Skip to main content
PMC home page
PLOS ONE logoLink to PLOS ONE
. 2013 Jul 16;8(7):e68627. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0068627

Sox2 Transcriptionally Regulates Pqbp1, an Intellectual Disability-Microcephaly Causative Gene, in Neural Stem Progenitor Cells

Chan Li 1, Hikaru Ito 1, Kyota Fujita 1, Hiroki Shiwaku 1, Yunlong Qi 1, Kazuhiko Tagawa 1, Takuya Tamura 1, Hitoshi Okazawa 1,2,*
Editor: Debra L Silver3
PMCID: PMC3713010  PMID: 23874697

Abstract

PQBP1 is a nuclear-cytoplasmic shuttling protein that is engaged in RNA metabolism and transcription. In mouse embryonic brain, our previous in situ hybridization study revealed that PQBP1 mRNA was dominantly expressed in the periventricular zone region where neural stem progenitor cells (NSPCs) are located. Because the expression patterns in NSPCs are related to the symptoms of intellectual disability and microcephaly in PQBP1 gene-mutated patients, we investigated the transcriptional regulation of PQBP1 by NSPC-specific transcription factors. We selected 132 genome sequences that matched the consensus sequence for the binding of Sox2 and POU transcription factors upstream and downstream of the mouse PQBP1 gene. We then screened the binding affinity of these sequences to Sox2-Pax6 or Sox2-Brn2 with gel mobility shift assays and found 18 genome sequences that interacted with the NSPC-specific transcription factors. Some of these sequences had cis-regulatory activities in Luciferase assays and in utero electroporation into NSPCs. Furthermore we found decreased levels of expression of PQBP1 protein in NSPCs of heterozygous Sox2-knockout mice in vivo by immunohistochemistry and western blot analysis. Collectively, these results indicated that Sox2 regulated the transcription of PQBP1 in NSPCs.

Introduction

PQBP1 is a novel protein identified by yeast two-hybrid screening that binds to the polyglutamine (polyQ) tract sequence [1], [2]. PolyQ sequence is shared by multiple transcription-related factors, such as TFIID/TATA-binding protein, androgen receptor, glucocorticoid receptor, octamer-binding factors, and CREB-binding factors, and by proteins related to a group of triplet-repeat diseases, which are called polyQ diseases, such asataxin-1, ataxin-2, atrophin-1/DRPLA protein, and huntingtin. These proteins belonging to the two groups were easily determined by putting the polyQ sequence into a BLAST search (http://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi?PAGE=Proteins).The binding characteristics of PQBP1 suggests involvement of PQBP1 in the common pathology of multiple polyQ diseases [3], [4].Although PQBP1 is a small protein of 265 amino acids, it possesses two protein-interaction motifs, the WW domain (WWD) and the C-terminal domain (CTD). PQBP1 interacts with RNA polymerase II (Pol II) or WBP11/NpwBP/SIPP through WWD [4]–[6] and with a U5 spliceosome factor U 5–15 kD through CTD [7], [8].

PQBP1 is a nuclear-dominant nuclear-cytoplasmic shuttling protein that is engaged in RNA metabolism and transcription. PQBP1 functionally connects transcription and splicing when it is located in the nucleus [1], [4], [7]–[10], but, in abnormal conditions, it shifts to the stress granule in the cytoplasm and probably regulates RNA metabolism [11]. Although the dynamics and functional roles seem to be essential for all types of cells, previous analyses have indicated an unequal distribution of PQBP1 mRNA and protein in different tissues and different cell types [1], [12]. In embryonic mouse brain, our previous in situ hybridization study revealed that PQBP1mRNA is dominantly expressed in the periventricular zone region where neural stem progenitor cells (NSPCs)are located [12].

PQBP1 has been implicated in both neurodegenerative diseases and developmental disorders.PQBP1 has been shown to interact with the two polyQ disease proteins, ataxin-1 and huntingtin [3], [4]. A European Consortium Study has revealed that mutations of thePQBP1 gene are linked to intellectual disabilities (ID) that are characterized by mental retardation, microcephaly, and short stature [13]–[17]. Because the expression pattern in NSPCs is critical for an understanding of ID and microcephaly inPQBP1 gene-mutated patients and of stem cell-related pathology in neurodegeneration, we investigated the transcriptional regulation of PQBP1 by NSPC-specific transcription factors in this study.

Especially, we focused on the role of Sox2 in the transcriptional regulation of PQBP1 in NSPCs. Sox2 is one of the most critical transcription factors for NSPCs. The stemness or pluripotency of NSPCs is mainly attributed to Sox2, which is clearly demonstrated in studies of induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells [18]. The difference between totipotent embryonic stem (ES)/iPS cells and NSPC depends on the expression of Oct-3/4, which is expressed in ES/embryonic carcinoma (EC)/iPS cells [18]–[22], but it is rapidly downregulated during their differentiation by retinoic acid-repressive enhancer [19]. Actually, iPS cells were generated from NSPCs only with Oct-3/4 [23]. Sox2 forms a heterodimer with the POU transcription factors, including Oct-3/4 [24]–[26]. In this regard, the change in the Sox2 partner from Oct-3/4 to the NSPC-specific POU factor Brn2 or to another NSPC-specific transcription factor, such as Pax6, may switch on the expression of PQBP1 in NSPCs.

Sox2, which is a HMG-box-containing transcription factor that binds to the minor groove of DNA, forms a heterodimer with a POU transcription factor [27]. POU transcription factors are a group of AT-rich major groove-binding transcription factors, and they include Pit1, Oct-1, Oct-2, and Unc-86. In addition, the group includes Oct-3/4, which is a key transcription factor for ES cell differentiation [28] and iPS cell generation [18], and the other transcription factors.

Pax6 is expressed in apical and basal progenitor cells. Brn2 is highly expressed in NSPCs. Therefore, they could be the partner of Sox2 [27], [29]. Although Oct-3/4 has been shown to be expressed at high levels in stem cells ranging from ES cells to epiblasts in the neural lineage [19]–[22], it is downregulated to an extremely low level in NSPCs [30]. Furthermore, a conditional knockout of Oct-3/4 induced by nestin-Cre did not show morphological changes in the brain [31], and this was distinct from PQBP1-conditional knockout mice (our unpublished results). Thus, Oct-3/4 could be excluded as the candidate. Oct-6 might be a third candidate that is expressed in the glial cell lineage from NSPCs [32], [33] whereas the expression of PQBP1 is low in glial cells [1].

Hence, we employed the first 2 types of heterodimers (Pax6-Sox2, Brn2-Sox2), and screened for the genome sequence surrounding the PQBP1 gene that were homologous to the Sox2-Pax6 or Sox2-Brn2-binding consensus sequence for their binding activity and transcriptional activity. Consequently we identified 18 genome sequences that interacted with the NSPC-specific transcription factors. In utero electroporation into NSPCs revealed that some of them had cis-regulatory activities in vivo. Furthermore, we found decreased expression of PQBP1 protein in NSPCs of heterozygous Sox2-knockout mice. All these results in this study supported that Sox2 regulates the transcription of PQBP1 in NSPCs.

Results

PQBP1 Protein is Highly Expressed in NSPCs

We have previously shown with in situ hybridization that mouse PQBP1 mRNA is expressed in mature neurons, but not in glia, in adult brains [1] and that PQBP1 is dominantly expressed in the periventricular zone in embryonic brain [12]. The levels of expression were clearly higher in embryonic brain than in adult brain [12]. At the beginning of this study, we reexamined the previous findings at the protein level by immunohistochemisty. In E15 embryonic brain, PQBP1was highly expressed in NSPCs, but it was also weakly expressed in differentiating neurons (Figure 1). This finding reconfirmed the high levels of expression of PQBP1 in NSPCs that we found in our previous results.

Figure 1. PQBP1 is expressed in the ventricular zone.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

PQBP1 is expressed in the VZ of mouse embryonic brains at E15, which is the critical period for neuronal proliferation. Sagittal plane sections of the cerebral cortex were double-stained for PQBP1 and the following markers: Sox-2, for neural stem cells; RC2, specific for radial glia; Tuj-1, specific for differentiating immature neurons, and MAP2, to stain mature neurons. V, lateral ventricle; VZ, ventricular zone; S, cortical surface; IZ, intermediate zone; CP, cortical plate. Scale bar, 100 µm. The lower right panel shows the position of the magnified fields in the whole brain. Confocal microscopy (LSM510META, Carl Zeiss AG) with 10X lens was used to visualize the fluorescence.

Although the PQBP1 protein has been shown to shuttle between the nucleus and the cytoplasm [1] and to move to a specific cytoplasmic domain when cells form stress granules under stressful conditions [11], PQBP1 concentrates in the nucleus due to its nuclear localization signal sequence in normal conditions [1]. An immunohistochemical analysis with confocal microscopy again demonstrated the in vivo expression of PQBP1 in periventricular NSPCs of E15 mouse embryo (Figure 2A).Moreover, PQBP1 was clearly colocalized with Sox2, which is a nuclear marker of NSPCs (Figure 2A). Immunohistochemistry with an anti-PQBP1 antibody showed PQBP1 protein expression in embryonic brain (Figure 1), and this protein expression was downregulated during the differentiation of NSPCs in a western blot analysis that was performed with primary NSPCs before and after differentiation by culture on polyethyleneimine and poly-L-lysine (Figure 2B).

Figure 2. PQBP1 is expressed in neural stem progenitor cells (NSPC).

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

(A) Confocal microscopic analysis of VZ at E15 confirmed the colocalization of PQBP1 and Sox2 in the nuclei of NSPCs. Confocal microscopy (LSM510META, Carl Zeiss AG) with 40X water emersion lens was used to visualize the fluorescence. (B) NSPCs from E15 mouse were differentiated by plating them on dishes coated with polyethyleneimine or poly-L-lysine. The upper panels show the chronological expression of the differentiation markers. The lower panels show the downregulation of PQBP1 protein levels by the differentiation of NSPCs. The positive control is Drosophila Schneider cells that express PQBP1 and that do not show a band that is reactive to anti mammal beta-actin antibody. Digital images were captured by an Olympus IX71 microscope.

The PQBP1 Gene is Surrounded by Multiple Sox2-Binding Sites

As introduced, we employed the Pax6-Sox2 and Brn2-Sox2 heterodimers and screened for the genome sequence surrounding the PQBP1 gene. In the 57424000 to the 37524000 chromosomal region surrounding the PQBP1 gene, we found 132 sequences that were homologous to the Sox2-Pax6 or Sox2-Brn2-binding consensus sequence (Figure 3 and Table 1). The criteria of consensus sequences are listed in Table 2. In addition, we found many binding consensus sequences for Sox2-Oct6, which will be discussed later.

Figure 3. Possible cis-elements upstream and downstream of the PQBP1 gene.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

(A) Possible cis-elements were selected by their similarity to the consensus binding sequence of Sox2-Brn2 or Sox2-Pax6. The positions on the genome of the first nucleotide in candidate cis-element sequences are shown. The distance from the 5′-end nucleotide of the PQBP1 gene or from the 3′-end nucleotide of the PQBP1 gene are shown as – or +, respectively. (B) The schematic shows the sites of the candidate cis-elements in the genomic region surrounding the PQBP1 gene.

Table 1. Probes for gel mobility shift assay.

number position sequence number2 position2 sequence2
1 −47181 AAAATAACCAaaatAAAAAGTGTACAATTCAGTGGC 64 −5906 ATATATGCACAAACACTCatttACATAAAATAA
2 −47150 GCCATAGAATTGTACTTCTGTCACCAGTTTTATTTTTTTATTT 65 −5556 GTACTTGGTGAtaatTTCATTGTCCACATGC
3 −46738 ACCTATACTTTGTTTTtattGCCTAGTAAT 66 −4615 GGAACTCCCTTaaatTTGGTTTGTTTATGTGT
4A −45255 GACTTAATTGTGAGTCTCTGTAAAATTAACAAACAAGTTAC 67 −4274 GCATATGCATTGTCTGTGtattCTAAATGTAT
4B −45255 AGTCTCTGTAaaatTAACAAACAAGTTAC 68 −3145 TTTGTTTGTTTGTTTAAAGGatttATTTATTTAT
4C −45255 TAAAATTAACAAACAAGTTACattaTCTAATATACA 69 −2866 ACAAGTGATTTGTCCTTATCACATAGCTAGGAAAAGGGAAT
5 −44036 TGTAGGTCATTGTGGCCTCAAatttGGTAATGTAA 70 −989 GAGATTTGTTTGTGCTATCattaGATCAATGAT
6 −43472 AGGACTTAATTGTTCGCatttCTGTATTCTG 71 −584 GAGATTTGTTTGTGCTATCattaGATCAATGAT
7 −43333 CAACCACCTCTaaatGCCTACAAATTGTATGGTCAT 72 −537 GTTTGTTTTTTAAGGAACTGtaatGAACAAATGTCAGGA
8 −43242 GCTGTAACAGaataCCTGACAAAAGCAACTT 73 exon5 CTTGTCCTCAGCATCTATGGTAACACACAAATCCTGAAG
9 −41447 TCCTGCCACTTGGGTTGCAGTGAGGACAATGAAATGAG 74 exon4 GACTTTCTTGGCGGATTTGGTAACGACAAAGTTAGGAT
10 −40291 ACACACACACAAAGatttatttATTCATTTAAT 75 intron2 GCTCTGGGTAtaatTAACAATAAAATGCA
11 −39839 GTGGGGTACAAaaatGGCCCTTTGTGATCAACT 76 intron2 CAGGTATGATTGTCCAtattGCTAATAAAC
12 −39624 AGTATGAGTTTGTATATGTTGattaACCAAACACT 77 intron2 TATGTCTATTTGTTTTTtattTTTTGAAGACT
13 −38358 TCTCCTGCTTTGTAGTCACAGAGTAGTCAAGAAGGGCT 78 +649 TCTTTTGATTTGTCCGatttAGGTTTTAAA
14 −37574 GTCAGGATTTTGTGTGTGGattaACTGTATCAT 79 +1004 TGATAGTAACAAAAACCatttTGTTTTTGGCT
15 −37310 AGATCTTTACAAATTTCTATattaGAGTTTTTTGT 80 +1314 CATCCCAAATTGTTTTCTCACTTTTGTACCACAGATAGAT
16A −37221 GTGAACCCTTTCAGATTTAGTGACGTAGCTTCACAAAGTGATTAA 81 +1496 AGAGTGCTGGtattAAAAGGCACAAACTTTCTTT
16B −37221 GTAGCTTCACAAAGTGattaACACATGGATA 82 +3474 ACTATTTATTTGTGTTTTCCtattCACTTTACAT
17 −36441 TTTAAAGATTTGTTTCTTtattATATGTAAGTA 83 +3836 GTCCAAGTTTTGTGACCCTTTaataCAGTTAGATC
18 −36047 CTTAGAATTAGtaatTTCTTGATATTGTCTGTTAAG 84 +3965 TATGAATCACAATGTAaataTCTGTGTTTA
19 −35915 GAAGGAAAATTGTTCCCTGACatttTTGAACTGGG 85 +5137 ACATATGCAATTGTTTCCTGtattATAGTAGAGAT
20 −35554 CTCAGAGCTAGaaatATTTGTGGAATGGG 86 +5270 AGTTTAGTTTGTAGAGTACTTACCTAGCAGCACAAAGCCCTG
21 −33240 CAGAATCATTTGTGTTTTCCCatttTTGCCAGGGG 87 +5773 TTATGACTGTTtaataatATATATTGTGTTCTGGC
22 −32170 TACATACAGCAaaataatCTTTGTAGGGGGGA 88 +7767 TGTTTTGTTTTGTTTTTTGtattGGGAAGTGGG
23 −32116 AATCTCTATCTTACTTCTTGTAAGTGTGGACAAATGCAGGTT 89 +8049 CTACCACACCCAACCTCTAGTAAAGGTTTACAAAATGAATGA
24 −31798 CTTGTATCTTTGTATGTTCACAGAAAGCAAAGTAGCGTGG 90 +8719 TGCTGTTTTTTGTTACTGTCACTAATTACATTTTAAATTAT
25 −31280 CAGATAACTTTGTCCTTTTTGatttTGAGTGAAGA 91 +9294 TTTGTTTGTTTGTTTTTAAAaataAGGTCTCGGG
26 −28404 GTGGAGGCTTTGTGTAATCAGTCTGTGTA 92 +9492 ATATAATAATaaatCTTTAAAACAAAAAAAAAAA
27 −28297 CACACCTGTTTGTTTTCCACTTCACAGAGGAGGCATAGGAAACT 93 +10615 ATAGAGGCACAAAAatttCCAGAGACTGG
28 −27826 AAAAAAGATTCtaatCTTTTTTGTGGTGGTGG 94 +11103 ATCTGTAAAGGaaatTACTTTGTAGGAaattTGATGGAACTG
29 −27562 AAAAACTTTTTGTTATTTCatttTTATTAGTGG 95 +11315 GGTTTTCTTTTGTACACTTaataTCCGCTGGGG
30 −27087 TGTCTTCTCCCtaatGATTGTTGTATGAC 96 +11695 ACATAGACACaaatAGCAGACAATGACCTTGA
31 −27021 TCCTCTCCTTTGTTTTGTCCTCACACCCCCAGCTGACCAGGTG 97 +13651 TAGATGCTACAAAAGATACTGattaAAACCCAAATG
32 −26881 CGTTGCACACAAACCTTAatttTCCAATCTATT 98 +13814 TTATGAATACAATTCattaTAACCATGGAT
33 −25612 ATAGTACATTTGTTGTCattaACAAATCAGT 99 +13985 ATATAACAAGAtaatCATTGTTTTGaataTTCCAAGGATTT
34 −25489 TTGTT CCCTTTGACTTCTTGTGACTTTAACAAATTCTAAAG 100 +14062 CAACCAAAAAaaatGtattTTACAAAAATCACAA
35 −25268 GTTTCTCTAATtaatAGACTTCATTGTTCAAAACTatttTACATTTGTT 101 +15036 TGCCTCCTTTTGTGAGCtattTATAATGCTAA
36 −24453 TGCATACATTTGTAATTCatttAGGTGGTTTT 102A +15227 GGATCCCCACaataCAAAAAAAACAAAAACAAAAC
37 −24113 TTTCATGGTTTGTTAGCtattCTCTTATCAC 102B +15227 AAAACAAAACAAAACTGGatttGGCGATTGTAT
38 −24002 AGGTTTTGATGattaTGAACAAAGCTTCTGT 102C +15227 ATTTGGCGATTGTATTATaattGTCTATCAGT
39 −23970 TTCAGGTTTTTGTAGGAACTTAaattTTATGATTAG 104 +16271 CACAATTTTTAtaatATATAATTGTTTCATCAA
40 −23588 TTTGTCATTTTGTAGTGCTAGGaattAAACCCATGT 105 +16356 ATTTTTTAAAAaattAGACTACCACAAATCAACTGT
41 −23280 TTTGGAAAACAAAACattaACCAAAATTTT 106 +16665 GCTTCCCTAGaattGGAGATACAAAGGGCTCTG
42 −22875 GCTTCAGCATTGTGAaattGAATCATTGC 107 +16934 ACTAGTTTTCtattACTACAAATCTCAACT
43 −22646 AGGAGTGCTTTGTAAAaataACTTCTATGT 108 +17613 CATCTTATCGTtaatATATACGTTTGTTACATATA
44 −21313 AAACCATGGGGGGTGGGCTGTAAACACAAAAAGGATTC 109 +17782 CTTTTTTTTTTGTATGTGatttGAGGCAGAGT
45 −19662 AAATGTGCTTtattTCACAAAATCAACAA 110 +19140 TTTATTTATTTGTTTtattTCtattTTTCTTGGTGA
46 −19653 TTATTTCACAaaatCAACAAATCAAAAAG 111 +19986 TTCAACCTTTTGTTGTATCatttAAAAAACATT
47 −19225 CCACCATCTGtaatGTCCTTGGCACAATAAAACCAA 112 +21326 TGTGTTCATTTGTTTTtattTTAGAAGGAGT
48 −18595 ATGAAATGGCTaaatCCTTTTTTTGTTGTTTGTT 113 +22153 ACTAAGTCATTGTTTatttCCGTGCTGTT
49 −18224 CTCTCTGATTTGTGAGtattGACAGAGAAT 114 +22326 TGATTTTTGCAaaatTTTGTTTTGTTTCTTGAG
50 −18091 TTTGTAAGTTTGTACCatttGGCCTCAGCC 115 +22784 CTGGCCAGACAATGACGATatttTTTTCCTTCAC
51 −17489 GTCCGGCTTTTGTTGatttGCTTATCTAT 116 +24844 AAGGCCAGACtaatCTACAAAGTGAGTTC
52 −17354 GGGGCAGCACAAATatttCTGTGAATGTA 117 +25042 GAAAAACAAAGatttAGTATAAA
53 −17305 TGCTTGTGACAAATCTGTCAatttCTGGTGGGGGC 118 +25259 GACAAGGGTCaattTGCTAGACAAAGATCTTCA
54 −15364 AGGTGTTAAGTGTGGAGTCGTGAGAACAACAATCCAGATAG 119 +27750 CCGATCGCTTTGTTCTACatttTATGTTCTAT
55 −15227 GTAGATTATTTGTCCACCATTCACAAGCACTGAGTTCAATAAC 120 +27794 TCCACACTCTAtaatCTCACATTGTTTGGCACC
56 −13834 ACACTTATACAATAATAGTatttATTAATAGTAT 121 +28016 GTGCTCAATTTGTGTTAGCta TTACTAGCAAGTCATTAACTCAC
57 −11697 CCTAAGATTCTtaatCTGACATTGTAGTCCCTA 122 +31108 GAAAAGGATTTGTACTTAaataAGCACCTGGC
58 −11280 TGAGATGGAGGaaatAAGTCTTATTGTTGTTCTCC 123 +34572 AGTGCTATTTTGTCGAGAaattGTAGAAGACA
59 −10829 AGCTTTTAACAATTTAatttTGTCTCTACCT 124 +36539 CTTATGCTTCtattCTACACAATTCCACAAC
60 −10819 AATTTAATTTTGTCTCTACCTTTCACGCTTCTCCTTTGCATTTTC 125 +40627 GGGATGCAATTGTCAGTCACCTTTCTTGAGCCTGTGGGA
61 −10748 TAAATTTTTCtaatCCTGACAAATCTCTTCA 126 +42316 AATGTTGTCAtaatTGAAAAAGACAAAGCACTAAT
62 −9300 TTTAAACAATTGTCCCATTCattaTATTGCAACA 127 +45211 TTTTGTTTTTTGTTTAAAGCaataACATATTCAG
63 −9205 AGAAATCCTCaattTCCTTATCCACAAAATGGACatttTCCTAGTACCT 128 +46440 AATATCAGTGTAATGattaACAGACAATGGCAGAGG
Open in a new tab

The sequences of oligonucleotide probes used for gel mobility assay are listed. Consensus sequences of transcriptional factors are indicated with bold letters. Each consensus sequences are presented in table 2. Sox2 (capital, italic), Brn2 (miniscule), Pax6 (capital), Oct6 (miniscule, italic). The number and position correspond to the information in Fig 3.

Table 2. Consensus sequence and spacing.

protein consensus binding motif heterodimer spacing(N)
Sox2 ATTGT, TTTGT, ACAAT, ACAAA
Brn2 aaat, taat, attt, atta Sox2/Brn2 1≤N≤11
Pax6 TCAC, TTAC, GTGA, GTAA Sox2/Pax6 2≤N≤9
0ct6 aata, aatt, attt, atta, tatt, aatt, aaat, taat, aata Sox2/Oct6 2≤N≤10
Open in a new tab

The consensus sequence and spacing are listed for each transcriptional factor. “Capital”, “miniscule”, “italic” corresponded to the information in Table 1.

From these sequences, we synthesized oligonucleotide probes and performed gel mobility shift assays. First, we checked the soundness of our method with positive controls of the cis-element (Figure 4) and with GST-only proteins (Supplementary Figure 1). We next screened the 132 probes with GST-fusion proteins of the Brn2 or Pax6 DNA-binding domain and found68positive probes (Figure 4 and Supplementary Figure 2B). The determination of positive probes was based on the radioactivity of the expected position of the band and on their statistical differences compared to the negative controls (Figure 4). These were termed first-positive probes. Similarly, with the gel shift assay, we screened the candidate probes by the heterodimers of the full-length Sox2-Brn2 or Sox2-Pax6 proteins (Figure 5 and Supplementary Figure 2A). The second screening selected 28 second-positive probes (Figure 5). Through the comparison of first-positive and second-positive probes (Table 3), we selected double-positive probes, the binding of which to the Sox2 heterodimer was considered reliable. Consequently, we selected 18 probes (Table 4). Double-positive probes for Sox2-Pax6 were also positive for Sox2-Brn2, while double positive probes for Sox2-Brn2 were not always positive for Sox2-Pax6 (Table 3). Since both Brn2 and Pax6 prefer AT-rich sequences and Sox2 consensus sequences in minor groves are not extremely specific, such overlapped binding of the two heterodimers might have occurred.

Figure 4. Screening of cis-elements by a gel mobility shift assay with the Brn2 or Pax6 DNA-binding domain (DBD).

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

The left panel shows a representative gel mobility shift of the Sox2-Brn2 or Sox2-Pax6 consensus probe by Brn2-DBD or Pax6-DBD. A NF-κB consensus probe was used as a negative control. The probe sequences were the following: Sox2-Brn2: GGGTAGTGTGGACAAAAGGCAATAATTAGCATGAGAATC, Sox2-Pax6: GGGAAATATTCATTGTTGTTGCTCACCTACCATGGA, and NF-κB: GGGAGTTGAGGGGACTTTCCCAGGC. The right graphs show the radioactivity in the expected area of the gel shift of Brn2-DBD or Pax6-DBD (surrounded by red line). The values indicate the fold increase of the band intensity when the intensity of the positive control was set as 1.0.

Figure 5. Screening of cis-elements by a gel mobility shift assay with Sox2-Brn2 or Sox2-Pax6 full-length protein heterodimer.

Figure 5

Open in a new tab

The left panel shows a representative gel mobility shift of Sox2-Brn2 or Sox2-Pax6 consensus probes by the heterodimer of Sox2-Brn2 or Sox2-Pax6 full-length proteins. A supershift of the band with anti-Brn2 or -Pax6 antibody is also shown in the 3rd lane. The probe sequences were the following: Sox2-Brn2: GGGTAGTGTGGACAAAAGGCAATAATTAGCATGAGAATC andSox2-Pax6: GGGAAATATTCATTGTTGTTGCTCACCTACCATGGA. The right graphs show the radioactivity in the expected area of the gel shift of Sox2-Brn2 or Sox2-Pax6 full-length proteins. The threshold is the average signal intensity plus 1× standard deviation.

Table 3. Results of gel mobility shift assay.

probe No. BD-Brn2 Sox2/Brn2 BD-Pax6 Sox2/Pax6 BD-Oct6 probe No. BD-Brn2 Sox2/Brn2 BD-Pax6 Sox2/Pax6 BD-Oct6
1 − − − − − 64 + + + + +
2 − − − − − 65 + − + − +
3 − − − − − 66 − − + − +
4a + + − + + 67 − − − − −
4b + + − − + 68 + − + − +
4c + + − − + 69 − − − − +
5 + − − − − 70 − − − − +
6 + − − − + 71 + − + − +
7 − − − − − 72 + − + − +
8 − − − − − 73 − − − − −
9 − − − − − 74 − − − − −
10 + − − − − 75 + − + − +
11 − − − − − 76 + − + − +
12 + − − − − 77 − − − − −
13 − − − − − 78 − + − + +
14 − − − − − 79 − − − − −
15 − − − − − 80 − − − − +
16a + + − + + 81 − − − − −
16b + + − + + 82 − − − − +
17 + − − − + 83 − + + + +
18 − − + − + 84 − + + + −
19 − − − − − 85 − − + − −
20 − − − − − 86 − − − − −
21 − − − − − 87 + − + − +
22 − − − − − 88 − − − + −
23 − − − − − 89 − + + + −
24 − − − − − 90 + − + − +
25 − − − − − 91 − + + − +
26 + − − − + 92 + − + − +
27 − − − − − 93 − − − − −
28 − − − − − 94 + − + − +
29 − − − − + 95 − − + − +
30 + − − − + 96 − − − − −
31 − + − + − 97 + + + + +
32 + − + − + 98 + − − − +
33 + − + − + 99 + − + − +
34 − − + − − 100 − − + − +
35 + − + − + 101 + − − − +
36 + − + − + 102a − + − − −
37 − − − − − 102b − − − − −
38 − − − − + 102c + − + − +
39 + − + − + 104 + − + − +
40 + − + − + 105 + − + − +
41 - − + − + 106 − − − − −
42 − − + − − 107 − − − − −
43 − − − − − 108 + − + − +
44 − − − − − 109 − − − − −
45 − + + + + 110 − − − − +
46 − + + + + 111 + − − − +
47 − − − − + 112 + − − − +
48 − − + − − 113 − − − − −
49 − + − + − 114 − − − − −
50 − − − − − 115 − − − − −
51 − − + − − 116 − − − − −
52 − − − - − 117 − + − − −
53 − − − − − 118 − + − + −
54 − − − − + 119 − − − − −
55 − − − − + 120 − − − + +
56 + − + − + 121 + + + + +
57 − − + − + 122 + − − + +
58 − − − − + 123 − − − − −
59 + − + − + 124 − − − − −
60 + + + − + 125 + − − + +
61 − − + − + 126 + + + + +
62 + + + − + 127 + + + + +
63 − − + − + 128 − + + + −
Open in a new tab

The results in the gel mobility shift assay are summarized. The positive result is indicated with “+”. The negative result is indicated with “-“. The bold characters indicate “double positive” probe with which both DNA-binding domain (BD-Brn2 or BD-Pax6) and Sox2 heterodimers (Sox2/Brn2 or Sox2/Pax6) interact. The “probe No.” corresponds to Fig. 3.

Table 4. The list of “double positive” probes.

double positive probes selected for Luc assay : (Bold in Table 3)
4a 4b 4c 16a 16b 45
46 60 62 64 83 84
89 97 121 126 127 128
Open in a new tab

The double positive probes in Table 3 are listed. They were employed for luciferase assay (Fig. 6).

In addition, we performed a gel shift assay with Sox2-Oct6 (Supplementary Figure 3). The results suggested that this complex could bind to part of the candidate cis-elements. However, Oct-6 expression in NSPCs has not been confirmed in previous studies, and our immunohistochemistry did not support Oct-6 expression in NSPCs (data not shown). In addition, as already mentioned we previously confirmed that PQBP1 is not highly expressed in glia compared to neurons [1], indicating that Sox2-Oct6 does not contribute to the transcriptional control of PQBP1. Thus, we did not use the complex in the following experiments.

In this study, we did not perform ChIP assay because the gel shift assays were multiplexed. However, ChIP assay might have strengthened our results, even though the bases of gel shift assay (supershift assay) and ChIP assay are overlapped.

PQBP1 is Regulated by Sox2

The double-positive sequences were distributed both upstream and downstream of the PQBP1 gene (Supplementary Figure 4). Four repeats of probe sequences in tandem were subcloned into the upstream sequence of the luciferase gene in reporter plasmids, and their cis-activities were tested in a luciferase assay. We cotransfected reporter and effector plasmids (Sox2+Pax6 or Sox2+Brn2) into P19 cells (Figure 6A). P19 cells, which are equivalent to epiblasts, were selected as Sox2 and PQBP1-expressing cells [1].

