Abstract
Access to the right to the highest attainable level of health is a constitutional right that obliges governments and other players to take step to increase all individuals’ chances of obtaining good health. At the least, health and education are two crucial requirements for this as well. Iran’s vision 2025 is going to lead the country to a developed state with the highest rank of economic, scientific and technological status in the region. Enjoying health, welfare, food security, social security, equal opportunities, etc, are also considered as part of characteristics of Iranian society in 2025. Although health system of Iran has many achievements in providing health services specially for the poor following the Islamic Revolution of 1979, but the evidences gathered to develop the 5th 5-years economical, social and cultural plan (5th5YDP:2011–2015), listed a variety of main challenges in stewardship, financing, resources generation and service provision functions of the existing health system. Thus, to overcome the main challenges, about 11% of general policies of 5th5YDP are directly address health related issues with emphasizing on healthy human and comprehensive health approach with considering: Integration of policy making, planning, evaluation, supervision and public financing; Developing both quantity and quality of health insurance system and reducing out-of-pocket expenditures for health services to 30% by the end of the 5th plan. The strategies of 5th5YDP adopted by the parliament as an Act will change the health system fundamentally through tuning the main drivers; so, its implementation needs brave leaders, capable managers, motivated technical staff and social mobilization.
Keywords: Health, Policy, Plan, Iran
Introduction
The right to the highest attainable level of health is a constitutional right, enshrined in the charter of WHO. This right obliges governments and other players to take step to increase all individuals’ chances of obtaining good health (1). Many factors has been defined as determinants of good or ill health including, individual biology and life styles, social and physical environment, access to qualitative health care and policies and related actions (2). Achieving the highest attainable level of health equitably for the population is the main intrinsic goal of every health system. A health system includes the resources, actors, and institutions related to the financing, regulation, and provision of health actions. A health action is defined to be any set of activities whose primary intent is to improve or maintain health (3).
Health and health systems may increase or decrease economic production. For example, some methods of organizing health financing, such as some forms of employment-based insurance, may hinder labor mobility and macro-economic performance. At the same time, there is increasing evidence that improvements in health can enhance economic growth (4). In fact, health is a cross-systems goal of all developmental sector activities in a society and could be defined as an indicator of good governance. It is well recognized that an increase in national income, by itself, does not capture development in its fullest sense. At least, health and education are two crucial requirements for this as well (5).
Securing equity and justice, political, economical, social and cultural independence and national solidarity is the main goals of the Iran in article 2 of its 1979 constitution. Article 3 of the constitution states that in order to attain these goals the government has the duty of directing all its resources to16 affairs including the foundation of a correct and equitable economic system in accordance with Islamic criteria in order to create welfare, eliminate poverty and abolish all forms of deprivation with respect to nutrition, housing, work, health and insurance coverage. Providing basic needs for all citizens including: housing, food, clothing, health and treatment, education and the requirements for the establishment of a family is one of the main bases of the economic system as well (article 43). Also, to benefit from social security with respect to retirement, unemployment, old age, disability, accidents, need to health and treatment services and medical care provided through insurance and etc is a universal right; The government, in accordance with the law, must secure the foregoing services and financial support for every individual citizen by drawing on the national revenues and funds obtained through public contributions (article 29) (6).
Development planning and management in I.R. of Iran
Country’s development is managed through 5-years economical, social and cultural plans, that is a strategic and operational plan developed at national level and after preparation of national documents including sectoral and intersectoral background materials, the provincial and organizational versions should be prepared afterwards. The Deputy President for Strategic Planning and Control (DPSPC) is responsible for coordinating the process of planning at national and provincial level. Based on a planning structure and instruction, special and joint taskforces are formed from representatives of different organization to conduct studies to prepare required reports; for instance, Ministry of Health and Medical Education (MOHME) is responsible for health special taskforce to draft the health plan by cooperation of related governmental and non governmental bodies. The High Council of Planning is responsible for integration of all received reports.
First, the government prepares the general policies of the plan; then the general policies should be reviewed and finalized by the Supreme Leader of Iran after consultation with country’s Expediency Council; after that, the approved policies send to the president to be implemented in planning process. Each taskforce makes drafted report based on the related general policies which includes internal and external situational analysis, general policies and goals, strategies, executive policies, programs, objectives and activities. The final 5-year development plan which will be sent by the government to the Islamic Parliament, Majlis, includes goals, strategies, resources and proposed legislative articles required for implementation. After reviewing the plan in the related special commission of the Majlis, it will be presented, article by article, in the public scene for final discussion, possible amendments and voting. After approval of Guardian Council, that is responsible to assess alignment of parliament adopted laws with Iran’s constitution and Islamic rules, the Act of development plan will be notified to the government for enforcement and implementation (7).
Five development plans have been prepared after the Islamic Revolution of 1979; among them, the 4th and 5th plans are targeting Iran Vision 2025. The vision is going to lead the country to a developed state with the highest rank of economic, scientific and technological status in the region, maintaining revolutionary and Islamic identity, inspiring Islamic world, as well as effective and constructive interactions in its international relations. Enjoying health, welfare, food security, social security, equal opportunities, fair income distribution, strong family structure; to be away from poverty, corruption, and discrimination; and benefitting desirable living environment are also considered out of characteristics of Iranian society in that year (8).
Achievements and challenges of Iranian Health System
Late in 1970s, investments in public health led to provision of clean water, better hygiene and sanitation. This was accompanied by development of a basic but strong rural Primary Health Care (PHC) system. Coverage with social medical insurance is over 90 percent of the population. The country has developed an expanded network - public and private - of sophisticated outpatient specialty services, as well as a network of secondary and tertiary services through its hospital network (9). Collectively, these changes contributed to improving mean life expectancy at birth to 70.9 years old for male and 73.17 years old for female by 2007. Likewise, there have been remarkable drops in total fertility rate and infant, under five and maternal mortality rates (2).
Iran is currently experiencing a “youth bulge”; however, projections predict that Iran’s demographic profiles will be aging, in the coming two decades. In twenty years, these relative reductions in younger populations and substantially increased numbers of elderly will impact on labor and social policies and can further be expected to change the epidemiologic profile and the burden of disease in the country.
Now, Iran faces a burden of disease increasingly predominated by non-communicable diseases and accidents. The burden of disease profile is characterized by risky behaviors of youth such as traffic accidents and injuries. Over the next two decades, when these young population move into working age and older age cohorts, there would be a dominance of chronic conditions including cardiovascular diseases, cancers, and mental illness. The Health Policy Council (HPC) of MOHME of I.R of Iran has to act as a consultant, and help developing evidence based policy making (10); the evidences and experts opinions analyzed by the committees of HPC to prepare the 5th health development plan displayed main challenges in all Iranian health system functions, although the country has many achievements in providing health services specially for the low-income population (Table 1) (2).
Table 1:
Stewardship |
---|
Disintegration of health governance bodies |
Conflict of interest in some of policy makers and managers |
Weakness in hiring skilled human resources for policy making, planning and effective monitoring |
Lake of agreed instruction for health policy making and planning process and procedures. |
Weakness of financial resources for policy making and planning |
Weakness of attention of policy makers to periodical monitoring of policy and plan implementation |
Weakness of stakeholder contribution in policy making and planning |
Weakness of project management skills in national and provincial experts |
Undirected applied researches for responding to health priorities |
Service Provision |
Development of various and uncoordinated health care delivery systems by different organizations that their mission are not promoting health and are funded in different ways (such as Municipalities, Banks, Judiciary system, Ministry of Oil, Broadcasting, ...). |
Different health services packages of various funders that sometimes are not defined based on priorities. |
Different ways of financing which has a direct effect on service delivery methods. |
Effects of different cultural backgrounds on the utilization of health services |
The public demand and some of planners’ and policy makers’ interests on developing specialized and complex services instead of expanding and strengthening the primary prevention services approach. |
Lack of effective control on health service delivery in different sectors. |
Financing |
Lack of enough total and public financial resources(regressive trend in public resources) |
Unfair health financing : Fair Financial Contribution Index =0.832 (2007) |
Unfair payments for health services by population: Out Of Pocket = %51.7, Catastrophic Health Expenditure = %2.5.(2007) |
Lack of a profound vision in medical insurances |
Untargeted health sector resources towards low income deciles(Geographical targeting, targeting supply side, weakness of informal sector groups finding) |
Unsustainability of resources and in coordination between resources and required service packages and quality of care and costs |
Incoherency in revenue collection and risk pooling (different methods of premiums, several public, semi public and private insurance funds) |
Lack of cohesion in stewardship of financing system |
Inequitable and cost producing Payment system, mostly fee-for- service. (equal payment to services with different quality, different prices for a similar service, not to obey the public and private tariffs) |
Excessive capacity building inappropriate to the health needs (educating extra human resources, irregular import of medical equipments) |
Resource Generation (Human, Physical, Information, drugs and other health products) |
Lack of national policies, strategies and plans of Human Resources of Health(HRH) appropriated to the Iran vision 2025 |
Lack of need assessment information and incorporating existing evidences in HRH planning. |
Surplus of manpower in various fields and unemployment and immigration of some of graduates. |
Lack of internal and external coordination with human resources production and management bodies. |
Lack of a monitoring system for periodical situational analysis of HRH. |
Inadequate knowledge and skills of human capital resources management. |
Inappropriateness between quality and quantity of medical education and employment market needs. |
Lack of effective presence of faculties in medical universities and public hospitals. |
Low job satisfaction and weakness of incentive system in improving performances. |
Low salary and unbalanced income of similar level groups and inequitable payment to different levels. |
Reduction of real value of salaries due to price inflation. |
weakness of technical knowledge and technology for producing diagnostic medical devices and equipments. |
weakness of defined and updated standards of medical equipments. |
Export development and emerging medical technologies in countries. |
Effects of media in defining medical equipment market |
Lack of adequate physical facilities. |
Weakness of capacity of physical facilities management. |
Unprofessional and sometimes nonstandard building construction. |
Uncoordinated building construction by health donors. |
weakness of legislation about E-health in the country |
Lack of a coherent national strategy on development of E-health |
Conflict and contention between various governmental agencies regarding stewardship of E-health plans and programs |
weakness of technical, information, security and technological infrastructure in the field of electronic health |
Lack of accurate and oriented investment for support of E-Health policies and programs |
Being a governmental (under government) field, that hampers investment of the private sector. |
Remoteness of some of information generating areas (eg rural health houses) and lack of required infrastructure in these sections |
Lack of human resources, skills and abilities that is necessary for E-health development. |
Weakness of drug policies due to lack of national health policies. |
Drug Act is not updated to the current situation. |
Hospital drugs budget are included in hospital total budget and there is no integrated system for monitoring the performances. |
Prescribing the out of national list drugs by some of famous medical specialists increases the health expenditures and out of pocket rate. |
Irrational prescribing of antibiotics, corticosteroids and injections by some of doctors. |
Weakness of effective contribution of pharmacists in treatment cycle of the patients in hospital and ambulatory settings. |
Privatizing drug industries has not led to real independent private drug companies. Some of drug holdings are drug purchasers. |
Weakness of drug pricing mechanism. |
Some drugs in the market are illicit. |
Weakness of drug laboratories in quality control. |
Health policies and strategies in the 5th 5YDP
As the health system of I.R. of Iran should rapidly respond to the current and immediate health needs of young generation of the country, and at the same time, to prepare itself for the current epidemiological transition of diseases to non communicable diseases (NCDs), a vision were prepared as follows by the MOHME based on the Iran’s Vision 2025 as the basic step of 5th 5-years development planning:
“At 2025, I.R. of Iran is a country with people having highest rank of health situation and the most equitable and developed health system in the region”
(2).
For approaching the vision, goals were estimated by analyzing the trend of the main indices and comparing them with benchmarked countries. Also, general policies of health in the 5th5YDP proposed to the government by MOHME. Finally, the following general policies approved by the supreme leader to overcome the main challenges of health system in 5th5YDP (11).
Science and Technology affairs
7) Reform in higher education and research system . . .
8) . . . Increase physical and mental health of students
Social affairs
19) Emphasizing in healthy human and comprehensive health approach with considering :
19-1) Integration in policy making, planning, evaluation, supervision and public funds allocation.
19-2) Improving indices of healthy air, food security, environmental, physical and mental health
19-3) Reducing health risk factors
19-4) Modification of community nutrition style with improving composition and health of foods.
19-5) Developing quantity and quality of health insurances and reducing people sharing of health expenditures to 30% up to end of 5th plan.
