Abstract
Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a destructive arthropathy with systemic manifestations, characterized by chronic synovial inflammation. Under the influence of the pro-inflammatory milieu synovial fibroblasts (SFs), the main effector cells in disease pathogenesis become activated and hyperplastic while releasing a number of signals that include pro-inflammatory factors and tissue remodeling enzymes. Activated RA SFs in mouse or human arthritic joints express significant quantities of autotaxin (ATX), a lysophospholipase D responsible for the majority of lysophosphatidic acid (LPA) production in the serum and inflamed sites. Conditional genetic ablation of ATX from SFs resulted in attenuation of disease symptoms in animal models, an effect attributed to diminished LPA signaling in the synovium, shown to activate SF effector functions. Here we show that administration of 1-bromo-3(S)-hydroxy-4-(palmitoyloxy)butyl-phosphonate (BrP-LPA), a metabolically stabilized analog of LPA and a dual function inhibitor of ATX and pan-antagonist of LPA receptors, attenuates collagen induced arthritis (CIA) development, thus validating the ATX/LPA axis as a novel therapeutic target in RA.
Introduction
Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a destructive arthropathy with a high prevalence, imposing a substantial socioeconomic burden [1], [2]. Disease management for RA relies on symptomatic treatments that have relatively limited efficacy, can exhibit side effects and fail to improve long-term prognosis [3], [4]. The etiology and pathogenesis of RA remain poorly understood; however, it is widely accepted that the development of the disease requires a series of both autoimmune and inflammatory processes, mediated by a complex interplay between different cell types orchestrated by a dynamic cytokine network [1], [5], [6].
RA pathogenesis is characterized by the symmetric, chronic inflammation of the joints, eventually leading to the destruction of cartilage and bone [1]. Inflammation is initially localized in the synovial membrane, a thin layer of synovial cells lining diarthroidal joints that becomes markedly thickened due to synovial cell proliferation and infiltration by inflammatory cells [1], [5], [6]. Synovial fibroblasts (SFs) are among the dominant cell types of the arthritic synovium that, under the influence of the inflammatory milieu become activated and hyperplastic, while releasing a number of effector signals that include pro-inflammatory factors and tissue remodeling enzymes. While their role in disease initiation and regulation remains under investigation, activated SFs are widely recognized as major players in the manifestation and perpetuation of the disease [7], [8].
Autotaxin (ATX, ENPP2) is a secreted glycoprotein widely present in biological fluids, including synovial fluid [9], [10], [11]. ATX is a member of the ectonucleotide pyrophosphatase-phosphodiesterase family of ectoenzymes (E-NPP) that hydrolyze phosphodiesterase bonds of various nucleotides and derivatives [12]. More importantly, ATX is a plasma lysophospholipase D that catalyzes the conversion of lysophosphatidylcholine (LPC) to lysophosphatidic acid (LPA) [13]. In turn, LPA is a phospholipid mediator produced in various conditions both in cells and in biological fluids [11], [14], that evokes growth-factor-like responses in almost all cell types, including cell growth, survival, differentiation and motility [11]. The large variety of LPA effector functions is attributed to at least six, G-protein coupled, LPA receptors (LPARs) with overlapping specificities and widespread distribution [15], [16], [17].
ATX was originally isolated as an autocrine motility factor from the supernatant of melanoma cells [18]. Since then, increased ATX expression has been detected in a large variety of cancers and transformed cell lines [9], [11]. Beyond the established role of ATX in carcinogenesis [19], [20], high levels of ATX expression have been observed in non-malignant, inflamed tissues, suggesting a possible involvement of ATX in chronic inflammatory disorders, including RA [10]. Conditional genetic ablation of ATX from SFs results to attenuation of disease symptoms in animal models of RA [21], an effect attributed to diminished LPA signaling in the synovium, which, in turn, has been shown to activate effector function of SFs [21], [22].
Soon after the discovery of the potential roles of ATX and LPA signaling in carcinogenesis, many ATX inhibitors and LPAR antagonists were developed [23], [24], [25]. L-histidine and other metal chelating agents (ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid and 1,10-phenanthroline) were the first reported in vitro ATX inhibitors, based on their properties to scavenge metal ions essential for ATX activity [26]. Next, the discovery of product inhibition of ATX by LPA and S1P [27] led to the development of lipid-based ATX inhibitors including thiophosphates [28], analogs of cyclic phosphatidic acid (cPA) [29] and α-bromomethylene phosphonates [30], [31]. Finally, screening of compound libraries has resulted in the discovery of a number of small molecule, potent ATX inhibitors such as the boronic acid HA155 [32] and PF-8380 [33]. On the other hand, several LPAR antagonists have been reported, classified as lipid molecules mainly derived from LPA or cPA (Vinpocentins, diacylglycerol pyrophosphate) or non-lipid molecules (ki16425, AM095) [25].
1-bromo-3(S)-hydroxy-4-(palmitoyloxy)butyl-phosphonate (BrP-LPA), is an α-halo-substituted phosphonate, a metabolically stabilized analog of LPA that acts as a dual function pan-antagonist of LPA receptors and inhibitor of the lysophospholipase D activity of ATX [30]. BrP-LPA was shown to inhibit the invasiveness of transformed NIH3T3 cells expressing ras and ATX by 40% and to decrease their chemotaxis by 23% [31]; to reduce breast cancer cell (MDA-MB-231) migration in vitro and to cause tumor regression in vivo [34]; to inhibit cell migration and invasiveness of A549 cell in vitro and to inhibit tumor growth and angiogenesis in an engineered three-dimensional non-small cell lung cancer xenograft model [35]; to block the trans-differentiation of peri-tumor tissue fibroblasts and the associated proliferation, migration and invasion of hepatocellular carcinoma cells [36]; to reduce human colon cancer cells (HCT-116) proliferation, migration and invasion in vitro and to reduce liver tumor weight and volume in vivo [37]; and to reduce lymphocyte trafficking in draining lymph nodes [38]. Finally, JGW-8, a mixed isomer version of BrP-LPA, was shown to reduce synovial fluid-induced synovial fibroblast migration in a wound-closing assay [22].
The ligand properties of BrP-LPA were previously evaluated with Ca++ mobilization assays for accessing the activation and inhibition of LPA1, LPA2 and LPA3 in RH7777 cells, and LPA4 expressed in CHO cells [30]. These cell lines have been extensively used for the characterization of LPA GPCR ligands as RH7777 cells are intrinsically unresponsive to LPA, and CHO cells show minimal endogenous responses to LPA unless transfected with LPA4 [39], [40], [41]. BrP-LPA was able to recognize and inhibit all four receptors at different specificities (LPA1: 1.5 μM, LPA2: 1.4 μM, LPA3: 1.2 μM, LPA4: 0.27 μM) [30], establishing it as pan-antagonist of LPA receptors.
In this report, we first characterized the potency of BrP-LPA on the inhibition of ATX in vitro and ex vivo utilizing natural LPC substrates. The full pharmacokinetic profile of BrP-LPA in vivo was also determined showing that BrP-LPA rises to its highest level of 8 μΜ (Cmax) one hour (tmax) post administration, accompanied by a parallel decrease in ATX activity levels (48% reduction) and LPA levels (82% reduction). Most importantly, intraperitoneal injections of BrP-LPA were able to prevent the arthritic symptoms in groups of mice undergoing the development of collagen induced arthritis (CIA), establishing the ATX/LPA axis as a novel therapeutic target in RA.
Materials and Methods
Animals
All mice were bred at the animal facilities of the Alexander Fleming Biomedical Sciences Research Center, under specific pathogen-free conditions. Mice were housed at 20–22°C, 55±5% humidity, and a 12-h light-dark cycle; water and food were given ad libitum. Mice were bred and maintained in their respective genetic backgrounds for more than ten generations. All experimentation was approved by the Institutional Animal Ethical Committee of Biomedical Sciences Research Centre Alexander Fleming (Re-Approval license No. 376), as well as by the Veterinary Service and Fishery Department of the local governmental prefecture. All efforts were made to minimize suffering during injections, and all surgery was performed in humanly sacrificed mice.
Collagen induced arthritis (CIA)
CIA in DBA/1 mice was induced by immunization with collagen type II emulsified in complete Freund's adjuvant essentially as previously described [42], [43]. Mice were assessed for disease clinical signs two to three times per week. Clinical signs of arthritis were determined using the following scoring system [43]: 0: no evidence of erythema and swelling; 1: erythema and mild swelling confined to the tarsals or ankle joint; 2: erythema and mild swelling extending from the ankle to the tarsals; 3: erythema and moderate swelling extending from the ankle to metatarsal joints; 4: erythema and severe swelling encompassing the ankle, foot and digits, or ankylosis of the limb. As previously suggested [43], results are presented as the number of arthritic limbs per mouse, as well as mean score per arthritic limb.
Histopathology and arthritic score
Paraffin-embedded joint tissue samples were sectioned and stained with hematoxylin and eosin as previously described [21], [44]. Arthritic histopathology in mice was assessed (in a blinded fashion from 3 independent examiners) using a semi-quantitative scoring system as previously described for CIA in a DBA/1 (H-2q) background. 0: no detectable pathology; 1: hyperplasia of the synovial membrane and presence of polymorphonuclear infiltrates – mild tendonitis may be present; 2: pannus and fibrous tissue formation and focal subchondrial bone erosion: 3: cartilage destruction and bone erosion in multiple foci; 4: extensive cartilage destruction and bone erosion- bone outline structure lost. Presented results refer to an average score of all four joints.
Reagents
The various LPA and LPC species [myristroyl- (14:0), palmitoyl- (16:0), stearoyl- (18:0), oleoyl- (18:1), and arachidoyl- (20:4)] and their internal standards (17:1 LPC, LPA) were procured from Avanti Polar Lipids Inc. (Alabaster, AL, USA). Recombinant ATX(β) enzyme was obtained from R&D (Minneapolis, MN, USA), SinoBiological Inc (Beijing, China) and Echelon (Salt Lake City, UT, USA). HPLC solvents (methanol, chloroform, hexane, isopropanol), fatty acid–free BSA, chicken collagen type II, choline chloride, 4-aminoantipyrene (4-AAP) and horseradish peroxidase were obtained from Sigma (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). Choline oxidase was from MP Biomedical (Santa Ana, CA, USA), TOOS reagent was from TCI Europe (Antwerp, Be), Amplex Red was from Invitrogen (Carlsbad, CA, USA) and FS-3 was from Echelon.
HPLC-MS/MS
BrP-LPA, LPA species (C14:0, C16:0, C18:0, C18:1 and C20:4) and LPC species (C14:0, C16:0, C18:0, C18:1 and C20:0) were measured in plasma with HPLC-ESI/MS/MS using RSLCnano system (Ultimate 3000) coupled in-line with an LTQ Orbitrap XL mass spectrometer (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). BrP-LPA and lipid (LPA, LPC) extraction from plasma was performed on ice according to the Folch method with minor modifications [45]. Plasma samples (50 ul) were mixed with 950 ul PBS prior to extraction and spiked with the internal standard mix (17:1 LPA/LPC). Samples were extracted under neutral conditions with 4 ml of ice-cold CHCl3/CH3OH (2/1, v/v) followed by 2 ml of PBS-saturated ice-cold CHCl3/CH3OH (2/1, v/v). Each extraction step was followed by a 60 s vortex and a 1 min centrifugation step in a bench-top clinical centrifuge in a cold room at 4°C at 3,000 rpm. The lower chloroform organic phases from both neutral extraction steps were pooled and kept for LPC measurement. The remained aqueous phase was chilled on ice for 10 min and extracted twice with ice-cold acidified with acetic acid CHCl3/CH3OH (2/1, v/v) as above. The lower organic phases were pooled, neutralized to pH 6–7 (checked with pH paper as above) on ice and kept for LPA, BrP-LPA measurements. The kept neutral lower organic phase of neutral extraction and the neutralized acidified lower organic phase were evaporated to dryness. The resulting residues were resuspended in 0.15 ml of isopropanol and after brief vortex mixing the solution was transferred to the auto sampler vial. Recovery of LPA species was between 60% and 95%. Recovery of BrP-LPA was 70% and the recovery of LPC species was between 80% and 100%. The Relative Standard Deviation (RSD) was less than 7% from the plasma fortified with three different concentrations (0.1, 0.5 and 1 μΜ) of LPAs, (0.1, 1 and 10 μΜ) of BrP-LPA and (0.5, 5 and 50 μΜ) of LPCs. Analysis was performed using a Phenomenex (Phenomenex, Torrance, CA, USA) Luna Silica column (2–250 mm, 5 μm particle size) using a binary gradient program consisting of isopropanol:hexane:100 mM NH4CO2H(aq) 58:40:2 (mobile phase A) and isopropanol:hexane:100 mM NH4CO2H(aq) 50:40:10 (mobile phase B). The mobile phase was delivered at a flow rate of 0.3 ml/min and the total run time was 50 min/sample. The analysis was performed with electrospray ionization in negative SIM (Single Ion Monitoring) mode for LPA species and BrP-LPA and in positive mode for LPC species (data dependent MS/MS). The resolution was 100 K providing high accuracy for lysophospholipid measurements. Data were collected and processed with the Xcalibur software (Thermo Scientific). The precursor ion mass was used for the quantification while lipid identity was confirmed by precursor ion fragmentation using collision induced dissociation (CID). The peak area ratios (lipid/internal standard) versus the molar ratios (lipid/internal standard) were plotted and fitted to a linear regression. The linear dynamic range of LPA species and BrP-LPA was between 0.01 μM and 10 μΜ.
TOOS Activity Assay
ATX/LysoPLD activity was assessed based on the amount of choline released from LPC with the use of TOOS (N-ethyl-N-(2-hydoroxy-3-sulfopropyl)-3-methylaniline) reagent. In this assay ATX-mediated LPC-liberated choline is oxidised by choline oxidase to betaine and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2). The latter in the presence of horseradish peroxidase reacts with TOOS and 4-aminoantipyrene (4-AAP) to form a pink quinoneimine dye measured at 555 nm [13].
Diluted plasma samples (100 fold dilution; final EDTA concentration 0.5 mM) or recombinant ATX protein (2 nM) were incubated with LPC in the presence of 100 mmol/l Tris–HCl/pH 9.0, 500 mmol/l NaCl, 5 mmol/l MgCl2, 5 mmol/l CaCl2, 60 μM CoCl2 and 0.05% Triton X-100 for 3 h at 37°C at a final volume of 100 μl. It should be noted that EDTA was used not only as an anticoagulant but also as an inhibitor of ATX activity ex vivo [46], in order to suppress artificial LPA production during blood withdrawal and plasma preparation [47]; this is because the same samples were used in phospholipid measurements. The inhibitory effect of EDTA is reversed in the enzymatic assay by the addition of 5 mM of each MgCl2 and CaCl2 as previously reported [26], as well as by the addition of cobalt ions that were shown to stimulate ATX activity [48].
The liberated choline was detected by adding 100 μl of a color mix containing 4-AAP and TOOS (0.3 mM), horseradish peroxidase (5.3 UnitmL−1) and choline oxidase (2 UnitmL−1). Absorbance was measured at 555 nm and data were analyzed using the statistical software package Prism 4.0 (Graphpad Software Inc, La Jolla, CA, USA). For each sample and control the absorbance was plotted against time and the slope (da/min) for the linear (steady-state) portion of each reaction profile was calculated. Absorbance units were converted to nmol of choline/min/ml by comparison with a choline standard curve or by use of the extinction coefficient for the quinoneimine dye according to the following equation:
Where Vt* is the total volume of reaction in ml (0.2 ml); Vs* is the volume of sample in ml; e is the millimolar extinction coefficient of quinoneimine dye under the assay conditions (e = e = 32.8 μmol/cm2); and 1/2: Factor based on the fact that 1 mol of hydrogen peroxide produces 1/2 mol of quinoneimine dye.
FS-3 ATX activity assay
Inhibition of ATX activity by BrP-LPA was determined using the cleavage of the ATX-specific fluorogenic substrate FS-3 (Echelon Biosciences, UT, USA). Assays were conducted in a final volume of 100 μl in the presence of 140 mM NaCl, 5 mM KCl, 1 mM MgCl2 and 50 mM Tris, pH 8.0 with the use of 1 µM FS-3, 2 nM ATX from Echelon and increasing concentrations of BrP-LPA. Reactions were brought up to 100 µl with ddH2O and were then incubated at 37°C in a Tecan Infinite 200 microplate reader (Tecan Trading AG, Switzerland) set to make fluorescence measurements every 1 min for a total period of 30 min. Autotaxin activity was quantified by measuring the rate of increase in fluorescence at 528 nm with excitation at 485 nm. At the end of the measurement, each data point was plotted on a graph of fluorescence versus time. A linear regression was fitted in the linear portion of the graph (3–20 min).
Amplex Red Activity Assay
BrP-LPA inhibition was also tested with the more sensitive reagent Amplex Red based on the Amplex™ Red PLD assay kit (Molecular Probes, Interchim, Montluçon, France) originally designed for the measurement of the PLD activity [46], [49]. All reactions were performed with purified ATX (2 nM) from Echelon at 37°C. The ability of ATX to cleave LPC was detected using a coupled assay that monitors the release of choline using Amplex Red (10 μΜ), choline oxidase (0.2 Units/ml) and horseradish peroxidise (2 Units/ml) The rate of fluorescence increase was measured in a fluorescence plate reader (Tecan Infinite 200 microplate reader from Tecan Trading AG, Switzerland) for up to 80 minutes; the fluorescence increase was linear during that time-frame for all cases. Rates were normalized to control reactions that contained all reaction components except for the test compound.
ATX Kinetic Assays
The biochemistry of lyso-PLD was assessed by following the kinetics data using a wide panel of different ATX substrates [FS-3, different LPC species (14:0, 16:0, 18:0, 18:1)], three different recombinant ATX proteins (R&D, Sino-Biological and Echelon) and three different ATX activity assays (FS-3, TOOS, Amplex Red). The ATX activity was measured at different substrate concentrations (typically from 1-1000 μM) in order to examine whether ATX follows Michaelis-Menten kinetics. The Michaelis constant (Km) was obtained by fitting the substrate dependence of V (ATX activity) to a rectangular hyperbola using the non-linear regression analysis of the statistical software package Prism 4.0 (GraphPad Software, Inc.). Km and Vmax were evaluated from the rectangular hyperbola curve with the use of GraphPad software.
In vitro Inhibition Assay
For in vitro inhibition measurements, BrP-LPA was dissolved in water as a stock solution (4 mM) and appropriate dilutions were made in water. The inhibition of ATX by BrP-LPA was measured employing 2 nM recombinant ATX, 50 μΜ LPC (14:0, 16:0, 18:0) and 0.01 to 100 μmol/L of BrP-LPA (final concentrations). The in vitro inhibition of ATX by BrP-LPA was evaluated with three different assays (FS-3, Amplex Red, and TOOS). To ensure that BrP-LPA did not interfere with the colouring agent or hydrogen peroxide that is generated during the colour forming reaction in Amplex Red and TOOS activity assay, samples with BrP-LPA were incubated with only choline and the colouring reagents were added subsequently. BrP-LPA was also tested for its ability to inhibit mouse plasma ATX activity. Diluted mouse plasma was used as the source of ATX and the analysis of inhibition was made with TOOS as the in vitro inhibition assay.
Inhibition Analysis
The inhibition model (competitive, noncompetitive, or mixed type inhibition) was evaluated by graphical analysis with Lineweaver–Burk double reciprocal plots (1/[velocity] versus 1/[substrate]) and Cornish-Bowden plot ([substrate]/[velocity] versus [Inhibitor]). These plots were generated by the measurement of ATX activity in the presence of different BrP-LPA concentrations (0–10 μΜ) and increased amounts of 16:0 LPC (100, 200, 400 μΜ). The inhibition constants (Ki) and IC50 values were determined using the mean values obtained from two independent experiments. The relative remaining ATX activity or LPA levels in the presence of the BrP-LPA was expressed as a percentage of the corresponding control value (ATX activity, LPA levels without inhibitor). The IC50 value was determined graphically by plotting the log concentration of BrP-LPA versus relative remaining ATX activity or LPA levels of each test sample using the sigmoid dose–response fitting method (Prism® software). The IC50 (concentration of BrP-LPA sufficient to inhibit ATX activity or diminish LPA levels by 50%) was calculated by the equation f = y0+a/(1+exp(-(x-x0)/b)) given by SigmaPlot 11.0 (Systat Software, Inc., San Jose, CA, USA).
Ki was calculated using the equation of Cheng and Prusoff: Ki = IC50/1+[S]/Km [50], where Ki is the binding affinity of the inhibitor, IC50 is the functional strength of the inhibitor, [S] is substrate concentration and Km is the concentration of substrate at which enzyme activity is half maximal. Whereas the IC50 value for a compound may vary between experiments depending on experimental conditions, Ki is an absolute value. Alternatively the Ki values were calculated graphically as follows: The velocity of ATX (v) was determined at two or more substrate concentrations and over a range of inhibitor concentrations (I). In a plot of 1/v against I, data for each substrate concentration fall on straight lines that intersect at I = −Ki and 1/v = 1/Vmax (competitive inhibition) and at I = −Ki and 1/v = [1−(Ki/Ki')]/Vmax (mixed type inhibition).
Inhibition of ATX Activity and LPA Production in Whole Blood ex vivo
Venous blood from wild type mouse was collected in EDTA tubes. Blood was incubated with BrP-LPA at different final concentrations (0–10 μM) in 96-well collection plates for 2 h at 37°C. The reaction was stopped by centrifugation at 1000 g for 10 min to pellet the cells, which has been reported to remove most platelets [51]. Plasma supernatant was kept for the measurement of ATX activity and LPA/LPC species with TOOS activity assay and HPLC/MS/MS respectively. IC50 values using ATX activity and LPA levels were determined graphically as described above.
Mouse Pharmacokinetics and in vivo Inhibition of ATX Activity and LPA Production
BrP-LPA was administered intraperitoneally (IP) at 10 mg/kg in water to 6–8 week old female mice. Control mice (n = 3) received only the vehicle (water). Blood samples were collected from each animal (n = 3 animals per time point) via a cardiac puncture at time points up to 16 hours post administration. Plasma was prepared by centrifugation of whole blood at 1000 g for 15 min at 4°C, and was stored frozen (−80°C) in siliconized tubes. Plasma samples were then analysed for plasma ATX activity and BrP-LPA/LPA/LPC levels with the TOOS activity assay and HPLC-MS/MS respectively. Maximum plasma concentrations (Cmax), their time of occurrence (Tmax) and half-life (t1/2) were both obtained directly from the acquired data.
Statistical Analysis
Statistical significance of all values, always in pair-wise comparisons with control values, was assessed with a paired Student's t test, following confirmation of normal distribution with SigmaPlot 11.0. p values <0.05(*), p<0.01 (**) and p<0.001 (***) were considered significant. For CIA clinical scores the Mann-Whitney rank sum test was used to determine the level of significance between means of groups.
Results and Discussion
BrP-LPA inhibits the ATX-mediated hydrolysis of natural LPC substrates in vitro
In addition to its antagonistic effect on LPA receptors, BrP-LPA was shown to inhibit the lysophospholipase D activity of ATX (94% inhibition at 10 μM) [30], using the substrate FS-3, a fluorogenic doubly labeled LPC analog, wherein the fluorophore is quenched through intramolecular energy transfer [52]. FS-3 has been used extensively for the discovery of novel ATX inhibitors [29], [33], [53], [54], [55]; however, FS-3 is an artificial ATX substrate that behaves very differently from LPC in terms of binding to ATX and saturation kinetics [56], [57]. Therefore, we sought to determine the ability of BrP-LPA to inhibit hydrolysis of natural LPC substrates by recombinant ATX (from Sinobiological Inc), by measuring the released choline in a colorimetric enzyme-coupled reaction utilising the TOOS assay.
The time course of ATX-dependent LPC (16:0) hydrolysis was found linear within the first 20 minutes (data not shown), so all subsequent analyses were performed at this time point. The hydrolysis rate (Vo) of LPC 16:0, 18:0 and 18:1 by ATX was found to depend hyperbolically on the LPC concentration and to follow Michaelis-Menten kinetics (Figure 1A, B, C). The Km for each substrate was then determined, as detailed in the Material and Methods section. ATX was found to have the highest affinity for 18:1 LPC (Km = 55 μM), followed by 16:0 LPC (Km = 60 μM) and 18:0 LPC (Km = 82 μM) (Table 1). Similar results in substrate affinity order were obtained with a different recombinant ATX protein (from R&D) (Fig. S1A, B and Table 1). Moreover, similar results were also obtained with yet another source of recombinant ATX (Echelon) and a different colorimetric assay (Amplex Red; Fig. S1C, D and Table 1). In comparison, the Km of ATX for FS-3 was found to be much lower than natural LPC substrates (Fig. S1E and Table 1), confirming previous studies suggesting that the modification of the choline moiety in FS-3 results in a much higher affinity and tighter binding than natural LPC substrates [55]. The Km of ATX for the different species of LPC was found to be in the range of 50–150 μΜ, in agreement with previously reported values [23], [32], [58], [59], [60], spanning the range of physiological LPC levels in plasma [61], [62], and well above the critical micelle concentration (CMC) of all LPC species used [63]. Moreover and as previously reported, our results indicate that ATX prefers unsaturated LPC species and that the length of the LPC acyl chain is crucial for the affinity of LPC with ATX [58], [64].
Table 1. Kinetic parameters of in vitro LPC hydrolysis by recombinant ATX and inhibition constants of BrP-LPA.
LPC species | 16:0 | 18:0 | 18:1 | 14:0 | 18:0 | FS-3 |
Assay | TOOS | TOOS | TOOS | Amplex Red | Amplex Red | FS-3 |
Km (μΜ) | 60±11 90±21 * | 82±11 114±34 * | 55±10 | 80±9 | 116±13 | 2.3±0.4 |
IC50 (μΜ) | 0.7±0.2 | 0.9±0.1 | - | 1.6±0.1 | 1.1±0.1 | 0.4±0.03 |
[S] (μΜ) | 50 | 50 | - | 50 | 50 | 1 |
% Inhibition at 10 μΜ | 80% | 70% | - | 75% | 75% | 95% |
Ki (μΜ) | 0.7±0.1 | 0.6±0.11 | - | 1.0±0.4 | 0.8±0.2 | 0.3±0.1 |
The presented values are the means (±std) of two independent experiments.
Km values for recombinant ATX from R&D.
The ability of BrP-LPA to inhibit the lysoPLD activity of ATX was then evaluated using different LPC species as substrate, at concentrations [S] below the corresponding Km values. A clear dose response effect on ATX inhibition was observed for BrP-LPA for all LPC species (16:0, 18:0) tested (Fig. 1D, E). Similar results were obtained with the Amplex Red and FS-3 assays (Fig. S1F, G, H). IC50 and Ki values were then calculated as described in the Materials and Methods section and are reported in Table 1. Similar Ki values were obtained graphically from Dixon plots (data not shown). Moreover, the mode of inhibition was determined from the inhibitory effect of BrP-LPA on Km and Vmax values with 16:0 LPC as a substrate. BrP-LPA was found to inhibit ATX lysoPLD activity in a competitive manner from Cornish-Bowden (Fig. 1F) and Lineweaver-Burk (Fig. 1G) plots, as Vmax remained unchanged and Km increased at different BrP-LPA concentrations (Fig. 1H).
BrP-LPA inhibits ATX activity ex vivo
ATX is identical to plasma lysoPLD [13] and responsible for the majority of LPA production in plasma [65]. Therefore, BrP-LPA was then tested for its ability to inhibit endogenous ATX/lysoPLD activity in plasma ex vivo. Increasing amounts of BrP-LPA were added to mouse plasma ex vivo and ATX activity was measured with the TOOS assay utilizing different exogenous natural LPC substrates at final concentrations of 50 μM. In agreement with the in vitro ATX activity inhibition studies, BrP-LPA also inhibited plasma ATX/lysoPLD activity (Fig. 2A). Moreover, BrP-LPA mediated inhibition of exogenous-LPC hydrolysis by ATX appeared to be more potent when low affinity LPC species were used (18:0>16:0>14:0; Table 2). Next, the ability of BrP-LPA to inhibit the hydrolysis of endogenous LPC species in whole blood ex vivo was examined. A direct correspondence of added and recovered BrP-LPA was observed (Fig. 2B), thus corroborating the experimental procedures. The effect of BrP-LPA on ATX activity was found to be dose-dependent with an IC50 of 600 nM (Fig. 2C).
Table 2. Inhibition constants as measured by dose-response curves obtained by residual percent activity of plasma ATX/LysoPLD (TOOS activity assay) after the addition of increasing amounts of BrP-LPA (0.01–100 μM) in the presence of different exogenous LPC species.
14:0 LPC | 16:0 LPC | 18:0 LPC | |
IC50 (μΜ) | >10 | 2.9±0.3 | <0.1 |
[S] (μΜ) | 50 | 50 | 50 |
% Inhibition at 10 μΜ | 28% | 58% | 70% |
The presented values are the means (±std) of two independent experiments.
In the same experiments no significant changes were observed in the endogenous LPC levels upon the addition of BrP-LPA (Fig. 2D). This is consistent with the unchanged radiolabeled LPC levels upon the addition of the potent, boronic-acid based, ATX inhibitor ex vivo [32], and confirms that ATX inhibition does not appreciably affect the large pool of plasma LPC. In agreement, heterozygous, complete knock out (hKO) mice expressing 50% of ATX did not present with increased LPC levels (data not shown and [66]). On the other hand and most importantly, reducing ATX activity ex vivo with BrP-LPA resulted in lower LPA levels, with the highest potency observed at 10 μM, reaching 86% reduction of total LPA levels and 97% reduction of 18:0 LPA levels (Fig. 2E, F). The effect of BrP-LPA on the levels of the most abundant LPA species (18:0>20:4>16:0>18:1) [67], [68] was found to be dose-dependent (Fig. 2F), while BrP-LPA inhibited more potently the production of 18:0 LPA (IC50 = 300 nM) followed by 20:4 LPA (IC50 = 559 nM), 16:0 LPA (IC50 = 1340 nM) and 18:1 LPA (IC50 = 1520 nM).
BrP-LPA inhibits ATX activity in vivo
To investigate how BrP-LPA affects plasma ATX activity and LPA levels in vivo, we next administered BrP-LPA (10 mg/kg) or vehicle alone as a single intra-peritoneal bolus injection to groups of mice. The levels of BrP-LPA, ATX activity, LPA and LPC were then determined in plasma 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8 and 16 h post injection. The pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis of BrP-LPA shows that it rose to its highest level of 8 μΜ (Cmax) at 1 h (tmax) post-administration and declined rapidly (t1/2 = 50 min, Cmin = 0.15 μM at 16 h) (Fig. 3A). The pharmacodynamic (PD) effect of BrP-LPA was measured as decreasing ATX activity and LPA levels in plasma: BrP-LPA reduced ATX activity (48%; Fig. 3B) as well as total LPA (82%; Fig. 3C) levels 1 hour post administration, where it exhibited its maximum inhibitory effect. Sixteen hours post administration ATX activity returned near baseline (92% of initial activity; Fig. 3B) while LPA levels returned at 60–70% of normal initial levels (Fig. 3C, D). BrP-LPA inhibited the production of all LPA species tested except from 14:0 LPA (Fig. 3D), possibly due to the high affinity of 14:0 LPC for ATX. As expected from the low ex vivo IC50 values, the inhibitory effect of BrP-LPA on 18:0/20:4 LPA production was longer lasting than for other LPA species. LPC levels remain unchanged as expected from the ex vivo experiments (Fig. 3E).
BrP-LPA attenuates collagen induced arthritis
ATX levels have been found to be elevated in the synovial fluids of RA patients, as well as in joint tissues and sera of both RA patients and arthritic models [21]. Moreover, ATX has been shown to be predominantly expressed and secreted from arthritic SFs, both in human patients and mouse models [21]. ATX expression from SFs was shown to be induced by TNF [21], the major pro-inflammatory factor driving RA development, which has also been shown to induce NF-κB-mediated ATX expression in hepatocytes [69], suggesting that ATX induction in arthritic SFs is a downstream event of exacerbated TNF signaling in the synovium. Conditional genetic ablation of ATX from SFs results in attenuation of disease symptoms in animal models of RA [21] establishing ATX as a novel player in the pathogenesis of RA.
ATX induction in the synovium and other inflammatory sites is likely to stimulate local LPA production and its autocrine and paracrine effects. This hypothesis was tested in a rat air pouch model, where potent ATX inhibition provided >95% reduction in air pouch LPA, indicating ATX as the major source of LPA at inflammatory sites [33]. Mouse SFs have been shown to express all five major LPARs (1–5) [21], while human SFs were reported to express LPARs 1–3 [70], [71]. LPA has been shown to stimulate SFs actin cytoskeleton rearrangement [21], a pathological determinant of RA [44], in accordance with the reported functions of LPA in fibroblasts [72]. Moreover, LPA has been shown to stimulate SF proliferation, adhesion, migration, cytokine and MMP production [21], all characteristics of the aggressive behavior of arthritic SFs [44], [73], [74]. The effects of LPA in SF activation have been shown to be dependent on G-protein and MAPK signaling and to synergize with TNF in SF activation [21]. LPA (together with PDGF) has been reported to mediate migration in a tenascin-C substratum, shown to be essential for maintaining inflammation in arthritic joints [75]. LPA is also known for altering cell-to-cell contacts [11], which have been found to be crucial for RA pathogenesis [76]. Moreover and beyond the effects of LPA to stromal cells, LPA has been shown to stimulate polarization, motility and transendothelial migration of naive T-cells [77], suggesting that LPA can also actively modulate lymphocyte homing. Therefore, in the context of disease pathogenesis, LPA stimulates a number of inflammatory pathways and SF effector functions necessary for RA development.
To examine the therapeutic potential of targeting the ATX/LPA axis in RA, BrP-LPA was injected intraperitoneally twice a week (following immunization boost; Fig. 4A), in groups of mice undergoing the development of collagen induced arthritis (CIA). The simultaneous pharmacological inhibition of ATX and antagonism of LPA receptors by BrP-LPA resulted in the development of arthritis in significantly fewer mice (Fig. 4B), as well as to reduced severity per arthritic limb (Fig. 4C). Histopathological analysis of the joints indicated marked decreased inflammation and synovial hyperplasia (Fig. 4D, E).
Importantly, this dual activity pharmacological agent showed no appreciable alternation of gross physiology (data not shown), indicating the absence of systemic side effects. Moreover, BrP-LPA administration did not interfere with the levels of anti-collagen antibodies (Fig. 4F). It has been previously reported that no significant differences in LPA levels in arthritic, ATX-overexpressing joints were detected [21], most likely due to the rapid LPA turnover [32] and the possible local delivery to its receptors by cell bound ATX [64]. Likewise, no changes in LPA (or LPC) levels were detected, in plasma or joint tissue of treated mice at the end of the monitoring period (three days after the last injection; data not shown).
Similar therapeutic results were also obtained when the BrP-LPA injection dosing regimen was increased to three times per week as well as to daily dosing (data not shown); however, the lower, biweekly dosage scheme was generally employed as it has been previously reported to be effective in vivo in an orthotopic breast cancer xenograft model [34]. Since biweekly injections of BrP-LPA were able to prevent the arthritic symptoms despite its PK profile, it appears that pulsatile inhibition of the local ATX/LPA axis is sufficient for disease management. Moreover, the metabolically stabilized α-halo phosphonate nature of BrP-LPA suggests that BrP-LPA may have longer drug-residency times. Indeed, BrP-LPA levels were found to persist for longer in joint tissue, as opposed to liver tissue and plasma (data not shown).
It was recently reported that pharmacological antagonism of LPA receptors 1 and 3 with ki16425 [78], previously shown to inhibit LPA-mediated COX-2 expression from SFs [70], resulted in a reduction of arthritis severity in the K/BxN serum transfer RA model [79] despite its very short half-life [80], suggesting that antagonism of LPA receptors, one of the properties of BrP-LPA, can be therapeutic. On the other hand, pharmacological potent ATX inhibition with GWJ-A-23 [81] during CIA development, although exhibiting clear therapeutic effects, was associated with severe side effects resulting in increased lethality (data not shown). GWJ-A-23 is an a-substituted phosphonate analog of S32826 [82] with increased solubility recently shown to attenuate ATX-driven pulmonary inflammation and fibrosis without exhibiting any side effects [83]. However, treatment with GWJ-A-23 during CIA was twice as long, urging caution (at least in the context of this animal model) on the potential side effects of long-term, potent ATX inhibition. On-going genetic studies of inducible ATX ablation in adult mice is expected to identify any pathological symptoms associated with potent (>>50%) ATX inhibition and investigate the appropriateness of ATX as a therapeutic target.
The exact mode of action of BrP-LPA, moderate ATX inhibition and/or LPA receptor antagonism or both (or other undetermined off site effects), in the context of disease pathogenesis remains to be elucidated. Nonetheless, the future commercialization of novel, potent specific inhibitors for ATX and antagonists for LPA receptors [33], [84] would undoubtedly aid in fine tuning the well-established therapeutic potential of targeting the ATX/LPA axis in RA and other inflammatory disorders.
Supporting Information
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank H. Zhang for the BrP-LPA inhibitor, Z. Zhao and Y. Xu for initial LC/MS measurements, as well as Y. Sotsios and N. Karagianni for expert advice.
Funding Statement
This work was supported by the European Commission LSHG-CT-2005-005203 grant to VA. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
References
- 1. McInnes IB, Schett G (2011) The pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis. N Engl J Med 365: 2205–2219. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Scott DL, Wolfe F, Huizinga TW (2010) Rheumatoid arthritis. Lancet 376: 1094–1108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Strand V, Kimberly R, Isaacs JD (2007) Biologic therapies in rheumatology: lessons learned, future directions. Nat Rev Drug Discov 6: 75–92. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. van Vollenhoven RF (2009) Treatment of rheumatoid arthritis: state of the art 2009. Nat Rev Rheumatol 5: 531–541. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. McInnes IB, Schett G (2007) Cytokines in the pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis. Nat Rev Immunol 7: 429–442. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Muller-Ladner U, Pap T, Gay RE, Neidhart M, Gay S (2005) Mechanisms of disease: the molecular and cellular basis of joint destruction in rheumatoid arthritis. Nat Clin Pract Rheumatol 1: 102–110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Muller-Ladner U, Ospelt C, Gay S, Distler O, Pap T (2007) Cells of the synovium in rheumatoid arthritis. Synovial fibroblasts. Arthritis Res Ther 9: 223. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Bottini N, Firestein GS (2012) Duality of fibroblast-like synoviocytes in RA: passive responders and imprinted aggressors. Nat Rev Rheumatol 9: 24–33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Boutin JA, Ferry G (2009) Autotaxin. Cell Mol Life Sci 66: 3009–3021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Sevastou I, Kaffe E, Mouratis MA, Aidinis V (2013) Lysoglycerophospholipids in chronic inflammatory disorders: The PLA(2)/LPC and ATX/LPA axes. Biochimica et biophysica acta 1831: 42–60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. van Meeteren LA, Moolenaar WH (2007) Regulation and biological activities of the autotaxin-LPA axis. Prog Lipid Res 46: 145–160. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Stefan C, Jansen S, Bollen M (2005) NPP-type ectophosphodiesterases: unity in diversity. Trends Biochem Sci 30: 542–550. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Umezu-Goto M, Kishi Y, Taira A, Hama K, Dohmae N, et al. (2002) Autotaxin has lysophospholipase D activity leading to tumor cell growth and motility by lysophosphatidic acid production. J Cell Biol 158: 227–233. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Aoki J (2004) Mechanisms of lysophosphatidic acid production. Semin Cell Dev Biol 15: 477–489. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Choi JW, Lee CW, Chun J (2008) Biological roles of lysophospholipid receptors revealed by genetic null mice: an update. Biochim Biophys Acta 1781: 531–539. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Ishii S, Noguchi K, Yanagida K (2009) Non-Edg family lysophosphatidic acid (LPA) receptors. Prostaglandins Other Lipid Mediat. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 17. Lin ME, Herr DR, Chun J (2010) Lysophosphatidic acid (LPA) receptors: signaling properties and disease relevance. Prostaglandins Other Lipid Mediat 91: 130–138. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Stracke ML, Krutzsch HC, Unsworth EJ, Arestad A, Cioce V, et al. (1992) Identification, purification, and partial sequence analysis of autotaxin, a novel motility-stimulating protein. J Biol Chem 267: 2524–2529. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Houben AJ, Moolenaar WH (2011) Autotaxin and LPA receptor signaling in cancer. Cancer Metastasis Rev 30: 557–565. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Liu S, Murph M, Panupinthu N, Mills GB (2009) ATX-LPA receptor axis in inflammation and cancer. Cell Cycle 8: 3695–3701. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Nikitopoulou I, Oikonomou N, Karouzakis E, Sevastou I, Nikolaidou-Katsaridou N, et al. (2012) Autotaxin expression from synovial fibroblasts is essential for the pathogenesis of modeled arthritis. J Exp Med 209: 925–933. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Zhao C, Fernandes MJ, Prestwich GD, Turgeon M, Di Battista J, et al. (2008) Regulation of lysophosphatidic acid receptor expression and function in human synoviocytes: implications for rheumatoid arthritis? Molecular Pharmacology 73: 587–600. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Albers HM, Ovaa H (2012) Chemical Evolution of Autotaxin Inhibitors. Chem Rev. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 24. Tigyi G (2010) Aiming drug discovery at lysophosphatidic acid targets. Br J Pharmacol 161: 241–270. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Im DS (2010) Pharmacological tools for lysophospholipid GPCRs: development of agonists and antagonists for LPA and S1P receptors. Acta Pharmacol Sin 31: 1213–1222. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Clair T, Koh E, Ptaszynska M, Bandle R, Liotta L, et al. (2005) L-histidine inhibits production of lysophosphatidic acid by the tumor-associated cytokine, autotaxin. Lipids in Health and Disease 4: 5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. van Meeteren LA, Ruurs P, Christodoulou E, Goding JW, Takakusa H, et al. (2005) Inhibition of Autotaxin by Lysophosphatidic Acid and Sphingosine 1-Phosphate. J Biol Chem 280: 21155–21161. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Gududuru V, Zeng K, Tsukahara R, Makarova N, Fujiwara Y, et al. (2006) Identification of Darmstoff analogs as selective agonists and antagonists of lysophosphatidic acid receptors. Bioorg Med Chem Lett 16: 451–456. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Baker DL, Fujiwara Y, Pigg KR, Tsukahara R, Kobayashi S, et al. (2006) Carba analogs of cyclic phosphatidic acid are selective inhibitors of autotaxin and cancer cell invasion and metastasis. J Biol Chem 281: 22786–22793. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Jiang G, Xu Y, Fujiwara Y, Tsukahara T, Tsukahara R, et al. (2007) Alpha-substituted phosphonate analogues of lysophosphatidic acid (LPA) selectively inhibit production and action of LPA. ChemMedChem 2: 679–690. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Prestwich GD, Gajewiak J, Zhang H, Xu X, Yang G, et al. (2008) Phosphatase-resistant analogues of lysophosphatidic acid: Agonists promote healing, antagonists and autotaxin inhibitors treat cancer. Biochim Biophys Acta 8: 8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Albers HM, Dong A, van Meeteren LA, Egan DA, Sunkara M, et al. (2010) Boronic acid-based inhibitor of autotaxin reveals rapid turnover of LPA in the circulation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107: 7257–7262. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Gierse JK, Thorarensen A, Beltey K, Bradshaw-Pierce E, Cortes-Burgos L, et al. (2010) A Novel Autotaxin Inhibitor Reduces Lysophosphatidic Acid Levels in Plasma and the Site of Inflammation. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 34. Zhang H, Xu X, Gajewiak J, Tsukahara R, Fujiwara Y, et al. (2009) Dual activity lysophosphatidic acid receptor pan-antagonist/autotaxin inhibitor reduces breast cancer cell migration in vitro and causes tumor regression in vivo. Cancer Res 69: 5441–5449. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Xu X, Prestwich GD (2010) Inhibition of tumor growth and angiogenesis by a lysophosphatidic acid antagonist in an engineered three-dimensional lung cancer xenograft model. Cancer 116: 1739–1750. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Mazzocca A, Dituri F, Lupo L, Quaranta M, Antonaci S, et al. Tumor-secreted lysophostatidic acid accelerates hepatocellular carcinoma progression by promoting differentiation of peritumoral fibroblasts in myofibroblasts. Hepatology 54: 920–930. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Yang G, Zhang H, Prestwich GD (2012) Tissue-Engineered “Metastases”: Treatment of Hepatic Colon Tumors with a Dual Action Autotaxin Inhibitor-Lysophosphatidic Acid Receptor Antagonist. Journal of Cancer Research Updates 1: 69–77. [Google Scholar]
- 38.Bai Z, Cai L, Umemoto E, Takeda A, Tohya K, et al. (2013) Constitutive Lymphocyte Transmigration across the Basal Lamina of High Endothelial Venules Is Regulated by the Autotaxin/Lysophosphatidic Acid Axis. J Immunol. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 39. Fischer DJ, Nusser N, Virag T, Yokoyama K, Wang D, et al. (2001) Short-chain phosphatidates are subtype-selective antagonists of lysophosphatidic acid receptors. Molecular Pharmacology 60: 776–784. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Noguchi K, Ishii S, Shimizu T (2003) Identification of p2y9/GPR23 as a novel G protein-coupled receptor for lysophosphatidic acid, structurally distant from the Edg family. The Journal of biological chemistry 278: 25600–25606. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Virag T, Elrod DB, Liliom K, Sardar VM, Parrill AL, et al. (2003) Fatty alcohol phosphates are subtype-selective agonists and antagonists of lysophosphatidic acid receptors. Molecular Pharmacology 63: 1032–1042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Plows D, Kontogeorgos G, Kollias G (1999) Mice lacking mature T and B lymphocytes develop arthritic lesions after immunization with type II collagen. J Immunol 162: 1018–1023. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Brand DD, Latham KA, Rosloniec EF (2007) Collagen-induced arthritis. Nat Protoc 2: 1269–1275. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Aidinis V, Carninci P, Armaka M, Witke W, Harokopos V, et al. (2005) Cytoskeletal rearrangements in synovial fibroblasts as a novel pathophysiological determinant of modeled rheumatoid arthritis. PLoS Genet 1: e48. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Folch J, Lees M, Sloane Stanley GH (1957) A simple method for the isolation and purification of total lipides from animal tissues. J Biol Chem 226: 497–509. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Giganti A, Rodriguez M, Fould B, Moulharat N, Coge F, et al. (2008) Murine and human autotaxin alpha, beta, and gamma isoforms: gene organization, tissue distribution, and biochemical characterization. J Biol Chem 283: 7776–7789. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Nakamura K, Kishimoto T, Ohkawa R, Okubo S, Tozuka M, et al. (2007) Suppression of lysophosphatidic acid and lysophosphatidylcholine formation in the plasma in vitro: proposal of a plasma sample preparation method for laboratory testing of these lipids. Anal Biochem 367: 20–27. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Tokumura A, Miyake M, Yoshimoto O, Shimizu M, Fukuzawa K (1998) Metal-ion stimulation and inhibition of lysophospholipase D which generates bioactive lysophosphatidic acid in rat plasma. Lipids 33: 1009–1015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Ferry G, Moulharat N, Pradere JP, Desos P, Try A, et al. (2008) S32826: a Nanomolar Inhibitor of Autotaxin. Discovery, Synthesis and Applications as a Pharmacological Tool. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 50. Cheng HC (2001) The power issue: determination of KB or Ki from IC50. A closer look at the Cheng-Prusoff equation, the Schild plot and related power equations. J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods 46: 61–71. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Taube J, McWilliam N, Luddington R, Byrne CD, Baglin T (1999) Activated protein C resistance: effect of platelet activation, platelet-derived microparticles, and atherogenic lipoproteins. Blood 93: 3792–3797. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Ferguson CG, Bigman CS, Richardson RD, vanMeeteren LA, Moolenaar WH, et al. (2006) Fluorogenic Phospholipid Substrate to Detect Lysophospholipase D/Autotaxin Activity. Org Lett 8: 2023–2026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Hoeglund AB, Bostic HE, Howard AL, Wanjala IW, Best MD, et al. (2010) Optimization of a pipemidic acid autotaxin inhibitor. J Med Chem 53: 1056–1066. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54. Parrill AL, Echols U, Nguyen T, Pham TC, Hoeglund A, et al. (2008) Virtual screening approaches for the identification of non-lipid autotaxin inhibitors. Bioorg Med Chem 16: 1784–1795. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55. Saunders LP, Cao W, Chang WC, Albright RA, Braddock DT, et al. (2011) Kinetic analysis of autotaxin reveals substrate-specific catalytic pathways and a mechanism for lysophosphatidic acid distribution. The Journal of biological chemistry 286: 30130–30141. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56. Moolenaar WH, Perrakis A (2011) Insights into autotaxin: how to produce and present a lipid mediator. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 12: 674–679. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57. Federico L, Pamuklar Z, Smyth SS, Morris AJ (2008) Therapeutic potential of autotaxin/lysophospholipase d inhibitors. Curr Drug Targets 9: 698–708. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58. Tokumura A, Majima E, Kariya Y, Tominaga K, Kogure K, et al. (2002) Identification of human plasma lysophospholipase D, a lysophosphatidic acid-producing enzyme, as autotaxin, a multifunctional phosphodiesterase. J Biol Chem 277: 39436–39442. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59. van Meeteren LA, Ruurs P, Christodoulou E, Goding JW, Takakusa H, et al. (2005) Inhibition of autotaxin by lysophosphatidic acid and sphingosine 1-phosphate. J Biol Chem 280: 21155–21161. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60. Clair T, Aoki J, Koh E, Bandle RW, Nam SW, et al. (2003) Autotaxin hydrolyzes sphingosylphosphorylcholine to produce the regulator of migration, sphingosine-1-phosphate. Cancer Res 63: 5446–5453. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61. Croset M, Brossard N, Polette A, Lagarde M (2000) Characterization of plasma unsaturated lysophosphatidylcholines in human and rat. Biochem J 345 Pt 1: 61–67. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62. Ojala PJ, Hirvonen TE, Hermansson M, Somerharju P, Parkkinen J (2007) Acyl chain-dependent effect of lysophosphatidylcholine on human neutrophils. J Leukoc Biol 82: 1501–1509. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63. Weltzien HU, Arnold B, Reuther R (1977) Quantitative studies on lysolecithin-mediated hemolysis. Use of ether-deoxy lysolecithin analogs with varying aliphatic chain-lengths. Biochimica et biophysica acta 466: 411–421. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64. Hausmann J, Kamtekar S, Christodoulou E, Day JE, Wu T, et al. (2011) Structural basis of substrate discrimination and integrin binding by autotaxin. Nat Struct Mol Biol 18: 198–204. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65. Aoki J, Inoue A, Okudaira S (2008) Two pathways for lysophosphatidic acid production. Biochim Biophys Acta 1781: 513–518. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66. Fotopoulou S, Oikonomou N, Grigorieva E, Nikitopoulou I, Paparountas T, et al. (2010) ATX expression and LPA signalling are vital for the development of the nervous system. Dev Biol 339: 451–464. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67. Tokumura A, Carbone LD, Yoshioka Y, Morishige J, Kikuchi M, et al. (2009) Elevated serum levels of arachidonoyl-lysophosphatidic acid and sphingosine 1-phosphate in systemic sclerosis. Int J Med Sci 6: 168–176. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68. Gierse J, Thorarensen A, Beltey K, Bradshaw-Pierce E, Cortes-Burgos L, et al. A novel autotaxin inhibitor reduces lysophosphatidic acid levels in plasma and the site of inflammation. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 334: 310–317. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69. Wu JM, Xu Y, Skill NJ, Sheng H, Zhao Z, et al. (2010) Autotaxin expression and its connection with the TNF-alpha-NF-kappaB axis in human hepatocellular carcinoma. Mol Cancer 9: 71. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70. Nochi H, Tomura H, Tobo M, Tanaka N, Sato K, et al. (2008) Stimulatory role of lysophosphatidic acid in cyclooxygenase-2 induction by synovial fluid of patients with rheumatoid arthritis in fibroblast-like synovial cells. J Immunol 181: 5111–5119. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71. Zhao C, Sardella A, Chun J, Poubelle PE, Fernandes MJ, et al. (2011) TNF-alpha promotes LPA1- and LPA3-mediated recruitment of leukocytes in vivo through CXCR2 ligand chemokines. J Lipid Res 52: 1307–1318. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72. Watterson KR, Lanning DA, Diegelmann RF, Spiegel S (2007) Regulation of fibroblast functions by lysophospholipid mediators: potential roles in wound healing. Wound Repair Regen 15: 607–616. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73. Aidinis V, Plows D, Haralambous S, Armaka M, Papadopoulos P, et al. (2003) Functional analysis of an arthritogenic synovial fibroblast. Arthritis Res Ther 5: R140–157. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74. Stanczyk J, Ospelt C, Gay RE, Gay S (2006) Synovial cell activation. Curr Opin Rheumatol 18: 262–267. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75. Midwood K, Sacre S, Piccinini AM, Inglis J, Trebaul A, et al. (2009) Tenascin-C is an endogenous activator of Toll-like receptor 4 that is essential for maintaining inflammation in arthritic joint disease. Nat Med 15: 774–780. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76. Lee DM, Kiener HP, Agarwal SK, Noss EH, Watts GF, et al. (2007) Cadherin-11 in synovial lining formation and pathology in arthritis. Science 315: 1006–1010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77. Zhang Y, Chen YC, Krummel MF, Rosen SD (2012) Autotaxin through Lysophosphatidic Acid Stimulates Polarization, Motility, and Transendothelial Migration of Naive T Cells. J Immunol 189: 3914–3924. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78. Ohta H, Sato K, Murata N, Damirin A, Malchinkhuu E, et al. (2003) Ki16425, a subtype-selective antagonist for EDG-family lysophosphatidic acid receptors. Mol Pharmacol 64: 994–1005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Monach PA, Mathis D, Benoist C (2008) The K/BxN arthritis model. Curr Protoc Immunol Chapter 15: Unit 15 22. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 80.Orosa B, Gonzalez A, Mera A, Gomez-Reino JJ, Conde C (2012) Lysophosphatidic acid receptor 1 suppression sensitizes rheumatoid fibroblast-like synoviocytes to TNF-induced apoptosis. Arthritis Rheum. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 81. Jiang G, Madan D, Prestwich GD (2011) Aromatic phosphonates inhibit the lysophospholipase D activity of autotaxin. Bioorg Med Chem Lett 21: 5098–5101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82. Ferry G, Tellier E, Try A, Gres S, Naime I, et al. (2003) Autotaxin is released from adipocytes, catalyzes lysophosphatidic acid synthesis, and activates preadipocyte proliferation. Up-regulated expression with adipocyte differentiation and obesity. J Biol Chem 278: 18162–18169. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83. Oikonomou N, Mouratis MA, Tzouvelekis A, Kaffe E, Valavanis C, et al. (2012) Pulmonary autotaxin expression contributes to the pathogenesis of pulmonary fibrosis. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 47: 566–574. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84. Swaney JS, Chapman C, Correa LD, Stebbins KJ, Bundey RA, et al. (2010) A novel, orally active LPA(1) receptor antagonist inhibits lung fibrosis in the mouse bleomycin model. Br J Pharmacol 160: 1699–1713. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.