Figure 6. Screening of cis-elements by luciferase assay.

Figure 6

Open in a new tab

(A) The double-positive cis-elements (Table 1) were subcloned into a reporter plasmid (pGreenFire1-mCMV), and their transcriptional activity was tested by cotransfection with effecter plasmids (Sox2+Pax6 or Sox2+Brn2) into P19 cells. Fold activation was calculated in comparison to the activity of the negative control reporter plasmid possessing a nonsense sequence as the cis-element. We simultaneously tested positive controls (PC) and negative controls (NC) that possess Sox2-Pax6 or Sox2-Brn2 consensus and mutated elements, respectively. Red and yellow bars represent transcriptional activity of PC and NC, respectively. (B) The transcriptional activity of the cis-element (P16A) in neural stem/progenitor cells in vivo was examined by in utero electroporation of the reporter plasmid. Electroporation was performed on E14 and sampling was done on E15. The positive control reporter plasmid, pGreenFire1-PC (Sox2+Pax6)-mCMV, possesses a Sox2-Pax6 consensus sequence. pGreenFire1-16A-mCMV was generated by inserting the 16A oligpnucleotides:GTGAACCCTTTCAGATTTAGTGACGTAGCTTCACAAAGTGATTAA into pGreenFire1-mCMV. Confocal microscopy (LSM510META, CarlZeiss AG) with 40X water emersion lens was used to visualize the fluorescence. Green fluorescent protein signals were detected in NSPCs, even though the DsRed signals were weaker than the positive control, indicating that 16A possessed strong enhancer activity in vivo.

The luciferase assay showed obvious transactivation by the combination of transcription factors on the 18 cis-elements. The cotransfection of Sox2 and Pax6 showed remarkable transactivation with the #16A and #60 cis-elements (Figure 6A). The cotransfection of Sox2 and Brn2 showed less remarkable transactivation, and most cis-elements showed definite higher transactivation than that of negative controls (Figure 6A). In these experiments, we used positive controls (PC) and negative controls (NC) possessing Sox2-Pax6 or Sox2-Brn2 consensus and mutated elements, respectively (Figure 6A).

Next, we tested whether the cis-element that was selected by the luciferase assay could induce transactivationin NSPCs in vivo (Figure 6B). We performed electroporation of the reporter plasmids (pGreenFire1-PC-mCMV and pGreenFire1-16A-mCMV), which possessed enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP) gene cassettes downstream of the cis-element (Figure 6A), into the brain of E14 mouse embryos and tested whether the reporter EGFP gene was expressed. As a marker of transfected cells, we cotransfected pLVSIN-CAG-pur-DsRed.When we used a positive control reporter plasmid (pGreenFire1-PC-mCMV), we observed EGFP signals in transfected cells (Ds-Red-positive cells) (Figure 6B), indicating that the positive control cis-element for Sox2-Pax6 actually worked in vivo. Similarly, we observed green fluorescence in red cells when we transfected pGreenFire1-16A-mCMV (Figure 6B and Supplementary Figure 5A). EGFP signal was detected in some cells outside of ventricular and subventricular zones, probably because NSPCs were differentiated before EGFP protein was completely degraded. Notably, the ratio between GFP and DsRed was clearly higher with pGreenFire1-16A-mCMV than with pGreenFire1-PC-mCMV, indicating a strong enhancer activity of 16A sequence. Meanwhile, in untero electroporation of a negative control plasmid, pGreenFire1-NC (Sox2+Pax6)-mCMV did not produce EGFP signals, indicating that the result was not artifact (Supplementary Figure 5B). All the results supported that the cis-element we selected possessed enhancer activity in NSPCs in vivo.

Sox2 Knockout Decreased PQBP1 in vivo

Finally, we tested whether a decrease of Sox2 affected PQBP1 expression in vivo. We used heterozygous Sox2-knockout (Sox2+/−) mice in which the Sox2 expression was almost 50% of control mice (Figure 7A, B). The levels of expression of PQBP1 in Sox2+/− NSPCs were about 50% of the control, judging from the western blot analysis of the primary NSPCs prepared from E18embryonic brains (Figure 7A, B), and about 30% of the control, judging from the immunohistochemical staining of the embryonic brain (E18) (Figure 7C, D). These results strongly supported that Sox2 regulated PQBP1 expression in NSPCs not only in vitro, but also in vivo.

Figure 7. Sox2 regulates PQBP1 expression in vivo.

Figure 7

Open in a new tab

(A) Western blot of primary-cultured neural stem progenitor cells from two Sox2+/− mice and two littermate mice (WT) (E14). Sox2 and PQBP1 proteins were both reduced. (B) Ratios of western blot signal intensities (Sox2/internal control and PQBP1/internal control) were quantified. Asterisk indicates statistical differences (N = 6, p<0.05 by Student’s t-test). (C) Immunohistochemistry of Sox2 and PQBP1 in Sox2+/− and littermate (WT) mice (E18). Digital images were captured by an Olympus IX71 microscope. (D) Quantification of the intensity of Sox2 and PQBP1 immunostain signals from ventricular surface to cortical surface. Cortex at E18 were divided into 10 square areas from ventricular surface (0%) to cortical surface (100%) as shown in Figure 7C. The total signals were acquired in each square, background signals (mean signals in ventricles, N = 5) were subtracted from them, and the mean and SD values were calculated (N = 5). Asterisks indicate statistical differences (p<0.01 by Student’s t-test).

Discussion

In this study, we revealed the involvement of Sox2 in the transcriptional regulation of PQBP1in NSPCs. This conclusion was supported by multiple findings in vitro and in vivo. First, PQBP1 was coexpressed with Sox2 in NSPCs (Figure 1, 2). Second, Sox2 bound to multiple cis-elements that possessed transcriptional activities (Figure 3–6). Third, Sox2 haploinsufficiency reduced the levels of expression of PQBP1 in vivo (Figure 7). All of these findings indicated that PQBP1 was the downstream target of Sox2 in NSPCs.

Sox2 is a central player in various types of stem cells including ES cells. Therefore, one may ask why PQBP1 is not highly expressed in embryo before E11 [12] or in ES cells (our unpublished data). Actually Sox2 forms a heterodimer with Oct-3/4 in ES cells [34] and regulates toti-potency as shown in iPS cells [35]. However, the inner cellular mass that corresponds to ES cells does not need Sox2 for pluripotency, although it has been suggested that maternal Sox2 protein that remains in the cells compensates for the inactivation of Sox2 by gene targeting [36]. Considering that the expression of Oct-3/4 is extremely low in NSPCs [30], [37], that the expression of Sox2 is found in epiblasts and NSPCs, and that Oct-3/4 is sufficient for reprogramming from NSPCs [23], the demand for Sox2 might be larger in NSPCs.

Human ID diseases that are linked to PQBP1, such as Renpenning syndrome, Golabi-Ito-Hall syndrome, and Southerland-Haan syndrome, show multiple symptoms, such as microcephaly, short stature, lean body, and small testis [23]. The molecular pathways that result in each symptom are not yet understood. We have shown previously that the levels of expression of PQBP1 are correlated with the behavioral abnormalities. In PQBP1-knockdown mice in which the PQBP1 protein levels are reduced to 50% in the adult brain, we observed that anxiety-related cognition is impaired [38]. A consistent result was obtained in that Drosophila hypomorph mutants of PQBP1 homologs possessed a lower learning ability [39]. In addition, PQBP1 expression in NSPCs could be related to microcephaly, which is another phenotype of PQBP1-linked ID patients. With respect to these clinical aspects, the conclusion of this study that Sox2 controls the transcription of PQBP1 gene in NSPCs is critical.

There are various approaches to possibly modify the symptoms of PQBP1-linked ID patients. Because there are various alternative splicing isoforms of PQBP1 and the disease mutations of PQBP1 are complex, some isoforms that partially retain the functions of the full-length PQBP1 might be expressed in patients. Therefore, in analogy with Duchenne muscular dystrophy, increasing the levels of expression of partially active isoforms may alleviate the symptoms of patients. It would be also possible to enhance PQBP1 expression at transcription level in order to increase functional PQBP1. In this regard, the findings of this study might be useful for the development of a novel therapeutic approach that can be used to modulate the levels of expression of PQBP1 through Sox2.

Our findings were also important for developmental biology. Sox2 is now recognized as a key transcription factor that is involved in multiple neurological diseases [40]. This in turn indicates that Sox2 plays multiple physiological roles during development and in adulthood for normal brain morphology and function. Our results indicated thatPQBP1 is a target molecule of Sox2, which is part of Sox2 developmental functions.

The homozygous deletion of Sox2 is mostly lethal in mice, but the phenotype that is observed with other types of Sox2 mutations are thought to partially be mediated by PQBP1. An important finding from the Sox2 conditional depletion in the brain is neurodegeneration [41]. Those authors made 2 types of Sox2-mutant mice. In one model involving β-geo knockin mice, they observed Sox2 expression in adult neurons and adult neurogenic regions and reduced cellular proliferation in the hippocampus and periventricular area [41]. They also observed in another mutated mouse model, in which a neural cell-specific enhancer was deleted, that Sox2 depletion in adult neurons resulted in the abnormal morphology of neurons and cytoplasmic inclusion body formation [41]. Considering these experimental results, PQBP1 could be a target of Sox2 not only during development, but also in adulthood. The role of PQBP1 in adult neurodegeneration could be our next target of investigation. Insufficiency of the Sox2-PQBP1 axis could be a cause of degeneration, and its upregulation might be used as a therapy of degeneration in the future as a regenerative approach, as suggested previously [42].

Methods

Plasmid Construction

For construction of the GST-fusion vectors, cDNA fragments of full-length Sox2 (forward 5′-ATGTATAACATGATGGAGACGGAGC-3′, reverse 5′-TCACATGTGCGACAGGGGCAG-3′), full-length Brn2 (forward 5′-ATGGCGACCGCAGCGTCTAAC-3′, reverse 5′-TCACTGGACGGGCGTCTGCAC-3′), the DNA-binding domain of Brn2(forward 5′-GAGGCAGACTCATCCTCGGGCA-3′, reverse 5′-TGGCGTGTCCCTACTACCCCCATA-3′), full-length Pax6 (forward 5′-ATGCAGAACAGTCACAGCGG-3, reverse5′-TTACTGTAATCGAGGCCAGTACTGAGA-3′), the DNA-binding domain of Pax6 (forward 5′-ATCAGTTCTAACGGAGAAGAC-3′, reverse 5′-GCTGCTGATAGGAATGTGAC-3′), and the DNA-binding domain of Oct6 (forward 5′-GAGACCGACTCGTCCAGCGGCA-3′, reverse 5′-CCCCAGCTCCCCAGGCGCATAAA-3′) were amplified by polymerase chain reaction from B6 wild-type mouse embryonic brain RNA and subcloned into pGEX-6P-1 (GE Healthcare, Buckinghamshire, UK) between BamHI-EcoRI (for Sox2, Brn2, and Oct6 full-length and DNA-binding domains) or BamHI-XhoI (for Pax6 full-length and DNA-binding domain). The sequences were confirmed after subcloning.

For Mammalian expression vectors, full-length Sox2, Brn2, and Pax6 cDNAs cleaved out from pGEX-6P-1with BamHI and NotI were subcloned into pBS II SK+ (Agilent Technologies, Inc., Santa Clara, CA, USA) and again subcloned into pCI-neo (Promega Corporation, Madison, WI, USA) with single SalI site (Sox2 and Brn2) or SalI and NotI sites (Pax6).

Expression and Purification of GST-fusion Proteins

GST-fusion proteins of full-length and the DNA-binding domain of transcription factors were induced in Escherichia coli cells (BL21) by 0.1 mM IPTG for 6 h at 25°C. The cells were collected, washed twice with PBS, resuspended in lysis buffer [10 mM Na2HPO4, 1.8 mM KH2PO4, 500 mM NaCl, 2.7 mM KCl,10% glycerol, 1 mM DTT, 0.5 mM PMSF, and protease inhibitor “complete” (GE Healthcare)], and sonicated. GST-fusion proteins were purified by glutathione-sepharose 4B according to the commercial protocol (GE Healthcare). Sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS)-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis was performed in order to confirm the sizes of the GST-fusion proteins. Western blot analysis was performed in order to test the validity of the proteins with anti-Sox2 (ab5603, EMD Millipore Corporation, Billerica, MA, USA), anti-pax6 (Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank, Iowa City, Iowa, USA), anti-Brn2(sc-6029, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc., Santa Cruz, CA, USA), and anti-GST (sc-459, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.) antibodies.

Gel Mobility Shift Assay

Sense and antisense oligonucleotides at 5′ terminals containing 5 dGs at the 5′-end were annealed and radiolabeled with a Random Primer DNA Labeling Kit (Takara Bio Inc., Shiga, Japan) with [α-32P]dCTP (MP Biomedicals,LLC, Santa Ana, CA,USA). Twenty nanogram of each GST-fusion protein was incubated with 40,000–50,000 cpm of labeled probe in binding buffer (10% glycerol; 20 mM HEPES, pH 7.8; 45 mM KCl; 10 mM NaCl; 1 mM EDTA, pH 8.0; 1 mM DTT; 0.2 µg/µL BSA; and 0.1% nonidet P-40) with poly-dIdC (50 ng, Sigma-Aldrich Co., LLC, St. Louis, MO, USA) at room temperature for 30 min and then separated in a 6% polyacrylamide gel with 0.25×TBE (25 min prerun and then run at 4°Cat 120 V for 2.5 h). For heterodimerization, two proteins (each 20 ng) were preincubated in binding buffer at 4°C for 100 min before the addition of the probe. The reaction was extended for another h at 4°C and separated by electrophoresis. Radioactivity of the band was quantified with BAS4000 (FujiFilm Corporation, Tokyo, Japan).

Immunohistochemistry

E18 mouse cortex was fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde overnight at 4°C and embedded in paraffin. The paraffin blocks were cut into 5 µm sagittal sections. After rehydration, the sections were stained with anti-PQBP1 that was produced in rabbit (1∶200, R00470, Sigma-Aldrich Co., LLC) and anti-Sox2 that was produced in goat (1∶200, Sox2-Y17, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.). The stains were visualized with AlexaFluor 488 in rabbit and Cy3 goat-conjugated secondary antibodies (1∶1,000, Dojindo Laboratories, Kumamoto, Japan). DAPI solution (1∶10,000, Dojindo Laboratories) was added to the secondary antibody solutionsin order tovisualize the nuclei. Digital images were captured by an Olympus IX71 microscope (Olympus Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) with a 10X/0.30objective lens (Figure 2B, 7) or a confocal microscopy (LSM510META, Carl Zeiss AG, Oberkochen, Germany) with 10X, 20X or 40X water emersion lens (Figure 1, 2A, 6B and supplementary figures). Image acquisition and immunofluorescent intensity quantification were performed with MetaMorph Image Browser software (Molecular Devices, LLC, Sunnyvale, CA, USA).

Western Blot

Neurospheres prepared from E14 mouse telencephalon were dissolved in SDS sample buffer (62.5 mM Tris-HCl, pH 6.8; 2% SDS; 2.5% 2-mercaptoethanol; and 5% glycerol). Protein concentration was quantified with the BCA method (Micro BCA Protein Assay Reagent kit; Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Waltham, MA, USA). Twenty-five µg of proteins were applied for each lane. Anti-Sox2 produced in rabbit (ab5603, EMD Millipore Corporation) and anti-PQBP1produced in rabbit (R00470, Sigma-Aldrich Co., LLC) primary antibodies were used at 1∶500, and anti-GAPDH produced in mouse (MAB374, EMD Millipore Corporation) was used at 1∶10,000. Horseradish peroxidase-conjugated anti-Rabbit IgG (GE Healthcare) and horseradish peroxidase-conjugated anti-Mouse IgG (GE Healthcare) were used at 1∶3,000. Antibodies were diluted in TBS with Tween 20 (TBST) in 5% skim milk. ECL prime (GE Healthcare) was used to detect the bands according to the commercial protocol.

Luciferase Assay

pGreenFire1-PC(Sox2+Brn2)-mCMV, pGreenFire1-NC(Sox2+Brn2)-mCMV, pGreenFire1-PC(Sox2+Pax6)-mCMV, or pGreenFire1-NC(Sox2+Pax6)-mCMV possessing active [29] or inactive cis-elements [43] were generated by annealing the tetramerized oligonucleotides into pGreenFire-1-mCMV reporter vector (System Biosciences, Mountain View, CA,USA). Similarly oligonucleotides of finally selected 18 cis-elements were subcloned into pGreenFire-1-mCMV reporter vector. The pGreenFire-1-mCMV reporter vector (200 ng), the pCI-neo effecter (pCI-neo-Sox2, Pax6 or Brn2∶20 ng), and pGL4.73 [hRluc/SV40] (Promega Corporation) (5 ng), which was used as an internal control, were cotransfected into P19 cells (4×104/96-well plate) by lipofectamine 2000 (Life Technologies Corporation, Grand Island, NY, USA) according to the commercial protocol, when the cells became 80% confluent. Transfection was done at least in triplicate. Luciferase values were tested with a dual-glo luciferase assay system (Promega Corporation), and the average luciferase expression is presented with standard errors.

In Utero Electroporation

For in utero electroporation, plasmids were prepared withan Endo-Free plasmid purification kit (QIAGEN Inc., Valencia, CA, USA). One µg of tetramerized pGreenFire1-PC (Sox2+Pax6)-mCMV or pGreenFire1-NC (Sox2+pax6)-mCMV [43] and pGreenFire1-16A-mCMVtogether with a DsRed expressing vector pLVSIN-CAG-pur-DsRed were electroporated into embryonic cerebral cortex at E14. The embryonic brain was dissected 24 h later and then fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde. Coronal tissue sections (200 µm) were visualized by confocal microscopy (LSM510META, CarlZeiss AG, Oberkochen, Germany).

Ethics Statement

This study was performed in strict accordance with the recommendations in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the National Institutes of Health. The protocol was approved by the Committee on the Ethics of Animal Experiments of the Tokyo Medical and Dental University (Permit Number: 0130225A). All surgery was performed under ether of isoflurane anesthesia, and every effort was made to minimize suffering.

Supporting Information

Figure S1

Confirmation of the gel mobility shift assay conditions. Positive control probes (Figure 4) bound to Sox2, Brn2, or Pax6 but not to GST protein.

(TIFF)

Click here for additional data file. (2.4MB, tiff)
Figure S2

Actual data of gel mobility shift assay in screening of cis-elements. (A) Screening of cis-elements by a gel mobility shift assay with Sox2-Brn2 or Sox2-Pax6 full-length protein heterodimer. (B) Screening of cis-elements by a gel mobility shift assay with the Brn2 or Pax6 DNA-binding domain (DBD).

(TIFF)

Click here for additional data file. (5.4MB, tiff)
Figure S3

Screening of cis -elements by gel mobility shift assay with the Oct6 DNA-binding domain (DBD). The left panel shows a representative gel mobility shift of the Sox2-Oct6 consensus probe by Oct6-DBD. A NF-κB consensus probe was used as a negative control. The graphs on the right show the radioactivity in the expected area of the gel shift of Oct6-DBD (surrounded by red line).

(TIFF)

Click here for additional data file. (1.6MB, tiff)
Figure S4

Locations of the double-positive sequences both upstream and downstream of the PQBP1 gene. The double-screening positive cis-elements were distributed both upstream and downstream of the PQBP1 gene as clusters.

(TIFF)

Click here for additional data file. (387KB, tiff)
Figure S5

Larger magnification of in utero electroporated NSPCs. (A) NSPCs transfected by pGreenFire1-16A-mCMV and pLVSIN-CAG-pur-DsRed were visualized by confocal microscopy with 40X water emersion lens. (B) A negative control plasmid, pGreenFire1-NC (Sox2+Pax6)-mCMV was also transfected into E14 embryonic brains by in utero electroporation. No EGFP signal was detected on E15.

(TIFF)

Click here for additional data file. (4.5MB, tiff)

Acknowledgments

We thank Natsue Yoshimura, Yo-ichi Wada, Tayoko Tajima, and Chiharu Mizoi in our department for their technical support and discussion.

Funding Statement

This work was supported by Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research on Innovative Areas (Foundation of Synapse and Neurocircuit Pathology) and Strategic Research Program for Brain Sciences (SRPBS) from Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan, to HO. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1. Waragai M, Lammers CH, Takeuchi S, Imafuku I, Udagawa Y, et al. (1999) PQBP-1, a novel polyglutamine tract-binding protein, inhibits transcription activation by Brn-2 and affects cell survival. Hum Mol Genet 8: 977–987. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Imafuku I, Waragai M, Takeuchi S, Kanazawa I, Kawabata M, et al. (1998) Polar amino acid-rich sequences bind to polyglutamine tracts. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 253: 16–20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Busch A, Engemann S, Lurz R, Okazawa H, Lehrach H, et al. (2003) Mutant huntingtin promotes the fibrillogenesis of wild-type huntingtin: a potential mechanism for loss of huntingtin function in Huntington’s disease. J Biol Chem 278: 41452–41461. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Okazawa H, Rich T, Chang A, Lin X, Waragai M, et al. (2002) Interaction between mutant ataxin-1 and PQBP-1 affects transcription and cell death. Neuron 34: 701–713. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Llorian M, Beullens M, Andres I, Ortiz JM, Bollen M (2004) SIPP1, a novel pre-mRNA splicing factor and interactor of protein phosphatase-1. Biochem J 378: 229–238. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Komuro A, Saeki M, Kato S (1999) Association of two nuclear proteins, Npw38 and NpwBP, via the interaction between the WW domain and a novel proline-rich motif containing glycine and arginine. J Biol Chem 274: 36513–36519. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Zhang Y, Lindblom T, Chang A, Sudol M, Sluder AE, et al. (2000) Evidence that dim1 associates with proteins involved in pre-mRNA splicing, and delineation of residues essential for dim1 interactions with hnRNP F and Npw38/PQBP-1. Gene 257: 33–43. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Waragai M, Junn E, Kajikawa M, Takeuchi S, Kanazawa I, et al. (2000) PQBP-1/Npw38, a nuclear protein binding to the polyglutamine tract, interacts with U 5–15 kD/dim1p via the carboxyl-terminal domain. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 273: 592–595. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Tapia VE, Nicolaescu E, McDonald CB, Musi V, Oka T, et al. (2010) Y65C missense mutation in the WW domain of the Golabi-Ito-Hall syndrome protein PQBP1 affects its binding activity and deregulates pre-mRNA splicing. J Biol Chem 285: 19391–19401. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Huang X, Beullens M, Zhang J, Zhou Y, Nicolaescu E, et al. (2009) Structure and function of the two tandem WW domains of the pre-mRNA splicing factor FBP21 (formin-binding protein 21). J Biol Chem 284: 25375–25387. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Kunde SA, Musante L, Grimme A, Fischer U, Muller E, et al. (2011) The X-chromosome-linked intellectual disability protein PQBP1 is a component of neuronal RNA granules and regulates the appearance of stress granules. Hum Mol Genet 20: 4916–4931. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Qi Y, Hoshino M, Wada Y, Marubuchi S, Yoshimura N, et al. (2005) PQBP-1 is expressed predominantly in the central nervous system during development. Eur J Neurosci 22: 1277–1286. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. de Brouwer AP, Yntema HG, Kleefstra T, Lugtenberg D, Oudakker AR, et al. (2007) Mutation frequencies of X-linked mental retardation genes in families from the EuroMRX consortium. Hum Mutat 28: 207–208. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Stevenson RE, Bennett CW, Abidi F, Kleefstra T, Porteous M, et al. (2005) Renpenning syndrome comes into focus. Am J Med Genet A 134: 415–421. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Lenski C, Abidi F, Meindl A, Gibson A, Platzer M, et al. (2004) Novel truncating mutations in the polyglutamine tract binding protein 1 gene (PQBP1) cause Renpenning syndrome and X-linked mental retardation in another family with microcephaly. Am J Hum Genet 74: 777–780. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Kleefstra T, Franken CE, Arens YH, Ramakers GJ, Yntema HG, et al. (2004) Genotype-phenotype studies in three families with mutations in the polyglutamine-binding protein 1 gene (PQBP1). Clin Genet 66: 318–326. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Kalscheuer VM, Freude K, Musante L, Jensen LR, Yntema HG, et al. (2003) Mutations in the polyglutamine binding protein 1 gene cause X-linked mental retardation. Nat Genet 35: 313–315. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Takahashi K, Tanabe K, Ohnuki M, Narita M, Ichisaka T, et al. (2007) Induction of pluripotent stem cells from adult human fibroblasts by defined factors. Cell 131: 861–872. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Okazawa H, Okamoto K, Ishino F, Ishino-Kaneko T, Takeda S, et al. (1991) The oct3 gene, a gene for an embryonic transcription factor, is controlled by a retinoic acid repressible enhancer. Embo J 10: 2997–3005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Scholer HR, Ruppert S, Suzuki N, Chowdhury K, Gruss P (1990) New type of POU domain in germ line-specific protein Oct-4. Nature 344: 435–439. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Rosner MH, Vigano MA, Ozato K, Timmons PM, Poirier F, et al. (1990) A POU-domain transcription factor in early stem cells and germ cells of the mammalian embryo. Nature 345: 686–692. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Okamoto K, Okazawa H, Okuda A, Sakai M, Muramatsu M, et al. (1990) A novel octamer binding transcription factor is differentially expressed in mouse embryonic cells. Cell 60: 461–472. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Kim JB, Greber B, Arauzo-Bravo MJ, Meyer J, Park KI, et al. (2009) Direct reprogramming of human neural stem cells by OCT4. Nature 461: 649–643. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Nishimoto M, Fukushima A, Okuda A, Muramatsu M (1999) The gene for the embryonic stem cell coactivator UTF1 carries a regulatory element which selectively interacts with a complex composed of Oct-3/4 and Sox-2. Mol Cell Biol 19: 5453–5465. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Yuan H, Corbi N, Basilico C, Dailey L (1995) Developmental-specific activity of the FGF-4 enhancer requires the synergistic action of Sox2 and Oct-3. Genes Dev 9: 2635–2645. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Dailey L, Yuan H, Basilico C (1994) Interaction between a novel F9-specific factor and octamer-binding proteins is required for cell-type-restricted activity of the fibroblast growth factor 4 enhancer. Mol Cell Biol 14: 7758–7769. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Kamachi Y, Uchikawa M, Kondoh H (2000) Pairing SOX off: with partners in the regulation of embryonic development. Trends Genet 16: 182–187. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Pesce M, Scholer HR (2001) Oct-4: gatekeeper in the beginnings of mammalian development. Stem Cells 19: 271–278. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Tanaka S, Kamachi Y, Tanouchi A, Hamada H, Jing N, et al. (2004) Interplay of SOX and POU factors in regulation of the Nestin gene in neural primordial cells. Mol Cell Biol 24: 8834–8846. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Chin JH, Shiwaku H, Goda O, Komuro A, Okazawa H (2009) Neural stem cells express Oct-3/4. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 388: 247–251. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Lengner CJ, Camargo FD, Hochedlinger K, Welstead GG, Zaidi S, et al. (2007) Oct4 expression is not required for mouse somatic stem cell self-renewal. Cell Stem Cell 1: 403–415. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Monuki ES, Kuhn R, Weinmaster G, Trapp BD, Lemke G (1990) Expression and activity of the POU transcription factor SCIP. Science 249: 1300–1303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Monuki ES, Weinmaster G, Kuhn R, Lemke G (1989) SCIP: a glial POU domain gene regulated by cyclic AMP. Neuron 3: 783–793. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Masui S, Nakatake Y, Toyooka Y, Shimosato D, Yagi R, et al. (2007) Pluripotency governed by Sox2 via regulation of Oct3/4 expression in mouse embryonic stem cells. Nat Cell Biol 9: 625–635. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Yamanaka S, Blau HM (2010) Nuclear reprogramming to a pluripotent state by three approaches. Nature 465: 704–712. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Avilion AA, Nicolis SK, Pevny LH, Perez L, Vivian N, et al. (2003) Multipotent cell lineages in early mouse development depend on SOX2 function. Genes Dev 17: 126–140. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Okuda T, Tagawa K, Qi ML, Hoshio M, Ueda H, et al. (2004) Oct-3/4 repression accelerates differentiation of neural progenitor cells in vitro and in vivo. Brain Res Mol Brain Res 132: 18–30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Ito H, Yoshimura N, Kurosawa M, Ishii S, Nukina N, et al. (2009) Knock-down of PQBP1 impairs anxiety-related cognition in mouse. Hum Mol Genet 18: 4239–4254. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Tamura T, Horiuchi D, Chen YC, Sone M, Miyashita T, et al. (2010) Drosophila PQBP1 regulates learning acquisition at projection neurons in aversive olfactory conditioning. J Neurosci 30: 14091–14101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Engelen E, Akinci U, Bryne JC, Hou J, Gontan C, et al. (2011) Sox2 cooperates with Chd7 to regulate genes that are mutated in human syndromes. Nat Genet 43: 607–611. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Ferri AL, Cavallaro M, Braida D, Di Cristofano A, Canta A, et al. (2004) Sox2 deficiency causes neurodegeneration and impaired neurogenesis in the adult mouse brain. Development 131: 3805–3819. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Lindvall O, Kokaia Z (2006) Stem cells for the treatment of neurological disorders. Nature 441: 1094–1096. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Inoue M, Kamachi Y, Matsunami H, Imada K, Uchikawa M, et al. (2007) PAX6 and SOX2-dependent regulation of the Sox2 enhancer N-3 involved in embryonic visual system development. Genes Cells 12: 1049–1061. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Figure S1

Confirmation of the gel mobility shift assay conditions. Positive control probes (Figure 4) bound to Sox2, Brn2, or Pax6 but not to GST protein.

(TIFF)

Click here for additional data file. (2.4MB, tiff)
Figure S2

Actual data of gel mobility shift assay in screening of cis-elements. (A) Screening of cis-elements by a gel mobility shift assay with Sox2-Brn2 or Sox2-Pax6 full-length protein heterodimer. (B) Screening of cis-elements by a gel mobility shift assay with the Brn2 or Pax6 DNA-binding domain (DBD).

(TIFF)

Click here for additional data file. (5.4MB, tiff)
Figure S3

Screening of cis -elements by gel mobility shift assay with the Oct6 DNA-binding domain (DBD). The left panel shows a representative gel mobility shift of the Sox2-Oct6 consensus probe by Oct6-DBD. A NF-κB consensus probe was used as a negative control. The graphs on the right show the radioactivity in the expected area of the gel shift of Oct6-DBD (surrounded by red line).

(TIFF)

Click here for additional data file. (1.6MB, tiff)
Figure S4

Locations of the double-positive sequences both upstream and downstream of the PQBP1 gene. The double-screening positive cis-elements were distributed both upstream and downstream of the PQBP1 gene as clusters.

(TIFF)

Click here for additional data file. (387KB, tiff)
Figure S5

Larger magnification of in utero electroporated NSPCs. (A) NSPCs transfected by pGreenFire1-16A-mCMV and pLVSIN-CAG-pur-DsRed were visualized by confocal microscopy with 40X water emersion lens. (B) A negative control plasmid, pGreenFire1-NC (Sox2+Pax6)-mCMV was also transfected into E14 embryonic brains by in utero electroporation. No EGFP signal was detected on E15.

(TIFF)

Click here for additional data file. (4.5MB, tiff)

Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

RESOURCES