Dear Sirs,
Research serves a vital purpose in furthering the knowledge base on which medicine is practised. Furthermore it may be defined as the method to which we inform our action. In order for us to practice evidence-based medicine, we must be informing our action, which is reliant on robust and rigorous research.
Tomorrow’s Doctors 2009 relates to three domains: the scholar, the scientist and the practitioner. All three domains are intrinsically linked and responsible for consistently increasing the knowledge base [1] and hence require consistent, thorough and accurate research [2, 3]. Thus it is only logical that the authors of Tomorrow’s Doctors, the General Medical Council, expect these graduates to have the skills to perform this task.
Anecdotal evidence, however, suggests research is often seen by medical students as something only students who intercalate or come from previous academic backgrounds can achieve. Research techniques and methodologies are practically absent from the busy curriculum facing medical undergraduates. Furthermore, anecdotal evidence and conference presentations suggest many students do not feel they have any research skills teaching throughout their undergraduate course. The absence of research skills in the general undergraduate curriculum therefore jeopardizes the furthering of each domain, but also the ability to practice current and relevant evidence-based medicine.
Some institutions have tried to address this issue, in part by attempting to inform medical students about the benefits of careers in clinical research and academic medicine. However, this is doomed to failure if the people they wish to fill these positions in the future are graduating from courses that have not given them any skills to firstly partake in research, but more importantly to have an insight into what a research career may be like, compared with a clinical career.
Whilst no one should be forced to carry out research, as this may encourage a propensity for ‘bad research’ to flood academia, the basic concepts required to construct a research paper, and understand when and where ethics is and is not required should be present on undergraduate curriculums. The authors would argue research skills are an imperative core inclusion to the undergraduate curriculum, in order to ensure research uptake at some level in the majority of Tomorrow’s Doctors further practice.
Biographies
Thomas I Lemon
is a senior medical student at Cardiff University with a keen interest in research in all areas of medicine, having been involved with a range of work from looking at Bedside Teaching Encounters with the Institute of Medical Education at Cardiff, through to looking at tumour growth factors. He is also active in psychiatry, with forthcoming papers on substance misuse, forensics and psychiatry of chronic disease.
Rhiannon Lampard
is an early years medical student at Cardiff University. She has a keen interest in many areas of research, particularly the psychology of trauma.
Benjamin A. Stone
is an early years medical student at Cardiff University. He has a keen interest in many areas of research, including medical education and surgery.
Contributor Information
Thomas I. Lemon, Phone: +447927288906, Email: lemonti@cf.ac.uk
Rhianon Lampard, Email: c1103938@cardiffuniversity.ac.uk.
Benjamin A. Stone, Email: c1104224@cardiffuniversity.ac.uk
References
- 1.Kalet AL, Juszczak L, Pastore D, et al. Medical training in school-based health centers: a collaboration among five medical schools. Acad Med. 2007;82(5):458–464. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31803ea911. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Stead WW, Roderer N, Zimmerman JL. Successful principles for collaboration: formation of the IAIMS consortium. Acad Med. 1991;66(4):196–201. doi: 10.1097/00001888-199104000-00006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Carr PL, Pololi L, Knight S, Conrad P. Collaboration in academic medicine: reflections on gender and advancement. Acad Med. 2009;84(10):1447–1453. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181b6ac27. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]