Skip to main content
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy logoLink to Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
. 2013 Jun;57(6):2845–2848. doi: 10.1128/AAC.02619-12

Molecular Characterization and In Vitro Antifungal Susceptibility Profile of Schizophyllum commune, an Emerging Basidiomycete in Bronchopulmonary Mycoses

Anuradha Chowdhary a,, Shallu Kathuria a, Pradeep Kumar Singh a, Kshitij Agarwal b, Shailendra N Gaur b, Pradip Roy a, Harbans S Randhawa a, Jacques F Meis c,d,
PMCID: PMC3716139  PMID: 23507274

Abstract

Schizophyllum commune (n = 30) showed lowest geometric mean MICs of isavuconazole (0.19 μg/ml), itraconazole (0.2 μg/ml), voriconazole (0.24 μg/ml), and amphotericin B (0.29 μg/ml) and high geometric mean MICs of fluconazole (19.39 μg/ml) and flucytosine (17.28 μg/ml). Five cases (of 8) of allergic bronchopulmonary mycosis that were treated with itraconazole had no recrudescence after 6 to 24 months of follow-up. One case each of invasive pulmonary mycosis and fungal ball were treated successfully with voriconazole and itraconazole.

TEXT

Schizophyllum commune is an emerging, filamentous pathogenic basidiomycete, causing an array of allergic and invasive clinical manifestations. Its definitive identification is problematic, as it grows in culture mostly as sterile cottony white colonies without sporulation (1, 2). This is particularly true of monokaryotic isolates, which, unlike the dikaryotic ones, are devoid of the characteristic spicules or clamp connections and thus cannot be identified by phenotypic methods and therefore require sequencing (13). Previously, we have reported S. commune as the etiologic agent in one case each of allergic bronchopulmonary mycosis (ABPM) and of pulmonary fungal ball and reviewed 76 cases with diverse clinical manifestations. Schizophyllum commune has a global distribution, causing respiratory infections in an overwhelming number (94.7%) of cases (4). As the majority of the respiratory infections reported to be due to S. commune are allergic bronchopulmonary and sinonasal, their therapy aims at suppression of the immune response and prevention/eradication of fungal colonization in the airways (5, 6). Schizophyllum commune-associated allergic rhinosinusitis usually runs a protracted course. Its surgical treatment alone is not adequate, and it must be combined with antifungal treatment (7). Furthermore, adjunctive antifungal therapy has been suggested to guard against the risk of dissemination or recurrence of the disease (811). Despite the increasing clinical importance of S. commune, information on its molecular identification and antifungal susceptibility profile is scanty and limited to a small number or individual isolates (4, 12). We report the in vitro antifungal susceptibility to azoles, amphotericin B, and flucytosine of a wide array of S. commune strains isolated from patients with sinonasal and bronchopulmonary mycoses and identified by the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region of ribosomal DNA and D1/D2 of larger subunit (LSU) region sequencing. In addition, we discuss outcomes of antifungal treatment in 11 patients.

A total of 26 (0.5%) strains of S. commune were isolated from 4,662 clinical specimens from an equal number of patients with respiratory diseases who were residing in Northwestern India during January 2010 through September 2012. The clinical specimens included mucus plugs, sputum, bronchoalveolar lavage fluid, fine needle aspirate biopsy specimens, nasal washings, and sinus aspirates which were cultured on Sabouraud's glucose agar (SGA) plates with or without 10 μg/ml benomyl. Incorporation of benomyl in the medium facilitates selective isolation of basidiomycetes (13). The culture-positive specimens yielded multiple cottony white mold colonies after 7 to 9 days on SGA plates incubated at 28°C and 37°C. Slide cultures of all isolates on potato dextrose agar (PDA) after 4 weeks of incubation at 28°C showed hyaline, septate hyphae with clamp connections and spicules suggestive of a basidiomycete, but morphological identification was not possible (2). However, only 4 (15.3%) of the 26 isolates showed the development of fruiting body with fan-shaped basidiocarps on PDA at 28°C, after 4 to 5 weeks, with periodic exposure to light which was consistent with the presence of S. commune. Isolates were maintained on PDA slants and in normal saline suspensions at room temperature.

Identification of all the S. commune isolates was done by sequencing ITS and LSU regions as described previously (4, 14). ITS sequences (GenBank accession numbers KC414792 to KC414814) of 23 S. commune isolates showed 99% homology to S. commune sequences with accession numbers FJ372689.1, AB369910.1, and JF19817.1 and LSU sequences (Genbank accession numbers KC414815 to KC414840) of all 26 isolates showed 99% homology with accession numbers HM595605.1, GQ254661.1, and AB428351.1 in GenBank. ITS sequences of 3 isolates were nonreadable. All of the 26 isolates were deposited in the CBS-KNAW Fungal Biodiversity Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Antifungal susceptibility testing of the 26 clinical isolates and 4 reference strains (CBS10320, CBS333.85, CBS579.83, and CBS109426) of S. commune was performed using a slightly modified version of the CLSI-M38-A2 method (15). The modifications included growth of isolates on PDA for 2 weeks at 28°C and a higher working inoculum of 2.5 × 104 to 5.0 × 104 hyphal fragments/spores per ml. Microtiter plates were incubated at 35°C for 96 h. MIC endpoints were read visually. The quality control strain data were in the recommended ranges, and the reproducibility of the in vitro results was assessed by determining MICs for all strains twice on two different days. The results of the in vitro susceptibility assessments are presented in Table 1. The isolates had low geometric mean (GM) MICs of azoles and amphotericin B (0.29 μg/ml) but high MICs of fluconazole (19.39 μg/ml) and flucytosine (17.28 μg/ml).

Table 1.

In vitro profiles of susceptibility of 26 clinical and 4 reference isolates of Schizophyllum commune to various antifungals

Parameter Value(s) (μg/ml)a
AMB FLU ITC VRC ISA FC
GM 0.29 19.39 0.20 0.24 0.19 17.28
MIC50 0.5 16 0.125 0.25 0.125 32
MIC90 1 64 1 0.5 0.5 64
Range 0.03–2 2–64 0.03–8 0.06–2 0.015–2 2–64
a

AMB, amphotericin B; FLU, fluconazole; ITC, itraconazole; VRC, voriconazole; ISA, isavuconazole; FC, flucytosine.

Clinical evaluation revealed that 12 (46%) of the cases had ABPM, 3 (11.5%) each had pulmonary fungal ball and invasive pulmonary mycosis, and 2 (7.6%) had allergic fungal sinusitis. Of the remaining 6 patients, 3 had pulmonary tuberculosis, including 2 with cavitation and 1 with interstitial lung disease who was on long-term systemic steroids, and 3 had chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases (COPD) with bronchiectasis. Therapeutic outcome was available for 11 of the 26 patients. Of these, 8 patients with ABPM, and 1 each with invasive pulmonary mycosis and fungal ball, received itraconazole at 200 mg (twice a day [BID]) for 3 to 6 months and 1 with a case of invasive pulmonary mycosis received voriconazole at 200 mg (BID) for 4 months.

This report provides information on the in vitro antifungal susceptibility of a large collection of S. commune strains isolated from patients with respiratory diseases. Information previously available was collected in a sporadic manner and mostly restricted to individual isolates, except one report by González et al. (12), who investigated the susceptibility of 5 strains (Table 2) (4, 7, 12, 1619). They showed that itraconazole had the lowest GM MICs followed by posaconazole, amphotericin B, and voriconazole (12). Notably, isavuconazole, a newer azole, had not been tested previously for its activity against S. commune. Our isolates had variable MICs of fluconazole, ranging between 2 and 64 μg/ml. This kind of variation in susceptibility to fluconazole was previously reported with single isolates of S. commune which had MICs of 12.5 μg/ml (17) and 4 μg/ml (18).

Table 2.

Overview of published reports on in vitro antifungal susceptibility testing of Schizophyllum commune isolatesa

No. of isolates tested Source of isolates MIC (μg/ml) of antifungal(s) Yr Reference
1 Maxillary sinus drainage AMB, <0.025 1992 7
1 Resected lung AMB, <0.03; FLU, 8 1996 16
1 Mucoid plugs ITC, 0.125; AMB, 0.39; FLU, 12.5 2000 17
5 Bronchial washing, frontal sinus tissue, ethmoid tissue, maxillary sinus tissue, sinus tissue AMB, 0.5–0.5; FLU, 8–16; ITC, 0.06–0.125; VRC, 0.5–1; POS, 0.25–0.5; FC, 8–16 2001 12
1 Bronchial aspirate FLU, 4 2008 18
1 Maxillary sinus drainage AMB, 0.023; FLU, >256; ITC, 0.25; VRC, 0.06 2010 19
2 Mucoid plugs, sputum AMB, 0.5–1; ITC, <0.06–0.125; VRC, 0.5–1; POS, <0.015–0.125; ISA, 0.125–0.25 2012 4
30 Sputum, mucoid plugs, bronchial aspirates, BAL, FNAB AMB, 0.03–2; FLU, 2–64; ITC, 0.03–8; VRC, 0.06–2; ISA, <0.015–2; FC, 2–64 2012 Present study
a

BAL, bronchoalveolar lavage; FNAB, fine needle aspirate biopsy; AMB, amphotericin B; FLU, fluconazole; ITC, itraconazole; VRC, voriconazole; POS, posaconazole; FC, flucytosine; ISA, isavuconazole.

Currently, experience with antifungal therapy in cases of respiratory mycoses due to S. commune is limited. Among the 29 globally reported cases of S. commune infection who had received antifungal therapy, there were 11 cases each with ABPM, 9 with sinusitis, 4 with bronchial mucoid impaction, and 1 case each with brain abscess, ulcer of the palate, fungal ball, bronchopneumonia, and pulmonary nodule (4, 710, 1637). Of the 18 patients treated with itraconazole, all of them responded favorably without recurrence (4, 810, 19, 20, 2431, 3335). These included eight cases with ABPM, seven with sinusitis, and three with mucoid impaction and a solitary case of fungal ball. Likewise, of the eight cases of ABPM treated with oral itraconazole therapy in this study, five showed no recrudescence of symptoms after 6 to 18 months of follow-up. This includes three patients who are under further follow-up, and they are still in remission. It is noteworthy that a low dose of itraconazole prevented relapse of ABPM upon environmental reexposure of the patient (27). Also, a solitary case of fungal ball with hemoptysis in our study was successfully managed with itraconazole administered at 200 mg (BID) for 4 months. The patient's hemoptysis stopped, and he has been asymptomatic for the last 9 months.

Cases of invasive disease due to S. commune have been treated with amphotericin B, itraconazole, and fluconazole, singly or in combination, with variable success (2, 7, 16, 36). Of the 3 patients with suspected invasive pulmonary diseases in the present report, one presented with a lung mass in the right upper lobe and improved with 4 months of voriconazole. In the remaining two patients, outcome of therapy could not be assessed, as one patient with a right parahilar mass succumbed to sudden hemoptysis after 2 weeks of itraconazole therapy and a second patient with diffuse nodular shadows died shortly after initiation of amphotericin B therapy at 1 mg/kg/day. Restrepo et al. (36) reported a case of invasive palatal ulceration treated with amphotericin B for 3 months which resulted in complete regression. Also, a case of brain abscess in a patient who received amphotericin B for over 36 days is on the record. Although his lesions regressed, he died due to respiratory failure (16).

Molecular techniques are required for definitive identification of this emerging basidiomycete. Kamei et al. (38) reported that 58% of the S. commune isolates were monokaryotic and therefore unidentifiable by morphological methods. In the present study, all of the 26 isolates were confirmed by LSU sequencing but only 4 showed formation of basidiocarps. Therefore, gene sequencing is required for accurate identification to determine the etiology of the disease. Although the role of amphotericin B in invasive S. commune disease is well established, our study highlights the utility of itraconazole and voriconazole in managing chronic respiratory diseases.

Nucleotide sequence accession numbers.

The nucleotide sequences determined in this work are available under GenBank accession numbers KC414792 to KC414840.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

H.S.R. acknowledges the award of an Honorary Scientist position by the Indian National Science Academy, New Delhi. This work was carried out, in part, with financial assistance from the Department of Biotechnology (BT/39/NE/TBP/2010), Government of India, New Delhi.

J.F.M. discloses that he received grants from Astellas, Basilea, and Merck. He has been a consultant to Astellas, Basilea, and Merck and received speaker's fees from Merck and Gilead. A.C., S.K., P.K.S., K.A., S.N.G., P.R., and H.S.R. declare that we have no potential conflicts of interest.

Footnotes

Published ahead of print 18 March 2013

REFERENCES

  • 1. Pounder JI, Simmon KE, Barton CA, Hohmann SL, Brandt ME, Petti CA. 2007. Discovering potential pathogens among fungi identified as nonsporulating molds. J. Clin. Microbiol. 45:568–571 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Sigler L, de la Maza LM, Tan G, Egger KN, Sherburne RK. 1995. Diagnostic difficulties caused by a nonclamped Schizophyllum commune isolate in a case of fungus ball of the lung. J. Clin. Microbiol. 33:1979–1983 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Romanelli AM, Sutton DA, Thompson EH, Rinaldi MG, Wickes BL. 2010. Sequence-based identification of filamentous basidiomycetous fungi from clinical specimens: a cautionary note. J. Clin. Microbiol. 48:741–752 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Chowdhary A, Randhawa HS, Gaur SN, Agarwal K, Kathuria S, Roy P, Klaassen CH, Meis JF. 2013. Schizophyllum commune as an emerging fungal pathogen: a review and report of two cases. Mycoses 56:1–10 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Denning DW, O'Driscoll BR, Powell G, Chew F, Atherton GT, Vyas A, Miles J, Morris J, Niven RM. 2009. Randomized controlled trial of oral antifungal treatment for severe asthma with fungal sensitization (SAFS); the FAST study. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 179:11–18 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Chowdhary A, Agarwal K, Kathuria S, Gaur SN, Randhawa HS, Meis JF. 5 February 2013. Allergic bronchopulmonary mycosis due to fungi other than Aspergillus: a global overview. Crit. Rev. Microbiol. [Epub ahead of print.] doi:10.3109/1040841X.2012.754401 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Rosenthal J, Katz R, DuBois DB, Morrissey A, Machicao A. 1992. Chronic maxillary sinusitis associated with the mushroom Schizophyllum commune in a patient with AIDS. Clin. Infect. Dis. 14:46–48 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Clark S, Campbell CK, Sandison A, Choa DI. 1996. Schizophyllum commune: an unusual isolate from a patient with allergic fungal sinusitis. J. Infect. 32:147–150 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Sigler L, Estrada S, Montealegre NA, Jaramillo E, Arango M, De Bedout C, Restrepo A. 1997. Maxillary sinusitis caused by Schizophyllum commune and experience with treatment. J. Med. Vet. Mycol. 35:365–370 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Shaw CL, McCleave M, Wormald PJ. 2000. Unusual presentations of isolated sphenoid fungal sinusitis. J. Laryngol. Otol. 114:385–388 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Roh ML, Tuazon CU, Mandler R, Kwon-Chung KJ, Geist CE. 2005. Sphenocavernous syndrome associated with Schizophyllum commune infection of the sphenoid sinus. Ophthal. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 21:71–74 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. González GM, Sutton DA, Thompson E, Tijerina R, Rinaldi MG. 2001. In vitro activities of approved and investigational antifungal agents against 44 clinical isolates of basidiomycetous fungi. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 45:633–635 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Summerbell RC. 1993. The benomyl test as a fundamental diagnostic method for medical mycology. J. Clin. Microbiol. 31:572–577 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Chowdhary A, Agarwal K, Kathuria S, Singh PK, Roy P, Gaur SN, de Hoog GS, Meis JF. 2013. Clinical significance of filamentous basidiomycetes, illustrated by the novel opportunist Ceriporia lacerata isolated from the human respiratory tract. J. Clin. Microbiol. 51:585–590 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute 2008. Reference method for broth dilution antimicrobial susceptibility testing of filamentous fungi—2nd ed: approved standard M38-A2. CLSI, Wayne, PA [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Rihs JD, Padhye AA, Good CB. 1996. Brain abscess caused by Schizophyllum commune: an emerging basidiomycete pathogen. J. Clin. Microbiol. 34:1628–1632 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Miyazaki Y, Sakashita H, Tanaka T, Kamei K, Nishimura K, Yoshizawa Y. 2000. Mucoid impaction caused by monokaryotic mycelium of Schizophyllum commune in association with bronchiectasis. Intern. Med. 39:160–162 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Tullio V, Mandras N, Banche G, Allizond V, Gaido E, Roana J, Cuffini AM, Carlone NA. 2008. Schizophyllum commune: an unusual agent of bronchopneumonia in an immunocompromised patient. Med. Mycol. 46:735–738 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Castro LÁ, Álvarez MI, Martínez E. 2010. Case report of Schizophyllum commune sinusitis in an immunocompetent patient. Colomb. Med. 41:71–75 [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Kamei K, Unno H, Nagao K, Kuriyama T, Nishimura K, Miyaji M. 1994. Allergic bronchopulmonary mycosis caused by the basidiomycetous fungus Schizophyllum commune. Clin. Infect. Dis. 18:305–309 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Tomita K, Hashizume I, Kasamatsu N, Nakamura A, Hanzawa S, Momiki S, Sasaki K, Okamoto K, Ozawa T, Kamei K. 1996. Allergic bronchopulmonary mycosis caused by Schizophyllum commune. Nihon Kyobu Shikkan Gakkai Zasshi 34:804–809 (In Japanese.) [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Ikushima S. 1997. Case of allergic bronchopulmonary mycosis caused by Schizophyllum commune. Jpn. J. Antibiot. 50:47–49 (In Japanese.) [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Yamashina S. 1997. Case of allergic bronchopulmonary mycosis caused by Schizophyllum commune. Jpn. J. Antibiot. 50:51–53 (In Japanese.) [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Amemiya Y, Shirai R, Tokimatsu I, Oka H, Iwata A, Otani S, Umeki K, Sakashita H, Ishii H, Gendo Y, Kishi K, Hiramatsu K, Kadota J. 2009. Allergic bronchopulmonary mycosis induced by Schizophyllum commune—case report and review of the literature. Nihon Kokyuki Gakkai Zasshi 47:692–697 (In Japanese.) [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Uruga H, Imafuku A, Hanada S, Takaya H, Miyamoto A, Sugimoto H, Morokawa N, Kurosaki A, Fujii T, Kishi K. 2010. A case of allergic bronchopulmonary mycosis caused by Schizophyllum commune presenting with hyperattenuated mucoid impaction. Nihon Kokyuki Gakkai Zasshi 48:749–754 (In Japanese.) [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Ishiguro T, Takayanagi N, Saito A, Akiyama K, Wakayama M, Shibuya K, Shimizu Y, Sugita Y, Kamei K. 2011. Allergic bronchopulmonary mycosis due to Schizophyllum commune and Aspergillus fumigatus. Nihon Kokyuki Gakkai Zasshi 49:612–618 (In Japanese.) [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Ogawa H, Fujimura M, Takeuchi Y, Makimura K. 2011. Two cases of Schizophyllum asthma: is this a new clinical entity or a precursor of ABPM? Pulm. Pharmacol. Ther. 24:559–562 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Ogawa H, Fujimura M, Takeuchi Y, Makimura K, Satoh K. 2012. The definitive diagnostic process and successful treatment for ABPM caused by Schizophyllum commune: a report of two cases. Allergol. Int. 61:163–169 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Ahmed MK, Ishino T, Takeno S, Hirakawa K. 2009. Bilateral allergic fungal rhinosinusitis caused by Schizophyllum commune and Aspergillus niger. A case report. Rhinology 47:217–221 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Pekic S, Arsenijevic VA, Gazibara MS, Milojevic T, Pendjer I, Stojanovic M, Popovic V. 2010. What lurks in the sellar? Lancet 375:432 doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61835-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Perić A, Vojvodić D, Zolotarevski L, Perić A. 2011. Nasal polyposis and fungal Schizophyllum commune infection: a case report. Acta Medica (Hradec Kralove) 54:83–86 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Sa HS, Ko KS, Woo KI, Peck KR, Kim YD. 2012. A case of sino-orbital infection caused by Schizophyllum commune. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 73:376–377 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Itou Y, Sasaki S, Watanabe S, Kawamura T, Nakahara Y, Mochizuki Y, Kamei K. 2001. A case of mucoid impaction of bronchi (MIB) due to Schizophyllum commune. Nihon Kokyuki Gakkai Zasshi 39:266–270 (In Japanese.) [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Ishiguro T, Takayanagi N, Tokunaga D, Kurashima K, Matsushita A, Harasawa K, Yoneda K, Tsuchiya N, Yamaguchi S, Miyahara Y, Yano R, Saito H, Ubukata M, Yanagisawa T, Sugita Y, Kawabata Y. 2007. Pulmonary Schizophyllum commune infection developing mucoid impaction of the bronchi. Yale J. Biol. Med. 80:105–111 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Ishiguro T, Takayanagi N, Harasaw K, Yoshii Y, Matsushita A, Yoneda K, Miyahara Y, Kagiyama N, Tokunaga D, Aoki F, Saito H, Ubukata M, Kurashima K, Yanagisawa T, Sugita Y, Kawabata Y, Kamei K. 2009. Mucoid impaction of the bronchi caused by Schizophyllum commune which developed after discontinuation of itraconazole administration. Nihon Kokyuki Gakkai Zasshi 47:296–303 (In Japanese.) [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Restrepo A, Greer DL, Robledo M, Osorio O, Mondragon H. 1973. Ulceration of the palate caused by a basidiomycete Schizophyllum commune. Sabouraudia 11:201–204 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Roan JN, Hsieh HY, Tsai HW, Roan JN, Hsieh HY, Tsai HW, Wu CJ, Hsu CH, Wu SY, Yang YJ, Chang TC. 2009. Pulmonary nodules caused by Schizophyllum commune after cardiac transplantation. J. Infect. 58:164–167 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Kamei K, Unno H, Ito J, Nishimura K, Miyaji M. 1999. Analysis of the cases in which Schizophyllum commune was isolated. Nihon Ishinkin Gakkai Zasshi 40:175–181 (In Japanese.) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES