Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Drug Alcohol Depend. 2013 Mar 19;132(0):265–270. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2013.02.016

A Syndemic including Cigarette Smoking and Sexual Risk Behaviors among a Sample of MSM in Shanghai, China

F Yu 1, EJ Nehl 1, T Zheng 2, N He 1,3, CJ Berg 1, AF Lemieux 1,4,5, L Lin 1, A Tran 1, PS Sullivan 1, FY Wong 1,6
PMCID: PMC3726538  NIHMSID: NIHMS458484  PMID: 23517682

Abstract

Objectives

We explored possible correlates of cigarette smoking and their associations with levels of smoking among a sample of Chinese men who have sex with men (MSM). We also explored the syndemic associations of substance use and psychosocial problems on sexual risk behaviors.

Methods

Cross-sectional data collection from 404 MSM in Shanghai, China.

Results

MSM exhibit a high prevalence of smoking (66.3%). Both light and heavy smoking were associated with alcohol and drug use, depression, intimate partner violence, sexual attitudes, and gay identity (though the associations for light smokers were moderate compared to those for heavy smokers).

Conclusions

Our findings indicate the presence of a health syndemic among MSM, and suggest that smoking prevention and cessation and other substance abuse interventions should be integrated into efforts preventing sexual risk behaviors among MSM.

Keywords: Chinese MSM, Smoking, Health Syndemics, prevention, cessation

1. INTRODUCTION

Researchers in Western societies have found that men who have sex with men (MSM) and gay and bisexual men tend to experience more psychosocial problems such as depression, suicide, and intimate partner violence than their heterosexual counterparts (Herrick et al., 2011; Mustanski et al., 2007; Operario and Nemoto, 2010; Safren et al., 2010; Senn et al., 2010; Walkup et al., 2008). MSM also exhibit higher rates of cigarette smoking, alcohol abuse and drug use, and infection rates of HIV and other STIs (Colfax et al., 2004; Klein, 2011; Marshal et al., 2008; Rhodes et al., 1999; Van Tieu and Koblin, 2009; Walkup et al., 2008). Due to the multiple co-occurring biosocial issues that these sexual minority men face, researchers have argued that these MSM are experiencing a syndemic of health issues. Syndemic refers to the concentration within a specific population of two or more diseases that reinforce one another, ultimately giving rise to other health problems (Singer and Clair, 2003).

A variant of the syndemic framework is the “Minority Stress Theory” (Meyer, 1995, 2003), which posits that the stresses, including social discrimination against MSM, of being a minority are associated with adverse health outcomes, especially in the realm of mental health. Exposed to discrimination over time, these men are highly likely to experience stress, low self-esteem, and social isolation, all of which in turn compromise their health. Stall and colleagues have proposed a theory of “syndemic production” of health disparities among gay men in the urban United States, linking high rates of depression, substance use, and HIV/AIDS as intertwined epidemics among groups of gay men that arise from negative childhood or adolescent experiences associated with their emergent gay identities (Bruce and Harper, 2011; Friedman et al., 2008; Stall, 2008).

Western researchers have applied the syndemic framework to HIV research among MSM, finding considerable empirical support for a model in which co-occurring psychosocial problems such as substance use, depression, and intimate partner violence (IPV) are mutually reinforcing each other and together lower the health profile of gay men (Egan et al., 2011; Lee et al., 2009; Operario and Nemoto, 2010; Safren et al., 2010). For example, Storholm et al. found that young MSM (or YMSM) living in New York City were more likely to report cigarette smoking and that smoking was associated with using alcohol and a variety of illicit substances. In addition, YMSM who smoked cigarettes reported a greater number of casual sex partners and transactional sex partners than non-smokers (Storholm et al., 2011).

1.1 Cigarette Smoking in China

Globally, tobacco use is the second leading cause of death (Ezzati et al., 2002) and the leading preventable cause of disease, disability, and death (WHO, 2009). Cigarette smoking causes approximately five million deaths per year, accounting for one in ten deaths among adults worldwide (WHO, 2009). China is home to nearly one-third of all smokers worldwide (Yang et al., 1999) and is the leading producer and consumer of tobacco products (Lam et al., 1997; O’Connor et al., 2010). Evidence has shown that tobacco use in China significantly increases the risk of many diseases such as Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) and respiratory tuberculosis (Zhang and Cai, 2003), and vascular and heart diseases (Chen et al., 1997; Gu et al., 2009; He et al., 2005). Additionally, smoking is responsible for a high burden of many cancers including lung, esophagus, stomach, and liver cancers (Chen et al., 2003, 1997; Gan et al., 2007; Liu et al., 1998; Qiu and Chen, 2009; Wang et al., 2010, 2000; Yang et al., 1999; Zhang and Cai, 2003; Zhong et al., 1999). Currently, more than one third of cancer deaths in China are attributable to smoking, while the number of smoking attributable deaths has declined in the US (Rostron, 2012; Wang et al., 2010). Over one million annual deaths in China have been attributed to smoking, and estimated mortality will reach two million by the year 2025 (Liu et al., 1998; Yan, 2008). Besides its impact on health outcomes, smoking also increases the economic burden on the country. While the tobacco industry itself is profitable in China, the negative economic consequences caused by tobacco use are undeniable. The total economic cost of smoking in China increased from US$17.1 billion in 2003 to US$28.9 billion in 2008, accounting for 0.7% of China’s Gross Domestic Product and 3.0% of total national health expenditures (Yang et al., 2011).

Research in China has also shown that smoking is significantly related to education, occupation, income, and location (Yang et al., 1999). For example, prevalence among adult men is lowest among those with at least a college education (54.2%) and highest among those with no more than a primary school education (72.4%; Yang et al., 1999). In addition, more than 70% of Chinese smokers are farmers, factory or service workers, private company employees, self-employed, or members of the floating or itinerant population who lack a fixed residence (Yang et al., 1999). Other studies have found that smoking is more prevalent among lower-income populations, and that urban residents exhibit significantly lower rates of smoking and cigarette consumption (Anderson Johnson et al., 2006).

The most striking feature of Chinese smokers is that the vast majority of them are adult males. Smoking prevalence ranges from 52.4% to 64% among males over 15 years old (Anderson Johnson et al., 2006; Li et al., 2011; Shi et al., 2008; Wang, 2006; WHO, 2009; Zhang et al., 2011) versus 2.4% to 6.4% among females (Li et al., 2011; Shi et al., 2008; Wang, 2006; Zhang et al., 2011). Tobacco use also accounts for more than 50% of gender differences in life expectancy (Wang et al., 2010).

Among male smokers in China, certain sub-groups justify particular attention. One such sub-group are MSM. As indicated above, Western and international literature have consistently documented higher prevalence of smoking among MSM than their heterosexual counterparts (Stall et al., 1999; Tang et al., 2004). However, the reach of Chinese governmental health initiatives into the gay community remains limited due to continued social stigma and fear of experiencing discrimination, which discourages MSM from engaging health authorities (Daily, 2010). Only one study has assessed smoking and other substance use behaviors among a sample of MSM in Shanghai, China. This study found that smoking prevalence and cigarette consumption were higher among MSM than adult males in general (Berg et al., 2011), suggesting the need for further research into smoking among this population.

Guided by the syndemic framework and findings from previous research, in this study we aimed to (1) identify and describe the psychosocial correlates for cigarette smoking among a sample of MSM in China; (2) compare the associations of these correlates (e.g., alcohol and drug use, depression, IPV, sexual attitudes, and gay identity) on levels of smoking to examine the associations among these behavioral and psychosocial factors; and (3) explore the syndemic associations of substance use and psychosocial problems with sexual risks.

2. METHODS

2.1 Data Source

The data used were part of a larger study examining the characteristics of HIV/STIs, sexual risks, and health issues among MSM in Shanghai, China. Using a cross-sectional design, data were collected between February and April 2009 using respondent-driven sampling (RDS) during Phase I of the study (Abdul-Quader et al., 2006). Using RDS, a social network methodology used to estimate population characteristics, eight initial seeds (four “money boys” and four general MSM) were selected based upon their self-identifying as either a member of the “money boy” (i.e., MSM who sell sex to other men) or general MSM population. The seeds were then asked to recruit up to three peers each and received U.S. $10 for each successful recruit. The recruited peers themselves were then asked to recruit other participants using the same method. A payment of U.S.$40 to participants for completing the survey was commensurate with their efforts and did not constitute an excessive amount based on local standards. All participants were informed of the nature and purpose of the study, survey procedures, the sensitive nature of questions, and confidentiality parameters and then provided their written consent. Institutional review boards (IRB) in the U.S. and China approved all protocols and consent forms, and all forms and procedures underwent standard and rigorous translation and back-translation (Chinese-English-Chinese). Four hundred and four participants met the following criteria and were enrolled in the study: each (1) self-identified as a male; (2) was aged 18 or above; (3) was able to give verbal and written (in Mandarin) consent; and (4) had had sex (oral, anal, or both) with another man in the last 12 months. A de-identified dataset was used for data analysis.

2.2 Measures

2.2.1 Socio-demographic Characteristics

Participants were asked to report demographic characteristics such as date of birth, ethnicity (Han vs. other), occupation, education level (illiterate to middle school, high school or the equivalent, and college or more), marital status (married and other), monthly income (<1000 Yuan, 1000–2999 Yuan, 3000–4999 Yuan, and 5000 Yuan), location of legal residency (hukou) (Shanghai vs. other), and sexual orientation (openly gay or bisexual, closeted gay or bisexual, heterosexual or other). Subjects were also asked if they ever had had sexual or intimate contact with a woman, the age at which they experienced their first sexual contact with a man and woman (if applicable), and whether they ever had had sex for money.

2.2.2 Smoking Status and Level

All participants were asked if they had ever used cigarettes or tobacco and, if yes, how many cigarettes or tobacco products they had used on average per day during the past three months. A continuum including non-smokers, light smokers (those who smoked less than 10 cigarettes per day) and heavy smokers (those who smoked 10 or more cigarettes per day) was created for ease of interpretation.

2.2.3 Alcohol and Drug Use

Participants were asked if they had ever consumed any alcoholic drinks (e.g., beer, wine, and liquors) and, if yes, how many drinks they had consumed on average per day during the past three months. Responses were then coded into two levels: alcohol use and no alcohol use. Subjects were also asked if they had ever used any drugs (i.e., ecstasy, heroin, marijuana, opium, ice toxic, methamphetamine, cocaine, tranquilizers and stimulants) and, if yes, how many times they had used drugs on average per day during the past 3 months.

2.2.4 Depression

A short-form version of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) was used to screen for depressive symptoms (Poulin et al., 2005). Twelve items (e.g., “You had trouble keeping your mind on what you were doing.”) were used to assess depressive symptoms by asking participants to indicate the number of days in the past week during which they had experienced the stated emotion or exhibited the stated behavior. Participants were asked to respond using a four-point range from 0 (rarely or none of the time [less than one day in the past week]) to 3 (most or all of the time [5 to 7days in the past week]). The Cronbach’s Alpha of the short-form CES-D scale was 0.85. A higher score indicated more depressive symptoms for the participant. The sum score of the depression items was calculated for each subject and a dichotomous variable of depression was created: participants with a score higher than 10 were coded as depressive and those with a score of 10 or less were coded as normal.

2.2.5 Intimate Partner Violence

A scale for IPV was developed and used to screen for partner violence. Both verbal and physical violence were assessed. For example, participants were asked if their partners ever hit or threw something at them or if they were ever verbally threatened, and were asked to respond either “Yes” or “No” to these questions. The Cronbach’s Alpha of the IPV scale was 0.73. The total number of “Yes” responses yielded a sum score for IPV, and a higher score indicated greater exposure to IPV.

2.2.6 Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual Identity Scale

The Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual Identity Scale (LGBIS) was used to assess sexual orientation or gay identity. Participants were asked to rate 18 items such as “I prefer to keep my same-sex romantic relationships private” using a 7-point Likert format (1 = strongly disagree, 7 = strongly agree). The core domains of the scale cover internalized homonegativity, the need for acceptance and privacy, identity confusion, and feelings of superiority. The Cronbach’s Alpha of LGBIS was 0.62. A higher scale score indicated more comfort with one’s gay identity, suggesting that the participant was proud of being homosexual.

2.2.7 Sexual Attitudes

We assessed sexual attitudes using a scale of 23 questions covering three domains: permissiveness, birth control, and instrumentality. All items were rated on a 7-point Likert format (1 = disagree strongly, 7 = agree strongly). For example, participants were asked if they agreed with statements such as “Casual sex is acceptable.” The Cronbach’s Alpha of the scale was 0.79. The sum score of sexual attitudes was calculated and a higher score indicated a more open attitude about sex.

2.2.8 Sexual Risk Behaviors

Eleven questions were developed to assess lifetime sexual risk behaviors. The scale was developed using HIV public health literature to reflect dimensions of sexual behaviors that have been found to increase the possibility of STIs. For example, participants were asked to report if they ever had had unprotected sex with their main sex partner, a prostitute, or a casual partner. They were also asked if they ever had sex after drinking alcohol or using drugs, or had sex without a condom while under the influence of alcohol or drugs. All responses were coded dichotomously (0 = No and 1 = Yes) and the sum score (0–11) of the 11 items was calculated. The reliability of the scale was 0.62. A higher sum score for sexual risk behaviors indicated a greater number of risky sexual practices engaged in by the participant.

2.3 Analytic Strategies

Preliminary analyses were performed to assess the participants socio-demographic characteristics, stratified by cigarette smoking status (i.e., non-smoker, light smoker, or heavy smoker). Characteristics included age, hukou, education, income, sexual orientation, participant type (general MSM or “money boy”), and age at first sexual contact with a man and woman. We selected age, hukou, education, and income based on previously published associations (Anderson Johnson et al., 2006; Yang et al., 1999, 2001), and sexual orientation, participant type, and age at first sexual contact based on our selection of MSM as the target population. We used one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) for statistical testing on continuous variables and chi-squares on categorical variables. Subsequently, the psychosocial health problems found to be significantly associated with cigarette smoking were then entered into separate logistic regression models to explore their associations with cigarette smoking.

To assess syndemic effects, relationships between factors (substance use such as smoking, alcohol and drug use, and psychosocial conditions such as depression and IPV) and sexual risk behaviors were tested. First, a linear regression model was constructed to explore if a cluster of psychosocial conditions would exert a synergistic effect on sexual risks. Then, substance use was entered into the model to test if the seven predictors (smoking status, alcohol use, drug use, depression, sexual attitudes, IPV, and gay identity) worked together to produce a syndemic effect on sexual risk behaviors. SPSS 19 was used for data analysis.

3. RESULTS

We examined homophily (similarity) and heterophily (social distance) to explore recruitment patterns resulting from the RDS (e.g., seeds are theoretically more likely to recruit participants similar to themselves). Results indicated extremely high recruitment homophily and corresponding heterophily, i.e., almost 97% of the time money boys recruited other money boys, and over 95% of general MSM recruited fellow general MSM. Based on these results and the significant differences in personal demographics between money boys and general MSM, RDS weights were not used for subsequent analyses. Instead, we opted to treat these groups as separate comparison groups throughout the study. Table 1 summarizes the sample’s demographic characteristics. The average age of participants was 29.7 years. Most were Han Chinese (96%), were migrants to Shanghai (79.7%), had at least a high school education (63.2%), and had a monthly income between 1000 to 4999 Yuan (79.1%). The distribution of cigarette smoking varied by educational group (p = .001); for example, 35.3% of non-smokers, 19.4% of light smokers, and 15.2% of heavy smokers had at least a college education. Most participants were closeted gay or bisexual (79.5%), not married (85%), and about half of them identified as “money boys” (49.5%). The average age at first sexual contact with men was 19.9 years old, and 20.4 years with women.

Table 1.

Demographic Characteristics of 404 MSM by Cigarette Smoking Status Recruited by Respondent-Driven Sampling in Shanghai Men’s Study in Shanghai, China, 2008–2009

Characteristics Non- Smoker (n = 136) Light Smoker (n = 108) Heavy Smoker (n = 160) P-Value
Mean (SD)
Age (years) 29.4 (10.8) 28.2(9.6) 30.8(10.5) F(2) = 2.04, p = 0.13
Age at first sexual contact with men (years) 20.2(5.9) 19.1(5.3) 20.2(6.7) F(2)=1.26, p=0.29
Age at first sexual contact with women (years) 21.0(5.2) 19.9(4.0) 20.3(4.4) F(2)=1.39, p=0.25
n (%)
Ethnicity
 Han 133 (97.8) 101(95.3) 152(95.0) x2 (2) =1.71, p=0.43
 Other 3 (2.2) 5(4.7) 8(5.0)
Hukou
 Shanghai 31 (22.8) 15(13.9) 36(22.5) x2 (2)=3.75, p=0.15
 Other 105 (77.2) 93(86.1) 124(77.5)
Education Level
 Illiterate to Middle School 43 (31.6) 40(37.0) 65(41.1) x2 (4)=17.93, p =0.001
 High School or equivalent 45 (33.1) 47(43.5) 69(43.7)
 College or more 48 (35.3) 21(19.4) 24(15.2)
Income (Yuan)
 <1000 14 (10.3) 5(4.7) 6(3.8) x2 (6)=7.57, p=0.27
 1000–2999 61 (44.9) 56(52.3) 87(54.4)
 3000–4999 40 (29.4) 29(27.1) 46(28.8)
 ≥5000 21 (15.4) 17(15.9) 21(13.1)
Sexual Orientation
 Openly Gay/Bisexual 19 (14.0) 6(5.6) 24(15.0) x2 (4)=7.13, p=0.13
 Closeted Gay/Bisexual 108 (79.4) 90(83.3) 123(76.9)
 Other 9 (6.6) 12(11.1) 13(8.1)
Participant Type
  ‘Money Boy’ 60 (44.1) 63(58.3) 77(48.1) x2 (2)=5.07, p=0.08
 General MSM 76 (55.9) 45(41.7) 83(51.9)
Marital Status
 Married 24 (17.9) 11(10.3) 25(15.6) x2 (2)=2.81, p=0.25
 Other 110 (82.1) 96(89.7) 135(84.4)

Of the 404 participants, prevalence of smoking during the past 3 months was approximately 66.3%. One hundred and thirty-six participants were non-smokers, while 108 were categorized as light smokers and 160 as heavy smokers.

Table 2 presents the results of logistic regressions of demographics, alcohol use, drug use, and psychosocial behaviors on smoking. In our sample, smoking was not associated with age. Smoking was, however, significantly associated with having less than a college level education; participants with a high school or equivalent level of education were more likely to engage in smoking than those with a lower level of education. Compared to alcohol users, participants who had not consumed alcohol during the past three months were less likely to smoke. In particular, the results indicated similar associations for specific alcohol types such as beer, rice wine and Chinese wine. Drug use was also significantly related to smoking; participants who did not use drugs were also less likely to smoke (OR < 1). Also, more participants with depressive symptoms engaged in smoking. In our sample, however, smoking was not related to the extent of exposure to IPV.

Table 2.

Bivariate Logistic Regression Models: Associations Between Demographic, Behavioral, and Psychosocial Predictors by Smoker Type among 404 MSM Recruited by Respondent-Driven Sampling in Shanghai Men’s Study, Shanghai, China, 2008–2009

Predictors Heavy smoking Light smoking
OR (95% CI) OR (95% CI)
Age 1.01 (0.99, 1.04) 0.99 (0.96, 1.01)
Education Level
 College or more Reference Reference
 Illiterate to Middle School 3.02*** (1.62, 5.64) 2.13* (1.09, 4.15)
 High School or equivalent 3.07*** (1.65, 5.67) 2.39** (1.24, 4.60)
Consumed Alcohol in Past Three Months?
 Yes Reference Reference
 No 0.32* (0.13, 0.83) 0.34* (0.12, 0.92)
Consumed Beer in Past Three Months?
 Yes Reference Reference
 No 0.40*** (0.25, 0.65) 0.33*** (0.19, 0.57)
Consumed Rice Wine in Past Three Months?
 Yes Reference Reference
 No 0.39** (0.20, 0.73) 0.71 (0.34, 1.52)
Consumed Chinese Wine in Past Three Months?
 Yes Reference Reference
 No 0.42* (0.19, 0.95) 0.69 (0.27, 1.78)
Ever Used drugs?
 Yes Reference Reference
 No 0.36** (0.18, 0.72) 0.47* (0.22, 0.98)
Ever Used Ecstasy?
 Yes Reference Reference
 No 0.30* (0.11, 0.84) 0.42 (0.14, 1.30)
Depression?
 Yes Reference Reference
 No 0.54** (0.34, 0.86) 0.56* (0.34, 0.94)
Intimate Partner Violence 1.13 (0.95, 1.33) 1.01 (0.84, 1.23)
Sexual Attitudes 0.98*** (0.96, 0.99) 0.99 (0.98, 1.01)
Gay Identity 1.29 (0.94, 1.77) 1.98*** (1.37, 2.87)
*

Significant at an alpha level = 0.05.

**

Significant at an alpha level = 0.01.

***

Significant at an alpha level = 0.001.

Overall, the predictors exerted an effect in the same direction, though of varying magnitudes of effect on predicting different levels of smoking. That is, the effects on heavy smokers were generally more extreme (i.e., further from 1.00). For example, compared to participants with a college education or higher, those with a high school education were more likely to be light smokers (OR = 2.39, p < 0.05) and were even more likely to be heavy smokers (OR = 3.07, p < 0.001). Similarly, compared to drug users, participants who had never used drugs were less likely to be light smokers (OR = 0.47, p < 0.05) and were even less likely to be heavy smokers (OR = 0.36, p < 0.01). The effects on light smokers were moderate compared to those on heavy smokers, indicating a syndemic effect from these demographic, substance use, and psychosocial factors by the level of smoking.

There were significant correlations between substance use, psychosocial conditions, and sexual risk behaviors. The correlations indicated that sexual risks were significantly correlated with smoking (p < 0.01), alcohol use (p < 0.01), drug use (p < 0.01), sexual attitudes (p < 0.01), IPV (p < 0.01), and gay identity (LGBIS, p < 0.05). Depression, however, was not correlated with sexual risks in this sample. In the linear regression model predicting sexual risks in Table 3, the first-step regression included four psychosocial conditions to predict smoking status. Sexual attitudes (p<0.001), IPV (p < 0.001) and gay identity (p < 0.01) were statistically significant predictors of sexual risk behaviors. The second-step included psychosocial conditions and behavioral predictors. Smoking (p<0.05), alcohol (p<0.001), and drug use (p<0.001), sexual attitudes (p<0.001), IPV (p<0.001) and gay identity (p<0.01) were statistically significant predictors of sexual risk behaviors. Cigarette smoking, alcohol and drug use, and exposure to IPV significantly increased the odds of engaging in more sexual risk behaviors. In contrast, more open attitudes about sex and being more comfortable with one’s gay identity were associated with fewer sexual risk behaviors.

Table 3.

Linear Regression Models: Mental Health Conditions and Substance Use in Relation to Sexual Risk Behaviors among 404 MSM Recruited by Respondent-Driven Sampling in Shanghai Men’s Study, Shanghai, China, 2008–2009.

Predictors Lifetime Sexual Risk Behaviors
Beta Coefficient in Model 1 R2 in Model 1 Beta Coefficient in Model 2 R2 in Model 2
Depression 0.03 0.1 0.02 0.19
Sexual Attitudes −0.02*** −0.02***
Intimate Partner Violence 0.28*** 0.24***
Gay Identity (LGBIS) −0.44** −0.41**
Cigarette Smoking in Past Three Months 0.23*
Alcohol Use in Past Three Months 1.16***
Lifetime Drug Use 1.04***
*

Significant at an alpha level = 0.05

**

Significant at an alpha level = 0.0.1

***

Significant at an alpha level = 0.001

4. CONCLUSIONS

Findings from this study are consistent with previous studies from Western countries indicating a high prevalence of cigarette smoking among MSM. The strong association found between education level and smoking is consistent with previous research in China, suggesting the importance of health interventions for MSM smokers with lower education levels. Smokers were more depressed and more likely to use alcohol and drugs. Although we did not formally test for a dose-response effect, the point estimates for associations between psychosocial conditions and cigarette smoking suggest that heavy smokers might be more likely than light smokers to drink alcohol, use drugs, be more open about sex, and engage in sexual risk behaviors. Our results are consistent with the “Minority Stress Theory” that sexual minorities participate in more adverse health behaviors, possibly to cope with a stressful social environment. Further research should examine the impact of stress among Chinese MSM as a sexual minority group and explore additional correlates of sexual minority stress and adverse health behaviors.

Our results suggest that being more comfortable with gay identity is associated with smoking. It is possible that when a gay/bisexual man comes out in China, they may experience greater levels of social stigma, shame and fear of reprisal. Therefore, he may in turn be more likely to engage in risky behavior as a coping mechanism. Also, the “syndemic production” of health disparities among Shanghai gay men in our sample linked high rates of depression, substance use and HIV/AIDS as an intertwined epidemic. According to the syndemic theory, the combined effects of those health conditions may influence the sexual risk-taking behaviors of MSM. These findings suggest multiple opportunities for interventions to reduce HIV/AIDS risks and decrease health disparities among gay and bisexual men in China.

This study is one of the first to examine smoking prevalence by applying the syndemic theory to HIV research among MSM in China. With its adequate sample size, this study can serve as a building block for further investigation. However, since our study relies on self-reported measures of both exposure and outcome variables, results may be subject to measurement error or misclassification biases (Perez-Stable et al., 1992; Wagenknecht et al., 1992). In addition, the breadth of sexual risk behaviors in this study was limited to condom use and sex with casual sex partners or prostitutes, so that conclusions may not be generalizable to other sexual risks.

Finally, we did not weight the sample data to compensate for the over-sampling of participants who have larger network sizes and more recruitment paths (Semaan et al., 2002). In our sample, recruitment was very homogenous (with the exception of 7 people) by participant type, money boys by and large only recruited money boys and general MSM by and large only recruited general MSM. Our study sample is somewhat consistent with other MSM studies in China in terms of demographic characteristics (Choi et al., 2008; Wong et al., 2008). However, future studies should attempt to draw more representative samples of Chinese MSM.

Overall, our findings confirm that Chinese MSM exhibit a high prevalence of smoking, and their level of smoking may be influenced by multiple factors such as alcohol and drug use, depression, and IPV. The adverse behaviors and psychosocial conditions work together in a syndemic fashion to lower the sexual health status of MSM. Therefore, It is likely that a comprehensive behavioral intervention may be more effective if it addresses several syndemic problems (i.e., smoking, alcohol abuse and drug use, etc). However, further research is needed for a clear understanding of how these factors interrelate and affect sexual risk-taking behaviors among MSM.

Acknowledgments

Role of Funding Source

Funding for this study was provided by a grant from the Eunice Shriver National Institute on Child Health and Human Development (R01HD056956) to Frank Y. Wong (last author). Preparation of this study was supported in part by the Emory Center for AIDS Research (P30 AI050409) to both the second and last authors. The funders had no further role in study design; in the collection, analysis and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; or in the decision to submit the paper for publication.

Footnotes

Contributors

This paper was based in part on a master’s thesis of the first author co-chaired by Sullivan and Wong. Nehl served as a member on the thesis committee. Wong, Nehl, Zheng, and He are members of an ongoing study from which the data were drawn. Berg, Lin, Tran and Lemieux contributed to the interpretation of findings.

Conflict of Interest

No conflict declared

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

References

  1. Abdul-Quader AS, Heckathorn DD, Sabin K, Saidel T. Implementation and analysis of respondent driven sampling: lessons learned from the field. J Urban Health. 2006;83:i1–5. doi: 10.1007/s11524-006-9108-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Anderson Johnson C, Palmer PH, Chou CP, Pang Z, Zhou D, Dong L, Xiang H, Yang P, Xu H, Wang J, Fu X, Guo Q, Sun P, Ma H, Gallaher PE, Xie B, Lee L, Fang T, Unger JB. Tobacco use among youth and adults in Mainland China: the China Seven Cities Study. Public Health. 2006;120:1156–1169. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2006.07.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Berg CJ, Nehl EJ, Wong FY, He N, Huang ZJ, Ahluwalia JS, Zheng T. Prevalence and correlates of tobacco use among a sample of MSM in Shanghai, China. Nicotine Tob Res. 2011;13:22–28. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntq193. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bruce D, Harper GW. Operating without a safety net: gay male adolescents and emerging adults’ experiences of marginalization and migration, and implications for theory of syndemic production of health disparities. Health Educ Behav. 2011;38:367–378. doi: 10.1177/1090198110375911. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Chen ZM, Liu BQ, Boreham J, Wu YP, Chen JS, Peto R. Smoking and liver cancer in China: case-control comparison of 36,000 liver cancer deaths vs. 17,000 cirrhosis deaths. Intl J Cancer. 2003;107:106–112. doi: 10.1002/ijc.11342. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Chen ZM, Xu Z, Collins R, Li WX, Peto R. Early health effects of the emerging tobacco epidemic in China. A 16-year prospective study. JAMA. 1997;278:1500–1504. doi: 10.1001/jama.278.18.1500. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. China Daily. Include gays in the fight against HIV. 2010. [Google Scholar]
  8. Choi KH, Hudes ES, Steward WT. Social discrimination, concurrent sexual partnerships, and HIV risk among men who have sex with men in Shanghai, China. AIDS Behav. 2008;12:S71–77. doi: 10.1007/s10461-008-9394-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Colfax G, Vittinghoff E, Husnik MJ, McKirnan D, Buchbinder S, Koblin B, Celum C, Chesney M, Huang Y, Mayer K, Bozeman S, Judson FN, Bryant KJ, Coates TJ. Substance use and sexual risk: a participant- and episode-level analysis among a cohort of men who have sex with men. Am J Epidemiol. 2004;159:1002–1012. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwh135. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Egan JE, Frye V, Kurtz SP, Latkin C, Chen M, Tobin K, Yang C, Koblin BA. Migration, neighborhoods, and networks: approaches to understanding how urban environmental conditions affect syndemic adverse health outcomes among gay, bisexual and other men who have sex with men. AIDS Behav. 2011;15(Suppl 1):S35–50. doi: 10.1007/s10461-011-9902-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Ezzati M, Lopez AD, Rodgers A, Vander Hoorn S, Murray CJ. Selected major risk factors and global and regional burden of disease. Lancet. 2002;360:1347–1360. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)11403-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Friedman MS, Marshal MP, Stall R, Cheong J, Wright ER. Gay-related development, early abuse and adult health outcomes among gay males. AIDS Behav. 2008;12:891–902. doi: 10.1007/s10461-007-9319-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Gan Q, Smith KR, Hammond SK, Hu TW. Disease burden of adult lung cancer and ischaemic heart disease from passive tobacco smoking in China. Tob Control. 2007;16:417–422. doi: 10.1136/tc.2007.021477. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Gu D, Kelly TN, Wu X, Chen J, Samet JM, Huang JF, Zhu M, Chen JC, Chen CS, Duan X, Klag MJ, He J. Mortality attributable to smoking in China. New Engl J Med. 2009;360:150–159. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa0802902. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. He J, Gu D, Wu X, Reynolds K, Duan X, Yao C, Wang J, Chen CS, Chen J, Wildman RP, Klag MJ, Whelton PK. Major causes of death among men and women in China. New Engl J Med. 2005;353:1124–1134. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa050467. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Herrick AL, Lim SH, Wei C, Smith H, Guadamuz T, Friedman MS, Stall R. Resilience as an untapped resource in behavioral intervention design for gay men. AIDS Behav. 2011;15(Suppl 1):S25–29. doi: 10.1007/s10461-011-9895-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Klein H. Using a syndemics theory approach to study HIV risk taking in a population of men who use the internet to find partners for unprotected sex. Am J Men’s Health. 2011;5:466–476. doi: 10.1177/1557988311398472. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Lam TH, He Y, Li LS, He SF, Liang BQ. Mortality attributable to cigarette smoking in China. JAMA. 1997;278:1505–1508. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Lee JG, Griffin GK, Melvin CL. Tobacco use among sexual minorities in the USA, 1987 to May 2007: a systematic review. Tob Control. 2009;18:275–282. doi: 10.1136/tc.2008.028241. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Li Q, Hsia J, Yang G. Prevalence of smoking in China in 2010. New Eng J Med. 2011;364:2469–2470. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1102459. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Liu BQ, Peto R, Chen ZM, Boreham J, Wu YP, Li JY, Campbell TC, Chen JS. Emerging tobacco hazards in China: 1. Retrospective proportional mortality study of one million deaths. BMJ. 1998;317:1411–1422. doi: 10.1136/bmj.317.7170.1411. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Marshal MP, Friedman MS, Stall R, King KM, Miles J, Gold MA, Bukstein OG, Morse JQ. Sexual orientation and adolescent substance use: a meta-analysis and methodological review. Addiction. 2008;103:546–556. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2008.02149.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Meyer IH. Minority stress and mental health in gay men. J Health Soc Behav. 1995;36:38–56. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Meyer IH. Prejudice, social stress, and mental health in lesbian, gay, and bisexual populations: conceptual issues and research evidence. Psychol Bull. 2003;129:674–697. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.129.5.674. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Mustanski B, Garofalo R, Herrick A, Donenberg G. Psychosocial health problems increase risk for HIV among urban young men who have sex with men: preliminary evidence of a syndemic in need of attention. Ann Behav Med. 2007;34:37–45. doi: 10.1080/08836610701495268. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. O’Connor RJ, Li Q, Stephens WE, Hammond D, Elton-Marshall T, Cummings KM, Giovino GA, Fong GT. Cigarettes sold in China: design, emissions and metals. Tob Control. 2010;19(Suppl 2):i47–53. doi: 10.1136/tc.2009.030163. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Operario D, Nemoto T. HIV in transgender communities: syndemic dynamics and a need for multicomponent interventions. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2010;55(Suppl 2):S91–93. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0b013e3181fbc9ec. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Perez-Stable EJ, Marin G, Marin BV, Benowitz NL. Misclassification of smoking status by self-reported cigarette consumption. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1992;145:53–57. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm/145.1.53. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Poulin C, Hand D, Boudreau B. Validity of a 12-item version of the CES-D used in the National Longitudinal Study of Children and Youth. Chronic Dis Can. 2005;26:65–72. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Qiu H, Chen YF. Bibliometric analysis of nicotine research in China during the period of 1991 to 2007. Inhal Toxicol. 2009;21:965–971. doi: 10.1080/08958370802590507. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Rhodes F, Deren S, Wood MM, Shedlin MG, Carlson RG, Lambert EY, Kochems LM, Stark MJ, Falck RS, Wright-DeAguero L, Weir B, Cottler L, Rourke KM, Trotter RT., 2nd Understanding HIV risks of chronic drug-using men who have sex with men. AIDS Care. 1999;11:629–648. doi: 10.1080/09540129947550. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Rostron B. Smoking-attributable mortality by cause in the United States: revising the CDC’s cata and estimates. Nicotine Tob Res. 2012 doi: 10.1093/ntr/nts120. epub ahead of print. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Safren SA, Reisner SL, Herrick A, Mimiaga MJ, Stall RD. Mental health and HIV risk in men who have sex with men. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2010;55(Suppl 2):S74–77. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0b013e3181fbc939. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Semaan S, Lauby J, Liebman J. Street and network sampling in evaluation studies of HIV risk-reduction interventions. AIDS Rev. 2002;4:213–223. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Senn TE, Carey MP, Vanable PA. The intersection of violence, substance use, depression, and STDs: testing of a syndemic pattern among patients attending an urban STD clinic. J Natl Med Assoc. 2010;102:614–620. doi: 10.1016/s0027-9684(15)30639-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Shi J, Liu M, Zhang Q, Lu M, Quan H. Male and female adult population health status in China: a cross-sectional national survey. BMC Public Health. 2008;8:277. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-8-277. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Singer M, Clair S. Syndemics and public health: reconceptualizing disease in bio-social context. Med Anthro Q. 2003;17:423–441. doi: 10.1525/maq.2003.17.4.423. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Stall RD, Greenwood GL, Acree M, Paul J, Coates TJ. Cigarette smoking among gay and bisexual men. Am J Public Health. 1999;89:1875–1878. doi: 10.2105/ajph.89.12.1875. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Stall RFM, Catania JA. Interacting epidemics and gay men’s health: a theory of syndemic production among urban gay men. In: Wolitski RSR, Valdiserri RO, editors. Unequal Opportunity: Health Disparities Affecting Gay and Bisexual Men in the United States. Oxford University Press; New York, NY: 2008. pp. 251–274. [Google Scholar]
  40. Storholm ED, Halkitis PN, Siconolfi DE, Moeller RW. Cigarette smoking as part of a syndemic among young men who have sex with men ages 13–29 in New York City. J Urban Health. 2011;88:663–676. doi: 10.1007/s11524-011-9563-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Tang H, Greenwood GL, Cowling DW, Lloyd JC, Roeseler AG, Bal DG. Cigarette smoking among lesbians, gays, and bisexuals: how serious a problem? (United States) CCC. 2004;15:797–803. doi: 10.1023/B:CACO.0000043430.32410.69. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Van Tieu H, Koblin BA. HIV, alcohol, and noninjection drug use. Curr Opin HIV AIDS. 2009;4:314–318. doi: 10.1097/COH.0b013e32832aa902. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Wagenknecht LE, Burke GL, Perkins LL, Haley NJ, Friedman GD. Misclassification of smoking status in the CARDIA study: a comparison of self-report with serum cotinine levels. Am J Public Health. 1992;82:33–36. doi: 10.2105/ajph.82.1.33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Walkup J, Blank MB, Gonzalez JS, Safren S, Schwartz R, Brown L, Wilson I, Knowlton A, Lombard F, Grossman C, Lyda K, Schumacher JE. The impact of mental health and substance abuse factors on HIV prevention and treatment. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2008;47(Suppl 1):S15–19. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0b013e3181605b26. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Wang H. Tobacco control in China: the dilemma between economic development and health improvement. Salud publica de Mexico. 2006;48(Suppl 1):S140–147. doi: 10.1590/s0036-36342006000700017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Wang JB, Jiang Y, Wei WQ, Yang GH, Qiao YL, Boffetta P. Estimation of cancer incidence and mortality attributable to smoking in China. CCC. 2010;21:959–965. doi: 10.1007/s10552-010-9523-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Wang L, Lubin JH, Zhang SR, Metayer C, Xia Y, Brenner A, Shang B, Wang Z, Kleinerman RA. Lung cancer and environmental tobacco smoke in a non-industrial area of China. Intl J Cancer. 2000;88:139–145. doi: 10.1002/1097-0215(20001001)88:1<139::aid-ijc22>3.0.co;2-l. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. WHO. WHO Report on the Global Tobacco Epidemic, 2009: Implementing smoke-free environments. World Health Organization; Geneva: 2009. [Google Scholar]
  49. Wong FY, Huang ZJ, He N, Smith BD, Ding Y, Fu C, Young D. HIV risks among gay- and non-gay-identified migrant money boys in Shanghai, China. AIDS Care. 2008;20:170–180. doi: 10.1080/09540120701534707. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Yan L. Olympic games in China--a catalyst for smoke-free environments. Tob Control. 2008;17:217. doi: 10.1136/tc.2008.026526. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Yang G, Fan L, Tan J, Qi G, Zhang Y, Samet JM, Taylor CE, Becker K, Xu J. Smoking in China: findings of the 1996 National Prevalence Survey. JAMA. 1999;282:1247–1253. doi: 10.1001/jama.282.13.1247. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Yang G, Ma J, Chen A, Zhang Y, Samet JM, Taylor CE, Becker K. Smoking cessation in China: findings from the 1996 national prevalence survey. Tob Control. 2001;10:170–174. doi: 10.1136/tc.10.2.170. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Yang L, Sung HY, Mao Z, Hu TW, Rao K. Economic costs attributable to smoking in China: update and an 8-year comparison, 2000–2008. Tob Control. 2011;20:266–272. doi: 10.1136/tc.2010.042028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Zhang H, Cai B. The impact of tobacco on lung health in China. Respirology. 2003;8:17–21. doi: 10.1046/j.1440-1843.2003.00433.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Zhang J, Ou JX, Bai CX. Tobacco smoking in China: prevalence, disease burden, challenges and future strategies. Respirology. 2011;16:1165–1172. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1843.2011.02062.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Zhong L, Goldberg MS, Gao YT, Jin F. A case-control study of lung cancer and environmental tobacco smoke among nonsmoking women living in Shanghai, China. CCC. 1999;10:607–616. doi: 10.1023/a:1008962025001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES