Skip to main content
Acta Orthopaedica logoLink to Acta Orthopaedica
. 2013 May 31;84(3):319–322. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2013.792028

Rising incidence of Enterococcus species in microbiological specimens from orthopedic patients correlates to increased use of cefuroxime

A study concentrating on tissue samples

Peter Christian Siesing 1,, Jens Peter Alva-Jørgensen 1, Jakob Brodersen 3, Magnus Arpi 2, Poul Einar Jensen 1
PMCID: PMC3715828  PMID: 23594224

Abstract

Background and purpose

Enterococci are emerging causes of severe infections, including wound and bone infections in orthopedic patients. The main purpose of this study was to determine whether there was a correlation between the incidence of enterococci in tissue samples (biopsies) from orthopedic patients and consumption of cefuroxime in the orthopedic department.

Methods and results

Data were obtained from the department of clinical microbiology and the hospital pharmacy. The consumption of cefuroxime successively increased from 40 defined daily doses (DDD)/103 bed days in 2002 to 212 DDD/103 bed days in 2009. The incidence of patients with enterococci in tissue samples increased steadily from 1.03/103 bed days in 2002 to 5.90/103 bed days in 2009. Regression analysis revealed a significant correlation between the consumption of cefuroxime and the incidence of enterococci.

Interpretation

Continuous surveillance of species distribution, resistance rates, and antibiotic consumption is of utmost importance for optimal antibiotic strategy in orthopedic patients.


There is a well-documented global increase in multiresistant microorganisms as causes of different clinical infections. This increase is often correlated to a high consumption of broad-spectrum antibiotics, especially cephalosporins and fluoroquinolones (ESAC 2010). Furthermore, enterococci are now reported to be the third leading cause of nosocomial infections (Hidron et al. 2008). The same tendency has also been observed in Denmark, where the total consumption of cephalosporins and fluoroquinolones has increased 3-fold in the 10-year period 2000–2009 (DANMAP 2009).

The reason for the emerging enterococcal infections is not fully understood, but an important contributory factor is probably the selection pressure from increasing consumption of cephalosporins. This promotes enterococci, which are all inherently resistant to this group of antibiotics (Pallares et al. 1993, Leclerq and Courvalin 2005). For years, penicillinase-stable penicillins and first-generation cephalosporins have been the preferred antibiotics for treatment and prophylaxis in orthopedic patients. Today, cefuroxime (a second-generation cephalosporin) is widely and increasingly used in orthopedic departments in many countries (Engesæter et al. 2003). The Danish Orthopaedic Society recommends cefuroxime prophylaxis for prosthetic surgery and osteosynthesis (DOS 2010).

In this retrospective study, we investigated whether there was a correlation between the rising incidence of enterococcal infections and antibiotic consumption in the orthopedic department at Herlev University Hospital. Our findings could have consequences for the future choice of strategy for antibiotic treatment and prophylaxis in orthopedic patients.

Materials and methods

Microbiological data were obtained from the laboratory database at the Department of Clinical Microbiology, Herlev University Hospital. The following data were retrieved for patients admitted to the orthopedic department: identity of patient, type of specimen (including total number of tissue cultures), sampling date, culture results, and results of susceptibility testing.

Tissue culture results from the orthopedic department in the 20-year period 1990–2009 were divided into 5 periods of 4 years to show changes in species distribution over time. Differentiation between bone and soft tissue biopsies was not possible in this study. All the cultures from tissue where included irrespective of the diagnosis of the patient. The 12 most frequent bacterial species or bacterial groups were selected for analysis of changes in species distribution over time. For every patient, only 1 incident was included. An incident was defined as isolation of a microorganism in 1 or more samples from the same operation. If patients underwent more than 1 operation within 6 months and the microbiology was the same, it was included as 1 incident.

Antibiotic consumption in the orthopedic department was available for each year during the period 2002–2010 (data provided by the hospital pharmacy). Antibiotic consumption was reported as defined daily doses (DDD) (ATC/DDD 2011) per 103 occupied bed days. Consumption of cefuroxime is reported, as this was the only cephalosporin used in the department.

The incidence of Enterococcus spp. was calculated as the number of patients with Enterococcus species in tissue samples per 103 occupied bed days for the period 2002–2010. Only 1 episode per patient was recorded.

Possible correlation between cefuroxime and other antibiotics on the one hand and incidence of Enterococcus on the other was only analyzed for the period during which data for antibiotic consumption were available (2002–2010).

Statistics

Statistical analysis was performed with chi-square test, linear regression analysis, and multiple regression analysis. For linear and multiple linear regression, we tested for deviation of distributions of residuals from a normal distribution using the Shapiro-Wilk test. In no case was the distribution significantly different from a normal distribution (p = 0.5 and p = 0.2, respectively).

For analysis of the relationship between the incidence of Enterococcus in tissue samples from the orthopedic department (dependent variable) and the consumption of 4 different types of antibiotics (independent variables), we used multiple linear regression analysis. Also, time (year) was included in this analysis as an independent variable, to control for any temporal trends unrelated to antibiotic treatment. Multiple linear regression analysis was performed using backward selection with p < 0.1 as a selection criteria. Statistical tests were performed using SPSS software version 17.0.

Results

The numbers of patients with enterococci in tissue samples and the relative proportion of all isolates that were enterococci were markedly higher in the last 2 four-year periods (Table 1). The incidence of patients with enterococci in tissue samples increased steadily from 1.03 in 2002 to 5.9 in 2009. A slight fall to 5.6 was observed in 2010 (Table 2). The vast majority (99%) of enterococci were E. faecalis and E. faecium. Comparing these 2 species, the proportion of E. faecium increased from 7% in the first 3-year period to 15% in the last 3-year period (p < 0.001).

Table 1.

Time trends in species distribution in partients with positive tissue cultures

Period 1990–1993
1994–1997
1998–2001
2002–2005
2006–2009
Microorganism No. of patients Percent No. of patients Percent No. of patients Percent No. of patients Percent No. of patients Percent
Stapylococcus aureus 27 47 38 46 35 43 74 53.5 136 51.5
Coagulase-negative staphylococcus 15 26 26 32 28 34 51 37 78 29.5
Beta-hemolytic streptococcus 4 7 8 10 6 7.5 8 6 21 8
Non-hemolytic streptococcus 2 3.5 2 2.5 1 1 2 1.5 4 1.5
Enterococcus species 11 19 10 12 10 12 33 24 58 22
Corynebacterium species 5 9 9 11 13 16 9 6.5 23 85
E. coli 2 3.5 7 8.5 10 12 7 5 24 9
Enterobacter species 6 10.5 1 1 0 0 0 0 20 7.5
Other Enterobactericeae 10 17.5 14 17 9 11 41 30 48 18
Anaerobic bacteria 3 5 7 8.5 6 7.5 21 15 36 13.5
Candida species 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 2 1
Other types 8 14 7 8.5 8 10 16 11.5 45 17
Total 93 129 127 270 495

Table 2.

Number of patients and incidence of isolation of enterococci from clinical specimens

Year 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
Orthopedic department
 No. of patients with enterococci in tissue samples 18 14 19 32 22 48 85 136 119
 Incidence a of patients with enterococci in tissue samples 1.03 0.8 1.2 2.1 1.5 3.5 4.5 5.9 5.6
Total hospital
 No. of patients with enterococci (all specimens) 906 1,053 1,245 1,420 1,506 1,690 1,973 2,273 2,020
 Incidence a of patients with enterococci (all specimens) 4.5 5.4 6.3 7.3 7.9 9.1 9.2 10.0 9.9

a No. of patients/103 bed days.

The consumption of cefuroxime increased from 40 DDD/103 bed days in 2002 to 212 DDD/103 bed days in 2009 (Figure). In 2009, the consumption of cefuroxime exceeded the consumption of dicloxacillin in the orthopedic department.

graphic file with name ORT-84-319-g001.jpg

Consumption of antibiotics as defined daily doses (DDD) at the Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Herlev University Hospital, 2002–2010.

Linear regression analysis revealed a significant relationship between the consumption of cefuroxime and the incidence of Enterococcus in tissue samples (B = 0.68 (95% CI: 0.43–0.93); p < 0.001).

Multiple regression analysis revealed that of the variables included in the test, consumption of cefuroxime was the only variable statistically significantly correlated to the increasing incidence of enterococci (B = 0.73 (95% CI: 0.52–0.94); p < 0.001). There were no statistically significant correlations between dicloxacillin (95% CI (B): –0.53 to 0.84; p = 0.5), gentamicin (95% CI (B): –0.39 to 14; p = 0.06), and ciprofloxacin (95% CI (B): –4.6 to 1.6; p = 0.3) consumption on the one hand and an increasing incidence of enterococci on the other.

Discussion

From 1990 to 2009, there was an increasing incidence of enterococci in tissue biopsies, and from 2002 to 2010 there was a dramatic increase. The reason for this is unclear, but an important contributory factor could be the selection pressure of increasing consumption of cephalosporins. This promotes enterococci, which are inherently resistant to this group of antibiotics (Pallares et al. 1993, Leclerq and Courvalin 2005).

The increased use of cefuroxime in the orthopedic department is probably caused by several factors. The encatchment area of the hospital has increased, leading to a larger patient population. Considerably more patients with trauma, patients needing amputation, and patients with deep infections are admitted. Though we corrected for the number of bed days, cefuroxime consumption increased more than 3-fold in the period 2002–2010 (Figure). In 2010, the antibiotic prophylaxis given prior to surgery was changed, from cefuroxime to dicloxacillin and gentamicin. At the moment, we are waiting to see if a reduction in the incidence of Enterococcus occurs.

We found a correlation between the increasing use of cefuroxime and the increased incidence of Enterococcus species in tissue samples. Multiple regression analysis showed that cefuroxime was the only one of the antibiotics tested that had a statistically significant effect on the increase in enterococci, which was not the case for dicloxacillin, gentamicin, and ciprofloxacin. The correlation between increased consumption of cephalosporins and increased incidence of enterococci applied both at the hospital level and at the departmental level, highlighting the selection pressure of high consumption of cephalosporins.

The rising incidence of enterococci in biopsies from orthopedic patients is worrying, because of the limited number of antibiotics available with sufficient activity against this species. Enterococci are resistant to cephalosporins, penicillinase-resistant penicillins, clinically achievable concentrations of gentamicin, clindamycin, and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, and they are relatively resistant to fluoroquinolones (Leclerq and Courvalin 2005). E. faecalis is susceptible to ampicillin, whereas the majority of E. faecium strains are ampicillin resistant.

Although most enterococci are susceptible to rifampicin, this agent is bacteriostatic against most strains of enterococci (Morris et al. 1993) and must be given in combination with another antibiotic to avoid development of resistance (Van der Auwera et al. 1983, Kadudugamuwa et al. 2004). Vancomycin generally has good in vitro activity against enterococci, but a rising incidence of vancomycin-resistant enterococci has been reported in several studies (Rice 2001, EARSS 2009). Vancomycin has relatively poor penetration of bone tissue (Graziani et al. 1988), and considering the minimal inhibitory concentrations of vancomycin against enterococci, the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profile of vancomycin for treatment of enterococcal bone infections is not favorable. Selection of enterococci in an orthopedic department is therefore very unfortunate because of the few therapeutic possibilities for treating deep orthopedic enterococcal infections, especially in patients with penicillin allergy.

We found an increasing proportion of E. faecium in enterococcal isolates, from 7% to 15%. This tendency has been reported by others (DANMAP 2009). E. faecium is resistant to all β-lactam antibiotics, and vancomycin and linezolide are often the only effective antibiotics available. It is well documented that a high consumption of carbapenems, e.g. meropenem, selects for E. faecium (Zhanel et al. 2007, Meyer et al. 2010). Allthough the carbapenem consumption at the orthopedic department was low, consumption of carbapenems in the entire hospital increased 4-fold in the period 2002–2010. This may have contributed to the increasing proportion of E. faecium isolates in the orthopedic department.

In summary, the high and increasing consumption of cefuroxime over several years in the orthopedic department at our hospital was correlated to a rising incidence of patients with enterococci in tissue samples. Selection of enterococci by treatment with cefuroxime is problematic, because they are resistant to penicillinase-resistant penicillins, clindamycin, and achievable levels of aminoglycosides. Rifampicin only has a bacteriostatic effect against most enterococci. These agents are important in the armamentarium for treatment of deep-seated orthopedic infections. A continuous local surveillance of species distribution, resistance rates, and antibiotic consumption is of prime importance for an optimal antibiotic strategy in orthopedic patients.

Acknowledgments

Data were extracted by MA. Statical analysis and interpretation of results was performed by JB. The final manuscript was written by PS and it was revised and approved by all the authors.

No competing interests declared.

References

  1. ATC/DDD Index http://www.whocc.no/atc_ddd_index/ 2011
  2. DANMAP www.danmap.org 2009
  3. EARSS European Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance System. http://www.rivn.nl/earss 2009
  4. Engesæter LB, Lie SA, Espehaug B, Furnes O, Vollset SE, Havelin LI. Antibiotic prophylaxis in total hip arthroplasty. Effects of antibiotic prophylaxis systemically and in bone cement on the revision rate of 22, 170 primary hip replacements followed 0-14 years in the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register. Acta Orthop Scand. 2003;74(6):644–52. doi: 10.1080/00016470310018135. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. ESAC European Surveillance of Antimicrobial Consumption. http://app.esac.ua.ac.be/public/ 2010
  6. Graziani AL, Lawson LA, Gibson GA, Steiberg MA, MacGregor RR. Vancomycin concentrations in infected and noninfected bone. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1988;32(9):1320–2. doi: 10.1128/aac.32.9.1320. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Hidron AI, Edwards JR, Horan TC, Sievert DM, Pollock DA, Fridkin Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2008;29(11):996–1011. doi: 10.1086/591861. SK. NHSN annual update: Antimicrobial-resistant pathogens associated with healthcare-associated infections: annual sum- mary of data reported to the National Healthcare Safety Network at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevetion 2006-2007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Kadudugamuwa JL, Sin LV, Yu J, Francis KP, Purchio TF, Contag PR. Noninvasive optical imaging method to evaluate postantibiotic effects on biofilm infection in vivo. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2004;48:2283–7. doi: 10.1128/AAC.48.6.2283-2287.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Leclercq R, Courvalin P. Levy B. White DG, Alekshun MN, McDermott P F. Frontiers in antimicrobial resistance: A tribute to Stuart. ASM Press; Washington, D.C.: 2005. Enterococcus. [Google Scholar]
  10. Meyer E, Schwab F, Schroeren-Boersch B, Gastmeier P. Dramatic increase of third-generation cephalosporin-resistant E. coli in German intensive care units: trends in antibiotic drug use and bacterial resistance, 2001. Critical Care. 2010;14:R113. doi: 10.1186/cc9062. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Morris AB, Brown RB, Sands M. Use of rifampin in nonstaphylococcal, nonmycobacterial disease. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1993;37:1–7. doi: 10.1128/aac.37.1.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Pallares R, Pujol M, Pena C, Ariza J, Martin R, Gudiol F. Cephalosporins as a risk factor for nosocomial Enterococcus faecalis bacteremia. Arch Intern Med. 1993;153:1581–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Rice LB. Emergence of vancomycin-resistant enterococci. Emerg Infect Dis. 2001;2:183–7. doi: 10.3201/eid0702.010205. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Van der Auwera P, Meunier-Carpentier F, Kastersky J. Clinical study of combination therapy with oxacillin and rifampin for staphylococcal infections. Rev Infect Dis (Suppl 3) 1983;5:S515–S522. doi: 10.1093/clinids/5.supplement_3.s515. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Zhanel GG, Wiebe R, Dilay L, Thomson K, Rubinstein E, Hoban DJ, Noreddin AM, Karlowsky JA. Comparative review of the carbapenems. Drug. 2007;67(7):1027–52. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200767070-00006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Acta Orthopaedica are provided here courtesy of Nordic Orthopaedic Federation

RESOURCES