Skip to main content
PLOS ONE logoLink to PLOS ONE
. 2013 Jul 29;8(7):e69905. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0069905

3D Texture Analysis Reveals Imperceptible MRI Textural Alterations in the Thalamus and Putamen in Progressive Myoclonic Epilepsy Type 1, EPM1

Sanna Suoranta 1,*, Kirsi Holli-Helenius 2, Päivi Koskenkorva 1, Eini Niskanen 1, Mervi Könönen 1,4, Marja Äikiä 5, Hannu Eskola 2,3, Reetta Kälviäinen 5,6, Ritva Vanninen 1,7
Editor: Hemachandra Reddy8
PMCID: PMC3726751  PMID: 23922849

Abstract

Progressive myoclonic epilepsy type 1 (EPM1) is an autosomal recessively inherited neurodegenerative disorder characterized by young onset age, myoclonus and tonic-clonic epileptic seizures. At the time of diagnosis, the visual assessment of the brain MRI is usually normal, with no major changes found later. Therefore, we utilized texture analysis (TA) to characterize and classify the underlying properties of the affected brain tissue by means of 3D texture features. Sixteen genetically verified patients with EPM1 and 16 healthy controls were included in the study. TA was performed upon 3D volumes of interest that were placed bilaterally in the thalamus, amygdala, hippocampus, caudate nucleus and putamen. Compared to the healthy controls, EPM1 patients had significant textural differences especially in the thalamus and right putamen. The most significantly differing texture features included parameters that measure the complexity and heterogeneity of the tissue, such as the co-occurrence matrix-based entropy and angular second moment, and also the run-length matrix-based parameters of gray-level non-uniformity, short run emphasis and long run emphasis. This study demonstrates the usability of 3D TA for extracting additional information from MR images. Textural alterations which suggest complex, coarse and heterogeneous appearance were found bilaterally in the thalamus, supporting the previous literature on thalamic pathology in EPM1. The observed putamenal involvement is a novel finding. Our results encourage further studies on the clinical applications, feasibility, reproducibility and reliability of 3D TA.

Introduction

Progressive myoclonic epilepsy type 1 or Unverricht-Lundborg disease (EPM1, ULD, OMIM 254800) is the most common type of progressive myoclonic epilepsy [1]. It is an autosomal recessively inherited neurodegenerative disorder caused by mutations in the cystatin B gene (CSTB) [2][4]. EPM1 in Finland has an incidence of 1∶20 000 births per year, with about 200 diagnosed cases [5]), but it is also prevalent elsewhere in the Baltic Sea region and in the Western Mediterranean area. Sporadic cases of EPM1 have been reported worldwide [6].

The first symptoms of EPM1 are commonly stimulus-sensitive myoclonic jerks and generalized tonic-clonic epileptic seizures. Neurological examination is initially normal, but patients later develop intention tremor, dysarthria, ataxia and poor coordination, thus subsequently one-third of EPM1 patients become severely incapacitated and wheelchair bound. Alternatively, the clinical symptoms can be so mild that there is a delay in the diagnosis and patients may manage well. [6] Mild cognitive impairment and slow decline in intellectual level over time have been reported [6][9].

MRI findings of the patients with EPM1 remain sparse. At the time of diagnosis, MRI of the brain is usually normal [6]. However, changes in MRI, such as mild to moderate cerebral and/or cerebellar atrophy, loss of neuronal volume in the brainstem and high intensity signal changes in the basal ganglia have been reported as well [7], [10][12]. Recently modern group level MRI analysis methods have revealed loss of gray matter volume in cortical motor areas (voxel-based morphometry, VBM), and atrophy of the sensorimotor, visual and auditory cortices (cortical thickness analysis, CTH) in EPM1 patients [13], [14] while abnormal findings could not be detected in visual assessments. Loss of gray matter volume in the thalamus has also been reported in one VBM study [13], paralleling a PET study indicating dopamine depletion in the thalamostriatal area in four EPM1 patients [15].

Although the human visual system can discriminate different textures, the capacity of human vision to detect and discriminate between complex higher-order textures is limited [16]. Texture analysis (TA) is a method to evaluate the position of signal features i.e. pixels/voxels, and their gray-level intensity, distribution and relationships in a digital image [17]. TA presents texture features as mathematical parameters, which could characterize the properties of the underlying tissue. These features can be described as, for example, fine, coarse, smooth, or irregular [18]. Previously, texture analysis techniques have been used two-dimensionally in medical imaging of multiple sclerosis, brain tumours and brain injuries [17], [19], [20]. In epilepsy research, TA has been applied in temporal lobe epilepsy, focal cortical dysplasia and juvenile myoclonic epilepsy (JME) [21][27].

Theoretically, three-dimensional (3D) texture analysis provides more comprehensive data analysis of biological tissue texture properties and enables calculation of texture parameters in several directions. However, the literature on 3D TA applications in brain research is still sparse [28][33].

Patients with EPM1 seem to provide a suitable population to assess the feasibility of novel image analysis techniques to detect possible subtle changes in the brain that are not evident upon visual assessment. The specific aim of this study is to investigate possible imperceptible structural differences in the thalamus and other deep gray matter tissue in patients with EPM1 via comparison with healthy controls by using three-dimensional MRI-based texture analysis. Further, we want to determine whether the possible texture changes correlate with EPM1 patients’ clinical symptoms and neuropsychological findings.

Patients and Methods

Subjects

EPM1 patients were evaluated at Kuopio University Hospital during the period 2006−2010. The study was jointly administered by the Folkhälsan Institute of Genetics and Neuroscience Center at the University of Helsinki. The patients had either participated in an earlier molecular genetics study or were referred to the Kuopio Epilepsy Center during the study. The ethics committee at the Kuopio University Hospital approved the study and written informed consent was obtained from all participants.

The original EPM1 study group comprised 66 EPM1 patients. In all cases, MR images were obtained using a T1-weighted 3D magnetization-prepared rapid acquisition of gradient echo sequence. Due to slight differences in updated scanner versions, technical difficulties, and slightly different slice thicknesses in some of the controls due to differences in head size, slight modifications in the parameters and resolutions were observed. Consequently, 16 genetically verified EPM1 patients (10 male, mean age of 31.0±10.9 years, range 18−51 years) and 16 healthy controls (8 men, mean age of 35.2±12.0 years, range 19−52 years) shared identical magnetization-prepared rapid acquisition of gradient echo sequence details and were included in the 3D TA study.

Clinical Assessment of Patients with EPM1

Of the EPM1 patients, 13 were homozygous for the dodecamer expansion mutation, while 3 were compound heterozygous for the expansion mutations. The mean onset age was 9.6±1.9 years (range 5−12 years) and the mean duration of the disorder at the time of the study was 21.4±10.2 years (range 8−41 years). All of the EPM1 patients were treated with antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). Valproate was in use in all 16 patients and was augmented with levetiracetam (n = 10), clonazepam (n = 10), topimarate (n = 3) piracetam (n = 4), lamotrigine (n = 5), clopazam (n = 1) or other AEDs (n = 5). The medical histories of EPM1 patients were confirmed from medical records and by interviewing the patients and their relatives. A Unified Myoclonus Rating Scale (UMRS) test panel was performed as part of the clinical patient evaluation. UMRS is a quantitative, 74-item clinical rating instrument comprising 8 sections [34]. The patients were video-recorded and evaluated by using the standard protocol. Higher UMRS scores indicate more severe myoclonus.

Neuropsychological assessments were performed by an experienced neuropsychologist (M.Ä). General intellectual ability was assessed with the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale Revised (WAIS-R) [35], and verbal and performance Intelligence Quotients (VIQ, PIQ) were estimated.

MR Image Acquisition

The EPM1 patients and healthy control subjects underwent MRI of the brain (1.5 T, Siemens Magnetom Avanto, Erlangen, Germany) using a birdcage Tx/Rx head coil. T1-weighted 3D images (magnetization-prepared rapid acquisition of gradient echo: TR 1980 ms, TE 3.93 ms, flip angle 15°, matrix 256×256, 176 sagittal slices, slice thickness 1.0 mm, in-slice resolution of 1.0 mm×1.0 mm) were used for regional 3D TA.

Texture Analysis and Volumes of Interest Definition

TA was performed with the software package MaZda (MaZda 4.60 3D, Institute of Electronics, Technical University of Lodz, Poland) [36], [37]specially designed for texture analysis by Materka and co-workers as a part of the European COST B11 and the following COST B21 programs.

Spherical volumes of interest (VOI) were manually placed bilaterally on each region of interest in the deep gray matter structures (thalamus, putamen, caudate nucleus, hippocampus and amygdala; Figure 1). The VOIs were carefully placed to avoid any overlap with other anatomical structures or cerebrospinal fluid. The 3D VOI placement was done manually by two observers (S.S. and K.H.).

Figure 1. Volumes of interests and a three-dimensional view of the brain in MaZda.

Figure 1

Image slices from a T1-weighted 3D image package illustrating the volumes of interest in a 19 year old female patient. There is no focal pathology or atrophy visible. VOIs are placed bilaterally in the thalamus, hippocampi, amygdalae, caudate nuclei and putamen.

Image gray level intensity normalization was performed with method limiting image intensities in the range [μ−3σ, μ+3σ], where μ is the mean gray level value and σ the standard deviation. This method has been shown to intensify differences between two classes when comparing image intensity normalization methods in texture classification [38].

A total of 223 texture parameters were calculated based on the histogram, gradient, run-length matrix and co-occurrence matrix (Table 1) [36], [37]. Run-length matrix parameters were calculated in four directions: horizontal (0°), vertical (90°), 45° and 135°, and co-occurrence matrix parameters were calculated in three distances of 1, 2 and 3 voxels in each 3D spatial co-ordinate directions were considered. All of these texture features were calculated for each VOI.

Table 1. Texture features used in the study.

