Abstract
Discrimination between Streptococcus pneumoniae and its close relatives of the viridans group is a common difficulty in matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization–time of flight (MALDI-TOF) mass spectrometry-based identification. In the present study, the performances of the Vitek MS MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry system were assessed using 334 pneumococci, 166 other S. mitis group streptococci, 184 non-S. mitis group streptococci, and 19 related alpha- and nonhemolytic aerobic Gram-positive catalase-negative coccal isolates. Pneumococci had been identified by means of optochin susceptibility and bile solubility or serotyping, and other isolates mainly by use of RapidID32 Strep strips. In case of discordant or low-discrimination results, genotypic methods were used. The sensitivity of the Vitek MS for the identification of S. pneumoniae was 99.1%, since only three bile-insoluble isolates were misidentified as Streptococcus mitis/Streptococcus oralis. Conversely, two optochin-resistant pneumococci were correctly identified (specificity, 100%). Three Streptococcus pseudopneumoniae isolates were also correctly identified. Among nonpneumococcal isolates, 90.8% (n = 335) were correctly identified to the species or subspecies level and 2.4% (n = 9) at the group level. For the remaining 25 isolates, the Vitek MS proposed a bacterial species included in the list of possible species suggested by genotypic methods, except for 4 isolates which were not identified due to the absence of the species in the database. According to our study, the Vitek MS displays performance similar to that of the optochin susceptibility test for routine identification of pneumococcal isolates. Moreover, the Vitek MS is efficient for the identification of other viridans group streptococci and related isolates, provided that the species are included in the database.
INTRODUCTION
Streptococcus pneumoniae is responsible for upper respiratory tract infections (otitis and sinusitis) as well as severe diseases (pneumonia, bacteremia, and meningitis) associated with high morbidity and mortality rates (1). More than 90 capsular serotypes have been characterized, with an unequal distribution in systemic infections (2). The species S. pneumoniae belongs to the S. mitis group streptococci, which are part of the so-called viridans streptococci group, which also includes the S. salivarius, S. mutans, S. anginosus, and S. bovis groups (1, 3). In contrast to pneumococci, nonpneumococcal viridans group streptococci colonizing the upper respiratory tract are rarely responsible for systemic infections like endocarditis (1). Given these differences in clinical significance, accurate identification of S. pneumoniae is essential.
Both the biochemical systems and the commercial antigen detection tests available for pneumococcal identification (ID) are recognized as unsatisfactory (1, 4). The simplest and most reliable tests for S. pneumoniae ID in clinical laboratories are optochin susceptibility and/or bile solubility. However, optochin-resistant and bile-insoluble pneumococcal isolates and optochin-susceptible nonpneumococcal alpha-hemolytic streptococci have been reported (1, 4–9). Another pitfall of using optochin susceptibility testing is the differentiation of S. pseudopneumoniae isolates (10). Detection and determination of capsular polysaccharides of S. pneumoniae with type-specific antisera is a valuable second-line ID test but remains mainly an epidemiologic tool and entails the problem of untypeable pneumococci (1, 11, 12). To overcome problems in phenotypic pneumococcal ID, pneumococcus-specific PCRs targeting anonymous DNA fragments or genes encoding virulence factors like pneumolysin (plyA), autolysin (lytA), an oxidative stress resistance component (psaA), and capsular biosynthesis (cpsA) have been developed (13–20). Partial sequence analysis or specific nucleotide signatures of various housekeeping genes have been also proposed as an alternative approach for discriminating pneumococci and viridans streptococci (21–26). However, S. pneumoniae and other S. mitis group streptococci may share a high degree of DNA sequence identity due to the high frequency of genetic transformation of these bacterial species (27–29). In addition, these numerous molecular methods, which display variable specificity and reliability, remain inconvenient for routine diagnostic use.
Matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS)-based systems are increasingly replacing conventional phenotypic methods for routine ID of bacteria due to their fast, easy-to-use, cost-effective, and thus high-throughput performances (30–37). However, one of the main limitations reported for MALDI-TOF MS systems remains the lack of discrimination between S. pneumoniae and other closely related alpha-hemolytic streptococci (30, 33, 36–40). Conversely, two previous studies from Martiny and coworkers and our laboratory tested the Vitek MS (bioMérieux, France), a MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry-based ID system, and reported the apparent appropriate species ID of S. pneumoniae and other viridans group streptococci. Nonetheless, these studies were based on only a few isolates (34, 35). In the present study, we evaluated the performances of the Vitek MS system on a large and representative clinical collection of 334 pneumococci, 166 other S. mitis group streptococci, 184 non-S. mitis group streptococci, and 19 related alpha- and nonhemolytic aerobic Gram-positive catalase-negative coccal isolates.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Bacterial isolates.
A set of 334 nonredundant isolates of S. pneumoniae recovered in the Midi-Pyrénées region of France in 2009 as part of the regional epidemiological surveillance of S. pneumoniae (n = 300) or randomly chosen from our 2011 laboratory collection (n = 34) were analyzed (2). Pneumococcal strains originated from 193 blood cultures, 55 acute otitis media samples, 38 respiratory samples, 28 cerebrospinal fluids, 15 pleural effusions, two conjunctivitis samples, one joint fluid sample, one vaginal sample, and one skin lesion. Moreover, all nonredundant nonpneumococcal isolates recovered in our laboratory during the first 9 months of 2011 (n = 369, except 30 Streptococcus anginosus and 30 Streptococcus constellatus isolates randomly chosen), encompassing 166 other S. mitis group and 184 other non-S. mitis group viridans group streptococci, as well as 19 isolates belonging to six related genera were also included in this study. All isolates were cultured on 5% sheep blood Columbia agar (bioMérieux) for 18 h to 48 h at 35°C under a 5% CO2 atmosphere.
Optochin susceptibility test.
A 5-μg optochin disk (6-mm disks; MAST ID Optochin Discs, MAST, United Kingdom) was placed on sheep blood Columbia agar plates inoculated under 5% CO2 atmosphere, or ambient atmosphere when stated. Optochin susceptibility was defined as an inhibition zone of ≥14 mm.
Bile solubility test.
The bile solubility test was performed with the tube method, with preparation of bacterial suspensions in 1 ml of 0.9% NaCl equivalent to a McFarland 1.0 standard. A 0.5-ml portion of 2% deoxycholate was added to a 0.5-ml suspension of each isolate prepared in 0.9% NaCl and incubated at 35°C for 1 h. A positive test was indicated by visible clearing of the suspension. A negative control for each isolate was similarly performed with 0.5 ml of 0.9% NaCl added to a 0.5 ml suspension of each isolate prepared in 0.9% NaCl.
Serotyping method.
Pneumococcal capsular polysaccharide serotype was determined by agglutination with specific antisera (Statens Serum Institut, Copenhagen, Denmark).
Phenotypic identification systems.
Rapid ID32 Strep strips or the Vitek 2 system using the GP card (bioMérieux) were performed according to the manufacturer's instructions, including complementary tests if required. For the Rapid ID32 Strep strips, reading of the colorimetric reactions was achieved by the mini-API instrument (bioMérieux).
DNA extraction and molecular methods.
Template DNA was prepared by suspending a loopful of colonies in 200 μl of 0.1 M Tris-EDTA. Two microliters of 5 kU/ml of mutanolysin (Sigma) was added to 20 μl of the suspension, and the mixture was incubated at 56°C for 30 min, boiled for 10 min, and then centrifuged. Two microliters of the supernatant was used as the template in PCR mixtures. ply (18), lytA (14), psaA (15), and MFP (17) PCR assays (all specific to pneumococci), amplifying, respectively, a 209-bp, 101-bp, 838-bp, and 181-bp fragment, were performed as described previously. Partial sequencing of the recA gene (313 bp), encoding a recombinase subunit, of the sodA gene (435 bp), encoding the manganese-dependent superoxide dismutase, of the gyrB gene (458 bp), encoding the B subunit of DNA gyrase, and of the 3′-terminal part of the 16S rRNA gene (440 bp) was carried out using the primer pairs recA2F/recA5R, d1/d2, streptogyrBd/streptogyrBr, and MFP889/MFP890, respectively, as previously described (17, 26, 41). Searches for sequence homologies were carried out using the BIBI service combined with the GenBank database and the Basic Local Alignment Search Tool. 16S rRNA gene and recA gene sequence identities of ≥97.0% to the first proposed sequence of a classified species with a demarcation of 2% to the second classified species was considered to assign an ID to the species level (26, 42). Similarly, sequence identities of ≥94.0% for sodA and gyrB with a demarcation of 2% were arbitrarily used, as no criteria had yet been proposed.
MALDI-TOF MS identification.
Plate preparation, mass spectrum generation, and processing were performed with the Vitek MS system (bioMérieux) as previously described, using an Axima Assurance mass spectrometer with version 1.0.0 of the acquisition software and MS-ID database (34). According to the manufacturer's instructions, a confidence value from 60 to 99.9% with a single species proposed was considered a good ID. If a unique ID pattern was not recognized, a list of possible organisms was given corresponding to a low-discrimination result (LD) when a confidence value was >60% for each proposed species. When confidence values were <60%, the strain was determined to be outside the scope of the database and the result was recorded as “no ID.” In the case of warning messages generated by poor-quality spectra, LD results, and no-ID results, the deposits were read again, and when required, the isolates were tested again with a single deposit. In case of persistent LD results or poor-quality spectra, a protein extraction step was performed, as previously described (43).
Reference identifications and result management.
Presumptive pneumococcal isolates were tested for optochin susceptibility and bile solubility or serotype. S. pneumoniae isolates were defined as optochin susceptible (inhibition zone of ≥14 mm) under a CO2 atmosphere and bile soluble or typeable. Bile-insoluble or nontypeable isolates exhibiting an optochin inhibition zone of >6 mm and <14 mm under a CO2 atmosphere but of ≥14 mm under an ambient atmosphere in a complementary test were considered S. pseudopneumoniae (10). Other isolates were identified using the Rapid ID32 Strep system, except for S. bovis group and Helcococcus kunzii isolates, which were identified using the Vitek 2 system. S. mitis group isolates were confirmed to be optochin resistant.
In the case of discordant results between Vitek MS and conventional phenotypic methods, or low-discrimination results with conventional phenotypic methods, including discordant results between optochin susceptibility tests and bile solubility tests or serotypeability, or absence of ID (no ID) with the Vitek MS system, genetic IDs were performed, and the results were considered the reference ID. For management of discordant results, different partial gene sequencing was performed according to presumptive ID: recA sequencing, currently one of the most reliable genotypic tools for proper ID to species level of pneumococci and closest related species (26); 16S rRNA gene sequencing for catalase-negative nonstreptococcal isolates; and sodA sequencing for others. For informative purposes, partial gyrB gene sequencing was also performed in some cases with inconclusive IDs according to sodA sequencing. Moreover, bile solubility testing was carried out, along with ply-, lytA-, psaA-, and MFP-specific PCR assays for discrimination between S. pneumoniae and the most closely related species, for informative purposes.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Technical efficiency.
MALDI-TOF MS-based IDs were efficiently carried out with a unique deposit for 94.3% of the isolates (n = 663; Table 1), including 17 of 22 (77%) mucoid pneumococcal isolates. This technical efficiency for analysis of Gram-positive cocci with a single deposit without an extraction procedure is consistent with previous reports regarding the Vitek MS and Andromas MALDI-TOF MS-based systems in contrast to the Biotyper system (Bruker) (30, 31, 34, 35, 37, 39). A second deposit performed with 5.7% of the isolates (n = 40) resolved half of the IDs (Table 1). The six persistent no-ID results were considered true absences of ID. An extraction step followed by a unique deposit was performed for persistent LD results (n = 9) and poor-quality spectra (n = 5); the latter corresponded to mucoid pneumococci that account for 23% of all the mucoid pneumococcal isolates tested. The extraction step resolved all IDs but one, which remained an LD between Gemella morbillorum and Gemella haemolysans. Low-confidence values, LD results, and requirement of a second deposit or of an extraction step were not related to particular species, except that 23% of mucoid pneumococcal isolates needed an extraction step.
Table 1.
Result | No. of isolates (%) with result after: |
||
---|---|---|---|
Single deposit | Second deposit | Extraction step | |
Good ID | 663 (94.3)a | 20 (2.8) | 13 (1.9)b |
LD | 17 (2.4) | 9 (1.3) | 1 (0.1)c |
No ID | 13 (1.9) | 6 (0.9) | NDd |
Warning messages | 10 (1.4) | 5b (0.7) | 0 |
Total | 703 (100) | 40 (5.7) | 14 (2.0) |
Including 17 of 22 (77%) mucoid pneumococcal isolates.
Corresponding to or including 5 of 22 (23%) mucoid pneumococcal isolates.
Corresponding to an LD result between Gemella morbillorum and Gemella hemolysans.
ND, not done (after two deposits with a no-ID result, the isolates were considered outside the scope of the database).
Inconsistent results occurred for three isolates, identified as coagulase-negative staphylococci or β-hemolytic Streptococcus. Performing a second deposit allowed us to successfully identify two isolates, the other one belonging to a species that was outside the scope of the database. These outright inconsistent IDs emphasize the fact that bacteriological technical expertise remains essential to avoid major misidentifications.
S. pneumoniae identification performances.
A large diversity of pneumococci was assessed in this study, which includes 267 isolates belonging to 22 different serogroups. The sensitivity of the Vitek MS system for the ID of S. pneumoniae was 99.1%, with three of the 334 isolates being misidentified as Streptococcus mitis/oralis (Table 2) according to partial recA gene sequencing analysis. These three misidentified S. pneumoniae were isolated from respiratory samples and are atypical pneumococci, since all three isolates were bile insoluble, and two of them were negative for MFP and psaA amplifications. These PCRs have been recently reported to be among the most reliable species-specific PCRs to appropriately discriminate S. pneumoniae and the most closely related species, like S. pseudopneumoniae (13, 17). Conversely, the specificity of the Vitek MS system for S. pneumoniae ID was 100% (Table 2), with two optochin-resistant, bile-soluble, and typeable pneumococci correctly identified. One of these two isolates, originating from a blood culture, was psaA and lytA negative. In contrast to previous reports related to other MALDI-TOF systems (30, 33, 36–40), the Vitek MS system allows good discrimination between the S. pneumoniae species and other viridans streptococcal species. This is probably linked to its particular algorithm, which may efficiently detect the specific mass/charge peak profiles of S. pneumoniae and the most closely related species, as recently highlighted by Werno and coworkers (44).
Table 2.
Reference ID (no. of isolates)a | Vitek MS ID | Optochin CO2b | BS testc | Pneumococcal capsule identification | PCR result |
No. of isolates with sequencing |
No. of isolates (%) with Vitek MS |
||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
psaA | MFP | ply | lytA | recA | sodA | 16S rRNA | Correct ID | Incorrect ID | Unresolved ID | No ID | |||||
Pneumococcal isolates (334) | 331 (99.1) | 3 (0.9) | |||||||||||||
S. pneumoniae (292) | S. pneumoniae | S | ND | Yes | 292 | ||||||||||
S. pneumoniae (37) | S. pneumoniae | S | Soluble | No or NDd | 37 | ||||||||||
S. pneumoniae (1) | S. pneumoniae | R (R) | Soluble | 3 | + | + | + | + | 1 | 1 | |||||
S. pneumoniae (1) | S. pneumoniae | R (R) | Soluble | 23F | − | + | + | − | 1 | 1 | |||||
S. pneumoniae (1) | S. mitis/S. oralis | S (S) | Not soluble | 23 | + | + | + | + | 1 | 1 | |||||
S. pneumoniae (1) | S. mitis/S. oralis | S (S) | Not soluble | 37 | − | − | + | + | 1 | 1 | |||||
S. pneumoniae (1) | S. mitis/S. oralis | S (S) | Not soluble | ND | − | − | + | + | 1 | 1 | |||||
Nonpneumococcal isolates (369) | 335 (90.8) | 9 (2.4) | 21 (5.7) | 4 (1.1) | |||||||||||
Other mitis group streptococci (166) | 155 (93.4) | 5 (3) | 5 (3) | 1 (0.6) | |||||||||||
S. pseudopneumoniae (1) | S. pseudopneumoniae | R (S) | Not soluble | No | − | ND | + | + | 1 | 1 | |||||
S. pseudopneumoniae (1) | S. pseudopneumoniae | R (S) | Not soluble | ND | − | ND | + | + | 1 | 1 | |||||
S. pseudopneumoniae (1) | S. pseudopneumoniae | R (S) | Not soluble | ND | − | ND | − | − | 1 | 1 | |||||
S. mitis/S. oralis (126)e | S. mitis/S. oralis | R | 126 | ||||||||||||
S. gordonii (7) | S. gordonii | R | 4 | 7 | |||||||||||
S. cristatus (1) | S. cristatus | R | 1 | 1 | |||||||||||
S. sanguinis (7) | S. sanguinis | R | 3 | 7 | |||||||||||
S. parasanguinis (11) | S. parasanguinis | R | 1 | 11 | |||||||||||
S. australis (3)f | S. parasanguinis | R | 3 | 3 | |||||||||||
S. australis (2)f | S. sanguinis | R | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
S. massiliensis (1)f | No ID | R | 1 | 1 | |||||||||||
S. oralis/S. parasanguinis (1) | S. parasanguinis | R | 1 | 1 | |||||||||||
S. mitis group (4) | 2 S. mitis/oralis, 1 S. parasanguinis, 1 no ID | R | Not soluble | 4 | 4 | ||||||||||
Non-mitis group streptococci (184) | 166 (90.2) | 4 (2.2) | 14 (7.6) | ||||||||||||
S. salivarius group (39) | 39 (100) | ||||||||||||||
S. salivarius subsp. salivarius (35) | S. salivarius | 2 | 35 | ||||||||||||
S. vestibularis (4) | S. vestibularis | 3 | 4 | ||||||||||||
S. mutans group (2) | 2 (100) | ||||||||||||||
S. mutans (2) | S. mutans | 2 | |||||||||||||
S. anginosus group (111) | 101 (91) | 1 (0.9) | 9 (8.1) | ||||||||||||
S. constellatus (37) | S. constellatus | 2 | 37 | ||||||||||||
S. anginosus (48) | S. anginosus | 5 | 48 | ||||||||||||
S. constellatus/S. anginosus (5) | S. constellatus | 5 | 5 | ||||||||||||
S. constellatus/S. anginosus (4) | S. anginosus | 4 | 4 | ||||||||||||
S. anginosus (1) | S. constellatus | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||||
S. intermedius (16) | S. intermedius | 16 | |||||||||||||
S. bovis group (32) | 24 (75) | 3 (9.4) | 5 (15.6) | ||||||||||||
S. gallolyticus subsp. gallolyticus (4) | S. gallolyticus subsp. gallolyticus | 4 | |||||||||||||
S. gallolyticus subsp. pasteurianus (18) | S. gallolyticus subsp. pasteurianus | 18 | |||||||||||||
S. gallolyticus subsp. pasteurianus (2) | S. gallolyticus subsp. gallolyticus | 2 | 2 | ||||||||||||
S. bovis (1) | S. bovis | 1 | |||||||||||||
S. lutetiensis/S. bovis/S. equinus (1) | S. bovis | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||||
S. lutetiensis/S. bovis/S. equinus (4) | S lutetiensis | 4 | 4 | ||||||||||||
S. lutetiensis/S. bovis/S. equinus (1) | S. gallolyticus subsp. gallolyticus | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||||
S. infantarius subsp. infantarius (1) | S. infantarius subsp. infantarius | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||||
Related genera (19) | 14 (73.7) | 2 (10.5) | 3 (15.8) | ||||||||||||
Abiotrophia defectiva (1) | A. defectiva | 1 | |||||||||||||
Granulicatella adiacens (1) | G. adiacens | 1 | |||||||||||||
“Granulicatella para-adiacens”f/G. adiacens/G. elegans (1) | No ID | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||||
Gemella morbillorum/G. haemolysans (1) | G. morbillorum/G hemolysans | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||||
Helcococcus kunzii (2) | Helcococcus kunzii | 2 | |||||||||||||
Facklamia tabacinasalis (1)f | No ID | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||||
Facklamia ignava (1)f | No ID | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||||
Aerococcus viridans (2) | A. viridans | 2 | |||||||||||||
Aerococcus urinae (8) | A. urinae | 8 | |||||||||||||
Aerococcus sanguinicola (1)f | No ID | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||||
Total (703) | 8 | 51 | 5 | 666 (94.7) | 12 (1.7) | 21 (3) | 4 (0.6) |
BS test, desoxycholate solubility test.
Reference identifications were obtained using Rapid ID32 Strep strips or the VITEK2 system by default, or with gene sequencing when stated.
S, susceptible; R, resistant. Results were obtained under an atmopshere of increased CO2; parentheses indicate a result obtained under an ambient atmosphere.
Including three polyagglutinable isolates and 12 nonagglutinable isolates. ND, not determined.
Including 52 S. oralis, 68 S. mitis, and 6 S. mitis/S. oralis isolates.
Species absent from the Vitek MS database.
Of note, the good performances of the Vitek MS for the ID of S. pneumoniae were obtained from pure culture on agar media. Viridans group streptococci form minuscule to small colonies, frequently requiring the use of more than one colony to perform the deposit of intact whole bacteria on the MALDI-TOF MS target. Since viridans group streptococci can have similar colony morphologies, performing a deposit with more than one colony to detect S. pneumoniae isolates directly from a possibly polymicrobial culture, like those frequently originated from respiratory samples, remains very hazardous.
Nonpneumococcal identification performances.
Among nonpneumococcal isolates, 90.8% (n = 335) were correctly identified to the species or subspecies level (Table 2). Isolated from respiratory samples without any other pathogenic bacteria recovered, all three S. pseudopneumoniae isolates were correctly identified. The three isolates were psaA negative, and two isolates were ply positive, which is consistent with the reported specificity of the psaA PCR for S. pneumoniae ID and the frequent ply-positive PCRs among S. pseudopneumoniae isolates (10, 13, 45).
Four nonpneumococcal isolates (1.1%) were not identified due to the absence of these species in the database (Streptococcus massiliensis, Facklamia tabacinasalis, Facklamia ignava, and Aerococcus sanguinicola) (Table 2). The sodA gene sequence of the S. massiliensis isolate displayed only 94.2% identity with the sequence of the reference strain 4401825, which harbors a 27-bp duplication. In contrast, the partial gyrB sequence showed 100% identity with the one of the reference strain (46). The partial sodA and gyrB sequences of this S. massiliensis isolate from peritoneal fluid had been deposited in the EMBL Nucleotide Sequence Database into the accession numbers HF677578 and HF677579, respectively.
Nine nonpneumococcal isolates (2.4%) were correctly identified to the group level but misidentified at the species or subspecies level, including five S. mitis group, one S. anginosus group, and three S. bovis group isolates. The five S. mitis group isolates were five Streptococcus australis isolates identified as Streptococcus parasanguinis or Streptococcus sanguinis (Table 2). These S. australis misidentifications may be due to the close relationships of S. australis with S. sanguinis and S. parasanguinis (46), together with the absence of S. australis in the database of the Vitek MS.
Reference IDs using genotypic methods were obtained only at the group level for 5.7% (n = 21) of nonpneumococcal isolates, including five S. mitis group, nine S. anginosus group, five S. bovis group, and two related-genus isolates. The Vitek MS proposed a bacterial species included in the list of possible species suggested by sodA or 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis for 19 isolates and no ID for two isolates (Table 2). The latter were an S. mitis group isolate for which the sodA gene sequence was similar to S. mitis group species absent from the Vitek MS database (S. australis, S. infantis, and S. peroris), and a Granulicatella isolate for which partial 16S rRNA gene sequencing suggested species present in the Vitek MS database (G. adiacens and G. elegans) or absent in the Vitek MS database (“Granulicatella para-adiacens”).
In the S. anginosus group, considerable genetic similarity has been previously reported, which adds to the complexity of defining species, despite an apparent biochemical heterogeneity (1, 47, 48). By sequencing four different housekeeping genes, Glazunova and coworkers showed that some S. anginosus group isolates were identified as either S. anginosus or S. constellatus, depending on which gene sequence was analyzed (47). For informative purpose, gyrB gene sequencing was performed for two randomly chosen isolates. The gyrB gene sequence confirmed the identification obtained with the MALDI-TOF MS (S. constellatus) for only one of them.
Hinse and coworkers recently reported the reliability of MALDI-TOF MS technology for the ID of almost all members of the S. bovis group streptococci in comparison to sodA gene sequencing analysis (49). The authors also highlighted the fact that in this group, which has undergone many taxonomic changes over the last decade (50, 51), some strains were mislabeled in collection databases, or that species or subspecies had been assigned in nucleotide databases prior to the latest taxonomic revision of this species complex. Accordingly, IDs proposed by the Vitek MS for the eight isolates that were misidentified or had unresolved IDs could be correct (Table 2), unless the Vitek MS database was constructed with some mislabeled strains.
In conclusion, according to our study, the Vitek MS displays performances similar to that of the optochin susceptibility test for routine ID of pneumococcal isolates. Provided that the species are included in the database, this system is an efficient method for the ID of nonpneumococcal viridans streptococci to the group level and in most cases to the species level.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We thank the outstanding clinical bacteriology laboratory technologists at the Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse, France, for their help in collecting and analyzing isolates of this study. We also thank the biologists from the Observatoire Régional du Pneumocoque Midi-Pyrénées 2009 for providing most of the S. pneumoniae isolates and the Centre National de Référence des Pneumocoques, headed by Emmanuelle Varon, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, AP-HP, Paris, France, for serotyping of most pneumococcal isolates.
Footnotes
Published ahead of print 10 April 2013
REFERENCES
- 1. Spellerberg B, Brandt C. 2011. Streptococcus, p 331–349 In Versalovic J, Carroll KC, Funke G, Jorgensen JH, Landry ML, Warnock DW. (ed), Manual of clinical microbiology, 10th ed ASM Press, Washington, DC [Google Scholar]
- 2. Kempf M, Gravet A, Observatoires regionaux du pneumocoque 2012. Regional pneumococcal observatories: antibiotic susceptibility and serotypes of Streptococcus pneumoniae isolated in France in 2009. Bulletin Epidemiol. Hebd. 2012:428–431 [Google Scholar]
- 3. Kawamura Y, Hou XG, Sultana F, Miura H, Ezaki T. 1995. Determination of 16S rRNA sequences of Streptococcus mitis and Streptococcus gordonii and phylogenetic relationships among members of the genus Streptococcus. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 45:406–408 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Kellogg JA, Bankert DA, Elder CJ, Gibbs JL, Smith MC. 2001. Identification of Streptococcus pneumoniae revisited. J. Clin. Microbiol. 39:3373–3375 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Balsalobre L, Hernandez-Madrid A, Llull D, Martin-Galiano AJ, Garcia E, Fenoll A, de la Campa AG. 2006. Molecular characterization of disease-associated streptococci of the mitis group that are optochin susceptible. J. Clin. Microbiol. 44:4163–4171 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Kontiainen S, Sivonen A. 1987. Optochin resistance in Streptococcus pneumoniae strains isolated from blood and middle ear fluid. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. 6:422–424 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Munoz R, Fenoll A, Vicioso D, Casal J. 1990. Optochin-resistant variants of Streptococcus pneumoniae. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 13:63–66 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Nunes S, Sa-Leao R, de Lencastre H. 2008. Optochin resistance among Streptococcus pneumoniae strains colonizing healthy children in Portugal. J. Clin. Microbiol. 46:321–324 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Pikis A, Campos JM, Rodriguez WJ, Keith JM. 2001. Optochin resistance in Streptococcus pneumoniae: mechanism, significance, and clinical implications. J. Infect. Dis. 184:582–590 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Arbique JC, Poyart C, Trieu-Cuot P, Quesne G, Carvalho Mda G, Steigerwalt AG, Morey RE, Jackson D, Davidson RJ, Facklam RR. 2004. Accuracy of phenotypic and genotypic testing for identification of Streptococcus pneumoniae and description of Streptococcus pseudopneumoniae sp. nov. J. Clin. Microbiol. 42:4686–4696 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Ing J, Mason EO, Kaplan SL, Lamberth LB, Revell PA, Luna RA, Hulten KG. 2012. Characterization of nontypeable and atypical Streptococcus pneumoniae pediatric isolates from 1994 to 2010. J. Clin. Microbiol. 50:1326–1330 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Pease AA, Douglas CW, Spencer RC. 1986. Identifying non-capsulate strains of Streptococcus pneumoniae isolated from eyes. J. Clin. Pathol. 39:871–875 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. El Aila NA, Emler S, Kaijalainen T, De Baere T, Saerens B, Alkan E, Deschaght P, Verhelst R, Vaneechoutte M. 2010. The development of a 16S rRNA gene based PCR for the identification of Streptococcus pneumoniae and comparison with four other species specific PCR assays. BMC Infect. Dis. 10:104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. McAvin JC, Reilly PA, Roudabush RM, Barnes WJ, Salmen A, Jackson GW, Beninga KK, Astorga A, McCleskey FK, Huff WB, Niemeyer D, Lohman KL. 2001. Sensitive and specific method for rapid identification of Streptococcus pneumoniae using real-time fluorescence PCR. J. Clin. Microbiol. 39:3446–3451 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Morrison KE, Lake D, Crook J, Carlone GM, Ades E, Facklam R, Sampson JS. 2000. Confirmation of psaA in all 90 serotypes of Streptococcus pneumoniae by PCR and potential of this assay for identification and diagnosis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 38:434–437 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Park HK, Lee SJ, Yoon JW, Shin JW, Shin HS, Kook JK, Myung SC, Kim W. 2010. Identification of the cpsA gene as a specific marker for the discrimination of Streptococcus pneumoniae from viridans group streptococci. J. Med. Microbiol. 59:1146–1152 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Prere MF, Fayet OA. 2011. A specific polymerase chain reaction test for the identification of Streptococcus pneumoniae. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 70:45–53 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Rintamaki S, Saukkoriipi A, Salo P, Takala A, Leinonen M. 2002. Detection of Streptococcus pneumoniae DNA by using polymerase chain reaction and microwell hybridization with Europium-labelled probes. J. Microbiol. Methods 50:313–318 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Suzuki N, Seki M, Nakano Y, Kiyoura Y, Maeno M, Yamashita Y. 2005. Discrimination of Streptococcus pneumoniae from viridans group streptococci by genomic subtractive hybridization. J. Clin. Microbiol. 43:4528–4534 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Suzuki N, Yuyama M, Maeda S, Ogawa H, Mashiko K, Kiyoura Y. 2006. Genotypic identification of presumptive Streptococcus pneumoniae by PCR using four genes highly specific for S. pneumoniae. J. Med. Microbiol. 55:709–714 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Chen CC, Teng LJ, Chang TC. 2004. Identification of clinically relevant viridans group streptococci by sequence analysis of the 16S-23S ribosomal DNA spacer region. J. Clin. Microbiol. 42:2651–2657 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Drancourt M, Roux V, Fournier PE, Raoult D. 2004. rpoB gene sequence-based identification of aerobic Gram-positive cocci of the genera Streptococcus, Enterococcus, Gemella, Abiotrophia, and Granulicatella. J. Clin. Microbiol. 42:497–504 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Maeda Y, Goldsmith CE, Coulter WA, Mason C, Dooley JS, Lowery CJ, Millar BC, Moore JE. 2011. Comparison of five gene loci (rnpB, 16S rRNA, 16S-23S rRNA, sodA and dnaJ) to aid the molecular identification of viridans-group streptococci and pneumococci. Br. J. Biomed. Sci. 68:190–196 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Park HK, Yoon JW, Shin JW, Kim JY, Kim W. 2010. rpoA is a useful gene for identification and classification of Streptococcus pneumoniae from the closely related viridans group streptococci. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 305:58–64 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Scholz CF, Poulsen K, Kilian M. 2012. Novel molecular method for identification of Streptococcus pneumoniae applicable to clinical microbiology and 16S rRNA sequence-based microbiome studies. J. Clin. Microbiol. 50:1968–1973 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Zbinden A, Kohler N, Bloemberg GV. 2011. recA-based PCR assay for accurate differentiation of Streptococcus pneumoniae from other viridans streptococci. J. Clin. Microbiol. 49:523–527 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Croucher NJ, Harris SR, Fraser C, Quail MA, Burton J, van der Linden M, McGee L, von Gottberg A, Song JH, Ko KS, Pichon B, Baker S, Parry CM, Lambertsen LM, Shahinas D, Pillai DR, Mitchell TJ, Dougan G, Tomasz A, Klugman KP, Parkhill J, Hanage WP, Bentley SD. 2011. Rapid pneumococcal evolution in response to clinical interventions. Science 331:430–434 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Henriques-Normark B, Blomberg C, Dagerhamn J, Battig P, Normark S. 2008. The rise and fall of bacterial clones: Streptococcus pneumoniae. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 6:827–837 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Kilian M, Poulsen K, Blomqvist T, Havarstein LS, Bek-Thomsen M, Tettelin H, Sorensen UB. 2008. Evolution of Streptococcus pneumoniae and its close commensal relatives. PLoS One 3:e2683 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0002683 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Bille E, Dauphin B, Leto J, Bougnoux ME, Beretti JL, Lotz A, Suarez S, Meyer J, Join-Lambert O, Descamps P, Grall N, Mory F, Dubreuil L, Berche P, Nassif X, Ferroni A. 2011. MALDI-TOF MS Andromas strategy for the routine identification of bacteria, mycobacteria, yeasts, Aspergillus spp. and positive blood cultures. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 18:1117–1125 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Bizzini A, Durussel C, Bille J, Greub G, Prod'hom G. 2010. Performance of matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry for identification of bacterial strains routinely isolated in a clinical microbiology laboratory. J. Clin. Microbiol. 48:1549–1554 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Blondiaux N, Gaillot O, Courcol RJ. 2010. MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry to identify clinical bacterial isolates: evaluation in a teaching hospital in Lille. Pathol. Biol. (Paris) 58:55–57 (In French.) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Cherkaoui A, Hibbs J, Emonet S, Tangomo M, Girard M, Francois P, Schrenzel J. 2010. Comparison of two matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry methods with conventional phenotypic identification for routine identification of bacteria to the species level. J. Clin. Microbiol. 48:1169–1175 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Dubois D, Grare M, Prere MF, Segonds C, Marty N, Oswald E. 2012. Performances of the Vitek MS matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry system for rapid identification of bacteria in routine clinical microbiology. J. Clin. Microbiol. 50:2568–2576 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Martiny D, Busson L, Wybo I, El Haj RA, Dediste A, Vandenberg O. 2012. Comparison of the Microflex LT and Vitek MS systems for routine identification of bacteria by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry. J. Clin. Microbiol. 50:1313–1325 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Seng P, Drancourt M, Gouriet F, La Scola B, Fournier PE, Rolain JM, Raoult D. 2009. Ongoing revolution in bacteriology: routine identification of bacteria by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Clin. Infect. Dis. 49:543–551 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. van Veen SQ, Claas EC, Kuijper EJ. 2010. High-throughput identification of bacteria and yeast by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry in conventional medical microbiology laboratories. J. Clin. Microbiol. 48:900–907 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Eigner U, Holfelder M, Oberdorfer K, Betz-Wild U, Bertsch D, Fahr AM. 2009. Performance of a matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time-of-flight mass spectrometry system for the identification of bacterial isolates in the clinical routine laboratory. Clin. Lab. 55:289–296 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Alatoom AA, Cunningham SA, Ihde SM, Mandrekar J, Patel R. 2011. Comparison of direct colony method versus extraction method for identification of gram-positive cocci by use of Bruker Biotyper matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry. J. Clin. Microbiol. 49:2868–2873 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Benagli C, Rossi V, Dolina M, Tonolla M, Petrini O. 2011. Matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry for the identification of clinically relevant bacteria. PLoS One 6:e16424 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0016424 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Poyart C, Quesne G, Coulon S, Berche P, Trieu-Cuot P. 1998. Identification of streptococci to species level by sequencing the gene encoding the manganese-dependent superoxide dismutase. J. Clin. Microbiol. 36:41–47 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Stackebrandt E, Frederiksen W, Garrity GM, Grimont PA, Kampfer P, Maiden MC, Nesme X, Rossello-Mora R, Swings J, Truper HG, Vauterin L, Ward AC, Whitman WB. 2002. Report of the ad hoc committee for the re-evaluation of the species definition in bacteriology. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 52:1043–1047 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Dubois D, Leyssene D, Chacornac JP, Kostrzewa M, Schmit PO, Talon R, Bonnet R, Delmas J. 2010. Identification of a variety of Staphylococcus species by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry. J. Clin. Microbiol. 48:941–945 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Werno AM, Christner M, Anderson TP, Murdoch DR. 2012. Differentiation of Streptococcus pneumoniae from nonpneumococcal streptococci of the Streptococcus mitis group by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry. J. Clin. Microbiol. 50:2863–2867 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Keith ER, Podmore RG, Anderson TP, Murdoch DR. 2006. Characteristics of Streptococcus pseudopneumoniae isolated from purulent sputum samples. J. Clin. Microbiol. 44:923–927 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Glazunova OO, Raoult D, Roux V. 2009. Partial sequence comparison of the rpoB, sodA, groEL and gyrB genes within the genus Streptococcus. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 59:2317–2322 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Glazunova OO, Raoult D, Roux V. 2010. Partial recN gene sequencing: a new tool for identification and phylogeny within the genus Streptococcus. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 60:2140–2148 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Whiley RA, Beighton D. 1991. Emended descriptions and recognition of Streptococcus constellatus, Streptococcus intermedius, and Streptococcus anginosus as distinct species. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 41:1–5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Hinse D, Vollmer T, Erhard M, Welker M, Moore ER, Kleesiek K, Dreier J. 2011. Differentiation of species of the Streptococcus bovis/equinus-complex by MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry in comparison to sodA sequence analyses. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 34:52–57 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Schlegel L, Grimont F, Collins MD, Regnault B, Grimont PA, Bouvet A. 2000. Streptococcus infantarius sp. nov., Streptococcus infantarius subsp. infantarius subsp. nov. and Streptococcus infantarius subsp. coli subsp. nov., isolated from humans and food. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 50:1425–1434 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Schlegel L, Grimont F, Ageron E, Grimont PA, Bouvet A. 2003. Reappraisal of the taxonomy of the Streptococcus bovis/Streptococcus equinus complex and related species: description of Streptococcus gallolyticus subsp. gallolyticus subsp. nov., S. gallolyticus subsp. macedonicus subsp. nov. and S. gallolyticus subsp. pasteurianus subsp. nov. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 53:631–645 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]