Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Microbiology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Microbiology
. 2013 Aug;51(8):2781–2784. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00910-13

Cat Scratch Disease Caused by Bartonella grahamii in an Immunocompromised Patient

Jarmo Oksi a, Sari Rantala b, Sanna Kilpinen b, Raija Silvennoinen c, Martine Vornanen d, Ville Veikkolainen e, Erkki Eerola f, Arto Tapio Pulliainen e,
PMCID: PMC3719609  PMID: 23740723

Abstract

Bartonella grahamii colonizes rodents worldwide and has been detected in questing Ixodes ricinus ticks. Here, the first human B. grahamii infection confirmed by multilocus sequence typing is reported. The route of transmission and clinical picture of the patient are similar to those seen in patients with cat scratch disease, which is typically diagnosed as a Bartonella henselae infection.

CASE REPORT

A 57-year-old female patient was diagnosed in February 2008 with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) with deletion of the short arm of chromosome 17 (del 17p), indicating a poor prognosis without stem cell transplantation. She was treated with fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab from February through April 2008 with a complete response in the bone marrow but stable lymphadenopathy. Alemtuzumab was given as a second-line treatment from June through October 2008 with a variable minimal response in the lymph nodes. Allogeneic stem cell transplantation from a matched unrelated donor was performed after reduced intensive conditioning (RIC) in October 2008. RIC consisted of a combination of fludarabine, treosulfan, and antithymocyte globulin. The patient showed no symptoms of acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). Two months later, in December, she developed a high fever and cytomegalovirus (CMV) was detected in her blood at 2,000 copies/ml. She recovered with 4 weeks of valganciclovir treatment at 900 mg twice daily. Immunosuppressive therapy with cyclosporine was given at 125 plus 150 mg daily. She also received prophylactic valaciclovir at 500 mg twice daily, double-strength cotrimoxazole twice a day two times a week, and daily vitamin C and iron substitution therapy. Whole-body computed tomography showed axillary, cervical, and mediastinal lymph node masses, which were clearly diminished in size compared to the initial imaging before induction treatment. At the end of January 2009, her CD4 cell count was only 15 × 106/liter (4% lymphocytes), indicating a high risk of opportunistic infection. There were no signs of GVHD. During a checkup by a hematologist on 11 February 2009, the dose of cyclosporine was decreased to 150 mg daily and then to 125 mg daily after a couple of weeks. During the same visit, she again showed CMV viremia at 700 copies/ml. Valganciclovir was restarted at a dose of 900 mg twice daily. Bone marrow aspiration showed morphological remission with minimal residual disease of 0.06% by flow cytometry and 0.3% by PCR.

