Skip to main content
BMC Infectious Diseases logoLink to BMC Infectious Diseases
. 2013 Jul 17;13:326. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-13-326

Cerebrospinal-fluid cytokine and chemokine profile in patients with pneumococcal and meningococcal meningitis

Leonam G Coutinho 1, Denis Grandgirard 2, Stephen L Leib 2, Lucymara F Agnez-Lima 1,
PMCID: PMC3717124  PMID: 23865742

Abstract

Background

Bacterial meningitis is characterized by an intense inflammatory reaction contributing to neuronal damage. The aim of this study was to obtain a comparative analysis of cytokines and chemokines in patients with pneumococcal (PM) and meningococcal meningitis (MM) considering that a clear difference between the immune response induced by these pathogens remains unclear.

Methods

The cyto/chemokines, IL-1β, IL-2, IL-6, TNF-α, IFN-γ, IL-10, IL-1Ra, CXCL8/IL-8, CCL2/MCP-1, CLL3/MIP-1α, CCL4/MIP-1γ and G-CSF, were measured in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) samples from patients with PM and MM. Additionally, a literature review about the expression of cytokines in CSF samples of patients with MB was made.

Results

Concerning cytokines levels, only IFN-γ was significantly higher in patients with Streptococcus pneumoniae compared to those with Neisseria meningitidis, regardless of the time when the lumbar puncture (LP) was made. Furthermore, when samples were compared considering the timing of the LP, higher levels of TNF-α (P <0.05) were observed in MM patients whose LP was made within 48 h from the initial symptoms of disease. We also observed that the index of release of cyto/chemokines per cell was significantly higher in PM. From the literature review, it was observed that TNF-α, IL-1β and IL-6 are the best studied cytokines, while reports describing the concentration of the cytokine IL-2, IL-1Ra, G-CSF and CCL4/MIP-1β in CSF samples of patients with bacterial meningitis were not found.

Conclusion

The data obtained in this study and the previously published data show a similar profile of cytokine expression during PM and MM. Nevertheless, the high levels of IFN-γ and the ability to release high levels of cytokines with a low number of cells are important factors to be considered in the pathogenesis of PM and thereby should be further investigated. Moreover, differences in the early response induced by the pathogens were observed. However, the differences observed are not sufficient to trigger changes in the current therapy of corticosteroids adopted in both the PM and MM.

Keywords: Pneumococcal meningitis, Meningococcal meningitis, Cytokines, Chemokines, Interferon gamma, Cerebrospinal fluid

Background

Bacterial meningitis (BM) is an infectious disease characterized by high mortality and morbidity rates [1]. After Haemophilus influenza type b immunization, Streptococcus pneumoniae and Neisseria meningitidis have become the two main causes of BM in Brazil [2-4].

The inflammatory response plays a primordial role in the pathogenesis of cerebral injury associated to different meningitis etiologies [5,6]. During BM, bacterial cell-wall components, such as lipopolysaccharide from gram-negative bacteria and lipoteichoic acid from gram-positive bacteria, trigger the massive release of proinflammatory molecules. These in turn increase the permeability of the blood–brain barrier (BBB) and attract leukocytes to the central nervous system (CNS) (pleocytosis). Cytokines, reactive oxygen species, reactive nitrogen species, and matrix metalloproteinases, act in a coordinated manner to promote an oxidative burst leading to energy failure and cell death [7-10]. The pattern of inflammatory mediators present in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) in response to an immune assault determines the disease’s severity and its sequelae [7,11].

BM has often been comprised in a unique group, considering that gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria compounds trigger the same Toll-like receptors (TLR). However, S. pneumoniae and N. meningitidis also seem to modulate different Toll-like receptors that consequently regulate a different expression of cytokines. TLR2, TLR4, and TLR9 are important in the response against S. pneumoniae, while TLR2 does not seem to be essential in the host response to N. meningitidis[12-15]. Conversely, important mediators of chemoattraction, such as CXCL8/IL-8, CCL3/MIP-1α and CCL2/MCP-1, induce a similar intensity of response in relation to S. pneumonia and N. meningitidis[16,17].

Although isolated studies have demonstrated higher cytokine expression during BM caused by different agents, they are limited in establishing differences between the inflammatory responses induced by each pathogen. Relevant questions, such as “are there differences between the inflammatory responses caused by different etiologic agents of BM?” remain to be answered. This comparative study is important because BM continues to have a high occurrence and the outcome from pneumococcal meningitis (PM) differs from that of meningococcal meningitis (MM) [18,19].

Currently, the BM treatment is similar for both etiological agents, i.e. antibiotics and corticosteroids. Dexamethasone remains as the antiinflammatory therapy most used during BM treatment. Clinical trials have shown reduction in unfavorable outcome, such as lower mortality in adults and fewer neurological and auditory sequelae in adults and children during PM, however similar beneficial effect was not seen for dexamethasone during MM [20]. Thus, if there is a marked difference in inflammatory profile, this may have implication for immunomodulatory therapies, which should be tailored differently for each etiology.

In this work, we measured twelve cyto/chemokines that are commonly expressed during BM in the CSF from patients with PM and MM and did a literature review about reports of cyto/chemokine determination in CSF in order to obtain further knowledge about the inflammatory profile in BM caused by meningococci and pneumococci. Since the inflammatory response has been associated to the sequelae occurrence after the disease, a better understanding of the pathophysiologic mechanisms between the host and each causative agent may contribute to designing new therapies for the reduction of death and sequelae caused by this severe disease.

Methods

Case selection and sample collection

Twenty-eight patients who were admitted to the Hospital Giselda Trigueiro (Natal, Brazil) with a suspicion of meningitis were enrolled in this study. This study was evaluated and approved by the Committee on Medical Ethics of the Giselda Trigueiro Hospital and by the National Committee on Ethics (CONEP) with number 0052.1.051.000-05. Informed consent was obtained from each patient participating in this study.

CSF samples were collected by lumbar puncture (LP) during standard routine for diagnosis of meningitis in the Hospital Giselda Trigueiro. The routine diagnosis includes, evaluation of clinical symptoms, detection of the pathogen in the CSF by Gram staining, positive bacterial culture, number of erythrocytes, white blood cell count (WBC) with detection of levels of polymorphonuclear granulocytes (PMN) and protein and glucose contents. Patients who had been treated with antibiotics before LP or with other diseases (such as AIDS) that affect the immune and inflammatory responses (e.g. the cytokines expression) were not included in this study. The CSF samples were collected from the initial LP at the time of admission to hospital. All samples were kept at 4°C after LP and centrifuged (3000 g, 5 min, 4°C). Supernatants were frozen and stored at -80°C until assayed. CSF was assigned a code for anonymization purpose and the study was carried out according to ethical regulations.

Measurement of cyto/chemokine concentration

CSF cyto/chemokines levels were measured by a Bio-Plex 200 suspension array system (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) using microsphere-based multiplex assays. In the assay, the concentration of 12 cyto/chemokines (TNF-α, IL-6, IL-1β, IFN-γ, IL-10, IL-1Ra, CCL3/MIP-1α, CCL4/MIP-1β, CCL2/MCP-1, G-CSF, CXCL8/IL-8 and IL-2) was assessed in 28 CSF samples, using the human cytokine Lincoplex Kit (HCYTO-60 k, Lincoplex®, Linco Research Inc., St Charles, MA, USA). This set of cyto/chemokines was selected from literature data that report their importance during BM in patients or in animal models. Samples (25 μl) were measured undiluted and in duplicate. The assay was performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Samples were diluted to fit in the dynamic range of the assay when appropriate. Cyto/chemokine concentrations were calculated by Bio-Plex Manager software using a 5-parametric logistic standard curve derived from the recombinant cytokine standards provided in the kit.

For statistical analysis, samples with cyto/chemokine levels below or above the detection limits were arbitrarily assigned the values corresponding to the minimum (3.2 pg/ml) or maximum (10,000 pg/ml) limits respectively, spanning the dynamic range of the assay, and following the manufacturer’s instructions.

Data sources

Peer-reviewed articles were searched using the Medical Literature Analysisand Retrieval System Online (National Library of Medicine, Bethesda, Maryland) and Web of Science (Thomson Reuters, New York, NY) until December of 2010, using the key words Bacterial Meningitis plus cytokine plus patient. Additionally, words such as interferon, interleukin, IL-1β, IL-2, IL-6, TNF-α, IFN-γ, IL-10, IL-1Ra, CXCL8/IL-8, CCL2/MCP-1, CCL3/MIP-1α, CCL4/MIP-1β and G-CSF were indentified in the retrieved articles, and reference lists of relevant studies were searched for any additional information.

Study selection and data extraction

Original studies measuring cyto/chemokine concentrations in the CSF of living subjects diagnosed with PM and MM were included. The inclusion criteria required was the presence of the pathogen in the CSF culture or antigen agglutination tests on CSF. Studies measuring cyto/chemokine concentrations from CSF following stimulation and other diseases which can disturb the immune response were excluded to avoid bias associated with the immune challenge. The results of each relevant article were critically analyzed and data of mean, median, standard deviation (SD), standard error (SE), confidence interval (CI) and percentage of each cyto/chemokine concentration for PM and MM were extracted. Studies with qualitative results such as western blot or protein array test were not included.

Statistical analysis

Data were analyzed using Prism 5.0 (GraphPad, San Diego, CA, USA) and tested for normality using Kolmogorov-Smirnov normality test. Almost all the variables did not fit to normal distribution and were analyzed with non-parametric methods. Differences between groups were analyzed using the one-way ANOVA non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis test. Data are expressed as median and (25; 75 percentiles). Pair-wise analysis between two groups was performed using the Mann Whitney test. For all the statistical tests, values of P < 0.05 were considered significant.

Results

CSF samples and cyto/chemokine measurement

In our work, S. pneumoniae was diagnosed in sixteen patients and N. meningitidis in twelve. At the time of diagnosis 5 patients with PM reported that had been sick for 12–48 hours, and 11 had been sick for >2 days. Fever, headache, neck stiffness were present in all patients during clinical diagnosis. PM was associated with brain abscess (n = 3), CSF fistula (n = 2) and acute otitis media (n = 1). Out of 16 patients with PM, 2 died and 14 were cured after standard therapy. Four patients with MM had been sick for <12 hours, 1 had been sick for 12–48 hours, and 7 had been sick for >2 days. As observed for PM, almost all patients with MM presented fever, headache, neck stiffness, mental confusion and petechias. In some cases, MM was associated with meningococcemia (n = 4). All patients with MM included in this study were cured. Overall, the majority of patients in the study were adult. Only six patients under 18 years old were included in PM and four in MM groups. CSF biochemical parameters of each causative agent, including the number of leucocytes, protein, and glucose content results, are presented in Table 1.

Table 1.

Categorization of the meningitis etiologies according CSF routine investigation

CSF (n samples)
Agea
Cell counta
Proteinb
Glucosea
  (years) (cells/mm3) (g/l) (mg/dl)
S. pneumoniae (16)
30 (5; 53)
733 (396; 2,520)
211.6 ± 51.45
17.5 (5; 57)
N. meningitidis (12) 23 (7; 27) 3,360 (929; 12,925)c 150.4 ± 29.8 44.5 (5; 60)

aValues are represented as median (25; 75 percentiles); bValues are represented as mean ± SE; cSignificant value compared to S. pneumoniae (P ≤ 0.05).

The comparison of the concentration of cyto/chemokines in CSF samples is shown in Figure 1. Significant differences in the levels of cyto/chemokines between PM and MM groups were not observed, except for IFN-γ. Elevated level of IFN-γ was observed in the patients with PM (median 237.2 pg/mL, range 34.5-624.7 pg/mL; P < 0.05 ) compared to MM (median 10.33 pg/mL, range 3.5-41.1 pg/mL). Although not statistically significant, an increased level of IL-2 was also observed in patients with PM (median 3.2 pg/mL, range 3.2-22.8 pg/mL; P = 0.08) compared to MM (median 3.2 pg/mL, range 3.2-3.2 pg/mL). Other immune modulators, not identified or poorly identified in prior reports, such as IL-10, IL-1Ra, CCL4/MIP-1β e G-CSF, were measured and no significant difference was observed between the pathogens.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Comparison of cyto/chemokines levels in CSF from S. pneumoniae and N. meningitidis patients. S. pneumoniae patients showed similar levels of cyto/chemokines compared to N. meningitidis patients, except for IFN-γ (P < 0.05 by Mann Whitney test). IL-8 shows a lower number of samples due to CSF availability. Dotted lines mark the upper and lower limits of detection.

Comparative analyses of cytokines levels considering the time of symptoms prior to LP were done. Patients with LP performed within 48 hours (<48 hours) from the initial symptoms were compared to the patients with LP performed more than 48 h after (>48 h) of the onset of symptoms. Firstly, patients with PM or MM were compared separately. Among patients with PM, elevated levels (P <0.05) of IL-1β, MIP-1β and G-CSF were observed in group <48 h, while the patients with MM of the group <48 h showed higher levels (P <0.05) of IL-1β, TNF-α, IL-10, MIP-1α, MIP-1β, G-CSF, in comparison with patients of group >48 h (data not shown). Further, the comparative analyses in relation to the time of LP was done between PM and MM patients. Concerning the time <48 h, higher levels of IFN-γ were observed in patients with PM (median 521.7 pg/mL, range 311.2-1353 pg/mL; P < 0.01 ) compared to MM (median 33.45 pg/mL, range 7.4-92.6 pg/mL), while TNF-α was significantly higher in the CSF of patients with MM (median 2549 pg/mL, range 1047–6513 pg/mL; P < 0.05) compared to patients with PM (median 340.4 pg/mL, range 241.5-895.5 pg/mL) (Figure 2). Between the group >48 h, PM patients showed significant higher levels of IFN-γ, TNF-α, MIP-1α and MIP-1β compared to MM patients (Figure 3). In addition, cytokine levels were compared according to the age of the patients but significant differences were not observed between children (<18 years old) and adults (>18 years old).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Levels of IFN-γ and TNF-α in the CSF of patients with LP within 48 h (<48 h) from initial symptoms. S. pneumoniae patients showed higher levels of IFN-γ compared to N. meningitidis patients (P < 0.01 by Mann Whitney test). The level of TNF-α in the patients with MM was significantly higher than patients with PM (P < 0.05 by Mann Whitney test). Dotted lines mark the upper and lower limits of detection.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Comparison of cytokine levels in patients with LP performed after 48 h (>48 h) from initial symptoms. S. pneumoniae patients showed higher levels of IFN-γ, TNF-α, MIP-1α e MIP-1β compared to N. meningitidis patients (P < 0.05 by Mann Whitney test). Dotted lines mark the upper and lower limits of detection.

Ratio between cyto/chemokine concentration and number of cell in CSF (strength of cyto/chemokine release index)

Cyto/chemokine concentrations were individually categorized by the number of cells in CSF to determine a cyto/chemokine release index. This index was indirectly used to compare the strength of activation of the immune response and the release of cyto/chemokine promoted for each pathogen. In order to avoid the interference of cyto/chemokines originated from the blood as result of the BBB permeability, CSF cyto/chemokine levels were firstly divided through the CSF protein level and then divided by the number of cells to correct the BBB disturbance. The data demonstrated a higher cyto/chemokine/cell number ratio during PM (Figure 4). As observed, PM is characterized by a significant release of chemokines, growth factors and anti inflammatory cytokines. Significant P values are shown in the Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Ratio between cyto/chemokines and the number of PMN cells during infection. Each value of cyto/chemokine was individually divided per amount of cells. During pneumococcal meningitis (● ) cells demonstrated higher ability to release cyto/chemokines than meningococcal meningitis (○). IL-8 shows a lower number of samples due to CSF availability.

Comparative of literature findings and cyto/chemokine concentration

A total of 282 records of cyto/chemokine studies during BM were retrieved from the literature search. Out of 282, only 7 were included in the search criteria of this study (Table 2). Notably, selected reports showed the concentration of TNF-α comprises 6/7 studies, following IL-6, IL-1β and IFN-γ with 2/7 studies, and only 1/7 of the retrieved reports measured the concentration of IL-10, IL-1Ra, CXCL8/IL-8, CCL2/MCP-1 and CCL3/MIP-1α. Reports showing the concentration of IL-2, IL-1Ra, CCL4/MIP-1β and G-CSF in CSF of human patients during PM or MM were not observed in this literature screening. TNF-α howed a contradictory result in the different studies, 2/6 of them demonstrated elevated levels of TNF-α during meningitis caused by S. pneumoniae, while 4/6 demonstrated the highest levels during NM [17,21-26]. In the two reports that IFN-γ was measured, the values were significantly higher in meningitis caused by S. pneumoniae than by N. meningitides[23,25]. Mastroianni et al. [17] observed similar levels of CXCL8/IL-8 and CCL3/MIP-1α in meningitis caused by both studied pathogens, although CCL2/MCP-1 was higher in patients with NM. The cytokine IL-6 levels were observed in two studies, but they were controversial and not conclusive, due to the small number of patients included in each study [21,24].

Table 2.

Comparative literature screening of cytokine measurements in CSF from pneumococcal and meningococcal meningitis patients

IL-1β TNF-α IL-6 IFN -γ IL-10 MIP-1α MCP-1 IL-8 References
S.p
N.m.
S.p.
N.m.
S.p.
N.m.
S.p.
N.m.
S.p.
N.m.
S.p.
N.m.
S.p.
N.m.
S.p.
N.m.
 
2988 (3)
268 (3)
4238 (3)
57 (3)
 
 
2.5 (u/ml) (3)
<0.1 (u/ml) (3)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
[25]
320 (10)
300 (18)
450 (10)
500 (18)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
[26]
 
 
584 (14)
2827 (7)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
[22]
 
 
2324 (6)
414 (13)
 
 
100% (6)
46% (13)
736 (6)
654 (13)
 
 
 
 
 
 
[23]
 
 
140 (2)
2007 (1)
8225 (4)
4500 (1)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
[21]
 
 
23.69 (2)
86 (4)
9.36 (2)
44.8 (4)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
[24]
                    23 (7) 25 (5) 3145 (7) 4604 (5) 4454 (7) 4525 (5) [17]

S.p. Streptococcus pneumonia, N.m. Neisseria meningitides, Values without units are in pg/mL. Parenthesis shows the number of patients included in each study.

Almost all studies showed elevated cyto/chemokine concentrations in BM patients when compared with healthy subjects. The works included a variety of patients of different ages, 4/7 studies showed cytokines levels in infants, children and adolescents [21,23-25], while 2/7 included only adult patients [22,26] and 1/7 studies included both children and adults [17]. The amount of patients included in each study was distinct, in 4 of 7 studies the range was 1 to 12 individuals for both pathogens [17,23,26], while 3/7 had from 19 to 28 individual for both pathogens [17,18,21]. Only one study described the presence of neurological sequelae, including hearing loss and cerebral atrophy, relating to the pathogen [25]. Data of IL-1β, IL-6, TNF-α, IFN-γ, IL-10, CXCL8/IL-8, CCL2/MCP-1 and CCL3/MIP-1α concentrations were measured from CSF patients using only two types of techniques, ELISA (5/7) and immunoradiometric assays (2/7).

Discussion

Different experimental approaches have been used to analyze the expression levels of the immune modulators, such as microarray and ELISA assays. In general, studies have mainly focused on the comparison of BM and meningitis caused by other infectious agents such as viruses and fungi, using healthy individuals as control [27,28]. However, the comparative analysis in relation to the levels of cytokines expressed during PM and MM has been little explored. The literature screening revealed the need of more comparative studies, in particular for cyto/chemokines poorly studied in BM patients, such as IL-10, CXCL8/IL-8, CCL3/MIP-1α and CCL2/MCP-1. To our knowledge, our work is the first to assess the levels of cytokines IL-2, IL-1Ra, CCL4/MIP-1β and G-CSF in patients with PM and MM. In contrast, some cytokines have been well characterized in BM such as IL-1β, TNF-α and IL-6, which have received more attention in the majority of the studies. In general, a limited profile of cytokine expression from the two major meningitis-pathogens was observed in each study. The use of the multiplex method in our work allowed the comparison between patients with PM and MN with a broader spectrum of cytokines analyzed simultaneously.

In all analyzed studies, including ours, some limitations are observed. Among these, the small number of patients and a lack of correlation between cytokines levels and symptoms of the disease and its sequelae after treatment, which may be related to some aspects of BM. Collection of CSF is an invasive procedure, therefore obtaining the samples is usually associated with routine diagnosis of the disease, which generally only occurs in emergency situations. In addition, poor hospital conditions in the public health system of developing countries, where BM cases occur more frequently, make it difficult access to patients’ clinical data.

TNF-α is one of the most studied cytokine during BM and has been identified as a useful complementary tool to improve the diagnosis of meningitis, especially in cases where the CSF examination is inconclusive. Although this cytokine seems to be important in driving several mechanisms underlying the immune response, our experimental data and the literature screening showed that this cytokine is not differentially expressed during meningitis caused by S. pneumoniae or N. meningitidis[22,24,27]. However, in relation to the time of LP, in the group <48 h we observed that the TNF-α levels are significantly elevated in CSF of patients with MM, but the same result is not repeated when LP was performed after 48 h from onset of symptoms. This data suggest a rapid decline of TNF-α during MM. This observation is in agreement with previous works. Van Deuren et al. [29] analyzed the kinetics of the TNF-α release in the animal models of meningococcal disease and sepsis and observed that TNF-a reached the maximal level in 1–2 h after LPS injection, becoming undetectable after 18–24 h. In human patients, the highest level of TNF-α can be detectable in the first 48 h of disease onset, decreasing after this period, which suggest that after a proinflammatory state, a down regulation of TNF-α production may represent a transition to an anti‒inflammatory state as a protective mechanism [30-32].

The IL-6 levels are also elevated during BM and some researchers have tried to associate this with TNF-α for the differential diagnosis of BM, but without success until now. Dulkerian et al. [21] and Mukai et al. [24] observed high levels of IL-6 during BM without differences between PM and MM. Other cytokines or chemokines, such as IL-1β, IL-10, CXCL8/IL-8, CCL3/MIP-1α and CCL2/MCP-1 did not demonstrate any significant difference between pathogens [17,23,26,27]. Corroborating with these authors, our measurements also did not show differences between pathogens for these cytokines.

It is plausible that additional factors can lead to differences in the cytokine expression, such as the type of the pathogen strain, the host’s age and the time of the LP after infection (as it was observed in our data). Strains of N. meningitidis seem to be able to induce different cytokine profiles [33,34]. Considering the age of the patients, Sharief et al. [26] observed that concentrations of TNF-α and IL-1β in CSF of patients with bacterial meningitis were not age-dependent. Additionally, Dulkerian et al. [21] demonstrates that neonates and young infants respond to pathogen invasion with the release of cytokines at comparable levels to those found in older children and adolescents. Similarly in our study, age-related differences were not observed (data not shown). However, in relation to the time of LP, we observed some differences between the pathogens. The MM patients seem to have a decay of cytokine (such as TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-10, MIP-1α, MIP-1β and G-CSF) levels faster than patients with PM, since decreased levels of certain cytokines were observed in the group >48 h.

IFN-γ was the unique protein that showed higher concentration in patients with PM compared with MM independent of the time of the LP. Kornelisse et al. [23] observed that IFN-γ was significantly higher in patients with PM than in children with meningitis caused by H. influenza or N. meningitidis and obtained data suggesting that the production of IFN-γ in the CSF from patients with bacterial meningitis is induced by IL-12, with TNF-α as a co-stimulator. The high IFN-γ production in monocytes culture seems to be mainly attributed to Gram-positive bacteria, which induce much more IL-12 than Gram-negative bacteria [35].

IFN-γ is involved in the stimulation of non-specific defense mechanisms of macrophages and polymorphonuclear leukocytes, such as phagocytosis and secretion of reactive oxygen intermediates [36]. Furthermore, our data also showed that IL-2 seems to be more pronounced in PM than in MM. The highest expression of IFN-γ and IL-2 during PM suggests the occurrence of a Th1 immune response [37]. In fact, TH1 and TH17 response were observed in a co-culture model of human monocytes and CD4+T cells stimulated with S. pneumoniae[38].

The difference in the degree of immune response observed during pneumococcal infection may be related to the best or worst outcome of the disease [39]. A deeper understanding of the immune response pathways against each pathogen, such as the type of Th response, can help to develop adjunctive immunotherapy using Th-polarized cytokines to increase host defense and accelerate healing of the pathogen.

Patients with PM, even with significantly lower numbers of WBC as demonstrated in Table 1, possess cyto/chemokines concentration at the same levels of patients with MM. Normalized concentrations of inflammatory mediators by cell count suggest a higher degree of activation on a cellular level, mainly during meningitis caused by S. pneumoniae (Figure 4). The difference in the IFN-γ concentration can be reflected in the potential of cells to release inflammatory cytokines, or this mediator can work as a signal to regulate invading leukocytes during BM [40].

The high immunogenicity of S. pneumoniae caused by cell components, e.g., pneumolysin, lipoteichoic acid and nucleic acids, can be responsible to release an elevated amount of cytokines per cell number [41,42]. Moreover, anti-inflammatory cytokines such as, IL-1Ra and IL-10 demonstrated the highest values to this index of cell activation. These inflammatory modulators could be blocking the recruitment of other cells. Although IL-8 and MCP-1 are important to attract phagocytic cells and have been detected at similar levels in both pathogens, the number of cells was significantly higher during MM than PM. Some studies have shown that IL-8 from human and rabbits is not able to induce pleocytosis [43,44]. In addition, pleocytosis has not been shown to be directly correlated to a specific chemokine, but can be correlated to the shift of the type of invading leukocyte [17,40,45]. No correlation between the chemokines IL-8, MCP-1 and MIP-1α levels and the total number of leucocytes in the CSF during BM was found. Even when separately comparing either CSF concentrations of IL-8 with neutrophil counts, or MCP-1 and MIP-1α with mononuclear cells in the CSF, no correlation was observed [17].

Even though the amount of cytokines and chemokines by cell counts differ between pathogens, the overall profile of these mediators in the CNS seems to be very similar. However, based on the IFN-γ, TNF-α and IL-2 found in this study, S. pneumoniae can trigger a Th1 response, differing from N. meningitidis in this aspect, which needs to be better investigated. This information about T helper response may also facilitate the design of meningitis vaccines based on cell-mediated immunity and provide new approaches based on the susceptibility of each patient to the disease.

BM outcome is correlated with severity of the inflammatory response in the subarachnoid space, thus, it is clear the importance of steroid therapy during BM. However, the benefit of adjunctive dexamethasone for all or any subgroup of patients with bacterial meningitis remains unproven [20,46]. Considering the data on cytokine levels, no changes in the regimen of dexamethasone for PM or MM would be need. However, different pathogens seem trigger a heterogeinity of type and degree of immune response, thus, advances in the pathogen-specific anti-inflammatory therapy are needed in order to better prognosis for BM patients.

Conclusions

In this work, the basic knowledge of the expression of several cyto/chemokines during PM and MM was increased. The modulation of cytokine levels in meningitis of diverse bacterial etiologies may be a useful strategy to improve the outcome in terms of morbidity and mortality. However, other inflammatory proteins that could play important roles in the steps of immune response were not included in the present study. In the future, more systematic studies containing a greater number of individuals, expanding ranges of cytokines and associating with time, sequels and the outcome of meningitis disease should be done to contribute to a more detailed understanding of the pathogenesis underlying meningitis.

Abbreviations

BM: Bacterial meningitis; CSF: Cerebrospinal fluid; PM: Pneumococcal meningitis; MM: Meningococcal meningitis; WBC: White blood cell count; LP: Lumbar puncture; CNS: Central nervous system; PMN: Polymorphonuclear granulocytes; IL: Interleukin; CXCL: Chemokine (c-x-c motif) Ligand; MCP: Monocyte Chemotactic Protein; CCL: Chemokine (C-C motif) Ligand; MIP: Macrophage Inflammatory Protein; TNF-α: Tumour Necrosis Factor-alpha; IFN-γ: Interferon-gamma; G-CSF: Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ contributions

LC performed the experiments, analyzed the data, and drafted the manuscript. DG aided in performing the experiments. SL designed the study and revised the manuscript. LA designed the study, analyzed the data, and revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Pre-publication history

The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:

http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2334/13/326/prepub

Contributor Information

Leonam G Coutinho, Email: leonam_manoel@yahoo.com.

Denis Grandgirard, Email: denis.grandgirard@ifik.unibe.ch.

Stephen L Leib, Email: stephen.leib@ifik.unibe.ch.

Lucymara F Agnez-Lima, Email: lfagnez@ufrnet.br.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by UBS Optimus Foundation and CNPq. We would like to thank the team of Hospital Giselda Trigueiro for their help with the sample collected. The authors LGC and LFAL are grateful to CNPq (Brazil) for the fellowships.

References

  1. Schuchat A, Robinson K, Wenger JD, Harrison LH, Farley M, Reingold AL, Lefkowitz L, Perkins BA. Bacterial meningitis in the United States in 1995. N Engl J Med. 1997;337:970–9762. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199710023371404. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Silva WA, Pinheiro AM, Coutinho LG, Marinho LA, Lima LF. Epidemiological profile of acute bacterial meningitis in the state of Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop. 2010;43:455–457. doi: 10.1590/s0037-86822010000400023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Novaes HM, Sartori AM, Soárez PC. Hospitalization rates for pneumococcal disease in Brazil, 2004–2006. Rev Saude Publica. 2011;45:539–547. doi: 10.1590/s0034-89102011005000028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Sáfadi MA, Cintra OA. Epidemiology of meningococcal disease in Latin America, current situation and opportunities for prevention. Neurol Res. 2010;32:263–271. doi: 10.1179/016164110X12644252260754. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Tauber MG, Moser B. Cytokines and chemokines in meningeal inflammation, biology and clinical implications. Clin Infect Dis. 1999;28:1–11. doi: 10.1086/515079. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. van Furth AM, Roord JJ, van Furth R. Roles of proinflammatory and anti-inflammatory cytokines in pathophysiology of bacterial meningitis and effect of adjunctive therapy. InfectImmun. 1996;64:4883–4890. doi: 10.1128/iai.64.12.4883-4890.1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Brandt CT, Caye-Thomasen P, Lund SP, Worsoe L, Ostergaard C, Frimodt-Moller N, Espersen F, Thomsen J, Lundgren JD. Hearing loss and cochlear damage in experimental pneumococcal meningitis, with special reference to the role of neutrophil granulocytes. Neurobiol Dis. 2006;23:300–311. doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2006.03.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Haberl RL, Anneser F, Kodel U, Pfister HW. Is nitric oxide involved as a mediator of cerebrovascular changes in the early phase of experimental pneumococcal meningitis? NeurolRes. 1994;16:108–112. doi: 10.1080/01616412.1994.11740205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Leppert D, Leib SL, Grygar C, Miller KM, Schaad UB, Hollander GA. Matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-8 and MMP-9 in cerebrospinal fluid during bacterial meningitis, association with blood–brain barrier damage and neurological sequelae. ClinInfect Dis. 2000;31:80–84. doi: 10.1086/313922. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Zwijnenburg PJ, de Bie HM, Roord JJ, van der Poll T, van Furth AM. Chemotactic activity of CXCL5 in cerebrospinal fluid of children with bacterial meningitis. J Neuroimmunol. 2003;145:148–153. doi: 10.1016/j.jneuroim.2003.09.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Azuma H, Tsuda N, Sasaki K, Okuno A. Clinical significance of cytokine measurement for detection of meningitis. J Pediatr. 1997;131:463–465. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(97)80079-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Klein M, Obermaier B, Angele B, Pfister HW, Wagner H, Koedel U, Kirschning CJ. Innate immunity to pneumococcal infection of the central nervous system depends on toll-like receptor (TLR) 2 and TLR4. J Infect Dis. 2008;198:1028–1036. doi: 10.1086/591626. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Mogensen TH, Paludan SR, Kilian M, Ostergaard L. Live Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae, and Neisseria meningitidis activate the inflammatory response through Toll-like receptors 2, 4, and 9 in species-specific patterns. J Leukocyte Biol. 2006;80:267–277. doi: 10.1189/jlb.1105626. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Ribes S, Ebert S, Regen T, Agarwal A, Tauber SC, Czesnik D, Spreer A, Bunkowski S, Eiffert H, Hanisch UK, Hammerschmidt S, Nau R. Toll-like receptor stimulation enhances phagocytosis and intracellular killing of nonencapsulated and encapsulated Streptococcus pneumoniae by murine microglia. Infect Immun. 2010;78:865–871. doi: 10.1128/IAI.01110-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Sjolinder H, Mogensen TH, Kilian M, Jonsson AB, Paludan SR. Important role for Toll-like receptor 9 in host defense against meningococcal sepsis. InfectImmun. 2008;76:5421–5428. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00615-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Kastenbauer S, Koedel U, Becker BF, Pfister HW. Oxidative stress in bacterial meningitis in humans. Neurology. 2002;58:186–191. doi: 10.1212/wnl.58.2.186. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Mastroianni CM, Lancella L, Mengoni F, Lichtner M, Santopadre P, D’Agostino C, Ticca F, Vullo V. Chemokine profiles in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) during the course of pyogenic and tuberculous meningitis. Clin Exp Immunol. 1998;114:210–214. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2249.1998.00698.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. de Jonge RC, van Furth AM, Wassenaar M, Gemke RJ, Terwee CB. Predicting sequelae and death after bacterial meningitis in childhood, a systematic review of prognostic studies. BMC Infect Dis. 2010;10:232. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-10-232. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Worsøe L, Cayé-Thomasen P, Brandt CT, Thomsen J, Østergaard C. Factors associated with the occurrence of hearing loss after pneumococcal meningitis. Clin Infect Dis. 2010;51:917–924. doi: 10.1086/656409. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Borchorst S, Møller K. The role of dexamethasone in the treatment of bacterial meningitis - a systematic review. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2012;56:1210–1221. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2012.02698.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Dulkerian SJ, Kilpatrick L, Costarino AT Jr, McCawley L, Fein J, Corcoran L, Zirin S, Harris MC. Cytokine elevations in infants with bacterial and aseptic meningitis. J Pediatr. 1995;126:872–876. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(95)70199-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Glimaker M, Kragsbjerg P, Forsgren M, Olcen P. Tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF alpha) in cerebrospinal fluid from patients with meningitis of different etiologies, high levels of TNF alpha indicate bacterial meningitis. J Infect Dis. 1993;167:882–889. doi: 10.1093/infdis/167.4.882. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Kornelisse RF, Hack CE, Savelkoul HF, van der Pouw Kraan TC, Hop WC, van Mierlo G, Suur MH, Neijens HJ, de Groot R. Intrathecal production of interleukin-12 and gamma interferon in patients with bacterial meningitis. Infect Immun. 1997;65:877–881. doi: 10.1128/iai.65.3.877-881.1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Mukai AO, Krebs VL, Bertoli CJ, Okay TS. TNF-alpha and IL-6 in the diagnosis of bacterial and aseptic meningitis in children. Pediatr Neurol. 2006;34:25–29. doi: 10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2005.06.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Ohga S, Aoki T, Okada K, Akeda H, Fujioka K, Ohshima A, Mori T, Minamishima I, Ueda K. Cerebrospinal fluid concentrations of interleukin-1 beta, tumour necrosis factor-alpha, and interferon gamma in bacterial meningitis. Arch Dis Child. 1994;70:123–125. doi: 10.1136/adc.70.2.123. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Sharief MK, Ciardi M, Thompson EJ. Blood–brain barrier damage in patients with bacterial meningitis, association with tumor necrosis factor-alpha but not interleukin-1 beta. J Infect Dis. 1992;166:350–358. doi: 10.1093/infdis/166.2.350. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Akalin H, Akdis AC, Mistik R, Helvaci S, Kilicturgay K. Cerebrospinal fluid interleukin-1 beta/interleukin-1 receptor antagonist balance and tumor necrosis factor-alpha concentrations in tuberculous, viral and acute bacterial meningitis. Scand J Infect Dis. 1994;26:667–674. doi: 10.3109/00365549409008634. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Friedland JS, Shattock R, Remick DG, Griffin GE. Mycobacterial 65-kD heat shock protein induces release of proinflammatory cytokines from human monocytic cells. Clin Exp Immunol. 1993;91:58–62. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2249.1993.tb03354.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. van Deuren M, Netea MG, Hijmans A, Demacker PN, Neeleman C, Sauerwein RW, Bartelink AK, van der Meer JW. Posttranscriptional down-regulation of tumour necrosis factor-alpha and interleukin-1beta production in acute meningococcal infections. J Infect Dis. 1998;177:1401–1405. doi: 10.1086/517824. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Marzouk O. Clinical and laboratory aspects of meningococcal disease in childhood. MD Thesis: Liverpool University; 1994. [Google Scholar]
  31. van Deuren M, van der Ven-Jongekrijg J, Demacker PN, Bartelink AK, van Dalen R, Sauerwein RW, Gallati H, Vannice JL, van der Meer JW. Differential expression of proinflammatory cytokines and their inhibitors during the course of meningococcal infections. J Infect Dis. 1994;169:157–161. doi: 10.1093/infdis/169.1.157. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Baines PB, Hart CA. Severe meningococcal disease in childhood. Br J Anaesth. 2003;90:72–83. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Davenport V, Groves E, Hobbs CG, Williams NA, Heyderman RS. Regulation of Th-1 T cell-dominated immunity to Neisseria meningitidis within the human mucosa. Cell Microbiol. 2007;9:1050–1061. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2006.00851.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Holub M, Scheinostova M, Dzupova O, Fiserova A, Beran O, Kalmusova J, Musilek M, Krizova P. Neisseria meningitidis strains from patients with invasive meningococcal disease differ in stimulation of cytokine production. Folia Microbiol. 2007;52:525–528. doi: 10.1007/BF02932114. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Hessle C, Andersson B, WoldA E. Gram-positive bacteria are potent inducers of monocytic interleukin-12 (IL-12) while gram-negative bacteria preferentially stimulate IL-10 production. Infect Immun. 2000;68:3581–3586. doi: 10.1128/iai.68.6.3581-3586.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Borish LC, Steinke JW. 2. Cytokines and chemokines. J Allerg ClinImmun. 2003;111:S460–S475. doi: 10.1067/mai.2003.108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. D’Elios MM, Benagiano M, Della Bella C, Amedei A. T-cell response to bacterial agents. J Infect Dev C tries. 2011;5:640–645. doi: 10.3855/jidc.2019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Olliver M, Hiew J, Mellroth P, Henriques-Normark B, Bergman P. Human monocytes promote Th1 and Th17 responses to Streptococcus pneumoniae. Infect Immun. 2011;79:4210–4217. doi: 10.1128/IAI.05286-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Fortnum HM. Hearing impairment after bacterial meningitis, a review. Arch Dis Child. 1992;67:1128–1133. doi: 10.1136/adc.67.9.1128. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Hausler KG, Prinz M, Nolte C, Weber JR, Schumann RR, Kettenmann H, Hanisch UK. Interferon-gamma differentially modulates the release of cytokines and chemokines in lipopolysaccharide- and pneumococcal cell wall-stimulated mouse microglia and macrophages. Eur J Neurosc. 2002;16:2113–2122. doi: 10.1046/j.1460-9568.2002.02287.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Deshmukh SD, Kremer B, Freudenberg M, Bauer S, Golenbock DT, Henneke P. Macrophages recognize streptococci through bacterial single-stranded RNA. EMBO Rep. 2010;12:71–76. doi: 10.1038/embor.2010.189. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Carrol ED, Guiver M, Nkhoma S, Mankhambo LA, Marsh J, Balmer P, Banda DL, Jeffers G, White SA, Molyneux EM, Molyneux ME, Smyth RL, Hart CA. High pneumococcal DNA loads are associated with mortality in Malawian children with invasive pneumococcal disease. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2007;26:416–422. doi: 10.1097/01.inf.0000260253.22994.61. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Dumont RA, Car BD, Voitenok NN, Junker U, Moser B, Zak O, O’Reilly T. Systemic neutralization of interleukin-8 markedly reduces neutrophilic pleocytosis during experimental lipopolysaccharide-induced meningitis in rabbits. Infect Immun. 2000;68:5756–5763. doi: 10.1128/iai.68.10.5756-5763.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Ostergaard C, Yieng-Kow RV, Larsen CG, Mukaida N, Matsushima K, Benfield T, Frimodt-Moller N, Espersen F, Kharazmi A, Lundgren JD. Treatment with a monocolonal antibody to IL-8 attenuates the pleocytosis in experimental pneumococcal meningitis in rabbits when given intravenously, but not intracisternally. Clin Exp Immunol. 2000;122:207–211. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2249.2000.01357.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Diab A, Abdalla H, Li HL, Shi FD, Zhu J, Hojberg B, Lindquist L, Wretlind B, Bakhiet M, Link H. Neutralization of macrophage inflammatory protein 2 (MIP-2) and MIP-1alpha attenuates neutrophil recruitment in the central nervous system during experimental bacterial meningitis. Infect Immun. 1999;67:2590–2601. doi: 10.1128/iai.67.5.2590-2601.1999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. van de Beek D, Farrar JJ, de Gans J, Mai NT, Molyneux EM, Peltola H, Peto TE, Roine I, Scarborough M, Schultsz C, Thwaites GE, Tuan PQ, Zwinderman AH. Adjunctive dexamethasone in bacterial meningitis, a meta-analysis of individual patient data. Lancet Neurol. 2010;9:254–263. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(10)70023-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from BMC Infectious Diseases are provided here courtesy of BMC

RESOURCES