Abstract
An efficient synthetic route to a series of substituted 2-aminopyrimidine (2-AP) derivatives has been developed. Subsequent biofilm screening has allowed comparison between the biological activity of these new derivatives and that of the 2-aminoimidazole class of anti-biofilm compounds. Several derivatives displayed the ability to modulate bacterial biofilm formation, exhibiting greater activity against Gram-positive strains than Gram-negative strains. Additionally some 2-aminopyrmidines were able to suppress MRSA resistance to conventional antibiotics.
Antibiotic resistance has become one of the most pressing issues in biomedical science. The ability to exert control over bacterial life processes that contribute to pathogenesis and drug resistance, such as biofilm formation, is one promising route toward dealing with infections that stem from multidrug resistant (MDR) bacteria. A bacterial biofilm can be defined as a surface accreted community of bacteria that are encased in an extracellular matrix.1 Once in the biofilm state, bacteria become significantly more resilient to conventional antimicrobial treatments. In some cases bacteria within a biofilm are 1000 times more resistant to antibiotic therapies than their planktonic counterparts.2 It is estimated that 80% of all bacterial infections are biofilm mediated.3 Biofilms are thought to be responsible for the chronic infections of indwelling medical devices,4,5 degenerative tooth decay via plaque formation, as well as the mortality and morbidity of cystic fibrosis patients.6,7
Despite the widespread problems caused by biofilms, there exist few small molecule scaffolds capable of modulating the biofilm life cycle.8 These scaffolds include homoserine lactones,9 brominated furanones,10,11 phenethyl-carbamates,12,13 and flustramine derivatives.14 One of the most successful classes of biofilm modulators has been the 2-aminoimidazole (2-AI) class based on the marine natural products oroidin and bromoageliferin.15–22 The next logical heterocycle to investigate in an effort to identify novel biofilm modulating scaffolds was the 2-aminopyrimidine (2-AP, Figure 1). The replacement of a hydrogen bond donor (N-H) with a hydrogen bond acceptor C=N) allows us to probe the importance of this hydrogen bonding site in the context of biofilm modulation. The 2-AP ring is of similar size to the 2-AI ring, with only a one carbon homologation between the two heterocycles. Many 2-aminopyrimidine analogues exhibit a host of interesting biological functions.23,24 One series of analogues, the imidazo[1,2-a]pyrimidinium salts, have been shown to inhibit biofilm formation of both Salmonella typhimurium and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, however it is hypothesized that these compounds are cleaved in vivo to the corresponding 2-aminoimidazole.25 Therefore, to explore the potential for 2-aminopyrimidine derivatives themselves to serve as biofilm modulators, we were interested in testing 2-aminopyrimidine analogues that could not be cleaved in vivo to the corresponding 2-aminoimidazole derivative.
Figure 1.
Comparison of H-bond donor/acceptor profiles between generic 2-AI and 2-AP rings.
Due to the success of derivatives 1, a class of 2-aminopyrimidine amides 2 and 3 were envisioned to test the hypothesis that suitably functionalized 2-aminopyrimidines could also modulate biofilm formation (Figure 2). The synthetic approach to access these compounds is outlined in Scheme 1. Standard Boc-protection of 2-amino-5-iodopyrimidine yielded di-Boc protected 2-amino-5-iodopyrimidine 4, which was coupled with various propargylic alkyne amides under standard Sonogashira coupling conditions. The resulting alkyne 2-aminopyrimidines were then deprotected (TFA/DCM) and subjected to counter ion exchange (Cl− for trifluoroacetate) to deliver 2-aminopyrimidines 9–12 for biological testing. The effect of side chain unsaturation was also investigated. The intermediate Boc-protected alkyne 2-aminopyrimidines were fully reduced via hydrogenation, which, following deprotection and counter ion exchange, delivered 2-aminopyrimidines 13–16.
Figure 2.
Evolution of the 2-aminopyrimidine class of biofilm modulators
With compounds 9–16 in hand, biological screening was undertaken against two representative Gram-negative bacterial strains (Acinetobacter baumannii and P. aeruginosa) and two distinct isolates of one representative Gram-positive bacteria: methicillin sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) and methicillin resistant S. aureus (MRSA). Each compound was screened at 200 µM for the ability to inhibit bacterial biofilm formation using the crystal violet reporter assay.26 The effect of 2-aminopyrimidine (2-AP) itself was also investigated. These results are summarized in Table 1.
Table 1.
Percent inhibition of biofilm formation at 200 µM
Cmpd | A. baumannii | P. aeruginosa | MSSA | MRSA |
---|---|---|---|---|
9 | 23.1±4.6a | 57. 4±22.0* | 58.8±7.7* | 72.9±24.4* |
10 | 40.4±5.2 | 52.5±11.0 | 83.9±8.4 | 80.1 ± 7.7 |
11 | 34.2±2.4 | 12.4±20.9* | 15.5±24.8* | 30.7±19.9 |
12 | 17.9±1.5 | 30.6±9.7* | 10.6±5.4* | 0.2±3.9 |
13 | 10.7±18.9 | 22.0±19.0* | 30.1±9.7* | 29.7±14.4* |
14 | 26.3±8.0 | 3.5±1.6 | 5.7±16.9 | 11.7 ± 9.4 |
15 | 33.1±5.2 | 4.9±12.5 | 30.2±7.9 | 85.5 ± 3.5 |
16 | 33.0±17.9 | 32.6±16.2* | 35.5±14.6* | 65.0±10.6* |
2-AP | 8.08±4.0 | 19.0±3.6* | 12.2±0.7 | 15.4± 7.2 |
± indicates one standard deviation;
indicates biofilm promotion
The data revealed that compounds 10 and 15 are the most active compounds from this initial class of 2-aminopyrimidine amides. Compounds 10 and 15 were able to inhibit MRSA biofilm formation by 80.1% and 85.5% respectively at 200 µM. 2-Aminopyrimidine 10 was also able to inhibit MSSA biofilm formation by 83.9%, while 15showed only marginal activity. Compound 10 was able to inhibit 52.5 %P. aeruginosa biofilm formation, while 15 was ineffective at 200 µM. None of the 2-aminopyrimidines inhibited A. baumannii biofilm formation substantially, with the most active compound 10, showing only 40.4% inhibition at 200 µM. As expected, 2-aminopyrimidine itself showed no noteworthy biofilm inhibition activity at 200 µM against the four strains tested.
Both 10 and 15 were then subjected to dose-response studies in an attempt to determine their IC50 values (concentration at which 50% of the biofilm formation is inhibited). Compound 10 displayed IC50 values of 200 µM, 128 µM, and 84 µM against P. aeruginosa, MSSA, and MRSA, respectively (Table 2). Compound 15 returned IC50 values of 344 µM and 72 µM against MSSA and MRSA, respectively (Table 2). Growth curve analysis was then performed at the IC50 concentrations of 10 and 15 to assess the effect on planktonic cell growth. The discovery of novel non-toxic biofilm modulators is of upmost importance, in order to reduce the evolutionary pressures and therefore limit the development of resistance.
Table 2.
Summary of IC50 values for the 2-aminopyrimidine scaffold (µM)
Cmpd | MSSA | MRSA |
10 | 128 | 84 |
15 | 344 | 72 |
23 | 137 | >200 |
26 | 67 | >200 |
37 | 114 | >200 |
Against our MRSA strain, both 10 and 15 were shown to be non-toxic biofilm inhibitors. Both however, were eliciting their behavior in a toxic manner against MSSA. The ability of compound 10 to inhibit P. aeruginosa biofilms was also occurring via a toxic mechanism. Alkyne 10 was shown to be a more potent biofilm inhibitor against both P. aeruginosa and MSSA, as compared to 15. Both 10 and 15 were each able to equally inhibit MRSA biofilms
With the success of the 2-aminopyrimidine amides 10 and 15, additional analogues of the 5-substituted 2-aminopyrimidine scaffold were explored to potentially identify further biofilm inhibitors. In an effort to discover additional non-toxic biofilm modulators we focused on three classes of molecules: 2-aminopyrimidine-triazoles, 2-aminopyrimidine-alkyls, and 2-aminopyrimidine-aryls. These classes were once again based on previously active 2-aminoimidazole scaffolds.27–29
The synthetic route to each class is outlined in Scheme 2. The 2-aminopyrimidine-triazoles were accessed through the use of terminal alkyne 1730 and the Cu catalyzed [3+2] cycloaddition. The 2-aminopyrimidine-alkynes were synthesized utilizing the Sonogashira coupling reaction. The final class of 2-aminopyrimidines prepared was the 2-aminopyrimidine-aryl class, which was synthesized using the Suzuki coupling reaction.