On 5 March 2009, the patient noticed a swollen firm lymph node in the left axilla. On admission (7 March), her temperature was 37.4°C. The patient reported a cat scratch on her left thumb a few weeks earlier. The scratch developed to a reddish papule 1 cm high and 2 cm wide at the base of her left thumb, giving an impression of an abscess with a blackish crust on it. A slight redness and inflammatory lymphadenitis in the arm and a firm painful lymph node 3 cm in diameter in the axilla were noticed. Clinically, cat scratch disease (CSD) was suspected. The abscess on her left thumb was opened and drained, and a biopsy specimen was obtained. Daily azithromycin (250 mg) was started, and the immunosuppressive treatment with cyclosporine was again slightly decreased to a daily dose of 100 mg. Computed tomography of the whole body showed axillary lymph nodes on both sides with maximal measurements of 4.2 by 2 cm on the left side and 3.6 by 2.6 by 4.9 cm on the right side. In addition, there was a hypodense, blurry-edged lesion located centrally in the right lobe of the liver. Blood tests showed a hemoglobin level of 109 g/liter, a thrombocyte count of 198 × 109/liter, and a leukocyte count of 9.2 × 109/liter with a normal differential count, liver function tests within normal limits, a C-reactive protein level of 27 mg/liter, and an erythrocyte sedimentation rate of 73 mm/h. Her serum was negative for antibodies against Toxoplasma gondii, Francisella tularensis, Bartonella henselae, and Bartonella quintana on 9 March but was not tested for these afterward. The Bartonella kit used was the Bartonella Indirect Immunofluorescence Assay IgG, IF1300G, Focus Diagnostics, Cypress, CA. The manufacturer recommends 1:64 as the starting dilution in serum screenings. Because of the heavy immunosuppressive treatment that had been given to her and also because of her CMV viremia, a 1:8 starting dilution was used. The test titer was <1:8. Blood cultures for bacteria and mycobacteria remained negative. Blood specimens for were negative CMV and Epstein-Barr virus by PCR assay. Microscopic examination of the biopsy specimen revealed hemorrhagic necrotic tissue around the ulceration of the surface of the skin consistent with a histological diagnosis of bacillary angiomatosis/pyogenic granuloma. Warthin-Starry silver staining demonstrated the presence of small coccobacilli in patchy infiltrates. The fluid aspirated from the abscess was cultured for bacteria, mycobacteria, and fungi and was negative for all of them. A DNA sample was prepared from the abscess fluid with the High Pure PCR template preparation kit (11796828001; Roche). A panbacterial PCR assay with oligonucleotides fD1mod and rP2 (1) (Table 1), targeting the 16S rRNA gene, and DyNAzyme II DNA polymerase (F-501L; Thermo Scientific) that was done according to the instructions of the manufacturer and the PCR program described in Table 2 was positive. The detection limit of the 16S rRNA PCR test is 2 CFU/μl. Sequence analysis indicated Bartonella infection, but identification to the species level was not possible. 16S rRNA gene sequences are highly conserved within the genus Bartonella and therefore not useful for robust species differentiation (2).

Table 1.

Oligonucleotide primers used for MLST

Oligonucleotide primer Target genetic marker, oligonucleotide orientation Sequence (5′→3′) Reference
fD1mod 16S rRNA gene, forward AGAGTTTGATCYTGGYTYAG This study
fD1 16S rRNA gene, forward AGAGTTTGATCCTGGCTCAG 1
rP2 16S rRNA gene, reverse ACGGCTACCTTGTTACGACTT 1
Bart/16-23F 16S-23S rRNA intergenic spacer region (ISR), forward TTGATAAGCGTGAGGTCGGAGG 5
Bart/16-23R 16S-23S rRNA intergenic spacer region (ISR), reverse CAAAGCAGGTGCTCTCCCAG 5
BhCS.781p GltA gene, forward GGGGACCAGCTCATGGTGG 4
BhCS.1137n GltA gene, reverse AATGCAAAAAGAACAGTAAACA 4
prAPT0244 RpoB gene, forward GATGTGCATCCTACGCATTATGG This study
prAPT0245 RpoB gene, reverse AATGGTGCCTCAGCACGTATAAG This study

Table 2.

PCR programs used for MLST in this study

Step Temp (°C), duration of step with oligonucleotide primers:
fD1mod + rP2 fD1 + rP2, Bart/16-23F + Bart/16-23R, BhCS.781p + BhCS.1137n, prAPT0244 + prAPT0245
1, Initial denaturation 94, 3 min 95, 1 min
2, Denaturation 94, 30 s 95, 30 s
3, Annealing 55, 30 s 55, 40 s
4, Extension 72, 1 min (37)a 72, 1 min (39)a
5, Final extension 72, 7 min 72, 10 min
6, Hold 4, indefinitely 4, indefinitely
a

The value in parentheses is the number of cycles of steps 2 to 4.

The patient was treated with azithromycin for 5 weeks. Thereafter, an ultrasound examination of the abdomen showed no more abnormal findings in the liver or any other organs. On 22 April, the patient's condition at a checkup was good and blood tests also showed very good results—a hemoglobin level of 108 g/liter, a leukocyte count of 4.8 × 109/liter, a neutrophil count of 1.5 × 109/liter, a thrombocyte count of 158 × 109/liter, a C-reactive protein level of <1 mg/liter, and creatinine, lactate dehydrogenase, and liver function test results within normal limits. The cyclosporine dose was no more than 25 mg daily and later, by the end of April, it was discontinued. In July 2009, a slight increase in the residual disease was detected immunophenotypically (2.2%) and 2 months later, in September, a relapse was shown on the basis of a significant increase in the number and size of the lymph nodes on whole-body computed tomography. A second allogeneic transplantation was an option. Reinduction with bendamustine and alemtuzumab was done between September 2009 and January 2010. Irradiation of the axillary and cervical lymph nodes in February and May 2010 and of the mediastinal lymph nodes in September and October 2010 was done. The response was transient, and ofatumumab was started in March 2011. The patient died in April 2011 from bronchiolitis caused by respiratory syncytial virus.

In December 2012, the abscess fluid DNA preparation was reanalyzed to refine the Bartonella diagnosis. This analysis is part of a nationwide study where clinical samples are retrospectively analyzed for the prevalence of Bartonella infections with PCR-based diagnostics. First, hypervariable regions V6 to V8 of the 16S rRNA gene were sequenced from a PCR-amplified fragment (with oligonucleotides fD1/rP2 and the PCR program in Tables 1 and 2, respectively). The 485-bp sequence obtained gave 100% identity scores with 16S rRNA sequences originating from three rodent-infecting species, B. tribocorum, B. grahamii, and B. queenslandensis. To complement the species-discriminatory power of 16S rRNA, PCR-amplified fragments of the RNA polymerase β-subunit gene (rpoB) (3), the citrate synthase gene (gltA) (4), and hypervariable region 2 of the 16S-23S rRNA intergenic spacer region (V2-ISR) (5) were sequenced (with the oligonucleotides and PCR programs in Tables 1 and 2, respectively). BLAST homology searches were performed in January 2013. The highest sequence identity score of the 406-bp rpoB fragment was 100% with rpoB fragments of several B. grahamii entries, including AF165993 of the V2 type strain. The next closest hit in a type strain was rpoB of the CIP 105476 strain of B. tribocorum (AM260525), which had a sequence identity score 94.3% (383/406). The highest sequence identity scores with the 338-bp gltA fragment were again with B. grahamii entries, 98.8% (334/338) with the V2 type strain gltA sequence (Z70016). Four B. grahamii entries were even closer to the patient strain gltA sequence, i.e., 99.1% identity (335/338) with AB426654 of a southern red-backed vole (Myodes gapperi) isolate from Canada, 99.4% identity (336/338) with AB426655 of a prairie vole (Microtus ochrogaster) isolate from the United States, 99.4% identity (336/338) with CP001562 of a wood mouse (Apodemus sylvaticus) isolate from Sweden, and 99.4% identity (336/338) with JQ694003 of a bank vole (Myodes glareolus)-infecting strain from France. The next closest hit in a type strain was gltA of the CIP 105476 strain of B. tribocorum (AM260525), which had a sequence identity score 95.3% (322/338). The highest sequence identity score with the 286-bp V2-ISR fragment was 99.3% (284/286) with the B. grahamii V2 type strain ISR (AJ269785). The next closest hit in a type strain was ISR of the AUST/NH12 strain of B. queenslandensis (EU111765), which had a sequence identity score of 51.7% (148/286). MLST demonstrated unequivocally that the patient was infected with B. grahamii.

Discussion.

B. grahamii was first isolated from the blood of a bank vole in the United Kingdom (6). Subsequent field studies have shown that this hemotrophic bacterium colonizes a multitude of rodent species worldwide in countries such as Sweden, Denmark, Poland, Spain, Slovenia, Russia, China, Thailand, Japan, Canada, and the United States (713). The rodent flea Ctenophthalmus nobilis is a robust vector for the transmission of B. grahamii to new rodent hosts (14). Arthropod-mediated transmission to humans also appears plausible, as B. grahamii was recently detected in questing Ixodes ricinus ticks in Germany (15). Given the environmental prevalence of B. grahamii, it is surprising that a confirmed human infection has remained elusive. Here, the first MLST-confirmed human B. grahamii infection is reported.

The first indication that B. grahamii may infect humans was obtained in 1999 from a case of neuroretinitis (16). 16S rRNA-specific PCR analysis of a DNA sample prepared from anterior chamber fluid yielded a sequence fragment similar to B. grahamii. However, this 16S rRNA fragment is 99% identical to most of the species in the genus Bartonella and 100% identical to rat-infecting B. tribocorum and B. queenslandensis. 16S rRNA gene sequences are highly conserved within the genus Bartonella, and with today's knowledge, MLST approaches are necessary to differentiate species (2). The second indication of a human B. grahamii infection was obtained from a case of bilateral retinal artery branch occlusions in an immunocompetent patient (17). His serum was IgM positive (titer of 1:50) for B. grahamii but negative for B. henselae and B. quintana, indicating that the patient had recently been exposed to a B. grahamii-like bacterium. The first MLST-confirmed patient case, reported here, demonstrates that B. grahamii may indeed cause human infections.

The clinical picture of the patient was similar to that of a patient with CSD, which is typically diagnosed as a B. henselae infection (18, 19). However, enlarged lymph nodes were revealed by computed tomography of the patient also without the Bartonella infection that is typical of CLL. Serial imaging helped to detect the infection and differentiate the situation from a CLL relapse. Imaging also showed a hypodense lesion in the liver of the patient and that the lesion disappeared after antibiotic therapy. The patient was severely immunosuppressed, which may have influenced the clinical picture and allowed a different Bartonella species to cause CSD symptoms. Given its environmental prevalence, B. grahamii could also cause other febrile diseases in humans. It is hard to believe that such infections are rare. It is more likely that infections do take place but remain largely asymptomatic unless the individual is immunosuppressed. Current clinical diagnostic procedures may also fail to detect the bacterium. Indeed, our patient was culture negative and seronegative. Culturing of Bartonella spp. is demanding, and it may take several weeks until visible colonies appear. Serology, in turn, is known to be uncertain to detect infection in severely immunocompromised patients. Clinicians should bear in mind that robust PCR-based MLST techniques for Bartonella spp. that allow determination to the species level are available (Tables 1 and 2) (2).

The transmission of rodent-infecting B. grahamii to our patient was traced to a cat scratch. It is thought that the cat had caught an infected rodent while roaming outdoors and carried B. grahamii-infected tissue or blood on its claws. B. grahamii is one of the most prevalent hemotrophic bacteria in wild rodents. Clinical and public awareness of this zoonotic threat should be increased.

Nucleotide sequence accession numbers.

The nucleotide sequences obtained in this study have been deposited in GenBank under accession no. KC633097 to KC633100.

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

This work was supported by grant 9222 from the Turku University Foundation.

Footnotes

Published ahead of print 5 June 2013

REFERENCES

  • 1. Weisburg WG, Barns SM, Pelletier DA, Lane DJ. 1991. 16S ribosomal DNA amplification for phylogenetic study. J. Bacteriol. 173:697–703 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Kosoy M, Hayman DT, Chan KS. 2012. Bartonella bacteria in nature: where does population variability end and a species start? Infect. Genet. Evol. 12:894–904 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Renesto P, Gouvernet J, Drancourt M, Roux V, Raoult D. 2001. Use of rpoB gene analysis for detection and identification of Bartonella species. J. Clin. Microbiol. 39:430–437 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Norman AF, Regnery R, Jameson P, Greene C, Krause DC. 1995. Differentiation of Bartonella-like isolates at the species level by PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism in the citrate synthase gene. J. Clin. Microbiol. 33:1797–1803 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. García-Esteban C, Gil H, Rodríguez-Vargas M, Gerrikagoitia X, Barandika J, Escudero R, Jado I, García-Amil C, Barral M, García-Pérez AL, Bhide M, Anda P. 2008. Molecular method for Bartonella species identification in clinical and environmental samples. J. Clin. Microbiol. 46:776–779 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Birtles RJ, Harrison TG, Saunders NA, Molyneux DH. 1995. Proposals to unify the genera Grahamella and Bartonella, with descriptions of Bartonella talpae comb. nov., Bartonella peromysci comb. nov., and three new species, Bartonella grahamii sp. nov., Bartonella taylorii sp. nov., and Bartonella doshiae sp. nov. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 45:1–8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Berglund EC, Ellegaard K, Granberg F, Xie Z, Maruyama S, Kosoy MY, Birtles RJ, Andersson SG. 2010. Rapid diversification by recombination in Bartonella grahamii from wild rodents in Asia contrasts with low levels of genomic divergence in northern Europe and America. Mol. Ecol. 19:2241–2255 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Hsieh JW, Tung KC, Chen WC, Lin JW, Chien LJ, Hsu YM, Wang HC, Chomel BB, Chang CC. 2010. Epidemiology of Bartonella infection in rodents and shrews in Taiwan. Zoonoses Public Health 57:439–446 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Engbaek K, Lawson PA. 2004. Identification of Bartonella species in rodents, shrews and cats in Denmark: detection of two B. henselae variants, one in cats and the other in the long-tailed field mouse. APMIS 112:336–341 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Castle KT, Kosoy M, Lerdthusnee K, Phelan L, Bai Y, Gage KL, Leepitakrat W, Monkanna T, Khlaimanee N, Chandranoi K, Jones JW, Coleman RE. 2004. Prevalence and diversity of Bartonella in rodents of northern Thailand: a comparison with Bartonella in rodents from southern China. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 70:429–433 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Gil H, García-Esteban C, Barandika JF, Peig J, Toledo A, Escudero R, Jado I, Rodríguez-Vargas M, García-Amil C, Lobo B, Roales P, Rodríguez-Moreno I, Olmeda AS, García-Pérez AL, Anda P. 2010. Variability of Bartonella genotypes among small mammals in Spain. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 76:8062–8070 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Knap N, Duh D, Birtles R, Trilar T, Petrovec M, Avsic-Zupanc T. 2007. Molecular detection of Bartonella species infecting rodents in Slovenia. FEMS Immunol. Med. Microbiol. 50:45–50 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Welc-Faleciak R, Paziewska A, Bajer A, Behnke JM, Siński E. 2008. Bartonella spp. infection in rodents from different habitats in the Mazury Lake district, northeast Poland. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 8:467–474 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Bown KJ, Bennet M, Begon M. 2004. Flea-borne Bartonella grahamii and Bartonella taylorii in bank voles. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 10:684–687 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Janecek E, Mietze A, Goethe R, Schnieder T, Strube C. 2012. Bartonella spp. infection rate and B. grahamii in ticks. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 18:1689–1690 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Kerkhoff FT, Bergmans AM, van Der Zee A, Rothova A. 1999. Demonstration of Bartonella grahamii DNA in ocular fluids of a patient with neuroretinitis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 37:4034–4038 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Serratrice J, Rolain JM, Granel B, Ene N, Conrath J, Avierinos JF, Disdier P, Raoult D, Weiller PJ. 2003. Bilateral retinal artery branch occlusions revealing Bartonella grahamii infection. Rev. Med. Interne 24:629–630 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Pulliainen AT, Dehio C. 2012. Persistence of Bartonella spp. stealth pathogens: from subclinical infections to vasoproliferative tumor formation. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 36:563–599 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Mosbacher ME, Klotz S, Klotz J, Pinnas JL. 2011. Bartonella henselae and the potential for arthropod vector-borne transmission. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 11:471–477 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES