Abstract
Endothelial-myocardial interactions may be critically important for ischemia/reperfusion injury. Tetrahydrobiopterin (BH4) is a required cofactor for nitric oxide (NO) production by endothelial NO synthase (eNOS). Hyperglycemia (HG) leads to significant increases in oxidative stress, oxidizing BH4 to enzymatically incompetent dihydrobiopterin. How alterations in endothelial BH4 content impact myocardial ischemia/reperfusion injury remains elusive. The aim of this study was to examine the effect of endothelial-myocardial interaction on ischemia/reperfusion injury, with an emphasis on the role of endothelial BH4 content. Langendorff-perfused mouse hearts were treated by triton X-100 to produce endothelial dysfunction and subsequently subjected to 30 min of ischemia followed by 2 h of reperfusion. The recovery of left ventricular systolic and diastolic function during reperfusion was impaired in triton X-100 treated hearts compared with vehicle-treated hearts. Cardiomyocytes (CMs) were co-cultured with endothelial cells (ECs) and subsequently subjected to 2 h of hypoxia followed by 2 h of reoxygenation. Addition of ECs to CMs at a ratio of 1∶3 significantly increased NO production and decreased lactate dehydrogenase activity compared with CMs alone. This EC-derived protection was abolished by HG. The addition of 100 µM sepiapterin (a BH4 precursor) or overexpression of GTP cyclohydrolase 1 (the rate-limiting enzyme for BH4 biosynthesis) in ECs by gene trasfer enhanced endothelial BH4 levels, the ratio of eNOS dimer/monomer, eNOS phosphorylation, and NO production and decreased lactate dehydrogenase activity in the presence of HG. These results demonstrate that increased BH4 content in ECs by either pharmacological or genetic approaches reduces myocardial damage during hypoxia/reoxygenation in the presence of HG. Maintaining sufficient endothelial BH4 is crucial for cardioprotection against hypoxia/reoxygenation injury.
Introduction
Hyperglycemia (HG) is common in patients suffering from acute coronary syndrome and is associated with poor prognosis and increased mortality rates. [1], [2] A series of interconnected biochemical changes initiated by HG have been documented to directly affect vascular and myocardial function resulting in the development of cardiovascular complications.[3]–[5] Endothelial dysfunction, characterized by a loss of nitric oxide (NO) bioactivity, is generally regarded as one of the most important cellular events accounting for the adverse effects of HG on the cardiovascular system.[6]–[10] It remains elusive how endothelial dysfunction caused by acute HG impacts the susceptibility of cardiomyocytes to ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) injury.
Endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) is highly expressed in the endothelial cells of the cardiac vasculature. [11], [12] eNOS enzyme consists of a heme-containing oxygenase domain that binds the essential co-factor tetrahydrobiopterin (BH4), molecular oxygen, and the substrate L-arginine; and a reductase domain that transfers electrons from NADPH to FAD and FMN. [13] In the presence of BH4 and L-arginine, heme and oxygen reduction are coupled to the synthesis of NO. In addition to its potent vasodilatory effect, eNOS-derived NO has been demonstrated to be cardioprotective.[14]–[19] However, HG leads to significant increases in oxidative stress, oxidizing BH4 to enzymatically incompetent dihydrobiopterin, which competes with BH4 for eNOS binding.[7], [20]–[23] When BH4 levels are inadequate, oxygen reduction by eNOS is uncoupled to L-arginine oxidation, resulting in the generation of the cardiotoxic mediator superoxide rather than NO. [24], [25] Therefore, in the present study, we tested the hypothesis that endothelial dysfunction exacerbates myocardial I/R injury, and that increased coronary vascular endothelial BH4 content by pharmacological and genetic approaches protects the cardiomyocyte (CM) against I/R injury during HG.
Materials and Methods
1. Animals
Male C57BL/6 mice (weight: 26.5±0.5 g; age: 9–12 weeks) and pregnant female Wistar rats (age: 9–12 weeks) were purchased from Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, ME, USA) and Charles River Laboratories International, Inc. (Wilmington, MA, USA), respectively. The animals were kept on a 12-h light-dark cycle in a temperature-controlled room. All experimental procedures used in this study were approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee of the Medical College of Wisconsin and conformed to the Guide for the Care and Use of laboratory Animals (NIH Publication No. 85-23, revised 1996).
2. Langendorff Perfusion of Mouse Heart
We have previously described Langendorff perfusion of mouse hearts.[22], [26]–[28] Briefly, once excised, the hearts were mounted on a Langendorff apparatus and perfused retrogradely through the aorta at a constant pressure of 80 mmHg with Krebs-Henseleit buffer containing (in mM) NaCl 118, NaHCO3 25, KCl 4.7, MgCl2 1.2, CaCl2 2.5, KH2PO4 1.2, EDTA 0.5, and glucose 11. The buffer was continuously bubbled with a mixture of 95% oxygen/5% carbon dioxide via an in-line filter (5 µm pore size). A fluid-filled plastic balloon was inserted into the chamber of the left ventricle (LV) via the mitral valve, and connected to a pressure transducer for continuous measurement of LV pressure. The hearts were immersed in perfusate maintained at 37.2±0.3°C, and the balloon was inflated to a diastolic pressure of ∼5 to 10 mmHg. Coronary flow was monitored by an in-line flow probe connected to a flow meter (Transonics Systems Inc., Ithaca, NY, USA). The LV pressure signal was monitored to obtain heart rate and LV dP/dt. The LV developed pressure (LVDP) was calculated as the difference between systolic and end-diastolic LV pressure. Global I/R was produced by cessation of perfusion followed by reperfusion at a designated time. Langendorff-perfused hearts were used in two protocols (Figure 1).
Protocol A
Previous studies demonstrated that the bolus injection of 1∶200 triton X-100 (TX-100, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) at 1% of coronary flow into the coronaries in Langendorff-perfused rat and rabbit hearts rendered the coronary endothelium dysfunctional.[29]–[31] However, equivalent amounts of TX-100 caused 7 out of 10 hearts to suffer irreversible contractile failure in Langendorff-perfused mouse hearts. Pilot experiments showed that the bolus administration of 1∶200 TX-100 at 0.3% of coronary flow did not cause myocardial contractile failure. Thus, we determined the effect of the endothelium-dependent vasodilator acetylcholine (Ach, Sigma-Aldrich) and endothelium-independent vasodilator nitroprusside (NP, Sigma-Aldrich) on coronary flow before and after the bolus injection of 1∶200 TX-100 at 0.3% of coronary flow in Langendorff-perfused C57BL/6 mouse hearts (Figure 1A). All hearts were perfused for 30 min for stabilization, and baseline coronary flow was recorded. Hearts were then randomly assigned to 4 groups (n = 5 hearts/group). In Group 1 and 2, the hearts were perfused with 0.5 µM Ach for 3 min followed by washout for 10 min. After a bolus injection of TX-100 or an equivalent amount of saline followed by washout for 30 min, the hearts were perfused with 0.5 µM Ach for 3 min followed by washout for 10 min again. In Group 3 and 4, the hearts were perfused with 30 µM NP for 3 min followed by washout for 10 min. After a bolus injection of TX-100 or saline followed by washout for 30 min, the hearts were perfused with 30 µM NP for 3 min followed by washout for 10 min.
Protocol B
To evaluate the effects of coronary endothelial dysfunction on cardiac function (Figure 1B), C57BL/6 mice were randomly assigned to 1 of the following 4 groups (n = 6–8 mice/group): (1) control; (2) TX-100; (3) I/R; and (4) I/R+TX-100. After stabilization for 30 min, the hearts in I/R and I/R+TX-100 groups were subjected to 30 min of global ischemia and 2 h of reperfusion with or without bolus injection of 1∶200 TX-100 at 0.3% of coronary flow. The hearts in control and TX-100 groups were not subjected to ischemia. LVDP, +dP/dt (maximum rate of increase of LVDP), and –dP/dt (maximum rate of decrease of LVDP) at baseline, 10, 20, and 30 min post-administration of TX-100, and 10, 30, 60, 90, and 120 min after reperfusion were determined.
3. Cell Culture
Endothelial cells (ECs) isolated from coronary arteries of healthy subjects (Cell Applications, San Diego, CA, USA) were cultured in MesoEndo cell growth medium (Cell Applications) at 37°C and used between 4th and 6th passages when approximately 70–80% confluent. CMs were isolated from hearts of one-day-old Wistar rats by repeating enzyme digestion (0.15 mg/ml collagenase II and 0.52 mg/ml pancreatin (Sigma-Aldrich), as previously described. [32] CMs were used 3–7 days after isolation when demonstrating rhythmic contractions.
4. EC-CM Co-culture
ECs and/or CMs were cultured in media containing 5.5 mM (normal glucose concentration, NG) or 20.0 mM glucose (high glucose concentration, HG) for 12 h. For co-culture, ECs were mixed and cultured with CMs at distinct ratios for 12 h, depending on the design of the experiment. [33] Culture medium was then replaced and the cells were exposed to 2 h of hypoxia (0.1% O2, Biospherix hypoxia chamber, Lacona, NY, USA) in glucose-free medium followed by 2 h of reoxygenation (Figure 1, protocol C). In some experiments, cells were treated with 1 mM L-NG-monomethyl arginine (L-NMMA, Cayman Chemical Company, Ann Arbor, MI, USA), a non-specific NOS inhibitor. To investigate the effect of BH4 in ECs, 100 µM sepiapterin (SEP, Sigma-Aldrich) was added to co-cultured cells as substrate for the synthesis of BH4 during 60 min of baseline and the period of hypoxia/reoxygenation (H/R). The release of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) into the culture medium as a marker of cell damage was quantified with a commercially available kit (Genzyme Diagnostics, Cambridge, MA, USA).
5. Overexpression of GTPCH-1 Gene in ECs
GTPCH-1 was amplified from pCMV-sport6 (cDNA, Open Biosystems, Waltham, MA, USA) using primers 5′- AGA CAC CGA CTC TAG - GTA TAC - GCC ACC - ATG GAG AAG CCG CGG-3′ and 5′- CCG CTT TAC TTG TAC - TCA AGC GTA ATC TGG AAC ATC GTA TGG GTA - GTA TAC - GCT CAG CTC CTG ATT AGT GTG-3′ (C- terminal HA tag) and 5′- AGA CAC CGA CTC TAG - GCC ACC - ATG GAG TAC CCA TAC GAT GTT CCA GAT TAC GCT - GTA TAC - ATG GAG AAG CCG CGG-3′ and 5′- CCG CTT TAC TTG TAC - GTA TAC - TCA GCT CAG CTC CTG ATT AGT-3′ (N-terminal HA tag) and cloned into pLenti-CMV-GFP-Puro (#17448, Addgene, Cambridge, MA, USA) between the XbaI and Bsp1407I sites, using In-Fusion HD cloning system (Clontech, Mountain View, CA, USA). [34].
Lentivirus vectors were produced in roller bottles by co-transfection of 293T cells with 79 µg pLenti-CMV-CHA/NHA-GTPCH1, 52 µg psPAX2 packaging (#12260, Addgene), and 26 µg pMD2.G (VSV-G envelope, #12259, Addgene) using Polyethylenimine (Polysciences Warrington, PA, USA). Transfection medium was replaced with sodium butyrate-containing medium at 12–16 h post transfection, and virus-containing supernatant was harvested 24–32 h later (36–48 h post transfection). Supernatant was cleared, filtered through 0.22 µm PES and concentrated by centrifugation at 5000×g for 20 h. The virus pellet was resuspended in PBS and nutated for ∼3 h at 4°C, aliquoted, and frozen at −80°C. The viral titer was determined by quantitative PCR analysis of viral LTR-positive 293T cells. Pilot experiments using a GFP expressing lentiviral vector were performed to determine the optimal multiplicity of infection (MOI), which was found to be 3 (95–100% GFP-positive EC). ECs were infected in a 12-well plate by incubating with viral particles for 24 h followed by a viral washout.
6. Ozone Chemiluminescence
Nitrite concentration (an index of NO) was measured in the cell culture medium using a Sievers NO gas analyzer (Model 280, GE Analytical Instruments, Boulder, CO, USA), as previously described. [33], [35] Briefly, cell culture media (1 ml) from ECs, CMs, and EC-CM co-culture were collected at two time points (60 min at baseline and 2 h after reoxygenation) and immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen. Nitrite concentration was calculated after subtraction of background levels and normalized to total cell protein from cell lysates prepared as described for Western blotting.
7. BH4 Assay
BH4 was quantified by high performance liquid chromatography with electrochemical detection (ESA Biosciences CoulArray® system Model 542, Chelmsford, MA, USA), as previously described. [21] In brief, endothelial cell pellets were immediately lysed in 300 µl of 50 mM phosphate buffer (pH 2.6) containing 0.2 mM diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid and 1 mM dithioerythritol (freshly added) by shearing cells with a 28-gauge tuberculin syringe. Samples were centrifuged (12000×g, 10 min, 4°C), and supernatants were filtered through a 10 kD molecular weight cutoff column (Millipore, Billerica, MA). One hundred eighty µl of the flow through was analyzed by using a Synergi Polar-RP column (Phenomex, Torrance, CA, USA) eluted with argon-saturated 50 mM phosphate buffer (pH 2.6). Multi-channel electrochemical detection was set between 0–600 mV. One channel was set at −250 mV to verify the reversibility of BH4 oxidative peak detection. Calibration curves were constructed by summation of peak areas collected at 0 and 150 mV for BH4. Intracellular BH4 concentrations were calculated using authentic BH4 as standard and normalized to cell protein concentrations.
8. Western Blot Analysis of eNOS
The expression of eNOS in cultured CMs and ECs at a ratio of 1∶3 was measured in three separate groups. Expression of eNOS homodimers and monomers was evaluated in Groups 1 and 2. In Group 1, the cells were divided into the following four subgroups (n = 4 cells dishes/group): NG, HG, HG+SEP, and HG+SEP+L-NMMA. The treatment of cells with HG, SEP, and L-NMMA was described in Section 2.4. In Group 2, cells were assigned to the following three subgroups (n = 4 cell dishes/group): NG, HG+ConVec (control vector), and HG+GTPCH-1 OE (GTPCH-1 overexpressing ECs). ECs in NG group were cultured for 12 h in normoglycemic medium prior to co-culture with CMs. ECs in HG+GTPCH-1OE group were infected with lentiviral vectors (as described in section 2.5) for 24 h, cultured for 24 h without lentiviral vectors in normoglycemic medium and for 12 h in hyperglycemic medium, and co-cultured with CMs. ECs in HG+ConVec were infected with the control vector (as described in section 2.5) for 24 h, cultured for 24 h without lentiviral vectors in normoglycemic medium and for 12 h in hyperglycemic medium, and co-cultured with CMs. All co-cultured cells underwent 2 h of hypoxia followed by 2 h of reoxygenation. To investigate eNOS homodimer formation in CM-EC co-culture, nonboiled cellular lysate was resolved by 6% SDS-PAGE at 4°C overnight, as previously described. [23] Membranes were incubated with a 1∶2000 dilution of mouse anti-eNOS monoclonal antibody (BD Transduction Laboratories, San Jose, CA, USA). The expression of total eNOS and phosphorylated eNOS (phos-eNOS) was examined in Group 3. The cells were assigned to the following five subgroups (n = 6 cell dishes/group): NG, HG, HG+SEP, HG+SEP+L-NMMA, and HG+GTPCH-1 OE. Total soluble protein from cell lysates was prepared as previously described. [21], [23] In brief, 50 µg of protein was resolved on a 7.5% SDS-polyacrylamide gel, proteins transferred to polyvinylidene fluoride membranes, and the membranes blocked in tris-buffered saline containing 5% milk. The membranes were incubated with primary antibodies against eNOS (Santa Cruz Biotechnologies, Santa Cruz, CA, USA) and phos-eNOS (Cell Signaling, Boston, MA, USA) overnight at 4°C, washed and then incubated with the appropriate secondary antibody. Immunoreactive bands were visualized by enhanced chemiluminescence followed by densitometric analysis using image acquisition and analysis software (Image J, NIH). β-actin (Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA) was used to normalize the expression of eNOS and phosphorylated eNOS (phos-eNOS).
9. Statistical Analysis
All data are expressed as mean ± S.E.M. Statistical analysis was performed with one-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni post-hoc test for multiple comparisons of multiple group means or with Student’s t test for comparisons between two groups. A value of P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results
1. Impact of Coronary Endothelium on Myocardial I/R Injury
There were no significant differences in baseline coronary flow of Langendorff-perfused hearts between groups. Ach and NP significantly increased coronary flow both before and after saline (control) injection (Figure 2). In contrast, after a bolus injection of 1∶200 TX-100 at 0.3% of coronary flow, Ach-induced increases in coronary flow were significantly diminished compared with the saline-treated group (n = 5 hearts/group, P < 0.05) (Figure 2A). However, there were no significant differences in NP-induced increases in coronary flow between TX-100 and saline-treated groups (Figure 2B).
The effects of TX-100 on cardiac function in Langendorff-perfused hearts are shown in Figure 3. Baseline values of +dP/dt and -dP/dt were comparable among groups. Bolus injection of TX-100 caused significant decreases in +dP/dt and -dP/dt 10 and 20 min after TX-100. Ventricular function (+dP/dt and -dP/dt) was partially recovered after I/R in vehicle-perfused hearts. Treatment of hearts with TX-100 resulted in more profound decreases in +dP/dt and -dP/dt during reperfusion as compared with vehicle-perfused hearts.
2. EC-derived Protection of CMs from H/R Injury is Dependent on NO and Sensitive to Glucose
H/R had no effect on LDH activity of ECs (data not shown). Co-culture of ECs and CMs at ratios of 1∶12 and 1∶6 did not significantly alter LDH activity following H/R injury compared with CMs alone (Figure 4A). Increasing the ratio of ECs to CMs to 1∶3 resulted in a significant decrease in LDH activity after H/R. NO production was significantly increased after H/R in co-cultured ECs and CMs compared with CMs alone (Figure 4B). The effects of ECs on CMs (LDH activity and NO production) were blocked by L-NMMA. Culture of ECs, but not CMs, in high glucose media also blocked EC-derived protection against H/R injury (Figure 5A) and NO production (Figure 5B).
3. SEP Restored EC-derived Protection of CMs during HG by eNOS Dimerization
SEP restored the productive effects of ECs on CMs during HG after H/R (Figure 6A), concomitantly with increased NO (Figure 6B) and BH4 concentrations (Figure 6C) compared with HG alone (n = 6, P < 0.05). As expected, L-NMMA blocked the beneficial effects of SEP on LDH activity and NO production, but not BH4 concentrations. HG significantly decreased the ratio of eNOS dimer/monomer (Figure 6D) compared with NG group (n = 6, P < 0.05), and this adverse action was abolished by SEP (n = 4, P < 0.05).
4. GTPCH-1 Overexpression in ECs Restored EC-derived Protection of CMs during HG by Preventing eNOS Uncoupling
EC infection with lentiviral control vector (ConVec) did not alter the expression of GTPCH-1 protein (data not shown). Treatment of ECs expressing ConVec with HG significantly increased LDH activity and decreased BH4 concentrations, NO production, and the ratio of eNOS dimer/monomer compared with ECs and CMs co-cultured in normoglycemic medium (Figure 7). Overexpression of GTPCH-1 in ECs reversed the deleterious effects of HG on cell injury, NO production, and BH4 concentrations after H/R. In addition, the ratio of eNOS dimer/monomer was restored by GTPCH-1 overexpression during HG.
5. SEP Supplementation and GTPCH-1 Overexpression Increased eNOS Phosphorylation
The ratio of phos-eNOS to total eNOS was significantly decreased by HG in EC-CM co-culture (Figure 8). However, this detrimental effect of HG was reduced by either SEP or GTPCH-1 overexpression in ECs. The beneficial actions of SEP on activation of eNOS were blocked by L-NMMA.
Discussion
The results of the present investigation demonstrate that ECs exert protective actions on CMs during H/R via eNOS-derived NO, and that HG abolishes the protective effect of ECs on CMs. Intriguingly, increased BH4 content in ECs by pharmacological and genetic approaches restores the protective effect of ECs on CMs during HG. Thus, BH4 is likely to play a key role in maintaining the physiological function of eNOS and eNOS-derived NO production during H/R.
The endothelium forms a metabolically active lining of blood vessels and plays a major role in regulating blood flow by altering underlying vascular smooth muscle tone. [36], [37] In the present study, a bolus injection of TX-100 in Langendorff-perfused mouse hearts abolished the vasodilatory response to the endothelium-dependent vasodilator Ach, but not to the endothelium-independent vasodilator NP. TX-100 treatment resulted in coronary endothelial dysfunction, but did not change vascular smooth muscle responsiveness to NP. TX-100-treated hearts also displayed more profound decreases in ventricular function after I/R compared with control hearts. In the EC-CM co-culture model, addition of ECs to CMs at a ratio of 1∶3 significantly decreased CM injury after H/R, and this action was blocked by HG. Taken together, the results suggest a critical role of the endothelium to modulate recovery from I/R injury.
We used the 1∶3 ratio of EC to CM in the EC-CM co-culture. In mammalian hearts, the ratios of EC to CM are 2–4∶1. [38] To enhance the ratio of EC to CM to 3∶1, we added more ECs to the co-culture system, which resulted in the death of more ECs (data not shown). It is likely that cultured ECs were heavier than those in native myocardium, therefore clumping together and lacking adhesion during the co-culture process. [39] Enhanced ratios of EC to CM by decreasing CMs caused significant amounts of cell death in the control group (CM alone). It is likely that limited cell-cell communication between CMs during the seeding process results in the death of more CMs.
In the healthy heart, CMs are intimately related to ECs in a web-like network of capillaries. [38] Communication between ECs and CMs is important in maintaining physiological regulation of CMs. [29], [38], [40] eNOS is constitutively expressed in ECs, [41] and eNOS-derived NO serves as a pivotal endothelium-derived modulator that maintains normal function of the vasculature. [42], [43] Short episodes of myocardial I/R (ischemic preconditioning) have previously been shown to increase the release of NO from the endothelium. [22], [23] To investigate whether EC-derived NO contributes to CM protection, co-culture experiments were performed in the presence of L-NMMA, a non-specific inhibitor of NOS. EC-derived cardioprotection of CMs against H/R injury was blocked by L-NMMA, and this occurred concomitantly with a decrease in EC-derived NO.
HG has previously been shown to have a major impact on mortality after myocardial infarction, [2] and HG is an independent predictor of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. [44] Endothelial dysfunction is regarded as one of the most significant contributors to the development of vascular lesions during diabetes mellitus. [3], [5] In the present study, exposure of ECs but not CMs to high glucose media abolished EC-derived CM protection against H/R injury in the co-culture model. This was accompanied by a reduced concentration of endothelial BH4 and NO bioavailability. The findings suggest that decreased NO bioavailability caused by HG contributes to endothelial dysfunction, [45], [46] and that this endothelial defect negatively impacts survival of CMs following H/R. Endothelial BH4 is important for eNOS activity. [47], [48] However, during HG, BH4 is oxidized to enzymatically incompetent dihydrobiopterin due to increased production of reactive oxygen species and peroxynitrite, ultimately leading to eNOS uncoupling and production of superoxide in lieu of NO. [24], [25] Thus, it is likely that biopterin metabolism plays a central role in HG-elicited eNOS dysfunction.
BH4 is synthesized through two distinct pathways: the de novo and salvage pathways. [49], [50] GTPCH-1 is the first and rate-limiting enzyme in the de novo pathway, catalyzing the BH4 formation from GTP via enzymatic reactions. In ECs, the expression and activity of GTPCH-1 determine BH4 levels. [51] Alternatively, the salvage pathway enzyme dihydrofolate reductase converts SEP to BH4. [52] In the present study, both pharmacological (SEP) and genetic (overexpression of GTPCH-1) strategies impacting both pathways were used to increase endothelial BH4 concentrations, NO production, and reduce H/R injury during HG. Thus, both GTPCH-1 and BH4 may serve as therapeutic targets for CM protection during H/R in the presence of HG.
Culturing ECs in hyperglycemic medium for 12 h decreased the ratio of eNOS dimer/monomer and caused endothelial dysfunction in the co-culture model. Previous evidence indicates that only the dimeric form of eNOS is enzymatically active and able to generate NO. [53] In contrast, the monomeric form of the enzyme is a marker for uncoupling of eNOS, during which transfer of electrons from the reductase to the oxygenase domains is not coupled to L-arginine oxidation. The latter contributes to superoxide formation with subsequent deleterious effects. It is likely that monomerization of eNOS elicited by HG contributes to endothelial dysfunction. Intriguingly, both administration of SEP and GTPCH-1 overexpression in ECs dramatically increased BH4 content and restored the ratio of eNOS dimer/monomer and phos-eNOS/total eNOS during HG. The results suggest that BH4 may enhance the stabilization and activity of eNOS in the presence of HG. [47], [48].
The present study indicates HG increases the vulnerability of CMs to H/R injury by a BH4/eNOS/NO pathway-dependent mechanism. This conclusion should be interpreted within the constraints of potential limitations. Neuregulin-1 is synthesized as a transmembrane protein in myocardial microvascular ECs and binds to ErbB receptors on CMs to regulate the function of CMs. [54], [55] Previous studies indicate that neuregulin-1 increases eNOS phosphorylation and NO production and protects CMs from apoptotic cell death produced by oxidative stress.[55]–[57] Recent evidence suggests that the neuregulin-1/ErbB signaling pathway is impaired in diabetic myocardium. [58] It remains unclear whether the neuregulin-1/ErbB signaling pathway is involved in the detrimental effect of HG on endothelial-myocardial interaction.
Exposure of ECs to HG attenuated the protective effect of ECs on CMs subjected to H/R injury in cultured cells. To examine the detrimental effect of HG on endothelial function in intact animals, C57BL/6 mice were injected intraperitoneally with 2 g/kg dextrose for 5 consecutive days to induce acute HG. Despite the high mortality in the dextrose-treated mice, coronary artery isolated from the surviving mice had significant relaxation responses to Ach (data not shown). These results suggest that coronary endothelial function is preserved in the dextrose-treated mice. It may be in part related to an increase in insulin, [59] that produces the vasodilatory effect by the stimulation of the release of NO. [60] To eliminate the confounding response of insulin, we injected streptozotocin 200 mg/kg into C57BL/6 mice to induce total insulin deficiency. Although blood glucose was higher than 350 mg/dl 2 weeks after streptozocin injection, isolated coronary artery displayed marked relaxation responses to Ach 4 weeks after the streptozotocin injection. Further experiments with prolonged period of HG will be performed to study the detrimental effect of HG on coronary endothelial function in vivo.
In summary, HG-induced decreases in coronary endothelial BH4 exacerbate the vulnerability of myocardium to I/R injury by reducing eNOS-derived NO. Enhanced BH4 content in ECs can increase CM tolerance to ischemic stress during HG. Thus, preservation of sufficient endothelial BH4 during I/R could be an effective strategy for cardioprotection during HG or diabetes.
Acknowledgments
We thank Mark R. Paterson, David Schwabe, Shelley L. Baumgardt, and John Tessmer (all from Department of Anesthesiology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA) for excellent technical assistance.
Disclosures
This manuscript was presented in part at the 2012 American Heart Association Scientific Sessions, Los Angeles, California, November 3–7, 2012 and published in abstract form (Circulation 2012;126:A16892).
Funding Statement
This work was supported, in part, by National Institutes of Health research grants HL 063705 (to Dr. Kersten) and GM 066730 (to Drs. Kersten and Warltier) from the United States Public Health Services, Bethesda, Maryland. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. No additional external funding received for this study.
References
- 1. Ishihara M, Kagawa E, Inoue I, Kawagoe T, Shimatani Y, et al. (2007) Impact of admission hyperglycemia and diabetes mellitus on short- and long-term mortality after acute myocardial infarction in the coronary intervention era. Am J Cardiol 99: 1674–1679. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Deedwania P, Kosiborod M, Barrett E, Ceriello A, Isley W, et al. (2008) Hyperglycemia and acute coronary syndrome: A scientific statement from the american heart association diabetes committee of the council on nutrition, physical activity, and metabolism. Circulation 117: 1610–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. The diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group (1993) The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long-term complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med 329: 977–986. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Makimattila S, Virkamaki A, Groop PH, Cockcroft J, Utriainen T, et al. (1996) Chronic hyperglycemia impairs endothelial function and insulin sensitivity via different mechanisms in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Circulation 94: 1276–1282. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) group (1998) Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33). Lancet 352: 837–853. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Nishikawa T, Edelstein D, Du XL, Yamagishi S, Matsumura T, et al. (2000) Normalizing mitochondrial superoxide production blocks three pathways of hyperglycaemic damage. Nature 404: 787–790. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Du XL, Edelstein D, Rossetti L, Fantus IG, Goldberg H, et al. (2000) Hyperglycemia-induced mitochondrial superoxide overproduction activates the hexosamine pathway and induces plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 expression by increasing Sp1 glycosylation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 97: 12222–12226. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Brownlee M (2001) Biochemistry and molecular cell biology of diabetic complications. Nature 414: 813–820. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Du XL, Edelstein D, Dimmeler S, Ju Q, Sui C, et al. (2001) Hyperglycemia inhibits endothelial nitric oxide synthase activity by posttranslational modification at the akt site. J Clin Invest 108: 1341–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. von Bibra H, St John Sutton M (2011) Impact of diabetes on postinfarction heart failure and left ventricular remodeling. Curr Heart Fail Rep 8: 242–251. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Chen C, Jiang J, Lu JM, Chai H, Wang X, et al. (2010) Resistin decreases expression of endothelial nitric oxide synthase through oxidative stress in human coronary artery endothelial cells. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 299: H193–H201. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. He GW, Fan L, Grove KL, Furnary A, Yang Q (2011) Expression and function of endothelial nitric oxide synthase messenger RNA and protein are higher in internal mammary than in radial arteries. Ann Thorac Surg 92: 845–850. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Alderton WK, Cooper CE, Knowles RG (2001) Nitric oxide synthases: Structure, function and inhibition. Biochem J 357: 593–615. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Janssens S, Pokreisz P, Schoonjans L, Pellens M, Vermeersch P, et al. (2004) Cardiomyocyte-specific overexpression of nitric oxide synthase 3 improves left ventricular performance and reduces compensatory hypertrophy after myocardial infarction. Circ Res 94: 1256–1262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Amour J, Brzezinska AK, Weihrauch D, Billstrom AR, Zielonka J, et al. (2009) Role of heat shock protein 90 and endothelial nitric oxide synthase during early anesthetic and ischemic preconditioning. Anesthesiology 110: 317–325. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Frantz S, Adamek A, Fraccarollo D, Tillmanns J, Widder JD, et al. (2009) The eNOS enhancer AVE 9488: A novel cardioprotectant against ischemia reperfusion injury. Basic Res Cardiol 104: 773–779. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Heusch G, Boengler K, Schulz R (2008) Cardioprotection: Nitric oxide, protein kinases, and mitochondria. Circulation 118: 1915–1919. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Schulz R, Kelm M, Heusch G (2004) Nitric oxide in myocardial ischemia/reperfusion injury. Cardiovasc Res 61: 402–413. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Szelid Z, Pokreisz P, Liu X, Vermeersch P, Marsboom G, et al. (2010) Cardioselective nitric oxide synthase 3 gene transfer protects against myocardial reperfusion injury. Basic Res Cardiol 105: 169–179. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Schulz E, Jansen T, Wenzel P, Daiber A, Munzel T (2008) Nitric oxide, tetrahydrobiopterin, oxidative stress, and endothelial dysfunction in hypertension. Antioxid Redox Signal 10: 1115–1126. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Amour J, Brzezinska AK, Jager Z, Sullivan C, Weihrauch D, et al. (2010) Hyperglycemia adversely modulates endothelial nitric oxide synthase during anesthetic preconditioning through tetrahydrobiopterin- and heat shock protein 90-mediated mechanisms. Anesthesiology 112: 576–585. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Ge ZD, Ionova IA, Vladic N, Pravdic D, Hirata N, et al. (2011) Cardiac-specific overexpression of GTP cyclohydrolase 1 restores ischaemic preconditioning during hyperglycaemia. Cardiovasc Res 91: 340–349. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Vladic N, Ge ZD, Leucker T, Brzezinska AK, Du JH, et al. (2011) Decreased tetrahydrobiopterin and disrupted association of Hsp90 with eNOS by hyperglycemia impair myocardial ischemic preconditioning. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 301: H2130–H2139. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Vásquez-Vivar J, Kalyanaraman B, Martasek P, Hogg N, Masters BS, et al. (1998) Superoxide generation by endothelial nitric oxide synthase: The influence of cofactors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 95: 9220–9225. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Vásquez-Vivar J, Martasek P, Whitsett J, Joseph J, Kalyanaraman B (2002) The ratio between tetrahydrobiopterin and oxidized tetrahydrobiopterin analogues controls superoxide release from endothelial nitric oxide synthase: An EPR spin trapping study. Biochem J 362: 733–739. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Ge ZD, Peart JN, Kreckler LM, Wan TC, Jacobson MA, et al. (2006) Cl-IB-MECA [2-chloro-N6-(3-iodobenzyl)adenosine-5′-N-methylcarboxamide] reduces ischemia/reperfusion injury in mice by activating the A3 adenosine receptor. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 319: 1200–1210. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Wan TC, Ge ZD, Tampo A, Mio Y, Bienengraeber MW, et al. (2008) The A3 adenosine receptor agonist CP-532,903 [N6-(2,5-dichlorobenzyl)-3′-aminoadenosine-5′-N-methylcarboxamide] protects against myocardial ischemia/reperfusion injury via the sarcolemmal ATP-sensitive potassium channel. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 324: 234–243. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Ge ZD, Pravdic D, Bienengraeber M, Pratt PF Jr, Auchampach JA, et al. (2010) Isoflurane postconditioning protects against reperfusion injury by preventing mitochondrial permeability transition by an endothelial nitric oxide synthase-dependent mechanism. Anesthesiology 112: 73–85. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Li K, Rouleau JL, Andries LJ, Brutsaert DL (1993) Effect of dysfunctional vascular endothelium on myocardial performance in isolated papillary muscles. Circ Res 72: 768–777. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Ramaciotti C, McClellan G, Sharkey A, Rose D, Weisberg A, et al. (1993) Cardiac endothelial cells modulate contractility of rat heart in response to oxygen tension and coronary flow. Circ Res 72: 1044–1064. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Kennedy RH, Owings R, Shekhawat N, Joseph J (2004) Acute negative inotropic effects of homocysteine are mediated via the endothelium. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 287: H812–H817. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Jamnicki-Abegg M, Weihrauch D, Pagel PS, Kersten JR, Bosnjak ZJ, et al. (2005) Isoflurane inhibits cardiac myocyte apoptosis during oxidative and inflammatory stress by activating Akt and enhancing Bcl-2 expression. Anesthesiology 103: 1006–1014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Leucker TM, Bienengraeber M, Muravyeva M, Baotic I, Weihrauch D, et al. (2011) Endothelial-cardiomyocyte crosstalk enhances pharmacological cardioprotection. J Mol Cell Cardiol 51: 803–811. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Campeau E, Ruhl VE, Rodier F, Smith CL, Rahmberg BL, et al. (2009) A versatile viral system for expression and depletion of proteins in mammalian cells. PLoS One 4: e6529. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Sessa WC, Garcia-Cardena G, Liu J, Keh A, Pollock JS, et al. (1995) The golgi association of endothelial nitric oxide synthase is necessary for the efficient synthesis of nitric oxide. J Biol Chem 270: 17641–17644. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Furchgott RF, Zawadzki JV (1980) The obligatory role of endothelial cells in the relaxation of arterial smooth muscle by acetylcholine. Nature 288: 373–376. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Vane JR, Anggard EE, Botting RM (1990) Regulatory functions of the vascular endothelium. N Engl J Med 323: 27–36. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Brutsaert DL (2003) Cardiac endothelial-myocardial signaling: its role in cardiac growth, contractile performance, and rhythmicity. Physiol Rev 83: 59–115. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Anversa P, Olivetti G, Melissari M, Loud AV (1980) Stereological measurement of cellular and subcellular hypertrophy and hyperplasia in the papillary muscle of adult rat. J Mol Cell Cardiol 12: 781–795. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Narmoneva DA, Vukmirovic R, Davis ME, Kamm RD, Lee RT (2004) Endothelial cells promote cardiac myocyte survival and spatial reorganization: Implications for cardiac regeneration. Circulation 110: 962–968. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Kuboki K, Jiang ZY, Takahara N, Ha SW, Igarashi M, et al. (2000) Regulation of endothelial constitutive nitric oxide synthase gene expression in endothelial cells and in vivo : A specific vascular action of insulin. Circulation 101: 676–681. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Vo PA, Lad B, Tomlinson JA, Francis S, Ahluwalia A (2005) Autoregulatory role of endothelium-derived nitric oxide (NO) on lipopolysaccharide-induced vascular inducible NO synthase expression and function. J Biol Chem 280: 7236–7243. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Cauwels A, Janssen B, Buys E, Sips P, Brouckaert P (2006) Anaphylactic shock depends on PI3K and eNOS-derived NO. J Clin Invest. 116: 2244–2251. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Kersten JR, Toller WG, Tessmer JP, Pagel PS, Warltier DC (2001) Hyperglycemia reduces coronary collateral blood flow through a nitric oxide-mediated mechanism. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 281: H2097–H104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Cai S, Khoo J, Channon KM (2005) Augmented BH4 by gene transfer restores nitric oxide synthase function in hyperglycemic human endothelial cells. Cardiovasc Res 65: 823–831. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Cai S, Khoo J, Mussa S, Alp NJ, Channon KM (2005) Endothelial nitric oxide synthase dysfunction in diabetic mice: Importance of tetrahydrobiopterin in eNOS dimerisation. Diabetologia 48: 1933–1940. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Bendall JK, Alp NJ, Warrick N, Cai S, Adlam D, et al. (2005) Stoichiometric relationships between endothelial tetrahydrobiopterin, endothelial NO synthase (eNOS) activity, and eNOS coupling in vivo: Insights from transgenic mice with endothelial-targeted GTP cyclohydrolase 1 and eNOS overexpression. Circ Res 97: 864–871. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Crabtree MJ, Tatham AL, Al-Wakeel Y, Warrick N, Hale AB, et al. (2009) Quantitative regulation of intracellular endothelial nitric-oxide synthase (eNOS) coupling by both tetrahydrobiopterin-eNOS stoichiometry and biopterin redox status: insights from cells with tet-regulated GTP cyclohydrolase I expression. J Biol Chem 284: 1136–1144. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Nichol CA, Lee CL, Edelstein MP, Chao JY, Duch DS (1983) Biosynthesis of tetrahydrobiopterin by de novo and salvage pathways in adrenal medulla extracts, mammalian cell cultures, and rat brain in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 80: 1546–1550. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Thony B, Auerbach G, Blau N (2000) Tetrahydrobiopterin biosynthesis, regeneration and functions. Biochem J 347 Pt 1: 1–16. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Channon KM (2004) Tetrahydrobiopterin: Regulator of endothelial nitric oxide synthase in vascular disease. Trends Cardiovasc Med 14: 323–327. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Crabtree MJ, Tatham AL, Hale AB, Alp NJ, Channon KM (2009) Critical role for tetrahydrobiopterin recycling by dihydrofolate reductase in regulation of endothelial nitric-oxide synthase coupling: Relative importance of the de novo biopterin synthesis versus salvage pathways. J Biol Chem 284: 28128–28136. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Bauersachs J, Schafer A (2005) Tetrahydrobiopterin and eNOS dimer/monomer ratio–a clue to eNOS uncoupling in diabetes? Cardiovasc Res 65: 768–769. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54. Cote GM, Miller TA, Lebrasseur NK, Kuramochi Y, Sawyer DB (2005) Neuregulin-1alpha and beta isoform expression in cardiac microvascular endothelial cells and function in cardiac myocytes in vitro. Exp Cell Res 311: 135–146. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55. Lemmens K, Segers VF, Demolder M, De Keulenaer GW (2006) Role of neuregulin-1/ErbB2 signaling in endothelium-cardiomyocyte cross-talk. J Biol Chem 281: 19469–19477. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56. Lemmens K, Fransen P, Sys SU, Brutsaert DL, De Keulenaer GW (2004) Neuregulin-1 induces a negative inotropic effect in cardiac muscle: role of nitric oxide synthase. Circulation 109: 324–326. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57. Kuramochi Y, Cote GM, Guo X, Lebrasseur NK, Cui L, et al. (2004) Cardiac endothelial cells regulate reactive oxygen species-induced cardiomyocyte apoptosis through neuregulin-1beta/erbB4 signaling. J Biol Chem 279: 51141–51147. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58. Gui C, Zhu L, Hu M, Lei L, Long Q (2012) Neuregulin-1/ErbB signaling is impaired in the rat model of diabetic cardiomyopathy. Cardiovasc Pathol 21: 414–420. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59. Williams SB, Goldfine AB, Timimi FK, Ting HH, Roddy MA, et al. (1998) Acute hyperglycemia attenuates endothelium-dependent vasodilation in humans in vivo. Circulation 97: 1695–1701. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60. Scherrer U, Randin D, Vollenweider P, Vollenweider L, Nicod P (1994) Nitric oxide release accounts for insulin's vascular effects in humans. J Clin Invest 94: 2511–2515. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]