Histogram Absolute gradient Co-occurrence matrix Run-length matrix
Mean Mean Angular second moment Run-length non-uniformity
Variance Variance Contrast Gray-level non-uniformity
Skewness Skewness Correlation Long run emphasis
Kurtosis Kurtosis Sum of squares Short run emphasis
Percentiles 1-, 10-, 50-, 90-, 99-% Percentage of pixels with non-zero gradient Inverse difference moment Fraction image in runs
Sum average
Sum variance
Sum entropy
Difference variance
Difference entropy

Statistical Analysis

Statistical analyses were performed with SPSS 19.0 (IBM SPSS, Chicago, Illinois). P-values under 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Because of the small group size and skewed distributions, nonparametric statistical tests were used. The Mann-Whitney U test was used to evaluate the raw TA parameters to describe the textural difference between EPM1 patients and controls on each VOI. All 223 raw texture parameters were statistically tested to find out how many and which of the 223 parameters differed statistically.

The texture parameters were calculated in several directions and pixel distances, mean value for different pixel distances, and directions were calculated for six texture parameters (Table 2) and for correlation analysis of four texture parameters (entropy, angular second moment, short run emphasis, long run emphasis). Thus, the Spearman correlation coefficient was used to assess any correlations between the mean values of the four texture parameters and the clinical parameters (myoclonus in action score, age, duration of the disease, PIQ and VIQ).

Table 2. Texture features that differed most between the patients with EPM1 and healthy controls.

Patient Control
Mean SD Mean SD p
Histogram-based parameters
Mean 3D
VOI1, right thalamus 677.71 24.03 664.88 22.06 0.152
VOI2, left thalamus 682.10 23.13 658.23 21.71 0.004
VOI9, right putamen 631.92 21.25 653.66 24.70 0.016
Variance 3D
VOI1, right thalamus 1571.64 353.99 1148.05 204.36 0.001
VOI2, left thalamus 1500.03 215.39 1113.45 160.68 0.000
VOI9, right putamen 682.85 226.09 542.93 127.31 0.050
Co-occurence-based parameters
Mean of angular second moment
VOI1, right thalamus 5.55×10−4 1.42×10−5 5.76×10−4 1.52×10−5 0.001
VOI2, left thalamus 5.57×10−4 1.05×10−5 5.79×10−4 1.21×10−5 0.000
VOI9, right putamen 9.06×10−3 2.96×10−4 9.38×10−3 3.14×10−4 0.006
Mean of entropy
VOI1, right thalamus 3.28 8.50×10−3 3.27 8.61×10−3 0.001
VOI2, left thalamus 3.28 6.03×10−3 3.27 6.93×10−3 0.000
VOI9, right putamen 2.11 1.04×10−2 2.09 1.24×10−2 0.005
Run-length matrix-based parameters
Mean of short run emphasis
VOI1, right thalamus 9.91×10−1 7.84×10−4 9.90×10−1 1.14×10−3 0.000
VOI2, left thalamus 9.91×10−1 1.53×10−3 9.90×10−1 1.42×10−3 0.042
VOI9, right putamen 9.93×10−1 2.46×10−3 9.91×10−1 3.30×10−3 0.101
Mean of long run emphasis
VOI1, right thalamus 1.035 3.30×10−3 1.042 4.63×10−3 0.000
VOI2, left thalamus 1.038 6.18×10−3 1.043 5.72×10−3 0.026
VOI9, right putamen 1.029 1.02×10−2 1.037 1.38×10−2 0.109
Run-length non-uniformity
VOI1, right thalamus 1381.49 7.98 1372.74 13.29 0.046
VOI2, left thalamus 1377.92 10.98 1369.90 17.78 0.050
VOI9, right putamen 140.79 2.49 137.49 3.45 0.002
Gray-level non-uniformity
VOI1, right thalamus 11.41 1.00 12.95 1.21 0.001
VOI2, left thalamus 11.48 0.70 13.14 0.99 0.000
VOI9, right putamen 2.58 0.34 2.74 0.18 0.032

Mean 3D and Variance 3D are single texture features whereas co-occurrence and run-length matrix-based parameters are the mean of each texture feature.

To test the reproducibility of the TA, 10 control subjects were drawn by two observers. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) with a 95% confidence interval, coefficient of variation (CV) and paired samples t-test were calculated. Co-occurrence parameters from one voxel distance (1, 0, 0) i.e., all together 1320 numerical values per observer were involved in the reproducibility analysis.

Results

The demographic and clinical data of patients with EPM1 are presented in Table 3. When assessed visually by experienced neuroradiologists (P.K. and R.V.), no focal signal intensity abnormalities were found (Figures 1 and 2).

Table 3. Demographic data of 16 EPM1 patients.

n Mean ± SD Range
Sex, M/F 10/6
Age, y 31.0±10.9 18−51
Age at EPM1 onset, y 9.6±1.9 5−12
Duration of disease, y 21.4±10.2 8−41
UMRS: Myoclonus with Action 49.1±25.8 12−92
Wheelchair use, no/occasionally/wheelchair bound 9/4/3
Number of AED’s in use, 2/3/4/5 5/5/5/1
Phenytoin use, never/earlier temporarily/unknown 9/6/1
VIQ 82.4±12.4 62−102
PIQ 70.4±13.1 52−94

Figure 2. Illustrative images from a 34 year old male patient with EPM1.

Figure 2

A) T1-weighted, B) T2-weighted and C) Fluid-Attenuated Inversion Recovery (FLAIR) MR images. Mild frontoparietal cortical atrophy can be suspected but there are no visible focal abnormalities.

Reproducibility

Reproducibility of 3D TA proved to be excellent. There were no statistically significant differences (p = 0.738) between Observer 1 and Observer 2 in the values of co-occurrence (1, 0, 0) parameters. ICC was excellent (0.990). The CV was 1.90 for Observer 1, and 1.89 for Observer 2.

Regional Texture Parameters differing between Patients and Control Subjects

The regional differences in texture parameters (n = 223) were evaluated by the number of TA parameters with statistically significant differences between EPM1 patients and healthy controls (Table 4). The largest number of significant differences between EPM1 patients and healthy controls were found in the VOIs of the thalamus (Table 4) and were based on co-occurrence matrix, in particular the following parameters: angular second moment, entropy, sum variance and sum average (Table 5). The values of entropy were higher in patients than in healthy controls whereas the angular second moment feature acted in the opposite direction (Table 2).

Table 4. Volumes of interest (VOI) with number and percentages of statistically significantly different texture parameters from a total of 223 texture parameters between EPM1 patients and healthy controls.

Region Volume of VOI (mm3) Number of statistically significant different parameters %
VOI 1, Right side of the thalamus 1437 62 28%
VOI 2, Left side of the thalamus 1437 83 37%
VOI 3, Right central thalamus 66 27 12%
VOI 4, Left central thalamus 66 12 5%
VOI 5, Right amygdala 144 15 7%
VOI 6, Left amygdala 144 11 5%
VOI 7, Right hippocampus 144 4 0.5%
VOI 8, Left hippocampus 144 11 5%
VOI 9, Right putamen 144 59 26%
VOI 10, Left putamen 144 10 1%
VOI 11, Right caudate nucleus 144 7 3%
VOI 12, Left caudate nucleus 144 16 7%

Table 5. The number of differing co-occurence based texture parameters (p<0.05) between EPM1 patients and healthy controls in the thalamus and putamen in three distances in all five evaluated directions (maximal number = 15 parameters).

Thalamus (right side) Thalamus (left side) Putamen right Putamen left
Angular second moment 14/15 15/15 6/15 1/15
Entropy 14/15 15/15 9/15 0/15
Sum average 7/15 1/15 2/15 0/15
Sum variance 1/15 8/15 0/15 0/15
Sum entropy 3/15 3/15 5/15 0/15
Sum of squares 4/15 0/15 4/15 1/15
Contrast 1/15 6/15 1/15 1/15
Correlation 1/15 6/15 0/15 0/15

The most different texture parameters are displayed in bold.

The thalamus also differed in the histogram-based features including variance and mean as EPM1 patients had higher values than healthy controls. Furthermore, the run-length matrix-based parameters also differed between patients and controls (Table 6). The values of short run emphasis were larger in patients than in healthy controls, whilst values of long run emphasis features acted in the opposite direction (Table 2). Values indicating gray-level non-uniformity were smaller in patients than in controls and vice versa with run-length non-uniformity (Table 2).

Table 6. The directions of differing run-length-based texture parameters (p<0.05) between EPM1 patients and healthy controls in the thalamus and putamen.

Thalamus (right side) Thalamus (left side) Putamen right Putamen left
Long run emphasis Horizontal Horizontal 135° 45°
135° Vertical
Short run emphasis Horizontal Vertical 135° 45°
135°
Run-length non-uniformity 135° Horizontal Horizontal
Vertical 45°
135°
Gray-level non-uniformity All degrees All degrees All degrees

In addition to the thalamus bilaterally, the right putamen provided statistically differing texture features between EPM1 patients and healthy controls (Tables 4 and 2). Again, significant differences were found in histogram-, co-occurrence matrix- and run-length matrix-based parameters. No major differences were found between EPM1 patients and healthy controls in the left putamen, hippocampi, amygdalae or caudate nuclei.

Correlations between TA and Clinical Parameters

The myoclonus in action score correlated significantly with the angular second moment values in the left side of the thalamus (VOI2, r = 0.542, p = 0.030) and tended to correlate with values from the right side of the thalamus (VOI1, r = 0,440, p = 0.088). A tendency for inverse correlation was observed between the myoclonus in action score and the entropy values both in the right side of the thalamus (r = −0.442, p = 0.087) and left side of the thalamus (r = −0.495, p = 0.051). No correlations were found between the texture parameters in the thalamus and age, duration of the disorder, PIQ and VIQ. In the right putamen, the VIQ score significantly correlated with the entropy values (r = −0.498, p = 0.050) and angular second moment values (r = 0.514, p = 0.042). No correlations were found between the texture parameters in the right putamen and myoclonus in action score, age, duration of the disorder or PIQ.

Discussion

The present study shows that MRI-based texture analysis reveals imperceptible alterations in EPM1 patients, especially in the thalamus. Three dimensional TA is a novel method for the analysis of MR images of the brain, and according to our results, 3D TA is able to provide subtle information of the structures of deep gray matter in EPM1 patients that could not be detected by direct visual inspection of the images. The TA changes were demonstrated by statistical analysis of the pixel gray level distributions in the volumes of interest in the anatomical structures analysed.