Economical affairs
25-4) Creating competitive market for provision of medical insurance services.
31) Improving and coordinating among developmental objectives: education, health and employment, as, the Human Development Index (HDI) reaches to the level of countries with high HDI at the end of 5th5YDP.
35-5) Securing universal and efficient insurance and developing the quantity and quality of social security system and medical insurance services.
Based on above leading general policies, the 5th 5-years health development plan (5th5YHDP) including vision, strategic goals, strategies and actions and legislative articles were drafted by health special taskforce in MOHME and defended in the DPSPC. Finally the 5th5YDP were reviewed and completed by the Majlis and after approval of the expediency council, notified to the president on Feb 2011.
Adapting 5th5YDP Act’s articles to the Health System Conceptual Framework of World Health Organization report 2000 (Table 2) showed that this is a big reform plan that is going to strengthen all functions of the system coordinately to address the current and future health problems, specially the NCDs treats (12).
Table 2:
Stewardship |
---|
|
Service Provision |
|
Financing |
|
Resource Generation (Human, Physical, Information, drugs and other health products) |
|
Conclusion
Appropriately configured and managed health systems provide a vehicle to improve people’s lives, protecting them from the vulnerability of sickness, generating a sense of security, and building social cohesion within society; they can ensure that all groups benefit from socioeconomic development and they can generate the political support needed to sustain them (1).
The general policies and strategies of 5th5YHDP Act have been prepared for overcoming the current and future health challenges by tuning the main drivers of improving the system. As this plan will change the health system fundamentally to secure healthy people and comprehensive health approach, its implementation needs brave leaders, capable managers, motivated technical staff and social mobilization.
Ethical considerations
Ethical issues (Including plagiarism, Informed Consent, misconduct, data fabrication and/or falsification, double publication and/or submission, redundancy, etc) have been completely observed by the authors.
Acknowledgments
The paper is prepared based on the documents has been produced for the 5th 5-years health development plan. We would like to thank all of national and provincial health sector managers and technical officers whom enrolled in preparing and defending the plan for their invaluable collaborations. The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.
References
- 1.Marmot M. Achieving health equity: from root causes to fair outcomes. Lancet. 2007:370. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61385-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Health Policy Council. I.R. of Iran Health in 5th economical, social and cultural development plan. 2009. Health Policy Council, Ministry of Health and Medical Education, Iran. Available from: http://siasat.behdasht.gov.ir/index.aspx?siteid=291&pageid=31686.
- 3.World Health Organization 2000. The world Health Report 2000: Health system Performance. Geneva: Available from: www.who.int/whr/2000/en/ [Google Scholar]
- 4.Murray C, Frenk J. A WHO Framework for Health System Performance Assessment. Bulletin of the World Health Organization. 2000;2000;78(6):717–731. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.UNDP. Human Development Report 2005, International cooperation at crossroads: Aid, trade and security in an unequal world. 2005. United Nations Development Programme. Available from: http://hdr.undp.org/en/reports/global/hdr2005/
- 6.Research Center for Islamic Consultancy Parliament . Constitution of Islamic Republic of Iran 1979. Available from: http://rc.majlis.ir/fa/content/iran_constitution
- 7.Vosoogh A, Damari B, Salarianzadeh H, Rostami N. Designing a framework for provincial 5th health development plan. Health policy council of ministry of health and medical education; Iran: 2011. [Google Scholar]
- 8.Vision statement of I.R. of Iran at 2025. Available from: http://www.vision1404.ir/fa/News48.aspx
- 9.World Bank. Islamic Republic of Iran, Health Sector Review: Main Report. 2007. Available from: www.mums.ac.ir/shares/education/assadir1/modiriyat3.pdf. [Google Scholar]
- 10.Larijani B, Delavari A, Damari B, Vosoogh Moghadam A, Majdzadeh R. Health Policy Making System in Islamic Republic of Iran: Review an Experience. Iranian J Publ Health. 2009;38(Suppl. 1):1–3. [Google Scholar]
- 11.General Policies of 5th5 year development plan. Available from: http://english.khamenei.ir//index.php
- 12.Research Center for Islamic Consultancy Parliament. I.R. of Iran 5th 5-years economical, social and cultural development plan Act. Available from: http://rc.majlis.ir/fa/law/show/790196