Skip to main content
Translational Behavioral Medicine logoLink to Translational Behavioral Medicine
editorial
. 2012 May 23;2(2):159–162. doi: 10.1007/s13142-012-0129-4

Changing behavior throughout the life-course: Translating the success of aging research

Marcia G Ory 1, Matthew Lee Smith 2,3,, Barbara Resnick 4
PMCID: PMC3717898  PMID: 24073108

Despite the plethora of evidence-based guidelines for improving health and quality of life across the life-course [1, 2], less is known about the translation of evidence-based programs specifically serving older adults. This is partially attributed to the recalcitrant belief that older adults—especially the oldest old—are frail and set in their ways, and thus not proper targets for behavioral medicine interventions [3]. Such beliefs are slowly being countered by the expanding body of research about aging and behavior, which demonstrates the resilience of older adults [4] and the positive impact of health promotion/disease prevention intervention efforts on this subgroup of the population [5, 6]. Secondly, there has been a general lag in translational research, which is documented by several eloquent reviews about the barriers associated with translating research into practice [79].

Fig 1.

Fig 1

A life-course perspective on translational behavioral medicine research

Amid the rapid aging of the worldwide population [10], there is growing recognition of the need to fundamentally shift our thinking about aging from a societal problem to an opportunity for advancing knowledge about strategies for promoting health in later life. Moreover, helping the large number of baby boomers age optimally and successfully is critical to managing skyrocketing health care costs [11]. Fortunately, efforts to close the gap between research and practice are being heeded by behavioral medicine researchers and practitioners. This call to action has resulted in a greater understanding of the role evidence-based behavioral medicine can play in designing effective interventions that can be brought “to scale,” maintain positive benefits over time, and be sustained by existing community and clinical infrastructures [12, 13].

This special section on “Aging and Behavior: Translating Evidence-Based Interventions into Policy and Practice” provides a much-needed critical focus on how to translate and disseminate evidence-based programs, interventions, and guidelines designed for aging adults across the care continuum and in real-world settings. Toward this goal, we offer a conceptual schema illustrating the essential components in understanding a life-course perspective to translational behavioral medicine research.

Not only does the social and environmental context influence basic risk factors and intervention research for the aging population, it also sets a framework for understanding translational research efforts and how these “play out” across different settings and life-course transitions. The overall goal of a life-course perspective on translational behavioral medicine research is to emphasize that each life transition presents a unique opportunity for interventions to inform policy and practice that can improve health and quality of life. Given the relative lack of translational research about later life issues, despite the fact that there will be more octogenarians, nonagenarians, and centenarians in the decades to come, this special section focuses on what is known and what still needs to be learned about behavior change in the second 50 years. The articles in this section reflect several common themes in aging and behavior research [14] that are critical for understanding the challenges associated with translational intervention efforts and guide us to consider important factors when promoting behavior change:

  • The aging population is heterogeneous in terms of demographic characteristics (e.g., race/ethnicity, gender, education, and geographic location); health factors (e.g., functional status and comorbidities including cognitive and mental health); and psychosocial factors that often are mediators to programmatic success (e.g., resilience, self-efficacy, and social support).

  • Health is malleable and behavior change is a lifelong process that can prevent or slow down the deleterious effects of age-related diseases and disabilities.

  • There are opportunities for planned and natural interventions at every point in the life course, and especially around life transitions.

  • It is important to understand the context in which aging adults live, seek health care, and participate in spiritual and recreational activities.

  • This context is essential to understanding the clinical, workplace, and community delivery infrastructures needed for bringing evidence-based programs to scale and sustaining them over time.

The systematic review, original articles, case studies, practice guidelines, and tool reports also shed light on key translational research issues related to program dissemination and sustainability of programs designed to improve the health and functioning of aging adults with chronic conditions and illnesses. Despite the call for more multiple behavioral intervention programs and multilevel interventions [1517], the current science base is still characterized by “single behavior change interventions” primarily focused at the individual or interpersonal level [16]. Although multilevel interventions that reflect a social–ecological approach are being widely promoted [15, 18], for widespread adoption into the intervention armamentarium, dedicated research support is needed to advance the conceptualization, measurement, and implementation of multilevel approaches [19].

While both internal and external validity are important in translational research, translational research differs from efficacy studies which focus more on internal validity. In contrast, translational research focuses equally, if not more so, on external validity to assure the ability to translate findings to other settings [8]. There is always a delicate balance between program adaptation and fidelity, but tailoring to specific populations and settings is essential for widespread adoption [20]. Whereas initial research studies are often restricted to one or two sites which are organizationally similar, translational research and practice recognizes the importance of multiple delivery sites with a menu of options that can support consumer demand and preference [21]. Furthermore, creative academic and commercial partnerships can be utilized to further dissemination of evidence-based programs [22]. Future research efforts are needed to better identify minimal intervention dosages that harmonize administrative capacity with the maintenance of essential evidence-based intervention. The promotion of translational research can be self-sustaining as organizations in the public health and aging services network continue to value and choose evidence-based programs [23]. This is particularly important as translational research is geared toward long-term sustainability and must fit with, or be altered to fit with, the setting in which it occurs [24].

Despite the substantial investment in clinical guidelines, these are often not fully adopted in practice given the plethora of guidelines and competing demands. Guidelines for averting falls in long-term care facilities have the potential for sustained uptake, especially when accompanied by strong institutional and professional backing [2527]. When implementing general public health guidelines such as those related to physical activity, the availability and free access to practical tools, such as the Exercise and Screening for You, provide a critical first step to the dissemination of information to all older adults [28, 29]. Moving from research to real-life settings often requires easy-to-use tools as also demonstrated by the value of creating an evidence-based consumer-friendly caregiving tool kit for helping practitioners teach families to manage caregiving stresses associated with Alzheimer’s disease [30].

Sustainability is possible [3134] but often difficult especially for grant-funded programs. Institutional buy-in, community leadership, and opportunities for booster sessions can help sustain programmatic efforts as well as the benefits participants receive from the intervention [35, 36]. Behavioral interventions can have longer staying power when embedded within a multi-interventional approach that has supporting evidence-based policy and environmental strategies.

The passage of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) [37] gives priority to addressing the health care implications of the ever-growing number of older adults in our country [38]. Although the ACA has generated much debate among the American public [39], it reflects a shift in the American health care system toward giving greater emphasis to the health and well-being of the aging population. Our health promotion goals for older adults, and our dedication to disseminating and translating effective behavior change interventions, are not focused on lengthening life or using mortality as an outcome. Rather, our goals in this work are to optimize the management of chronic illness and improve the years that aging adults can spend at their highest level of physical and cognitive function and ensure their optimal quality of life.

Policy initiatives such as Medicare, our major health care reimbursement system for older adults, are likewise moving in a direction that focuses on the promotion of health, the optimization of healthy behaviors, and the provision of important opportunities to translate health initiatives for aging adults. The Welcome to Medicare Visit and the more recent passage of the ongoing Wellness visits are timely examples of such initiatives. A patient is eligible for a wellness visit if she has been enrolled in Medicare for longer than 12 months and has not received a Welcome to Medicare visit in the past 12 months. These visits include basic medical history and screening with regard to preventive care practices; functional, cognitive, and psychosocial assessments; and the development of a plan of personalized health advice and referral as appropriate. This kind of policy initiative thus encourages health care providers to engage aging patients in community programs or activities in their sites of care or institutional living settings. Likewise, there is a growing movement toward environmentally based policies to build healthy communities for active aging that facilitate recommended physical activity by having safe bike paths, walking routes and green areas within communities, or pleasant outdoor areas to stimulate walking for institutionally based aging adults [40, 41]. Older adults themselves are helping to drive policy initiatives around creating more healthful food and physical environments [42].

This is an exciting time for translational research, and by working together policy makers, health care providers, behavioral researchers, and older adults can make it happen! Building off of national initiatives such as the NIH-funded Behavioral Change Consortium [15, 16] and the Health Maintenance Consortium [17], the papers in this issue of Translational Behavioral Medicine were compiled to provide the latest behavior and aging research, practice models of dissemination and sustainability, and easy-to-use tools for fostering behavioral translational research across the life-course. We hope this compilation provides you with a greater understanding of the current state of research and practice about changing behaviors throughout the life-course and encourages you to join in the translation of healthy behavior research to facilitate successful aging both professionally and personally.

References

  • 1.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The Community Guide. Retrieved January 12, 2012 from http://www.thecommunityguide.org/index.html
  • 2.Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF). Retrieved March 1, 2012 from http://www.ahrq.gov/clinic/uspstfix.htm
  • 3.Ory MG, Hoffman M, Hawkins M, Sanner B, Mockenhaupt R. Challenging aging stereotypes: Designing and evaluating physical activity programs. Am J Prev Med. 2003;25:164–171. doi: 10.1016/S0749-3797(03)00181-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Hochhalter AK, Smith ML, Ory MG. Sucessful aging and resiliance: Applications for public health and health care. In: Resnick B, Gwyther L, Roberto K, editors. Resilience in aging: Concepts, research and outcomes. New York, NY: Springer Publications; 2010. pp. 15–30. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. What works: A CDC compendium of effective community-based interventions from around the world. Retrieved April 22, 2009 from http://www.cdc.gov/ncipc/preventingfalls/CDCCompendium_030508.pdf
  • 6.National Council on the Aging. Issue Brief: Evidence-based Health Promotion Series. Using the evidence base to promote healthy aging (Vol. November 2006), 2006.
  • 7.Glasgow RE. Why don’t we see more translation of health promotion research to practice? Rethinking the efficacy-to-effectiveness transition. Am J Public Health. 2003;93:1261–1267. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.93.8.1261. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Glasgow RE, Emmons KM. How can we increase translation of research into practice? Types of evidence needed. Annu Rev Public Health. 2007;28:413–433. doi: 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.28.021406.144145. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Kessler R, Glasgow RE. A proposal to speed translation of healthcare research into practice: Dramatic change is needed. Am J Prev Med. 2011;40:637–644. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2011.02.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.U. S. Census Bureau: Federal interagency forum on aging related statistics. Older Americans 2008: Key indicators of well-being. 2008.
  • 11.Walker DM. Long-term care: Aging baby boom generation will increase demand and burden on federal and state budgets. Washington, DC: United States General Accounting Office; 2002. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Davidson KW, Goldstein M, Kaplan RM, et al. Evidence-based behavioral medicine: what is it and how do we achieve it? Ann Behav Med. 2003;26:161–171. doi: 10.1207/S15324796ABM2603_01. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Spring B, Pagoto S, Kaufmann PG, et al. Invitation to a dialogue between researchers and clinicians about evidence-based behavioral medicine. Ann Behav Med. 2005;30:125–137. doi: 10.1207/s15324796abm3002_5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Ory MG, Abeles RP, Lipman PD. Overview of aging, health and behavior. In: Ory MG, Lipman RP, Lipman PD, editors. Aging, health and behavior. Berkeley, CA: Sage; 1992. pp. 1–23. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Ory MG, Jordan PJ, Bazzarre T. The Behavior Change Consortium: Setting the stage for a new century of health behavior-change research. Health Educ Res. 2002;17:500–511. doi: 10.1093/her/17.5.500. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Nigg CR, Allegrante JP, Ory MG. Theory-comparison and multiple-behavior research: common themes advancing health behavior research. Health Educ Res. 2002;17:670–679. doi: 10.1093/her/17.5.670. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Nigg CR, Long CR. A systematic review of single health behavior change interventions versus multiple health behavior change interventions among older adults. Trans Behav Med Pract Pol Res. 2012, This Special Issue. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 18.Ory MG, Smith ML, Mier N, Wernicke MM. The science of sustaining health behavior change: the Health Maintenance Consortium. Am J Health Behav. 2010;34:647–659. doi: 10.5993/AJHB.34.6.2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.National Caner Institute. Background perspectives and description of 2011 conference and journal supplement. Retrieved January 12, 2012 from http://dccps.nci.nih.gov/mli/background-2011.pdf
  • 20.Toobert D, Glasgow RE, Strycker LA, Barrera M, King DK. Adapting and RE-AIMing a heart disease prevention program for older women with diabetes. Trans Behav Med Pract Pol Res. 2012, This Special Issue. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 21.Smith ML, Ory MG, Belza B, Altpeter M. Personal and delivery site characteristics associated with intervention dosage in an evidence-based fall risk reduction program for older adults. Transl Behav Med Prac Pol Res. 2012, This Special Issue. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 22.Dunn AL, Buller DB, Dearing JW, Cutter G, Guerra M, Wilcox S, Bettinghaus EP. Adopting an evidence-based lifestyle physical activity program: dissemination study design and methods. Transl Behav Med Pract Pol Res. 2012, This Special Issue. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 23.Desai PJ, Derananian C, Hughes S, Seymour R, Smith-Ray R. Perceived versus actual factors associated with adoption and maintenance of an evidence-based physical activity program. Transl Behav Med Pract Pol Res. 2012, This Special Issue. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 24.Rogers EM. Diffusion of innovations. 5. New York, NY: Free Press; 2003. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Resnick B, Simpson M. Implementing the falls clinical practice guidelines in long-term care: an exemplary model. Director. 2004;12:76–81. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.American Medical Directors Association: Clinical Practice Guideline (CPG): Falls and fall risk. Retrieved March 3, 2012 from http://www.amda.com/tools/cpg/falls.cfm.
  • 27.Vance J. The clinical practice guideline for falls and fall risk. Transl Behav Med Pract Pol Res. 2012, This Special Issue. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 28.Resnick B, Ory MG, Hora K, et al. The Exercise Assessment and Screeing for You (EASY) Tool: Application in the oldest old population. Am J Lifestyle Med. 2008;2:432–440. doi: 10.1177/1559827608320229. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Chodzko-Zajko, WJ, Resnick B, Ory MG. Beyond screening—assessing readiness for physical activity with the EASY tool. Transl Behav Med Pract Pol Res. 2012, This Special Issue. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 30.Stevens AB, Smith E, Trickett L, McGhee R. Implementing an evidence-based caregiver intervention within an integrated healthcare system. Transl Behav Med Pract Pol Res. 2012, This Special Issue. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 31.Estabrooks PA, Smith-Ray RL, Dzewaltowski DA, et al. Sustainability of evidence-based community-based physical activity programs for older adults: lessons from active for life. Transl Behav MedPract Pol Res. 2011;1:208–215. doi: 10.1007/s13142-011-0039-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Evashwick C, Ory MG. Factors essential to sustaining public health and aging programs over time. Generations. 2003;29:76–81. [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Scheirer M. Sustainability is possible! A review and commentary on empirical studies of sustainability. Am J Eval. 2005;26:320–347. doi: 10.1177/1098214005278752. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Scheirer MA, Dearing JW. An agenda for research on the sustainability of public health programs. Am J Public Health. 2011;101:2059–2067. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2011.300193. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Elliot DL, MacKinnon DP, Mabry L, Kisbu-Sakarya Y, Kuehl K, Moe EL, DeFranceso CA, Goldberg L, Favorite KC. Worksite wellness program implementation: a model of translational effectiveness. Transl Behav Med Pract Pol Res. 2012, This Special Issue. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 36.Michael K, Shaughnessy M, Resnick B. People Reducing Risk and Improving Strength through Exercise, Diet, and Drug Adherence (PRAISEDD): a case report on long-term community adoption. Transl Behav Med Pract Pol Res. 2012, This Special Issue. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 37.American Geriatrics Society Geriatrics Society, American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Panel on Falls Prevention: guideline for the prevention of falls in older persons. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2001;49:664–672. doi: 10.1046/j.1532-5415.2001.49115.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. United States Congress. United States of America: U.S. Government Printing Office, 2010, 124.
  • 39.Elmendorf DW. Response pertaining to the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA). In S.J. Sessions (Ed.). Washington, DC: Congressional Budget Office; 2010.
  • 40.Park CH, Malavasi L, Liles C, et al. National blueprint report: strategies for integrating physical activity into wellness programming for older adults. J Active Aging. 2008;7:66–75. [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Ory MG, Liles C, Lawler K. Building healthy communities for active aging: a national recognition program. Generations. 2009–2010, 33:82–84.
  • 42.Buman MP, Winter SJ, Baker C, Hekler EB, Otten JJ, King AC. Neighborhood Eating and Activity Advocacy Teams (NEAAT): engaging older adults in policy activities to improve food and physical activity environments. Transl Behav Med Pract Pol Res. 2012, This Special Issue. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]

Articles from Translational Behavioral Medicine are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES