Skip to main content
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2013 Jul 26;3:2235. doi: 10.1038/srep02235

Emerging superconductivity hidden beneath charge-transfer insulators

Yoshiharu Krockenberger 1,a, Hiroshi Irie 1, Osamu Matsumoto 2, Keitaro Yamagami 1,3, Masaya Mitsuhashi 1,3, Akio Tsukada 1,4, Michio Naito 2, Hideki Yamamoto 1
PMCID: PMC3724181  PMID: 23887134

Abstract

In many of today's most interesting materials, strong interactions prevail upon the magnetic moments, the electrons, and the crystal lattice, forming strong links between these different aspects of the system. Particularly, in two-dimensional cuprates, where copper is either five- or six-fold coordinated, superconductivity is commonly induced by chemical doping which is deemed to be mandatory by destruction of long-range antiferromagnetic order of 3d9 Cu2+ moments. Here we show that superconductivity can be induced in Pr2CuO4, where copper is four-fold coordinated. We induced this novel quantum state of Pr2CuO4 by realizing pristine square-planar coordinated copper in the copper-oxygen planes, thus, resulting in critical superconducting temperatures even higher than by chemical doping. Our results demonstrate new degrees of freedom, i.e., coordination of copper, for the manipulation of magnetic and superconducting order parameters in quantum materials.


While the issue of the mechanism of high temperature superconductivity continues to be controversial, one can clearly state that there have been many experimental results demonstrating that the lattices make a strong impact on the behavior of electrons1. First principle methods predict that square planar coordinated cuprates, e.g., Pr2CuO4 are expected to be metals2,3,4, unlike octahedral-coordinated cuprates. Square planar coordinated cuprates are those which, upon electron doping, become eventually high temperature superconductors subject to an annealing treatment5. The purpose of the annealing process is not related to an improved crystal quality but an adjusted oxygen stoichiometry irrespective of the Ce concentration x. A rich interplay of magnetic and electronic phases are reported6,7,8,9 for electron doped cuprates in relation to the doping concentration x. In particular, the vicinity of the insulating antiferromagnetic ground state to the superconducting ground state has been investigated8,10,11,12 and it was found that both phases, superconducting and insulating, are in competition with each other. Moreover, the boundary between the superconducting and antiferromagnetic-insulating phases in the electronic phase diagram of electron doped cuprate superconductors is not associated to a definite value x, but rather varies. Li et al.13 and Charpentier et al.14 reported a critical doping concentration xc = 0.12, Krockenberger et al.15 reported xc = 0.10 and Brinkmann et al. reported a xc = 0.04 16 for superconducting Pr2-xCexCuO4. Furthermore, Matsumoto et al.17 reported superconductivity even for xc = 0.00 in Nd2-xCexCuO4. Although each group applies its unique annealing recipe, it is common to all five reports that the annealing conditions themselves have been kept almost constant over the entire doping range. The wide range of xc between 0.00 and 0.12 suggests that the annealing recipe affects the competition between the antiferromagnetic insulating and superconducting states, severely. Additionally, the wide range of xc may reflect that the appropriate annealing conditions for the induction of superconductivity themselves are doping dependent.

Electron-doped cuprate superconductors adopt the T′-structure (Nd2CuO4 structure) where two primary sites are occupied by oxygen: O(1) in the CuO2 planes and O(2) in the rare-earth (RE) oxide layers. Apical oxygen should not exist in the ideal T′ structure though they are clearly observed by Raman and far-infrared crystal-field spectroscopy18,19, Mössbauer spectroscopy20, extended X-ray absorption fine structure spectroscopy21,22 and neutron scattering23,24. An ideal annealing recipe would solely evacuate apical oxygen atoms while keeping regular oxygen sites at the O(1) and O(2) sites occupied.

Results

In this study, we used thin film Pr2CuO4 samples (1000 Å thick) synthesized by state-of-the-art molecular beam epitaxy (MBE). In contrast to bulk samples, the large surface-to-volume ratio of thin films along with their tenuity itself is advantageous in achieving homogenous oxygen configurations. Thin films of Pr2CuO4 have been grown intentionally at temperatures lower than optimal as a reduced crystallite dimensions are advantageous for a homogeneous annealing experience.

In general the annealing process in oxide materials is a diffusion process. In particular, regular O(1) and O(2), as well as apical O(3) sites are occupied or evacuated in the T′-cuprates. Here, we use a high precision partial oxygen pressure monitoring and control system (POPMCS) combined with X-ray diffraction and transport data of Pr2CuO4 for the analysis of the annealing process. A commercial quartz tube furnace equipped with a turbo molecular pump and POPMCS was used. The Pr2CuO4 film was mounted on the tip of a SSA-S alumina tube placed at the center of the quartz tube.

Starting from the standard annealing process (Fig. 1) typically applied to electron doped cuprates25,26, we split the annealing procedure, thus a two-step annealing process. Our systematic investigation on this new two-step annealing scheme reveals that only certain annealing conditions are suitable to preserve the T′-structure and induce superconductivity into Pr2CuO4. In Fig. 1b, we plot the electronic phase diagram of Pr2-xCexCuO4 (standard annealed), where the superconducting transition temperatures of 273 c-axis oriented, single phase thin films of Pr2-xCexCuO4 on (001) SrTiO3 (a = 3.905 Å) substrates are shown for 0.00 < x < 0.25. In contrast to the phase diagram for standard annealed Pr2-xCexCuO4, the ex-situ two-step annealing process allows superconductivity even without cerium. The phase diagram shown in Fig. 1c shows that superconductivity appears at all doping levels up to x ≈ 0.22 and the highest Tc is not at x = 0.15 but 0.00, in stark contrast to the commonly observed phase diagram (Fig. 1b). The newly obtained superconducting phase diagram indicates that the apparent symmetry of electronic phases for hole and electron doped cuprate superconductors with respect to the antiferromagnetic-insulating ground state might be an artifact of commonly used annealing treatments, thus, not representative. Instead, it appears that for zero doping, only the T-phase is an antiferromagnetic Mott insulator whereas the T′-phase is a superconductor, in agreement with the first principle methods' predictions2,3,4.

Figure 1. Annealing paths of Pr2CuO4 and the resulting electronic phase diagrams.

Figure 1

In (a), the thermodynamic phase diagram is plotted where logarithmic and reciprocal scaling is used for the oxygen pressure and the absolute temperature, respectively. Thermodynamic stability lines for the copper-oxygen system and Pr2CuO452 are shown. Pr2CuO4 films were grown using a radio-frequency activated oxygen plasma (O*) by molecular beam epitaxy. The oxygen pressure during the synthesis is 2 × 10−6 Torr, corresponding to an equilibrium molecular oxygen pressure of 106 Torr. The synthesis temperature of Pr2CuO4 is 650–750°C. Standard annealing is carried out at temperatures between 550 and 650°C under 10−9 Torr. In the two-step annealing process53, Pr2−xCexCuO4 is annealed ex situ first at 750–850°C and 7.6 × 10−2 Torr O2 and subsequently annealed at temperatures between 450 and 700°C under high vacuum. In (b), the doping dependence of the superconducting phase diagram of Pr2-xCexCuO4 is shown for 273 different samples obtained by the standard annealing process. For 0.00 < x < 0.10, Pr2-xCexCuO4 is an antiferromagnetic insulator (AFI). For 0.11 < x < 0.23, superconductivity is induced by the standard annealing process with a maximum Tc of 25 K at x = 0.14. In (c), the doping dependence of the superconducting phase diagram of Pr2-xCexCuO4 is shown. Data points (black triangle) have been taken from16. At x = 0.00, results of 84 samples are summarized (star). Dashed lines represent the phase diagram as obtained in Fig. 1(b).

Discussion

Comparing the influence of doping to the influence of annealing to Pr2CuO4 reveals that a hidden, hole-like Fermi surface may be present. The Ce doping dependence of the evolution of the Fermi surface of Nd2-xCexCuO4 has been reported by Armitage et al.27 for x = 0.04, x = 0.10 and x = 0.15. Traces (small but finite density of states) of a hole-like Fermi surface can be detected even for x = 0.04 27. However, such a sample is neither metallic nor superconducting owing to the annealing conditions applied. The hidden Fermi surface suggests that the applied annealing conditions were not optimal. Commonly, the observed Hall coefficient14 is negative for x = 0.04. The negative Hall coefficient can be attributed to “hot spots” located at (π, 0) and (0, π). The overall contribution to the Hall coefficient of those hot-spots is significant for Pr2-xCexCuO4 as the Hall coefficient is negative up to x ≈ 0.17 (Fig. 2b). The Hall coefficients RH taken on superconducting Pr2CuO4 show unambiguously that the origin of metallic conduction and superconductivity itself is not electron doping but points towards a redistribution of spectral weight from those anti-ferromagnetic “hot-spots” into the hole-like Fermi-surface25. Figure 2(c) shows the temperature dependence of RH for superconducting Pr2CuO4, and the Hall coefficient of standard annealed Pr2-xCexCuO4 is shown in Figs. 2a and b. For standard annealed Pr2-xCexCuO4, the highest Tc is at x = 0.15 and those samples have a negative RH, while RH is positive in superconducting Pr2CuO4. Moreover, the Hall coefficient remains positive even after cerium doping (Fig. 2d) when an elaborate annealing process has been applied16. In general, the Hall conductivity of a metal is expressed28,29,30 as a function of the Fermi topology (k)/dk and the anisotropic relaxation time τ(k) at Fermi surface. The different signs of RH observed for the superconducting Pr2CuO4 and the standard annealed superconducting Pr2-xCexCuO4 emphasize that superconductivity in Pr2CuO4 is induced via another route than doping. In other words, the role of the 2-step annealing is not that of doping electron carriers via possible formation of oxygen vacancies at the regular oxygen sites. Moreover, the positive Hall coefficient of superconducting Pr2CuO4 reflects the situation of a hole like Fermi surface which develops upon removal of apical oxygen, which is in contrast to the hole-doped analogues, where both, the oxygenated T-La2CuO4 + δ and optimally Sr-doped La1.85Sr0.15CuO4 have positive RH31,32: the additional oxygen acts as a dopant for holes and in a similar way as Sr doping. We like to highlight the fact that the temperature dependence of the Hall coefficient is not that of a simple metal but rather demonstrates the competition between a hole-like metal and an antiferromagnetic insulator. This asymmetric scenario1,33,34,35 between square- and octahedral coordinated cuprates also shows that their electronic correlations are entirely different3. The absence of a doping mechanism in our elaborate annealing process is independently supported by the fact that the in-plane lattice constants of as-grown and annealed Pr2CuO4 films are constant upon annealing as it is well known that electron-doping stretches and hole-doping shrinks the Cu-O bonds in the CuO2 planes due to accumulation or depletion of electrons to/from the Cu-O Inline graphic anti-bonding bands36. The presence of additional oxygen in as-grown Pr2CuO4 is well established23,24 as is its removal by annealing. We visualized our annealing scenario in Fig. 3a. The as-grown crystal contains more than the stoichiometric amount of oxygen which are randomly distributed at apical sites (Fig. 3a). After the first annealing step we find that the lattice parameters are nearly unchanged (Fig. 3f) when compared to the as-grown sample (Fig. 3e). However, its resistivity value is significantly higher (Fig. 3c). We explain such behavior by the introduction of oxygen vacancies in the CuO2 plane since such defects would disturb electronic conduction severely. The second annealing step does repair those in-plane defects by relocating apical oxygen atoms to the planes and consequently the resistivity is lowered significantly (Fig. 3d). This final step creates a situation similar to what has been observed after an annealing treatment37 for the cerium doped superconductors38. Overall we do observe that the c-axis lengths decreases upon annealing (Fig. 3 e–g) and that has been unambiguously proven to be associated to the removal of apical oxygen by neutron scattering23,24. A typical value of the oxygen off-stoichiometry estimated from neutron scattering experiments of as-grown Nd2CuO4 + δ single crystals is δ ≈ 0.05, which indicates that one Cu ion out of ten unit cells is pyramidal coordinated. Experimentally, this is a sufficient condition to stabilize a long-range antiferromagnetic order even at Ce doping levels of x = 0.1539. In Ref. 39 it was shown that even for x = 0.15 the as-grown cuprate is an antiferromagnetic insulator with a TN = 150 K. After annealing, however, the cuprate system goes into the superconducting state. The only chemical difference is that occupied apical oxygen sites have been evacuated during that annealing process. Those occupied apical oxygen sites break the symmetry for all nearest and next-nearest-neighbor Cu plaquettes. Such a locally broken symmetry localizes electrons primarily on one Cu site and induce a gap in the Fermi surface. Therefore, the doping process in electron doped cuprates might be considered as a band filling process, as its ground state is already a metal40.

Figure 2. For the standard annealing process (a) and (b), the highest Tc is observed for x = 0.15.

Figure 2

In (a) the Hall coefficient RH (black line) and the resistivity at μ0H = 14 T are plotted as a function of T for standard annealed Pr2-xCexCuO4 with x = 0.15 at μ0H = 14 T and in (b) RH is plotted as a function of T and x (data taken from13,54,55). Additionally, TN and Tc are plotted as a function of x (TN taken from37 and Tc from13). The “+” and “−” marks indicate the sign of the Hall coefficient RH and are separated by the dashed line. The cross-over from “+” to “−” is at x ≈ 0.165 and coincides with the quantum critical point56. In case of conventionally annealed Pr2-xCexCuO4 the Hall coefficient develops monotonically upon electron doping (Ce doping) up to x ≈ 0.165. For the 2-step annealing process (c) and (d), the highest Tc is observed at x = 0.00 (star). In (c) RH (black line) and the resistivity at μ0H = 14 T are plotted as a function of T for Pr2CuO4 treated by a 2-step annealing process at μ0H = 14 T and in (d) as a function of T and x (Tc data taken from16). The “+” and “−” marks indicate the sign of the Hall coefficient RH and are separated (RH = 0) by the dashed line. In case of 2-step annealed Pr2CuO4 the Hall coefficient is positive at 300 K, and at 150 K and 120 K, a sign change appears. Below 120 K, the Hall coefficient is positive down to 1.7 K. Upon electron doping (Ce doping) the low temperature Hall coefficient stays positive irrespective of the Ce concentration level. The contour-plots (b) and (d) were made from linear interpolation of RH(T) curves for x = 0.05, 0.075, 0.09, 0.10, 0.12, 0.14, 0.15, 0.17, 0.19 and x = 0.00, 0.06, 0.08, 0.10, 0.15, 0.17 in (b) and (d), respectively.

Figure 3. Schematic and simplified copper-oxygen configurations of the CuO2 planes in Pr2CuO4 (square planar coordinated cuprates) in accordance to the results deduced from neutron and X-ray scattering analysis and electronic transport data.

Figure 3

(a) In the as-grown state, random apical sites of copper are occupied (apical oxygen). During the first annealing step of our two-step annealing procedure, not apical but regular oxygen sites of the CuO2 planes are being evacuated. During the second annealing step, the defective CuO2 plane is being “healed” by an oxygen rearrangement from the apical sites to regular in-plane sites (shrinkage of c-axis). (b)–(d) Evolution of ρ(T) characteristics and lattice constants after each synthesis step. The as-grown T′-Pr2CuO4 thin film is insulating and the optimally reduced films (after step II) are superconducting while ρ(300 K) is reduced by more than 2 orders of magnitude. The T′-Pr2CuO4 thin films just after step I are even less conductive than the as-grown ones. (e)–(g) The in-plane lattice constant (a0) remains constant throughout the annealing process while that of c-axis (c0) shows an abrupt drop after step II. The lattice parameters a0 and c0 have been estimated from a Nelson-Riley function of the (h03h) and (002l) reflections, respectively.

It is worth mentioning that the entire annealing process is a diffusion process as long as thermodynamic limits are not violated. Certainly, those limits have been violated considering earlier reports41. In contrast to the standard annealing process applied for bulk specimens, thermodynamic constraints, e.g., the Pr2CuO4Inline graphic Pr2O3 + Cu2O stability line, may not be crossed in our 2-step annealing process. As for the standard annealing process, reduction conditions below the thermodynamic stability regions may harm the T′ phase, therefore RE2O3 oxides are often observed and consequently cause an increase of the absolute resistivity value. The annealing conditions applied in the first annealing step of our experiments are above the thermodynamic stability lines of Pr2CuO4 and CuO, thus, decomposition products, i.e., Pr2O3, can be ruled out in contrast to other experiments as we do not see indication of their presence either by transmission electron microscopy or X-ray diffraction. Besides the influence of the annealing conditions on the electronic transport properties (Fig. 4a,b), the crystallite dimensions of the thin film are also affected. Low annealing temperatures result in larger (Δqx)−1 values (Fig. 4c and 4d), though the superconducting transition temperatures are constant (Fig. 4a, 4b). Both of the annealing steps of our two-step annealing process are not independent and their correlation to superconductivity is visualized in Fig. 4e where the superconducting transition temperature (Tc) is plotted as a function of the first- (Ta) and second- (Tred) annealing temperatures. For optimal superconducting transition temperatures, a low Ta requires a low Tred and a high Ta requires a high Tred. Consequently, when the annealing time and the oxygen partial pressures are kept constant, optimal superconducting transition temperatures are associated to Ta and Tred in an arc shaped relation.

Figure 4. The temperature dependence of the resistivity (a,b), their associated high resolution reciprocal space maps (HRRSM) of fully relaxed Pr2CuO4 films grown on (001)SrTiO3 substrates (c,d), and the relationship between the first (Ta) and second (Tred) annealing temperature and their influence on the superconducting transition temperature Tc (e).

Figure 4

In (a,c), a Pr2CuO4 film was annealed at Ta = 750°C and 7.6 × 10−2 Torr oxygen for 1 h (first annealing step), followed by a reduction process at Tred = 450°C under high vacuum for 10 min. The electronic transport shows metallic behavior with a superconducting transition at 26.0 K and a residual-resistivity-ratio (RRR) = 7. The relative position of the (−109) diffraction spot of Pr2CuO4 to the (−103) SrTiO3 diffraction spot shows that Pr2CuO4 films are epitaxial but relaxed grown on (001) SrTiO3. The in-plane lattice constant of the Pr2CuO4 films is 3.96 Å. (Δqx)−1 ≈ 80 nm provides a rough estimation of the lateral crystallite dimensions. In (b, d), a Pr2CuO4 film was annealed at Ta = 850°C and 7.6 × 10−2 Torr oxygen for 1 h (first annealing step), followed by a reduction process at Tred = 650°C under high vacuum for 10 min. The electronic transport shows metallic behavior with a superconducting transition at 25.0 K and RRR > 5. The relative position of the (−109) diffraction spot of Pr2CuO4 to the (−103) SrTiO3 diffraction spot shows that Pr2CuO4 films are epitaxial but relaxed grown on (001) SrTiO3. The in-plane lattice constant of the Pr2CuO4 films is 3.96 Å. (Δqx)−1 ≈ 250 nm provides a rough estimation of the lateral crystallite dimensions. The influence of the annealing history on the superconducting transition temperature Tc is given in (e). Here, the oxygen partial pressures during the first and second annealing steps were kept constant and are 7.6 × 10−2 Torr and high vacuum, respectively. Tc levels as high as 26.0 K can be reached for Pr2CuO4 films grown on (001) SrTiO3 substrates.

Finally, we compare our data to results reported from first principle calculations mentioned earlier2,3,4. The contrasting ground states in square-planar and octahedral coordinated cuprates, i.e., T′ and T, are consequences of the difference in the charge-transfer gap Δ0, originating primarily from the different oxygen coordination. Vacant apical sites substantially reduce the electrostatic potential at the copper site, thus, the 3d9 Cu energy levels of the T′-phase are lower than in the T-phase, whereas the 2p6 O energy levels remain almost constant42,43. A simple evaluation of the unscreened Δ0 from Madelung potential calculations44,45 show that the difference in Δ0 between T′- and T-phases is in the range of several eV – therefore, the charge transfer gap might be very small or may even vanish in the T′-cuprates. Under such circumstances, the model of ionic binding, which is tacitly assumed in the discussion of the charge-transfer energy, loses its vindicability. Instead, hybridization effects between Cu 3dx2-y2 and O 2pxy orbitals may dominate electronic correlations, though they are not taken into account in the commonly used t-J model46. A superconducting ground state in square planar coordinated cuprates, where doping is not a prerequisite but an option, may promote a deep understanding of the rich variety of electronic phases of cuprates as they depend on coordination, doping and diluted impurities47. Moreover, the new phase diagram of square-planar coordinated cuprates implies the following question: Does Tc further increase upon hole-doping? A recent article by Takamatsu et al.48 indeed observed superconductivity in hole doped square-planar coordinated cuprates. Answering may provide a fundamental understanding of the mechanism of high temperature superconductivity. Certainly, the induction of a long range commensurate 3D antiferromagnetic order by a tiny amount of apical oxygen in T′-cuprates demand for a thorough analysis outside of the commonly successful theoretical treatments. As the competition of antiferromagnetic and superconducting order in T′-cuprates ultimately tunes the electronic properties, e.g., ρ(T), RH(T), a microscopic understanding would be beneficial. The possible solution for a quantitative analysis of site specific occupancies of oxygen in T′-cuprates is either via neutron scattering experiments (bulk samples) or 17O nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy49.

Methods

Thin films of c-axis oriented, single phase Pr2CuO4 were epitaxially grown on (001) SrTiO3 (a = 3.905 Å) substrates by molecular beam epitaxy (MBE). The growth of the T′-Pr2CuO4 films was performed in a custom-designed MBE chamber50,51 (base pressure ~ 10−9 Torr) from metal sources by using multiple e-gun evaporators and an atomic oxygen source (0.5 sccm, radio-frequency (RF) power of 250 W) as an oxidizing agent. The cation stoichiometry was adjusted by controlling the evaporation beam flux of each constituent element by electron impact emission spectrometry (EIES) (Guardian IV, Inficon, USA) via feedback loops to the e-guns. Ultra-fine tuning of the evaporation beam fluxes (± 0.005 Å/s) was done by reflection high-energy electron diffraction (RHEED) monitoring51. Typically, the substrate temperature for the growth of T′-Pr2CuO4 thin films was Ts = 600–650°C. The film thickness is 1000 Å. For comparison purpose, some of the films were reduced in-situ after the growth under the ultra-high vacuum (UHV) environment.

Using the MBE-grown films, we investigated the reduction condition dependence of the properties of T′-Pr2CuO4. A commercial quartz tube furnace of 60 cm length and 30 mm diameter was used. The furnace is equipped with a turbo molecular pump (TMP) and a commercial (SiOC-200, STLAB, Japan) high precision partial oxygen pressure monitoring and control system (POPMCS). The POPMCS allows a precise control of the oxygen partial pressure between 10−1 to 10−16 atm by mixing an inert gas, e.g., N2, and oxygen at an electrochemically controlled oxygen diffusor (yttrium stabilized zirconium oxide). The Pr2CuO4 film was mounted on the tip of a SSA-S alumina tube placed at the center of the quartz tube in longitudinal direction. Prior to its first usage the quartz tube was cleaned in boiling piranha clean whereas the alumina tube was rinsed by deionized water. The cleaned quartz tube and SSA-S alumina tube were prebaked at 1000°C for 10 h under ultra-high vacuum. Prior to the first annealing step, the partial pressure of oxygen was adjusted to a defined value. The N2/O2 gas mixture was kept at a constant flow rate of 500 sccm throughout all experiments. The second annealing step is performed in the same tubular furnace evacuated in 10−5 Torr residual gas pressure.

Author Contributions

All the MBE samples for ex-situ annealing experiments were prepared by H.Y. or Y.K. O.M., K.Y. and M.M. performed the ex-situ post-annealing experiments as well as most of the XRD, AFM, and ρ(T) measurements. In-situ annealing experiments were done by A.T. Y.K. carried out XRD experiments as well as characterization of magnetic properties by using a SQUID magnetometer. H.I. prepared the Hall bars and H.I. and Y.K. performed measurements of the Hall coefficient. M.N. along with other authors discussed the results and commented on the paper. All work was coordinated and overseen by H.Y. and M.N.

Supplementary Material

Supplementary Information

Supplementary information

srep02235-s1.doc (334KB, doc)

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to Dirk Manske, Paul Grant, George Sawatzki, Andrea Damascelli, and James Analytis. H. Y. thanks Hiroyuki Shibata, Yoshitaka Taniyasu and Tetsuya Akasaka for their support in experiments. H. Y. also acknowledges fruitful discussions on oxygen engineering in oxides with Masaru Tsuchiya. The work performed at Tokyo University of Agriculture and Technology was partially supported by KAKENHI B (Grant No. 18340098) from Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS).

References

  1. Dagotto E. Correlated electrons in high-temperature superconductors. Reviews of Modern Physics 66, 763–840 (1994). [Google Scholar]
  2. Weber C., Haule K. & Kotliar G. Apical oxygens and correlation strength in electron- and hole-doped copper oxides. Physical Review B 82, 125107 (2010). [Google Scholar]
  3. Weber C., Haule K. & Kotliar G. Strength of correlations in electron- and hole-doped cuprates. Nature Physics 6, 574–578 (2010). [Google Scholar]
  4. Das H. & Saha-Dasgupta T. Electronic structure of La2CuO4 in the T and T' crystal structures using dynamical mean field theory. Physical Review B 79, 134522 (2009). [Google Scholar]
  5. Tokura Y., Takagi H. & Uchida S. A superconducting copper oxide compound with electrons as the charge carriers. Nature 337, 345 (1989). [Google Scholar]
  6. Kang H. J. et al. Antiferromagnetic order as the competing ground state in electron-doped Nd1.85Ce0.15CuO4. Nature 423, 522–525 (2003). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Motoyama E. M. et al. Spin correlations in the electron-doped high-transition-temperature superconductor Nd2-xCexCuO4. Nature 445, 186–189 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Wilson S. D. et al. Resonance in the electron-doped high-transition-temperature superconductor Pr0.88LaCe0.12CuO4. Nature 442, 59–62 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Jin K., Butch N. P., Kirshenbaum K., Paglione J. & Greene R. L. Link between spin fluctuations and electron pairing in copper oxide superconductors. Nature 476, 73–75 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Mang P. K., Vajk O. P., Arvanitaki A., Lynn J. W. & Greven M. Spin correlations and magnetic order in non superconducting Nd2-xCexCuO4 ± δ. Physical Review Letters 93, 027002 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Lee P. A., Nagaosa N. & Wen X.-G. Doping a Mott insulator: Physics of high-temperature superconductivity. Reviews of Modern Physics 78, 17–85 (2006). [Google Scholar]
  12. Damascelli A., Hussain Z. & Shen Z.-X. Angle-resolved photoemission studies of the cuprate superconductors. Reviews of Modern Physics 75, 473–541 (2003). [Google Scholar]
  13. Li P., Balakirev F. F. & Greene R. L. High-Field Hall Resistivity and Magnetoresistance of Electron-Doped Pr2-xCexCuO4-δ. Physical Review Letters 99, 047003 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Charpentier S. et al. Antiferromagnetic fluctuations and the Hall effect of electron-doped cuprates: Possibility of a quantum phase transition at underdoping. Physical Review B 81, 104509 (2010). [Google Scholar]
  15. Krockenberger Y. et al. Superconductivity phase diagrams for the electron-doped cuprates R2−xCexCuO4 (R = La, Pr, Nd, Sm, and Eu). Physical Review B 77, 060505 (2008). [Google Scholar]
  16. Brinkmann M., Rex T., Bach H. & Westerholt K. Extended Superconducting Concentration Range Observed in Pr2-xCexCuO4-δ. Physical Review Letters 74, 4927–4930 (1995). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Matsumoto O. et al. Generic phase diagram of “electron-doped” T′ cuprates. Physica C: Superconductivity 469, 924–927 (2009). [Google Scholar]
  18. Riou G. et al. Pr3+ crystal-field excitation study of apical oxygen and reduction processes in Pr2-xCexCuO4 ± δ. Physical Review B 69, 024511 (2004). [Google Scholar]
  19. Richard P. et al. Role of oxygen nonstoichiometry and the reduction process on the local structure of Nd2−xCexCuO4 ± δ. Physical Review B 70, 064513 (2004). [Google Scholar]
  20. Nath A. et al. Chemical Signature of the Superconducting Phase in the Nd-Ce-Cu-O System. Science 265, 73–74 (1994). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Ghigna P. et al. Local structure around Ce in the Nd2-xCexCuO4 superconductor probed by EXAFS. Eur. Phys. J. B 41, 31–42 (2004). [Google Scholar]
  22. Tanaka Y. et al. Quantitative XANES Spectroscopy Study on the Prototype Hole- and Electron-Doped High-Tc Superconductor Systems, (La,Sr)2CuO4 and (Nd,Ce)2CuO4. Chemistry of Materials 20, 5414–5420 (2008). [Google Scholar]
  23. Schultz A. J., Jorgensen J. D., Peng J. L. & Greene R. L. Single-crystal neutron-diffraction structures of reduced and oxygenated Nd2-xCexCuOy. Physical Review B 53, 5157–5159 (1996). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Radaelli P. G., Jorgensen J. D., Schultz A. J., Peng J. L. & Greene R. L. Evidence of apical oxygen in Nd2CuOy determined by single-crystal neutron diffraction. Physical Review B 49, 15322–15326 (1994). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Armitage N. P., Fournier P. & Greene R. L. Progress and perspectives on electron-doped cuprates. Reviews of Modern Physics 82, 2421–2487 (2010). [Google Scholar]
  26. Krockenberger Y., Yamamoto H., Tsukada A., Mitsuhashi M. & Naito M. Unconventional transport and superconducting properties in electron-doped cuprates. Physical Review B 85, 184502 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  27. Armitage N. P. et al. Doping Dependence of an n-Type Cuprate Superconductor Investigated by Angle-Resolved Photoemission Spectroscopy. Physical Review Letters 88, 257001 (2002). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Hurd C. M. The Hall effect in metals and alloys (Plenum Press, 1972). [Google Scholar]
  29. Ong N. P. Geometric interpretation of the weak-field Hall conductivity in two-dimensional metals with arbitrary Fermi surface. Physical Review B 43, 193–201 (1991). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Nair S. et al. Hall effect in heavy fermion metals. Advances in Physics 61, 583–664 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  31. Hirayama T., Nakagawa M. & Oda Y. Hall effect in electrochemically oxidized La2CuO4 + δ and (La1−xSrx)2CuO4 + δ. Physica C: Superconductivity 334, 289–294 (2000). [Google Scholar]
  32. Poccia N. et al. Optimum inhomogeneity of local lattice distortions in La2CuO4 + y. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 109, 15685–15690 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Imada M., Fujimori A. & Tokura Y. Metal-insulator transitions. Reviews of Modern Physics 70, 1039–1263 (1998). [Google Scholar]
  34. Pickett W. E. Electronic structure of the high-temperature oxide superconductors. Reviews of Modern Physics 61, 433–512 (1989). [Google Scholar]
  35. Kastner M. A., Birgeneau R. J., Shirane G. & Endoh Y. Magnetic, transport, and optical properties of monolayer copper oxides. Reviews of Modern Physics 70, 897–928 (1998). [Google Scholar]
  36. Wang E., Tarascon J. M., Greene L. H., Hull G. W. & McKinnon W. R. Cationic substitution and role of oxygen in the n-type superconducting T′ system Nd2-yCeyCuOz. Physical Review B 41, 6582–6590 (1990). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Thurston T. R. et al. Antiferromagnetic spin correlations in (Nd,Pr)2-xCexCuO4-δ. Physical Review Letters 65, 263–266 (1990). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. King D. M. et al. Fermi surface and electronic structure of Nd2−xCexCuO4−δ. Physical Review Letters 70, 3159–3162 (1993). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Matsuda M. et al. Magnetic order, spin correlations, and superconductivity in single-crystal Nd1.85Ce0.15CuO4 + δ. Physical Review B 45, 12548–12555 (1992). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Sebastian S. E. et al. Metal-insulator quantum critical point beneath the high Tc superconducting dome. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 107, 6175–6179 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Kang H. J. et al. Microscopic annealing process and its impact on superconductivity in T'-structure electron-doped copper oxides. Nat Mater 6, 224–229 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Koitzsch A. et al. Core-hole screening response in two-dimensional cuprates: A high-resolution x-ray photoemission study. Physical Review B 66, 024519 (2002). [Google Scholar]
  43. Patabendige C. N. K., Azad A. K., Connor P. A., Rolle A. & Irvine J. T. S. Remarkable transition from rocksalt/perovskite layered structure to fluorite/rocksalt layered structure in rapidly cooled Ln2CuO4. Sci. Rep. 3 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Zhou J. S., Chan J. & Goodenough J. B. Copper-oxygen bond length and self-doping in R2CuO4 (R = Pr, Nd, Sm, Eu, Gd). Physical Review B 47, 5477–5480 (1993). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Tsukada A., Shibata H., Noda M., Yamamoto H. & Naito M. Charge transfer gap for T′-RE2CuO4 and T-La2CuO4 as estimated from Madelung potential calculations. Physica C: Superconductivity 445–448, 94–96 (2006). [Google Scholar]
  46. Feiner L. F., Jefferson J. H. & Raimondi R. Effective single-band models for the high-Tc cuprates. I. Coulomb interactions. Physical Review B 53, 8751–8773 (1996). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Wang Y. & Ong N. P. Particle-hole symmetry in the antiferromagnetic state of the cuprates. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 98, 11091–11096 (2001). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Tomohisa Takamatsu,. Masatsune Kato,. Takashi Noji. & Koike Y. Undoped and Hole-Doped Superconductors T'-La1.8-xEu0.2SrxCuO4 (x = 0 and 0.05) Prepared by Solid-State Reaction. Applied Physics Express 5, 073101 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  49. Rigamonti A., Borsa F. & Carretta P. Basic aspects and main results of NMR-NQR spectroscopies in high-temperature superconductors. Reports on Progress in Physics 61, 1367 (1998). [Google Scholar]
  50. Naito M. & Sato H. Stoichiometry control of atomic beam fluxes by precipitated impurity phase detection in growth of (Pr,Ce)2CuO4 and (La,Sr)2CuO4 films. Applied Physics Letters 67, 2557–2559 (1995). [Google Scholar]
  51. Naito M., Sato H. & Yamamoto H. MBE growth of (La,Sr)2CuO4 and (Nd,Ce)2CuO4 thin films. Physica C: Superconductivity 293, 36–43 (1997). [Google Scholar]
  52. Petrov A. N., Zuev A. Y. & Cherepanov V. A. Thermodynamic stability of the lanthanide cuprates Ln2CuO4 and LnCuO2, where Ln = La, Pr, Nd, Sm, Eu, or Gd. Russ. J. Phys. Chem. 62, 1613–1615 (1988). [Google Scholar]
  53. Yamamoto H., Matsumoto O., Krockenberger Y., Yamagami K. & Naito M. Molecular beam epitaxy of superconducting Pr2CuO4 films. Solid State Communications 151, 771–774 (2011). [Google Scholar]
  54. Dagan Y., Qazilbash M. M., Hill C. P., Kulkarni V. N. & Greene R. L. Evidence for a Quantum Phase Transition in Pr2-xCexCuO4-δ from Transport Measurements. Physical Review Letters 92, 167001 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Gauthier J. et al. Different roles of cerium substitution and oxygen reduction in transport in Pr2−xCexCuO4 thin films. Physical Review B 75, 024424 (2007). [Google Scholar]
  56. Butch N. P., Jin K., Kirshenbaum K., Greene R. L. & Paglione J. Quantum critical scaling at the edge of Fermi liquid stability in a cuprate superconductor. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 109, 8440–8444 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Information

Supplementary information

srep02235-s1.doc (334KB, doc)

Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES