Abstract
This review compares the regulations, definitions and approval processes for substances intentionally added to or unintentionally present in human food in the following specific countries/jurisdictions: Argentina, Australia, Brazil, Canada, China, the European Union, Japan, Mexico, New Zealand, and the United States. This includes direct food additives, food ingredients, flavouring agents, food enzymes and/or processing aids, food contact materials, novel foods, and nanoscale materials for food applications. The regulatory authority of each target jurisdiction/country uses its own regulatory framework and although the definitions, regulations and approval processes may vary among all target countries, in general there are many similarities. In all cases, the main purpose of each authority is to establish a regulatory framework and maintain/enforce regulations to ensure that food consumed and sold within its respective countries is safe. There is a move towards harmonisation of food regulations, as illustrated by Australia and New Zealand and by Mercosur. The European Union has also established regulations, which are applicable for all member states, to establish a common authorisation procedure for direct food additives, flavourings and enzymes. Although the path for approval of different categories of food additives varies from jurisdiction to jurisdiction, there are many commonalities in terms of the data requirements and considerations for assessment of the safety of use of food additives, including the use of positive lists of approved substances, pre-market approval, and a separation between science and policy decisions. The principles applied are largely reflective of the early work by the Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives (JECFA) committees and JECFA assessments of the safety of food additives for human and animal foods.
Keywords: food additives, novel food, food contact substances, flavouring agents, enzymes, processing aids, nanoscale materials, regulatory framework
Introduction
The purpose of this review is to present an overview and comparison of the regulation of substances added to foods in a number of different countries/jurisdictions, as well as the efforts of internationally recognised scientific and advisory bodies, such as the Codex Alimentarius Commission (CAC) and the Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives (JECFA) with respect to the safety assessment of these substances.
The specific countries/jurisdictions addressed are Argentina, Australia, Brazil, Canada, China, the European Union (EU), Japan, Mexico, New Zealand, and the United States (herein referred to as the “target countries”). The choice of jurisdictions to be included was based on a number of factors, and was intended to include both of well-established and emerging regulatory systems. The substances added to human food that are included in this review are direct food additives, common food ingredients such as sugar, food contact materials, flavouring agents, food enzymes, and/or processing aids. In addition, information pertaining to the development of regulations for nanomaterials falls under the scope of this review. Pesticide residues, drug residues or contaminants (e.g. lead) are not addressed in detail. A full list of included substances and their definitions according to each target country is provided. It should be noted that regulatory information for each country may be updated frequently and this report was written as an overview of the regulatory framework for each country. To the best of our knowledge, regulatory information is current as of June 2012. It is recognised that the definitions of terms used in this document may vary by organisation.
International scientific and advisory committees
The Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) and the World Health Organization (WHO) established the CAC jointly in 1962 to address safety and nutritional quality of foods, and develop international standards to promote trade (Codex Alimentarius Commission 2006). The CAC is an intergovernmental body composed of delegations from FAO and WHO member states that participate in developing food standards. The CAC develops standards on the basis of sound scientific evidence provided by independent FAO/WHO scientific committees. JECFA, established prior to the CAC in 1956, is the oldest and most active of these. Primary roles of the CAC include establishing international food standards for approved food additives providing maximum levels in foods, maximum limits for contaminants and toxins, maximum residue limits for pesticides and for veterinary drugs used in veterinary animals, and establishing hygiene and technological function practice codes (Codex Alimentarius Commission 2006). The collection of these standards, codes of practice, guidelines and recommendations, constitute what is known as the Codex Alimentarius, a substantial and useful reference. While the standards set by the CAC serve as guidelines to nations, the CAC has no regulatory authority and their standards are not enforceable unless they have been adopted into the regulatory framework for a nation or otherwise indicated (Codex 2011). For example, the World Trade Organization (WTO) refers to the Codex Alimentarius Sanitary and Phytosanitary practice codes in the SPS Agreement for member country food safety purposes.
Expert scientific advice is provided to the CAC by JECFA. Independent scientific committee members are appointed as experts in their own right and not as representatives of their governments or employers. Initially developed by WHO and FAO to address the safety of food additives, JECFA also has extended its activities to evaluate the safety of contaminants and veterinary drug residues in food. Although the outcome of JECFA's evaluations does not have any direct bearing on the regulatory approval of use of a food additive in any specific country, its evaluations are widely recognised and may affect an application for approval for a new food additive in a particular country.
The Joint FAO/WHO Committee on Food Additives (JECFA)
The initial steps of the Committee were to establish general principles regarding the technical purpose of food additives as well as principles for safe use for these substances. Regarding the matter of technical purpose the Committee noted that food additives could serve a valuable technical function in food: (1) to maintain the nutritional quality of food; (2) to enhance keeping quality or stability, with resulting reductions in food wastage; (3) to make food attractive to consumers; and (4) to provide essential aids to processing.
The Committee established the following situations in which food additives should not be used: (1) to deceive the consumer; (2) to result in substantial reduction of the nutritional value of food; (3) when the desired effect can be obtained by good manufacturing practices; or (4) to disguise the use of faulty processing or handling techniques.
With respect to safety evaluation of food additives the Committee again established sound key general principles. They were: (1) it is impossible to establish absolute proof of non-toxicity for all members of the human population; (2) critically designed animal studies can provide a reasonable basis for evaluating the safety of food additives; (3) the decision as to a safe level for a food additive should be based on knowledge of the minimum dietary level that produces no unfavourable response in test animals; (4) decisions on the use of food additives must be based on the considered judgment of properly qualified scientists that the intake of the additive will be below any level which could be harmful to consumers; (5) the fate of the additive during food processing and preparation should be considered because of the possible formation of toxic substances and interaction of the food additive with components of food or other food additives; and (6) consideration should be given to groups within the population who for medical reasons may be especially vulnerable to certain food additives. The Committee went on to recommend that when a food additive is proposed for use, considerations should be given:
to determine if there is a demonstrated benefitto consumers;
to limit the use of food additives in the diets of infants and young children;
to assess whether there are adequate data to derive specifications for identify and purity of the food additive; and
to limit the level of use of food additives to the minimum required to achieve the desired technical effect.
The Committee also noted that permitted lists of food additives should be drawn up because the use of prohibited lists could entail several years of exposure to potentially harmful food additives before sufficient evidence was accumulated to place it on the prohibited list. The use of permitted lists would eliminate this danger. The Committee also agreed with the principle that consumers should be made aware of the presence of food additives in their food and noted that label declaration is the most effective method of achieving this result. With respect to regulatory control at the national level, the Committee noted that methods must be available to measure food additives in foods and that enforcement of levels of use through appropriate food legislation provided a reliable way of governing the use of food additives.
JECFA also established principles and procedures for the testing of food additives to establish the safety of food additive use (JECFA 1958). The Committee noted that food additives may be consumed over a substantial proportion of lifetime and emphasised the need for studies in appropriate animal species that would reflect the conditions of human exposure. The Committee further noted that no single pattern of tests could adequately cover the testing requirements of substances of such diverse structure and function as food additives and therefore the Committee strongly emphasised that the establishment of a uniform set of experimental procedures that would be standardised and obligatory was undesirable. For this reason, which still holds true today, the Committee decided that it was only possible to formulate general recommendations on testing procedures.
The general principles regarding the testing of food additives were identified including: (1) the selection of animal species for testing indicating that background information on species/strain, natural disease rates, tumour incidence, and duration of life was essential for proper interpretation of experimental results; (2) the importance of animal housing, diets, control groups and statistical procedures for the design of studies, and their interpretation; (3) the importance of dose selection emphasising the need to magnify the dose in experimental animals to overcome statistical limitations of the test design and to provide a means of studying dose-response relationships; (4) the need for biochemical mechanistic investigations to detect subtle physiological changes and to assist in data interpretation; and (5) the need to examine the potential for food additives to induce carcinogenesis, stating that no proven carcinogen should be considered suitable for use as a food additive in any amount (JECFA 1958). The results of the toxicological evaluations are the basis for the allocation of an acceptable daily intake (ADI) or tolerable intake for contaminants the Committee considered unavoidable.
The Committee also discussed the pivotal issue relating to the extrapolation of animal studies to humans noting that in most instances a dosage level can be identified that causes no demonstrable effect in animals. It also noted that a margin of safety of 100 could be applied in extrapolating animal data to humans to account for species differences in susceptibility, numerical differences in population ranges between the test animals and the human population, the greater variety of complicating disease processes in the human population, and the possibility of synergistic action among food additives. The Committee noted that application of a 100-fold margin of safety would limit the use of some food additives yet was an adequate margin of safety for most substances proposed for use as food additives at the time.
Additionally, the Committee established specifications for the identity and purity of food additives. From the viewpoint of industry the specifications of the substance/compound helped define suitability for use in food. Items included in the specifications document were: title or name in common usage; synonyms; chemical name (IUPAC); empirical (organic compounds) or chemical formula (inorganic compounds); structural formula; molecular weight; definition (percentage of the stated substance that should be present origin of the material if necessary); description (appearance, taste, odour and other general properties); identification tests; and purity tests (tests for impurities and their nature).
In the early 1990s the CAC recognised the need to formalise the risk analysis process. A definition of risk analysis was developed, through a series of consultations, that embodies risk assessment, risk management and risk communication (CAC 2005). Scientific committees such as JECFA are responsible for risk assessment, which includes hazard identification, hazard characterisation, exposure assessment and risk characterisation. In response to formalisation of the risk assessment process, JECFA has increased its emphasis on exposure assessment, which includes predicted intake for substances new to the market or for which few relevant data exist and estimated intake of food additives and contaminants for which sufficient information exists for such an analysis. Within each jurisdiction, responsibility for each of the three components of risk analysis is often divided among different divisions of the regulatory agencies or to separate bodies. For example, in the EU, the Directorate General for Health and Consumers has risk management responsibility whereas the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) is an independent body with risk assessment and risk communication responsibilities. Further discussion of the process of risk analysis of components in foods, including risk management and risk communication, is outside the scope of this review.
When one looks back at this early work of the Committee, it is clear that JECFA has played a leading role in setting the worldwide agenda for how food additives, contaminants and adventitious substances in food should be evaluated. Although these deliberations occurred 50 years ago, the general principles and procedures elaborated by JECFA in early meetings have stood the test of time and are still used by the Committee at the present time. The credit for this lies with the early Committee members most of whom were outstanding research scientists and widely recognised experts in their discipline. The early work of JECFA also brought harmonisation of the approach to safety assessment of food additives on a worldwide basis. This resulted in a tremendous advantage to national governments that looked to JECFA for guidance and continue to do so. There can be no doubt that JECFA is the preeminent body dealing with food safety issues internationally.
The International Programme on Chemical Safety (IPCS)
The International Programme on Chemical Safety (IPCS) is a joint venture of the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), the International Labour Organisation (ILO), and the WHO. The main objective of the IPCS is to carry out and disseminate evaluations of the effects of chemicals on human health and the quality of the environment. In 1987, in response to numerous recommendations by JECFA, the IPCS convened a Task Force to review current knowledge and advances in toxicological science, and to develop criteria for testing and evaluation of the safety of food additives and contaminants. Thus, in 1987, the Environmental Health Criteria 70 (EHC70) was published, entitled Principles for the Safety Assessment of Food Additives and Contaminants in Food. This document was subsequently updated by the IPCS in 2009, with the publication of EHC240, entitled Principles and Methods for the Risk Assessment of Chemicals in Food (WHO 2009).
These guidelines provide a comprehensive current review of the key issues considered by JECFA during their risk assessments of food chemicals. Topics addressed include the risk assessment paradigm, chemical characterisation and specifications for food chemicals, toxicological studies used for hazard identification and characterisation, dose-response assessments, derivation of health-based guidance values such as ADI, assessment of dietary exposure to chemicals in food, risk characterisation, determination of maximum residue limits for pesticides and veterinary drugs, and approaches for assessment of specific groups of substances such as flavours and novel foods.
Regulations in different jurisdictions
To obtain an understanding of the global regulation of substances intentionally added to food, the regulatory systems and laws pertaining to their safety were reviewed and tabulated for ease of presentation and comparison. The countries that were chosen included: Argentina, Australia, Brazil, Canada, China, the EU, Japan, Mexico, New Zealand, and United States. These countries include both those with well-established regulatory systems (i.e. Australia, Canada, Japan, New Zealand, and the EU and US) and several that are currently in the process of changing and/or modernising their food regulatory systems (i.e. Argentina, Brazil, China and Mexico). Although it is acknowledged that there are many other jurisdictions that were worthy of inclusion in this review, limited resources required selection of those for which we had expertise in, and English versions or translations of regulations.
For each target country, the following information was sought and is summarised in table format (Tables 1–9):
Table 1.
Regulatory authority |
Name: Ministry of Health (Ministerio de Salud) and The National Administration of Drugs, Foods, and Medical Technology (Administración Nacional de Medicamentos, Alimentos y Tecnología Médica – ANMAT) Website:
Historical overview: ANMAT was created by Presidential Decree 1490/92 (ANMAT 1992) (http://www.anmat.gov.ar/webanmat/Legislacion/NormasGenerales/Decreto_1490-1992.pdf) Role/responsibility: ANMAT is a decentralised body of the National Public Administration, established by Decree 1490/92. It assists in the protection of human health, ensuring the quality of products within its jurisdiction: drugs, food, medical products, diagnostic reagents, cosmetics, dietary supplements and household products. Its jurisdiction covers the entire country. It was created in August 1992. Since then, a body of professionals and technicians work with modern technology effectively to implement the processes of authorisation, registration, regulation, monitoring and control products used in medicine, human food and cosmetics. It depends both technically and scientifically on the norms and directives given to it by the Secretary for Policies, Regulations and Institutions of the Ministry of Health, with a system of economic and financial autarchy. In this context, ANMAT's main objective is “to ensure that medicines, food and medical devices available to the population, have proven effectiveness (achieving the therapeutic, diagnostic or nutrition targets) safety (high ratio benefit/risk) and quality (responding to the needs and expectations of citizenship) …”a |
Advisory scientific body |
Name: National Committee of Food (CONAL) Website: http://www.conal.gov.ar (CONAL 2011) Historical overview: Created by Presidential Decree 815/99 (http://www.conal.gov.ar/Documentos/Decreto_815/815-99.htm) (CONAL 1999) Role/responsibility: CONAL functions as an advisory body that provides support and monitoring to the National Food Inspection System (Sistema Nacional de Control de Alimentos – SNCA), which enforces the Argentine Food Code (also known as Codigo Alimentario Argentino – CAA) (http://gain.fas.usda.gov/Recent%20GAIN%20Publications/Food%20and%20Agricultural%20Import%20Regulations%20and%20Standards%20-%20Narrative_Buenos%20Aires_Argentina_12-22-2011.pdf) (USDA 2010a). CONAL reviews all the petitions for incorporation to the CAA of new ingredients, food additives and processing aids, as well as materials in contact with foods, etc. When pertinent because of harmonisation requirements with Mercosur, CONAL requests treatment of the matter at the Mercosur level. |
Framework regulations | The CAA regulates local food production; however, as harmonised Mercosur regulations become available, the CAA incorporates those regulations into the CAA through Resoluciones Conjuntas issued by the Ministry of Health and the Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock and Fisheries (http://www.anmat.gov.ar/alimentos/normativas_alimentos_caa.asp). The CAA is a set of sanitary provisions, analytical standards and rules for commercial identification of products. It has more than 1400 articles divided into 20 chapters that include general provisions related to food factories and food trade, conservation and food processing, use of utensils, containers, packaging, standards for labelling and advertising of food, technical specifications of the different types of foods and beverages, processing aids, and food additives. Historical overview: The Argentine Food Code was put into force by Law 18,284, regulated by Decree 2126/71, of which Annex I is the text of CAA. It is a regularly updated technical regulation that establishes sanitary standards, analytical standards, and authenticity and quality standards to be complied by companies and individuals, production facilities, and food products that fall into their orbit. This legislation is primarily aimed at protecting the health of the population, and reliance in commercial transactions. |
Part of an overarching international organisation | Argentina has been a member of the World Trade Organization since 1995. It is a member of the Codex Alimentarius Commission as well as a member of Mercosur. |
Recent and/or pending changes | None known |
Regulatory overview of specific food chemical groups | |
Food ingredients |
Definition: As per GRUPO MERCADO COMUN (GMC) 26/03, food ingredients are defined as all substances, including the food additives, which are used in the manufacture or preparation of foods and which are present in the final product in its original or modifiedform. Novel foods: CAA does not define novel foods. Mercosur does not have a definition of novel foods either; however, novel foods are recognised in practice. Regulation: Currently, there are no novel food regulations in the CAA Guidance document: GMC 26/03 Approval process for a new substances (http://www.conal.gov.ar). New food ingredients, novel foods and food additives as well as any request for modification of the CAA should be done according to this guidance. However, if the product requested is considered a novel food in Europe, its inclusion will be delayed until the novel foods chapter of the CAA is written, approved and incorporated into the CAA. |
Direct food additives |
Definition: Food additives are defined according to GMC 26/03 as any ingredient that is added to foods intentionally, without intent to nurture, in order to modify the physical, chemical, biological or sensory characteristics of foods during its manufacture, processing, preparation, processing, packaging, conditioning, storage, transport or during food handling; it will have, or it can be reasonably expected to have (directly or indirectly) as a result, that the additive itself or its by-products become part of that food. This term does not include contaminants, or nutrients that are incorporated into a food in order to maintain or improve its nutritional properties. GMC 26/03 is currently under revision by the Sub Work Group #3 (SGT#3) Mercosur and a new Definition 2 continues to be discussed and should be gazetted during 2012. Regulation:
(http://gain.fas.usda.gov/Recent%20GAIN%20Publications/Food%20and%20Agricultural%20Import%20Regulations%20and%20Standards%20-%20Narrative_Buenos%20AiresArgentina_12-22-2011.pdf) Guidance document: No authoritative guidance document found Approval process for a new substances: All food additives that are not listed in the GMC11/06 can be submitted for evaluation to CONAL who will then submit a request to the Mercosur Sub Work Group #3 to consider the revision of 11/06 and to proceed to its incorporation. Revision of GMC 11/06 is expected in 2013. Submissions dossier should be addressed to CONAL following the general guidelines set forth at: http://www.conal.gov.ar |
Food contact substances (e.g. components of packaging materials) |
Definition: According to GMC, food contact substances are defined as any primary container or primary wrapping or container (one that is in direct contact with food). Regulation: GMC 32/07. There is a positive list of substances (in Appendix 1 of regulation GMC 32/07) that are added to plastics to achieve a technical effect in the final product (additives) such as antioxidants, antistatic, foaming, defoaming, fillers, impact modifiers, plasticisers, lubricants, stabilisers, UV protectants, preservatives, hardeners, etc. Included within this list are the substances used to provide a suitable medium polymerisation (e.g. emulsifiers, surfactants, buffers pH, solvents). Guidance document: No authoritative guidance document found Approval process for a new substances: Same as direct food additives |
Flavouring agents |
Definition: Flavouring agents are substances or mixtures of substances with odoriferous and/or flavour properties that are able to confer or enhance the aroma and/or taste of food. For the purpose of this Technical Regulation, flavourings/flavourings are classified as either natural or synthetic Regulation: Under Mercosur, GMC 10/06. A specified list of flavouring agents (natural or synthetic), including colourants is permitted. Exclusions from the technical regulations include:
Guidance document: No authoritative guidance document found Approval process for a new substances: Submission to CONAL and subsequent submission to Mercosur. General guidelines (http://www.conal.gov.ar) |
Enzymes |
Definition: Enzymes or enzyme preparations are defined as substances of animal, plant or microbial origin that act by promoting the desirable chemical reactions Regulation: CAA, Chapter XVI, Articles 1261, 1262 and 1263. Enzymes regulations are not harmonised in Mercosur Guidance document: No authoritative guidance document found Approval process for a new substances: General guidelines (http://www.conal.gov.ar) |
Processing aids |
Definition: A processing aid is any substance, excluding equipment and utensils, that is not consumed by itself as a food ingredient and which is intentionally used in the processing of raw materials, foods or ingredients, for a technological purpose during treatment or processing. It must be removed from the food or inactivated; the presence of traces of the substances or their derivatives may be admitted in the final product. Regulation:
Guidance document: No authoritative guidance document found Approval process for a new substances: General guidelines (http://www.conal.gov.ar) |
Nanoscale materials |
Definition: No authoritative statement found Regulation: No authoritative statement found Guidance document: No authoritative guidance information found Approval process for a new substances: No authoritative statement found Efforts towards developing standards and regulations (Locascio et al. 2011):
|
Table 9.
Regulatory authority |
Name: US Food and Drug Administration (USFDA) Website: http://www.fda.gov/Food/FoodIngredientsPackaging/default.htm Historical overview:
Role/responsibility:
|
Advisory Scientific body |
Name: USFDA Science Board and USFDA Food Advisory Committee Website:
Historical overview: Both the Science Board and the Food Advisory Committee were authorised by the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92–463) passed in 1972. The Science Board was established on 26 June 1992. The Food Advisory Committee was established on 15 December 1991 (21 CFR §14.100) Role/responsibility:
|
Framework regulations | Food and Drug Regulations: 21 CFR, Chapter 1 (http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfcfr/cfrsearch.cfm) |
Part of an overarching international organisation |
|
Recent and/or pending changes | The Food Safety Modernization Act was signed into law on 4 January 2011. Changes include requiring food facilities to document in writing that all substances at the facility that are intended to be added to food are allowed by the food additive regulatory programme (http://www.fda.gov/food/foodsafety/fsma/default.htm) |
Regulatory overview of specific food chemical groups | |
The US does not define the term “food ingredient”. Instead, it defines food. Food means, “(1) articles used for food or drink for man or other animals, (2) chewing gum, and (3) articles used for components of any such article” (21 USC §321(f)). Food includes human food, pet food, animal feed and substances migrating to food from food contact articles (21 CFR §170.3(m)). Any substance that is reasonably expected to become a component of food is a food additive that is subject to premarket approval by the USFDA, unless the substance is generally recognised as safe (GRAS) among experts qualified by scientific training and experience to evaluate its safety under the conditions of its intended use, or meets one of the other exclusions from the food additive definition in section 201(s) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA). Novel foods: The US does not define novel foods. New substances are regulated through a variety of mechanisms described below Regulation: 21 CFR, Chapter 1 (http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfCFR/CFRSearch.cfm) Guidance document: USFDA guidance regarding substances allowed in food, including new substances is available at: http://www.fda.gov/Food/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/GuidanceDocuments/FoodIngredientsandPackaging/default.htm Approval process for a new substances: There are three ways a food manufacturer can get clearance to add a new substance to its products:
A substance added directly to food can fall into one of several categories: food additive, prior sanctioned substance, colour additive, or the use of the substance is considered GRAS, depending on its intended use and the mechanism through which approval is sought. Definition:
Regulation:
Guidance documents: http://www.fda.gov/Food/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/GuidanceDocuments/FoodIngredientsandPackaging/default.htm#food Approval process for new substances: Same as described for food ingredients above. In this case, the petitions submitted would be food or colour additive petitions. Regarding voluntary notifications, the notification submitted by a manufacturer would be known as a GRAS notification and if the agency's review of this notification raises no concerns, the USFDA would send a letter stating that it has “no questions” regarding the manufacturer's decision |
|
Food contact substances (e.g. components of packaging materials) | In the US, substances added to food indirectly may be known as indirect additives, food contact substances (FCS), FCS below the threshold of regulation, or GRAS substances depending on their use and the method of clearance for use in food. Since 2000, FCSs are the most applicable category. Food contact substances are chemicals not intended to be added directly to or have a technical effect on the food, but which may reasonably expected to become a component of food. These include substances used in packaging, transporting or the production of food Regulation:
Guidance document: http://www.fda.gov/Food/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/GuidanceDocuments/FoodIngredientsandPackaging/default.htm Approval process for a new substances: Same as described for food ingredients above. The petition would be known as a food additive petition. Regarding notifications, although a manufacturer could submit a GRAS notification, most manufacturers of FCS choose to submit FCS Notifications because the approval by the USFDA is applicable only to that manufacturer. If a FCS Notification is submitted, the USFDA must object within 120 days |
Flavouring agents | Flavouring agents are regulated as both food additives and GRAS substances (see “Direct food additives” above for a description of both). Most flavouring agents in the US have been found to be GRAS by the Flavor and Extract Manufacturers Association (FEMA) expert panel, which makes safety decisions, publishes them, and submits them to the USFDA for review. http://www.femaflavour.org/gras. USFDA has also approved a number of flavours as food additives and GRAS substances Regulation: No specific regulations on flavouring agents. They are regulated as direct food additives or GRAS substances:
Guidance document: http://www.fda.gov/Food/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/GuidanceDocuments/FoodIngredientsandPackaging/default.htm Approval process for a new substances: Same as described for direct food additives above. Manufacturers can also seek a determination by FEMA |
Enzymes |
Definition: There is no specific regulation governing enzymes. They would be regulated as direct or secondary direct additives, or GRAS substances depending on their intended use and the method used to allow the substances in food Regulation: See “Direct food additives” (above) Guidance document: See “Direct food additives” (above) Approval process for new substances: See “Direct food additives” (above) |
Processing aids |
Definition: A subcategory of direct food additives, are what are known as “secondary direct additives”. These are food additives that have a technical effect in food during processing but that are not intended to have an ongoing technical effect in the food. These are sometimes more commonly known as processing aids. Direct food additives are described above. The USFDA may also consider processing aids to be food contact substances in some cases. Food contact substances are described above Regulation: See “Direct food additives” and “Food contact substances” (above) Guidance document: See “Direct food additives” and “Food contact substances” (above) Approval process for a new substances: See “Direct food additives” and “Food contact substances” (above) |
Nanoscale materials |
Definition: There is no formal definition for “nanotechnology” or “nanoscale” at this time. However the USFDA has indicated that “In the absence of a formal definition, when considering whether a USFDA-regulated product contains nanomaterials or otherwise involves the application of nanotechnology, the USFDA will ask: (1) whether an engineered material or end product has at least one dimension in the nanoscale range (approximately 1 100 nm); or (2) whether an engineered material or end product exhibits properties or phenomena, including physical or chemical properties or biological effects, that are attributable to its dimension(s), even if these dimensions fall outside the nanoscale range, up to one micrometer”. This definition is contained in the USFDA's Draft Guidance for Industry: Assessing the Effects of Significant Manufacturing Process Changes, Including Emerging Technologies, on the Safety and Regulatory Status of Food Ingredients and Food contact substances, Including Food Ingredients that are Colour Additives, which was issued in April 2012 (FDA 2012). Regulation: There are currently no formal regulations specifically governing nanotechnology or nanoscale materials as applied to food Guidance document: The USFDA has issued draft guidance, most recently in April 2012: Approval process for a new substances: New substances, whether direct food additives or food contact substances, cannot be GRAS per the USFDA's recently issued draft guidance. Manufacturers seeking approval for a nano-engineered substance must submit a food additive petition or a food contact substance notification. These are described above Efforts towards developing standards and regulations: The USFDA Nanotechnology Task Force, formed in August 2006 to:
|
A brief historical overview of the main regulatory body/scientific advisory body and highlight roles and responsibilities concerning the regulation of chemicals added to food.
A discussion of the regulatory framework.
Pertinent regulations.
Submission requirements/process for the approval of new food substances.
Any pending or recent changes and the reason for the changes.
Table 2.
Regulatory authority |
Name: Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) Website: http://www.foodstandards.gov.au (FSANZ 2011c) Historical overview:
Role/responsibility:
|
Advisory scientific body |
Role/responsibility: See above |
Framework regulations | Australia New Zealand Standards Code (the Code): The Code regulates all aspects of food including labelling, the addition of food additives, processing aids, nutritive substances, levels of contaminants, approval of new foods (novel foods, genetically modified (GM) foods and irradiated foods), composition of standardised and special purpose foods, and applying in Australia only, food safety programmes and food processing and primary production (http://www.foodstandards.gov.au) (FSANZ 2011a) |
Part of an overarching international organisation | Australia and New Zealand are both members of the World Trade Organization since 1995, and they are both members of the Codex Alimentarius Commission |
Recent and/or pending changes | No major changes to the regulatory framework anticipated. Refer to the new Science Strategy above |
Regulatory overview of specific food chemical groups | |
Food ingredients | Food ingredients as such are not defined under the Australia New Zealand food regulations. Ingredients are generally considered to be either foods or substances added to food. FSANZ is reviewing the regulation of novel foods and nutritive substances as of March 2012. Due to problems with the definition of these terms a new approach is being considered based on criteria for “eligible foods” (i.e. foods in the wider sense including ingredients, additives and other substances added to food). Any non-eligible foods would be prohibited and will require appropriate safety assessment. Novel foods (including novel food ingredients):
Regulation:
Guidance document: Application Handbook (http://www.foodstandards.gov.au):
Approval process for a new substances: An application to vary the code is required to approve the use of a novel food ingredient or a novel food. All application forms must conform to the general requirements (under Section 3.1 of the Application Handbook). Section 3.5.2 Novel Foods (within the handbook) lists additional requirements specificto novel foods. A summary of the requirements are listed below:
|
Nutritive substances |
Definition: Nutritive substance means a substance not normally consumed as a food in itself and not normally used as an ingredient of food, but which, after extraction and/or refinement or synthesis, is intentionally added to a food to achieve a nutritional purpose, and includes vitamins, minerals, amino acids, electrolytes and nucleotides Regulation: Nutritive substances cannot be added to certain special purpose foods without express permission. These are:
Guidance document: Application Handbook:
Approval process for a new substances: An application to vary the code is required to approve the use of a nutritive substance or to change the permissions of a currently used nutritive substance. All application forms must conform to the general requirements (under Section 3.1 of the Application Handbook). A summary of the requirements are listed below:
|
Direct food additives |
Definition:
Regulation:
Approval process for a new substances: Application to vary the code is required to approve the use of a new food additive or to change the permissions of a currently used food additive. The following information are required:
|
Food contact substances (e.g. components of packaging materials) |
Definition:
Guidance document:
Approval process for a new substances:
|
Flavouring agents |
Definition:
Regulation: Food Standard 1.3.1 Section 11 Guidance document: An application is generally not required for flavourings and therefore no guidance is provided in the Application Handbook Approval process for a new substances: Flavourings are regarded as food additives. An application is generally not required for flavourings |
Enzymes |
Definition:
Regulation: Enzymes are regulated as processing aids (below)Guidance document: Refer to processing aids (below) Approval process for a new substances: Refer to processing aids (below) |
Processing aids |
Definition: Processing aid means a substance listed in clauses 3–19 [of Standard 1.3.3] where:
Regulation: Food Standard 1.3.3 – Processing aids Guidance document:
Approval process for a new substances: Application to vary the code is required to approve the use of a new processing aid or to change the permissions of a currently used processing aid. The following information are required in the application:
|
Nanoscale materials |
Definition: The term “nanotechnology” is usually applied to the process of controlling the size and shape of materials at the atomic and molecular scale. Generally, the term is defined as deliberately engineered matter less than 100 nm in size in one dimension (http://www.foodstandards.gov.au/consumerinformation/nanotechnologyandfoo4542.cfm) Regulation: No authoritative statement found for food applications Guidance document: No specific guidance document found for food applications Approval process for a new substances:
Efforts towards developing standards and regulations (Locascio et al. 2011): National Industrial Chemicals Notification and Assessment Scheme (NICNAS) (http://www.nicnas.gov.au):
|
Table 3.
Regulatory authority |
Name: Ministry of Health (Ministério da Saude) through its regulatory agency Agencia Nacional de Vigilancia Sanitária (ANVISA – National Agency of Sanitary Surveillance) Website:
Historical overview: ANVISA was established by Law 9.782, as of 26 January 1999 Role/responsibility: The institutional purpose of the agency is to foster protection of the health of the population by exercising sanitary control over production and marketing of products and services subject to sanitary surveillance. The latter embraces premises and manufacturing processes, as well as the range of inputs and technologies concerned with the same. In addition, the agency exercises control over ports, airports and borders and also liaises with the Brazilian Ministry of Foreign Affairs and foreign institutions over matters concerning international aspects of sanitary surveillance |
Advisory scientific body |
Name: ANVISA is designated an autonomous agency operating under a special regime. This means that it is an independently administered, financially autonomous regulatory agency with security of tenure for its directors during the period of their mandates. It is managed by a Collegiate Board of Directors, comprised of five members Website: http://portal.anvisa.gov.br/wps/portal/anvisa/home Historical overview: No authoritative statement found Role/responsibility: ANVISA's function is to evaluate the safety of use of food additives and ingredients in foods. There are specific work groups, comprised of university professors who give technical support if needed. These groups work mainly in the approval of novel foods and novel food ingredients with functional health claims |
Framework regulations | No authoritative statement found |
Part of an overarching international organisation |
|
Recent and/or Pending changes | None known |
Regulatory overview of specific food chemical groups | |
Food ingredients |
Definition: As per GMC 26/03, food ingredients are defined as all substances, including food additives, which are used in the manufacture or preparation of foods and which are present in the final product in its original or modified form. Novel foods: These are the criteria for classification of novel foods: 1 – The following foods must be registered in the category of novel food, if they do not bear functional and/or health claims, given the criteria set out in Resolution No. 16/99: 1.1 – foods with no history of use in the country; 1.2 – foods containing novel ingredients, except those listed in Table 1; 1.3 – foods containing substances already consumed that may be added or used at levels much higher than those currently observed in the foods that constitute part of a regular diet; and 1.4 – food offered in the form of capsules, pills, tablets and the like Regulation: Brazil has a specific regulation for the approval of novel ingredients or novel foods. Novel foods (Resolution No. 16):
Approval process for a new substances: Pre-market application is required prior to sale (http://portal.anvisa.gov.br/wps/portal/anvisa/home) |
Direct food additives |
Definition: Defined by GMC 26/03, as any ingredient which added to foods intentionally, without intent to nurture, in order to modify the physical, chemical, biological or sensory characteristics of foods, during its manufacture, processing, preparation, processing, packaging, conditioning, storage, transport or during food handling: it will have, or it can be reasonably expected to have (directly or indirectly) as a result, that the additive itself or its by-products becomes part of that food. This term does not include contaminants or nutrients that are incorporated into a food in order to maintain or improve its nutritional properties. GMC 26/03 is currently under revision by Sub Work Group #3 (SGT#3) Mercosur and continues to be discussed and should be gazetted during 2012 Regulation:
Guidance document: http://www.anvisa.gov.br/alimentos/guia_pedidos.pdf Approval process for a new substances: All food additives that are not listed in GMC11/06 can be submitted for evaluation to ANVISA, who will then submit a request to the Mercosur Sub Work Group #3 to consider the revision of 11/06 and to proceed to its incorporation. Requests must be sent first for evaluation to ANVISA and comply with the guidance document listed on the website (http://www.anvisa.gov.br/alimentos/guia_pedidos.pdf) |
Food contact substances (e.g. components of packaging materials) |
Definition: According to GMC 26/03, food contact substances are defined as the primary container or primary wrapping or container (container that is in direct contact with food) Regulation: GMC 32/07:
Guidance document: No authoritative guidance document found Approval process for a new substances: Same as direct food additives |
Flavouring agents |
Definition: Flavouring agents are substances or mixtures of substances with odoriferous and/or flavour properties that are able to confer or enhance the aroma and/or taste of food. For the purpose of this Technical Regulation, flavourings/flavourings are classified as either natural or synthetic Regulation:
Guidance document: http://www.anvisa.gov.br/alimentos/guia_pedidos.pdf Approval process for a new substances: All flavouring agents that are not listed in GMC10/06 can be submitted for evaluation to ANVISA, who will then submit a request to the Mercosur Sub Work Group #3 to consider the revision of 10/06 and to proceed to its incorporation. Requests must be sent first for evaluation to ANVISA and comply with the guidance document listed on the website (http://www.anvisa.gov.br/alimentos/guia_pedidos.pdf) |
Enzymes |
Definition: Enzymes or enzyme preparations are defined as substances of animal, plant or microbial origin that act by promoting the desirable chemical reactions Regulation: Resolução RDC # 26 dated 05/27/2009. Enzymes regulations are not harmonised in Mercosur Guidance document: No authoritative guidance document found Approval process for a new substances: Submissions dossier should be addressed to ANVISA following the guidance document set forth at: http://www.an_visa.gov.br/al_imentos/guia_pedidos.pdf |
Processing aids |
Definition: Processing aids are any substances, excluding equipment and utensils, which are not consumed as it is as a food ingredient and which is intentionally used in the processing of raw materials, foods or ingredients, for a technological purpose during treatment or processing. It must be removed from the food or inactivated; the presence of traces of the substances or their derivatives may be admitted in the final product Regulation: GMC 18/93 Modificación RES. GMC 31/92 “Definicion y Principios fundamentales referente a empleo de aditivos, ingredientes, coadyuvante de elaboracion, contaminantes”. Resolución GMC No. 84/93 Guidance document: Processing aids are not harmonised in Mercosur, the only harmonised regulation is GMC 84/93 that establishes the definitions of the functions of processing aids (http://www.anvisa.gov.br/alimentos/guia_pedidos.pdf) Approval process for a new substances: Submissions dossier should be addressed to ANVISA following the guidance document set forth at: http://www.anvisa.gov.br/alimentos/guia_pedidos.pdf |
Nanoscale materials |
Definition: No authoritative statement found Regulation: No authoritative statement found Guidance document: No authoritative statement found Approval process for a new substances: No authoritative statement found Efforts towards developing standards and regulations (Locascio et al. 2011): Committee for the special study of nanotechnology (http://www.abnt.org.br):
|
Table 4.
Regulatory authority |
Name: Health Canada (HC) Food Directorate Website: http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/fn-an/index-eng.php (Health Canada 2011) Historical overview:
Role/responsibility:
|
Regulatory enforcement |
Name: Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA)
Website:
http://www.inspection.gc.ca/english/toce.shtml (CFIA 2011)
Historical overview:
Role/responsibility:
|
Framework regulations | Food and Drug Regulations: http://laws.justice.gc.ca/PDF/Regulation/C/C.R.C.,_c._870.pdf |
Part of an overarching international organisation |
|
Recent and/or pending changes | None known |
Regulatory overview of specific food chemical groups Food ingredients | Food ingredients are defined as an individual unit of food that is combined as an individual unit of food with one or more other individual units of food to form an integral unit of food that is sold as a pre-packaged product:
Regulation: Novel Foods – Division B.28 (http://laws.justice.gc.ca/eng/C.R.C.-C.870/page-1.html#anchorbo-ga:l_B-gb:l_28) Guidance document: A guidance document is available on novel foods, whether whole foods, food products or food ingredients, that are derived from plant or microbial sources. The safety assessment criteria for novel foods derived from animals are under development. Manufacturers or importers of novel foods derived from animal sources should consult with the Food Directorate to discuss which type of information is appropriate to the evaluation of the safety of a particular product (http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/fn-an/index-eng.php) Approval process for a new substances: The mechanism by which HC controls the sale of novel foods in Canada is the mandatory pre-market notification requirement as described in Division 28 of Part B of the Food and Drug Regulations. Manufacturers or importers are required under these regulations to submit information to HC regarding the product in question in order to determine the product's safety prior to sale. If the information provided in the notification for a novel food is not considered adequate to determine the novel food's safety, additional data supporting the safety of the food will be required. The type of information required to conduct the safety assessment of a novel food will depend on a number of factors such as the nature of the food, processing methods and the intended use. The approaches used to assess the safety of novel foods are outlined in the guidance document; however, the types of studies considered appropriate to demonstrate the safety of a novel food change with scientific knowledge and development. These guidelines are to be used in conjunction with information available in the scientific literature and from research and development conducted by the manufacturer. Since novel foods represent a diverse range of products, not all types of data outlined in the guidance document will be appropriate for a specific submission. Petitioners should consider the novel characteristics of their particular product when addressing the criteria in the guidance document. Consultation with the Food Directorate is encouraged during the development phase of a product to determine the specific data necessary to demonstrate the safety of the product. Information sufficient to establish that a novel food is safe for consumption may include experimental data as well as sound scientific rationales. To enhance the efficiency of the review process, petitioners should prepare their safety assessment data packages according to the following headings, as applicable:
|
Direct food additives |
Definition: According to the Food and Drugs Regulations B.01.001, “a food additive means any substance the use of which results, or may reasonably be expected to result, in it or its by-products becoming a part of or affecting the characteristics of a food, but does not include:
Regulation: Division B.16 (http://laws.justice.gc.ca/eng/CR.C-C.870/page-1.html) Guidance document: http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/fn-an/index-eng.php Approval process for a new substances: A submission for a food additive is required if a petitioner is seeking approval for use in Canada of a new food additive not currently regulated in the Food and Drug Regulations. A petitioner is also required to present a submission for an extension of use of an existing food additive, e.g. the use of an existing food additive in a different food or the use of a food additive at a higher maximum level of use. In these latter cases, there may not be a need to resubmit data already available at HC. The four possible scenarios are summarised as follows:
|
Food contact substances (e.g. components of packaging materials) |
Definition:
Regulation: Division 23, B.23.001 (http://laws.justice.gc.ca/eng/C.R.C.-C.870/page-1.html#anchorbo-ga:l_B-gb:l_23) Guidance document: Packaging materials (on a trade name basis, not by generic name) intended for use with foods in Canada may be submitted voluntarily to the Health Products and Food Branch (HPFB) for a pre-market assessment of their chemical safety and subsequent issuance of an advisory opinion on their acceptability in relation to Section B.23.001 of the Food and Drugs Act and Regulations dealing with the potential transfer of harmful chemicals to foods. Any type of material, whether it is in the form of a finished product such as a laminated film, a container, etc. or a formulated product such as a plastic resin, a colour concentrate, etc. may be submitted to the branch for a pre-market assessment. In addition, suppliers of single additives such as antioxidants, ultra violet absorbers, etc. may also independently request letters of opinion for their own products before selling them to formulators or converters. Thus, in terms of data requirements, food packaging submissions may be divided into two distinct categories namely, those on formulated products and finished articles, which are normally submitted by converters and formulators and those on specific constituents or single additives which usually originate from raw material suppliers Approval process for a new substances: The following information is provided as a guide to the food packaging industry to assist in the preparation of submissions to HPFB: 1. Formulated products and finished articles (formulators/converters). Two elements of information are required initially for a formulated product or a finished packaging article namely, the product's identity and its intended food packaging uses. The information to be provided under each element is as follows: Product identity:
|
Flavouring agents |
Definition: No authoritative statement found Regulation: No specific regulations on flavouring agents. Section 4 of the Food and Drug Act applies. No application/submission required for use of flavouring agents in food within Canada. Standards of identity and composition are available in Division B.10 pertaining to specific flavouring preparations (such as essences or extracts obtained from aromatic plants) (http://laws.justice.gc.ca/eng/C.R.C.-C.870/page-1.html#anchorbo-ga:l_B-gb:l_10). Flavours or flavouring preparations not mentioned in Division 10 are considered unstandardised food ingredients. Certain prohibitions exist in Section B.01.046. The definition of food additive excludes flavouring preparations. On request, the Bureau of Chemical Safety evaluates safety of use of these ingredients and issues a letter of opinion Guidance document: No authoritative guidance document found Approval process for a new substances: Applicants can voluntary request a letter of opinion on a flavouring agent (see “approval process for processing aids”) |
Enzymes |
Definition:
Regulation: Enzymes approved as food additives are listed within Table V of Section B.16.100 Listings of permitted enzymes as food additives include the common name of the enzyme, permitted sources of the enzyme, a list of the foods in which the enzyme may be used, and the maximum level of use Guidance document: See “Direct food additives” (above) Approval process for a new substances: See “Direct food additives” (above) |
Processing aids |
Definition: According to the Food Directorate, “a food processing aid is a substance that is used for a technical effect in food processing or manufacture, the use of which does not affect the intrinsic characteristics of the food and results in no or negligible residues of the substance or its by-products in or on the finished food”. This definition implies the absence of residues of any given chemical and its by-product in the final food product, which is different from Australia's definition of a processing aid (in which the absence of by-products is not mentioned). Also, characteristics of the final food must not be affected by the use of any given chemical classified as a processing aid. The definition of processing aid in Canada differs from the definition used by the Codex Alimentarius Commission. The CAC definition does not have a limitation on residue levels and does not refer to affecting the characteristics of the food. These restrictions must be included in the Directorate's definition because a substance is considered to be a food additive, under the Canadian regulatory definition of food additive, if use of the substance results in residues in the food or affects the characteristics of the food Regulation: There is no regulatory definition of food processing aid in Canada. Canadian regulators have typically used “processing aid” in an informal manner for substances used as adjuncts in food processing and manufacture. Most processing aids are not mentioned in the Regulations and unlike food additives, there is no regulatory requirement for preclearance of new processing aids by the Minister of Health. Like all substances used with food, the use of a processing aid is ultimately controlled by Section 4, Part I of the Act which states: “No person shall sell an article of food that:
Guidance document: Not applicable Approval process for a new substances: The use of a processing aid does not require a submission like a food additive but a petitioner may seek a so-called “Letter of Opinion” from the Bureau of Chemical Safety of HC's Food Directorate, confirming that, under its conditions of use, the substance in question is considered to be a processing aid and is acceptable for use. |
Nanoscale materials |
Definition: Nanotechnology is described as the application of nanoscience to develop new materials and products, and involves the manipulation of matter at the nanometre scale. In the food sector, nanotechnology could be used to preserve food, improve nutritional values and enhance flavours (http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/dhp-mps/nano-eng.php) (Health Canada 2009b). Health Canada considers any manufactured product, material, substance, ingredient, device, system or structure to be nanomaterial if:
Regulation: No authoritative statement found. No reference to nanomaterials is stated in the acts and regulations; however, HC is using the existing legislative and regulatory framework to regulate applications of nanotechnology, but it is recognised that new approaches may be necessary in future to keep pace with the advances in this area. Within the Health Portfolio, a Nanotechnology Working Group has been established to gather information, identify areas where additional regulations may need to be considered, and to act as a discussion forum for issues related to nanotechnology (http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/dhp-mps/nano-eng.php) Guidance document: Only general guidance has been given (http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/sr-sr/pubs/nano/pol-eng.php). In order to identify and assess potential risks and benefits (where applicable) of nanomaterials, the following types of information may be required, when relevant:
Approval process for a new substances: No authoritative statement found Efforts towards developing standards and regulations (Locascio et al. 2011):
|
Table 5.
Regulatory authority |
Name: Ministry of Health (MOH) Website: http://www.moh.gov.cn/publicfiles//business/htmlfiles/wsb/index.htm (Ministry of Health of the People's Republic of China 2010) Historical overview: Established 21 November 1949 Role/responsibility:
|
Advisory scientific body |
Name: Same as Regulatory authority (above) Website: Same as Regulatory authority (above) Historical overview: Same as Regulatory authority (above) Role/responsibility: Same as Regulatory authority (above) |
Framework regulations |
|
Part of an overarching international organisation |
|
Recent and/or pending changes | None known |
Regulatory overview of specific food chemical groups | |
Food ingredients |
Definition of food ingredients: any substance, including a food additive, used in the manufacture or preparation of a food and present in the final product although possibly in a modified form. Novel foods are referred to as new resource foods, which are defined as raw food materials or food ingredients, which do not have a significant history of consumption in China (Roberts & Rogerson 2008). Novel foods are separated into four categories:
Regulation: Order No. 56 Administrative Measures on Novel FoodGuidance document: English translation of the guidance is available at: http://www.fas.usda.gov/gainfiles/200704/146280956.pdf (USDA 2007) Approval process for a new substances: Premarket application demonstrating safety of the novel food. Applications for novel food shall include the following:
|
Direct food additives |
Definition: “An artificially chemosynthetic or natural substance to be added to foods in order to improve food quality, colour, fragrance and taste, and for the purpose of preservation and processing technology. Nutrition enhancers, gum-based substances in chewing gum, flavouring agents, and processing aids in the food industry are also included in food additives.” Permitted food additives (including colouring agents, sweeteners, and flavour enhancers) are classified according to their function with permitted maximum levels indicated (USDA 2008). A new food additive is a food additive that:
Regulation:
Guidance document: Order No. 73: Measures for Administration of New Food Additives (as of 10 March 2010) (http://gain.fas.usda.gov/Recent%20GAIN%20Publications/Food%20Additive%20Registration_Beijing_China%20-%20Peoples%20Republic%20of5-12-2010.pdf) (USDA 2010b) Approval process for a new substances: Pre-market application demonstrating technological need and safety of the additive. The application shall include:
|
Food contact substances (e.g. components of packaging materials) |
Definition: All materials in contact with the food including the food containers, packaging materials and the things which contact the food in the course of manufacture, transport, sale and serve. The licensing scope of the food-related new product varieties includes:
Regulation: Hygienic Standards for Additives Used In Food Containers and Packaging Materials (GB 9685) Guidance document: Rules on Administrative Licensing of Food-Related New Product Varieties (Notified to the WTO as G/SPS/N/CHN/120 on 13 August 2009) Approval process for a new substances: Premarket application demonstrating technological need and safety of the additive. If an additive in the food containers or packaging materials meets the following conditions, such additive shall be an exemptible substance and does not need to be reported for examination and approval:
|
Flavouring agents |
Definition: Flavourings (flavour compound):
Regulation: National Standard of the People's Republic of China – Flavourings (TBT/N/CHN/575)Guidance document: See “Direct food additives” (above) Approval process for a new substances: See “Direct food additives” (above) |
Enzymes |
Definition: “Biological products directly extracted from edible or non-edible parts of a plant or animal or fermented and extracted from traditional or genetically modified microorganisms (including but not limited to bacteria, actinomycetes, and fungi) that are used in food processing and have a special catalytic function.” A list of allowable food enzyme preparations is available (Annex C, People's Republic of China, 2010) Regulation: Hygienic Standard for Enzyme Preparations Used in Food Processing (Notified to the WTO as G/SPS/N/CHN/112 on 5 January 2009) Guidance document: See “Direct food additives” (above) Approval process for a new substances: See “Direct food additives” (above) |
Processing aids |
Definition: A substance or material (not including apparatus or utensils), and not consumed as a food ingredient by itself, and only used to fulfil a certain technological purpose during processing or treatment. Processing aids refers to various kinds of substances to enable food processing to go smoothly, irrelative to food itself, e.g. filtration aids, clarifiers, absorbents, lubricants, mould release agents, decolouring agents, peeling agents, extraction solvents, and nutritional substances for fermentation, etc. Processing aids are regulated under food additives Regulation: See “Direct food additives” (above) Guidance document: See “Direct food additives” (above) Approval process for a new substances: See “Direct food additives” (above) |
Nanoscale materials |
Definition: Nanoscience and nanotechnology encompass studying the characteristics (manipulating of atom and molecular) and interactions (primary quantum effect) of the matter on nanometre (1–100 nm) scale, as well as the interdisciplinary science and technology using these characteristics. It extends a human's method and ability on understanding and changing the physical world to atomic and molecular level (http://english.nanoctr.cas.cn) (NCNST 2010) Regulation: No regulations pertaining to nanoscale materials are available Guidance document: No authoritative guidance document found Approval process for a new substances: No authoritative statement found Efforts towards developing standards and regulations: Ministry of Science and Technology:
|
Table 6.
Regulatory authority |
Name: European Commission (EC) – Directorate General for Health and Consumers Website: http://ec.europa.eu/food/food/index_en.htm (EC 2011) Historical overview:
Role/responsibility:
|
Advisory scientific body |
Name: European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) Website: http://www.efsa.europa.eu/ Historical overview:
Role/responsibility: The Authority shall provide scientific advice and scientific and technical support for the Community's legislation and policies in all fields which have a direct or indirect impact on food and feed safety. It shall provide independent information on all matters within these fields and communicate on risks (178/2002/EC, article 22) |
Framework regulations | 178/2002/EC General principles and requirements of food law, establishing the EFSA and laying down procedures in matters of food safety |
Part of an overarching international organisation |
|
Recent and/or pending changes | On 16 December 2008, the regulations of the Package on Food Improvement Agents were adopted. This includes regulations on food additives, food enzymes, and flavourings and food ingredients with flavouring properties, and an additional fourth regulation (Regulation (EC) No. 1331/2008, adopted on 16 December 2010) establishing a common authorisation procedure for additives, enzymes, and flavourings |
Regulatory overview of specific food chemical groups | |
Food ingredients | Food ingredients are defined as:
Regulation: Regulation 258/97/EC for Novel Foods (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexapi!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&_numdoc=31997R0258&model=guichett) Guidance document: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:31997H0618:EN:HTML Approval process for a new substances: Foods commercialised in at least one member state before the entry into force of the Regulation on Novel Foods on 15 May 1997, are on the EU market under the “principle of mutual recognition”. In order to ensure the highest level of protection of human health, novel foods must undergo a safety assessment before being placed on the EU market. Only those products considered to be safe for human consumption are authorised for marketing. Companies who want to place a novel food on the EU market need to submit their application in accordance with Commission Recommendation 97/618/EC, which outlines the scientific information and the safety assessment report required |
Novel foods or novel food ingredients may follow a simplified procedure, only requiring notifications from the company, when they are considered by a national food assessment body as “substantially equivalent” to existing foods or food ingredients (as regards to their composition, nutritional value, metabolism, intended use, and the level of undesirable substances contained therein) | |
Direct food additives |
Definition: Food additives are substances that are not normally consumed as food itself but are added to food intentionally for a technological purpose described in Regulation (EC) No. 1333/2008, e.g. such as the preservation of food. All food additives should be covered by this Regulation, and therefore in the light of scientific progress and technological development the list of functional classes should be updated (currently there are 26 functional classes listed in the Annex I to Regulation (EC) No. 1333/2008). However, substances should not be considered as food additives when they are used for the purpose of imparting flavour and/or taste or for nutritional purposes, such as salt replacers, vitamins and minerals. Moreover, substances considered as foods which may be used for a technological function, such as sodium chloride or saffron for colouring, and food enzymes also should not fall within the scope of Regulation (EC) No. 1333/2008. However, preparations obtained from foods and other natural source material that are intended to have a technological effect in the final food and which are obtained by selective extraction of constituents (e.g. pigments) relative to the nutritive or aromatic constituents, should be considered additives within the meaning of Regulation (EC) No. 1333/2008. The new Regulation (EC) No. 1333/2008 does not apply to the following substances unless they are used as food additives:
Regulation: Regulation (EC) No. 1333/2008 includes the Community list of approved food additives for use in foods and conditions of use (Annex II as amended by Commission Regulation (EU) No. 1129/2011) and the Community list of food additives approved for use in food additives, food enzymes, food flavourings and nutrients and their condition of use (Annex III as amended by Commission Regulation (EU) No. 1130/2011). Food additives in Annex II are listed on the basis of the categories of food to which they may be added. Food additives in Annex III are listed on the basis of the food additives, food enzymes, food flavourings and nutrients or categories thereof to which they may be added. Before these Community lists apply (1 June 2013) the Annexes to Directives 94/35/EC, 94/36/EC and 95/2/EC are still valid. A food additive may be included in the Community lists only if it meets general conditions: no safety concerns at the level of use proposed; there is a technological need; the consumer is not misled; and there are advantages and benefits for the consumer. Other more specific conditions exist for sweeteners and colours. Links to more information on food additives including the legislation are available at: http://ec.europa.eu/food/food/fAEF/additives/framework_reg_fA_en.htm/. All authorised food additives have to fulfil purity criteria which are set out in detail in three Commission Directives (EC) No. 10/2009 (food additives other than sweeteners and colours, amending Directive 2008/84/EC), 2008/60/EC (sweeteners), and 2008/128/EC (colours). It should be noted that new regulations on purity criteria were adopted on 9 March 2012 (Regulation (EU) No. 231/2012 on specifications for food additives listed in Annexes II and III) which will repeal the mentioned directives as of 1 December 2012. Food additives must be kept under continuous observation and must be re-evaluated whenever necessary in the light of changing conditions of use and new scientific information. Therefore, when the EC is informed about new scientific evidence relating to a permitted food additive, it requests EFSA to assess the new data. In addition to this ongoing observation the EC has also asked the EFSA to undertake a re-evaluation of all currently permitted food additives (Regulation (EU) No. 257/2010). Regulation (EC) No. 1333/2008 on food additives:
Guidance document: The Practical Guidance for Applicants was prepared to provide applicants with information that aims at facilitating the preparation and submission of applications for establishing or updating (adding, removing or changing conditions, specifications or restrictions) the Community lists. The links to other relevant documents are made in this guidance (http://ec.europa.eu/food/food/fAEF/authorisation_application_en.htm) as well as additional guidancedocuments (EFSA Panel 2012) Approval process for a new substances: Applicants who wish to introduce new additives into the EU market, or seeking to revise existing provisions regulating individual additives already authorised within the EU, or seeking confirmation that an already approved additive made from a new source or by a new method of production is acceptable, must submit an application. Beside the Practical Guidance for Applicants there is also the Guidance on Submissions for Food Additive Evaluations by the SCF which provides details on the administrative and technical data required, and the range of toxicological tests generally required for new food additives, and on the format for formal submissions on additives. It must be noted that EFSA is preparing a new guidance document, which will replace the old one. The requirements for the application are also mentioned in Regulation (EU) 234/2011, which implements Regulation (EC) No. 1331/2008. The general requirements consist of:
|
Food contact substances (e.g. components of packaging materials) |
Definition: Food contact materials and articles are those which in their finished state are intended to be brought into contact with food, or are already brought into contact with food and intended for that purpose or can reasonably be expected to be brought into contact with food or to transfer their constituents to food under normal and foreseeable conditions of use. This includes packaging materials but also cutlery, dishes, processing machines, containers etc. The term also includes materials and articles that are in contact with water intended for human consumption but it does not cover fixed public or private water supply equipment Regulation: Framework Regulation (EC) No. 1935/2004. Food contact materials should be safe and should not transfer their components into the foodstuff in unacceptable quantities. The transfer of constituents from food contact materials into food is referred to as migration. In the context of the framework Regulation, specific Regulations on plastics (10/2011/EU), Active and intelligent (A&I) FCM substances (450/2009/EC), Recycling of plastics (282/2008/EC), Regenerate cellulose (Directive 2007/42/EC), ceramics (Directive 84/500/EEC) have been published. The specific Regulation on plastic FCM contains a positive list of monomers and additives, which can be used for their manufacture. The EU Food Contact Materials Database lists all approvals and conditions of use from the above Regulations and Directives. It is available at: https://webgate.ec.europa.eu/sanco_foods/main/?event=display/. To ensure the protection of the health of the consumer and to avoid any contamination of the foodstuff, two types of migration limits have been established for plastic materials:
Guidance document: The guidance document on the submission of a food contact material for evaluation by EFSA by the Panel on Additives, Flavourings, Processing Aids, and Materials in Contact with Food is available at: http://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/scdocs/scdoc/21r.htm Approval process for a new substances: General requirements include:
|
Flavouring agents |
Definition: Flavouring substances are defined chemical substances that include flavouring substances obtained by chemical synthesis or isolated using chemical processes, and natural flavouring substances. Flavourings are used to improve or modify the odour and/or taste of foods for the benefit of the consumer. Flavourings and food ingredients with flavouring properties should only be used if they fulfil the criteria specified in Regulation (EC) No. 1334/2008. They must be safe when used, and certain flavourings should therefore undergo a risk assessment before they can be permitted in food Regulation: New Regulation (EC) No. 1334 was adopted on 16 December 2008; however, as of 20 January 2011, this new regulation repeals Directives 88/388/EEC and 91/71/EEC. In order to protect human health, this Regulation should cover flavourings, source materials for flavourings and foods containing flavourings. It should also cover certain food ingredients with flavouring properties which are added to food for the main purpose of adding flavour and which contribute significantly to the presence in food of certain naturally occurring undesirable substances (hereinafter referred to as food ingredients with flavouring properties), their source material and foods containing them. The Regulation sets out flavourings and source materials for which an evaluation and approval is required. The Regulation prohibits the addition of certain substances as such to food and sets maximum levels for certain substances, which are naturally present in flavourings and in food ingredients with flavourings properties, but which may raise concern for human health. As of 20 January 2010, Regulation (EC) No. 1334/2008 on flavouring and certain food ingredients with flavouring properties amended the following: Council Regulation (EEC) No. 1601/91, Regulations (EC) No. 2232/96 and (EC) No. 110/2008, and Directive 2000/13/EC; however, Regulation (EC) No. 2232/96, laying down a Community procedure for flavouring substances, will continue to apply until the date of application of the Union list of flavourings and source materials. Smoke flavourings are regulated under Regulation (EC) No. 2065/2003 Guidance document: The guidance document is available at: http://ec.europa.eu/food/food/fAEF/authorisation_application_en.htm Approval process for a new substances: After the completion of the evaluation programme but at the latest by 31 December 2010, the EU list of flavouring substances for use in or on foods in the EU shall be adopted [Article 5 (1) of Regulation (EC) No. 2232/96]. New substances follow the authorisation procedure laid down in Regulation (EC) No. 1331/2008 on the common authorisation procedure for food additives, food enzymes and food flavourings. Data requirements for flavouring substance application include:
|
Enzymes |
Definition: A food enzyme is defined as a product obtained from plants, animals or microorganisms or products thereof including a product obtained by a fermentation process using microorganism containing one or more enzymes capable of catalysing a specific biochemical reaction and added to food for a technological purpose at any stage of the manufacturing, processing, preparation, treatment, packaging, transport or storage of foods. A food enzyme preparation is defined as a formulation consisting of one or more food enzymes in which substances such as food additives and/or other food ingredients are incorporated to facilitate their storage, sale, standardisation, dilution or dissolution (see Article 3 of Regulation (EC) No. 1332/2008). Regulation (EC) No. 1332/2008 does not include food enzymes used in the production of food additives falling within the scope of Regulation (EC) No. 1333/2008 or processing aids. The scope of this Regulation does not extend to enzymes that are not added to food to perform a technological function but are intended for human consumption, such as enzymes for nutritional or digestive purposes Regulation: Regulation (EC) No. 1332/2008 on food enzymes amends Council Directive 83/417/EEC, Council Regulation (EC) No. 1493/1999, Directive 2000/13/EC, Council Directive 2001/112/EC and Regulation (EC) No. 258/97. This Regulation harmonises for the first time the rules for food enzymes in the EU. It applies from 20 January 2009, except labelling provisions which apply from 20 January 2010. National provisions concerning the placing on the market and the use of food enzymes and food produced with food enzymes continue to apply in the member states until the adoption of the Union list of enzymes applies. According to Regulation (EC) No. 1332/2008, only food enzymes included in the Community list may be placed on the market as such and used in foods, in accordance with the specifications and conditions of use provided for in Article 7 Commission's website: http://ec.europa.eu/food/food/fAEF/enzymes/index_en.htm EFSA's guidance on food enzymes. Guidance document: Approval process for a new substances: Food enzymes shall be subject to safety evaluation by EFSA and approval via an EU list. A 2-year period has been fixed in this Regulation for submission of applications on existing enzymes and new enzymes. This period started on 11 September. The inclusion of a food enzyme in the EU list will be considered by the Commission on the basis of Article 6 of Regulation (EC) No. 1332/2008, namely the opinion from EFSA, and also other general criteria such as technological need and consumer aspects. For every food enzyme included in the positive list, specifications including the purity criteria and the origin of the food enzyme shall be laid down. Data required for risk assessment and for risk management of food enzymes are laid down inRegulation (EC) No. 234/2011 |
Processing aids |
Definition: According to Article 3.2(b) of Regulation (EC) No. 1333/2088 a processing aid shall mean any substance which is not consumed as a food by itself; is intentionally used in the processing of raw materials, foods or their ingredients, to fulfil a certain technological purpose during treatment or processing; and may result in the unintentional but technically unavoidable presence in the final product of residues of the substance or its derivatives provided they do not present any health risk and do not have any technological effect on the final product Regulation: Processing aids are not harmonised at EU level with the exception of food enzymes used as processing aids (see above “enzymes”) and extraction solvents used in the production of foodstuffs and food ingredients (Directive 2009/32/EC). If a processing aid does not meet the criteria outlined in the definition (above), it can be regulated as a food additive, and the applicable Regulation (EC) No. 1333/2008 (regulations for food additive) would be applicable Guidance document: Refer to direct food additives Approval process for a new substances: There is no approval process for processing aids at the EU level |
Nanoscale materials |
Definition: The Commission has adopted a Recommendation for a definition of “nanomaterial” for regulatory purposes which it intends to integrate progressively and where necessary in the EU food Law (http://europa.eu/rapid/pressReleasesAction.do?reference=IP/11/1202&_format=HTML&_aged=0&_language=EN&_guiLanguage=en) (Stamm et al. 2012) Regulation: Existing legislation covers in principle the potential health, safety and environmental risks in relation to nanomaterials. Recently, specific provisions on the risk assessment of nanomaterials were introduced in EU legislation on food additives and food contact materials (EC 2009). A definition of “engineered nanomaterial” and a mandatory labelling requirement for all food ingredients containing such nanomaterials were introduced in the Regulation on Food Information to consumers. For example, food additives that are prepared through nanotechnology would be considered as new additives. In Article 12 of 1333/2008/EC, “when a food additive is already included in a Community list and there is a significant change in its production methods or in the starting materials used, or there is a change in particle size, for example through nanotechnology, the food additive prepared by those new methods or materials shall be considered as a different additive and a new entry in the Community lists or a change in the specifications shall be required before it can be placed on the market” Guidance document: In November 2009, the EC asked EFSA to prepare a guidance document on how to assess potential risks related to certain food-related uses of nanotechnology. Given the knowledge which is currently available, the guidance to be developed will provide practical recommendations on how to assess applications from industry to use engineered nanomaterials in food additives, enzymes, flavourings, food contact materials, novel foods, food supplements, feed additives, and pesticides. The proposed guidance document was published and comments requested. This guidance document was published in May 2011 (http://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/efsajournal/doc/2140.pdf) Approval process for a new substances: No authoritative statement found Efforts towards developing standards and regulations: The EC has given the Finnish Institute of Occupational Health (FIOH), and Finland as a country, the opportunity to coordinate the EU-funded Nano Safety Cluster, which is a cluster of projects promoting nanomaterial safety:
|
Table 7.
Regulatory authority |
Name: Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (MHLW) Website: http://www.mhlw.go.jp/english/index.html (MHLW 2011a) Historical overview:
Role/responsibility:
|
Advisory scientific body |
Name: Food Safety Commission (FSC) Website: http://www.fsc.go.jp/english/index.html Historical overview: The FSC was established on 1 July 2003, as a part of Japanese Cabinet Office, following the founding regulation of Food Safety Basic Law Role/responsibility: The FSC's core role is risk assessment of food-associated hazards that are potentially contained in food including chemical substances (e.g. food additives, pesticides and veterinary medicines), biological (e.g. microorganisms and natural toxins), and novel foods. The FSC also emphasises risk communication on food-related hazards to the general public and also provides emergency response in the case of food poisoning outbreaks |
Framework regulations |
|
Part of an overarching international organisation |
|
Recent and/or pending changes |
|
Regulatory overview of specific food chemical groups | |
Food ingredients |
Definition: Foods (including food ingredients) are defined as all foods and drinks; provided, however, this term does not include drugs and quasi-drugs in the Pharmaceutical Affairs Law (Article 4, Food Sanitation Law) (JETRO 2006). Novel foods: Novel foods are not defined under Japanese jurisdiction. There are no specific approval procedures for new food or food ingredients. The FSC conducts safety assessment for novel foods that are derived from a genetically modified organism (GMO). The MHLW may prohibit the sale of a food, which could possibly injure human health according to the opinion of the Pharmaceutical Affairs and Food Sanitation Council (Article 7 of the Food Sanitation law). This includes:
Regulation: No authoritative statement found Guidance document: No authoritative guidance document found Approval process for a new substances: No authoritative statement found |
Direct food additives |
Definition:
Establishment of specifications and standards: Usually, people continue to consume food additives throughout their lifetime; thus, food additives must be subjected to stringent regulations. All designated chemicals, with a few exceptions, and some natural additives (existing food additives) are currently regulated by specifications and/or standards. These specifications and standards include specifications concerning chemical and physical characteristics, and standards for manufacturing, storage, and use. These standards, along with labelling and storage standards are published in an official compilation of food additives, entitled “Japan's Specifications and Standards for use of Food Additives” (MHLW 2000) Guidance document: A guidance document on food additives is available at: http://www.ffcr.or.jp/zaidan/FFCRHOME.nsf/pages/PDF/FILE/Guideline.pdf Approval process for a new substances: The procedures required to apply for designation of a new substance intended to be used as a food additive pursuant to Article 6 of the Food Sanitation Law or for revision of standards for use of a food additive pursuant to Article 7, paragraph 1 of the Food Sanitation Law are provided within the guidance document. A checklist is provided in the last page of the guidance document, which outlines the requirements. It should be noted that all documents should be completed in Japanese; however, all documents except for the summary may be submitted in English. A brief summary of the general requirements include:
|
Food contact materials (e.g. components of packaging materials) |
Definition: No authoritative statement found Regulation: No regulations are available on food contact materials. In 1973, the Japan Hygienic Olefin and Styrene Plastics Association (JHOSPA) established the industry's voluntary standards composed of a positive list describing raw materials that can be used safely for food utensils, containers, packaging materials, and the Standard Methods of Analysis that defined specifications for each resin. JHOSPA aims to carry out activities to prevent sanitary hazards caused by food utensils, containers, and packaging materials Guidance document: No authoritative guidance document found Approval process for a new substances: No authoritative statement found |
Flavouring agents |
Definition: Natural flavouring agents are defined as food additives intended for use in flavouring food and are substances obtained from animals or plants, or mixtures thereof (The Food Sanitation Act, Article 4, Paragraph 3) (JETRO 2006). No specifications are established for natural flavouring agents Regulation: http://www.fantastic-flavour.com/files-downloads/flavour_agents_japan.pdf Guidance document: Refer to direct food additives (above) Approval process for a new substances: Refer to direct food additives (above) |
Enzymes |
Definition: No authoritative statement found Regulation: Enzymes listed as a permitted food additive can be used in food under the conditions indicated; however, for enzymes produced by genetically modified microorganisms, a safety assessment would be required under Standards for the Safety Assessment of Food (additives) Produced Using Genetically Modified Microorganisms (only available in Japanese) Guidance document: No authoritative guidance document found Approval process for a new substances: No authoritative statement found |
Processing aids |
Definition: Processing aids defined under labelling standards according to the Food Sanitation Law (JETRO 2006) are substances added to a food in processing the food which are (1) removed from the food before the completion of the food; (2) derived from raw materials of the food and converted into components normally included in the food but do not significantly increase the amounts of the components; or (3) present in the finished food at insignificant levels but do not have any technical or functional effect of these components on the food Regulation: Processing aids are regulated under the same process as food additives. Processing aids that are listed on the permitted list of food additives are permitted for use in foods (Government of Japan 2002) Guidance document: Refer to direct food additives (above) Approval process for a new substances: Refer to direct food additives (above) |
Nanoscale materials |
Definition: No authoritative statement found Regulation: No authoritative statement found Guidance document: No authoritative guidance document found Approval process for a new substances: No authoritative statement found Efforts towards developing standards and regulations (Locascio et al. 2011): The National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST) has sponsored several projects at the Ministry of Economy Trade and Industry (METI) since 2005 (http://www.aist.go.jp/):
|
Table 8.
Regulatory authority |
Name: Ministry of Health (SSA) through the Federal Commission for the Protectionagainst Sanitary Risks (COFEPRIS 2010) Website: http://www.cofepris.gob.mx Historical overview: COFEPRIS was established 5 July 2001 with the publication of the “Decreto de Creación de la Comisión Federal para la Protección contra Riesgos Sanitarios (COFEPRIS)” in the “Diario Oficial de la Federación”. This decree established the structure and organisation of a decentralised administrative office with technical, administrative and operative autonomy responsible for the implementation of its legal attributes as related to sanitary regulation, control and support as stated in the General Health Law and other applicable regulations. This new Commission is composed of different General Directions that include: The General Direction of Drugs and Health Technologies, Sanitary Control of Products and Services, Environmental Health, The National Public Health Laboratory and the Direction of Sanitary Control of Publicity Role/responsibility: According to the General Health Law, the Ministry of Health will enforce its legal attributes as related to sanitary regulation, control and support through the Federal Commission for the Protection Against Sanitary Risks as related to (Art. 17 bis):
|
Advisory scientific body |
Name: See “regulatory authority” (above) Website: See “regulatory authority” (above) Historical overview: See “regulatory authority” (above) Role/responsibility: See “regulatory authority” (above) |
Framework regulations | For foods the following regulations apply:
|
Part of an overarching international organisation |
|
Recent and/or pending changes |
|
Regulatory overview of specific food chemical groups | |
Food ingredients |
Definition of a food ingredient: Any substance or product including the additives that is used in the manufacture, elaboration, preparation or treatment of a food or non-alcoholic beverage and that is present in the final product transformed or not. There are no regulations pertaining to new food ingredients or novel foods Regulation: No authoritative statement found Guidance document: No authoritative guidance document found Approval process for new substances: No authoritative statement found |
Definition: Food additives are defined as those substances added directly to food and drinks during its manufacture in order to provide or intensify aroma, colour or flavour, to improve its stability or its preservation. The term does not include contaminants, substances added to foods to maintain or to improve the nutritional quality, or sodium chloride. Additives always perform a technological function in the final product (USDA 2009) Regulation:
Guidance document: Agreement that establishes the substances allowed as additives and processing aids in foods, beverages and nutritional supplements Approval process for a new substances: Through technical consultation presenting a technical dossier to request approval and inclusion in the positive list. After an official approval is obtained, it is important to follow up to ensure that the substance is included in the next update of the positive list (agreement) and any updated applicable NOMs |
|
Food contact substances (e.g. components of packaging materials) |
Definition: No authoritative statement found Regulation: The Regulation on Sanitary Control of Products and Services (Reglamento de Control Sanitario de Productos y Servicios – 24th Title) Guidance document: No authoritative guidance document found Voluntary Mexican Norms (NMX) may be available for specific products Approval process for new substances: No specific process. Any approval should be obtained through technical consultation. Although there is no specific, formal process, most major customers will require legal confirmation that a specific compound is allowed. If a company wants to be sure that the product is allowed, then they should consult with the authorities |
Flavouring agents |
Definition: Substance or blend of substances of natural origin, identical to natural or synthetic with or without solvents and with or without the addition of other additives that are used to give or intensify flavours or aromas to products Regulation: Same as food additives Guidance document: Same as food additives Approval process for new substances: Same as food additives. Usually when the positive list is updated, the FEMA-GRAS lists are reviewed for inclusion |
Enzymes |
Definition: Biological catalyser protein substance produced by live cells that catalyse specific reactions in diverse production processes. Source: The Regulation on Sanitary Control of Products and Services Regulation: Same as food additives Guidance document: Same as food additives Approval process for a new substances: Same as food additives |
Processing aids |
Definition: Substance or material, excluding instruments, utensils and additives that is not consumed as a food ingredient by itself and is used intentionally in the production of raw materials, foods or their ingredients to achieve a technological function during the treatment or processing and that can lead to the unintentional presence of residues or derivatives in the final product. Colour aid is the substance that is used to intensify, retain or develop colour Regulation: Same as food additives Guidance document: Same as food additives Approval process for a new substances: Same as food additives |
Nanoscale materials |
Definition: No authoritative statement found Regulation: No authoritative statement found Guidance document: No authoritative guidance document found Approval process for a new substances: No authoritative statement found Any specific approval should be obtained through technical consultation Efforts towards developing standards and regulations: None known |
Comparison of the regulatory systems and regulations for food substances in the different jurisdictions
Overview
In general, each of the target countries has a regulatory system in place for the scientific evaluation and approval of food additives, food ingredients, and food contact substances; however, several are undergoing change, refinement and working towards harmonisation with other countries. The EU has recently adopted new regulations, which establish a common authorisation procedure for food additives and, for the first time, food enzymes and flavouring agents. Prior to the implementation of these new regulations, food enzymes and flavourings were regulated at the national level for each member state.
Similar to the EU, other regional bodies representing multiple nations have been established and are working to harmonise food standards for member countries. Australia and New Zealand have harmonised their food standards, which are maintained by Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ). Thus, Australia and New Zealand (NZ) have joint labelling and compositional standards under the Australia NZ Food Standard Code; however, there are separate standards that are not part of the joint food standards setting system, covering food safety, agricultural compounds and veterinary medicines, and primary food production and processing. These are covered in the Code but apply to Australia only. Equivalent NZ standards are developed and administered by the NZ Ministry for Primary Industries (MPI) (formerly MAF). MPI is responsible for implementation and enforcement of food standards and requirements for exported foods. Furthermore, in NZ there is a standard for supplemented foods allowing foods to be modified in a way that is beyond what is permitted under the Food Standards Code. The Supplemented Food Standard was introduced in March 2010 to regulate food type products previously sold under the NZ Dietary Supplements Regulations. However, supplemented foods must comply with most sections of the Code including the food additive requirements.
In South America, the South American Common Market, known as Mercosur, represents Brazil, Argentina, Uruguay, Paraguay and Venezuela. While these nations do have their own regulatory systems in place, many of their food standards are gradually being replaced by official Mercosur standards as they are developed.
Regulatory authorities
Table 10 outlines the regulatory authorities and the Advisory Scientific Body/Regulatory Enforcement Agency for each of the target countries. Labelling and compositional standards for both Australia and New Zealand are developed by FSANZ; thus, these regulations discussed within this report will be identical for both countries. The EU regulations apply verbatim in all member states.
Table 10.
Argentina | Australia/New Zealand | Brazil | Canada | China | European Union | Japan | Mexico | USA | |
Regulatory authority | Ministry of Health (Ministerio de Salud) and The National Administration of Drugs, Foods, and Medical Technology (Administration Nacional de Medicamentos, Alimentos y Tecnología Médica – ANMAT) | Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ); New Zealand Ministry for Primary Industries (MPI) (formerly Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry – MAF) | Ministry of Health (Ministério da Saude) | Health Canada (HC) | Ministry of Health (MOH) | European Commission (EC) – Directorate General for Health and Consumers | Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (MHLW) | Ministry of Health(SSA) through the Federal Commission for the Protection against Sanitary Risks(COFEPRIS) | US Food and Drug Administration (USFDA) |
Advisory scientific body | National Committee of Food (CONAL) | FSANZ Board, FSANZ Fellows, and Scientific Advisory Groups | National Health Surveillance Agency; Agencia Nacional de Vigilancia Sanitária (ANVISA) | Same as above | Same as above | European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) | Food Safety Commission | Same as above | USFDA Science Board; USFDA Food Advisory Committee |
Participation in international organisations
All the target countries (Argentina, Australia, Brazil, Canada, China, Japan, Mexico, New Zealand, the EU and US) are members of the WTO and CAC. In addition, Argentina and Brazil follow Mercosur standards. Mercosur was established in 1991 and encompasses Argentina, Brazil, Uruguay, Paraguay and, as of 2006, Venezuela. Mercosur standards are influenced by the EU, CAC and USFDA. For further details, see the individual summary Tables 1–9. A summary of the target countries and their participation in international organisations is presented in Table 11.
Table 11.
Argentina | Australia/New Zealand | Brazil | Canada | China | European Union | Japan | Mexico | USA | |
Member of CODEX | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Member of the World Trade Organization | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Additional participation in international organisations | Mercosur | − | Mercosur | – | – | – | – | – | – |
Direct food additives
Food additives are defined and regulated among Argentina, Australia/New Zealand, Brazil, Canada, China, the EU, Japan, Mexico and the US. Although, the precise definition of a food additive differs among the target countries, in general a food additive is defined as a substance added to foods intentionally and to achieve a technological function in the final product. In each of these countries a permitted list of food additives is published and available to the public. The permitted list contains food additives, which are deemed safe for human consumption under the specified conditions of use. In all target countries except the US, if a food additive is not on the permitted list or its use is not permitted in a particular food and an applicant wants to use the food additive, the applicant must submit an application to approve its use in the respective country, following the conditions and requirements laid out by the respective authoritative body.
In Argentina and Brazil, food additives are regulated under Mercosur standards (GMC 11/06, 34/10 and 35/10). For new food additives, applicants must submit to the Comisión Nacional de Alimentos (CONAL) or Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitaria (ANVISA) (for Argentina and Brazil, respectively), which will subsequently forward the application to Mercosur's Sub Work Group #3. In Canada, all new food additives or changes to the permitted uses of already approved food additives under Division 16 of the Food and Drug Regulations must undergo a pre-market assessment focused on safety. Similarly, in Japan and China a safety assessment was conducted on all currently permitted food additives. In all the target countries, a pre-market application is generally required for new food additives and for changes pertaining to an existing permitted food additive (such as changing the maximum permitted level, revision of a standard of use, etc.).
In the EU, on 16 December 2008, new regulations were adopted, which include food additives (1333/2008/EC), food enzymes (1332/2008/EC), and flavourings and food ingredients with flavouring properties (1334/2008/EC). The regulation on food additives applies to food additives used for a technological purpose in the manufacture, processing, preparation, treatment, packaging, transport or storage of food, excluding those substances used as processing aids. Under the regulation, food additives shall be subject to safety evaluation by the EFSA and approval via a Community list. The inclusion of a food additive in the Community list is considered by the Commission on the basis of the opinion on its safety from EFSA and a demonstrated case of need. The Commission takes into account other general criteria such as technological need and consumer aspects when considering whether to include the food additive in the Community list. For every food additive included in the positive list, specifications, including the criteria on purity and the origin of the food additive, shall be laid down. In order to increase consistency in common areas of the procedural aspects of food additives’ approval, guidelines for evaluation by EFSA and decision-making by the Commission, are provided in Regulation (EC) No. 1331/2008 (adopted 16 December 2010) which establishes a common authorisation procedure for food additives, food enzymes and food flavourings. In June 2012, new guidance for the submission of food additive applications was published outlining a tiered approach, in which the extent of toxicological testing is determined by the results of initial testing, with key issues and triggers described that can result in additional required testing (EFSA Panel 2012).
In the US, substances to be added to food are subject to a premarket approval requirement unless they are exempt as outlined below. Rulis and Levitt (2009) provide an excellent detailed description of the food additive approval process in the US. The 1958 Food Additive Amendments of the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA) required demonstration of the safety of food additives, but also included two clauses to exempt food additives currently in use from safety assessments by making them “grandfathered” ingredients. This included food additives that had been previously sanctioned for use in foods, and food additives that were “generally recognised as safe” (GRAS) for use as food. These ingredients became known as GRAS substances and were permitted to remain on the market, although in later years subsequent reviews of the safety of many of the grandfathered GRAS substances were undertaken and the USFDA affirmed their GRAS status. In 1997, the USFDA issued a proposed rule to eliminate the GRAS affirmation petition process and replace it with a voluntary notification procedure. Thus, the USFDA no longer accepts GRAS affirmation petitions. Additional details on the history of GRAS is available on the USFDA website.
As a result of these amendments to the FFDCA, a food additive pre-market approval is not required for a new food additive or use if the use is GRAS. The use of the substance can be determined to be GRAS by experts qualified by scientific training and experience to evaluate its safety, and having been adequately shown through scientific procedures (or in the case of a substance used in food prior to 1 January 1958, through either scientific procedures or experience based on common use in food) to be safe under the conditions of intended use. The requirement for “general recognition” of safety is often satisfied through publication of the pivotal safety data in the peer-reviewed literature, and cited in the GRAS dossier or notification submission. A list of GRAS substance notifications reviewed by the USFDA and the agency response can be found in an online database maintained by the agency. In general, the USFDA's response is one of the following: (1) the USFDA has no questions about the notifier's conclusion of GRAS status; (2) the notice does not provide a basis for a conclusion of GRAS status; or (3) at the notifier's request, the USFDA ceased to evaluate the notice.
Several important points about GRAS substances should be noted. Firstly, the GRAS status of a compound is based on the intended use(s) and levels of use documented in the determination dossier, which will determine the anticipated exposure and thus safety. Thus, it is the specific use, and not the substance in general, that is determined to be GRAS. Other uses of that substance in foods are not GRAS. Secondly, as USFDA notification of the GRAS determination is voluntary, there is no publicly available list of the uses of substances that have been “self-determined” to be GRAS and thus no opportunity for public scrutiny of safety decisions. A recent review by Neltner et al. (2011) provides further discussion of the US food additive regulatory programme. For a summary of the regulations pertaining to direct food additives, see Table 12.
Table 12.
Argentina | Australia/New Zealand | Brazil | Canada | China | European Union | Japan | Mexico | USA | |
Definition of a food additive includes: | Any ingredient added to foods intentionally, without intent to nurture, in order to modify the physical, chemical, biological or sensorycharacteristics of foods, during its manufacture, processing, preparation, processing, packaging, conditioning, storage, transport or during food handling: it will have, or it can be reasonably expected to have (directly or indirectly) as a result, the additive itself or its by-products become part of that food | Any substance not normally consumed as a food in itself and not normally used as an ingredient of food, but which is intentionally added to a food to achieve one or more of the technological functions specified in Schedule 5. It or its by-products may remain in the food | Same as for Argentinaa | Any substance the use of which results, or may reasonably be expected to result, in it or its by-products becoming a part of or affecting the characteristics of a food. It should be noted that a substance not present in the final food but which has affected the characteristics of that food would be regulated as a food additive | An artificially chemosynthetic or natural substance to be added to foods in order to improve food quality, colour, fragrance and taste, and for the purpose of preservation and processing technology. Nutrition enhancers, gum-based substances in chewing gum, flavouring agents, and processing aids in the food industry are also included in food additives | Substances that are not normally consumed as food itself but are added to food intentionally for a technological purpose. Preparations obtained from foods and other natural source material that are intended to have a technological effect in the final food and which are obtained by selective extraction of constituents relative to the nutritive or aromatic constituents, should be considered additives | Substances used in or on food in the process of manufacturing food, or substances used for the purpose of processing or preserving food. Consequently, an “additive” includes both substances remaining in the finished food products, such as food colours and preservatives, and substances not remaining in the finished products, such as infiltration-supporting agents | Substances added directly to food and non-alcoholic beverages during its manufacture in order to provide or intensify aroma, colour or flavour, to improve its stability or its preservation. Additives always perform a technological function in the final product | Substances that may become a component or otherwise affect the characteristics of food and which do not fit into any other category. Subcategories include direct food additives which are intentionally added directly to food and “Secondary direct additives” which may more commonly be known as processing aids |
Definition of a food additive does not include: | Contaminants or nutrients that are incorporated into a food in order to maintain or improve its nutritional properties | Same as for Argentinaa | Any nutritive material used, recognised or commonly sold as an article or ingredient of food; vitamins, mineral nutrients and amino acids, other than those listed in Division 16; spices, seasonings, flavouring preparations, essential oils, oleoresins and natural extractives; agricultural chemicals, other than those listed in Division 16, food packaging materials and components thereof; and drugs for administration to animals that may be food | Substances used for the purpose of imparting flavour and/or taste or for nutritional purposes. Substances considered as foods which may be used for a technological function, such as sodium chloride or saffron for colouring, and food enzymes | Contaminants, substances added to foods to maintain or to improve the nutritional quality, or sodium chloride | Contaminants or substances that are not intended to be added directly to food or have a technical effect, but which may reasonably be expected to become a component of food | |||
Regulation | Mercosur regulations, GMC 11/06, GMC 34/10, and GMC 35/10 | Food additives may only be added to food where expressly permitted in Food Standard 1.3.1 | Same as for Argentina” | Division B.16 | Order No. 73: Measures for Administration of New Food Additives | 1333/2008/EC | Food Sanitation Law | Regulation on Sanitary Control of Products and Services | 21 CFR §§70–82, and §§170–189. Proposed rule published in 1997 (62 FR 18938) |
Additional regulation details | Permitted list of food additives according to GMC 11/06. Food additives used according to GMP (GMC 34/10). Food additives used according to maximum levels (GMC 35/10) | Additives can only be added to food in order to achieve an identified technological function according to GMP. Some additives have specificpermissions and maximum use levels allowed in food and other additives are limited to GMP. Specificflavouring agents, sweeteners, and colouring agents are regulated as food additives | Same as for Argentinaa | Permitted list of food additives | Permitted list of food additives | Community list of food additives 129/2011 and 1130/2011 | Approved food additives list containing 411 additives (under Article 10 of Food Sanitation Law) | Permitted list of food additives | |
Approval process | Pre-market application is required. Submission to CONAL, who will forward petition to Mercosur's Sub Work Group #3 | Pre-market application is required | Pre-market application is required. Submission to ANVISA, which will forward petition to Mercosur's Sub Work Group #3 | Pre-market application is required for a new substances, for an extension of the use of a permitted food additive, changing the maximum level of a permitted food additive, or adding a new organism to the list of permitted sources of enzymes used as a food additive | Pre-market application is required for new food additives; a new food additive is an additive that is not included in the national food safety standards, not included in the publicannouncement of permitted use issued by the MOH, and whose scope of use or dosage is increased | Pre-market application is required (new common authorisation procedure under Regulation (EC) No. 1331/2008. Details found in Regulation (EU) 234/2011 that implements Regulation (EC) No. 1331/2008 and in Practical Guidance for Applicants. New additives, or seeking to revise existing provisions regulating individual additives already authorised, or seekingconfirmation that an approved additive made from a new source or method is acceptable, must submit an application | Pre-market application is required for a new substance intended to be used as a food additive and for applying for revision of standards for use of a food additive | Pre-market application is required | Pre-market application in the form of a food or colour additive petition. Exempt from food additive petition if prior sanctioned or use determined to be GRAS |
Note: aRegulations pertaining to Argentina follow Mercosur Standards. Brazil also follows Mercosur Standards.
Novel foods
Novel foods (which usually encompass novel food ingredients) are generally foods or ingredients without a history of human consumption. Novel foods are specifically defined and regulated among Australia/New Zealand, Brazil, Canada, China and the EU. Although among these countries the definition of a novel food may differ (see definitions in Table 13), all novel foods marketed for sale in these countries require premarket approval or notification to their respective authoritative bodies. The safety assessment for novel foods that are whole foods cannot be conducted in the same manner as is used for individual ingredients. Whole foods are complex mixtures, often with considerable variation in composition depending on growing conditions. As they contribute calories, nutrients and bulk to the diet, they cannot be tested at high levels without altering the nutritional composition of the animal diet, and thus is not possible to achieve the same safety margins between animal dose levels and projected human intakes. Critical components include evaluation of the nutritional composition, presence of known toxins or anti-nutrients, and allergenicity of proteins as well as assessment of the potential nutritional impact of introducing the novel food into the human diet.
Table 13.
Argentina | Australia/New Zealand | Brazil | Canada | China | European Union | Japan | Mexico | USA | |
Definition | No formal definition; however, novel foods are recognised in practice | A non-traditional food with no history of safe use and food requires an assessment of public health and safetyconsiderations. Non-traditional food is defined as a food that does not have a history of humanconsumption in Australia/New Zealand; a substance derived from a food, where that substance does not have a history of human consumption in Australia/New Zealand other than as a component of that food; or any other substance, where that substance, or the source from which it is derived, does not have a history of human consumption as a food in Australia/New Zealand | Foods with no history of use in the country; foods containing novel ingredients, except those listed in Table 1; foods containing substances already consumed that may be added or used at levels much higher than those currently observed in the foods that constitute part of a regular diet; and food offered in the form of capsules, pills, tablets and the like | (1) Substance, including a microorganism, that does not have a history of safe use as a food; (2) a food that has been manufactured, prepared, preserved or packaged by a process that has not been previously applied to that food, and causes the food to undergo a major change; and (3) a food that is derived from a plant, animal or microorganism that has been genetically modified | Novel foods are referred to as new resource foods, which are defined as raw food materials or food ingredients, which do not have a significant history of consumption in China | Novel foods are foods and food ingredients that have not been used for human consumption to a significant degree within the Community before 15 May 1997 | Not defined | Not defined | Not defined |
Regulation | No authoritative statement found | Food Standard 1.5.1. | Resolution No. 16 | Division B.28 | Order No. 56 Administrative Measures on Novel Food | 258/97/EC | No authoritative statement found | Noauthoritativestatementfound | Regulated as direct food additives or food contact substances depending on use |
Additional regulation details | This standard prohibits the sale of these foods unless they are listed in Food Standard 1.5.1 and comply with any special conditions of use | This provision prohibits the sale of these foods unless the manufacturer or importer of the novel food (1) has notified the Director in writing of their intention to sell or advertise for sale the novel food (which includes providing data to support the safety of the novel food); and (2) has received a written notice from the Director (called a Letter of No Objection) | Foods commercialised in at least one member state before the entry into force of the Regulation on Novel Foods on 15 May 1997 are on the EU market under the “principle of mutual recognition” | ||||||
Approval process | Requests for modification to follow guidance document GMC 26/03. If the product requested is considered a novel food in Europe its inclusion will be delayed until the novel foods chapter is written, approved and incorporated to the CAA | Pre-market application is required. FSANZ is reviewing the regulation of novel foods and nutritive substances. Criteria for “eligible foods” (i.e. foods in the wider sense including ingredients, additives and other substances added to food) is proposed. Any non-eligible foods would beprohibited and will require an appropriate safety assessment | Pre-market application is required | Pre-market application is required (safety assessment) | Pre-market application is required | Pre-market application is required (safety assessment) | Noauthoritativestatementfound | Noauthoritativestatementfound | Regulated as direct food additives or food contact substances depending on use |
The majority of these target countries regulate novel foods and novel food ingredients based on a risk or safety assessment model to ensure safety following human consumption as outlined within the applicable regulations. In Argentina, Japan and Mexico, novel foods are neither defined nor regulated. In the US, novel foods are not defined but are regulated as direct food additives or food contact substances depending on their use (see “Direct food additives” above or “Food contact substances” below). For a summary of the regulations pertaining to novel foods, see Table 13.
Food contact substances
Food contact substances are generally any materials or articles intended to come into contact with food, including food containers, packaging, processing, etc. The basic safety principle of food contact materials is that they should generally be inert and not result in addition of compounds to the foods. Thus, the potential for migration of components of food contact materials into foods, and the assessment of exposure and toxicity of any migration is the basis for the safety determinations. In Argentina and Brazil, food contact substances are defined and regulated as food additives as per Mercosur standard GMC 32/07. In Canada and Japan, food contact substances are regulated separately from food additives and approval for use of food contact substances is not required (i.e. only voluntary submission of the food contact substance to the authoritative body).
In Australia/New Zealand, food contact substances are defined as any materials in contact with food and provided that such articles or materials, if taken into the mouth, are not capable of being swallowed or of obstructing any alimentary or respiratory passage and are not otherwise likely to cause bodily harm, distress or discomfort. Plastic materials for food contact use may voluntarily comply with the Australian Standard AS 2070-1999, a positive list of food contact substances. Discussions are in progress to include food packaging in the Food Standard Code, which would require compliance with US or EU regulations. At present, applications for food packaging materials are generally unnecessary provided there is approval in the US or the EU.
In contrast, pre-market notification or approval is required for use of food contact substances in China and the EU to confirm safety. In China, food contact substances are defined as materials in contact with the food, which include the food containers, packaging materials and anything in contact with the food in the course of manufacture, transport, sale and service. The EU has a more extensive definition for food contact substances (i.e. substances used to create all materials and articles intended to come into contact with foodstuffs, including packaging materials but also cutlery, dishes, processing machines, containers, etc.). The term also includes materials and articles that are in contact with water intended for human consumption.
In Mexico, food contact substances are not defined and no specific regulations are available pertaining to their use. The Regulation for the Sanitary Control of Products and Services establishes that packaging materials that contain substances that can migrate to the finished product, without endangering the health of consumers will be considered indirect additives. The classification of packaging materials and the physical, chemical and toxicological characteristic of each type of material will be established in specific norms. In general, the substances that are used to line packages used for foods, non-alcoholic beverages, alcoholic beverages, and health and beauty products will have to: remain perfectly adhered to the surface that is covered and do not crack, flake or become in any way a component of the food; be insoluble or inert in the food matrix, not be toxic; remain totally exempt of the volatile compounds that are used for their dilution and application; be free of heavy metals; avoid metal corrosion and not alter the pH of the product. Most major customers will require legal confirmation that a specific compound is allowed for use and should seek technical consultation. For certain products, a voluntary standard (Mexican Norm – NMX) may be available.
In the US, food contact substances are specifically defined and are also known as indirect additives. They include substances that are not intended to be added directly to food or to have a technical effect, but which may reasonably be expected to become a component of food. These include substances used in packaging, transporting or the production of food.
Premarket approval is required for all food contact substance uses, unless exempted. A substance used in a food contact article may be exempted if the use in question has been shown to meet the requirements for a Threshold of Regulation exemption. The Threshold of Regulation is an application of the concept of the Threshold of Toxicological Concern (TTC). The TTC will be discussed in greater detail in the section on flavouring agents.
In 1995, the USFDA established a “threshold of regulation” of 0.5 ppb (equivalent to 1.5 μg/person/day) for indirect food additives that are not known to be carcinogens and do not contain structural alerts indicative of carcinogenicity (FDA 1995). A list the exemptions that have been issued under 21 CFR 170.39 Threshold of regulation for substances used in food-contact articles, is published on the USFDA website. Food contact substances uses that have been determined to be GRAS as also exempt from premarket approval. Similar to food additives, USFDA notification of the GRAS determination of the use of the food contact substances is voluntary.
In 1997, a food contact notification (FCN) process was established to allows for faster review of food contact substance uses that are not exempt from premarket approval. Unlike food additive regulations and threshold of regulation exemptions, approvals under the FCN process are proprietary and effective only for the manufacturer and substance identified in the notification.
An online inventory of effective premarket notifications for food contact substances that have been demonstrated to be safe for their intended use is maintained by the USFDA.
For a summary of the regulations pertaining to food contact substances, see Table 14.
Table 14.
Argentina | Australia/New Zealand | Brazil | Canada | China | European Union | Japan | Mexico | USA | |
Definition | Primary container or primary wrapping or container. Container that is in directcontact with food | Any materials in contact with food, including packaging material, which may include materials such as moisture absorbers, mould inhibitors, oxygen absorbers, promotional materials, writing or other graphics | Same as for Argentinaa | Anything in which any food is wholly or partially contained, placed or packed | All materials in contact with the food including the food containers, packaging materials and the things which contact the food in the course of manufacture, transport, sale and serve | Food contact materials and articles are those which in their finished state are intended to be brought into contact with food, or are already brought into contact with food and intended for that purpose or can reasonably be expected to be brought into contact with food or to transfer their constituents to food under normal and foreseeable conditions of use. Includes packaging materials cutlery, dishes, processing machines, containers, etc. The term also includes materials and articles in contact with water intended for human consumption. Fixed water installations are excluded, however | Not defined | Not defined | Any substance intended for use as a component of materials used in manufacturing, packing, packaging, transporting or holding food if such use is not intended to have a technical effect in such food |
Regulation | Mercosur GMC 32/07 | Food Standard 1.4.1 and 1.4.3 | Same as for Argentinaa | Division 23, Part B | Hygienic Standards for Additives Used in Food Containers and Packaging Materials (GB 9685) | 1935/2004/EC. This is the framework Regulation with general provisions for all FCM | No authoritative statement found | No authoritative statement found | General: 21 CFR §170–171. Existing indirect additive approvals: 21 CFR §§174–178 and 186. FCS notification regulation: 21 CFR 170.3(e)(3). FCS Threshold of regulation: 21 CFR 170.39. Proposed rule published in 1997 (62 FR 18938) for GRAS determinations |
Additional regulation details | There is a positive list of substances that are added to plastics to achieve a technical effect in the final product | Food contact substances may be placed in contact with food, provided such articles or materials, if taken into the mouth, are not capable of being swallowed or of obstructing any alimentary or respiratory passage and are not otherwise likely to cause bodily harm, distress or discomfort | Same as for Argentinaa | (EU) 10/2011 is the specific Regulation for plastic FCM with a positive list of substances. (EC) 450/2009 is the specific Regulation for A&I FCM. Regulation (EC) 282/2008 is specific for Recycling of plastics. Directive 2007/42/EC is specific for Regenerate cellulose film. Directive 84/500/EEC is specific for ceramics. For all those materials for which no specific measure is adopted at the EU level, national legislation in member states may exist | |||||
Approval process | Same process as direct food additives | Applications for food packaging materials are generallyunnecessary if there is approval in the EU or US. Plastic materials for food contact use may comply with the voluntary Australian Standard AS 2070-1999 | Same as for Argentinaa | Voluntary submission to the Health Products and Food Branch (HPFB) for a pre-market assessment of their chemical safety | Pre-market application is required | Pre-market application is required only for substances for which a positive listing is not set out specifically. Regulation at the EU includes plastics, A&I FCM and Regenerated cellulose film. For the other materials the general provisions of the framework Regulation 1935/2004 apply and specific measures may exist at the national level | JHOSPA established the industry's voluntary standards composed of a positive list of raw materials that can be used safely for food utensils, containers, packaging materials, and Standard Methods of Analysis with specifications for each resin | Although no specific process, most major customers require legal confirmation that the compound is allowed. Any approval should be obtained through technical consultation | Pre-market request for review in the form of a food contact notification, a threshold of regulation exemption request, or a GRAS determination. Notification to the USFDA of GRAS determinations is voluntary. The USFDA review of GRAS notifications is not considered a formal approval |
Notes: aRegulations pertaining to Argentina follow Mercosur Standards. Brazil also follows Mercosur Standards.
JHOSOA, Jopan Hygienic Orefin and Styrene Plastics Association.
Flavouring agents
Flavouring agents are substances or mixtures of substances intended for use in flavouring, intensifying or enhancing the aroma or taste of a food. Due to the very large number of flavouring agents and their use at very low levels in foods, regulations pertaining to this category represent a unique approach in many cases. Many flavouring agents have been approved based on long history of safe use (i.e. grandfathered) or through use of the TTC approach. The history, assumptions and databases used to develop the TTC were recently reviewed and evaluated by the EFSA Scientific Committee (2012) for consideration of potential application of the TTC to the safety assessment of other categories substances of present in foods and feed. In brief, the TTC is based on the concept that reasonable assurance of safety can be given, even in the absence of chemical-specific toxicity data, providing that the intake is sufficiently low, i.e. that an exposure level or threshold can be defined below which there is no significant risk to human health. The TTC requires that the chemical structure of the compound is known, and there is adequate information on the likely human exposure. Human threshold values or TTC values have been determined for structural classes of compounds using probabilistic approaches based on databases of toxicological testing for both cancer and non-cancer endpoints on a wide variety of chemical structures (EFSA 2012).
Flavouring agents, similar to food contact substances, do not require pre-market notification prior to use in Canada or the US. In the US, flavouring agents can be approved by the USFDA through a petition or though the GRAS determination process. The Flavor and Extract Manufacturers Association (FEMA) expert panel has served as the primary body for the safety evaluation of food flavourings since 1959, through GRAS assessment of flavouring substances, which often utilises the TTC approach. The panel safety decisions are provided to the USFDA and are published in the peer-reviewed literature (Smith et al. 2011) as well as on the FEMA webpage. As discussed below, the conclusions of the FEMA Expert Panel are often used as the basis for the acceptance of flavouring substances as safe food ingredients in many countries around the world.
In Australia/New Zealand, China, the EU, Japan and Mexico flavouring substances fall under the regulations for food additives. The permitted list of food additives generally includes specific flavouring substances. For a new flavouring substance (substance not listed on the permitted list of food additives for use), the approval process follows the same process as a food additive (see “Direct food additives” above). In Australia/New Zealand, FSANZ does not require a risk assessment to be done if the flavours are already listed in various publications such as the GRAS list published by the FEMA (Smith et al. 2011).
Recently in the EU, a new regulation was issued for flavouring substances under Regulation (EC) No. 1334/2008 and a new authorisation procedure under Regulation (EC) No. 1331/2008 was adopted (as discussed above in “Direct food additives”). EFSA and the JECFA also, when possible and feasible, apply the TTC approach for assessment of flavour substance.
In Argentina and Brazil, flavouring agents are regulated under Mercosur standards GMC 10/06. For new flavouring agents, applicants must submit to CONAL or ANVISA (for Argentina and Brazil, respectively), who will forward the application to Mercosur's Sub Work Group #3. For a summary of the regulations pertaining to flavouring agents, see Table 15.
Table 15.
Country | Argentina | Australia/New Zealand | Brazil | Canada | China | European Union | Japan | Mexico | USA |
Definition | Substances or mixtures of substances with odoriferous and/or flavour properties that are able to confer or enhance the aroma and/or taste of food | Flavourings are defined as intense preparations that are added to foods to impart taste and/or odour, which are used in small amounts and are not intended to be consumed alone, but do not include herbs, spices and substances which have an exclusively sweet, sour or salt taste | Same as for Argentina” | Not defined; however, there are standards of identity and composition for certain flavouring preparations in Division B.10 | Food additive and food ingredient necessary for producing, preserving and applying the flavourings. The additive added to food (except flavour enhancer) does not play the role for final aromatic products | Flavourings are products that are not intended to be consumed as such, but which are added to food in order to impart or modify odour and/or taste of food. Flavouring substances are chemically defined substances obtained by chemical synthesis or isolated using chemical processes, and natural flavouring substances | Natural flavouring agents are defined as food additives intended for use in flavouring food and are substances obtained from animals or plants, or mixtures thereof | Substance or blend of substances of natural origin, identical to natural or synthetic with or without solvents and with or without the addition of other additives that are used to give or intensify flavours or aromas to products | Not defined; regulated as substances added directly to food, specifically as direct food additives and GRAS substances |
Regulation | Mercosur GMC 10/06 | Food Standard 1.3.1 Section 11. FSANZ does not require a risk assessment to be done if the flavours are GRAS by FEMA or others | Same as for Argentina” | Division B.10 | National Standard of the People's Republic of China Flavourings (TBT/N/CHN/575) | 1334/2008/EC (framework Regulation 2065/2003/EC (smoke flavourings) | Food Sanitation Law | Regulated as food additives | Labelling of flavours: 21 CFR §101.22. Lists of flavours approved in the regulations: 21 CFR §§172, 182 and 184. Proposed rule published in 1997 (62 FR 18938) |
Additional regulation details | Permitted list of flavouring substances (natural or synthetic) | Same as for Argentinaa | Certain prohibitions exist in Section B.01.046. Definition of food additive excludes flavouring preparations | ||||||
Approval process | Application submission to CONAL and subsequent submission to Mercosur | Flavouring agents are regarded as food additives. An application is generally not required for a flavouring agent | Application submission to ANVISA and subsequent submission to Mercosur | Voluntary request a letter of opinion on a flavouring agent (see “approval process for processing aids”) | Same process as direct food additives | New common authorisation procedure under Regulation (EC) No. 1331/2008, data requirements provided in Regulation (EC) No. 234/2011. For smoke flavourings Regulation (EC) 2065/2003 specifies the procedure | Same process as direct food additives | Same process as direct food additives | Same process as substances added directly to food. See “direct food additives” above. Most flavouring agents in the US are reviewed by the Flavor and Extract Manufacturers Association (FEMA) expert panel to determine if their uses are GRAS |
Note: aRegulations pertaining to Argentina follow Mercosur Standards. Brazil also follows Mercosur Standards.
Enzymes
In general, enzymes are substances or products extracted from animals, plants or microbes that act by either promoting a desirable chemical reaction or are used in processing. The definition of an enzyme according to each target country is presented in Table 17. In Canada, China, the EU, Japan, Mexico and the US enzymes are regulated as food additives. Likewise, the approval process for new enzymes also follows the same approval process for direct food additives (see “Direct food additives” above). However, depending on the context of use, Canada may consider enzymes to be processing aids. In Australia/New Zealand, enzymes as such are not specifically defined in the Food Standards Code; however, specified enzymes are permitted for use as processing aids (see “Processing aids” below). Recently in the EU, a new regulation was issued for enzymes under Regulation (EC) No. 1332/2008 and a new authorisation procedure under Regulation (EC) No. 1331/2008 was adopted (as discussed above). In Argentina and Brazil, enzyme regulations are not harmonised in Mercosur; thus, enzyme regulations are regulated differently for these two countries. In Argentina, enzymes are regulated under the CAA, Chapter XVI (Articles 1261, 1262 and 1263). The approval processes for new enzymes require an application submitted to CONAL. In Brazil, enzymes are regulated under Resolution No. 26 and the use of new enzymes requires an application submitted to ANVISA.
Table 17.
Argentina | Australia/New Zealand | Brazil | Canada | China | European Union | Japan | Mexico | USA | |
Definition | Any substance, excluding equipment and utensils that is not consumed by itself as a food ingredient and which is intentionally used in the processing of raw materials, foods or ingredients, for a technological purpose during treatment or processing. It must be removed from the food or inactivated; the presence of traces of the substances or their derivatives may be admitted in the final product | Substances used in the processing of raw materials, foods or ingredients to fulfil a technological purpose relating to treatment or processing but does not perform a technological function in the final food; and the substance is used in the course of manufacture of a food at the lowest level necessary to achieve a function in the processing of that food, irrespective of any maximum permitted level specified | Same as for Argentina | Substance used for a technical effect in food processing or manufacture, the use of which does not affect the intrinsic characteristics of the food and results in no or negligible residues of the substance or its by-products in or on the finished food | Substance or material (not including apparatus or utensils), and not consumed as a food ingredient by itself, and only used to fulfil a certain technological purpose during processing or treatment | Any substance that is not consumed as a food by itself; is intentionally used in the processing of raw materials, foods or their ingredients to fulfil a certain technological purpose during treatment or processing; and may result in the unintentional but technically unavoidable presence in the final product of residues of the substance or its derivatives provided they do not present any health risk and do not have any technological effect on the final product | Substances added during processing food which are: (1) removed from food before completion of the food; (2) derived from raw materials of food and converted into components normally included in food but do not significantly increase the amounts of components; or (3) present in the finished food at insignificant levels but do not have any technical or functional effect of these components on the food | Substance or material, excluding instruments, utensils and additives, that is not consumed as a food ingredient by itself and is used intentionally in the production of raw materials, foods or their ingredients to achieve a technological function during the treatment or processing and that can lead to the unintentional presence of residues or derivatives in the final product | Substances that have a technical effect in food during processing but that are not intended to have an ongoing technical effect in the food |
Regulation | Processing aids are not harmonised in Mercosur, the only harmonised regulation is GMC 84/93 which establishes the definitions of the functions of processing aids. Certain processing aids are listed under Chapter XVI of the CAA, but this list is not comprehensive | Food Standard 1.3.3, a general standard for processing aids | Processing aids are notharmonised in Mercosur, the onlyharmonised regulation is GMC 84/93 whichestablishes the definitions of the functions of processing aids | No specific regulations on most processing aids. If a substance does not meet the specific criteria for the definition of a processing aid as outlined above, it may be considered to be a food additive and the regulations pertaining to food additives would be applicable | Processing aids are regulated as food additives | Processing aids are not regulated at the EU level, with the exception of extraction solvents used in the production of foodstuffs and food ingredients (Directive 2009/32/EC). If a substance does not meet the criteria for the definition of a processing aid, as outlined in the definition above, it can be considered as a food additive and Regulation (EC) No. 1333/2008 would be applicable | Processing aids are regulated as food additives | Processing aids are regulated as food additives | Regulated as food additives or in some cases as food contact substances. When approved in theregulations, they are known as “secondary direct additives” |
Approval process | Application submission to CONAL | Pre-market application is required | Application submission to ANVISA | May seek a so-called “Letter of Opinion” which confirms that, under its conditions of use, the substance is considered a processing aid and use is acceptable | Same process as direct food additives | As they fall out of the scope of EU legislation, there is no process for their approval. Nevertheless, member states or the COM may address the issue of their safety to EFSA | Same process as direct food additives | Same process as direct food additives | Same process as substances added directly to food except where the USFDA may consider them to be food contact substances. See “direct food additives” and “food contact substances” above |
JECFA (2001) has also provided specific comments for consideration of the safety assessment of enzymes derived from recombinant sources. These include: (1) characterisation of genetic materials introduced into the organism producing the enzyme to demonstrate that no unexpected genetic materials are introduced into the host; (2) consideration of potential of proteins from the microorganism leading to antibiotic resistance; and (3) evaluation of the allergenic potential of the gene products.
For a summary of the regulations pertaining to enzymes, see Table 16.
Table 16.
Argentina | Australia/New Zealand | Brazil | Canada | China | European Union | Japan | Mexico | USA | |
Definition | Enzymes or enzymepreparations are substances of animal, plant or microbial origin that act by promoting the desirable chemical reactions | Not specifically defined in the Food Standards Code | Enzymes or enzyme preparations are substances of animal, plant or microbial origin that act by promoting the desirable chemical reactions | Not specifically defined in the Food and Drug Regulations | Biological products directly extracted from edible or non-edible parts of a plant or animal or fermented and extracted from traditional or genetically modified microorganisms (including but not limited to bacteria, actinomycetes, and fungi) that are used in food processing and have a special catalytic function | A food enzyme is defined as a product obtained from plants, animals or microorganisms, or products thereof including a product obtained by a fermentation process using amicroorganism containing one or more enzymes capable of catalysing a specificbiochemical reaction and added to food for a technological purpose at any stage of the manufacturing, processing, preparation, treatment, packaging, transport or storage of foods | Not defined | Biological catalyser protein substance produced by live cells that catalyse specific reactions in diverse production processes | Not defined |
Regulation | CAA, Chapter XVI, Articles 1261, 1262 and 1263. Enzymes regulations are not harmonised in Mercosur | Enzymes may be used in the course of manufacture of any food, provided the enzyme is derived from the corresponding source or sources specified in the tables of Sections 15–17 of Food Standard 1.3.3 (standard for processing aids) | Resolução RDC # 26 dated 27 May 2009 (on the ANVISA site). Enzymes regulations are not harmonised in Mercosur | Enzymes are regulated as food additives or may be considered processing aids depending on their context of use | Enzymes are regulated as food additives | Regulation (EC) No. 1332/2008 (Regulation (EC) No. 1332/2008 does not include food enzymes used in the production of food additives within the scope of Regulation (EC) No. 1333/2008 or processing aids). The scope of this regulation does not extend to enzymes that are not added to food to perform a technological function but are intended for human consumption such as enzymes for nutritional or digestive purposes | Enzymes listed as a permitted food additive can be used in food under the conditions indicated | Enzymes are regulated as food additives | Enzymes are regulated as substances added directly to food, specifically as direct food additives, secondary direct food additives, or GRAS substances |
Approval process | Application submission to CONAL | Same process as processing aids | Application submission to ANVISA | Same process as direct food additives and processing aids | Same process as direct food additives | New common authorisation procedure under Regulation (EC) No. 1331/2008 and Regulation (EC) No. 234/2011 | Same process as direct food additives | Same process as direct food additives | Same process as substances added directly to food. See “direct food additives” above |
Processing aids
The definition of processing aid varies across the target countries; however, in general, processing aids are substances not consumed as food ingredients by themselves and are used intentionally in processing or in the production of raw materials, ingredients or foods to achieve a technological purpose. As illustrated in Codex inventory of processing aids, with the exception of enzymes and solvents, most processing aids have not been evaluated by JECFA. Furthermore, this inventory is not considered to be complete. Development of a comprehensive Codex database of processing aids is under discussion.
In Canada, similar to flavouring agents and food contact substances, processing aids are permitted for use without pre-market notification providing they meet the specific criteria for the definition of a processing aid (i.e. results in no or negligible residues in the food). If they do not meet these criteria, the processing aid is considered to be a food additive and the approval process for direct food additives would be applicable. Similarly in the EU, no regulations pertain to processing aids specifically; however, if a processing aid does not meet the criteria for the definition of a processing aid, it is classified as a food additive, and Regulation (EC) No. 1333/2008 (regulation for food additives) would be applicable. Processing aids are regulated as food additives forthe following countries: China, Japan and Mexico; therefore, all regulations pertaining to direct food additives are applicable (see “Direct food additives” above). In Mexico, publication in 2012 of the new updated food additive positive lists processing aids separate from food additives. In Argentina and Brazil, processing aids are not harmonised in Mercosur. The only harmonised regulation is 84/93, which establishes the definitions of the functions of processing aids. In Argentina, certain processing aids are listed under Chapter XVI of the CAA; however, this list is not comprehensive. In Australia/New Zealand, processing aids are regulated under Food Standard 1.3.3, a general standard for processing aids. New processing aids or existing processing aids with new food uses require an application to modify the Standard Food Code. It should be noted that processing aids are regulated into a specific horizontal standard (i.e. across the whole food supply) in Australia, unlike the systems used by other countries, as well as for standards promulgated by the CAC. In the US, processing aids would be known as “secondary direct food additives” and regulated as direct food additives. In some cases, they may also be regulated as food contact substances (see “Direct food additives” and “Food contact substances” above).
For a summary of the regulations pertaining to processing aids, see Table 17.
Nanoscale materials
The regulation of products of nanotechnology is a dynamic and evolving activity, due largely to the wide spectrum of nanomaterials, nano-enabled products, and applications that are being developed and the uncertainties that are associated with defining, characterising, and appropriately testing them for efficacy and safety (PEN 2011). Nanotechnology is a term that has been defined in a few countries (Australia/New Zealand, Canada, China and the EU), but not all. In Canada, nanotechnology is described as the application of nanoscience to develop new materials and products, and involves the manipulation of matter at the nanometre scale. The development of the definition of nanomaterials has begun in several countries, including Canada, the EU and the US. For example, the European Commission (EC) proposed definition was “amaterial that consists of particles with one or more external dimensions in the size range 1–100 nm for more than 1% of their number”; and/or “has internal or surface structures in one or more dimensions in the size range 1 nm–100 nm”;and/or “has a specific surface area by volume greater than 60 m2 cm−−3, excluding materials consisting of particles with a size lower than 1 nm”.
The development of engineered nanomaterials with new beneficial properties has potential food applications including improved nutrient and bioactive delivery systems, improved texture and flavour encapsulation; improved microbiological control, food processing, packaging, and package biodegradability; and highly sensitive biosensors for detecting pathogens, allergens, contaminants and degradants (reviewed in Chaudhry et al. 2008; Augustin & Sanguansri 2009; Magnuson et al. 2011). The regulation of use of engineered nanomaterials in food and feed production represents many new challenges. However, it should be noted that nanomaterials and nanostructures also occur naturally in all plant and animal products that are consumed as food. Examples of naturally occurring nanomaterials include DNA molecules and proteins such as casein micelles and whey proteins. Examples of nanostructures include the muscle structure of meats and fish, and pectin nanostructure in fruits.
The challenges regarding safety assessment of engineered nanomaterials that may be present in foods were discussed in a FAO/WHO Expert meeting on the application of nanotechnologies in the food and agriculture sectors (FAO/WHO 2010). As numerous studies have demonstrated that the biological properties of materials can change substantially when reduced to the nano-size range, the toxicological properties of nanomaterials cannot be assumed to be the same as their non-nano counterparts. A critical review of the published literature on the toxicity of nanomaterials with potential use or occurrence in food, food-related materials or dietary supplements demonstrated that there are very few published studies with adequate characterisation and repeated-dose exposures, which are necessary to assess safety of food-related exposures (Card et al. 2011). Thus, considerable additional research is needed to understand the potential effects of oral exposure to engineered nanomaterials. The FAO/WHO Expert meeting report also discussed gaps in knowledge and a need for sharing of existing data on the characterisation, toxicological and exposure data as well as appropriate methodologies to facilitate risk assessment (FAO/WHO 2010).
Currently, none of the listed “target countries” has established specific regulations on nanoscale materials for food-related uses; however, several have issued comments or opinions which are briefly discussed below. Many of the countries are involved in international organisations working toward developing approaches to risk assessment of nanomaterials. For further details, see the summary tables (Tables 1–9) for each target country.
Australia and New Zealand
In Australia and New Zealand, any new substances intended to be added to food that are manufactured using nanotechnologies that may present safety concerns will have to undergo a comprehensive scientific safety assessment under the appropriate standard (e.g. as a novel food or food additive) before they can be legally sold in those countries. FSANZ has developed a factsheet for nanotechnology and foods, outlining the presence of naturally occurring nanomaterials in foods and the environment (FSANZ 2011b).
Canada
Health Canada is using existing legislative and regulatory frameworks to regulate applications of nanotechnology but recognises that new approaches may be necessary in future to keep pace with the advances in this area, particularly given that there currently is inadequate information on risks associated with nanomaterials (Health Canada 2010). Various acts (and regulations contained therein) are envisioned by Health Canada to be relevant to nanomaterials, including the Food and Drugs Act, the Canadian Environmental Protection Act 1999, the Hazardous Products Act, and the Pest Control Products Act.
Health Canada has indicated that in order to identify and assess potential risks and benefits (where applicable) of nanomaterials, the following types of information may be required to be submitted for review:
Intended use of the nanomaterial, including any end product in which it will be used.
Characterisation of the nanomaterial, including manufacturing methods, identity and purity.
Physicochemical properties and toxicological, eco-toxicological, metabolism and environmental fate data that may be both generic and specific to the nanomaterial if applicable.
Risk assessment and risk management strategies, if considered or implemented.
Health Canada has noted that future guidance specificto different programme areas and legislative and regulatory authorities will be developed in a manner that promotes a consistent set of approaches (Health Canada 2010).
European Union
Although there are no specific provisions in the EU legislation on nanoscale materials, existing legislation covers in principle the potential health, safety and environmental risks in relation to nanomaterials. A close examination of the definition for food additives already incorporates nanoscale materials (i.e. food additives that are prepared through nanotechnology would be considered under novel foods). In Article 12 of 1333/2008/EC:
when a food additive is already included in a Community list and there is a significant change in its production methods or in the starting materials used, or there is a change in particle size, for example through nanotechnology, the food additive prepared by those new methods or materials shall be considered as a different additive and a new entry in the Community lists or a change in the specifications shall be required before it can be placed on the market.
EFSA has published guidance for assessing the risks of nanoscience and nanotechnologies in food and feed (EFSA 2011). It stressed the importance of adequate physicochemical characterisation of the forms of engineered nanomaterials in food/feed products and under testing conditions. The physicochemical parameters that should be characterised regardless of the route of exposure include agglomeration and/or aggregation, chemical composition, crystal structure/crystallinity, particle size/size distribution, purity, shape, surface area, surface charge, and surface chemistry including composition and reactivity. The following characteristics are considered to be indicators of increased probability of toxicity: a high level of reactivity (e.g. catalytic, chemical); complex morphology (e.g. long fibre, crystal); interaction with biomolecules (e.g. proteins, DNA); complex transformations (e.g. loss of coating); the presence of antimicrobial activity; and evidence of persistence and/or bioaccumulation (EFSA 2011).
United States of America
The USFDA issued draft guidance in April 2012 regarding nanotechnology. At this time, there is no formal definition for “nanotechnology” or “nanoscale,” however the USFDA indicated that, “In the absence of a formal definition, when considering whether a USFDA-regulated product contains nanomaterials or otherwise involves the application of nanotechnology, the USFDA will ask: (1) whether an engineered material or end product has at least one dimension in the nanoscale range (approximately 1 100 nm); or (2) whether an engineered material or end product exhibits properties or phenomena, including physical or chemical properties or biological effects, that are attributable to its dimension(s), even if these dimensions fall outside the nanoscale range, up to 1 μm”. New substances, whether direct food additives or food contact substances, cannot be GRAS per this draft guidance. Manufacturers seeking approval for a nano-engineered substance must submit a food additive petition or a food contact substance notification.
No specific documents on the regulation of nanomaterials for food-related uses were found for Argentina, Brazil, China, Japan and Mexico, although work is in progress. Argentina, Brazil, China and Japan have established or are participating in various groups for the development of nanotechnology standards in the areas of health, safety and environment. A summary of the developing approaches to risk assessment of nanomaterials among the target countries is listed in Table 18.
Table 18.
Argentina | Australia/New Zealand | Brazil | Canada | China | European Union | Japan | Mexico | USA |
Argentina has established or is participating in various groups for the development of standards in the area of nanomaterials (see nanoscale materials under Table 1 for further details) | Any new food substances manufactured using nanotechnologies that may present safety concerns will have to undergo a comprehensive scientific safety assessment under the appropriate standard before they can be legally sold in those countries (see nanoscale materials under Table 2 for further details) | Brazil has established or is participating in groups for the development of standards in the area of nanomaterials (see nanoscale materials under Table 3 for further details) | Health Canada is using existing legislative and regulatory frameworks to regulate applications of nanotechnology, but it recognises that new approaches may be necessary in future to keep pace with the advances in this area, particularly given that there currently is inadequate information on risks associated with nanomaterials. Various acts (and regulations contained therein) are envisioned by Health Canada to be relevant to nanomaterials. Health Canada has indicated that in order to identify and assess potential risks and benefits (where applicable) of nanomaterials, a list of documents is required). For further details, see nanoscale materials under Table 4. | China has established or is participating in various groups for the development of standards in the area of nanomaterials (see nanoscale materials under Table 5 for further details) | EFSA published an opinion on nanotechnologies and a guidance document on risk assessment was published in May 2011. Existing legislation covers in principle the potential health, safety and environmental risks in relation to nanomaterials. Recently, specific provisions on risk assessment of nanomaterials were introduced in EU legislation on food additives and food contact materials. A definition of “engineered nanomaterial” and a mandatory labelling requirement for food ingredients containing such nanomaterials were introduced. Examination of the definition for food additives already incorporates nanoscale materials (i.e. food additives prepared through nanotechnology would be considered new food additives). EFSA considers the risk assessment paradigm applicable to nanomaterials, but suggests that a risk assessment of nanomaterials in food and feed take into consideration specific properties of nanomaterials in addition to those common to the equivalent non-nanoforms. For further details, see nanoscale materials under Table 6. | Japan has established or is participating in groups for the development of standards in the area of nanomaterials (see nanoscale materials under Table 7 for further details) | No specific documents on the regulation ofnanomaterials for food-related uses were identified | The USFDA issued draft guidance onnanotechnology and food in April 2012. There is no formal definition for “nanotechnology” or “nanoscale” at this time, however the guidance contains considerations the USFDA takes into account when evaluating nanomaterials. New nano-engineered substances, whether direct food additives or food contact substances, cannot be GRAS per the USFDA's recently issued draft guidance. Manufacturers seeking approval for a nano-engineered substance must submit a food additive petition or a food contact substance notification. See “food contact substances” and “food additives” above. For further details see nanoscale materials under Table 9. |
Conclusions
JECFA, whose genesis occurred at the FAO/WHO Conference on Food Additives in 1955, continues to be of fundamental importance to the activities of the CAC and especially to the Codex Committee on Food Additives and the Codex Committee on Contaminants in Foods. While the outcome of JECFA's evaluations does not have any direct bearing on the regulatory approval of a food additive in any specificcountry, JECFA's scientific evaluations and reassessments are widely recognised and may affect an application for approval for a new food additive in a particular country. Similar to JECFA, the CAC has no regulatory authority and its standards are not enforceable unless they have been adopted into the regulatory framework for a nation; however, its standards for food additives continue to serve as guidelines to many nations.
In addition to their guiding international influence, the early work of JECFA and CAC and the principles outlined by those committees laid the foundation for how substances added to food are regulated in many individual countries today, including the countries examined: Argentina, Australia, Brazil, Canada, China, the EU, Japan, Mexico, New Zealand, and the US. The regulatory authority for each target jurisdiction/country utilises its own regulatory framework and although the definitions, regulations and approval processes may vary among all target countries, in general there are many similarities across all target countries. In all cases, the main purpose of each regulatory authority is to establish a framework and maintain/enforce regulations to ensure the safety of food consumed and sold within its respective countries. Although the path for approval of different categories of food additives varies from jurisdiction to jurisdiction, there are many commonalities in terms of the data requirements and considerations for assessment of the safety of use of substances added to food, including the use of positive lists of approved substances, pre-market approval, and a separation between science and policy decisions. There is also a move toward harmonisation of food regulations, as illustrated by Australia and New Zealand, by Mercosur and by the EU. International collaboration is occurring to address the challenge of developing regulatory guidance and safety assessment for use of nanomaterials in foods. Harmonisation of global food regulations is envisioned to promote use of all available foods through free trade, to support farmers, and to reduce hunger and poverty globally.
Acknowledgements
Dr Ian Munro was instrumental in the development of this review, and wrote the description of the history and accomplishments of JECFA. Sadly, he passed away before this work was completed. He is greatly missed. This work was supported by funding from The Pew Charitable Trusts. The authors gratefully acknowledge the following individuals for reviewing the manuscript and providing comments during the preparation of this review: Thomas G. Neltner and Neesha R. Kulkarni with The Pew Charitable Trusts; the International Food Additives Council; Dr Jordi Serratosa and Dr Alexandre Feigenbaum with the European Food Safety Authority; Annette Schaefer and Sirkku Heinimaa with the European Commission; Josée Bouchard, Luc Bourbonnière, Mark Perry and Anastase Rulibikiye with Health Canada; Mr John van den Beuken with New Zealand Ministry for Primary Industries (MPI); Dr Paul Brent with FSANZ; Dr Inocencio Higuera, Centro de Investigation Científica de Yucatán; and Dr Tomás González Estrada, Consejo de Ciencia y Tecnologia del Estrado de Yucatán.
References
- [ANMAT] Administración Nacional de Medicamentos, Alimentos y Tecnología Médica (The National Administration of Drugs, Foods, and Medical Technology) VISTO el Decreto N-1269/92 y el expediente N° 2020-16.628/92-1 del registro de la Secretaria de Salud del Ministerio de Salud y Accion Social, y [History] Buenos Aires: República Argentina; 1992. Available from: http://www.anmat.gov.ar/webanmat/Legislacion/NormasGenerales/Decreto_1490-1992.pdf. [Google Scholar]
- [ANMAT] Administración Nacional de Medicamentos, Alimentos y Tecnología Médica (The National Administration of Drugs, Foods, and Medical Technology) [Internet] Buenos Aires: República Argentina; 2010. Available from: http://www.anmat.gov.ar/alimentos/normativas_alimentos_caa.asp. [Google Scholar]
- [ANVISA] Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária (National Health Surveillance Agency) Legislation, Food [Internet] Brasilia: Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária; 2003. Available from: http://portal.anvisa.gov.br/wps/portal/anvisaingles [English, copyright 2003]. [Google Scholar]
- [ANVISA] Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária (National Health Surveillance Agency) Alimentos [Internet] Brasilia: Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária; 2009. Available from: http://www.anvisa.gov.br/alimentos/pro-grama/index.htm [© 2005–2009]. [Google Scholar]
- Augustin MA, Sanguansri P. Nanostructured materials in the food industry. Adv Food Nutr Res. 2009;58:183–213. doi: 10.1016/S1043-4526(09)58005-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [CFIA] Canadian Food Inspection Agency. [Internet] Ottawa (ON): Canadian Food Inspection Agency, Bureau of Food Safety and Consumer Protection, Fair Labelling Practices Program; 2011. Available from: http://www.inspection.gc.ca/english/toce.shtml. [Google Scholar]
- Card JW, Jonaitis TS, Tafazoli S, Magnuson BA. An appraisal of the published literature on the safety and toxicity of food-related nanomaterials. Crit Rev Toxicol. 2011;41:22–51. doi: 10.3109/10408444.2010.524636. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chaudhry Q, Scotter M, Blackburn J, Ross B, Boxall A, Castle L, Aitken R, Watkins R. Applications and implications of nanotechnologies for the food sector. Food Addit Contam Part A Chem Anal Control Expo Risk Assess. 2008;25:241. doi: 10.1080/02652030701744538. 258. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Codex. Current official standards [Internet] Rome (Italy): Codex Alimentarius Commission; 2011. Available from: http://www.codexalimentarius.net/web/standard_list.jsp. [Google Scholar]
- Codex Alimentarius Commission. Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Programme. 15th ed. Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations; 2005. Procedural manual [Internet] [cited 2010 Dec 22]. Available from: http://www.fao.org/docrep/009/a0247e/a0247e00.HTM. [Google Scholar]
- Codex Alimentarius Commission. Understanding the Codex Alimentarius. 3rd ed. Rome (Italy): Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO), Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Programme; 2006. [Internet]. [cited 2011 Jun 1]. Available from: ftp://ftp.fao.org/codex/Publications/understanding/Understanding_EN.pdf. [Google Scholar]
- COFEPRIS. [Internet] Comisión Federal Para La Protección Contra Riesgos Sanitarios, México Algunos Derechos Reservados. 2010. Available from: http://www.cofepris.gob.mx/ [©2010 – Políticas De Privacidad].
- Commonwealth of Australia. Food Standards Australia New Zealand Act 1991. [Internet] Canberra (Australia): Commonwealth of Australia, Attorney-General's Department; 2007. [cited 2011 Mar 10]. Available from: http://www.comlaw.gov.au/Details/C2007C00477. [Google Scholar]
- [CONAL] La Comisión Nacional de Alimentos (National Committee of Food) Sistema Nacional de Control de Alimentos Decreto 815/99 [National System of Food Control, Created by Presidential Decree 815/99] Buenos Aires: República Argentina; 1999. [Internet]. Available from: http://www.conal.gov.ar/Documentos/Decreto_815/815-99.htm. [Google Scholar]
- [CONAL] La Comisión Nacional de Alimentos (National Committee of Food) Reglamento go to Guia. Buenos Aires: República Argentina; 2011. [Internet]. Available from: www.conal.gov.ar. [Google Scholar]
- Department of Justice Canada. Food and Drug Regulations (C.R.C., c. 870). [Consolidation; Regulation current to February 26, 2011]. [Internet] Ottawa (ON): Department of Justice Canada; 2011. [cited 2011 Feb 25]. Available from: http://laws.justice.gc.ca/PDF/Regulation/C/C.R.C.c.870.pdf. [Google Scholar]
- EFSA Panel on Food Additives and Nutrient Sources added to Food (ANS) Guidance for submission for food additive evaluations. EFSA J. 2012;10:2760. [60 pp.]. doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2012.2760. Available from: www.efsa.europa.eu/efsajournal. [Google Scholar]
- EFSA Scientific Committee. Guidance on the risk assessment of the application of nanoscience and nanotechnologies in the food and feed chain. EFSA J. 2011;9:2140. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5327. [36 pp]. Available from: www.efsa.europa.eu/efsajournal. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- EFSA Scientific Committee. Scientific opinion on exploring options for providing advice about possible human health risks based on the concept of Threshold of Toxicological Concern (TTC) EFSA J. 2012;10:2750. [103 pp]. doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2012.2750; [cited 2012 Jul 30]. Available from: www.efsa.europa.eu/efsajournal. [Google Scholar]
- [EC] European Commission. Introduction to nanotechnologies. [Internet] Brussels (Belgium): European Commission; 2009. [cited 2011 Mar 1]. Available from: http://ec.europa.eu/nanotechnology/indexen.html. [Google Scholar]
- [EC] European Commission. Food Safety Site. [Internet] Brussels (Belgium): European Commission (EC), DG Health and Consumer Protection; 2011. [cited 2011 Mar 1]. Available from: http://ec.europa.eu/food/food/indexen.htm. [Google Scholar]
- [EFSA] European Food Safety Authority. Guidance of EFSA prepared by the Scientific Panel of Food Contact Material, Enzymes, Flavourings and Processing Aids on the Submission of a Dossier on Food Enzymes (Question No EFSA-Q-2007-080, adopted on 12 August 2009 by European Food Safety Authority) EFSA J. 2009;1305:1–26. [Internet]; [cited 2011 Mar 1]. Available from: http://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/efsajournal/pub/1305.htm. [Google Scholar]
- Europa. Treaty establishing the European Economic Community, EEC treaty – original text (non-consolidated version). [Internet] Brussels (Belgium): Europa, Gateway to the European Union; 2007a. [cited 2010 Oct 26]. Available from: http://europa.eu/legislation_summaries/institutional_affairs/treaties/treaties_eec_en.htm. [Google Scholar]
- Europa. Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community (Euratom). [Internet] Brussels (Belgium): Europa, Gateway to the European Union; 2007b. [cited 2007 Oct 19]. Available from: http://europa.eu/legislation_summaries/institutional_affairs/treaties/treaties_euratom_en.htm. [Google Scholar]
- [FAO/WHO] Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations/World Health Organization. FAO/WHO Expert Meeting on the Application of Nanotechnologies in the Food and Agriculture Sectors: Potential Food Safety Implications: Meeting Report. 2010. p. 130. Rome.
- [FDA] Food and Drug Administration. Food additives: Threshold of regulation for substances used in food-contact articles. 1995. Final rule [21 CFR Parts 5, 25, 170, 171, and 174,
- Docket Nos. 77P-0122 and 92N-0181]. Fed Regist (US).
- [Internet]. [cited]. 60:36582–36596; [cited 2013 Mar 3]. Available from: http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-1995-07-17/pdf/95-17435.pdf.
- Food and Drug Administration. Draft Guidance for Industry: Assessing the effects of significant manufacturing process changes, including emerging technologies, on the safety and regulatory status of food ingredients and food contact substances, including food ingredients that are color additives [Internet]; [cited 2012 Apr 25] 2012. Available from: http://www.regulations.gov/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480ffaf8f&disposition=inline&contentType=html.
- Food Safety Commission. The food safety basic law (tentative translation) [Internet] Tokyo (Japan): Food Safety Commission Secretariat; 2006. Available from: http://www.fsc.go.jp/sonota/fsb_law1807.pdf [Law No. 48, May 23, 2003, Last amendment: No. 50, Jun 2, 2006]. [Google Scholar]
- [FSANZ] Foods Standards Australia New Zealand. Australia New Zealand Food Standards Code [Internet] Canberra (Australia): Foods Standards Australia New Zealand; 2011a. Available from: http://www.foodstandards.gov.au/foodstandards/foodstandardscode.cfm [Last amended: 10 February 2011]. [Google Scholar]
- [FSANZ] Foods Standards Australia New Zealand. Nanotechnology and food. [Internet] Canberra (Australia): Foods Standards Australia New Zealand; 2011b. [cited 2011 Mar 9]. Available from: http://www.foodstandards.gov.au/consumerinformation/nanotechnologyandfoo4542.cfm. [Google Scholar]
- [FSANZ] Foods Standards Australia New Zealand. [Internet] Canberra (Australia): Foods Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ); 2011c. [cited 2011 Feb 25]. Available from: http://www.foodstandards.gov.au/ [Google Scholar]
- Government of Japan. EU list of additives for approval in Japan. (Annex). [Internet] Tokyo (Japan): Government of Japan, Cabinet Office; 2002. [cited 2002 Oct 21]. Available from: http://www8.cao.go.jp/kisei/giji/02/009/2-1-6e.pdf. [Google Scholar]
- Health Canada. Canada's strategic framework for participation in the joint FAO/WHO food standards program. 2009a.
- [Internet]. Ottawa (ON): Health Canada; [cited 2009 Feb 26]. Available from: http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/fn-an/intactivit/codex/activit/strateg-codex-2008-2012-eng.php.
- Health Canada. Nanotechnology at Health Canada. [Internet] Ottawa (ON): Health Canada; 2009b. [cited 2011 Oct 28]. Available from: http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/dhp-mps/nano-eng.php. [Google Scholar]
- Health Canada. Interim policy statement on Health Canada's working definition for nanomaterials. [Internet] Ottawa (ON): Health Canada; 2010. [cited 2011 Mar 21]. Available from: http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/sr-sr/consult/_2010/nanomater/draft-ebauche-eng.php. [Google Scholar]
- Health Canada. Food and nutrition [Internet] Ottawa (ON): Health Canada; 2011. [cited 2011 Feb 22]. Available from: http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/fn-an/index-eng.php. [Google Scholar]
- JECFA. Procedures for the testing of intentional food additives to establish their safety for use. 1958. Second Report of the Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives (JECFA), June 17–24, 1957, Geneva, Switz. (WHO Technical Report Series, no. 144) [Internet]. Geneva (Switzerland): World Health Organization (WHO). Available from: http://whqlibdoc.who.int/trs/WHO_TRS_144.pdf. [PubMed]
- JECFA. General specifications and considerations for enzyme preparations used in food processing [Internet]; [cited 2013 Mar 3] 2001. Available from: http://www.fao.org/ag/agn/jecfa-additives/docs/enzymes_en.htm.
- JETRO. Food sanitation law in Japan [Internet] Tokyo (Japan): Japan External Trade Organization (JETRO); 2006. [cited 2011 Mar 15]. Available from: http://www.foodluh.org/en/pdf/Food%20Sanitation%20Law%20in%20Japan.pdf. [Google Scholar]
- Locascio LE, Reipa V, Zook JM, Pleus RC. Toxicity: emerging standards and efforts to support standards development (Chapter 8) In: Murashov V, Howard J, editors. Nanotechnology Standards. (Nanostructure Science and Technology) New York (NY): Springer Science + Business Media, LLC; 2011. pp. 179–208. [Google Scholar]
- Magnuson BA, Jonaitis TS, Card JW. A briefreview of the occurrence, use, and safety of food-related nanomaterials. J Food Sci. 2011;76:R126–R126. doi: 10.1111/j.1750-3841.2011.02170.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mercosur. List of permitted food additives available. 2006. In: Mercosur/Gmc/Res. N° 11/06: Reglamento Tècnico Mercosur Sobre “Lista General Armonizada de Aditivos Alimentarios y Sus Clases Funcionales”. Montevideo/República Oriental del Uruguay: Mercosur [An economic and political agreement between Argentina, Brazil, Paraguay and Uruguay] [Internet]. Available from: http://www.mercosur.int/msweb/Normas/normas_web/Resoluciones/ES/GMC_2006_RES-011_ES_RTM-Aditivos%20Alimentarios.pdf.
- Mercosur. Food contact substances. 2007. In: Mercosur/GMC/Res. N° 34/07 Reglamento Técnico Mercosur Sobre la Exclusión de Uso de Aditivos Alimentarios [GMC 34/07 – List of Food Additives not Permitted for Use]. Puntofocal, Ministerio de Economia y Finanzas Publicas – Secretaria de Comercio Interior. Montevideo/República Oriental del Uruguay: Mercosur [An economic and political agreement between Argentina, Brazil, Paraguay and Uruguay]. Available from: http://www.puntofocal.gov.ar/doc/r_gmc_34-07.pdf.
- Mercosur. TEMA [Topic: list of food] 2010. Puntofocal, Ministerio de Economia y Finanzas Publicas – Secretaria de Comercio Interior. Montevideo/República Oriental del Uruguay: Mercosur [An economic and political agreement between Argentina, Brazil, Paraguay and Uruguay] [Internet]. Available from: http://www.puntofocal.gov.ar/mercosur_sgt_alimentos.htm.
- Mercosur. [Página Brasileira do Mercosul] Braslia: Mercosul; 2011. [An economic and political agreement between. [Google Scholar]
- Argentina Brazil. Paraguay and Uruguay] [Internet] Available from: http://www.mercosul.gov.br/
- [MHLW] Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare, Japan. Japan's specifications and standards for food additives. 7th ed. Tokyo (Japan): Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare, Japan and Translated by Japan Food Chemical Research Foundation; 2000. [Internet] [cited 2006 Nov 30]. Available from: http://www.ffcr.or.jp/zaidan/FFCRHOME.nsf/pages/spec.stand.fa. [Google Scholar]
- [MHLW] Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare, Japan. [Internet] Tokyo (Japan): Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare, Japan; 2011a. [cited 2011 Mar 16]. Available from: http://www.mhlw.go.jp/english/index.html. [Google Scholar]
- [MHLW] Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare, Japan. Food Safety Information [Internet] Tokyo (Japan): Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare, Japan; 2011b. [cited 2011 Mar 16]. Available from: http://www.mhlw.go.jp/english/topics/foodsafety/administration/index.html#02. [Google Scholar]
- [MHLW] Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare, Japan. Food additives [Internet] Tokyo (Japan): Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare, Japan; 2011c. [cited 2011 Mar 16]. Available from: http://www.mhlw.go.jp/english/topics/foodsafety/foodadditives/index.html. [Google Scholar]
- Ministério da Saude. [Internet] Braslia, Brazil: Ministério da Saude; 2011. (Ministry of Health). Available from: http://portal.saude.gov.br/portal/saude/default.cfm. [Google Scholar]
- Ministerio de Salud. [Internet] Ministerio de Salud (Ministry of Health): Buenos Aires; 2011. República Argentina. Available from: http://www.msal.gov.ar/ [Google Scholar]
- Ministry of Health of the People's Republic of China. [Internet Chinese] Beijing (China): Ministry of Health of the People's Republic of China; 2010. Available from: http://www.moh.gov.cn/publicfiles//business/htmlfiles/wsb/index.htm. [Google Scholar]
- Ministry of Justice. Food Sanitation Act (Law number: Act No. 233 of 1947. 2009. Amendment: Act No. 53 of 2006) [Internet]. Tokyo (Japan): Ministry of Justice. Available from: http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=12&vm=04&re=_02 [Translation date: April 1, 2009].
- [NCNST] National Center for Nanoscience and Technology. 2010. [English Version of http://www.nanoctr.cas.cn/Internet]. Beijing: National Center for Nanoscience and Technology. Available from: http://english.nanoctr.cas.cn/ [Copyright @2005–2008].
- Neltner TG, Kulkarni NR, Alger HM, Maffini MV, Bongard ED, Fortin ND, Olson ED. Navigating the U.S. Food Additive Regulatory Program. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf. 2011;10:342–368. [Google Scholar]
- [OAG] Office of the Auditor General of Canada. Chapter 12—Creation of the Canadian Food Inspection Agency: main points. 1998. In: 1998 September Report of the Auditor General of Canada [Internet]; [cited 1988 Sep 1]. Available from: http://www.oag-bvg.gc.ca/internet/English/parl_oag_199809_12_e_9318.html#mp.
- [PEN] Project on Emerging Nanotechnologies. Consumer products [Internet] Washington (DC): Project on Emerging Nanotechnologies; 2011. [cited 2011 Mar 21]. Available from: http://www.nanotechproject.org/inventories/consumer/ [Google Scholar]
- Roberts A, Rogerson R. Chinese approach on regulating food additives, novel foods, functional foods and dietary supplements (Chapter 19) In: Bagchi D, editor. Nutraceutical and functional food regulations in the United States and around the world. (Food Science and Technology International Series) New York (NY): Elsevier; 2008. p. 291. 303. [Google Scholar]
- Rulis AM, Levitt JA. FDA's food ingredient approval process safety assurance based on scientific assessment, Washington, DC. Regul Toxicol Pharm. 2009;53:20–31. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2008.10.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Secretaría de Salud México. Acuerdo por el que se determinan las sustancias permitidas como aditivos y coadyuvantes [Agreement defines the permitted substances as additives and processing aids] [Internet] Cuauhtémoc (México): Secretaría de Salud México/National Law Center for Inter-American Free Trade; 1999. [cited 1999 Dec 15]. Available from: http://natlaw.com/interam/ar/md/ac/acarmd9.htm. [Google Scholar]
- Smith RL, Waddell WJ, Cohen SM, Fukushima S, Gooderham NJ, Hecht SS, Marnett LJ, Portoghese PS, Rietjens IMCM, Adams TB, et al. GRAS Flavoring Substances 25: The 25th publication by the Expert Panel of the Flavor and Extract Manufacturers Association provides an update on recent progress in the consideration of flavoring ingredients generally recognized as safe under the Food Additive Amendment. Food Technol. 2011;65:44. 75. Available from: http://www.femaflavor.org/publications/gras Stamm H, Gibson N, Anklam E. 2012. Detection of nanomaterials in food and consumer products: Bridging the gap from legislation to enforcement. Food Addit Contam Part A. [Google Scholar]
- 29:1175 1182.
- [USDA] U.S. Department of Agriculture. Mexico publishes the list of authorized additives for food and beverages. (GAIN Report No. MX6058) [Internet] Washington (DC): U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), Foreign Agricultural Service, Global Agricultural Information Network (GAIN); 2006a. Mexico: FAIRS product specific. [cited 2006 July 21]. Available from: http://www.fas.usda.gov/gainfiles/200607/146208414.pdf. [Google Scholar]
- [USDA] U.S. Department of Agriculture. Mexico publishes the list of authorized additives for food and beverages-purified substances, enzymes & synthetic flavors. (GAIN Report No. MX6070) [Internet] Washington (DC): U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), Foreign Agricultural Service, Global Agricultural Information Network (GAIN); 2006b. Mexico: FAIRS product specific. [cited 2006 Sep 7]. Available from: http://www.fas.usda.gov/GainFiles/200609/146218899.pdf. [Google Scholar]
- [USDA] U.S. Department of Agriculture. China, Peoples Republic of FAIRS Product Specific Administrative Measures on Novel Foods (revised version) 2006. (GAIN Report No. 7020) [Internet] Washington (DC): U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), Foreign Agricultural Service, Global Agricultural Information Network (GAIN); 2007. [cited 2007 Mar 7]. Available from: http://www.fas.usda.gov/gainfiles/200704/146280956.pdf. [Google Scholar]
- [USDA] U.S. Department of Agriculture. China, Peoples Republic of FAIRS Subject Report China Publishes Food Additive Compendium (GAIN Report No. CH8018) [Internet] Washington (DC): U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), Foreign Agricultural Service, Global Agricultural Information Network (GAIN); 2008. [cited 2008 Mar 20]. Available from: http://www.fas.usda.gov/GainFiles/200803/146294056.pdf. [Google Scholar]
- [USDA] U.S. Department of Agriculture. Mexico: Food and Agricultural Import Regulations and Standards – Narrative (FAIRS Country Report). (GAIN Report No. MX9325) [Internet] Washington (DC): U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), Foreign Agricultural Service, Global Agricultural Information Network (GAIN); 2009. [cited 2009 Aug 17]. Available from: http://gain.fas.usda.gov/Recent%20GAIN%20Publications/Food%20and%20Agricultural%20Import%20Regulations%20and%20Standards%20-%20Narrative_Mexico_Mexico_8-20-2009.pdf. [Google Scholar]
- [USDA] U.S. Department of Agriculture. Argentina: Food and Agricultural Import Regulations and Standards – Narrative. 2010a. FAIRS Country Report. (GAIN Report) [Internet]. Washington (DC): U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), Foreign Agricultural Services, Global Agricultural Information Network (GAIN); [cited 2010 Aug 11]. Available from: http://gain.fas.usda.gov/Recent%20GAIN%20Publications/Food%20and%20Agricultural%20Import%20Regulations%20and%20Standards%20-%20Narrative_Buenos%20Aires_Argentina_10-28-2010.pdf.
- [USDA] U.S. Department of Agriculture. China – Peoples Republic of Post: Beijing Food Additive Registration Report Categories: FAIRS Subject Report. (GAIN Report No. – N/A) [Internet] Washington (DC): U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), Foreign Agricultural Service, Global Agricultural Information Network (GAIN); 2010b. [cited 2010 May 12]. Available from: http://gain.fas.usda.gov/Recent%20GAIN%20Publications/Food%20Additive%20Registration_Beijing_China%20-%20Peoples%20Republic%20of_5-12-2010.pdf. [Google Scholar]
- [USDA] U.S. Department of Agriculture. Japan Announces Withdrawal of 80 Food Additives. (GAIN Report No. JA0024) [Internet] Washington (DC): U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), Foreign Agricultural Service, Global Agricultural Information Network (GAIN); 2010c. [cited 2010 Aug 13]. Available from: http://gain.fas.usda.gov/Recent%20GAIN%20Publications/Withdrawal%20of%2080%20′no%20longer%20distributed'%20Existing%20Food%20Additives_Tokyo_Japan_8-13-2010.pdf. [Google Scholar]
- WHO. EHC 240. 2009. Principles and methods for the risk assessment of chemicals in food. ISBN 978 92 4 157240 8 [Internet]. Available from: http://www.who.int/foodsafety/chem/principles/en/index1.html.
- [WTO] World Trade Organization. Notification: Withdrawal of 80 Food Additives, Which are no Longer Distributed in Japan, from the List of the Existing Food Additives [Internet] Geneva (Switzerland): World Trade Organization; 2010. [Submitted for comment: 2010 May 18]. Available from: http://members.wto.org/crnattachments/2010/sps/JPN/10_2581_00_e.pdf. [Google Scholar]