These second generation classes of 2-aminopyrimidines were then screened for their ability to inhibit P. aeruginosa, MSSA, and MRSA biofilm formation (See Table 3). Activity against A. baumannii was not examined due to the low activity displayed by the 2-aminopyrimidine amides. The 2-aminopyrimidine terminal alkyne, 17, and triazole class 18–21 exhibited little ability to inhibit biofilm formation at the highest concentration tested (200 µM) against any of the three strains. 5-Iodo-2-aminopyrimidine (22) was able to inhibit MSSA biofilm formation by 65.5% at 200 µM. Unfortunately, when 22 was screened at lower concentrations a precipitous drop in activity was observed (i.e., 65.5% at 200 µM, 8% at 150 µM), typical of a toxic mechanism.
Table 3.
Percent inhibition of biofilm formation at 200 µM for the 2nd generation 2-aminopyrimidines
Cmpd | P. aeruginosa | MSSA | MRSA |
---|---|---|---|
17 | −41.7 ± 4.0a* | 18.3 ± 8.5 | 20.3 ± 3.7 |
18 | −6.98 ± 6.0* | 10.2 ± 12.6 | 7.2 ± 1.0 |
19 | 14.0 ± 7.6 | 0.8 ± 10.0 | 20.4 ± 17.2 |
20 | −1.9 ± 1.6* | −24.5 ± 20.2* | 9.4 ± 12.1 |
21 | 11.6 ± 5.1 | −34.1 ± 5* | 0.6 ± 5.9 |
22 | −15.8 ± 4.0* | 2.5 ± 4.1 | 39.6±9.4 |
23 | −25.3 ± 9.4* | 65.5 ± 4.0 | −11.9±8.8* |
24 | −20.2 ± 1.3* | −3.6 ± 10.2* | 2.1 ± 21 |
25 | −24.2 ± 4.3* | 22.0 ± 13.1 | 14.7 ± 3.7 |
26 | −21.1 ± 3.1* | 80.2 ± 2.8 | 14.5±26.4 |
27 | −3.3 ± 0.9* | 12.7 ± 3.0 | −4.6±3.3* |
28 | −23.8 ± 9.9* | 3.0 ± 4.1 | 16.9±8 |
29 | −32.6 ± 4.3* | 30.3 ± 2 | 40.7±10.9 |
30 | −32.6 ± 5.4* | 6.4 ± 10.8 | 32.9±4.1 |
31 | −12.9 ± 7.8* | 43.1 ± 8.8* | 27.6±5.2 |
32 | 0.5 ± 7.9 | −68.1 ± 6.6* | 19.4±7.1 |
33 | −22.0 ± 5.0* | 27.0 ± 11.4 | 14.7±11.1 |
34 | −14.3 ± 8.7* | −27.2 ± 9.4* | 10.8±13.5 |
35 | 3.6 ± 2.7 | −29.5 ± 17.7* | −9.2±9.9* |
36 | −18.6 ± 4.3* | 18.4 ± 18.1 | 13.3±3.7 |
37 | −26.7 ± 6.6* | 63.6 ± 3.0 | 32.0±23.5 |
± indicates one standard deviation;
indicates biofilm promotion
The 2-aminopyrimidine-aryl class, 32–37 exhibited interesting behavior against MSSA biofilms; however they were ineffective against both MRSA and P. aeruginosa. Compound 37 was able to inhibit MSSA biofilm formation by 64% at 200 µM. Compound 37 was then subjected to dose-response assays, in order to determine the IC50 value for the inhibition of MSSA biofilms, and an IC50 of 114 µM was obtained (Table 2). When assayed at 200 µM, the naphthyl-derivative 32 promoted MSSA biofilm formation by 68%. Compound 32 returned dose-response data indicating that at 61 µM it induced 50% more biofilm formation than the control. Growth curve analysis confirmed that both 32 and 37 act via non-toxic mechanisms.
The 2-aminopyrimidine-alkyne class of analogues also provided two biofilm modulators. Compounds 23 and 26 demonstrated the ability to inhibit MSSA biofilm formation by 66% and 80% at 200 µM and returned IC50 values of 137 µM and 67 µM respectively (Table 2). Growth curve analysis of 23 and 26 proved that the inhibition of MSSA biofilm formation occurs through a non-toxic mechanism.
Given that the 2-aminopyrimidine classes were able to inhibit S. aureus biofilm formation we turned our attention to the dispersion of pre-formed biofilms. Unfortunately, unlike the 2-AI class of anti-biofilm compounds, none of the 2-aminopyrimidines were able to successfully disperse MSSA biofilms at the highest concentration tested (200 µM). The dispersion of biofilms formed by Gram-negative strains was not investigated.
We have recently reported synergistic effects between a 2-aminoimidazole derivative and β-lactam antibiotics against MRSA and multi-drug resistant A. baumannii.31 We therefore investigated whether 2-aminopyrimidine derivatives were also able to suppress resistance of MRSA to penicillin G. The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of penicillin G against MRSA (ATCC BAA-44) was determined using a standard broth microdilution assay32 in media supplemented with each 2-aminoyrimidine derivative at a concentration of 50 µM. The MIC of penicillin G was reduced by four-fold (32 µg/mL to 8 µg/mL) in the presence of 2-aminopyrimidines 16 and 37 when compared to penicillin G only controls. Both 16 and 37 were shown by growth curve analysis to have no effect on bacterial growth at 50 µM.
Conclusions
In conclusion, we have developed a novel scaffold of biofilm modulators based upon the 2-aminopyrimidine architecture. The library of 2-aminopyrimidines synthesized in this study has provided three non-toxic as well as two toxic inhibitors of MSSA biofilms (i.e., non-toxic compounds 23, 26, and 37; toxic compounds 10 and 15). Both 10 and 15 were also shown to inhibit MRSA biofilms in a non-toxic fashion. 2-Aminopyrimidine 10 was also able to inhibit P. aeruginosa biofilm formation, via a toxic mechanism. Interestingly, 32 displayed the ability promote S. aureus biofilm formation in a non-toxic manner. Two members of this 2-aminopyrimidine class of compounds were also able to suppress resistance of MRSA to penicillin G.
Experimental Section
All reagents used for chemical synthesis were purchased from commercially available sources and used without further purification. Chromatography was performed using 60 Ǻ mesh standard grade silica gel from Sorbtech. NMR solvents were obtained from Cambridge Isotope Labs and used as is. All 1H NMR (300 MHz or 400 MHz) and 13C NMR (75 MHz or 100 MHz) spectra were recorded at 25°C on Varian Mercury spectrometers. Chemical shifts (δ) are given in ppm relative to tetramethylsilane or the respective NMR solvent; coupling constants (J) are in hertz (Hz). Abbreviations used are s = singlet, bs = broad singlet, d = doublet, dd = doublet of doublets, t = triplet, dt = doublet of triplets, bt = broad triplet, qt = quartet, m = multiplet, bm = broad multiplet, p = pentet, and br = broad. Mass spectra were obtained at the NCSU Department of Chemistry Mass Spectrometry Facility. Funding was obtained from the North Carolina Biotechnology Center and the NCSU Department of Chemistry. Infrared spectra were obtained on a FT/IR-4100 spectrophotometer (νmax in cm−1). UV absorbance was recorded on a Genesys 10 scanning UV/visible spectrophotometer (λmax in nm).
Di-tert-butyl 5-iodopyrimidin-2-ylcarbamate (4)
A mixture of 2-amino-5-iodopyrimidine (5 g, 22.6 mmol) and di-tert-butyl dicarbonate (14 g, 64.1 mmol), was dissolved in 40 mL of pyridine. The reaction was placed under a N2 atmosphere, and heated to 70°C overnight. The reaction was then cooled to room temperature, and diluted with ethyl acetate. The mixture was then washed with water, followed by brine. The aqueous layer was then back extracted two times with ethyl acetate. The combined organic layers were then dried with Na2SO4 and concentrated in vacuo. The residue was then purified using silica gel column chromatography, to yield di-tert-butyl 5-iodopyrimidin-2-ylcarbamate as an orange solid (7.62 g, 80%, m.p. = 134 – 139 °C). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.89 (s, 2H), 1.43 (s, 18H) ppm; 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 164.3, 157.6, 150.6, 90.0, 84.1, 28.0 ppm; IR νmax (cm−1) 2943, 1798, 1754, 1657, 1525, 1442, 1296 1164, 1104; HRMS (ESI) calcd for C14H20IN3O4 (M+) 444.0391, found 444.0397.
General Procedure for the Sonogashira coupling of di-tert-butyl 5-iodopyrimidin-2-ylcarbamate
Di-tert-butyl 5-iodopyrimidin-2-ylcarbamate (0.5 mmol) was added to a flame dried vial, followed by the addition of PdCl2(PPh3)2 (0.05 mmol) and CuI (0.05 mmol). This mixture was then dissolved in 5mL of dry acetonitrile. To this the appropriate alkyne (1.1 mmol) was added to the reaction mixture. The reaction was placed under a N2 atmosphere and triethylamine (3mmol) was then added to the reaction mixture dropwise. Reaction mixtures were allowed to stir until completion via TLC analysis. The solvents were then removed in vacuo. The mixture was then taken up in 50 mL of ethyl acetate, and washed with water and brine. The organic layer was then dried using MgSO4, filtered and concentrated. The mixture was then purified via silica gel column chromatography.
Di-tert-butyl 5-(3-hexanamidoprop-1-ynyl)pyrimidin-2-ylcarbamate
Following the general procedure for the Sonogashira coupling of di-tert-butyl 5-iodopyrimidin-2-ylcarbamate, di-tert-butyl 5-iodopyrimidin-2-ylcarbamate was reacted with N-(prop-2-ynyl)hexanamide to produce di-tert-butyl 5-(3-hexanamidoprop-1-ynyl)pyrimidin-2-ylcarbamate (0.19 g, 86% yield) as a yellow oil. 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.69 (s, 2H), 5.82 (bs, 1H), 4.29 (d, J = 5.6 Hz, 2H), 2.21 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 2H), 1.642-1.274 (m,25H), 0.87 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 3H) ppm; 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 173.1, 160.7 156.9, 150.5, 116.7, 92.8, 84.0, 76.3, 36.6, 31.6, 29.9, 28.0, 25.4, 22.6, 14.1 ppm; IR νmax (cm−1) 3367, 2943, 1798, 1754, 1657, 1525, 1442, 1296 1164; UV (λmax nm) 251; HRMS (ESI) calcd for C23H34N4O5 (M+) 469.2421, found 469.2420.
Di-tert-butyl 5-(3-octanamidoprop-1-ynyl)pyrimidin-2-ylcarbamate
Following the general procedure for the Sonogashira coupling of di-tert-butyl 5-iodopyrimidin-2-ylcarbamate, di-tert-butyl 5-iodopyrimidin-2-ylcarbamate was reacted with N-(prop-2-ynyl)octanamide to produce di-tert-butyl 5-(3-octanamidoprop-1-ynyl)pyrimidin-2-ylcarbamate (0.20 g, 85% yield) as a yellow oil. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.69 (s, 2H), 5.95 (bs, 1H), 4.28 (d, J = 5.6 Hz, 2H), 2.21 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 2H), 1.65-1.24 (m, 28H), 0.84 (t, J = 6.8 Hz, 3H) ppm; 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 173.1, 160.7, 156.8, 150.5, 116.7, 92.9, 84.0, 76.1, 36.6 31.8, 29.9, 29.4, 29.2, 28.0, 25.7, 22.7, 14.3 ppm; IR νmax (cm−1) 3318, 2943, 2867, 1797, 1762, 1657, 1533, 1428, 1303, 1115; UV (λmax nm) 251; HRMS (ESI) calcd for C25H38N4O5 (M+) 497.2734, found 497.2743.
Di-tert-butyl 5-(3-decanamidoprop-1-ynyl)pyrimidin-2-ylcarbamate
Following the general procedure for the Sonogashira coupling of di-tert-butyl 5-iodopyrimidin-2-ylcarbamate, di-tert-butyl 5-iodopyrimidin-2-ylcarbamate was reacted with N-(prop-2-ynyl)decanamide to produce di-tert-butyl 5-(3-decanamidoprop-1-ynyl)pyrimidin-2-ylcarbamate (0.22 g, 87% yield) as a yellow oil. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.70 (s, 2H), 5.75 (bs, 1H), 4.30 (d, J = 5.2 Hz, 2H), 2.21 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 2H), 1.65-1.23 (m, 32H), 0.85 (t, J = 6.8 Hz, 3H) ppm; 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 173.0, 160.7, 156.9, 150.6, 116.7, 92.8, 84.0, 76.3, 36.7, 32.1, 30.0, 29.7, 29.6, 29.5. 29.4, 28.1, 25.8, 22.9, 14.3 ppm; IR νmax (cm−1) 3377, 2929, 2853, 1797, 1762, 1655, 1536, 1432, 1374, 1291, 1252, 1154, 1115; UV (λmax nm) 251; HRMS (ESI) calcd for C27H42N4O5 (M+) 525.3047, found 525.3049.
Di-tert-butyl 5-(3-dodecanamidoprop-1-ynyl)pyrimidin-2-ylcarbamate
Following the general procedure for the Sonogashira coupling of di-tert-butyl 5-iodopyrimidin-2-ylcarbamate, di-tert-butyl 5-iodopyrimidin-2-ylcarbamate was reacted with N-(prop-2-ynyl)dodecanamide to produce di-tert-butyl 5-(3-dodecanamidoprop-1-ynyl)pyrimidin-2-ylcarbamate (0.22 g, 82% yield) as a yellow oil. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.70 (s, 2H), 5.80 (bs, 1H), 4.29 (d, J = 5.2 Hz, 2H), 2.21 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 2H), 1.65-1.23 (m, 36H), 0.85 (,J = 6.8 Hz, 3H) ppm; 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 173.1, 160.7, 156.9, 150.6, 116.7, 92.8, 84.0, 76.3, 36.7, 32.1, 29.9, 28.8, 29.8, 29.7, 29.6, 29.5, 28.0, 25.7, 22.9, 14.3 ppm; IR νmax (cm−1) 3377, 2923, 2853, 1797, 1761, 1660, 1532, 1443, 1373, 1293, 1241, 1153, 1108 UV (λmax nm) 249; HRMS (ESI) calcd for C27H42N4O5 (M+) 553.336, found 553.334.
General Procedure for Alkyne Reduction
The appropriate pyrimidine containing alkyne (0.25 mmol) was dissolved in 5 mL ethyl aceate. The reaction mixture was cooled to 0°C and charged with 10% Pd/C. The reaction mixture was then placed under a 65 psi atmosphere of H2. The reaction was allowed to stir for 16 hours. Upon completion the reaction mixture was filtered through celite and concentrated in vacuo.
Di-tert-butyl 5-(3-hexanamidopropyl)pyrimidin-2-ylcarbamate
Following the general procedure for alkyne reduction, di-tert-butyl 5-(3-hexanamidoprop-1-ynyl)pyrimidin-2-ylcarbamate was reacted to give di-tert-butyl 5-(3-hexanamidopropyl)pyrimidin-2-ylcarbamate (0.12, 99%) as a yellow oil. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.57 (s, 2H), 5.61 (bs, 1H), 3.30 (q, J = 6.8 Hz, 2H), 2.64 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 2H), 2.15 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 2H), 1.82 (p, J = 7.6 Hz, 2H), 1.61 (p, J = 7.2 Hz, 2H), 1.39 (s, 18H), 1.27 (m, 4H), 0.86 (t, J = 6.4Hz, 3H) ppm; 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 173.6, 158.5, 157.2, 151.1, 132.6, 83.6, 39.0, 37.0, 31.7, 31.2, 28.1, 27.5, 25.6, 22.6, 14.2 ppm; IR νmax (cm−1) 3399, 2951, 2860, 1791, 1757, 1652, 1543, 1429, 1370, 1290, 1255, 1159, 1105; UV (λmax nm) 225; HRMS (ESI) calcd for C23H38N4O5 (M+) 473.2734, found 473.2737.
Di-tert-butyl 5-(3-octanamidopropyl)pyrimidin-2-ylcarbamate
Following the general procedure for alkyne reduction, di-tert-butyl 5-(3-octanamidoprop-1-ynyl)pyrimidin-2-ylcarbamate was reacted to give di-tert-butyl 5-(3-octanamidopropyl)pyrimidin-2-ylcarbamate (0.12 g, 99%) as a yellow oil. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.56 (s, 2H), 5.65 (bs, 1H), 3.29 (q, J = 6.4 Hz, 2H), 2.62 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 2H), 2.14 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 2H), 1.81 (p, J = 7.6 Hz, 2H), 1.61-1.24 (m, 24H), 0.84 (t, J = 6.8Hz, 3H) ppm; 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 173.6, 158.5, 157.2, 151.1, 132.6, 83.6, 39.0, 37.0, 31.9, 31.1, 29.4, 29.2, 28.1, 27.5, 26.0, 22.8, 14.2 ppm; IR νmax (cm−1) 3398, 2956, 2853, 1791, 1750, 1644, 1559, 1434, 1361, 1304, 1247, 1161, 1113; UV (λmax nm) 227; HRMS (ESI) calcd for C25H42N4O5 (M+) 501.3047, found 501.3044.
Di-tert-butyl 5-(3-decanamidopropyl)pyrimidin-2-ylcarbamate
Following the general procedure for alkyne reduction, di-tert-butyl 5-(3-decanamidoprop-1-ynyl)pyrimidin-2-ylcarbamate was reacted to give di-tert-butyl 5-(3-decanamidopropyl)pyrimidin-2-ylcarbamate (0.13 g, 99%) as a yellow oil. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.57 (s, 2H), 5.55 (bs, 1H), 3.31 (q, J = 7.2 Hz, 2H), 2.64 (t, J = 8Hz, 2H), 2.15 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 2H), 1.82 (p, J = 7.6 Hz, 2H), 1.60 (m, 2H), 1.42 (m, 18H), 1.26 (m, 12H), 0.84 (t, J = 6.8Hz, 3H) ppm; 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 173.6, 158.5, 157.2, 151.1, 132.6, 83.7, 39.0, 37.0, 32.0, 31.2, 29.6, 29.6, 29.5, 29.5, 28.1, 27.5, 26.0, 22.9, 14.3 ppm; IR νmax (cm−1) 3419, 2956, 2853, 1793, 1734, 1655, 1560, 1455, 1433, 1372, 1288, 1252, 1163, 1121; UV (λmax nm) 228; HRMS (ESI) calcd for C27H46N4O5 (M+) 529.336, found 529.3363.
Di-tert-butyl 5-(3-dodecanamidopropyl)pyrimidin-2-ylcarbamate
Following the general procedure for alkyne reduction, di-tert-butyl 5-(3-dodecanamidoprop-1-ynyl)pyrimidin-2-ylcarbamate was reacted to give di-tert-butyl 5-(3-dodecanamidopropyl)pyrimidin-2-ylcarbamate (0.13 g, 99%) as a yellow oil. 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.52 (s, 2H), 5.96 (t, J = 5.7 Hz, 1H), 3.25 (q, J = 6.6 Hz, 2H), 2.60 (t, J = 7.5Hz, 2H), 2.11 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H), 1.78 (p, J = 7.5Hz, 2H), 1.58-1.51 (m, 2H), 1.44-1.18 (m, 34H), 0.80 (t, J = 7.2Hz, 3H) ppm; 13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3) δ 173.6, 158.4, 157.0, 150.9, 132.7, 83.5, 38.8, 36.8, 32.0, 31.0, 29.7, 29.6, 29.5, 29.4, 29.4, 28.0, 27.4, 25.9, 22.8, 14.2 ppm; IR νmax (cm−1) 3288, 3364, 2929, 2853, 1788, 1733, 1650, 1554, 1436, 1367, 1297, 1153, 1111 UV (λmax nm) 226; HRMS (ESI) calcd for C29H50N4O5 (M+) 535.3854, found 535.3851.
General Procedure for Boc-deprotection
The appropriate Boc-protected amine was dissolved in a 1:20 trifluoroacetic acid: dichloromethane mixture and stirred for 16 hr. Upon completion, the reaction mixture was concentrated in vacuo and then left on a high vacuum overnight. Methanol supplemented with HCl was added to the product forming the HCl salt of the deprotected product and then concentrated in vacuo. The resulting residue was washed with pentane and then placed on a high vacuum overnight.
N-(3-(2-Aminopyrimidin-5-yl)prop-2-ynyl)hexanamide hydrochloride (9)
Following the general Boc-deprotection procedure di-tert-butyl 5 di-tert-butyl 5-(3-hexanamidoprop-1-ynyl)pyrimidin-2-ylcarbamate was reacted to give N-(3-(2-aminopyrimidin-5-yl)prop-2-ynyl)hexanamide hydrochloride (0.05 g, 99%) as a tan solid (m.p. = 150 – 152 °C). 1H NMR (300 MHz, CD3OD) δ 8.66 (s, 2H), , 4.20 (s, 2H), 2.23 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 2H), 1.62 (p, J = 6.9Hz, 2H), 1.34 (m, 4H), 0.90 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 3H) ppm; 13C NMR (75 MHz, CD3OD) δ 176.3, 160.0, 156.1, 108.7, 92.4, 74.2, 36.9, 32.6, 30.2, 26.7, 23.6, 14.5 ppm; IR νmax (cm−1) 3296, 3170, 2921, 2850, 1693, 1643, 1602, 1533, 1504, 1467, 1413, 1396, 1348, 1300, 661; HRMS (ESI) calcd for C13H18N4O (M+) 247.1553, found 247.1555.
N-(3-(2-Aminopyrimidin-5-yl)prop-2-ynyl)octanamide hydrochloride (10)
Following the general Boc-deprotection procedure di-tert-butyl 5-(3-octanamidoprop-1-ynyl)pyrimidin-2-ylcarbamate was reacted to give N-(3-(2-aminopyrimidin-5-yl)prop-2-ynyl)octanamide hydrochloride (0.05 g, 99%) as a tan solid (m.p. = 154 – 156 °C). 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 8.35 (s, 2H), 4.4-3.8 (bs, 6H + H2O), 2.08 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 2H), 1.48 (p, J = 7.2 Hz, 2H), 1.23 (bs, 8H), 0.84 (t, J = 6.8 Hz, 3H) ppm. 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 172.0, 159.5, 158.3, 105.9, 90.7, 75.1, 35.1, 31.3, 28.7, 28.6, 28.5, 25.2, 22.1, 14.0 ppm; IR νmax (cm−1) 3296, 3168, 2921, 2850, 1693, 1643, 1602, 1533, 1504, 1467, 1413, 1396, 1348, 1300, 661; HRMS (ESI) calcd for C15H22N4O (M+) 275.1866, found 275.1868.
N-(3-(2-Aminopyrimidin-5-yl)prop-2-ynyl)decanamide hydrochloride (11)
Following the general Boc-deprotection procedure di-tert-butyl 5-(3-decanamidoprop-1-ynyl)pyrimidin-2-ylcarbamate was reacted to give N-(3-(2-aminopyrimidin-5-yl)prop-2-ynyl)decanamide hydrochloride (0.04 g, 99%) as a tan solid (m.p. = 154 – 156 °C). 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 8.41 (s, 2H), 4.66 (bs, 4H), 4.30 (d, J = 5.2 Hz, 2H), 2.08 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 2H), 1.48 (m, 2H), 1.22 (m, 12H), 0.84 (t, J = 6.8 Hz, 3H) ppm; 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 172.0, 159.8, 159.7, 105.9, 90.2, 75.8, 35.1, 31.3, 29.0, 28.8, 28.7, 28.7, 28.5, 25.2, 22.1, 14.0 ppm; IR νmax (cm−1) 3295, 2921, 2850, 1693, 1643, 1533, 1467, 1396, 1348, 1226, 1195, 661; HRMS (ESI) calcd for C17H26N4O (M+) 303.2179, found 303.2179.
N-(3-(2-Aminopyrimidin-5-yl)prop-2-ynyl)dodecanamide hydrochloride (12)
Following the general Boc-deprotection procedure di-tert-butyl 5-(3-dodecanamidoprop-1-ynyl)pyrimidin-2-ylcarbamate was reacted to give N-(3-(2-aminopyrimidin-5-yl)prop-2-ynyl)dodecanamide hydrochloride (0.04 g, 99%) as a tan solid (m.p. = 154 – 156 °C). 1H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 8.38 (s, 2H), 4.49 (bs, 4H), 4.08 (d, J = 5.7 Hz, 2H), 2.08 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 2H), 1.48 (p, J = 6.9 Hz, 2H), 1.22 (s, 12H), 0.84 (t, J = 6.3 Hz, 3H) ppm; 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 172.0, 160.2, 160.0 105.9, 90.0, 76.0, 35.1, 31.3, 29.1, 29.0, 28.8, 28.8, 28.7, 28.6, 25.2, 22.1, 14.1 ppm; IR νmax (cm−1) 3297, 3176, 2919, 2850, 1693, 1641, 1602, 1553, 1504, 1467, 1415, 661; HRMS (ESI) calcd for C19H30N4O (M+) 331.2492, found 331.2943.
N-(3-(2-Aminopyrimidin-5-yl)propyl)hexanamide hydrochloride (13)
Following the general Boc-deprotection procedure di-tert-butyl 5-(3-hexanamidopropyl)pyrimidin-2-ylcarbamate was reacted to give N-(3-(2-aminopyrimidin-5-yl)propyl)hexanamide hydrochloride (.04, 99%) as a tan solid (m.p. = 138–142 °C). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CD3OD) δ 8.54 (s, 2H), 3.34 (m, 2H), 2.65 (t, J = 8 Hz, 2H), 2.375 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 2H), 1.88 (p, J = 7.2 Hz, 2H), 1.65 (p, J = 8 Hz), 1.39-1.30 (m, 4H), 0.92 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 3H) ppm; 13C NMR (100 MHz, CD3OD) δ 178.5, 157.7, 156.5, 124.8, 40.9, 35.8, 32.5, 30.2, 27.0, 26.9, 23.4, 14.4 ppm; IR νmax (cm−1) 3303, 3158, 2921, 2850, 1702, 1658, 1637, 1538, 1467, 1396; HRMS (ESI) calcd for C13H22N4O (M+) 251.1866, found 251.1869.
N-(3-(2-Aminopyrimidin-5-yl)propyl)octanamide hydrochloride (14)
Following the general Boc-deprotection procedure di-tert-butyl 5-(3-octanamidopropyl)pyrimidin-2-ylcarbamate was reacted to give N-(3-(2-aminopyrimidin-5-yl)propyl)octanamide hydrochloride (0.05 g, 99%) as a tan solid (m.p. = 140–142 °C). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CD3OD) δ 8.50 (s, 2H), 3.24 (t, J = 6.8 Hz, 2H), 2.62 (t, J = 8 Hz, 2H), 2.25 (t, 8 Hz, 2H), 1.83 (p, J = 8 Hz, 2H), 1.62 (p, J = 8 Hz, 2H), 1.33-1.31 (m, 8H), 0.90 (t, J = 8Hz, 3H) ppm; 13C NMR (100 MHz, CD3OD) δ 177.6, 157.7, 156.5, 125.0, 40.1, 36.5, 32.9, 30.5, 30.3, 30.1, 27.3, 27.0, 23.7, 14.5 ppm; ; IR νmax (cm−1) 3303, 3156, 2922, 2850, 1701, 1658, 1636, 1539, 1467, 1395; HRMS (ESI) calcd for C15H26N4O (M+) 279.2179, found 279.2181.
N-(3-(2-Aminopyrimidin-5-yl)propyl)decanamide hydrochloride (15)
Following the general Boc-deprotection procedure di-tert-butyl 5-(3-decanamidopropyl)pyrimidin-2-ylcarbamate was reacted to give N-(3-(2-aminopyrimidin-5-yl)propyl)decanamide hydrochloride (0.03 g, 99%) as a tan solid (m.p. = 144 – 148 °C). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CD3OD) δ 8.49 (s, 2H), 3.20 (t, J = 6.4 Hz, 2H), 2.60 (t, J = 8 Hz, 2H), 2.19 (t, J = 8 Hz, 2H), 1.81 (p, J = 8 Hz, 2H), 1.60 (p, J = 8 Hz, 2H), 1.32-1.29 (m, 12H), 0.89 (t, J = 6.8 Hz, 3H) ppm; 13C NMR (100 MHz, CD3OD) δ 175.3, 156.4, 155.4, 123.8, 37.8, 36.0, 31.9, 29.8, 29.4, 29.3, 29.2, 29.2, 25.9, 25.7, 22.6, 13.3 ppm; IR νmax (cm−1) 3303, 3158, 2921, 2850, 1702, 1658, 1637, 1538, 1467, 1396, 1211; HRMS (ESI) calcd for C17H30N4O (M+) 307.2492, found 307.2498.
N-(3-(2-Aminopyrimidin-5-yl)propyl)dodecanamide hydrochloride (16)
Following the general Boc-deprotection procedure di-tert-butyl 5-(3-dodecanamidopropyl)pyrimidin-2-ylcarbamate was reacted to give N-(3-(2-aminopyrimidin-5-yl)propyl)dodecanamide hydrochloride (0.04 g, 99%) as a tan solid (m.p. = 145–147 °C). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CD3OD) δ 8.50 (s, 2H), 3.21 (t, J = 8 Hz, 2H), 2.61 (t, J = 8 Hz, 2H), 2.20 (t, J = 8 Hz, 2H), 1.81 (p, J = 8 Hz, 2H), 1.61 (p, J = 8 Hz, 2H), 1.32-1.29 (m, 16H), 0.90 (t, J = 6.8 Hz, 3H) ppm; 13C NMR (75 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 172.2, 156.5, 155.3, 122.9, 37.2, 35.4, 31.3, 29.8, 29.0, 29.0, 28.8, 28.8, 25.3, 22.1, 14.0 ppm; ; IR νmax (cm−1) 3301, 3159, 2925, 2855, 1704, 1659, 1632, 1535, 1467, 1391; HRMS (ESI) calcd for C19H34N4O (M+) 335.2805, found 335.2805.
5-Ethynylpyrimidin-2-amine (17)
Was synthesized following the general procedure by H. Zhao et. al.33
General procedure for click reactions
The terminal alkyne (1.0 mmol.) was dissolved in a 1:1:1 mixture of tert-butanol, water and methylene chloride (ca. 3 mL per 0.200 g of terminal alkyne). To this mixture, the appropriate azide (1.2 mmol.) was added while stirring vigorously at room temperature. Copper (II) sulfate (15 mol%) and sodium ascorbate (45 mol%) were then added sequentially to the solution. Reaction mixtures were allowed to stir until completion via TLC analysis (12 – 24 hrs). The solvents were then removed in vacuo in which the resulting residue was purified via silica gel column chromatography.
5-(1-Hexyl-1H-1,2,3-triazol-4-yl)pyrimidin-2-amine (18)
Following the general procedure for the click reaction 5-ethynylpyrimidin-2-amine was reacted with 1-azidohexane to give 5-(1-hexyl-1H-1,2,3-triazol-4-yl)pyrimidin-2-amine (0.10 g, 40%) as a white solid (m.p. = 164 – 166°C). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.71 (s, 2H), 7.70 (s, 1H), 5.60 (bs, 2H), 4.37 (t, J = 6.8 Hz, 2H), 1.92 (m, 2H), 1.30 (bs, 6H), 0.86 (t, J = 6.4 Hz, 3H) ppm; 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 162.7, 155.8, 142.9, 118.7, 115.7, 50.7, 31.3, 30.4, 26.3, 22.6, 14.1 ppm; IR νmax (cm−1) 3455, 3305, 3160, 2954, 2923, 2854, 2684, 1737, 1666, 1643, 1563, 1548, 1488, 1348, 1224, 798; HRMS (ESI) calcd for C12H18N6 (M+) 47.1666, found 247.1673.
5-(1-Heptyl-1H-1,2,3-triazol-4-yl)pyrimidin-2-amine (19)
Following the general procedure for the click reaction 5-ethynylpyrimidin-2-amine was reacted with 1-azidoheptane to give 5-(1-heptyl-1H-1,2,3-triazol-4-yl)pyrimidin-2-amine (0.12 g, 47%) as a white solid (m.p. = 168 – 170°C). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.72 (s, 2H), 7.66 (s, 1H), 5.26 (bs, 2H), 4.38 (t, J = 6.8Hz, 2H), 1.93 (m, 2H), 1.33-1.26 (m, 8H), 0.86 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 3H) ppm; 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 162.6, 155.8, 142.8, 118.7, 115.7, 50.7, 31.7, 30.5, 28.8, 26.6, 22.7, 14.2 ppm; IR νmax (cm−1) 3455, 3305, 3160, 2954, 2923, 2854, 2684, 1737, 1666, 1643, 1563, 1548, 1488, 1348, 1224, 798; HRMS (ESI) calcd for C13H20N6 (M+) 261.1822, found 261.1832.
5-(1-Nonyl-1H-1,2,3-triazol-4-yl)pyrimidin-2-amine (20)
Following the general procedure for the click reaction 5-ethynylpyrimidin-2-amine was reacted with 1-azidononane to give 5-(1-nonyl-1H-1,2,3-triazol-4-yl)pyrimidin-2-amine (0.14 g, 50%) as a white solid (m.p. = 178 – 180°C). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.71 (s, 2H), 7.67 (s, 1H), 5.18 (bs, 2H), 4.38 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 2H), 1.92 (m, 2H), 1.66 (m, 2H), 1.33-1.24 (m, 12H), 0.85 (t, J = 6.8 Hz, 3H) ppm; 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 162.6, 155.9, 143.0, 118.7, 116.0, 50.8, 32.0, 30.6, 29.5, 29.4, 29.2, 26.7, 22.8, 14.3 ppm; IR νmax (cm−1) 3455, 3305, 3160, 2954, 2923, 2854, 2684, 1737, 1666, 1643, 1563, 1548, 1488, 1348, 1224, 798; HRMS (ESI) calcd for C15H24N6 (M+) 289.2148, found 289.2144.
5-(1-Benzyl-1H-1,2,3-triazol-4-yl)pyrimidin-2-amine (21)
Following the general procedure for the click reaction 5-ethynylpyrimidin-2-amine was reacted with benzylazide to give 5-(1-benzyl-1H-1,2,3-triazol-4-yl)pyrimidin-2-amine (0.14 g, 55%) as a white solid (m.p. = 195 – 196°C). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.68 (s, 2H), 7.58 (s, 1H), 7.39-7.29 (m, 5H), 5.56 (s, 2H), 5.18 (s, 2H) ppm; 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 162.6, 155.8, 143.5, 134.6, 129.5, 129.2, 128.3, 118.7, 116.0, 54.6 ppm; IR νmax (cm−1) 3455, 3305, 3160, 2954, 2923, 2854, 2684, 1737, 1666, 1643, 1563, 1548, 1488, 1348, 1224, 798; HRMS (ESI) calcd for C13H12N6 (M+) 253.1196, found 253.1203.
General procedure for the Sonogashira coupling of 2-amino-5-iodpyrimidine
2-Amino-5-iodpyrimidine (0.5 mmol) was added to a flame dried vial, followed by the addition of PdCl2(PPh3)2 (0.05 mmol) and CuI (0.05 mmol). This mixture was then dissolved in 5mL of dry THF. To this the appropriate alkyne (1.1 mmol) was added to the reaction mixture. The reaction was placed under a N2 atmosphere and triethylamine (3mmol) was then added to the reaction mixture dropwise. The reaction mixture was then heated to reflux and allowed to stir until completion via TLC analysis. The solvents were then removed in vacuo. The mixture was then taken up in 50 mL of ethyl acetate, and washed with water and brine. The organic layer was then dried using MgSO4, filtered and concentrated. The mixture was then purified via silica gel column chromatography.
5-(3-Cyclohexylprop-1-ynyl)pyrimidin-2-amine (23)
Following the general Sonogashira coupling procedure, 2-Amino-5-iodpyrimidine was reacted with prop-2-ynylcyclohexane to yield 5-(3-cyclohexylprop-1-ynyl)pyrimidin-2-amine (0.10 g, 94%) as a tan solid (m.p. = 144–145 °C). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.31 (s, 2H), 5.34 (bs, 2H), 2.28 (d, J = 6.8 Hz, 2H) 1.85- 1.64 (m, 5H), 1.57-1.49 (m,1H), 1.32-0.98 (m, 5H) ppm; 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 161.0, 160.6, 110.0, 92.8, 72.5, 37.6, 33.0, 27.5, 26.4, 26.3 ppm; IR νmax (cm−1) 3328, 3180, 2948, 2863, 2719, 1664, 1596, 1544, 1527, 1506, 798; HRMS (ESI) calcd for C13H17N3 (M+) 216.1495, found 216.1502.
5-(Cyclohexylethynyl)pyrimidin-2-amine (24)
Following the general Sonogashira coupling procedure, 2-Amino-5-iodpyrimidine was reacted with ethynylcyclohexane to yield 5-(cyclohexylethynyl)pyrimidin-2-amine (0.08 g, 78%) as a tan solid (m.p. = 192–196 °C). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.33 (s, 2H0, 5.19 (bs, 2H), 2.56 (septet, J = 4.8 Hz, 1H), 1.85 (bs, 4H), 1.76-1.72 (m, 2H), 1.56-1.45 (m, 2H), 1.36-1.33 (m, 2H) ppm; 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 161.0, 160.6, 110.2, 98.0, 74.6, 32.8, 30.0, 26.1, 25.2 ppm; IR νmax (cm−1) 3328, 3180, 2948, 2863, 2719, 1664, 1596, 1544, 1527, 1506, 798; HRMS (ESI) calcd for C12H15N3 (M+) 202.1339, found 202.1343.
5-(3-Cyclopentylprop-1-ynyl)pyrimidin-2-amine (25)
Following the general Sonogashira coupling procedure, 2-Amino-5-iodpyrimidine was reacted with prop-2-ynylcyclopentane to yield 5-(3-cyclopentylprop-1-ynyl)pyrimidin-2-amine (0.08 g, 75%) as a tan solid (m.p. = 145–147 °C). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.33 (s, 2H), 5.24 (bs, 2H), 2.39 (d, J = 6.4 Hz, 2H), 2.11 (septet, J = 7.2Hz, 1H), 1.86-1.78 (m, 2H), 1.69-1.52 (m, 4H), 1.35-1.25 (m, 2H) ppm; 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 161.0,160.6, 110.1, 93.5, 74.7, 39.2, 32.3, 25.4 ppm; IR νmax (cm−1) 3328, 3180, 2948, 2863, 2719, 1664, 1596, 1544, 1527, 1506, 798; HRMS (ESI) calcd for C12H15N3 (M+) 202.1339, found 202.1346.
5-(Cyclopentylethynyl)pyrimidin-2-amine (26)
Following the general Sonogashira coupling procedure, 2-Amino-5-iodpyrimidine was reacted with ethynylcyclopentane to yield 5-(cyclopentylethynyl)pyrimidin-2-amine (0.08 g, 80%) as a tan solid (m.p. = 204–208 °C). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.32 (s, 2H), 5.31 (bs, 2H), 2.79 (p, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 2.00-1.96 (m, 2H), 1.83-1.58 (m, 6H) ppm; 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 161.0, 160.6, 110.1, 98.1, 74.2, 34.0, 31.0, 25.4 ppm; IR νmax (cm−1) 3328, 3180, 2948, 2863, 2719, 1664, 1596, 1544, 1527, 1506, 798; HRMS (ESI) calcd for C11H13N3 (M+) 188.1182, found 188.1187.
5-(4-Phenylbut-1-ynyl)pyrimidin-2-amine (27)
Following the general Sonogashira coupling procedure, 2-Amino-5-iodpyrimidine was reacted with but-3-ynylbenzene to yield 5-(4-phenylbut-1-ynyl)pyrimidin-2-amine (0.09 g, 83%) as a tan solid (m.p. = 187–192 °C). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.27 (s, 2H), 7.32-7.21 (m, 5H), 5.15 (bs, 2H), 2.89 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 2H), 2.67 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 2H) ppm; 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 161.1, 160.6, 140.6, 128.7, 128.6, 126.6, 109.8, 93.0, 75.6, 35.2, 21.9 ppm; IR νmax (cm−1) 3328, 3183, 3027, 2962, 2927, 2857, 2717, 1666, 1596, 1542, 1508, 1454, 1220, 696; HRMS (ESI) calcd for C14H13N3 (M+) 224.1182, found 224.1178.
5-(Hex-1-ynyl)pyrimidin-2-amine (28)
Was synthesized following the general procedure by Balzarini et. al.34
5-(Hept-1-ynyl)pyrimidin-2-amine (29)
Following the general Sonogashira coupling procedure, 2-Amino-5-iodpyrimidine was reacted with 1-heptyne to yield 5-(hept-1-ynyl)pyrimidin-2-amine (0.09 g, 99%) as a tan solid (m.p. = 147–149 °C). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.30 (s, 2H), 5.14 (bs, 2H), 2.36 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 2H), 1.57 (p, J = 7.2 Hz, 2H), 1.43-1.30 (m, 4H), 0.90 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 3H) ppm; 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 161.1, 160.5, 110.1, 93.6, 74.7, 31.3, 28.5, 22.4, 19.6, 14.2 ppm; IR νmax (cm−1) 3334, 3181, 2931, 2867, 1656, 1594, 1542, 1527, 1504, 1375, 1222, 939, 798, 665, 565, 520, 453; HRMS (ESI) calcd for C11H15N3 (M+) 190.1339, found 190.1338.
5-(Oct-1-ynyl)pyrimidin-2-amine (30)
Was synthesized following the general procedure by Odashima et. al.35
5-(Non-1-ynyl)pyrimidin-2-amine (31)
Following the general Sonogashira coupling procedure, 2-Amino-5-iodpyrimidine was reacted with 1-nonyne to yield 5-(non-1-ynyl)pyrimidin-2-amine (0.09 g, 99%) as a tan solid (m.p. = 136–138 °C). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.31 (s, 2H), 5.24 (bs, 2H), 2.38, (t, J = 6.8 Hz, 2H), 1.58 (p, J = 7.2 Hz, 2H), 1.42 (m, 2H), 1.30 (m, 6H), 0.89 (t, J = 6.8 Hz, 3H) ppm; 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 160.9, 160.6, 110.1, 94.1, 74.6, 31.9, 29.1, 29.0, 28.8, 22.8, 06.7, 14.3 ppm; IR νmax (cm−1) 3335, 3181, 2930, 2867, 1658, 1595, 1544, 1527, 1504, 1375, 1222, 941, 796, 665, 567, 520, 455; HRMS (ESI) calcd for C13H19N3 (M+) 218.1652, found 218.1661.
General procedure for the Suzuki coupling of 2-amino-5-iodpyrimidine
2-Amino-5-iodpyrimidine (0.5 mmol) was added to a vial, followed by the addition of PdCl2(PPh3)2 (0.025 mmol). This mixture was then dissolved in 5mL of THF. To this the appropriate boronic acid (1.0 mmol) was added to the reaction mixture, followed by K2CO3(2M, 2mmol). The reaction was placed under a N2 atmosphere, heated to reflux, and allowed to stir until completion via TLC analysis. The solvents were then removed in vacuo. The mixture was then taken up in 50 mL of ethyl acetate, and washed with saturated NaHCO3, water, and brine. The organic layer was then dried using MgSO4, filtered and concentrated. The mixture was then purified via silica gel column chromatography.
5-(Naphthalen-1-yl)pyrimidin-2-amine (32)
Was synthesized following the general procedure by Murali et. al.36
5-(Naphthalen-2-yl)pyrimidin-2-amine (33)
Was synthesized following the general procedure by Mattay et. al.37
5-(Thiophen-3-yl)pyrimidin-2-amine (34)
Was synthesized following the general procedure by Pallavi et. al.38
5-(Furan-3-yl)pyrimidin-2-amine (35)
Following the general Suzuki coupling procedure, 2-Amino-5-iodpyrimidine was reacted with 3-furylboronic acid to 5-(furan-3-yl)pyrimidin-2-amine (0.06 g, 80%) as a tan solid (m.p. = 138–140 °C). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.40 (s, 2H), 7.64 (s, 1H), 7.48 (d, J = 1.6 Hz, 1H), 6.59 (d, J = 1.6 Hz, 1H), 5.05 (bs, 2H) ppm; 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 1162.2, 155.8, 144.3, 137.8, 120.7, 117.2, 108.4 ppm; IR νmax (cm−1) 3315, 3170, 1670, 1612, 1579, 1513, 1160, 1056, 1012, 771; HRMS (ESI) calcd for C8H7N3O (M+) 162.0662, found 162.0663.
5-(3-Nitrophenyl)pyrimidin-2-amine (36)
Was synthesized following the general procedure by Pallavi et. al.38
5-(4-Butylphenyl)pyrimidin-2-amine (37)
Following the general Suzuki coupling procedure, 2-Amino-5-iodpyrimidine was reacted with 4-butylphenylboronic acid to 5-(4-butylphenyl)pyrimidin-2-amine (.10 g, 90%) as a tan solid (m.p. = 162–167 °C). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.52 (s, 2H), 7.39 (d, J = 8 Hz, 2H), 7.26 (d, J = 8 Hz, 2H), 5.30 (bs, 2H), 2.65 (t, J = 8 Hz, 2H), 1.62 (p, J = 8 Hz, 2H), 1.37 (sextet, J = 8 Hz, 2H), 0.94 (t, J = 8 Hz, 3H) ppm; 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 162.2, 156.6, 142.8, 132.7, 129.5, 126.2, 125.2, 35.5, 33.9, 22.6, 14.2 ppm; IR νmax (cm−1) 3451, 3305, 3170, 3019, 2954, 2925, 2856, 1671, 1643, 1600, 1569, 1550, 1533, 1500, 829; HRMS (ESI) calcd for C14H17N3 (M+) 228.1495, found 228.15.
Procedure to determine the inhibitory effect of test compounds on S. aureus, PA14, and A. baumannii biofilm formation
Inhibition assays were performed by taking an overnight culture of bacterial strain and subculturing it at an OD600 of 0.01 into the necessary medium (tryptic soy broth with a 0.5% glucose supplement (TSBG) for MRSA (ATCC # BAA-44) and S. aureus (ATCC # 29213), Luria-Bertani (LB) medium for A. baumannii (ATCC # 19606) and Luria-Bertani medium without NaCl (LBNS) for PA14. Stock solutions of predetermined concentrations of the test compound were then made in the necessary medium. These stock solutions were aliquoted (100 µL) into the wells of the 96-well PVC microtiter plate. Sample plates were then wrapped in GLAD Press n’ Seal® followed by an incubation under stationary conditions for 24 h at 37 °C (6 h for PA14). After incubation, the medium was discarded from the wells and the plates were washed thoroughly with water. Plates were then stained with 100 µL of 0.1% solution of crystal violet (CV) and then incubated at ambient temperature for 30 min. Plates were washed with water again and the remaining stain was solubilized with 200 µL of 95% ethanol. A sample of 125 µL of solubilized CV stain from each well was transferred to the corresponding wells of a polystyrene microtiter dish. Biofilm inhibition was quantitated by measuring the OD540 of each well and calculated as a percentage of the control (no compound), a negative control lane wherein no biofilm was formed served as a background and was subtracted out.
Procedure to determine the dispersal effect of test compounds on S. aureus pre-formed biofilms
Dispersion assays were performed by taking an overnight culture of S. aureus (ATCC # 29213) and subculturing it at an OD600 of 0.01 into TSBG The resulting bacterial suspension was aliquoted (100 µL) into the wells of a 96-well PVC microtiter plate. Plates were then wrapped in GLAD Press n’ Seal® followed by an incubation under stationary conditions at 37 °C to establish the biofilms. After 24 h, the medium was discarded from the wells and the plates were washed thoroughly with water. Stock solutions of predetermined concentrations of the test compound were then made in the necessary medium. These stock solutions were aliquoted (100 µL) into the wells of the 96-well PVC microtiter plate with the established biofilms. Medium alone was added to a subset of the wells to serve as a control. Sample plates were then incubated for 24 h at 37 °C. After incubation, the medium was discarded from the wells and the plates were washed thoroughly with water. Plates were then stained with 100 µL of 0.1% solution of crystal violet (CV) and then incubated at ambient temperature for 30 min. Plates were washed with water again and the remaining stain was solubilized with 200 µL of 95% ethanol. A sample of 125 µL of solubilized CV stain from each well was transferred to the corresponding wells of a polystyrene microtiter dish. Biofilm inhibition was quantitated by measuring the OD540 of each well and calculated as a percentage of the control (no compound), a negative control lane wherein no biofilm was formed served as a background and was subtracted out.
Procedure to determine the effect of test compounds at IC50 concentrations on planktonic viability via growth curve analysis
Growth curves were performed by taking an overnight culture of bacterial strain and subculturing it at an OD600 of 0.01 into the necessary medium (LB for A. baumannii, LBNS for PA14, TSBG for S. aureus and MRSA. The resulting bacterial suspension was then aliquoted (3.0 mL) into culture tubes. The test compound was then added at a predetermined concentration. Controls were employed in which no test compound was added to the bacterial suspension. Samples were then placed in an incubator at 37 °C and shaken at 200 rpm. The OD600 of the samples was measured at time intervals starting at 2 hours and ending at 24 hours.
Broth microdilution method for antibiotic resensitization
Mueller–Hinton broth (MHB) was inoculated (5×105 CFU/mL) with MRSA (BAA-44). Aliquots (4 mL) of the resulting bacterial suspension were distributed to culture tubes and compound, from 100 mm DMSO stock, was added to give the final testing concentration. Bacteria not treated with compound served as the control. After sitting for 30 min at room temperature, 1 mL of each sample was transferred to a new culture tube and penicillin G sodium salt was added from 128 mg/mL H2O stock to give a final concentration of 128 mg/mL. Rows 2–12 of a 96-well microtiter plate were filled (100 mL per well) from the remaining 3 mL bacterial subcultures, allowing the concentration of compound to be kept uniform throughout the antibiotic dilution procedure. After standing for 10 min, aliquots (200 mL) of the samples containing antibiotic were distributed to the corresponding first-row wells of the microtiter plate. Row 1 wells were mixed six to eight times, and then 100 µL were transferred to row 2. Row 2 wells were mixed six to eight times, followed by a 100 µL transfer from row 2 to row 3. This procedure was repeated to serially dilute the rest of the rows of the microtiter plate, with the exception of the final row, to which no antibiotic was added (to check for growth of bacteria in the presence of compound alone). The plate was then covered and incubated under stationary conditions at 37 °C. After 16 h, MIC values were recorded as the lowest concentration of antibiotic at which no visible growth of bacteria was observed. To ensure that the compounds were non-toxic growth curve analysis was performed at the tested concentrations in MHB as described above, from a starting inoculation of 5×105 CFU/mL.
Supplementary Material
Scheme 1.
Preparation of 2-aminopyrimidines via Sonogashira coupling
Scheme 2.
Preparation of 2nd generation 2-aminopyrimidines
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank the NIH (GM GM055769) for financial support.
Footnotes
Electronic Supplementary Information (ESI) available: Experimental protocols for the synthesis and biological assays, characterization data for new compounds, and representative biofilm inhibition dose response curves and bacterial growth curves are displayed in the ESI. See DOI: 10.1039/b000000x/
References
- 1.Donlan RM, Costerton JW. Clin.Microbiol. Rev. 2002;15:167. doi: 10.1128/CMR.15.2.167-193.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Rasmussen TB, Givskov M. Int. J. Med. Microbiol. 2006;296:149–161. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmm.2006.02.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Davies D. Nat. Rev. Drug Discovery. 2003;2:114–122. doi: 10.1038/nrd1008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Musk DJ, Hergenrother PJ. Curr. Med. Chem. 2006;13:2163. doi: 10.2174/092986706777935212. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Stewart PS, Costerton JW. Lancet. 2001;358:135. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(01)05321-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Mah TF, O’Toole GA. Trends in Microbiology. 2001;9:34–39. doi: 10.1016/s0966-842x(00)01913-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Costerton JW, Stewart PS, Greenberg EP. Science. 1999;284:1318. doi: 10.1126/science.284.5418.1318. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Richards JJ, Melander C. Chem Bio Chem. 2009;10:2287. doi: 10.1002/cbic.200900317. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Geske GD, O’Neill JC, Blackwell HE. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2008;37:1432. doi: 10.1039/b703021p. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Manefield M, Kjelleberg S, Givskov M. Curr. Med. Chem.: Anti-Infect. Agents. 2003;2:213. [Google Scholar]
- 10.Hentzer M, Wu H, Andersen JB, Riedel K, Rassmussen TB, Bagge N, Kumar N, Schembri MA, Song ZJ, Kristoffersen P, Manefield M, Costerton JW, Molin S, Eberl L, Steinberg P, Kjelleberg S, Hoiby N, Givskov M. EMBO J. 2003;22:3803. doi: 10.1093/emboj/cdg366. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Wu H, Song Z, Hentzer M, Andersen JB, Molin S, Givskov M, Hoiby N. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2004;53:1054. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkh223. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Rogers SA, Whitehead DC, Mullikin T, Melander C. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2010;8:3857. doi: 10.1039/c0ob00063a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Rogers SA, Lindsey EA, Whitehead DC, Mullikin T, Melander C. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2011;21(4):1257. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2010.12.057. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Bunders CA, Cavanagh J, Melander C. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2011;9:5476. doi: 10.1039/c1ob05605k. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Huigens RW, Richards JJ, Parise G, Ballard TE, Zeng W, Deora R, Melander C. JACS. 2007;129(22):6966. doi: 10.1021/ja069017t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Richards JJ, Huigens RW, Ballard TE, Basso A, Cavanagh J, Melander C. Chem. Comm. 2008;14:1698. doi: 10.1039/b719802g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Richards JJ, Ballard TE, Melander C. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2008;6:1356. doi: 10.1039/b719082d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Reyes S, Huigens RW, Su Z, Simon ML, Melander C. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2011;9:3041. doi: 10.1039/c0ob00925c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Su Z, Rogers SA, McCall WS, Smith AC, Ravishankar S, Mullikin T, Melander C. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2010;8:2814. doi: 10.1039/c001479f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Bunders C, Richards JJ, Melander C. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2010;20:3797. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2010.04.042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Peng L, DeSousa J, Su Z, Novak BM, Nevzorov AA, Garland E, Melander C. Chem. Comm. 2011;47:4896. doi: 10.1039/c1cc10691k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Harris T, Worthington RJ, Melander C. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2011;21:4516. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2011.05.123. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Ghannoum M, Abu Elteen K, el-Rayyes NR. Microbios. 1989;60:23. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Fioravanti R, Biava M, Porretta GC, Landolfi C, Simonetti N, Villa A, Conte E, Porta-Puglia A. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 1995;30:123. [Google Scholar]
- 25.Steenackers HPL, Ermolat’ev DS, Savaliya B, De Weerdt A, De Coster D, Shah A, Van der Eycken EV, De Vos DE, Vanderleyden J, De Keersmaecker SCJ. J. Med. Chem. 2011;54:472. doi: 10.1021/jm1011148. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.O’Toole GA, Kolter R. Mol. Microbiol. 1998:30, 295. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.1998.01062.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Rogers SA, Melander C. ACIE. 2008;47(28):5229. doi: 10.1002/anie.200800862. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Reed CS, Huigens RW, Rogers SA, Melander C. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2010;20(21):6310. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2010.08.075. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Ballard TE, Richards JJ, Wolfe AL, Melander C. Chemistry a European Journal. 2008;14(34):10745. doi: 10.1002/chem.200801419. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Cee VJ, Albrecht BK, Geuns-Meyer S, Hughes P, Bellon S, Bready James, Caenepeel S, Chaffee SC, Coxon A, Emery M, Fretland J, Gallant P, Gu Y, Hodous BL, Hoffman D, Johnson RE, Kendall R, Kim JL, Long AM, McGowan D, Morrison M, Olivieri PR, Patel VF, Polverino A, Powers D, Rose P, Wang L, Zhao H. J. Med. Chem. 2007;50:627. doi: 10.1021/jm061112p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Rogers SA, Huigens RW, Cavanagh J, Melander C. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. 2010;54(5):2112. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01418-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.CSLI. Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing; Twentieth Informational Supplement. No. 1. Vol. 30. Wayne, PA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; 2010. Jan, M100-S20. [Google Scholar]
- 33.Cee VJ, Albrecht BK, Geuns-Meyer S, Hughes P, Bellon S, Bready James, Caenepeel S, Chaffee SC, Coxon A, Emery M, Fretland J, Gallant P, Gu Y, Hodous BL, Hoffman D, Johnson RE, Kendall R, Kim JL, Long AM, McGowan D, Morrison M, Olivieri PR, Patel VF, Polverino A, Powers D, Rose P, Wang L, Zhao H. J. Med. Chem. 2007;50:627. doi: 10.1021/jm061112p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Robins MJ, Nowak I, Rajwanshi VK, Miranda K, Cannon JF, Peterson MA, Andrei G, Snoeck R, De Clercq E, Balzarini J. J. Med. Chem. 2007;50:3897. doi: 10.1021/jm070210n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Hisamatsu Y, Shirai N, Ikeda S, Odashima K. Org. Lett. 2009;11:4342. doi: 10.1021/ol9017084. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Bingwei Vera Yang, Lidia M Doweyko, Wayne Vaccaro, Tram N Huynh, David R Tortolani, Dhar T Murali. From PCT Int. Appl. 2008 WO 2008057862 A2 20080515. [Google Scholar]
- 37.Stoll I, Brodbeck R, Neumann B, Stammler H, Mattay J. CrystEngComm. 2009;11:306. [Google Scholar]
- 38.Mrinalkanti Kundo, Neelima Khairatkar-Joshi, Suhas M Nadkarni, Rameswar Madhavrao Pansare, Pallavi V Karnik. PCT Int. Appl. 2007 WO 2007096764 A2 20070830. [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.