation of β1 at Ser158 increases its ability to bind and degrade p27Kip1. PKA may play a key role in regulation of β1 and p27Kip1. Thus, phosphorylation and dephosphorylation of β1 could facilitate rapid adjustment of the level of p27Kip1. Further research will be required to address this possibility.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
We are grateful to Alan Tartakoff of Case Western Reserve University for his critical suggestions prior to submission.
AUTHOR CONTRIBUTION
Fuqiang Yuan, Tao Tao and Qilin Ma designed the study and wrote the paper. Fuqiang Yuan, Yana Ma, Pan You and Wenbo Lin performed experiments. Haojie Lu, Yinhua Yu, Xiaomin Wang, Jie Jiang and Pengyuan Yang were involved in the conception and design of the project, in the analysis and interpretation of the results and in writing the paper.
FUNDING
This work was supported by the National Science Foundation of China [grant number 81071670] and the Department of Science and Technology, Fujian Province, China [grant number 2009I0026] (to T.T.). Q.M. was supported the Xiamen Center for Brain Research, China [grant number NK5888].
References
- 1.Ding W. X., Yin X. M. Sorting, recognition and activation of the misfolded protein degradation pathways through macroautophagy and the proteasome. Autophagy. 2008;4:141–150. doi: 10.4161/auto.5190. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Glickman M. H., Ciechanover A. The ubiquitin-proteasome proteolytic pathway: destruction for the sake of construction. Physiol. Rev. 2002;82:373–428. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00027.2001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Chen C., Huang C., Chen S., Liang J., Lin W., Ke G., Zhang H., Wang B., Huang J., Han Z., et al. Subunit–subunit interactions in the human 26S proteasome. Proteomics. 2008;8:508–520. doi: 10.1002/pmic.200700588. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Wojcik C., Di Napoli M. Ubiquitin-proteasome system and proteasome inhibition: new strategies in stroke therapy. Stroke. 2004;35:1506–1518. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000126891.93919.4e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Kong X., Lin Z., Liang D., Fath D., Sang N., Caro J. Histone deacetylase inhibitors induce VHL and ubiquitin-independent proteasomal degradation of hypoxia-inducible factor 1alpha. Mol. Cell Biol. 2006;26:2019–2028. doi: 10.1128/MCB.26.6.2019-2028.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Asher G., Tsvetkov P., Kahana C., Shaul Y. A mechanism of ubiquitin-independent proteasomal degradation of the tumor suppressors p53 and p73. Genes Dev. 2005;19:316–321. doi: 10.1101/gad.319905. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Ciechanover A., Schwartz A. L. The ubiquitin-proteasome pathway: the complexity and myriad functions of proteins death. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1998;95:2727–2730. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.6.2727. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Frentzel S., Pesold-Hurt B., Seelig A., Kloetzel P. M. 20 S proteasomes are assembled via distinct precursor complexes. Processing of LMP2 and LMP7 proproteins takes place in 13–16 S preproteasome complexes. J. Mol. Biol. 1994;236:975–981. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(94)90003-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Chen P., Hochstrasser M. Biogenesis, structure and function of the yeast 20S proteasome. EMBO J. 1995;14:2620–2630. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1995.tb07260.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Seemuller E., Lupas A., Stock D., Lowe J., Huber R., Baumeister W. Proteasome from Thermoplasma acidophilum: a threonine protease. Science. 1995;268:579–582. doi: 10.1126/science.7725107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Schmidtke G., Kraft R., Kostka S., Henklein P., Frommel C., Lowe J., Huber R., Kloetzel P. M., Schmidt M. Analysis of mammalian 20S proteasome biogenesis: the maturation of beta-subunits is an ordered two-step mechanism involving autocatalysis. EMBO J. 1996;15:6887–6898. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Ramos P. C., Marques A. J., London M. K., Dohmen R. J. Role of C-terminal extensions of subunits beta2 and beta7 in assembly and activity of eukaryotic proteasomes. J. Biol. Chem. 2004;279:14323–14330. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M308757200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Groll M., Ditzel L., Lowe J., Stock D., Bochtler M., Bartunik H. D., Huber R. Structure of 20S proteasome from yeast at 2.4 A resolution. Nature. 1997;386:463–471. doi: 10.1038/386463a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Marques A. J., Glanemann C., Ramos P. C., Dohmen R. J. The C-terminal extension of the beta7 subunit and activator complexes stabilize nascent 20 S proteasomes and promote their maturation. J. Biol. Chem. 2007;282:34869–34876. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M705836200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Seemuller E., Lupas A., Baumeister W. Autocatalytic processing of the 20S proteasome. Nature. 1996;382:468–471. doi: 10.1038/382468a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Sherr C. J. Cancer cell cycles. Science. 1996;274:1672–1677. doi: 10.1126/science.274.5293.1672. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Wakino S., Kintscher U., Kim S., Yin F., Hsueh W. A., Law R. E. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma ligands inhibit retinoblastoma phosphorylation and G1→ S transition in vascular smooth muscle cells. J. Biol. Chem. 2000;275:22435–22441. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M910452199. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Nevins J. R., Leone G., DeGregori J., Jakoi L. Role of the Rb/E2F pathway in cell growth control. J. Cell. Physiol. 1997;173:233–236. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4652(199711)173:2<233::AID-JCP27>3.0.CO;2-F. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Xiong Y., Hannon G. J., Zhang H., Casso D., Kobayashi R., Beach D. p21 is a universal inhibitor of cyclin kinases. Nature. 1993;366:701–704. doi: 10.1038/366701a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Toyoshima H., Hunter T. p27, a novel inhibitor of G1 cyclin-Cdk protein kinase activity, is related to p21. Cell. 1994;78:67–74. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90573-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Serrano M., Hannon G. J., Beach D. A new regulatory motif in cell-cycle control causing specific inhibition of cyclin D/CDK4. Nature. 1993;366:704–707. doi: 10.1038/366704a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Hengst L., Dulic V., Slingerland J. M., Lees E., Reed S. I. A cell cycle-regulated inhibitor of cyclin-dependent kinases. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1994;91:5291–5295. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.12.5291. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Lee J. G., Kay E. P. Involvement of two distinct ubiquitin E3 ligase systems for p27 degradation in corneal endothelial cells. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2008;49:189–196. doi: 10.1167/iovs.07-0855. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Montagnoli A., Fiore F., Eytan E., Carrano A. C., Draetta G. F., Hershko A., Pagano M. Ubiquitination of p27 is regulated by Cdk-dependent phosphorylation and trimeric complex formation. Genes Dev. 1999;13:1181–1189. doi: 10.1101/gad.13.9.1181. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Piva R., Cancelli I., Cavalla P., Bortolotto S., Dominguez J., Draetta G. F., Schiffer D. Proteasome-dependent degradation of p27/kip1 in gliomas. J. Neuropathol. Exp. Neurol. 1999;58:691–696. doi: 10.1097/00005072-199907000-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Pagano M., Tam S. W., Theodoras A. M., Beer-Romero P., Del Sal G., Chau V., Yew P. R., Draetta G. F., Rolfe M. Role of the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway in regulating abundance of the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor p27. Science. 1995;269:682–685. doi: 10.1126/science.7624798. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Shirane M., Harumiya Y., Ishida N., Hirai A., Miyamoto C., Hatakeyama S., Nakayama K., Kitagawa M. Down-regulation of p27(Kip1) by two mechanisms, ubiquitin-mediated degradation and proteolytic processing. J. Biol. Chem. 1999;274:13886–13893. doi: 10.1074/jbc.274.20.13886. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Frost V., Delikat S., Al-Mehairi S., Sinclair A. J. Regulation of p27KIP1 in Epstein-Barr virus-immortalized lymphoblastoid cell lines involves non-apoptotic caspase cleavage. J. Gen. Virol. 2001;82:3057–3066. doi: 10.1099/0022-1317-82-12-3057. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Tambyrajah W. S., Bowler L. D., Medina-Palazon C., Sinclair A. J. Cell cycle-dependent caspase-like activity that cleaves p27(KIP1) is the beta(1) subunit of the 20S proteasome. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2007;466:186–193. doi: 10.1016/j.abb.2007.07.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Lu H., Zong C., Wang Y., Young G. W., Deng N., Souda P., Li X., Whitelegge J., Drews O., Yang P. Y., Ping P. Revealing the dynamics of the 20 S proteasome phosphoproteome: a combined CID and electron transfer dissociation approach. Mol. Cell. Proteomics. 2008;7:2073–2089. doi: 10.1074/mcp.M800064-MCP200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Lin W., Ye W., Cai L., Meng X., Ke G., Huang C., Peng Z., Yu Y., Golden J. A., Tartakoff A. M., Tao T. The roles of multiple importins for nuclear import of murine aristaless-related homeobox protein. J. Biol. Chem. 2009;284:20428–20439. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M109.004242. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Liu M., Dai B., Kang S. H., Ban K., Huang F. J., Lang F. F., Aldape K. D., Xie T. X., Pelloski C. E., Xie K., et al. FoxM1B is overexpressed in human glioblastomas and critically regulates the tumorigenicity of glioma cells. Cancer Res. 2006;66:3593–3602. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-2912. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Carrano A. C., Eytan E., Hershko A., Pagano M. SKP2 is required for ubiquitin-mediated degradation of the CDK inhibitor p27. Nat. Cell Biol. 1999;1:193–199. doi: 10.1038/12013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Jin Z., Dicker D. T., El-Deiry W. S. Enhanced sensitivity of G1 arrested human cancer cells suggests a novel therapeutic strategy using a combination of simvastatin and TRAIL. Cell Cycle. 2002;1:82–89. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Arlt A., Bauer I., Schafmayer C., Tepel J., Muerkoster S. S., Brosch M., Roder C., Kalthoff H., Hampe J., Moyer M. P., et al. Increased proteasome subunit protein expression and proteasome activity in colon cancer relate to an enhanced activation of nuclear factor E2-related factor 2 (Nrf2) Oncogene. 2009;28:3983–3996. doi: 10.1038/onc.2009.264. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Schafer T., Scheuer C., Roemer K., Menger M. D., Vollmar B. Inhibition of p53 protects liver tissue against endotoxin-induced apoptotic and necrotic cell death. FASEB J. 2003;17:660–667. doi: 10.1096/fj.02-0774com. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Yuan F., Lu J., You P., Yang Z., Yang P., Ma Q., Tao T. Proteomic profiling of expression of proteasomal subunits from livers of mice treated with diethylnitrosamine. Proteomics. 2013;13:389–397. doi: 10.1002/pmic.201200288. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Albrecht J. H., Poon R. Y., Ahonen C. L., Rieland B. M., Deng C., Crary G. S. Involvement of p21 and p27 in the regulation of CDK activity and cell cycle progression in the regenerating liver. Oncogene. 1998;16:2141–2150. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1201728. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Rual J. F., Venkatesan K., Hao T., Hirozane-Kishikawa T., Dricot A., Li N., Berriz G. F., Gibbons F. D., Dreze M., Ayivi-Guedehoussou N., et al. Towards a proteome-scale map of the human protein–protein interaction network. Nature. 2005;437:1173–1178. doi: 10.1038/nature04209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Hara T., Kamura T., Nakayama K., Oshikawa K., Hatakeyama S. Degradation of p27(Kip1) at the G(0)-G(1) transition mediated by a Skp2-independent ubiquitination pathway. J. Biol. Chem. 2001;276:48937–48943. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M107274200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Morrison L. E., Hoover H. E., Thuerauf D. J., Glembotski C. C. Mimicking phosphorylation of alphaB-crystallin on serine-59 is necessary and sufficient to provide maximal protection of cardiac myocytes from apoptosis. Circ. Res. 2003;92:203–211. doi: 10.1161/01.res.0000052989.83995.a5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Chetkovich D. M., Chen L., Stocker T. J., Nicoll R. A., Bredt D. S. Phosphorylation of the postsynaptic density-95 (PSD-95)/discs large/zona occludens-1 binding site of stargazin regulates binding to PSD-95 and synaptic targeting of AMPA receptors. J. Neurosci. 2002;22:5791–5796. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.22-14-05791.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Iglesias T., Waldron R. T., Rozengurt E. Identification of in vivo phosphorylation sites required for protein kinase D activation. J. Biol. Chem. 1998;273:27662–27667. doi: 10.1074/jbc.273.42.27662. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Cobb M. H., Goldsmith E. J. How MAP kinases are regulated. J. Biol. Chem. 1995;270:14843–14846. doi: 10.1074/jbc.270.25.14843. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Gatenby R. A., Gawlinski E. T., Gmitro A. F., Kaylor B., Gillies R. J. Acid-mediated tumor invasion: a multidisciplinary study. Cancer Res. 2006;66:5216–5223. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-4193. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Cairns R., Papandreou I., Denko N. Overcoming physiologic barriers to cancer treatment by molecularly targeting the tumor microenvironment. Mol. Cancer Res. 2006;4:61–70. doi: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-06-0002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Liu E., Li X., Yan F., Zhao Q., Wu X. Cyclin-dependent kinases phosphorylate human Cdt1 and induce its degradation. J. Biol. Chem. 2004;279:17283–17288. doi: 10.1074/jbc.C300549200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Ezhevsky S. A., Nagahara H., Vocero-Akbani A. M., Gius D. R., Wei M. C., Dowdy S. F. Hypo-phosphorylation of the retinoblastoma protein (pRb) by cyclin D:Cdk4/6 complexes results in active pRb. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1997;94:10699–10704. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.20.10699. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Obaya A. J., Kotenko I., Cole M. D., Sedivy J. M. The proto-oncogene c-myc acts through the cyclin-dependent kinase (Cdk) inhibitor p27(Kip1) to facilitate the activation of Cdk4/6 and early G(1) phase progression. J. Biol. Chem. 2002;277:31263–31269. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M202528200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Polyak K., Lee M. H., Erdjument-Bromage H., Koff A., Roberts J. M., Tempst P., Massague J. Cloning of p27Kip1, a cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor and a potential mediator of extracellular antimitogenic signals. Cell. 1994;78:59–66. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90572-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Loubat A., Rochet N., Turchi L., Rezzonico R., Far D. F., Auberger P., Rossi B., Ponzio G. Evidence for a p23 caspase-cleaved form of p27[KIP1] involved in G1 growth arrest. Oncogene. 1999;18:3324–3333. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1202668. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Levkau B., Koyama H., Raines E. W., Clurman B. E., Herren B., Orth K., Roberts J. M., Ross R. Cleavage of p21Cip1/Waf1 and p27Kip1 mediates apoptosis in endothelial cells through activation of Cdk2: role of a caspase cascade. Mol. Cell. 1998;1:553–563. doi: 10.1016/s1097-2765(00)80055-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Tomoda K., Kubota Y., Kato J. Degradation of the cyclin-dependent-kinase inhibitor p27Kip1 is instigated by Jab1. Nature. 1999;398:160–165. doi: 10.1038/18230. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Boehm M., Yoshimoto T., Crook M. F., Nallamshetty S., True A., Nabel G. J., Nabel E. G. A growth factor-dependent nuclear kinase phosphorylates p27 (Kip1) and regulates cell cycle progression. EMBO J. 2002;21:3390–3401. doi: 10.1093/emboj/cdf343. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Li N., Wang C., Wu Y., Liu X., Cao X. Ca(2+)/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II promotes cell cycle progression by directly activating MEK1 and subsequently modulating p27 phosphorylation. J. Biol. Chem. 2009;284:3021–3027. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M805483200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Fischer C., Sanchez-Ruderisch H., Welzel M., Wiedenmann B., Sakai T., Andre S., Gabius H. J., Khachigian L., Detjen K. M., Rosewicz S. Galectin-1 interacts with the {alpha}5{beta}1 fibronectin receptor to restrict carcinoma cell growth via induction of p21 and p27. J. Biol. Chem. 2005;280:37266–37277. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M411580200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Frost V., Al-Mehairi S., Sinclair A. J. Exploitation of a non-apoptotic caspase to regulate the abundance of the CDKI p27(KIP1) in transformed lymphoid cells. Oncogene. 2001;20:2737–2748. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1204367. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Chondrogianni N., Tzavelas C., Pemberton A. J., Nezis I. P., Rivett A. J., Gonos E. S. Overexpression of proteasome beta5 assembled subunit increases the amount of proteasome and confers ameliorated response to oxidative stress and higher survival rates. J. Biol. Chem. 2005;280:11840–11850. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M413007200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Chondrogianni N., Stratford F. L., Trougakos I. P., Friguet B., Rivett A. J., Gonos E. S. Central role of the proteasome in senescence and survival of human fibroblasts: induction of a senescence-like phenotype upon its inhibition and resistance to stress upon its activation. J. Biol. Chem. 2003;278:28026–28037. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M301048200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Gaczynska M., Goldberg A. L., Tanaka K., Hendil K. B., Rock K. L. Proteasome subunits X and Y alter peptidase activities in opposite ways to the interferon-gamma-induced subunits LMP2 and LMP7. J. Biol. Chem. 1996;271:17275–17280. doi: 10.1074/jbc.271.29.17275. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Oerlemans R., Franke N. E., Assaraf Y. G., Cloos J., van Zantwijk I., Berkers C. R., Scheffer G. L., Debipersad K., Vojtekova K., Lemos C., et al. Molecular basis of bortezomib resistance: proteasome subunit beta5 (PSMB5) gene mutation and overexpression of PSMB5 protein. Blood. 2008;112:2489–2499. doi: 10.1182/blood-2007-08-104950. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Ventadour S., Jarzaguet M., Wing S. S., Chambon C., Combaret L., Bechet D., Attaix D., Taillandier D. A new method of purification of proteasome substrates reveals polyubiquitination of 20 S proteasome subunits. J. Biol. Chem. 2007;282:5302–5309. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M610005200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]