Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Heart Rhythm. 2012 Nov 24;10(3):401–408. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2012.11.014

Common genetic variation near the connexin-43 gene is associated with resting heart rate in African Americans: A genome-wide association study of 13,372 participants

R Deo 1, MA Nalls 2, CL Avery 3, JG Smith 4,5, DS Evans 6, MF Keller 7,8, AM Butler 9, SG Buxbaum 10,11, G Li 12, P Miguel Quibrera 13, EN Smith 14,15, T Tanaka 16, EL Akylbekova 17, A Alonso 18, DE Arking 19, EJ Benjamin 20,21,22,23, GS Berenson 24, JC Bis 25, LY Chen 26, W Chen 27, SR Cummings 28, PT Ellinor 29,30, MK Evans 31, L Ferrucci 32, ER Fox 33, SR Heckbert 34, G Heiss 35, WC Hsueh 36, KF Kerr 37, MC Limacher 38, Y Liu 39, SA Lubitz 40, JW Magnani 41,42, R Mehra 43, GM Marcus 44, SS Murray 45, AB Newman 46, O Njajou 47, KE North 48,49, DN Paltoo 50, BM Psaty 51,52, SS Redline 53, AP Reiner 54, JG Robinson 55, JI Rotter 56, TE Samdarshi 57, RB Schnabel 58, NJ Schork 59, AB Singleton 60, D Siscovick 61, EZ Soliman 62, N Sotoodehnia 63, SR Srinivasan 64, HA Taylor 65, M Trevisan 66, Z Zhang 67, AB Zonderman 68,69, C Newton-Cheh 70,71,72, EA Whitsel 73
PMCID: PMC3718037  NIHMSID: NIHMS424738  PMID: 23183192

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Genome-wide association studies have identified several genetic loci associated with variation in resting heart rate in European and Asian populations. No study has evaluated genetic variants associated with heart rate in African Americans.

OBJECTIVE

To identify novel genetic variants associated with resting heart rate in African Americans.

METHODS

Ten cohort studies participating in the Candidate-gene Association Resource and Continental Origins and Genetic Epidemiology Network consortia performed genome-wide genotyping of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and imputed 2,954,965 SNPs using HapMap YRI and CEU panels in 13,372 participants of African ancestry. Each study measured the RR interval (ms) from 10-second resting 12-lead electrocardiograms and estimated RR-SNP associations using covariate-adjusted linear regression. Random-effects meta-analysis was used to combine cohort-specific measures of association and identify genome-wide significant loci (P ≤ 2.5 × 10−8).

RESULTS

Fourteen SNPs on chromosome 6q22 exceeded the genome-wide significance threshold. The most significant association was for rs9320841 (+13 ms per minor allele; P = 4.98 × 10−15). This SNP was approximately 350 kb downstream of GJA1, a locus previously identified as harboring SNPs associated with heart rate in Europeans. Adjustment for rs9320841 also attenuated the association between the remaining 13 SNPs in this region and heart rate. In addition, SNPs in MYH6, which have been identified in European genome-wide association study, were associated with similar changes in the resting heart rate as this population of African Americans.

CONCLUSIONS

An intergenic region downstream of GJA1 (the gene encoding connexin 43, the major protein of the human myocardial gap junction) and an intragenic region within MYH6 are associated with variation in resting heart rate in African Americans as well as in populations of European and Asian origin.

Keywords: African Americans, Heart rate, Single nucleotide polymorphisms, Meta-analysis

Introduction

Multiple studies have found that an elevated resting heart rate is associated with mortality risk15 including that attributable to sudden cardiac death6 and cardiovascular disease.7 These findings suggest that the function of the sinus node, the dominant pacemaker in the heart, and the autonomic nervous system are associated with adverse clinical outcomes.

Although nongenetic influences of nodal and autonomic function are well known,8 genetic factors account for 26%–32% of the variation in resting heart rate in populations of European and Asian ancestry.911 Genome-wide association studies (GWASs) conducted in populations of European and Asian ancestry have recently identified single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with resting heart rate at several loci including GJA1 on chromosome 6, MYH6 on chromosome 14, CD34 on chromosome 1, and GPR133 on chromosome 12.1215 To the best of our knowledge, however, no study has evaluated the association of genetic variants with heart rate among populations of African descent. Such populations have greater genetic diversity compared to those of European and Asian origin, which may facilitate identification of additional associated loci.1618 It is also unclear whether loci identified in populations of European and Asian ancestry are relevant in populations of African descent.

In an attempt to identify new loci and evaluate existing, known associations, we examined the association of genetic variants with resting heart rate as measured by the RR interval on the electrocardiogram (ECG) among 10 African American cohort studies participating in the Candidate-gene Association Resource (CARe) and the Continental Origins and Genetic Epidemiology Network (COGENT) ECG consortia.

Methods

Study populations

The CARe19 and COGENT20 consortia included 13,372 self-reported African Americans meeting inclusion criteria. The participants originated in 10 cohort studies: the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities study (ARIC; n = 2391); Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging (BLSA; n = 155); Bogalusa Heart Study (BHS; n = 148); Cardiovascular Health Study (CHS; n = 674); Cleveland Family Study (CFS; n = 267); the Health, Aging, and Body Composition Study (Health ABC; n = 1054); the Healthy Aging in Neighborhoods of Diversity across the Life Span Study (HANDLS; n = 945); Jackson Heart Study (JHS; n = 1962); Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA; n = 1627); and Women’s Health Initiative clinical trials (WHI; n = 4149). Additional information is provided in the Supplemental Methods, including cohort-specific genotype and imputation quality control methods (see Online Supplements 1 and 2). Participants with missing covariates, poor-quality ECGs, pacemakers or implantable cardioverter-defibrillators, paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation, heart failure, myocardial infarction, second- or third-degree atrioventricular block, and extremes of heart rate (>100 or <50 beats/min) were excluded. Participants on medications altering nodal or atrioventricular conduction (beta-blockers, nondihydropyridine calcium channel blockers, digoxin, type I or III antiarrhythmics) were also excluded.

The study was approved by the institutional review boards at each participating center. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants.

ECG recordings

A standard 10-second, resting ECG was obtained and recorded digitally on all participants from the 10 cohorts included in this analysis. Standard 12-lead positions were recorded at baseline in all cohort studies using a Marquette MAC PC, MAC6, or MAC1200 ECG machine system (GE Healthcare, Milwaukee, WI). The RR interval (ms) was measured electronically as the unit-corrected inverse of heart rate (beat/min). All ECGs were processed automatically using GE Marquette 12-SL version 2001 running under GE Magellan Research Work Station or MC Means. The ECG software is Food and Drug Association approved. Heart rate was calculated from the median RR interval during the 10-second recording. Since ECG recordings were simultaneous in all 12 leads, the rate was not affected by the lead from which the RR interval was recorded. The automated nature of calculating heart rate from the median RR interval ensures the highest repeatability with no inter- or intraobserver variability. Poor-quality ECGs were excluded by software algorithms. As an added quality control measure, all ECGs were visually checked.

After a filtering process that results in signal conditioning and averaging, the program generates a median complex. All QRSs of the same shape are aligned in time and the interval measurements depend on the proper identification of fiduciary points, which are determined from an analysis of all 12 leads simultaneously. The intervals are then measured according to published standards.21

Genotyping and quality control

Genome-wide SNP genotyping was performed within each cohort using genotyping arrays from Affymetrix or Illumina (Online Supplement 2). Studies underwent similar quality control procedures (specific details in the Online Supplemental Materials). DNA samples with an array-wide genotyping success rate <95% were excluded. Autosomal heterozygosity rates were estimated to identify and exclude samples with poor DNA quality or contamination. Duplicated or contaminated samples were identified from identity by descent estimates and excluded. In addition, SNPs with a genotyping success rate <90% per SNP within each cohort, SNPs that map to multiple locations, SNPs where missingness could be predicted from surrounding haplotypes, and SNPs associated with chemistry plates were excluded. African ancestry was confirmed through either principal components22 or multidimensional scaling analyses. Population-based (ie, non-family-based) studies used identity-by-descent (IBD) estimates to exclude cryptically related individuals. Subsequent identical SNP filters after imputation and GWAS analyses were applied to summary statistics at the meta-analysis level.

Imputation and quality control

SNP imputation was performed in each cohort to facilitate the combination of results from different genotyping platforms and to increase genotype coverage. Genotyped SNPs passing quality control metrics described above and reference haplotypes from HapMap Phase 2 (release 22 on NCBI build 36) were used to impute approximately 2.5 million SNPs using MACH v1.1623 or BEAGLE. Untyped SNPs were imputed using a 1:1 ratio of CEU/YRI HapMap reference haplotypes based on consistency across other CARe-COGENT studies. Imputed SNPs were excluded if imputation quality was below 0.30 as reported by MACH or BEAGLE.

Statistical analysis

GWAS analysis was performed in either PLINK (ARIC, BHS, CHS, JHS, WHI), R (HANDLS, Health ABC, MESA), ProbA-BEL (WHI), or MERLIN (BLSA) using linear regression with an additive genetic model based on allelic dosages accounting for imputation uncertainty. The family-based CFS study was analyzed using linear mixed-effects models as implemented in the GWAF package for R.24 Pedigrees for CFS were confirmed using identity by state or IBD estimates from PREST-Plus (http://www.utstat.utoronto.ca/sun/Software/Prest/). Previously published analyses indicated that the inclusion of related individuals from the JHS family-based subcohort had little effect on P-value inflation.20 As a result, these related individuals were included in the present analysis. Eigenvectors were used to adjust for global ancestry in population substructures. Principal components were used to adjust for global ancestry in population stratification.

Cohort-specific genome-wide association was examined on a SNP-by-SNP basis using simple linear models regressing RR (ms) on allele dosage, age, sex, body mass index, global measures of African ancestry, and, when relevant, study site. Cohort-specific SNP association estimates were combined using fixed- and random-effects meta-analysis, the latter to examine potential effects of among-cohort heterogeneity on the combined estimates and the extent to which it can support qualitative inference to other African American populations. Given evidence of greater genetic and geographical diversity across African American cohorts compared to Europeans and initial evidence of heterogeneity across studies, random-effects estimates, which have wider 95% confidence intervals than do fixed-effects estimates, were reported in the current meta-analysis. Genomic control methods were applied when study-specific and combined distributions of test statistics suggested early departure from the null (λ > 1). Genomic inflation factors were evaluated in each cohort before the random-effects meta-analysis and in the combined results.25 We calculated X2 estimates of homogeneity (Cochran’s Q) using METAL and I2 estimates with R. Prior to conducting meta-analyses, SNP results with a minor allele frequency <0.01 or imputation quality scores <0.3 were excluded. In addition, SNPs not seen in >2 studies were excluded from the meta-analyses.

To confirm that the random-effects model was not overly conservative, standard fixed-effects meta-analyses were conducted on SNP association estimates for each cohort using METAL (and incorporating genomic control at the meta-analysis level). For the meta-analysis, we prespecified a genome-wide significance threshold of 2.5 × 10−8 as suggested for populations of African ancestry,26 accounting for approximately 2 million independent common variant tests. Other polymorphisms that were detected at the same locus as the initial SNP were subsequently analyzed in conditional regression models to assess statistical independence. Finally, SNPs that have been identified in prior GWAS but not in the discovery phase of our analysis were evaluated using a less stringent threshold. Specifically, we evaluated 13 genome-wide significant SNPs described by prior RR GWAS in individuals of European and Asian ancestry1315 using a significance level of 3.85 × 10−3 (Bonferroni corrected P value calculated as 0.05/13).

Results

This GWAS of the RR interval included 13,372 adults of African descent from 10 cohort studies. Each study contributed a widely varying number of participants (range 148–4149). The ARIC, JHS, and WHI studies accounted for the majority of participants in this analysis: 8502 (64%) of 13,372. On average, the study population was middle-aged (mean 56.5 years; range 35–73 years) and overweight (mean body mass index 30.8 kg/m2) and 71% were women.

Genomic inflation was minimal in most studies and modest in the family-based CFS (λ 1.070) and JHS (λ 1.071) (Table 1). Specifically, the lambda estimates from the random-effects meta-analysis did not suggest inflation of the test statistic (0.868), and the secondary fixed-effects modeling did not show a significant departure from null expectations (λ 1.017) (Figures 1A and 1B).

Table 1.

Description of contributing African American cohort studies

Cohort study n Age (y) Sex: Male (%) BMI (kg/m2) HR (beat/min) RR interval (ms) λ
ARIC 2391 53.3 (5.8) 39 29.4 (6.1) 67 (10) 896 1.023
BLSA 155 64.4 (11.4) 37 28.3 (5.2) 63 (8) 952 1.050
BHS 148 35.7 (4.8) 33 31.7 (8.9) 68 (11) 882 1.004
CHS 674 72.8 (5.6) 35 28.4 (5.5) 67 (11) 896 1.005
CFS 267 42.7 (14.9) 43 34.4 (9.3) 69 (9) 875 1.070
Health ABC 1054 73.4 (2.9) 45 28.1 (5.3) 66 (8) 909 0.996
HANDLS 945 48.5 (9.0) 44 29.9 (8.1) 67 (11) 896 1.007
JHS 1962 49.3 (11.8) 37 32.4 (7.8) 66 (10) 909 1.071
MESA 1627 61.5 (10.1) 46 30.2 (5.9) 65 (9) 923 1.003
WHI 4149 61.7 (6.9) 0 31.6 (6.2) 66 (8) 909 1.017
All studies* 13372 56.5 29 30.8 66.3 906 1.029

Mean (standard deviation) is tabulated for age, body mass index (BMI), and heart rate (HR).

ARIC = Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities study; BHS = Bogalusa Heart Study; BLSA = Baltimore Longitudinal Study on Aging; CFS = Cleveland Family Study; CHS = Cardiovascular Health Study; HANDLS = Healthy Aging in Neighborhoods of Diversity across the Life Span Study; Health ABC = Health Aging and Body Composition; JHS = Jackson Heart Study; MESA = Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis; WHI = Women’s Health Initiative clinical trials.

*

Sum (n), % (male), and weighted mean (age; BMI; HR; RR interval; λ) across studies.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

QQ plots of meta-analysis using either random-effects (A) or fixed-effects (B) modeling. The x axis marks the expected values, and the left-hand y axis marks the observed values. A line originating from the origin and having a slope of 1 is depicted in red.

A total of 2,954,965 SNPs were incorporated into this meta-analysis after data quality control. Fourteen SNPs at a largely intergenic region on chromosome 6q22 (Figure 2) reached genome-wide significance. The most significant association at this locus was for rs9320841 (+13 ms per minor allele, standard error 1.7 ms, random effects P = 4.98 × 10−15). This SNP is located in a noncoding region, 350 kb downstream from GJA1 and 64 kb upstream from HMGB3P18. The magnitude and direction of the association were similar across most cohorts (Pheterogeneity = .45) as shown in Figure 3. None of the other 13 SNPs in this region were independent variants associated with resting heart rate. The results for the regional association plot at the GJA1 locus are depicted in Figure 4. This plot covers 1000 kb of the genomic region associated with the GJA1 locus and demonstrates strong linkage disequilibrium (LD) with other SNPs in this gene cluster that were associated with variations in heart rate. Adjustment for rs9320841, however, eliminated the significance of these additional SNPs.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Manhattan plot of RR associations for all SNPs. The P values from random-effects meta-analysis of 2,954,965 successfully imputed or genotyped SNPs in ≥2 cohorts. Red points = SNPs with P < 2.5 × 10−8 (considered genome-wide significant). Orange points = SNPs with P values ranging from less than 1 × 10−5 to 2.5 × 10−8. Regions containing red points were considered genome-wide significant. SNP = single nucleotide polymorphism.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Forest plot depicting the effect (beta coefficient) of rs9320841 on RR in milliseconds per allele (95% confidence interval) across the individual cohort studies and overall using random-effects modeling (I2 = 0). ARIC = Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities study; BHS = Bogalusa Heart Study; BLSA = Baltimore Longitudinal Study on Aging; CFS = Cleveland Family Study; CHS = Cardiovascular Health Study; HANDLS = Healthy Aging in Neighborhoods of Diversity across the Life Span Study; Health ABC = Health Aging and Body Composition; JHS = Jackson Heart Study; MESA = Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis; WHI = Women’s Health Initiative clinical trials.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Regional association plots for the RR interval plotted using P values estimated from 13,372 African Americans from 10 studies. Positions are from NCBI build 36. Linkage disequilibrium and recombination rates are estimated from HapMap phase II data. SNPs are represented by circles. The large blue diamond is the SNP with the lowest P value. The circle color represents correlation with the top SNP: blue indicates weak correlation, and red indicates strong correlation. Recombination rate is plotted in the background, and known genes in the region are shown at the bottom of the plot. SNP = single nucleotide polymorphism.

We also evaluated a series of SNPs from the chromosome 6q22 locus that were identified in prior European and Asian GWAS. Both rs9398652 and rs12110693 in the 6q22 locus were associated with the RR interval, which were similar to estimates reported in prior studies of Asian14 and European13 populations; however, only rs9398652 reached genome-wide significance in the current meta-analysis. The rs9398652 SNP was approximately 30 kb downstream and in high linkage disequilibrium with the leading SNP from the present study (rs9320841; CEU r2 = 1.00; YRI r2 = .81). In addition, rs12110693 was in strong linkage disequilibrium with rs9320841 (rs9320841; CEU r2 = 1.00; YRI r2 = .76) (Table 2). The final reported SNP from the 6q22 locus, rs11154022, did not reach genome-wide significance, was the greatest distance from rs9320841 (approximately 365 kb upstream), and not in LD with it (CEU r2 = .01; YRI r2 = .01).

Table 2.

Analysis of the SNPs reaching genome-wide significance in previous European and Asian studies

SNP Chr Locus Position (build 36) Minor/major allele MAF Random-effects analysis
Fixed-effects analysis
I2 Previous studies
β (SE) P β (SE) P Reference β (SE) P from publication
rs12731740 1q32 CD46, C1orf132, CD34 206091443 T/C 0.03 −6.4 (8.2) 1.0 −6.3 (8.2) .45 65.6 Cho 2009 −14.0 (2.3) 2.9 × 10−9
rs12110693 6q22 GJA1, HMGB3P18 122199969 A/G 0.49 −11.4 (1.6) 1.4 × 10−7 −12.4 (1.7) 2.0 × 10−13 6.4 Cho 2009 −8.6 (1.4) 1.6 × 10−9
rs9398652 6q22 GJA1, HMGB3P18 122187733 A/C 0.49 −12.8 (1.7) 1.1 × 10−13 −12.7 (1.7) 6.8 × 10−14 2.6 Eijgelsheim 2010 −12.6 (1.6) 7.7 × 10−16
rs11154022 6q22 GJA1, HMGB3P18 121790241 A/G 0.13 4.0 (2.8) .2 3.9 (2.8) .2 0 Eijgelsheim 2010 5.8 (1.1) 3.5 × 10−8
rs281868 6q22 SLC35F1 118680754 A/G 0.44 1.3 (1.8) .4 1.4 (1.8) .4 0 Eijgelsheim 2010 −6.3 (1.0) 1.5 × 10−10
rs314370 7q22 SLC12A9 100291144 C/T 0.06 −9.4 (3.9) .01 −9.4 (3.9) .02 0 Eijgelsheim 2010 −7.6 (1.2) 2.3 × 10−10
rs12666989 7q22 UfSp1 100324690 C/G 0.068 −9.4 (3.6) .007 −9.4 (3.6) .008 0 Eijgelsheim 2010 −7.0 (1.2) 9.4 × 10−9
rs174547 11q12 FADS1 61327359 C/T 0.09 −5.1 (3.0) .1 −4.2 (3.2) .2 8.01 Eijgelsheim 2010 −6.2 (1.0) 8.2 × 10−10
rs17287293 12p12 Intergenic 24662145 G/A 0.05 1.36 (1.2) .8 −3.2 (4.4) .5 37.7 Eijgelsheim 2010 8.6 (1.3) 5.7 × 10−11
rs885389 12q24 GPR133 130187715 A/G 0.34 2.2 (1.6) .3 1.1 (1.8) .6 0 Marroni 2009 −14.0 (2.5) 3.9 × 10−8
rs452036 14q12 MYH6 22935725 G/A 0.38 9.5 (2.0) 1.8 × 10−4 9.6 (2.0) 7.8 × 10−7 30.9 Eijgelsheim 2010 7.8 (1.0) 8.1 × 10−15
rs365990 14q12 MYH6 22931651 A/G 0.38 9.8 (2.0) 7.7 × 10−5 9.8 (2.0) 8.9 × 10−7 26.5 Eijgelsheim 2010
Holm 2010
7.7 (1.0) 5.4 × 10−14
rs223116 14q12 MYH7, NDNG 23046850 G/A 0.23 4.3 (2.2) .05 4.3 (2.2) .05 0 Eijgelsheim 2010 7.4 (1.3) 1.1 × 10−8
β

(SE) = difference in RR interval duration per minor allele (standard error), in milliseconds; Chr = chromosome; MAF = minor allele frequency; SNP = single nucleotide polymorphism.

Other variants that were identified from prior European and Asian GWAS were also tested (Table 2). The 2 SNPs that have previously been identified at the MYH6 locus (rs452036 and rs365990) were associated with resting heart rate in African Americans using the replication threshold (3.85 × 10−3). These variants are associated with a similar increase in the sinus cycle length across Europeans, Asians, and African Americans. We were unable to confirm associations for several previously published loci at replication thresholds: CD46 on chromosome 1, SLC35F1 on chromosome 6, SLC12A9 and UfSp1 on chromosome 7, FADS1 on chromosome 11, an intergenic region on chromosome 12, GPR133 on chromosome 12, and MYH7 on chromosome 14 (Table 2). These findings were consistent across the different cohorts analyzed through the CARe-COGENT consortium (Figure 5). Further evaluation of these loci (the 1 Mb regions, 500 kb upstream and downstream of the SNPs in Table 2) did not identify any other genome-wide significant RR-SNP associations despite having adequate power (power > 0.8).

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Forest plot depicting the effect in milliseconds per allele of SNPs achieving genome-wide significance in European and Asian studies across the individual African American cohorts. SNP = single nucleotide polymorphism.

Discussion

In a large GWAS of African Americans, we generalized a previously reported association between a variant on chromosome 6q22.31 and resting heart rate to a population of African descent. The present findings suggest that rs9320841, which is located in an intergenic region 350 kb downstream from GJA1, is the leading SNP at this locus associated with heart rate. In addition, rs9320841 is in high LD with other intergenic SNPs from this region previously associated with heart rate in GWAS in populations of European and Asian ancestry.13,14

Multiple studies including the current report have demon strated intergenic SNPs in proximity to rs9320841 that are associated with variation in heart rate among individuals of Asian, European, and African ancestry. The closest putative transcript to rs9320841 on chromosome 6q22.31 is HMGB3P18, which has no known function. However, GJA1 which is approximately 350 kb upstream of this SNP, encodes connexin 43, the main cardiac gap junction channel that is found throughout the heart and is responsible for intercellular con ductance in the atria and ventricles.27 Connexin 43 is expressed abundantly in the atria and permits the node to conduct impulses to the surrounding muscle.28 Experimental models have demon strated that the deletion of various gap junction subunits results in a sick sinus syndrome phenotype with bradycardia, sinus dysrhythmia, and sinus node exit block.29,30 As a result, these intergenic variants in the 6q22 locus, which are in close proximity to GJA1 and have been identified across different populations, may reduce sinus automaticity.

Although rs9320841 and previously identified 6q22.31 loci are 300–500 kb away from and in low LD with SNPs in GJA1 recent studies suggest that variations in intergenic regions may regulate transcription factor binding and chromatin modifica tion.31 Functional and translational studies focused on this intergenic region on chromosome 6q22 will be required to understand its potential effect on GJA1.

In the portion of our study that restricted the analysis to previously identified variants, we observed an association between 2 SNPs located within the MYH6 gene and resting heart rate. MYH6 encodes one of the myosin heavy chain subunits in the cardiac sarcomere and is a major component of the cardiac contractile system. In addition, MYH6 encodes a cardiac-specific microRNA, miR-208a, which is a key regulatory molecule that is necessary for normal cardiac conduction.32 Specifically, miR-208a regulates expression of connexin 40, a gap junction protein that is implicated in sinus automaticity and cardiac arrhythmias.2933 As a result, changes in the MYH6 genetic architecture could alter microRNA production, gap junction formation, and sinus node function. Prior GWAS in European populations have identified common variants in this gene to be associated with resting heart rate13,15 and rare variants, located 0.3–4.4 kb from these SNPs, to be associated with sick sinus syndrome.34 Although SNPs at the MYH6 locus were not identified in the discovery phase of our analysis at genome-wide significance thresholds (P < 2.5 × 10−8), the similar magnitude and direction of the point estimates in our analysis suggest that the MYH6 gene affects sinus node automaticity in diverse populations.

While we were unable to replicate associations for other previously published loci at a threshold level of 3.85 × 10−3 (0.05/13), the similar magnitude and direction of the point estimates suggest consistency across ancestries. Specifically, SLC12A9 and UfSp1 on chromosome 7 and the MYH7 region on chromosome 14 had effects on heart rate similar to those described by prior studies. Compared to individuals of European ancestry, however, African Americans have greater genetic diversity,18 which may lower the frequency of a particular allele and subsequently reduce the statistical likelihood of detecting an effect on the RR interval. In addition, linkage disequilibrium is commonly lower in African Americans35 and subsequently reduces the likelihood that a common SNP is in linkage disequilibrium with a causal variant. Furthermore, these analyses were conducted in a population that was predominantly woman, middle-aged, and overweight. This demographic profile differs from that of prior studies and may have influenced the results.

A common limitation of meta-analyses is among-study phenotype heterogeneity; however, the current study followed similar electrocardiographic and clinical protocols when measuring heart rate and its correlates. In addition, the statistical assessment of heterogeneity did not suggest large variation in SNP effects across studies. Moreover, the random-effects meta-analysis of these effects was weighted for both their within- and among-study variation. Another limitation of GWAS is potential for population stratification, including confounding by ancestry. However, we attempted to minimize bias from population structure by excluding participants of non-African ancestry, adjusting for principal components in study-specific regression models, and applying genomic control methods.

Conclusions

In summary, the genome-wide significance of an association linking resting heart rate and the GJA1 locus previously described in European and Asian populations has now been generalized to African Americans. In addition, this analysis has replicated associations initially discovered in Europeans between common variants within the MYH6 gene and a reduction in heart rate to an African American population. Generalizability across global populations and biological plausibility of the heart rate-GJA1 and heart rate-MYH6 associations highlight the potential importance of these loci in the intrinsic (nodal and myocardial) determination of resting heart rate.

Supplementary Material

01

Acknowledgments

Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC): The ARIC study is carried out as a collaborative study supported by National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) contracts to the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (N01-HC-55015), Baylor Medical College (N01-HC-55016), University of Mississippi Medical Center (N01-HC-55021), University of Minnesota (N01-HC-55019), Johns Hopkins University (N01-HC-55020), University of Texas, Houston (N01-HC-55022), and University of North Carolina, Forsyth County (N01-HC-55018). Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging (BLSA): The BLSA was supported in part by the Intramural Research Program of the National Institutes of Health (NIH), National Institute on Aging (NIA). A portion of that support was through an R&D contract with MedStar Research Institute. Bogalusa Heart Study (BHS): Dr Smith, Dr Murray, and Dr Schork were supported in part by NIH/National Center for Research Resources (NCRR) grant number UL1 RR025774 and Scripps Genomic Medicine. The BHS was supported by grants HD-061437 and HD-062783 from the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development and AG-16592 from the NIA. Cleveland Family Study (CFS): This study was supported by grant to Case Western Reserve University (NIH HL 46380, M01RR00080). Cardiovascular Health Study (CHS): This CHS research was supported by NHLBI contracts N01-HC-85239, N01-HC-85079 through N01-HC-85086, N01-HC-35129, N01 HC-15103, N01 HC-55222, N01-HC-75150, N01-HC-45133, and HHSN268201200036C and NHLBI grants HL080295, HL087652, HL105756, and HL085251 with additional contribution from National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS). Additional support was provided through AG-023629, AG-15928, AG-20098, and AG-027058 from the NIA. See also http://www.chs-nhlbi.org/pi.htm. DNA handling and genotyping were supported in part by National Center of Advancing Translational Technologies CTSI grant UL1TR000124 and National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases grant DK063491 to the Southern California Diabetes Endocrinology Research Center. The Health, Aging, and Body Composition (Health ABC) study: The Health ABC study was supported by NIA contracts N01AG62101, N01AG62103, and N01AG62106. The genome-wide association study was funded by NIA grant 1R01AG032098-01A1 to Wake Forest University Health Sciences and genotyping services were provided by the Center for Inherited Disease Research (CIDR). CIDR is fully funded through a federal contract from the NIH to Johns Hopkins University (contract number HHSN268200782096C). This research was supported in part by the Intramural Research Program of the NIH, NIA. The Healthy Aging in Neighborhoods of Diversity across the Life Span (HANDLS) study: This HANDLS study was supported by the Intramural Research Program of the NIH, NIA, and the National Center on Minority Health and Health Disparities (contract number Z01-AG000513 and human subjects protocol number 2009-149). Data analyses for the HANDLS study used the high-performance computational capabilities of the Biowulf Linux cluster at the NIH (http://biowulf.nih.gov). Jackson Heart Study (JHS): This JHS was supported by NIH contracts N01-HC-95170, N01-HC-95171, and N01-HC-95172 provided by the NHLIB and the National Center for Minority Health and Health Disparities. Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA): This study was supported by grants to the University of Washington (N01-HC-95159), Regents of the University of California (N01-HC-95160), Columbia University (N01-HC-95161), Johns Hopkins University (N01-HC-95162, N01-HC-95168), University of Minnesota (N01-HC95163), Northwestern University (N01-HC-95164), Wake Forest University (N01-HC-95165), University of Vermont (N01-HC-95166), New England Medical Center (N01-HC-95167), Harbor-UCLA Research and Education Institute (N01-HC-95169), Cedars-Sinai Medical Center (R01-HL-071205), and University of Virginia (subcontract to R01-HL-071205). Women’s Health Initiative (WHI): The WHI program is funded by the NHLBI, NIH, US Department of Health and Human Services through contracts N01WH22110, 24152, 32100-2, 32105-6, 32108-9, 32111-13, 32115, 32118-32119, 32122, 42107-26, 42129-32, and 44221. This article was prepared in collaboration with the investigators of WHI and has been reviewed and/or approved by WHI. WHI investigators are listed at http://www.whiscience.org/publications/WHI_investigators_shortlist.pdf. Funding for WHI SHARe genotyping was provided by NHLBI contract N02-HL-64278. Analyses in WHI were funded by the NIH/NIEHS (1-R01-ES017794, Whitsel) and the NIH/NCI (N01-WH-2-2110, North). Dr Deo was supported by K23DK089118 from the NIH. Dr Avery was partially supported by NHLBI/NIH grant R00HL098458. Dr Smith was supported by the Swedish Heart-Lung Foundation.

ABBREVIATIONS

ARIC

Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities study

BHS

Bogalusa Heart Study

BLSA

Baltimore Longitudinal Study on Aging

CFS

Cleveland Family Study

CHS

Cardiovascular Health Study

CARe

Candidate-gene Association Resource

COGENT

Continental Origins and Genetic Epidemiology Network

ECG

electrocardiogram

HANDLS

Healthy Aging in Neighborhoods of Diversity across the Life Span Study

Health ABC

Health Aging and Body Composition

GWAS

genome-wide association study

JHS

Jackson Heart Study

MESA

Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis

SNP

single nucleotide polymorphism

WHI

Women’s Health Initiative clinical trials

Appendix A Supplementary data

Supplementary data associated with this article can be found in the online version at http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2012.11.014.

Footnotes

The first 5 authors should be regarded as first authors.

References

  • 1.Greenland P, Daviglus ML, Dyer AR, et al. Resting heart rate is a risk factor for cardiovascular and noncardiovascular mortality: the Chicago Heart Association Detection Project in Industry. Am J Epidemiol. 1999;149:853–862. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009901. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Nauman J, Nilsen TI, Wisloff U, Vatten LJ. Combined effect of resting heart rate and physical activity on ischaemic heart disease: mortality follow-up in a population study (the HUNT study, Norway) J Epidemiol Community Health. 2010;64:175–181. doi: 10.1136/jech.2009.093088. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Kristal-Boneh E, Silber H, Harari G, Froom P. The association of resting heart rate with cardiovascular, cancer and all-cause mortality: eight year follow-up of 3527 male Israeli employees (the CORDIS Study) Eur Heart J. 2000;21:116–124. doi: 10.1053/euhj.1999.1741. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Chang M, Havlik RJ, Corti MC, Chaves PH, Fried LP, Guralnik JM. Relation of heart rate at rest and mortality in the Women’s Health and Aging Study. Am J Cardiol. 2003;92:1294–1299. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2003.08.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Jouven X, Empana JP, Escolano S, et al. Relation of heart rate at rest and long-term (>20 years) death rate in initially healthy middle-aged men. Am J Cardiol. 2009;103:279–283. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2008.08.071. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Jouven X, Zureik M, Desnos M, Guerot C, Ducimetiere P. Resting heart rate as a predictive risk factor for sudden death in middle-aged men. Cardiovasc Res. 2001;50:373–378. doi: 10.1016/s0008-6363(01)00230-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Fox K, Borer JS, Camm AJ, et al. Resting heart rate in cardiovascular disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;50:823–830. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.04.079. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Osztovits J, Horvath T, Littvay L, et al. Effects of genetic vs. environmental factors on cardiovascular autonomic function: a twin study. Diabet Med. 2011;28:1241–1248. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2011.03363.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Russell MW, Law I, Sholinsky P, Fabsitz RR. Heritability of ECG measurements in adult male twins. J Electrocardiol. 1998;30:64–68. doi: 10.1016/s0022-0736(98)80034-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Singh JP, Larson MG, O’Donnell CJ, Tsuji H, Evans JC, Levy D. Heritability of heart rate variability: the Framingham Heart Study. Circulation. 1999;99:2251–2254. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.99.17.2251. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Martin LJ, Comuzzie AG, Sonnenberg GE, et al. Major quantitative trait locus for resting heart rate maps to a region on chromosome 4. Hypertension. 2004;43:1146–1151. doi: 10.1161/01.HYP.0000122873.42047.17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Marroni F, Pfeufer A, Aulchenko YS, et al. A genome-wide association scan of RR and QT interval duration in 3 European genetically isolated populations: the EUROSPAN project. Circ Cardiovasc Genet. 2009;2:322–328. doi: 10.1161/CIRCGENETICS.108.833806. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Eijgelsheim M, Newton-Cheh C, Sotoodehnia N, et al. Genome-wide association analysis identifies multiple loci related to resting heart rate. Hum Mol Genet. 2010;19:3885–3894. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddq303. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Cho YS, Go MJ, Kim YJ, et al. A large-scale genome-wide association study of Asian populations uncovers genetic factors influencing eight quantitative traits. Nat Genet. 2009;41:527–534. doi: 10.1038/ng.357. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Holm H, Gudbjartsson DF, Arnar DO, et al. Several common variants modulate heart rate, PR interval and QRS duration. Nat Genet. 2010;42:117–122. doi: 10.1038/ng.511. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.A haplotype map of the human genome. Nature. 2005;437:1299–1320. doi: 10.1038/nature04226. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Tishkoff SA, Williams SM. Genetic analysis of African populations: human evolution and complex disease. Nat Rev Genet. 2002;3:611–621. doi: 10.1038/nrg865. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Tennessen JA, Bigham AW, O’Connor TD, et al. Evolution and functional impact of rare coding variation from deep sequencing of human exomes. Science. 2012;337:64–69. doi: 10.1126/science.1219240. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Musunuru K, Lettre G, Young T, et al. Candidate gene association resource (CARe): design, methods, and proof of concept. Circ Cardiovasc Genet. 2010;3:267–275. doi: 10.1161/CIRCGENETICS.109.882696. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Reiner AP, Lettre G, Nalls MA, et al. Genome-wide association study of white blood cell count in 16,388 African Americans: the continental origins and genetic epidemiology network (COGENT) PLoS Genet. 2011;7:e1002108. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.The CSE Working Party. Recommendations for measurement standards in quantitative electrocardiography. Eur Heart J. 1985;6:815–825. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Price AL, Patterson NJ, Plenge RM, Weinblatt ME, Shadick NA, Reich D. Principal components analysis corrects for stratification in genome-wide association studies. Nat Genet. 2006;38:904–909. doi: 10.1038/ng1847. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Li Y, Willer C, Sanna S, Abecasis G. Genotype imputation. Annu Rev Genom Hum Genet. 2009;10:387–406. doi: 10.1146/annurev.genom.9.081307.164242. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Chen MH, Yang Q. GWAF: an R package for genome-wide association analyses with family data. Bioinformatics. 2010;26:580–581. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp710. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Devlin B, Roeder K. Genomic control for association studies. Biometrics. 1999;55:997–1004. doi: 10.1111/j.0006-341x.1999.00997.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Pe’er I, Yelensky R, Altshuler D, Daly MJ. Estimation of the multiple testing burden for genomewide association studies of nearly all common variants. Genet Epidemiol. 2008;32:381–385. doi: 10.1002/gepi.20303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Gros DB, Jongsma HJ. Connexins in mammalian heart function. Bioessays. 1996;18:719–730. doi: 10.1002/bies.950180907. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Boyett MR, Inada S, Yoo S, et al. Connexins in the sinoatrial and atrioventricular nodes. Adv Cardiol. 2006;42:175–197. doi: 10.1159/000092569. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Hagendorff A, Schumacher B, Kirchhoff S, Luderitz B, Willecke K. Conduction disturbances and increased atrial vulnerability in connexin40-deficient mice analyzed by transesophageal stimulation. Circulation. 1999;99:1508–1515. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.99.11.1508. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Dobrzynski H, Boyett MR, Anderson RH. New insights into pacemaker activity: promoting understanding of sick sinus syndrome. Circulation. 2007;115:1921–1932. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.616011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Harismendy O, Notani D, Song X, et al. 9p21 DNA variants associated with coronary artery disease impair interferon-gamma signalling response. Nature. 2011;470:264–268. doi: 10.1038/nature09753. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Callis TE, Pandya K, Seok HY, et al. Microrna-208a is a regulator of cardiac hypertrophy and conduction in mice. J Clin Invest. 2009;119:2772–2786. doi: 10.1172/JCI36154. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Simon AM, Goodenough DA, Paul DL. Mice lacking connexin40 have cardiac conduction abnormalities characteristic of atrioventricular block and bundle branch block. Curr Biol. 1998;8:295–298. doi: 10.1016/s0960-9822(98)70113-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Holm H, Gudbjartsson DF, Sulem P, et al. A rare variant in MYH6 is associated with high risk of sick sinus syndrome. Nat Genet. 2011;43:316–320. doi: 10.1038/ng.781. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Rosenberg NA, Huang L, Jewett EM, Szpiech ZA, Jankovic I, Boehnke M. Genome-wide association studies in diverse populations. Nat Rev Genet. 2010;11:356–366. doi: 10.1038/nrg2760. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

01

RESOURCES