β-Keto esters from ketones and ethyl chloroformate: a rapid, general, efficient synthesis of pyrazolones and their antimicrobial, in silico and in vitro cytotoxicity studies

Abstract

Background

Pyrazolones are traditionally synthesized by the reaction of β-keto esters with hydrazine and its derivatives. There are methods to synthesize β-keto esters from esters and aldehydes, but these methods have main limitation in varying the substituents. Often, there are a number of methods such as acylation of enolates in which a chelating effect has been employed to lock the enolate anion using lithium and magnesium salts; however, these methods suffer from inconsistent yields in the case of aliphatic acylation. There are methods to synthesize β-keto esters from ketones like caboxylation of ketone enolates using carbon dioxide and carbon monoxide sources in the presence of palladium or transition metal catalysts. Currently, the most general and simple method to synthesize β-keto ester is the reaction of dimethyl or ethyl carbonate with ketone in the presence of strong bases which also requires long reaction time, use of excessive amount of reagent and inconsistent yield. These factors lead us to develop a simple method to synthesize β-keto esters by changing the base and reagent.

Results

A series of β-keto esters were synthesized from ketones and ethyl chloroformate in the presence of base which in turn are converted to pyrazolones and then subjected to cytotoxicity studies towards various cancer cell lines and antimicrobial activity studies towards various bacterial and fungal strains.

Conclusion

The β-keto esters from ethyl chloroformate was successfully attempted, and the developed method is simple, fast and applicable to the ketones having the alkyl halogens, protecting groups like Boc and Cbz that were tolerated and proved to be useful in the synthesis of fused bicyclic and tricyclic pyrazolones efficiently using cyclic ketones. Since this method is successful for different ketones, it can be useful for the synthesis of pharmaceutically important pyrazolones also. The synthesized pyrazolones were subjected to antimicrobial, docking and cytotoxicity assay against ACHN (human renal cell carcinoma), Panc-1 (human pancreatic adenocarcinoma) and HCT-116 (human colon cancer) cell line, and lead molecules have been identified. Some of the compounds are found to have promising activity against different bacterial and fungal strains tested.

Background

Pyrazolones are important class of heterocyclic ring systems that have been used extensively in pharmaceutical industry [1,2] due to their numerous applications as analgesic, antipyretic, antiarthritic, uricosuric, anti-inflammatory and antiphlogistic properties. Especially, a pyrazolone derivative (edaravone) [3] acts as a radical scavenger to interrupt the peroxidative chain reactions and membrane disintegrations associated with ischemia [4-6]. Some of the aryloxypyrazolone derivatives are useful in the treatment of a variety of disorders caused by human immunodeficiency virus and other genetic ailments caused by retroviruses such as acquired immune deficiency syndrome [7]. In addition, these compounds are appropriate precursors for industrial preparation of herbicides [8], liquid crystals [9,10], dyes [11], thermally stable polymers [12] and colour photographical compounds [13]. Azadienophiles from the chemical oxidation of pyrazolones are acting as suitable substrates for hetero Diels-Alder reactions [14].

Pyrazolones are traditionally synthesized by the reaction of β-keto esters with hydrazine and its derivatives [15-21]. There are a number of alternative methods to synthesize pyrazolones which are documented in the literature [22-33] but tend to have serious drawbacks such as step-intensive, carbon monoxide usage and sensitive palladium catalysts. These factors revealed that using β-keto esters as an intermediate is the broadest and most efficient way to synthesize pyrazolones. There are methods to synthesize β-keto esters from esters [34-37] (Claisen condensation) and aldehydes [38,39], but these methods have main limitation in varying the substituents. Often, a number of methods such as acylation of enolates of malonates [40,41], acylation of Meldrum's acid [42-45], mixed malonate esters [46,47] and bistrimethylsilylmalonate [48,49] have a chelating effect employed to lock the enolate anion of malonate using lithium and magnesium salts [50,51]; however, these methods suffer from inconsistent yields in the case of aliphatic acylation. There are methods to synthesize β-keto esters from ketones like caboxylation of ketone enolates [52-54] using carbon dioxide and carbon monoxide sources in the presence of palladium or transition metal catalysts. Currently, the most general and simple method to synthesize β-keto ester is the reaction of dimethyl or ethyl carbonate with ketone in the presence of strong bases [55,56]. This method requires long reaction time, use of excessive amount of reagent and inconsistent yield. These factors lead us to develop a simple method to synthesize β-keto esters by changing the base and reagent.

Methods

Antibacterial study

The newly synthesized pyrazoles for their antibacterial activity against Escherichia coli (ATTC-25922), Staphylococcus aureus (ATTC-25923), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (ATTC-27853) and Klebsiella pneumonia (recultured) bacterial strains by the disc diffusion method [57,58]. The discs measuring 6.25 mm in diameter were punched from Whatman No. 1 filter paper (GE Healthcare, Little Chalfont, UK). Batches of 100 discs were dispensed to each screw-capped bottle and sterilized by dry heat at 140°C for an hour. The test compounds were prepared with different concentrations using DMF. One milliliter containing 100 times the amount of chemical in each disc was added to each bottle, which contains 100 discs. The discs of each concentration were placed in triplicate in a nutrient agar medium separately seeded with fresh bacteria. The incubation was carried out at 37°C for 24 h. Solvent and growth controls were kept, and the zones of inhibition and minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) were noted. Results of these studies were given in Table 1 and compared with the standard ciprofloxacin.

Table 1.

Antibacterial activity of the newly synthesized compounds

	S. aureus	E. coli	P. aeruginosa	K. pneumonia
Compound number
1	21 (6.25)	17 (6.25)	18 (6.25)	20 (6.25)
2	20 (6.25)	18 (6.25)	19 (6.25)	21 (6.25)
3	23 (6.25)	19 (6.25)	20 (6.25)	22 (6.25)
4	20 (6.25)	17 (6.25)	18 (6.25)	19 (6.25)
5	16 (100)	17 (100)	12 (100)	14 (100)
6	17 (100)	17 (100)	11 (100)	15 (100)
7	26 (12.5)	23 (12.5)	21 (12.5)	20 (12.5)
8	19 (100)	23 (100)	22 (100)	16 (100)
9	26 (6.25)	23 (6.25)	21 (6.25)	20 (6.25)
10	22 (6.25)	18 (6.25)	19 (6.25)	21 (6.25)
11	17 (6.25)	21 (6.25)	20 (6.25)	21 (6.25)
13	28 (12.5)	22 (12.5)	25 (12.5)	23 (12.5)
14	29 (12.5)	25 (12.5)	22 (12.5)	21 (12.5)
15	23 (6.25)	20 (6.25)	21 (6.25)	22 (6.25)
17	31 (12.5)	25 (12.5)	27 (12.5)	20 (12.5)
19	18 (6.25)	19 (6.25)	22 (6.25)	20 (6.25)
20	24 (6.25)	25 (6.25)	26 (6.25)	26 (6.25)
21	30 (12.5)	24 (12.5)	25 (12.5)	22 (12.5)
23	24 (12.5)	27 (12.5)	24 (12.5)	23 (12.5)
24	16 (100)	17 (100)	12 (100)	14 (100)
25	21 (12.5)	24 (12.5)	26 (12.5)	22 (12.5)
26	21 (6.25)	23 (6.25)	22 (6.25)	20 (6.25)
Ciprofloxacin	23 (6.25)	32 (6.25)	28 (6.25)	24 (6.25)

Zone of inhibition (mm); MIC (μg/mL) given in parenthesis.

Antifungal activity

Newly synthesized pyrazoles were screened for their antifungal activity against Aspergillus flavus (NCIM no. 524), Aspergillus fumigates (NCIM no. 902), Penicillium marneffei (recultured) and Trichophyton mentagrophytes (recultured) in dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) by the serial plate dilution method [34-36]. Sabouraud agar media was prepared by dissolving peptone (1 g), d-glucose (4 g) and agar (2 g) in distilled water (100 mL), and the pH was adjusted to 5.7. Normal saline was used to make a suspension of spores of fungal strain for lawning. A loopful of particular fungal strain was transferred to 3 mL of saline to get a suspension of corresponding species. Agar media of 20 mL was poured into each Petri dish. An excess of suspension was decanted, and the plates were dried by placing them in an incubator at 37°C for 1 h. Using an agar, punch wells were made on these seeded agar plates, and 10 to 50 μg/mL of the test compounds in DMSO were added into each labelled well. A control was also prepared for plates in the same way using solvent DMSO. The Petri dishes were prepared in triplicate and maintained at 37°C for 3 to 4 days. Antifungal activity was determined by measuring the inhibition zone. The results of these studies were given in Table 2 and compared with the standard ciclopiroxolamine.

Table 2.

Antifungal activities of the newly synthesized compounds

	Trichophyton	Penicillium	A. flavus	A. fumigates
Compound number
1	25 (6.25)	23 (6.25)	26 (6.25)	27 (6.25)
2	24 (6.25)	25 (6.25)	24 (6.25)	26 (6.25)
3	29 (6.25)	26 (6.25)	27 (6.25)	28 (6.25)
4	21 (6.25)	22 (6.25)	26 (6.25)	22 (6.25)
5	16 (12.5)	17 (12.5)	12 (12.5)	14 (12.5)
6	17 (12.5)	17 (12.5)	11 (12.5)	15 (12.5)
7	24 (12.5)	21 (12.5)	21 (12.5)	20 (12.5)
8	26 (12.5)	24 (12.5)	27 (12.5)	23 (12.5)
9	27 (12.5)	25 (12.5)	28 (12.5)	22 (12.5)
10	20 (6.25)	22 (6.25)	17 (6.25)	22 (6.25)
11	21 (6.25)	21 (6.25)	23 (6.25)	21 (6.25)
13	22 (12.5)	25 (12.5)	27 (12.5)	23 (12.5)
14	30 (12.5)	22 (12.5)	26 (12.5)	24 (12.5)
15	26 (12.5)	23 (12.5)	27 (12.5)	23 (12.5)
17	31 (12.5)	25 (12.5)	28 (12.5)	23 (12.5)
19	25 (6.25)	24 (6.25)	27 (6.25)	24 (6.25)
20	28 (12.5)	29 (12.5)	25 (12.5)	25 (12.5)
21	31 (12.5)	28 (12.5)	27 (12.5)	24 (12.5)
23	29 (12.5)	27 (12.5)	26 (12.5)	21 (12.5)
24	23 (12.5)	26 (12.5)	23 (12.5)	25 (12.5)
25	21 (6.25)	20 (6.25)	21 (6.25)	23 (6.25)
26	25 (12.5)	22 (12.5)	27 (12.5)	28 (12.5)
Standard	27 (3.125)	23 (6.25)	27 (3.125)	26 (6.25)

Zone of inhibition (mm), MIC (μg/mL) given in parenthesis and ciclopiroxolamine as standard.

Docking studies

All the synthesized compounds 1 to 26 have been subjected to the docking studies against ACHN (human renal cell carcinoma), Panc-1 (human pancreatic adenocarcinoma) and HCT-116 (human colon cancer) and then subjected to WST-1 cytotoxicity assay. Based on the crystal structures of the target proteins and high-throughput molecular docking methods, four phases of Gemdock methods were used. These phases include target protein structure analysis, ligand optimization, molecular docking and post-docking analysis. The macro- and small-molecule optimization phase involved in editing the structural coordinates of the target protein and compounds. The third phase was molecular docking method to identify potential leads for the target protein; then, the fourth phase was post-docking analysis to identify best conformation of ligand molecule. In the present study, the coordinates of three cancer target proteins were selected and obtained from the Protein Data Bank (PDB) [59]. The PDB entry 1SVC (pancreatic cancer), 3B8Q (renal cancer) and 4FLH (colon cancer) were selected for structural analysis based on its high-resolution crystallographic structure. For docking studies, the PDB coordinates of obtained target proteins were edited by removing the co-crystallized ligand molecule. The crystallographic water molecules were eliminated from the atomic coordinate file, and the polar hydrogen atoms and Kollman united charges were added to each target protein, followed by structure optimization and refinement using spdbv viewer [60]. The synthesized chemical compound structures were sketched with the help of ChemSketch [61]. A three-dimensional (3D) conversion and geometry optimization of all the compounds were performed using chimera [62] for flexible conformations of the compounds during the docking. To study the detailed intermolecular interactions between the target protein and the ligand molecule, automated docking program iGEMDOCK (a generic evolutionary method for molecular DOCKing) software was used [63]. iGEMDOCK integrated the virtual screening, molecular docking, post-screening analysis and visualization steps. We selected nuclear factor kappa b (NF-κb), vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 and human phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K-gamma) (PDB ID: 1SVC, 3B8Q and 4FLH, respectively) as target proteins to carry out the docking analysis of our synthesized compounds. The 3D coordinates of each therapeutic target protein were implemented through the GEMDOCK graphical environment interface. Then, the default option was used to import the 3D coordinates of 27 synthesized compounds. Before docking, the output path was set. GEMDOCK default parameters included the population size (n = 200), generation (g = 70) and number of solutions (s = 10) to compute the probable binding conformation of synthesized compounds. Then, the docking run was started using GEMDOCK scoring function. After docking, the individual binding conformation of each ligand was observed, and their binding affinity with the target proteins was analyzed. The best binding pose and binding energy of each ligand was selected. In the post-docking analysis, van der Waals score, Z score and the details of interacted residues were saved in output folder. Protein-ligand binding site was analyzed and visualized using PyMOL [64]. The three-dimensional structures of NF-κb, vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 and human phosphoinositide 3-kinase are analyzed, and synthesized compounds 1 to 26 are optimized to have minimal potential energy using chimera. After minimization, all the ligands are docked into each target protein to study the molecular basis of interaction and binding affinity of all the synthesized compounds. From the docking analysis, we listed best conformers based on total energy, Z score and van der Waals score (VDW) for each ligand molecule (Tables 3,4,5). The best docking poses for each ligand molecule into each target protein are determined, and the one having the lowest binding energy among the 20 different poses generated. The lower energy scores represent better protein-ligand binding affinity compared to higher energy values.

Table 3.

Docking results of synthesized compounds in the binding site of nuclear factor kappa b

Compound number	Total energy	Z score	VDW
1	−74.15	−73.1	−73.15
2	−66.2304	−70.6	−56.7448
3	−78.2994	−90.8	−65.8385
4	−42.783	−45.93	−68.7026
5	−50.5602	−54.9	−50.366
6	−88.1508	−110.2	−70.312
7	−32.2859	−40.6	−55.3665
8	−49.5672	−50.8	−56.3479
9	−62.3895	−62.4	−50.3603
10	−74.4438	−72.3	−70.4519
11	−90.4298	−117.4	−80.5608
12	−83.3089	−90.4	−67.7796
13	−42.6816	−50.3	−60.7439
14	−91.9971	−119.9	−74.1695
15	−35.7564	−46.7	−68.4413
16	−72.932	−69.9	−60.4764
17	−60.4516	−60.2	−60.3893
18	−34.3128	−101.7	−53.5055
19	−41.0148	−50.9	−63.3827
20	−35.2375	−40.6	−87.3575
21	−79.2554	−85.2	−51.5586
22	−39.9575	−42.3	−67.6976
23	−32.1991	−42.3	−63.8354
24	−58.4277	−60.9	−67.0823
25	−58.424	−60.9	−53.7606
26	−30.0129	−44.6	−44.8782

Table 4.

Docking results of synthesized compounds in the binding site of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2

Compound number	Total energy	Z score	VDW
1	−75.0934	−72.2	−79.4166
2	−78.2062	−75.1	−69.6532
3	−70.5653	−95.6	−68.46
4	−78.7892	−72.3	−63.191
5	−65.564	−78.9	−59.3404
6	−86.6543	−105.7	−80.5888
7	−71.8927	−63.17	−59.0905
8	−95.9923	−120.5	−94.7849
9	−79.948	−71.9	−56.0692
10	−73.5766	−80	−86.6021
11	−72.3245	−73.6	−73.1902
12	−75.4277	−72.2	−70.7142
13	−85.3265	−94.6	−54.4274
14	−75.329	−75.3	−71.2839
15	−80.914	−75.1	−73.6739
16	−75.3033	−91.5	−63.0176
17	−68.7853	−74.3	−69.6841
18	−104.9856	−125.5	−105.697
19	−92.6464	−115.2	−87.8944
20	−74.3443	76.7	−70.902
21	−62.3597	−73.3	−50.6291
22	−60.2348	−78.2	−65.3015
23	−77.191	−75.6	−63.8723
24	−82.723	−77.2	−68.4238
25	−80.73	−75	−56.4072
26	−75.093	−104.3	−48.6469

Table 5.

Docking results of synthesized compounds in the binding site of phosphoinositide 3-kinase

Compound number	Total energy	Z score	VDW
1	−119.541	−122.5	−78.0144
2	−67.4663	68.3	−53.8734
3	−105.3452	−90.9	−68.1224
4	−75.0481	−75	−70.3258
5	−77.1818	−77.2	−61.47
6	−101.23	−105.1	−55.6405
7	−96.8291	−110.9	−54.3328
8	−92.0488	−92	−61.893
9	−75.3184	−75.3	−62.0764
10	−119.421	−120.5	−76.7195
11	92.8443	−92.3	−62.324
12	−83.9072	−83.9	−85.1019
13	−80.5887	−80.6	−66.5004
14	−107.157	−102.2	−62.1177
15	−76.9716	−77	−70.2072
16	−94.8943	−106.4	−52.3224
17	−90.9786	−91.4	−66.5817
18	−110.067	−91	−80.4918
19	−83.2508	−83.3	−54.2574
20	−76.3532	−76.3	−86.3532
21	−82.2975	−82.3	−54.9572
22	−74.2083	−74.2	−71.0281
23	−81.0895	−81.1	−63.5472
24	−76.2358	−76.2	−58.7925
25	−67.4663	−67.5	−49.4389
26	−80.9917	−81.1	−48.6582

Cytotoxicity studies

The compounds 1 to 26 have been subjected to cyctotoxicity studies. Towards this, a panel of three cancer cells representing multiple cancers of clinical relevance were obtained from American Type Culture Collection (ATCC), namely ACHN (human renal cell carcinoma), Panc-1 (human pancreatic adenocarcinoma) and HCT-116 (human colon cancer). Cells were maintained in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM) medium containing 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum and kept in humidified 5% CO₂ incubator at 37°C. Logarithmically, growing cells were plated at a density of 5 × 10³ cells/well in a 96-well tissue culture grade micro-plate and allowed to recover overnight. The cells were challenged with varying concentrations of compounds for 48 h. Control cells received standard media containing dimethylsulfoxide vehicle at a concentration of 0.2%. After 48 h of incubation, cell toxicity was determined by the Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK-8) reagent (Dojindo Molecular Technologies, Inc., Kumamoto, Japan); (WST-1 [2-(2-methoxy-4-nitrophenyl)-3-(4-nitrophenyl)-5-(2,4-disulfophenyl)]-2H-tetrazolium, monosodium salt assay). In accordance with the manufacturer's instructions [36], 5 μL/well CCK-8 reagent was added, and plates were incubated for 2 h. Cytotoxicity of all the compounds have been determined by measuring the absorbance on Tecan Sapphire multi-fluorescence micro-plate reader (Tecan GmbH, Crailsheim, Germany) at a wavelength of 450 nm corrected to 650 nm and normalized to controls. Each independent experiment was performed thrice and tabulated in Table 6.

Table 6.

Cytotoxic activity of the newly synthesized compounds 1 to 26

	Concentration (μg/mL)	Percentage of cytotoxicity/anti-proliferation
		Panc1 (pancreas)	ACHN (renal)	HCT116 (colon)
Compound number
1	10	−75	−7	−138
2	10	−64	5	1
3	10	−78	0	−16
4	10	−10	20	−12
5	10	−20	−3	6
6	10	−101	−25	−116
7	10	14	−16	−115
8	10	−15	−31	−107
9	10	−56	19	8
10	10	−75	−7	−138
11	10	−117	7	−107
12	10	−89	13	−70
13	10	−14	3	5
14	10	−118	−19	−123
15	10	12	5	17
16	10	−71	−10	−112
17	10	−51	4	−102
18	10	4	−41	−128
19	10	−10	−26	−80
20	10	71	73	79
21	10	−80	−5	−20
23	10	12	−7	−6
24	10	6	2	−103
25	10	−45	−18	−64
26	10	−7	−12	1
Tannase	10	17.3	12.4	9.7

Results and discussion

In continuation of our interest towards the synthesis of β-keto esters and pyrazolones [65-67], we made an attempt to synthesize β-keto esters from ethyl chloroformate in the presence of base which in turn are converted into pyrazolones in situ by the addition of either hydrazine or its derivatives, since we hypothesized that an enolate may react cleanly with highly electrophilic ethyl chloroformate to give β-keto esters. We tested our hypothesis in the synthesis of representative compound 12 by varying the solvents as well as bases (Scheme 1). The effects of base and solvent on the yield of 12 have been summarized and are given in Table 7.

Table 7.

Effect of solvent and base on the yield of 12

Base	Ketone (eq.)	Solvent	Temperature	Yield (%)a
LiHMDS (1.0M THF) (1 eq.)	3	THF	−78°C	68
LiHMDS (1.0M THF) (2 eq.)	3	Toluene	−78°C	56
KHMDS (3 eq.)	7	Toluene	−78°C	42
NaH (2 eq.)	50	THF	−78°C	17
NaOMe (2 eq.)	75	THF	Reflux	0
KOtBu (3 eq.)	10	THF	25°C	19
LiHMDS (1.0M THF) (3.5 eq.)	7	Toluene	−50°C to−30°C	92

^aIsolated yield.

Scheme 1.

Synthesis of β-keto esters from ethyl chloroformate and its conversion into pyrazolones.

The formation of β-keto ester was found to be in better yield when LiHMDS was used as a base. When other bases are used, the formation of β-keto ester intermediate from ketones was very slow, and the reactions were also found to be incomplete even after 4 to 5 h of stirring at r.t. The addition of hydrazine hydrate to the latter reaction mixtures gave the desired product in low yield (Table 8), and the corresponding hydrazone of ketones was isolated as the major product. After finding the suitable base, the reaction conditions were optimized further by varying the solvents to improve the yield. It was found that the hydrocarbon solvent (toluene) produced better yield compared to the cyclic ether solvent (THF). This may be due to the possible destabilization of formed intermediate with charge in the case of hydrocarbon solvent like toluene, and hence, the formed enolate reacts with ethyl chloroformate smoothly.

Table 8.

Synthesis of β-keto esters by cross-Claisen condensation

Compound number	Ester	Product	Yield (%)
1			78
2			75
3			64
4			72
5			80
6			69
7			74
8			74
9			58
10			70
11			80
12			92
13			72
14			77
15			84
16			78
17			65a
18			61
19			48
20			74
21			74
22			0a
23			81
24			78
25			81
26			79
27			0a

^aPercentage of products in crude LC-MS.

After optimizing the reaction with the suitable base (LiHMDS) and solvent (toluene), the same conditions were employed for the synthesis of various β-keto esters which in turn are converted into their corresponding pyrazolones 1 to 21 and 23 to 26in situ by the addition of either hydrazine or its derivatives to prove the generality of the reaction, and the results are tabulated in Table 8. The reactions have been monitored by thin layer chromatography (TLC), and the obtained crude products were purified by column chromatography. The β-keto esters were efficiently converted into their corresponding pyrazolones with good to excellent yields. All the synthesized compounds 1 to 21 and 23 to 26 have been characterized through IR, ¹H NMR, ¹³C NMR and mass spectral data. The examination of the ¹H NMR spectrum of 26 clearly shows that the formation of doublet at δ 1.34 ppm with the coupling constant of 6.92 Hz integrating for six protons is due to the two methyl groups of isopropyl substituent at C3 of pyrazolone moiety. A multiplet between δ 2.79 and 2.49 ppm integrating for one proton is due to the methine proton of iso-propyl substituent at C3 of pyrazolone moiety. The singlet at δ 3.33 ppm integrating for one proton is due to the proton at C4. Two broad singlets that appeared between δ 9.5 to 9.3 ppm and δ 11.2 to 11.1 ppm integrating for one proton each are due to -NH and -OH protons, respectively. This supports the ¹H NMR findings that pyrazolone moiety is in its enol rather than the keto form since the spectrum was recorded in deuterated DMSO solvent. Similarly, the examination of the ¹³C NMR spectrum reveals the following points. The two signals that appeared at aliphatic regions 22.24 and 25.69 ppm are due to methyl and methine carbon, respectively, of the iso-propyl substituent at C3 of the pyrazolone moiety. The signal at 86.22 ppm is due to the C4. The two downfield signals appeared at 160.75 and 150.39 ppm. The relatively downfield signal has been assigned as C5, and the relatively upfield has been assigned as C3. The m/z observed at 126.9 in liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) spectrum also supports the formation of compound 26. In the similar way, the chemical shifts of all the other compounds have been assigned and are included in the experimental part. Some of the compounds 4, 7, 16, 21, 23 and 24 have been crystallized and subjected to the single crystal X-ray diffraction studies [68-75] and are available in the literature (Ortep plots are included in the Additional file 1); particularly, sample 4 has been crystallized as both in keto form and enol form. All the above discussions clearly revealed the formation of the desired products. This method is very simple, fast and applicable to the ketones having the alkyl halogens, protecting groups like Boc and Cbz that were tolerated and proved to be useful in the synthesis of fused bicyclic and tricyclic pyrazolones efficiently using cyclic ketones. Since this method is successful for different ketones, it can also be useful for the synthesis of pharmaceutically important pyrazolones.

We have investigated the newly synthesized pyrazoles for their antibacterial activity against E. coli (ATTC-25922), S. aureus (ATTC-25923), P. aeruginosa (ATTC-27853) and K. pneumonia (recultured) bacterial strains by the disc diffusion method [57,58]. Results of these studies were given in Table 1 and compared with the standard ciprofloxacin. Most of the synthesized compounds exhibited very good bacterial activity; particularly, compounds 7, 13, 14, 23, 25 and 26 have shown very good inhibition against all the bacterial strains tested. Compounds 9 to 11, 13, 14, 19, 20 and 26 have shown a moderate to good inhibition against all the bacterial strains. Compounds 8 and 24 have poor bacterial activity. The SAR studies on these compounds revealed that the aliphatic substituents (either cyclic or acyclic) on the main cage increase their biological activities. On the other hand, compounds bearing the aromatic substituents and the fused ring systems decrease their activity. Halogen substitution in alkyl group also reduces their activity. Some of the tested compounds are equipotent or more potent than the standards used.

Newly synthesized pyrazoles were screened for their antifungal activity against A. flavus (NCIM no. 524), A. fumigates (NCIM no. 902), P. marneffei (recultured) and T. mentagrophytes (recultured) in DMSO by the serial plate dilution method [34-36]. Most of the tested compounds exhibited good fungicidal activities; particularly, compounds 10, 11, 19 and 25 were found to be highly potent to all the four fungi tested. Compounds 1 to 9, 13 to 15, 17, 20, 21, 23, 25 and 26 were shown to have good to moderate activity to all the fungi tested.

All the synthesized compounds 1 to 26 have been subjected to the docking studies against ACHN (human renal cell carcinoma), Panc-1 (human pancreatic adenocarcinoma) and HCT-116 (human colon cancer) and then subjected to WST-1 cytotoxicity assay. Among the 26 synthesized compounds, compounds 14, 20 and 4 are found to have least binding energy value and Z score value. These compounds are more stable ligand-receptor complex amongst other compounds. Compound 14 shows the best binding conformation with nf-κb (total energy = −91.9971 kcal/mol, Z score = −119). The best binding mode of compound 14 at the NF-κb binding site and the residues involved in the interaction, corresponding two-dimensional (2D) interaction models, hydrogen bonds and bond distance are shown in Figure 1. Compound 14 binds to the binding sites and forms three hydrogen bonds with NF-κb involved in pancreatic cancer. It can be seen in Figure 1 that nitrogen atoms of compound 14 formed a hydrogen bond with Pro-65 and Val115. In addition, Arg59 has one H bond with the bond distance of 3.91 Å. The binding pose and interaction mode of compound 14 are shown in Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Molecular docking result of compound 14. (a) The docked poses of compound 14 at the site of nuclear factor kappa b; target protein is shown in the surface model, and the ligand is shown in the stick model. (b) A close-up view of the docked pose of compound 14. (c) The amino acid residue interaction, hydrogen bond networks in the binding pocket and the distance (in Angstrom units) of bonds are shown.

The post-docking analysis of compound 18 has shown higher affinity with VGFR2 which has key role in renal cancer development (total energy = −104.9856 kcal/mol, Z score = −125.5). Compound 18 binds to the VGFR2 and forms one H bond interaction with Arg118 and Phe115 residues. The best binding pose of compound 18 in the VGFR2 and corresponding 2D interaction models, hydrogen bonds and bond distance are depicted in Figure 2. Docking analysis of compound 1 has shown the best conformation with PI3K (total energy = −119.541 kcal/mol, Z score = −125.5). The binding affinity of compound 1 towards PI3K is investigated in detail. On analysis of the interaction and position of compound 1 in the PI3K binding site, it is observed that five H bonds are found, and the amino acid residues Asp654, Gln846, ARG649 and Trp201 participated in the interaction. The surface of PI3K with compound 1 along with the main contact residues of PI3K is labelled, and hydrogen bond distances are shown in Figure 3.

Figure 2.

Molecular docking result of compound 18. (a) Binding pose of compound 18 in the vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2. (b) A close-up view of the binding pose of compound 18; protein structure is shown in the surface model, and the ligand is shown in the stick model. (c) H bond networks with protein residues are shown.

Figure 3.

Molecular docking result of compound 1. (a) Docked poses of compound 1 in human phosphoinositide 3-kinase binding site. (b) A close-up view of the docked pose of compound 1; protein structure is shown in the surface model, and the ligand is shown in the stick model (color by atom). (c) H bond networks and bond distance are shown.

In continuation of the docking analysis, the compounds 1 to 26 have been subjected to the cyctotoxicity studies. Towards this, a panel of three cancer cells representing multiple cancers of clinical relevance were obtained from ATCC, namely ACHN (human renal cell carcinoma), Panc-1 (human pancreatic adenocarcinoma) and HCT-116 (human colon cancer). Cells were maintained in DMEM containing 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum and kept in humidified 5% CO₂ incubator at 37°C. Logarithmically growing cells were plated at a density of 5 × 10³ cells/well in a 96-well tissue culture grade micro-plate and allowed to recover overnight. The cells were challenged with varying concentration of compounds for 48 h. Control cells received standard media containing dimethylsulfoxide vehicle at a concentration of 0.2%. After 48 h of incubation, cell toxicity was determined by the CCK-8 reagent (Dojindo Molecular Technologies, Inc.); (WST-1 [2-(2-methoxy-4-nitrophenyl)-3-(4-nitrophenyl)-5-(2,4-disulfophenyl)]-2H-tetrazolium, monosodium salt assay). In accordance with the manufacturer's instructions [36], 5 μL/well CCK-8 reagent was added, and plates were incubated for 2 h. Cytotoxicity of all the compounds have been determined by measuring the absorbance on Tecan Sapphire multi-fluorescence micro-plate reader (Tecan GmbH, Germany) at a wavelength of 450 nm corrected to 650 nm and normalized to controls. Each independent experiment was performed thrice and tabulated in Table 6. The compound 18 was found to be inhibitive against only ACHN (human renal cell carcinoma) cell lines. The compounds 1 and 10 were found to be inhibitive against HCT-116 (human colon cancer) cell lines. The compound 14 was found to be inhibitive against Panc-1 (human pancreatic adenocarcinoma) as well as HCT-116 (human colon cancer) cell lines. The docking poses of the compounds 1, 10, 14 and 18 reveals that these molecules are having either more or strong hydrogen bonding interactions with the target molecules which may be due to the presence of either O-alkyl or O-aryl or cyanide groups in it, and hence, these molecules are found to have better activity.

Experimental

General

All the NMR spectra were recorded using Bruker AMX 400 or Bruker DPX 300 instrument (Billerica, MA, USA) with 5-mm PABBO BB-1H tubes. ¹H NMR spectra were recorded using approximately 0.03 M solutions in d₆-DMSO at 300 or 400 MHz with tetramethylsilane (TMS) as internal reference. ¹³C NMR spectra were recorded using approximately 0.05 M solutions in d₆-DMSO at 75 or 100 MHz with TMS as internal reference. In many cases, pyrazolones were recorded in the enol form, whenever d₆-DMSO was used as solvent. Melting points were determined by Buchi B-545 apparatus (Golden Valley, MN, USA). LC-MS were obtained using Agilent 1200 series LC (Santa Clara, CA, USA) and MicromasszQ spectrometer (Manchester, UK).

All reagents were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA) and used as received. LiHMDS solutions were kept under nitrogen atmosphere after opening. Dry toluene, AcOH and EtOH were supplied by Spectrochem (Mumbai, India). All chemistry was performed under a nitrogen atmosphere using standard techniques. The chromatographic separations were performed over silica gel (230 to 400 mesh) using mixtures of EtOAc and methanol or EtOAc and hexane as eluent. Solvents were removed under reduced pressure on a rotovap. Organic extracts were dried with anhydrous Na₂SO₄. Visualization of spots on TLC plates was effected by UV illumination, exposure to iodine vapor and heating the plates dipped in KMnO₄ stain.

General procedure to synthesize pyrazolones from ketones

LiHMDS (1.0 M solution in toluene, 11 mmol) was added quickly to a solution of ketone (10 mmol in toluene (15 mL) using a syringe at 0°C under stirring and stirred at this temperature for 10 min; then, ethyl chloroformate (11 mmol) was added quickly. Reaction mixture was slowly (10 min) brought to room temperature and stirred for 10 min; then, 2 mL of acetic acid, 15 mL of ethanol and hydrazine hydrate (30 mmol) were added and refluxed for 15 min. Reaction mixture was concentrated to dryness under reduced pressure and re-dissolved in ethyl acetate, the organic layer was washed with saturated brine solution, dried over Na₂SO₄ and evaporated under reduced pressure. Crude product was purified by recrystallisation using ethanol.

3-(4-Methoxyphenyl)-1H-pyrazol-5(4H)-one (1)

Purified by recrystallisation using ethanol (white solid), m.p: 221.0°C to 222.3°C, ¹H NMR (400 MHz, d₆-DMSO) δ_H: 3.76 (s, 3H, methyl protons of -OCH₃), 5.77 (s, 1H, proton at C-4), 6.95 (d, J = 8.80 Hz, 2 Hz, 2H, aryl protons), 7.57 (dd, J = 6.88 Hz and 1.92 Hz, 2H, aryl protons), 9.70 (bs, 1H, -NH proton), 11.90 (bs, 1H, -OH proton); ¹³C NMR (100 MHz, d₆-DMSO): δ 55.19 (carbon at -OCH₃), 86.26 (C-3), 114.20, 123.15, 126.17, 143.09 (aryl carbons), 158.94 (C-4), 161.21 (C-5). MS calculated for C₁₀H₁₀N₂O₂: 190.19. Found: 189.0 (M-1).

3-(4-Chlorophenyl)-1H-pyrazol-5(4H)-one (2)

Purified by recrystallisation using ethanol (white solid), m.p: 243.5°C to 245.0°C, ¹H NMR (400 MHz, d₆-DMSO) δ_H: 5.93 (s, 1H, proton at C-4), 7.46 (d, J = 6.80 Hz, 2H, aryl protons), 7.69 (d, J = 8.40 Hz, 2H, aryl protons), 9.70 (bs, 1H, -NH proton), 12.15 (bs, 1H, -OH proton); ¹³C NMR (100 MHz, d₆-DMSO): δ 86.82 (C-4), 126.44, 128.78, 132.10 (aryl carbons), 142.0 (C-3), 160.70 (C-5). MS calculated for C₉H₇ClN₂O: 194.61. Found: 195.0 (M + 1 for Cl³⁵) and 197.0 (M + 3 for Cl³⁷).

3-(4-Fluorophenyl)-1H-pyrazol-5-(4H)-one (3)

Purified by recrystallisation using ethanol (white solid), m.p: 240.0°C to 241.5°C, ¹H NMR (400 MHz, d₆-DMSO) δ_H: 5.86 (s, 1H, proton at C-4), 7.23 (t, J = 8.72 Hz, 2H, aryl protons), 7.69 (dd, J = 8.30 and 7.23 Hz, 2H, aryl protons), 9.70 (bs, 1H, -NH proton), 12.00 (bs, 1H, -OH proton); ¹³C NMR (100 MHz, d₆-DMSO): δ 86.71 (C-4), 115.52, 115.74, 126.82, 126.74 (aryl carbons), 160.41 (C-4), 162.84 (C-5). MS calculated for C₉H₇FN₂O: 178.10. Found: 177.0 (M-1).

4-Methyl-3-phenyl-1H-pyrazol-5(4H)-one (4)

Purified by recrystallisation using ethanol (white solid), m.p: 218.5°C to 220.0°C, ¹H NMR (400 MHz, d₆-DMSO) δ_H: 1.99 (s, 3H, methyl protons at C-4), 7.34 (t, J = 7.20 Hz, 1H, para proton of aryl), 7.45 (t, J = 8.00 Hz, 2H, meta protons of aryl), 7.53 (d, J = 8.00 Hz, 2H, ortho protons of aryl), 9.50 (bs, 1H, -NH proton), 11.70 (bs, 1H, -OH proton); ¹³C NMR (100 MHz, d₆-DMSO): δ 7.66 (methyl carbon at C-4), 95.98 (C-4), 126.31, 127.49, 128.78, 131.15 (aryl carbons), 139.54 (C-3), 160.28 (C-5). MS calculated for C₁₀H₁₀N₂O: 174.19. Found: 173.0 (M-1).

4,5,6,7-Tetrahydro-2H-indazol-3(3aH)-one (5)

Purified by recrystallisation using ethanol (white solid), m.p: 286.0°C to 288.0°C, ¹H NMR (400 MHz, d₆-DMSO) δ_H: 1.66 to 1.59 (m, 4H, four protons of cyclohexane fused ring), 2.21 (t, J = 5.20 Hz, 2H, two protons of cyclohexane fused ring), 2.42 (t, J = 6.0 Hz, 2H, two protons of cyclohexane fused ring), 9.95 (bs, 2H); ¹³C NMR (100 MHz, d₆-DMSO): δ 19.35, 21.73, 22.74, 23.32 (carbons of fused cyclohexane part), 98.88 (C-3 of pyrazole ring), 140.19 (C-4 of pyrazole ring), 158.87 (C-5 of pyrazole ring). MS calculated for C₇H₁₀N₂O: 138.08. Found: 138.16 (M+).

3a,4,5,6,7,8-Hexahydrocyclohepta(e)pyrazol-3-(2H)-one (6)

Purified by recrystallisation using ethanol (white solid), m.p: 220.5°C to 221.8°C, ¹H NMR (400 MHz, d₆-DMSO) δ_H: 1.56 to 1.50 (m, 4H, four protons of fused cycloheptane), 1.71 (d, J = 5.52 Hz, 2H, two protons of fused cycloheptane), 2.29 (t, J = 5.60 Hz, 2H, two protons of fused cycloheptane), 2.50 (t, J = 3.28 Hz, 2H, two protons of fused cycloheptane), 9.20 (bs, 1H, -NH proton), 11.00 (bs, 1H, -OH proton); ¹³C NMR (100 MHz, d₆-DMSO): δ 23.04, 27.68, 29.36, 32.01 (carbons of fused cycloheptane ring), 102.81 (C-4) 143.81 (C-3 of pyrazole ring), 159.25 (C-5). MS calculated for C₈H₁₂N₂O: 152.19. Found: 153.0 (M + 1).

4,5,6,7,8,9-Hexahydro-2H-cycloocta(c)pyraol-3(3aH)-one (7)

Purified by recrystallisation using ethanol (white solid), m.p: 221.6°C to 228.8°C, ¹H NMR (400 MHz, d₆-DMSO) δ_H: 1.40 (m, 4H, protons of fused cyclooctane ring), 1.51 (m, 2H, protons of fused cyclooctane ring), 1.58 (m, 2H, protons of fused cyclooctane ring), 2.34 (t, J = 6.2 Hz, 2H, protons of fused cyclooctane ring), 2.54 (t, J = 6.2 Hz, 2H, protons of fused cyclooctane ring), 9.03 (bs, 1H, -NH proton), 11.00 (bs, 1H, -OH proton); ¹³C NMR (100 MHz, d₆-DMSO): δ 20.13, 24.27, 25.50, 25.76, 28.76, 28.94 (carbons of fused cyclooctane ring), 100.42 (C-4), 141.62 (C-3), 159.42 (C-5). MS calculated for C₉H₁₄N₂O: 166.20. Found: 167.0 (M + 1).

3-Cyclohexyl-1H-pyrazol-5(4H)-one (8)

Purified by recrystallisation using ethanol (white solid), m.p: 241.5°C to 243.0°C, ¹H NMR (400 MHz, d₆-DMSO) δ_H: 1.21 to 1.26 (m, 1H, proton of cyclohexyl ring), 1.29 to 1.34 (m, 4H, protons of cyclohexyl ring), 1.63 to 1.71 (m, 3H, protons of cyclohexyl ring), 1.84 to 1.90 (m, 2H, protons of cyclohexyl ring)), 2.44 to 2.50 (m, 1H, proton at C1′ of cyclohexyl ring), 5.20 (s, 1H, proton at C-4), 9.30 (bs, 1H, -NH proton), 11.00 (bs, 1H, -OH proton); ¹³C NMR (100 MHz, d₆-DMSO) δ: 25.97, 26.08, 32.66, 35.60 (carbons of cyclohexyl ring), 86.74 (C-4), 149.83 (C-3), 161.17 (C-5). MS calculated for C₉H₁₄N₂O: 166.22. Found: 166.9 (M+).

3-(3-Chloropropyl)-1H-pyrazol-5(4H)-one (9)

Purified by recrystallisation using ethanol (white solid), m.p: 155.8°C to 156.5°C, ¹H NMR (400 MHz, d₆-DMSO) δ_H: 2.00 to 1.93 (m, 2H, methylene protons at C2′ of propyl), 2.57 (t, J = 7.36 Hz, 2H, methylene protons at C1′ of propyl), 3.62 (t, 6.40 Hz, 2H, methylene protons at C3′ of propyl), 5.25 (s, 1H), 9.50 (bs, 1H, -NH proton), 11.20 (bs, 1H, -OH proton); ¹³C NMR (100 MHz, d₆-DMSO): δ 23.51 (C2′ of propyl), 37.18 (C1′ of propyl), 45.13 (C3′ of propyl), 88.56 (C-4), 143.39 (C-3), 161.20 (C-5). MS calculated for C₆H₉ClN₂O: 160.60. Found: 161.0 (M + 1 for Cl³⁵) and 163.60 (M + 3 for Cl³⁷).

7-Methoxy-4,5-dihydro-2H-benzo(g)indazol-23(3aH)-one (10)

Purified by recrystallisation using ethanol (white solid), m.p: 116.4°C to 118.2°C, ¹H NMR (400 MHz, d₆-DMSO) δ_H: 2.50 (t, J = 5.50 Hz, 2H, protons of cyclohexyl B ring), 2.82 (t, J = 5.6 Hz, 2H, protons of cyclohexyl B ring), 3.75 (s, 3H, protons of methoxy group), 6.80 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, 1H, aryl proton of C ring), 6.86 (s, 1H, aryl proton of C ring), 7.43 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, 1H, aryl proton of C ring), 9.50 (bs, 1H, -NH); ¹³C NMR (100 MHz, d₆-DMSO): δ 17.91, 30.04, 30.52 (carbons of cyclohexyl B ring), 55.52 (methoxy carbon), 97.83 (C-4), 112.20, 114.59, 114.81, 120.61, 122.61, 138.18, 139.82, 157.82 (C-3), 158.97 (C-5). MS calculated for C₁₂H₁₂N₂O₂: 216.23. Found: 215.0 (M-1).

3-(2,3-Dihydrobenzofuran-5-yl)-1H-pyrazol-5(4H)-one (11)

Purified by recrystallisation using ethanol (white solid), m.p: 237.5°C to 239.0°C, ¹H NMR (400 MHz, d₆-DMSO) δ_H: 3.19 (t, J = 8.70 Hz, 2H, protons of benzofuran ring), 4.54 (t, J = 8.70 Hz, 2H, protons of benzofuran ring), 5.74 (s, 1H, proton at C-4), 6.67 (d, J = 8.28 Hz, 1H, aryl proton of benzofuran ring), 7.38 (dd, J = 8.28 Hz, 1.82 Hz, 1H, aryl proton of benzofuran ring), 7.51 (s, 1H, aryl proton of benzofuran ring), 9.65 (bs, 1H, -NH proton), 11.85 (bs, 1H, -OH proton); ¹³C NMR (100 MHz, d₆-DMSO): δ 28.95 (C of benzofuran), 71.14 (C of benzofuran), 86.16 (C-3), 109.05, 121.84, 123.09, 124.77, 127.95 (carbons of benzofuran), 143.51 (C-3), 159.50 (carbon of benzofuran), 161.16 (C-5). MS calculated for C₁₁H₁₀N₂O₂: 202.20. Found: 203.0 (M + 1).

3-(Biphenyl-4-yl)-1H-pyrazol-5(4H)-one (12)

Purified by recrystallisation using ethanol (white solid), m.p: 236.5°C to 265.0°C, ¹H NMR (400 MHz, d₆-DMSO) δ_H: 5.94 (s, 1H, proton at C-4), 7.37 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H, aryl proton), 7.47 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H, aryl protons), 7.76 to 7.69 (m, 6H, aryl protons), 9.77 (bs, 1H, -NH proton), 12.13 (bs, 1H, -OH proton); ¹³C NMR (100 MHz, d₆-DMSO): δ 86.88 (C-4), 125.26, 126.51, 126.97, 127.54, 128.96 (aryl carbons), 139.25 (C-3), 139.50 (C-5). MS calculated for C₁₅H₁₀N₂O₂: 236.26. Found: 235.0 (M-1).

3-(Thiophen-2-yl)-1H-pyrazol-5(4H)-one (13)

Purified by recrystallisation using ethanol (white solid), m.p: 204.0°C to 205.0°C, ¹H NMR (400 MHz, d₆-DMSO) δ_H: 5.67 (s, 1H, proton at C-4), 7.07 (bs, 1H, proton of thiophenyl ring), 7.32 (bs, 1H, proton of thiophenyl ring), 7.42 (bs, 1H, proton of thiophenyl ring), 9.67 (bs, 1H, -NH), 12.05 (bs, 1H, -OH). MS calculated for C₇H₆N₂OS: 166.20. Found: 167.0 (M + 1).

3-(5-Oxo-4,5-dihydro-1H-pyrazol-3-yl)benzonitrile (14)

Purified by recrystallisation using ethanol (white solid). ¹H NMR (400 MHz, d₆-DMSO) δ_H: 6.02 (s, 1H, proton at C-4), 7.59 (t, J = 10.4 Hz, 1H, aryl proton), 7.73 (d, J = 10.4 Hz, 1H, aryl proton), 7.99 (d, J = 10.4, 1H, aryl proton), 8.12 (s, 1H, aryl proton), 10.00 (bs, 1H, -NH proton), 12.02 (bs, 1H, -OH proton). MS calculated for C₁₀H₇N₃O: 185.18. Found: 184.0 (M-1).

Ethyl 3-oxo-2,3,3a,4,6,7-hexahydropyrazolo[4,3-c]pyridine-5-caboxylate (15)

Purified by recrystallisation using ethanol (white solid), m.p: 212.5°C to 213. 8°C, ¹H NMR (400 MHz, d₆-DMSO) δ_H: 1.90 (t, J = 7.08 Hz, 3H, methyl of ethyl group), 2.50 (m, 2H, protons of ring B), 3.56 (t, J = 5.7 Hz, 2H, protons of ring B), 4.04 (q, J = 7.08 Hz, 2H, methylene of ethyl group), 4.18 (s, 2H, protons of ring B), 9.80 (bs, 1H, -NH proton), 11.30 (bs, 1H, -OH proton); ¹³C NMR (100 MHz, d₆-DMSO): δ 14.62 (methyl carbon of ethyl group), 21.62 (carbon of ring B), 21.92 (methylene carbon of ethyl group), 60.89, 96.06 (C-4 of pyrazole ring), 138.12, 155.08 (C-3 of pyrazole ring), 156.33 (C-5 of pyrazole ring). MS calculated for C₉H₁₃N₃O₃: 211.21. Found: 212.0 (M + 1).

Tert-butyl 3-oxo-2,3,3a,4,6,7-hexahydropyrazolo[4,3-c]pyridine-5-carboxylate (16)

Purified by recrystallisation using ethanol (white solid), m.p: 225.5°C to 227.5°C, ¹H NMR (400 MHz, d₆-DMSO) δ_H: 1.40 (s, 9H, methyl protons of Boc), 2.49 (t, q = 1.77 Hz, 2H, protons of ring B), 3.51 (t, J = 5.72 Hz, 2H, protons of ring B), 4.13 (s, 2H, protons of ring B); ¹³C NMR (100 MHz, d₆-DMSO): δ 21.75 (carbons of B ring), (28.08 methyl carbons of Boc group), 59.77 (carbon of B ring), 78.94 (quaternary carbon of Boc), 96.21 (C-4 of pyrazole ring), 138.24 (C-3 carbon of pyrazole ring), 154.19 (C-5 carbon of pyrazole ring), 156.37 (carbonyl carbon of Boc). MS calculated for C₁₁H₁₇N₃O₃: 239.27. Found: 239.8 (M+).

3-(2,5-Dimethylfuran-3-yl)-1H-pyrazol-5(4H)-one (17)

Purified by recrystallisation using ethanol (white solid), ¹H NMR (400 MHz, d₆-DMSO) δ_H: 2.21 (s, 3H, methyl proton of furan ring), 2.32 (s, 3H, methyl proton of furan ring), 5.51 (s, 1H, proton at C-4) 6.27 (s, 1H, proton of furan ring), 9.60 (bs, 1H, -NH proton), 11.62 (bs, 1H, -OH proton). MS calculated for C₉H₁₀N₂O₂: 178.18. Found: 179. 0 (M + 1).

Benzyl 3-oxo-2,3,3a,4,6,7-hexahydropyrazolo[4,3-c]pyridine-5-carboxylate (18)

Purified by recrystallisation using ethanol (white solid), m.p: 225.4°C to 226.1°C, ¹H NMR (400 MHz, d₆-DMSO) δ_H: 2.50 to 2.56 (m, 2H, protons of ring B), 3.61 (s, 2H, protons of ring B), 4.23 (d, J = 10.80 Hz, 2H, protons of ring B), 5.10 (s, 2H, protons of methylene of Cbz group), 7.38 to 7.30 (m, 5H, aryl protons of Cbz), 9.88 (bs, 1H, -NH proton), 11.16 (bs, 1H, -OH proton); ¹³C NMR (100 MHz, d₆-DMSO): δ 41.27, 42.77, 66.39 (carbons of ring B), 86.72 (C-4), 127.69, 127.01, 128.46 (aryl carbons), 136.90 (C-3), 157.72 (C-5). MS calculated for C₁₄H₁₅N₃O₃: 273.28. Found: 273.8 (M+).

5-Tert-butyl-4,5,6,7-tetrahydro-2H-indazol-3(3aH)-one (19)

Purified by recrystallisation using ethanol (white solid), m.p: 243.5°C to 244.8°C, ¹H NMR (400 MHz, d₆-DMSO) δ_H: 0.89 (s, 9H, protons of three methyl groups), 1.18 to 1.25 (m, 2H, protons of ring B), 1.85 to 1.92 (m, 2H, protons of ring B), 2.39 to 2.29 (m, 2H, protons of ring B), 2.55 (m, 1H, proton of ring B); ¹³C NMR (100 MHz, d₆-DMSO): δ 20.73 (carbons of methyl groups of tertiary group), 22.54, 24.48, 27.81, 27.85, 32.70, 45.50 (quaternary carbon of tertiary group), 99.42 (C-4 of pyrazole ring), 140.46 (C-3 of pyrazole ring), 158.88 (C-5 of pyrazole ring). MS calculated for C₁₁H₁₈N₂O: 194.21. Found: 194.8 (M+).

3-(Biphenyl-4-yl)-1-(4-fluorophenyl)-1H-pyrazol-5(4H)-one (20)

Purified by recrystallisation using ethanol (white solid), m.p: 156.2°C to 157.5°C, ¹H NMR (400 MHz, d₆-DMSO) δ_H: 6.07 (s, 1H at C-4), 7.31 to 7.40 (m, 3H, aryl protons), 7.48 (t, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H, aryl protons), 7.07 to 7.33 (m, 4H, aryl protons), 7.83 to 7.93 (m, 4H, aryl protons), 11.94 (bs, 1H, -OH proton at C-5); ¹³C NMR (100 MHz, d₆-DMSO): δ 85.57 (C-4), 116.01, 116.24, 123.52, 123.60, 126.10, 126.96, 127.25, 127.94, 129.42, 132.92, 135.74, 139.91, 140.17 (aryl carbons), 149.69 (C-3), 154.18, 159.05 (aryl carbons), 161.46 (C-5). MS calculated for C₂₁H₁₅FN₂O: 330.55. Found: 329.0 (M-1).

3-Ethyl-4-methyl-1H-pyrazol-5(4H)-one (21)

Purified by recrystallisation using ethanol (white solid), m.p: 233.4°C to 234.1°C, ¹H NMR (400 MHz, d₆-DMSO) δ_H: 1.07 (t, J = 7.64 Hz, 3H, methyl protons of ethyl group), 1.72 (s, 3H, methyl at C-4), 2.40 (q, J = 7.6 Hz, 2H, methylene protons of ethyl group), 9.50 (bs, 1H, -OH proton), 10.05 (bs, 1H, -OH proton); ¹³C NMR (100 MHz, d₆-DMSO): δ 11.34 (methyl carbon of ethyl group), 18.35 (methyl group at C-4), 22.99 (methylene carbon of ethyl group), 99.73 (C-4), 147.27 (C-3), 164.86 (C-5). MS calculated for C₆H₁₀N₂O: 126.15. Found: 128.0 (M + 2).

4-Ethyl-3-phenyl-1H-pyrazol-5(4H)-one (23)

Purified by recrystallisation using ethanol (white solid), m.p: 88.3°C to 89.1°C. ¹H NMR (400 MHz, d₆-DMSO) δ_H: 1.15 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 3H, protons of methyl group), 2.64 (q, J = 7.6 Hz, 2H, protons of methylene group), 7.17 to 7.13 (m, 1H), 7.41 to 7.32 (m, 3H), 10.00 (bs, 2H, -OH and -NH protons); ¹³C NMR (100 MHz, d₆-DMSO): δ 13.57 (methyl carbon of ethyl group), 19.10 (methylene carbon of ethyl group), 102.27 (C-4), 125.34 (ipso), 128.12 (ortho), 128.60 (meta), 133.88 (para), 142.49 (C-3), 159.20 (C-5). MS calculated for C₁₁H₁₂N₂O: 188.22. Found: 188.8 (M+).

3-Cyclohexyl-4-methyl-1H-pyrazol-5(4H)-one (24)

Purified by recrystallisation using ethanol (white solid), m.p: 205.4°C to 206.2°C. ¹H NMR (400 MHz, d₆-DMSO) δ_H: 1.25 to 1.28 (m, 1H, proton of cyclohexyl ring) 1.32 to 1.40 (m, 4H, protons of cyclohexyl ring), 1.66 to 1.76 (m, 8H, 5 protons of cyclohexyl ring and protons of methyl group), 2.40 to 2.50 (m, 1H, proton of cyclohexyl ring), 9.50 (bs, 1H, -NH proton) 10.52 (bs, 1H, -OH proton); ¹³C NMR (100 MHz, d₆-DMSO): δ 6.91 (carbon of methyl group), 26.01, 26.53, 31.91, 36.42 (carbons of cyclohexyl ring), 94.38 (C-4), 145.71 (C-3), 160.12 (C-5). MS calculated for C₁₀H₁₆N₂O₂: 180.24. Found: 180.8 (M+).

3-Cyclopropyl-1H-pyrazol-5(4H)-one (25)

Purified by recrystallisation using ethanol, m.p: 215.5°C to 216.8°C (white solid).¹H NMR (400 MHz, d₆-DMSO) δ_H: 0.58 to 0.55 (m, 2H, protons of cyclopropyl), 0.85 to 0.81 (m, 2H, protons of cyclopropyl), 1.75 to 1.68 (m, 1H, proton of cyclopropyl), 9.50 (bs, 1H, -NH proton), 11.52 (bs, 1H, -OH proton); ¹³C NMR (100 MHz, d₆-DMSO): δ 7.27 (C-1′ of cyclopropyl ring), 7.59 (C-2′, 3′ of cyclopropyl ring), 85.78 (C-4), 146.75 (C-3), 160.78 (C-5). MS calculated for C₆H₈N₂O: 124.14. Found: 124.9 (M+).

3-Isopropyl-1H-pyrazol-5(4H)-one (26)

Purified by recrystallisation using ethanol, m.p: 198.2°C to 199.4°C (white solid).¹H NMR (400 MHz, d₆-DMSO) δ_H: 1.13 (d, J = 6.92 Hz, 6H), 2.79 to 2.72 (m, 1H), 5.20 (s, 1H), 9.32 (bs, 1H, -NH proton), 11.50 (bs, 1H, -OH proton); ¹³C NMR (100 MHz, d₆-DMSO): δ 22.24 (carbon of two CH₃ of iso-propyl), 25.69 (methine carbon of iso-propyl), 86.22 (C-4), 150.39 (C-3), 160.75 (C-5). MS calculated for C₆H₁₀N₂O: 126.15. Found: 126.9 (M+).

Conclusions

The β-keto esters from ethyl chloroformate was successfully attempted, and the developed method is simple, fast and applicable to the ketones having the alkyl halogens, protecting groups like Boc and Cbz that were tolerated and proved to be useful in the synthesis of fused bicyclic and tricyclic pyrazolones efficiently using cyclic ketones. Since this method is successful for different ketones, it can be useful for the synthesis of pharmaceutically important pyrazolones also. All the new pyrazolones were subjected to antimicrobial, docking and cytotoxicity assay against ACHN (human renal cell carcinoma), Panc-1 (human pancreatic adenocarcinoma) and HCT-116 (human colon cancer) cell line. Most of them were found to be active against different bacterial and fungal strains tested, and some of them were found to have promising activity. The in silico and cytotoxicity studies reveal that compound 18 was found to be inhibitive against only ACHN (human renal cell carcinoma) cell lines. The compounds 1 and 10 were found to be inhibitive against HCT-116 (human colon cancer) cell lines. The compound 14 was found to be inhibitive against Panc-1 (human pancreatic adenocarcinoma) as well as HCT-116 (human colon cancer) cell lines, and hence, further investigations are in need in these promising lead molecules.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Supplementary Material

Additional file 1

Spectral evidences. A copy of original ¹H NMR and ¹³C NMR spectra of the compounds 1 to 26 has been included.

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to Syngene International Pvt. Ltd., Bengaluru for providing spectral facilities. They are also thankful to the VIT management for their generous support and facilities.