Skip to main content
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy logoLink to Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
. 2013 Jun;57(6):2834–2837. doi: 10.1128/AAC.02542-12

Efficacy of Nitazoxanide against Clinical Isolates of Mycobacterium tuberculosis

Kristina Shigyo a,b, Oksana Ocheretina a, Yves Mary Merveille c, Warren D Johnson a, Jean William Pape a,c, Carl F Nathan b, Daniel W Fitzgerald a,
PMCID: PMC3716123  PMID: 23507275

Abstract

Nitazoxanide (NTZ) has bactericidal activity against the H37Rv laboratory strain of Mycobacterium tuberculosis with a MIC of 16 μg/ml. However, its efficacy against clinical isolates of M. tuberculosis has not been determined. We found that NTZ's MIC against 50 clinical isolates ranged from 12 to 28 μg/ml with a median of 16 μg/ml and was unaffected by resistance to first- or second-line antituberculosis drugs or a diversity of spoligotypes.

TEXT

Treatment of drug-sensitive tuberculosis (TB) currently involves treatment with four drugs for 2 months and two drugs for another 4 months. Failure to adhere to this regimen or ingestion of diluted or counterfeit drugs may lead to emergence of drug-resistant TB. TB most often occurs in resource-poor settings that lack the health care system necessary to ensure adherence (1, 2). HIV infection increases the risk for developing active TB and is fueling the TB epidemic, particularly in places where both infections are prevalent. TB remains one of the leading causes of death in AIDS patients, and treatment of TB in such patients requires longer duration of therapy and is associated with a high recurrence rate.

Moreover, primary drug-resistant TB is rarely recognized as such when patients first present, owing to the lack of facilities for drug sensitivity testing (DST). As a consequence, multidrug-resistant (MDR) TB, defined as Mycobacterium tuberculosis disease that is resistant to the first-line drugs isoniazid and rifampin, is increasing in prevalence (36). Also increasing is extensively drug-resistant (XDR) TB caused by strains of M. tuberculosis that are also resistant to the second-line quinolones and injectable aminoglycoside and peptide antibiotics (7, 8). The discovery of new TB drugs is therefore a public health priority (9, 10).

Nitazoxanide (NTZ) (Alina; Romark Laboratories) is a widely used anti-infective that is remarkable for both the breadth of its clinical indications and its record of safety (11, 12). NTZ, a synthetic nitrothiazolyl salicylamide, is deacetylated in the gastrointestinal tract to the active metabolite tizoxanide (13, 14). NTZ is approved for the treatment of giardiasis and cryptosporidiosis (15, 16) and has broad-spectrum activity against other protozoa, helminths, and the anaerobic or microaerophilic bacteria Clostridium difficile and Helicobacter pylori, as well as showing effectiveness in infections caused by rotavirus and hepatitis C (14, 1722).

It was recently reported that NTZ and tizoxanide killed the H37Rv reference strain of M. tuberculosis in vitro, both when M. tuberculosis was replicating and when its replication was blocked by physiologic conditions of acidity and nitrosative stress (23). The ability of a given compound to kill both replicating and nonreplicating M. tuberculosis is uncommon (24). The mycobactericidal activity of NTZ was both dose and time dependent but minimally inoculum dependent (23). No resistant mutants were identified in multiple experiments that implied a frequency of resistance of <10−13, suggesting that nitazoxanide may have multiple targets (23). The aim of the present study was to evaluate the MIC of NTZ against clinical isolates of M. tuberculosis with various drug resistance patterns.

Sputum specimens for M. tuberculosis culture were collected at Le Groupe Haïtien d'Etude du Sarcome de Kaposi et des Infections Opportunistes (GHESKIO) in Port-au-Prince, Haiti, stored at 4°C, and processed within 3 days. Samples were decontaminated with N-acetyl cysteine-sodium hydroxide, washed, resuspended, cultured in Bactec MGIT growth indicator tubes according to the manufacturer's instructions (Becton Dickenson), and incubated in a Bactec 960 MGIT device. Aliquots were frozen at −70°C in 30% glycerol.

Conventional DSTs were performed on positive cultures using the Bactec MGIT 960 SIRE kit with 1.0 μg/ml streptomycin, 0.1 μg/ml isoniazid, 1.0 μg/ml rifampin, and 5.0 μg/ml ethambutol. Pyrazinamide (PZA) susceptibility testing was performed using Bactec MGIT 960 PZA kits at pH 6.0 with 100 μg/ml pyrazinamide. Ofloxacin susceptibility testing was performed using a concentration of 2.0 μg/ml with a proportion method on 7H10 agar as recommended by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (25).