In our study we used 3D texture analysis, a more advanced technique than reported in most of the previous TA studies [17]. Studies of TA in epilepsy are sparse but have evaluated hippocampal abnormalities in temporal lobe epilepsy [21], [24], [26], [27] and observed subtle lesions of cortex in focal cortical dysplasia [22], [23]. Recently, 2D texture analysis based on co-occurrence matrix was able to detect tissue alterations in the right side of the thalamus in JME, and both caudate nuclei and the thalamus in Machado-Joseph disease, a rare neurodegenerative disorder characterized by ataxia and motorical dysfunction [25], [39].

The present TA study detected significantly different thalamic texture features in EPM1 patients compared to healthy controls. This is in line with imaging and experimental studies that have previously suggested thalamic and possible dopaminergic pathology in EPM1 [11], [13], [15], [40][42]. The thalamus is a relay centre between subcortical areas and the cerebral cortex, and it has multiple sensory and motor functions, along with the regulation of awareness, attention, memory and language [43][45]. Lesions confined to the thalamus have been associated with asterixis [46], and hemorrhages restricted to the region lateralis of the thalamus lead to a cheiro-oral syndrome [47] or choreiform and dystonic movements associated with myorhythmia [48]. Lesions of both thalamus and basal ganglia are related to dystonia [49]. Similar clinical symptoms are seen in both EPM1 patients [6] and Cstb-deficient mice [50] in the shape of ataxia, apraxia, dysarthia and involuntary asynchronous myoclonic jerks that occur mainly in the proximal muscles of the extremities.

The most significantly different parameters in the thalami of EPM1 patients compared to controls were the second-order co-occurrence matrix-based parameters, especially angular second moment and entropy values. Angular second moment is a measure of homogeneity as it measures the monotony of gray level transition in an image texture. The observed higher value of this feature in control individuals indicates that the intensity varies less in the VOI and the VOI is more homogenous than in EPM1 patients. Entropy indicates the complexity and randomness within the VOI. When the image is not texturally uniform then the value of entropy is larger [18]. In other words, our results indicate that the thalamus may be structurally more complex and heterogenous in EPM1.

We also observed differences in first-order histogram-based parameters and higher-order RLM-based parameters. Histogram-based statistics assess the global distribution of pixels/voxels with specific gray level tones [17]. Several statistical properties can be calculated from the histogram. The mean is the average intensity level of the image, variance assesses the roughness of an image, skewness describes the histogram symmetry and kurtosis describes the flatness of the histogram. We found that EPM1 patients had higher values of variance in the thalamus than those of the control group, thus the thalamic texture in EPM1 patients is rougher than that of healthy controls.

RLM-based parameters assess the number of runs when two or more pixels/voxels have the same value in a present direction, and they describe the coarseness or smoothness of an image [51]. Gray-level non-uniformity calculates how uniformly the runs are distributed among the gray levels; smaller values indicate that the distribution of runs is more uniform. The value of short run emphasis is larger in more coarse images and the value of long run emphasis is larger in smoother images. In the present study, the short run emphasis features were larger in the thalami of EPM1 patients than in healthy controls, indicating a more coarse thalamic texture.

Put together, the observed differences in variance, angular second moment, entropy and short run emphasis features indicate that the texture of the thalamus may be more complex, rough and coarse in EPM1 patients than in healthy controls.

The putamen together with the caudate nucleus and nucleus accumbens form the striatum, which is a major part of the basal ganglia. Basal ganglia are a part of the extrapyramidal motor system involved in cognition, emotion and motivation [52]. The anterior parts of the striatum, including the putamen, are essential for learning, attention, planning [53], [54] and verbal working memory [55], where dopamine plays an essential role in neurotransmission [56]. Putamenal pathology is related to movement disorders that also contain cognitive features, for example Parkinson’s disease and Huntington’s disease [57]. Interestingly, microstructural and volumetric abnormalities of the putamen have also been observed in juvenile myoclonic epilepsy [58] which shares similar clinical characteristics with EPM1.

Our results indicated that the right putamen had significantly different texture parameters in EPM1 patients when compared to the healthy controls. The most significantly different parameters were the same as those found in the thalamus bilaterally; co-occurrence matrix based angular second moment and entropy. The VIQ correlated negatively with entropy and positively with angular second moment values in the right putamen, indicating that the smaller the VIQ score, the more complex the texture in the right putamen. There was no correlation between myoclonus in action scores and entropy in the putamen of either hemisphere. Our VOI included the anterior, mainly rostrodorsal (associative) part of the putamen that is involved in learning new motor tasks, whereas the posterior caudoventral (sensorimotor) part of putamen is more involved in storage and execution of learned tasks [59], [60]. The parallel textural alterations in the thalamus and right putamen are an interesting finding. Initially, basal ganglia-thalamocortical circuitry was considered to be involved only in the control of movement but nowadays these structures are also regarded to be part of higher-order behavioral control [52], [63].

Memory problems are not main symptoms in EPM1 [61], [62] and previous imaging studies have not revealed any hippocampal abnormalities. In agreement with the previous studies, we found no major textural differences in the hippocampi, amygdalae or caudate nuclei between the EPM1 patients and healthy controls.

Our study has some limitations. The original study population had in part been scanned with slightly different MR imaging parameters. Since we wanted to make sure the different imaging parameters do not affect the TA results, our identical MRI data for TA remained relatively small. Further, some of the original patient imaging data could not be included in the texture analysis because of the suboptimal image quality caused by myoclonic movement artefacts. Finally, 16 patients and 16 controls from the original study population shared the identical imaging protocol and were included in the present TA study. The restrictions in the data collection reflect the fact that TA is still an experimental method with many limitations, including its potential sensitivity to slight differences in different scanners, coils and imaging protocols, complicating its routine clinical use and prohibiting data comparisons between institutions.

To conclude, three dimensional TA proved to be a feasible method to obtain imperceptible quantitative individual information from MR images of the brain in EPM1. Patients with EPM1 exhibit more coarse and heterogeneous texture in thalamus and right putamen. The textural differences observed in the present study parallel the previous imaging, neuropathological, and molecular genetics studies of thalamic involvement in EPM1. Textural alterations in the right putamen is a novel finding. Our results indicate that the changes in both the thalamus and putamen may play an important role in the pathophysiology of EPM1. Further studies in larger patient materials will show whether 3D TA could be a relevant tool for clinical applications.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank all the participants for their participation and cooperation in the present study.

Funding Statement

This work was partially supported by EVO grants 5772751 and 5063523 from Kuopio University Hospital (SS), Strategic Funding for the UEF-BRAIN consortium from University of Eastern Finland (SS), Finnish Brain Foundation (SS), Neuroradiologists of Finland (SS), Instrumentarium Research Foundation (SS), Academy of Finland (RK) and UCB Pharma (RK). Outside the submitted work RK has received funding for travel from UCB Pharma and Eisai; and has received speaker honoraria from UCB Pharma, Eisai, Orion, Pfizer and GlaxoSmithKline. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1. Shahwan A, Farrell M, Delanty N (2005) Progressive myoclonic epilepsies: a review of genetic and therapeutic aspects. Lancet Neurol 4: 239–248 Doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(05)70043-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Lafreniere RG, Rochefort DL, Chretien N, Rommens JM, Cochius JI, et al. (1997) Unstable insertion in the 5′ flanking region of the cystatin B gene is the most common mutation in progressive myoclonus epilepsy type 1, EPM1. Nat Genet 15: 298–302. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Lalioti MD, Scott HS, Buresi C, Rossier C, Bottani A, et al. (1997) Dodecamer repeat expansion in cystatin B gene in progressive myoclonus epilepsy. Nature 386: 847–851 Doi: 10.1038/386847a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Pennacchio LA, Lehesjoki AE, Stone NE, Willour VL, Virtaneva K, et al. (1996) Mutations in the gene encoding cystatin B in progressive myoclonus epilepsy (EPM1). Science 271: 1731–1734. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Norio R, Koskiniemi M (1979) Progressive myoclonus epilepsy: genetic and nosological aspects with special reference to 107 Finnish patients. Clin Genet 15: 382–398. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Kalviainen R, Khyuppenen J, Koskenkorva P, Eriksson K, Vanninen R, et al. (2008) Clinical picture of EPM1-Unverricht-Lundborg disease. Epilepsia 49: 549–556 Doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2008.01546.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Chew NK, Mir P, Edwards MJ, Cordivari C, Martino D, et al. (2008) The natural history of Unverricht-Lundborg disease: a report of eight genetically proven cases. Mov Disord 23: 107–113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Ferlazzo E, Gagliano A, Calarese T, Magaudda A, Striano P, et al. (2009) Neuropsychological findings in patients with Unverricht-Lundborg disease. Epilepsy Behav 14: 545–549 Doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2009.01.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Lehesjoki AE, Koskiniemi M (1999) Progressive myoclonus epilepsy of Unverricht-Lundborg type. Epilepsia 40 Suppl 323–28. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Korja M, Ferlazzo E, Soilu-Hanninen M, Magaudda A, Marttila R, et al. (2010) T2-weighted high-intensity signals in the basal ganglia as an interesting image finding in Unverricht-Lundborg disease. Epilepsy Res 88: 87–91 Doi: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2009.09.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Mascalchi M, Michelucci R, Cosottini M, Tessa C, Lolli F, et al. (2002) Brainstem involvement in Unverricht-Lundborg disease (EPM1): An MRI and (1)H MRS study. Neurology 58: 1686–1689. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Santoshkumar B, Turnbull J, Minassian BA (2008) Unverricht-Lundborg progressive myoclonus epilepsy in Oman. Pediatr Neurol 38: 252–255 Doi: 10.1016/. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Koskenkorva P, Khyuppenen J, Niskanen E, Kononen M, Bendel P, et al. (2009) Motor cortex and thalamic atrophy in Unverricht-Lundborg disease: voxel-based morphometric study. Neurology 73: 606–611 Doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181b3888b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Koskenkorva P, Niskanen E, Hypponen J, Kononen M, Mervaala E, et al. (2012) Sensorimotor, visual, and auditory cortical atrophy in Unverricht-Lundborg disease mapped with cortical thickness analysis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 33: 878–883 Doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A2882. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Korja M, Kaasinen V, Lamusuo S, Parkkola R, Nagren K, et al. (2007) Substantial thalamostriatal dopaminergic defect in Unverricht-Lundborg disease. Epilepsia 48: 1768–1773. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Julesz B, Gilbert EN, Shepp LA, Frisch HL (1973) Inability of humans to discriminate between visual textures that agree in second-order statistics-revisited. Perception 2: 391–405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Castellano G, Bonilha L, Li LM, Cendes F (2004) Texture analysis of medical images. Clin Radiol 59: 1061–1069. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Haralick R (1973) Textural features for image classification. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics SMC-3 610–621.
  • 19. Holli KK, Waljas M, Harrison L, Liimatainen S, Luukkaala T, et al. (2010) Mild traumatic brain injury: tissue texture analysis correlated to neuropsychological and DTI findings. Acad Radiol 17: 1096–1102 Doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2010.04.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Kassner A, Thornhill RE (2010) Texture analysis: a review of neurologic MR imaging applications. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 31: 809–816 Doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A2061. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Alegro M, Silva A, Bando S, Lopes R, Martins de Castro L, et al. (2012) Texture analysis of high resolution MRI allows discrimination between febrile and afebrile initial precipitating injury in mesial temporal sclerosis. Magn Reson Med 68: 1647–1653 Doi: 10.1002/mrm.24174. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Antel SB, Collins DL, Bernasconi N, Andermann F, Shinghal R, et al. (2003) Automated detection of focal cortical dysplasia lesions using computational models of their MRI characteristics and texture analysis. Neuroimage 19: 1748–1759. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Bernasconi A, Antel SB, Collins DL, Bernasconi N, Olivier A, et al. (2001) Texture analysis and morphological processing of magnetic resonance imaging assist detection of focal cortical dysplasia in extra-temporal partial epilepsy. Ann Neurol 49: 770–775. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Bonilha L, Kobayashi E, Castellano G, Coelho G, Tinois E, et al. (2003) Texture analysis of hippocampal sclerosis. Epilepsia 44: 1546–1550. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. de Oliveira MS, Betting LE, Mory SB, Cendes F, Castellano G (2013) Texture analysis of magnetic resonance images of patients with juvenile myoclonic epilepsy. Epilepsy Behav 27: 22–28 Doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2012.12.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Jafari-Khouzani K, Elisevich K, Patel S, Smith B, Soltanian-Zadeh H (2010) FLAIR signal and texture analysis for lateralizing mesial temporal lobe epilepsy. Neuroimage 49: 1559–1571 Doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.08.064. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Yu O, Mauss Y, Namer IJ, Chambron J (2001) Existence of contralateral abnormalities revealed by texture analysis in unilateral intractable hippocampal epilepsy. Magn Reson Imaging 19: 1305–1310. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Chen W, Giger ML, Li H, Bick U, Newstead GM (2007) Volumetric texture analysis of breast lesions on contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance images. Magn Reson Med 58: 562–571. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Georgiadis P, Cavouras D, Kalatzis I, Glotsos D, Athanasiadis E, et al. (2009) Enhancing the discrimination accuracy between metastases, gliomas and meningiomas on brain MRI by volumetric textural features and ensemble pattern recognition methods. Magn Reson Imaging 27: 120–130 Doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2008.05.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Kocinski M, Klepaczko A, Materka A, Chekenya M, Lundervold A (2012) 3D image texture analysis of simulated and real-world vascular trees. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 107: 140–154 Doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2011.06.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Kovalev VA, Kruggel F, von Cramon DY (2003) Gender and age effects in structural brain asymmetry as measured by MRI texture analysis. Neuroimage 19: 895–905. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Mahmoud-Ghoneim D, Toussaint G, Constans JM, de Certaines JD (2003) Three dimensional texture analysis in MRI: a preliminary evaluation in gliomas. Magn Reson Imaging 21: 983–987 Doi:10.1186/1471-2342-10-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Zhang J, Yu C, Jiang G, Liu W, Tong L (2012) 3D texture analysis on MRI images of Alzheimer’s disease. Brain Imaging Behav 6: 61–69 Doi: 10.1007/s11682-011-9142-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Frucht SJ, Leurgans SE, Hallett M, Fahn S (2002) The Unified Myoclonus Rating Scale. Adv Neurol 89: 361–376. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Wechsler D (1981) WAIST-R manual. New York: The Psychological Corporation.
  • 36.Hajek M, Dezortova M, Materka A, Lerski R (2006) Texture analysis for magnetic resonance imaging. Prague, Czech Republic: Med4publishing.
  • 37. Szczypinski PM, Strzelecki M, Materka A, Klepaczko A (2009) MaZda–a software package for image texture analysis. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 94: 66–76 Doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2008.08.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Collewet G, Strzelecki M, Mariette F (2004) Influence of MRI acquisition protocols and image intensity normalization methods on texture classification. Magn Reson Imaging 22: 81–91. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. de Oliveira MS, D'Abreu A, Franca MC Jr, Lopes-Cendes I, Cendes F, et al. (2012) MRI-texture analysis of corpus callosum, thalamus, putamen, and caudate in Machado-Joseph disease. J Neuroimaging 22: 46–52 Doi: 10.1111/j.1552-6569.2010.00553.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Franceschetti S, Sancini G, Buzzi A, Zucchini S, Paradiso B, et al. (2007) A pathogenetic hypothesis of Unverricht-Lundborg disease onset and progression. Neurobiol Dis 25: 675–685. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Mervaala E, Andermann F, Quesney LF, Krelina M (1990) Common dopaminergic mechanism for epileptic photosensitivity in progressive myoclonus epilepsies. Neurology 40: 53–56. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Tegelberg S, Kopra O, Joensuu T, Cooper JD, Lehesjoki AE (2012) Early microglial activation precedes neuronal loss in the brain of the Cstb−/− mouse model of progressive myoclonus epilepsy, EPM1. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 71: 40–53 Doi: 10.1097/NEN.0b013e31823e68e1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Buchel C, Josephs O, Rees G, Turner R, Frith CD, et al. (1998) The functional anatomy of attention to visual motion. A functional MRI study. Brain 121 (Pt 7): 1281–1294. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Johnson MD, Ojemann GA (2000) The role of the human thalamus in language and memory: evidence from electrophysiological studies. Brain Cogn 42: 218–230. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Smythies J (1997) The functional neuroanatomy of awareness: with a focus on the role of various anatomical systems in the control of intermodal attention. Conscious Cogn 6: 455–481. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Lee MS, Marsden CD (1994) Movement disorders following lesions of the thalamus or subthalamic region. Mov Disord 9: 493–507. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Shintani S, Tsuruoka S, Shiigai T (2000) Pure sensory stroke caused by a cerebral hemorrhage: clinical-radiologic correlations in seven patients. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 21: 515–520. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Lera G, Scipioni O, Garcia S, Cammarota A, Fischbein G, et al. (2000) A combined pattern of movement disorders resulting from posterolateral thalamic lesions of a vascular nature: a syndrome with clinico-radiologic correlation. Mov Disord 15: 120–126. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Lee MS, Rinne JO, Ceballos-Baumann A, Thompson PD, Marsden CD (1994) Dystonia after head trauma. Neurology 44: 1374–1378. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Pennacchio LA, Bouley DM, Higgins KM, Scott MP, Noebels JL, et al. (1998) Progressive ataxia, myoclonic epilepsy and cerebellar apoptosis in cystatin B-deficient mice. Nat Genet 20: 251–258. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Galloway M (1975) Texture analysis using gray level run lengths. Computer Graphics and Image Processing 4: 172–179. [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Herrero MT, Barcia C, Navarro JM (2002) Functional anatomy of thalamus and basal ganglia. Childs Nerv Syst 18: 386–404. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Bellebaum C, Koch B, Schwarz M, Daum I (2008) Focal basal ganglia lesions are associated with impairments in reward-based reversal learning. Brain 131: 829–841 Doi: 10.1093/brain/awn011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54. Graybiel AM (2005) The basal ganglia: learning new tricks and loving it. Curr Opin Neurobiol 15: 638–644. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55. Dahlin E, Neely AS, Larsson A, Backman L, Nyberg L (2008) Transfer of learning after updating training mediated by the striatum. Science 320: 1510–1512 Doi: 10.1126/science.1155466. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56. Brooks DJ (2006) Dopaminergic action beyond its effects on motor function: imaging studies. J Neurol 253 Suppl 4IV8–15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57. Turner RS, Desmurget M (2010) Basal ganglia contributions to motor control: a vigorous tutor. Curr Opin Neurobiol 20: 704–716 Doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2010.08.022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58. Keller SS, Ahrens T, Mohammadi S, Moddel G, Kugel H, et al. (2011) Microstructural and volumetric abnormalities of the putamen in juvenile myoclonic epilepsy. Epilepsia 52: 1715–1724 Doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2011.03117.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59. Jueptner M, Frith CD, Brooks DJ, Frackowiak RS, Passingham RE (1997) Anatomy of motor learning. II. Subcortical structures and learning by trial and error. J Neurophysiol 77: 1325–1337. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60. Lehericy S, Benali H, Van de Moortele PF, Pelegrini-Issac M, Waechter T, et al. (2005) Distinct basal ganglia territories are engaged in early and advanced motor sequence learning. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102: 12566–12571. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61. Genton P (2010) Unverricht-Lundborg disease (EPM1). Epilepsia 51 Suppl 137–39 Doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2009.02441.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62. Magaudda A, Ferlazzo E, Nguyen VH, Genton P (2006) Unverricht-Lundborg disease, a condition with self-limited progression: long-term follow-up of 20 patients. Epilepsia 47: 860–866. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63. DeLong M, Wichmann T (2009) Update on models of basal ganglia function and dysfunction. Parkinsonism Relat Disord 15 suppl 3237–40. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

RESOURCES