Spoligotyping was performed using standard PCR-based methods determining variations in the presence or absence of 43 direct-repeat interspacers (26). Spoligotyping was performed using a Luminex platform for high-throughput detection of multiple simultaneous DNA sequences. The Luminex system incorporates microspheres containing two fluorochromes, with oligonucleotide probes attached to each microsphere as previously described (27). Results were referenced against the SITVITWEB international database to assign spoligotype number and lineage (28).

The present study used 50 typed isolates, including 20 pan-sensitive specimens, 3 specimens resistant to isoniazid but sensitive to other first-line drugs, and 27 isolates resistant to both isoniazid and rifampin, with various resistances to streptomycin (21), ethambutol (22), and pyrazinamide (14). Two of the MDR specimens were also resistant to ofloxacin.

In the GHESKIO biosafety level 3 laboratory, M. tuberculosis isolates were grown in Bactec MGIT 960 as described above. Cultures were vortexed for 10 s and subcultured in Difco Middlebrook 7H9 broth supplemented with oleic acid-albumin-dextrose-catalase (OADC) and tyloxapol to an optical density at 580 nm (OD580) of 0.01 and then subcultured to an OD580 of 0.6 to 0.8. Cultures were diluted in 7H9/OADC/tyloxapol to an OD580 of 0.01, and 200 μl was added to 96-well plates whose outer wells were filled with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS)/tyloxapol to minimize evaporative losses. NTZ (2 μl) was prediluted in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) to appropriate concentrations and added to produce final concentrations of 0 to 36 μg/ml in 4-μg/ml increments (final DMSO concentration ≤ 1%). Assays were performed in triplicate. After 10 days of incubation at 37°C, MICs were determined by visual inspection. Each set of experiments included a MIC determination for rifampin on a pansensitive strain as a positive control.

MICs for NTZ ranged from 12 to 28 μg/ml with a median of 16 μg/ml and a mean of 17.6 μg/ml (Table 1). There was no significant difference in MICs between the drug-sensitive strains and the drug-resistant strains (P = 0.22; Student's t test). The MICs for the 20 pansensitive isolates ranged from 12 to 28 μg/ml with a median of 18 μg/ml and a mean of 17.9 μg/ml. The MICs for the 30 drug-resistant isolates ranged from 12 to 28 μg/ml with a median of 16 μg/ml and a mean of 17.5 μg/ml.

Table 1.

Nitazoxanide MICs on 50 clinical isolates with multiple drug resistance patterns and spoligotypesa

Specimen no. Spoligotype M. tuberculosis lineage Drug resistance Mean NTZ MIC (μg/ml)
1 42 LAM None 16
2 4 ND None 17.3
3 ND ND None 20
4 5 T None 24
5 42 LAM None 18.7
6 42 LAM None 16
7 70 X None 16
8 ND ND None 20
9 163 LAM None 16
10 106 ND None 20
11 51 T None 20
12 50 Haarlem None 20
13 2 Haarlem None 16
14 51 T None 20
15 168 Haarlem None 28
16 17 LAM None 14.7
17 168 Haarlem None 20
18 42 LAM None 12
19 34 S None 12
20 50 Haarlem None 12
21 53 T H 26.7
22 53 T H 18.7
23 183 Haarlem H 24
24 909 ND H, R 16
25 20 LAM H, R 20
26 53 T H, R, E 17.3
27 20 LAM H, R, E 20
28 17 LAM H, R, E 16
29 390 Haarlem H, R, S 16
30 137 X H, R, E, S 16
31 137 X H, R, E, S 14.7
32 20 LAM H, R, E, S 16
33 50 Haarlem H, R, E, S 20
34 50 Haarlem H, R, E, S 14.7
35 2281 LAM H, R, E, S 12
36 2 Haarlem H, R, S, Z 20
37 34 S H, R, E, Z 16
38 119 X H, R, S, Z 20
39 50 Haarlem H, R, E, S, Z 16
40 93 LAM H, R, E, S, Z 16
41 34 S H, R, E, S, Z 12
42 455 T H, R, E, S, Z 21.3
43 93 LAM H, R, E, S, Z 16
44 47 Haarlem H, R, E, S, Z 13.3
45 455 T H, R, E, S, Z 24
46 93 LAM H, R, E, S, Z 17.3
47 50 Haarlem H, R, E, S, Z 16
48 17 LAM H, R, E, S, Z 16
49 93 LAM H, R, E, S, Ofx 16
50 93 LAM H, R, E, S, Z, Ofx 16
a

The MICs of nitazoxanide (NTZ) against 20 pansensitive and 30 drug-resistant clinical isolates of Mycobacterium tuberculosis are shown. Resistance to isoniazid (H), rifampin (R), streptomycin (S), ethambutol (E), pyrazinamide (Z), and ofloxacin (Ofx) is indicated. Assays were run in triplicate. The mean is reported, with the standard error of the mean ranging from 0 to 1.9. Spoligotypes are assigned a numerical code according to international standards (29). Isolates not coded in the international database are reported as not defined (ND). Lineage designation also follows international standards.

Twenty-two different spoligotypes from 5 different M. tuberculosis lineages were represented among the isolates (29). Spoligotype did not appear to affect the MIC, but the sample size was insufficient for statistical analysis. MICs from H and LAM lineages did not show significant variance (P = 0.91).

Thus, MICs of NTZ for clinical isolates of M. tuberculosis were not significantly different from that seen for the H37Rv laboratory strain and were not affected by resistance to first- and second-line TB drugs or by spoligotype. Plasma NTZ levels of 30.7 μg/ml have been observed in human volunteers following the administration of 1g NTZ twice daily (b.i.d.) with minimal side effects (30). These concentrations are nearly double the median MICs observed among sputum samples shown in this report as well as concentrations shown to be bactericidal against H37Rv (23).

NTZ and tizoxanide accumulate in M. tuberculosis and disrupt M. tuberculosis's membrane potential and intrabacterial pH homeostasis (31). Neither of these mechanisms accounts for NTZ's synergistic mycobactericidal activity with reactive nitrogen intermediates (31), and NTZ's molecular targets within M. tuberculosis are unknown. In protozoa, NTZ inhibits pyruvate-ferredoxin oxidoreductase (PFOR). PFOR is an essential enzyme in some anaerobic and microaerophilic microbes but has not been identified in M. tuberculosis (32).

NTZ has host targets as well, leading to immune modulatory effects that may augment its direct antimicrobial actions. For example, NTZ activates the double-stranded RNA (dsRNA)-dependent protein kinase PKR, leading to increased phosphorylation of eukaryotic initiation factor 2α (eIF2α) (17, 22, 33). NTZ inhibits the quinone reductase NQO1, which contributes to suppression of signaling by the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTORC1) and is associated with stimulation of autophagy within macrophages, enhancing their mycobactericidal activity (34).

In summary, NTZ has significant bactericidal activity against replicating and nonreplicating H37Rv M. tuberculosis, exhibits an ultralow frequency of resistance, and has an excellent clinical safety record when used as an approved antimicrobial agent for other indications. NTZ is quantitatively glucuronidated in mice, and the glucuronide is inactive against M. tuberculosis (L. P. Sorio de Carvalho and C. Nathan, unpublished observations), so studies of NTZ in mouse models of tuberculosis have not been informative. Given the safety record of NTZ in humans and the present demonstration that NTZ was comparably effective in vitro against M. tuberculosis from 50 clinical isolates with various drug resistance patterns and spoligotypes at clinically relevant concentrations, we believe that trials of the 2-week early bactericidal activity of the drug are warranted for the experimental treatment of drug-resistant TB.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We are grateful to the staff of the GHESKIO laboratory and treatment centers, to Gertrude Mardi (GHESKIO) and Julia Roberts (Weill Cornell Medical College) for technical assistance, to Kathy Zhou (Weill Cornell Medical College) for statistical analysis, and to Ben Gold, Selin Somersan, Kyu Rhee, Amy Cunningham-Bussel, and Sean Collins (Weill Cornell Medical College) for stimulating discussions.

We thank the NIH Fogarty International Center (TW00018), National Institutes of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (AI098627), and the Milstein Program for Chemical Biology of Infectious Disease for funding. The Department of Microbiology and Immunology is supported by the William Randolph Hearst Foundation.

Footnotes

Published ahead of print 18 March 2013

REFERENCES

  • 1. Babu GR, Laxminarayan R. 2012. The unsurprising story of MDR-TB resistance in India. Tuberculosis 92:301–306 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Marahatta SB. 2010. Multi-drug resistant tuberculosis burden and risk factors: an update. Kathmandu Univ. Med. J. 8:116–125 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Dalton T, Cegielski P, Akksilp S, Asencios L, Campos Caoili J, Cho SN, Erokhin VV, Ershova J, Gler MT, Kazennyy BY, Kim HJ, Kliiman K, Kurbatova E, Kvasnovsky C, Leimane V, van der Walt M, Via LE, Volchenkov GV, Yagui MA, Kang H, Global PETTS Investigators 2012. Prevalence of and risk factors for resistance to second-line drugs in people with multidrug-resistant tuberculosis in eight countries: a prospective cohort study. Lancet 380:1406–1417 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Raviglione MC, Smith IM. 2007. XDR tuberculosis—implications for global public health. N. Engl. J. Med. 356:656–659 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. The Lancet Infectious Diseases 2011. The worldwide epidemic of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis. Lancet Infect. Dis. 11:333. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Zignol M, Hosseini MS, Wright A, Weezenbeek CL, Nunn P, Watt CJ, Williams BG, Dye C. 2006. Global incidence of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis. J. Infect. Dis. 194:479–485 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Loewenberg S. 2012. India reports cases of totally drug-resistant tuberculosis. Lancet 379:205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Velayati AA, Masjedi MR, Farnia P, Tabarsi P, Ghanavi J, Ziazarifi AH, Hoffner SE. 2009. Emergence of new forms of totally drug-resistant tuberculosis bacilli: super extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis or totally drug-resistant strains in Iran. Chest 136:420–425 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Nathan C, Gold B, Lin G, Stegman M, de Carvalho LP, Vandal O, Venugopal A, Bryk R. 2008. A philosophy of anti-infectives as a guide in the search for new drugs for tuberculosis. Tuberculosis 88(Suppl 1):S25–S33 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Koul A, Arnoult E, Lounis N, Guillemont J, Andries K. 2011. The challenge of new drug discovery for tuberculosis. Nature 469:483–490 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Ortiz JJ, Ayoub A, Gargala G, Chegne NL, Favennec L. 2001. Randomized clinical study of nitazoxanide compared to metronidazole in the treatment of symptomatic giardiasis in children from Northern Peru. Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther. 15:1409–1415 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Rossignol JF, Ayoub A, Ayers MS. 2001. Treatment of diarrhea caused by Cryptosporidium parvum: a prospective randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of nitazoxanide. J. Infect. Dis. 184:103–106 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Aslam S, Musher DM. 2007. Nitazoxanide: clinical studies of a broad-spectrum anti-infective agent. Future Microbiol. 2:583–590 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Stachulski AV, Pidathala C, Row EC, Sharma R, Berry NG, Iqbal M, Bentley J, Allman SA, Edwards G, Helm A, Hellier J, Korba BE, Semple JE, Rossignol JF. 2011. Thiazolides as novel antiviral agents. 1. Inhibition of hepatitis B virus replication. J. Med. Chem. 54:4119–4132 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Adagu IS, Nolder D, Warhurst DC, Rossignol JF. 2002. In vitro activity of nitazoxanide and related compounds against isolates of Giardia intestinalis, Entamoeba histolytica and Trichomonas vaginalis. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 49:103–111 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Theodos CM, Griffiths JK, D'Onfro J, Fairfield A, Tzipori S. 1998. Efficacy of nitazoxanide against Cryptosporidium parvum in cell culture and in animal models. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 42:1959–1965 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Darling JM, Fried MW. 2009. Nitazoxanide: beyond parasites toward a novel agent for hepatitis C. Gastroenterology 136:760–763 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Korba BE, Montero AB, Farrar K, Gaye K, Mukerjee S, Ayers MS, Rossignol JF. 2008. Nitazoxanide, tizoxanide and other thiazolides are potent inhibitors of hepatitis B virus and hepatitis C virus replication. Antiviral Res. 77:56–63 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Rossignol JF, Elfert A, Keeffe EB. 2010. Treatment of chronic hepatitis C using a 4-week lead-in with nitazoxanide before peginterferon plus nitazoxanide. J. Clin. Gastroenterol. 44:504–509 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Rossignol JF, Kabil SM, El-Gohary Y, Elfert A, Keefe EB. 2008. Clinical trial: randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of nitazoxanide monotherapy for the treatment of patients with chronic hepatitis C genotype 4. Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther. 28:574–580 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Stachulski AV, Pidathala C, Row EC, Sharma R, Berry NG, Lawrenson AS, Moores SL, Iqbal M, Bentley J, Allman SA, Edwards G, Helm A, Hellier J, Korba BE, Semple JE, Rossignol JF. 2011. Thiazolides as novel antiviral agents. 2. Inhibition of hepatitis C virus replication. J. Med. Chem. 54:8670–8680 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Elazar M, Liu M, McKenna SA, Liu P, Gehrig EA, Puglisi JD, Rossignol JF, Glenn JS. 2009. The anti-hepatitis C agent nitazoxanide induces phosphorylation of eukaryotic initiation factor 2α via protein kinase activated by double-stranded RNA activation. Gastroenterology 137:1827–1835 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. de Carvalho LP, Lin G, Jiang X, Nathan C. 2009. Nitazoxanide kills replicating and nonreplicating Mycobacterium tuberculosis and evades resistance. J. Med. Chem. 52:5789–5792 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Gold B, Pingle M, Brickner SJ, Shah N, Roberts J, Rundell M, Bracken WC, Warrier T, Somersan S, Venugopal A, Darby C, Jiang X, Warren JD, Fernandez J, Ouerfelli O, Nuermberger EL, Cunningham-Bussel A, Rath P, Chidawanyika T, Deng H, Realubit R, Glickman JF, Nathan CF. 2012. A non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug sensitizes Mycobacterium tuberculosis to endogenous and exogenous antimicrobials. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 109:16004–16011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS) 2003. Susceptibility testing of Mycobacteria, Nocardiae, and other aerobic Actinomycetes. NCCLS document M24-A. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards, Wayne, PA: [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Kamerbeek J, Schouls L, Kolk A, van Agterveld M, van Soolingen D, Kuijper S, Bunschoten A, Molhuizen H, Shaw R, Goyal M, van Embden J. 1997. Simultaneous detection and strain differentiation of Mycobacterium tuberculosis for diagnosis and epidemiology. J. Clin. Microbiol. 35:907–914 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Cowan LS, Diem L, Brake MC, Crawford JT. 2004. Transfer of a Mycobacterium tuberculosis genotyping method, spoligotyping, from a reverse line-blot hybridization, membrane-based assay to the Luminex multianalyte profiling system. J. Clin. Microbiol. 42:474–477 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Demay C, Liens B, Burguière T, Hill V, Couvin D, Millet J, Mokrousov I, Sola C, Zozio T, Rastogi N. 2012. SITVITWEB—a publicly available international multimarker database for studying Mycobacterium tuberculosis genetic diversity and molecular epidemiology. Infect. Genet. Evol. 12:755–766 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Brudey K, Driscoll JR, Rigouts L, Prodinger WM, Gori A, Al-Hajoj SA, Allix C, Aristimuño L, Arora J, Baumanis V, Binder L, Cafrune P, Cataldi A, Cheong S, Diel R, Ellermeier C, Evans JT, Fauville-Dufaux M, Ferdinand S, Garcia de Viedma D, Garzelli C, Gazzola L, Gomes HM, Guttierez MC, Hawkey PM, van Helden PD, Kadival GV, Kreiswirth BN, Kremer K, Kubin M, Kulkarni SP, Liens B, Lillebaek T, Ho ML, Martin C, Martin C, Mokrousov I, Narvskaïa O, Ngeow YF, Naumann L, Niemann S, Parwati I, Rahim Z, Rasolofo-Razanamparany V, Rasolonavalona T, Rossetti ML, Rüsch-Gerdes S, Sajduda A, Samper S, Shemyakin IG, Singh UB, Somoskovi A, Skuce RA, van Soolingen D, Streicher EM, Suffys PN, Tortoli E, Tracevska T, Vincent V, Victor TC, Warren RM, Yap SF, Zaman K, Portaels F, Rastogi N, Sola C. 2006. Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex genetic diversity: mining the fourth international spoligotyping database (SpolDB4) for classification, population genetics and epidemiology. BMC Microbiol. 6:23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Stockis A, De Bruyn S, Gengler C, Rosillon D. 2002. Nitazoxanide pharmacokinetics and tolerability in man during 7 days dosing with 0.5 g and 1 g b.i.d. Int. J. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 40:221–227 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. de Carvalho LP, Darby CM, Rhee KY, Nathan C. 2011. Nitazoxanide disrupts membrane potential and intrabacterial pH homeostasis of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. 2:849–854 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Hoffman PS, Sisson G, Croxen MA, Welch K, Harman WD, Cremades N, Morash MG. 2007. Antiparasitic drug nitazoxanide inhibits the pyruvate oxidoreductases of Helicobacter pylori, selected anaerobic bacteria and parasites, and Campylobacter jejuni. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 51:868–876 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Korba BE, Elazar M, Liu P, Rossignol JF, Glenn JS. 2008. Potential for hepatitis C virus resistance to nitazoxanide or tizoxanide. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 52:4069–4071 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Lam KK, Zheng X, Forestieri R, Balgi AD, Nodwell M, Vollett S, Anderson HJ, Andersen RJ, Av-Gay Y, Roberge M. 2012. Nitazoxanide stimulates autophagy and inhibits mTORC1 signaling and intracellular proliferation of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. PLoS Pathog. 8:e1002691 doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1002691 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES