Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013 Feb 11;6(2):195–201. doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.112.000132

99mTc-Pyrophosphate scintigraphy for differentiating light-chain cardiac amyloidosis from the transthyretin-related familial and senile cardiac amyloidoses

Sabahat Bokhari 1, Adam Castaño 2, Ted Pozniakoff 1, Susan Deslisle 2, Farhana Latif 2, Mathew S Maurer 2
PMCID: PMC3727049  NIHMSID: NIHMS489785  PMID: 23400849

Abstract

Background

Differentiating immunoglobulin light-chain (AL) from transthyretin-related cardiac amyloidoses (ATTR) is imperative given implications for prognosis, therapy, and genetic counseling. We validated the discriminatory ability of 99mTc-pyrophosphate scintigraphy (99mTc-PYP) in AL vs. TTR-related cardiac amyloidoses.

Methods and Results

45 subjects (12 AL, 16 ATTR wild-type, and 17 ATTR mutants) underwent 99mTc-PYP planar and single-photon positive emission computed tomography (SPECT) cardiac imaging. Scans were performed by experienced nuclear cardiologists blinded to the subjects’ cohort assignment. Cardiac retention was assessed with both a semi-quantitative visual score (range 0, no uptake to 3, diffuse uptake) and by quantitative analysis by drawing a region of interest (ROI) over the heart corrected for contralateral counts and calculating a heart-to-contralateral ratio (H/CL).

Subjects with ATTR cardiac amyloid had a significantly higher semi-quantitative cardiac visual score than the AL cohort (2.9±0.06 vs. 0.8±0.27, p<0.0001) as well as a higher quantitative score (1.80±0.04 vs.1.21±0.04, p<0.0001). Using aH/CL ratio ≥ 1.5 consistent with intensely diffuse myocardial tracer retention had a 97% sensitivity and 100% specificity with area under the curve 0.992, p<0.0001 for identifying ATTR cardiac amyloidosis.

Conclusion

99mTc-PYP cardiac imaging distinguishes AL from ATTR cardiac amyloidosis and may be a simple, widely available method for identifying subjects with ATTR cardiac amyloidosis which should be studied in a larger prospective manner.

Keywords: AL amyloid, ATTR transthyretin cardiomyopathy, technetium, 99m-TcPYP scintigraphy

Introduction

Cardiac amyloidosis is an under appreciated and under-diagnosed cause of heart failure1. While often considered as a single entity attributable to extracellular deposition of fibrillary proteins, there are at least three different pathophysiologic substrates for cardiac amyloidosis that have differing clinical courses and require distinctly different treatment2. In AL cardiac amyloid, the fibrils are composed of immunoglobulin light chains that are produced by a clonal population of plasma cells in the bone marrow. Treatment involves chemotherapeutic agents targeted at the plasma cell. In transthyretin (ATTR) related cardiac amyloidosis, misfolded monomers or dimers of the normally tetrameric transthyretin protein (TTR) from either mutant TTR (ATTRm, also referred to as familial amyloid cardiomyopathy) or wild type TTR (ATTRwt, also known as senile systemic amyloidosis, SSA) deposit in the myocardium. ATTRm is caused by > 100 mutations in the TTR protein that are inherited in an autosomal dominant fashion and can affect individuals of all ages while ATTRwt is predominately described in older adult males.

The most common ATTRm allele in the United States, the valine to isoleucine substitution at position 122 (V122I)3, is found in approximately 3.5% of African Americans 4, 5. ATTRwt cardiomyopathy has been found at autopsy in over 30% of patients with heart failure with a preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) ≥75 years 6. These latter forms of cardiac amyloidosis are becoming increasingly recognized in part due the aging of the population, enhancements in the understanding of the disease’s pathobiology, and the potential benefit from emerging therapies.7

The diagnosis of cardiac amyloidosis, however, and subsequent differentiation of AL from ATTR, remains challenging and misdiagnosis is associated with potential for significant harm.8 Clinically, signs and symptoms of cardiac amyloidosis often overlap with other causes of heart failure, and electrocardiographic and echocardiographic features can be nonspecific. Currently, the gold standard for definitive diagnosis is endomyocardial biopsycoupled with either immunohistochemistry9, 10 or in cases in which this is inconclusive, mass spectroscopy11. Unfortunately, these diagnostic requirements are typically performed only in specialized centers with particular expertise, do not provide sufficient information about the extent or distribution of cardiac amyloidosis, disease progression, or response to treatment, and in practice can lead to delayed care. Additionally, many older adults are reluctant to undergo invasive procedures.

Therefore, a clinical unmet need in this arena is the development of a noninvasive imaging modality that can diagnose cardiac amyloid, differentiate AL from ATTR subtypes, quantify the extent of myocardial amyloid infiltration, and monitor disease progression and response to treatment. Nuclear scintigraphy holds promise for non-invasive diagnosis and has potential as a tool for ongoing follow-up of disease progression. Recent reports from European investigators have demonstrated that 99mTc-DPD scintigraphy is useful in distinguishing AL from ATTR amyloid12 and may have prognostic significance13. However, this isotope is not available for use in the United States. Previous reports regarding the utility of 99mTc-PYP were confounded by the grouping of patients with AL amyloidosis together with ATTR amyloid patients and by the lack of modern quantitative imaging techniques to measure isotope uptake. Accordingly, we aimed to validate the discriminatory ability of 99mTc-PYP in subjects with AL vs. ATTR-related cardiac amyloidosis secondary to wild-type and several different mutant variants, including the most common in the United States, the V122I mutation.

Methods

1. Patient population

Patients with biopsy proven AL or ATTR-related amyloidosis undergoing routine follow-up at the Columbia College of Physicians & Surgeons Center for Advanced Cardiac Care participated in this study. 45 patients (12 AL, 16ATTRwt, and 17ATTRm) were enrolled. Inclusion criteria for the diagnosis of cardiac amyloidosis were one of the following: (a) biopsy proven cardiac amyloidosis (n=37); (b) in the absence of an endomyocardial biopsy, histologic documentation of Congo red staining in at least one involved organ with echocardiographically defined evidence of amyloid cardiomyopathy (thickness of the left ventricular septum or posterior wall of >12 mm without another cause of LVH) (n=5); or (c) documented amyloidogenic TTR mutation by DNA analysis and echocardiographically defined evidence of amyloid cardiomyopathy without evidence of a plasma cell dyscrasia (n=3). Exclusion criteria included women of childbearing potential, minors, inability to provide informed consent, and inability to lie still for 15 minutes under the camera. All patients provided written informed consent. The study protocol was approved by the Columbia Joint Radiation Safety Committee and Institutional Review Board.

2. Study design

This was a single center, blinded, prospective cohort study aimed at evaluating whether 99mTc-PYP could differentiate AL from ATTR cardiac amyloidosis in 45subjects. All subjects underwent a single 99mTc-PYP cardiac imaging scan as described below. Scans were performed and interpreted by experienced nuclear cardiologists blinded to the subjects’ cohort assignment.

3. 99mTc-PYP SPECTs cintigraphy

Planar imaging with 99mTc-PYP was performed with a dual head Philips Precedence SPECT/CT camera (Philips Healthcare, Guildford, United Kingdom) equipped with low energy, high resolution (LEHR) collimators. Patients received 15–25 mCi of 99mTc-PYP intravenously and anterior, lateral, and left anterior oblique planar views were obtained at one hour over 8 minutes duration. The planar images were acquired for a total of 750,000 counts, with the heart centered in the field of view. The acquisition parameters used for planar imaging were 256 × 256 matrix with 1.46 zoom factor. The SPECT imaging was performed if there was myocardial uptake of 99mTc-PYP on planar images. Acquisition parameters for the SPECT imaging were LEHR collimators, matrix 64 × 64 with 1.46 zoom. The Butterworth filter was used with a cutoff of 0.50 and order of 5.00.

For the primary analysis, which was based on myocardial tracer uptake, two methods were used: (1) semi-quantitative visual scoring of cardiac retention (0=absent cardiac uptake, 1=mild uptake less than bone, 2=moderate uptake equal to bone, 3=high uptake greater than bone), and (2) quantitative analysis of heart retention was calculated by drawing a ROI over the heart in the standard manner (Figure 1). A circular ROI was drawn over the heart, copied and mirrored over the contralateral chest to normalize for the spillover from the ribs. Mean total and absolute counts were measured correcting for background counts, and the fraction of mean counts in the heart ROI-to-contralateral chest ROI was calculated as the H/CL ratio.

Figure 1. (A–B). Semi-quantitative method of calculating the distribution of 99mTc-PYP uptake.

Figure 1

Raw images of a representative negative (A) and positive subject (B) are shown 1 hour after radiotracer infusion. ROI circles are depicted in red and the contralateral comparison circle is depicted in blue. ROI = region of interest; C/L = contralateral; Cts = counts; Std Dev = standard deviation.

4. Statistical analyses

Demographic, laboratory, and imaging data were collected and analyzed with descriptive statistics using mean ± standard error for continuous variables and as relative percentages for categorical variables. Statistical analyses were performed using Statistical Analysis Software (SAS; Cary, North Carolina). For comparisons between study subgroups, differences in continuous variables were analyzed using a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA)with post-hoc Bonferroni correction, and differences in categorical variables were analyzed using the χ2 test or when appropriate, Fisher’s exact test. Multivariate logistic regression analysis using a forward selection model was performed to evaluate for factors independently associated with the heart-to-contralateral ratio (H/CL) including group (ATTR vs. AL), age, left ventricular wall thickness, estimate glomerular filtration rate, and calcium levels. All P values used were 2 sided, with P<0.05 considered significant.

Results

1. Demographics of study population

Forty-five patients with cardiac amyloidosis (12 AL, 16 ATTRwt, and 17 ATTRm) were enrolled and completed the study protocol. Of the patients with ATTRm cardiac amyloidosis, the following TTR mutations were included: Val122Ile (n=12), Thr60Ala (n=2), Ser23Asn (n=1), Thr59Lys (n=1) and Ala120Ser (n=1). The demographic, clinical, and echocardiographic features of the three groups are shown in Table 1. Subjects were, on average predominately male (84%) older adults with a mean of 70±2 years-old. Those with ATTRwt were older than those in the AL group (p=0.0008), while those with ATTRm were predominantly African American given the known demographics of the condition and the strong association of the V122I mutation with Black race. At baseline, individuals presented with a phenotype consistent with cardiac amyloidosis as described previously 14. Functionally, these symptoms translated to 31% with New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class III/IV heart failure with an average EF of 45%±2 that did not differ between groups.

Table 1.

Baseline mean clinical, laboratory, and echocardiographic characteristics

Category Total n=45 AL n=12 ATTRwt n=16 ATTRm n=17 P value
Clinical
 Age (Yrs) 70±2 63±3 77±2a 70±3 0.0017
 Male gender (%) 84 75 100 82 0.1483
 White race (%) 60 67 88 29 <0.0001
 African American race (%) 24 0 0 65 <0.0001
 NYHA Functional Class 2.3±0.1 2.4±0.2 2.2±0.2 2.2±0.1 0.65
Laboratory
 Troponin I (ng/mL) 0.3±0.2 0.7±0.6 0.1±0.03 0.1±0.02 0.34
 BNP (pg/mL) 808±103 892±246 720±115 826±182 0.86
 mBMI (gkg/dLm2) 108±4 105±12 108±5 110±5 0.90
 Calcium (mg/dl) 9.3±0.1 9.0±0.7 9.5±0.6 9.5±0.5 0.0391
 Correct Calcium (mg/dl) 9.4±0.1 9.2±0.7 9.3±0.7 9.5±0.4 0.4530
 Creatinine (mg/dl) 1.5±0.1 1.6±0.4 1.7±0.5 1.2±0.4 0.0052
 eGFR (ml/min/m2) 70±4.7 71±30 54±19 86±36 0.0124
Echocardiographic
 Abnormal ECG (%) 89 83 94 88 0.85
 LV ejection fraction (%) 45±2 52±4 48±4 39±4 0.08
 LV end diastolic diameter (cm) 4.2±0.1 4±0.1 4.3±0.2 4.4±0.1 0.45
 Interventricular septal thickness (cm) 1.7±0.06 1.6±0.1 1.9±0.1a,b 1.5±0.1 0.0078
 LV posterior wall thickness (cm) 1.6±0.05 1.6±0.1 1.8±0.1b 1.4±0.1 0.0131
 LV mass (gm/m2) 291±14 255±22 358±24a,b 253±14 0.0014

Continuous data are expressed as mean± SE, and categorical data are expressed as percentages.

a

P<0.05 by ANOVA with Bonferroni correction in comparison to AL.

b

P< 0.05 by ANOVA with Bonferroni correction in comparison to ATTRm.

Assessment of serum biomarkers, troponin I, brain natriuretic peptide (BNP), and modified BMI (mBMI), a reflection of cardiac cachexia15, did not differ between cohorts, suggesting similar degrees of disease severity. Calcium levels were higher in ATTR than AL subjects but when corrected for decrements in albumin (as some subjects with AL amyloid had concomitant nephrotic syndrome with a low serum albumin) differences were no longer observed. Thus, while calcium levels were significantly correlated with the H/CL ratio (r=0.36, p=0.02), there was no correlation for corrected calcium levels (r=0.14, p=0.36).

As previously reported2, subjects with ATTRwt cardiac amyloidosis had significantly increased LV wall thickness and hence greater LV mass compared with AL or ATTRm groups, respectively. A vast majority of subjects across all groups had an abnormal ECG characteristic of amyloidosis evidenced by baseline low-QRS voltage and/or an infarct pattern16, and 20% had a pacemaker defibrillator.

99mTc-PYP SPECT imaging

Representative examples of 99mTc-PYP uptake among subjects and controls are shown in Figure 1. Semi-quantitative visual cardiac scores were significantly higher in patients with ATTR cardiac amyloidosis than in the AL cohort (2.9±0.06 vs. 0.8±0.27, p<0.0001). Two AL patients had more intense uptake than other AL subjects. The first, who was assigned a visual score of 3, had a history of myocardial infarction and was the only subject across groups whose distribution of myocardial uptake was focal. The second, who received a visual score of 2, had no history of myocardial infarction and had diffuse myocardial tracer uptake. One ATTRm patient with an usual TTR mutation (Thr59Lys)but who did not have a thickened myocardium relative to other ATTR patients received a lower than expected visual score of 1.

For quantitative scoring of cardiac tracer uptake (Table 2), subjects with ATTR cardiac amyloidosis had higher absolute counts within the heart ROI than those with AL amyloid (29±2 vs. 22±3, p=0.04) overall but the trend across the three groups was not statistically significant (p=0.11). Accordingly, we indexed the absolute heart ROI counts according to the absolute background counts over the contralateral chest as the heart/contralateral ratio (H/CL). This ratio was significantly higher among ATTR patients as compared with AL patients (1.80±0.04 vs.1.21±0.04) as well and was significant by ANOVA (p<0.0001). ROC curves demonstrated an area of 0.992, p<0.001 for distinguishing ATTR and AL cardiac amyloidosis with a ratio of H/CL≥ 1.5 consistent with intensely diffuse myocardial tracer retention having a 97% sensitivity and 100% specificity for identifying ATTR cardiac amyloidosis (Figure 2). When analyzing heart total counts per ROI, measurements were also significantly greater in ATTR subjects as compared with AL subjects (p=0.001). Heart maximum counts per pixel were also significantly higher in the ATTRm group than in the AL group (p=0.01).

Table 2.

99mTc-PYP SPECT data according to amyloid subtype

Category AL n=12 ATTRwt n=16 ATTRm n=17 P value
Semi-quantitative Visual Cardiac Score (%)
 Score <2 83 0 6 <0.0001
 Score ≥2 17 100 94
Quantitative Cardiac Score (cts)
 Heart absolute cts 21.8±2.7 27.7±0.9 30.4±3.6 0.10
 CL absolute cts 18.1±2.2 15.3±0.6 17.5±2.4 0.48
 H/CL ratio 1.21±0.04 1.84±0.06a 1.77±0.06a <0.0001
 Heart SD mean cts 5.4±0.3 6.5±0.2 6.7±0.5a 0.033
 CL SD mean cts 4.4±0.3 4.6±0.1 4.7±0.4 0.73
 Heart mean max cts/pix 40.2±3.7 52.0±1.8 54.2±4.8a 0.041
 CL mean max cts/pix 35.3±3.1 34.6±0.8 35.5±3.2 0.88
 Heart mean total cts/ROI 38,966±4,528 60,709±4,423a 58,346±4,764a 0.008
 CL mean total cts/ROI 32,132±3,591 33,904±1,724 35,285±3,140 0.72
 Heart mean area ROI (mm2) 4,672±417 5,356±302 5,303±336 0.36
 CL mean area ROI (mm2) 4,619±412 5,295±298 5,262±342 0.36

Continuous data are expressed as mean± SE, and categorical data are expressed as percentages.

Semi-quantitative and quantitative data were obtained 1 hour post 99mTc-PYP infusion.

Cts indicates counts; CL, contralateral; SD, standard deviation; Pix, pixels; ROI, region of interest.

a

P<0.05 by ANOVA with Bonferroni correction in comparison to AL.

Figure 2. Mean heart to contralateral ratio according to amyloid subtype.

Figure 2

Comparison of 99mTc-PYP mean H/CL ratio between patients with AL, ATTRwt, and ATTRm cardiac amyloidosis. AL and transthyretin-related amyloidoses are differentiated by mean H/CL ratio of 1.5. The outlier with H/CL 1.3 is an ATTRm patient with the unusual Thr59Lys mutation. AL = amyloid light-chain; ATTRwt = wild-type transthyretin amyloidosis; ATTRm = mutant transthyretin amyloidosis.

99mTc-PYP myocardial uptake as measured by the H/CL ratio correlated with LV septal wall thickness (0.3172, p=0.04) and with LV mass index (r=0.42828, p=0.007) but not with ejection fraction (r=0.00122 p=0.9938). Furthermore, in multivariate logistic regression analysis adjusted for potentially confounding variables, neither calcium nor measures of renal function were significantly associated with H/CL ratio. Rather, the only independent variable associated with the H/CL ratio was ATTR vs. AL amyloid (OR 9.8, 95% CI 2.6–37.5).

Discussion

The result of this study confirms that 99mTc-PYPcardiac imaging can differentiate ATTR from AL cardiac amyloidosis. Our findings are relevant to the noninvasive differential diagnosis of cardiac amyloidosis, clarify conflicting data in prior reports of bone-seeking radiotracers, and may have clinical implications for non-invasive identification of affected individuals and in the follow-up of disease progression and response to therapy.

Observations during the 1970s and 1980s of myocardial uptake during whole-body planar imaging with bone-seeking radiotracers roused suspicion for cardiac amyloidosis and were subsequently confirmed by tissue biopsy. Various groups went on to investigate the utility of imaging cardiac amyloidosis with different bone-seeking radiotracers including technetium-3,3-diphosphono-1,2-propanodicarboxylic acid (99mTc-DPD), 99m-technetium-methylene diphosphonate (99mTc-MDP), and 99mTc-PYP. The precise mechanism by which these bone-seeking radiotracers accumulate in the myocardium of patients with cardiac amyloidosis remains unclear but may be related to high calcium levels in amyloidosis17, 18. Moreover, the mechanism by which 99mTc-PYP distinguishes ATTR from AL amyloidosis remains to be elucidated. One hypothesis is that 99mTc-PYP may bind TTR amyloid fibrils more intensely than AL fibrils as a result of higher calcium containing compounds in ATTR hearts. Pepys and colleagues observed that the normal human serum amyloid protein P (SAP) binds many different types of amyloid fibrils with a high degree of affinity and in a highly specific calcium-dependent manner 19, 20. Additionally, since SAP self-aggregation is enhanced by the presence of calcium21 and is resistant to proteases in the presence of calcium,22 perhaps varying degrees of calcium in different amyloid subtypes may account for different levels of tissue enhancement. In this population, while calcium levels did differ between cohorts and were higher in ATTR subjects than AL, when calcium was corrected for decrements in albumin (as some subjects with AL amyloid had concomitant nephrotic syndrome with a low serum albumin) differences were no longer observed. Thus, while calcium levels were significantly correlated with the H/CL ratio (r=0.36, p=0.02), there was no correlation for corrected calcium levels (r=0.14, p=0.36). Furthermore, in multivariate analysis neither calcium nor measures of renal function were significantly associated with H/CL ratio. The only independent variable associated with the H/CL ratio was ATTR vs. AL amyloid (OR 9.8, 95% CI 2.6–37.5).

Another theory that may explain the mechanism of myocardial enhancement in ATTR subjects proposes that the intensity of 99mTc-PYP binding relates to the duration over which amyloid deposition has occurred in the affected tissue. In AL patients, fibrils tend to accumulate over shorter time periods than in ATTR patients, whose disease course is typically more indolent. Accordingly, the characteristics of amyloidogenic fibrils in patients with ATTR cardiac amyloid may differ from those of AL amyloid thereby resulting in higher levels of 99mTc-PYP uptake. Finally, it has not escaped our attention that the degree of amyloid infiltration in the myocardium may influence the H/CL ratio. However, multivariate analysis in our population did not show that wall thickness was independently associated with 99mTc-PYP uptake, rather this was related to amyloid subtype.

Results from early technetium isotope studies may differ from ours due to inconsistent differentiation between AL and ATTR, lack of a quantitative measure of tracer retention (assessment have usually been semi-quantitative), and improvements in imaging techniques and quality since the 1980s. Of the bone isotopes employed for non-invasive identification of cardiac amyloid, 99mTc-DPD has been the most studied to date. Perugini et al. demonstrated that in 25 patients with cardiac amyloidosis (15 ATTR and 10 AL), all 15 ATTR patients had strong myocardial uptake of 99mTc-DPD while no uptake was observed in AL patients suggesting that 99mTc-DPD myocardial uptake was 100% sensitive and 100% specific for diagnosing ATTR cardiac amyloidosis 12. However, in a larger cohort of 79 patients (45 ATTR and 34 AL) where tracer retention was calculated by a heart-to-whole body ratio (H/WB), the diagnostic accuracy of99mTc-DPD scintigraphy was found to be lower than previously reported due to unexpected tracer uptake in about one third of AL patients. Further studies demonstrated that in ATTR subjects, 99mTc-DPD myocardial uptake is of prognostic value for predicting major adverse cardiac events (MACE), either alone or in combination with LV wall thickness13. Therefore, it appears that 99mTc-DPD scanning can assist in the differential diagnosis of ATTR and AL cardiac amyloidosis when tracer retention is either intense or absent, respectively (intermediate 99mTc-DPD myocardial uptake was concluded to be of indeterminate significance), and has prognostic significance, leading to its widespread use among amyloid centers in Europe. However, this isotope is not approved by the Food and Drug Administration and thus is not available for clinical use in the United States. Regarding other radiotracers,99mTc-MDP has been employed in several case reports and small studies for the diagnosis of cardiac amyloidosis, but has demonstrated lower sensitivity than with 99mTc-PYP23, 24.

Several case reports and larger studies dating back to the 1980s have described the utility of 99mTc-PYP, as used in this study, in identifying cardiac amyloidosis 2, 2532. However, 99mTc-PYP scintigraphy has not yet been established for the non-invasive evaluation of cardiac amyloidosis for several reasons: results to-date have been in large part conflicting and with variable sensitivity; amyloid subtype was not defined in many of the early studies and those that defined it were limited to ATTRwt patients only, missing the most common ATTRm allele in the United States, V122I;3 and finally, most studies have analyzed scans using a semi-quantitative visual scoring system, not a quantitative method. In a 1982 report, intensely diffuse cardiac uptake of 99mTc-PYP was reported in all 10 subjects with biopsy proven cardiac amyloidosis, suggesting that 99mTc-PYP scintigraphy might function as a useful adjunct to biopsy and echocardiographic imaging in the diagnosis of amyloid heart disease. However, amyloid subtype was not defined in this study31. In a larger study in 34 patients all of whom had biopsy proven amyloidosis but where subtype was not defined and not all subjects had cardiac involvement, only 3 of 14 retrospectively reviewed cases had intense 99mTc-PYP myocardial uptake and 17 of 20 prospectively reviewed cases had abnormal scans29. Of these 17, 14 had only mild uptake, which was similar to 15 of 20 control subjects. Based on these results, 99mTc-PYP was judged not to be sufficiently sensitive to warrant routine screening in patients with cardiac amyloidosis. However, in addition to the above mentioned limitations, this study did not measure myocardial tracer uptake in a quantitative fashion (only semi-quantitatively).

Most recently, Yamamoto et al. described a quantitative method, the “PYP score”, to assess the utility of 99mTc-PYP to evaluate for cardiac amyloidosis in 13 subjects with heart failure due to amyloid (1 AL, 3 ATTRm, 8 ATTRwt) and 37 subjects with heart failure due to non-amyloid causes33. PYP score, defined as the ratio of myocardial mean counts to ventricular cavity mean counts, was found to have a sensitivity of 84.6% and specificity of 94.5% for distinguishing cardiac amyloidosis from non-amyloid causes of heart failure. However, to the best of our knowledge, no study has compared AL subjects against ATTRwt and ATTRm groups using99mTc-PYP and the quantitative methodology we describe here. Our study sheds light on the fact that while AL subjects may indeed have mild uptake with varying degrees of sensitivity compared with normal controls, quantification of counts using standard ROI technique adjusted for background counts over the contralateral chest as a H/CL ratio provides a sensitive and specific numerical index for the diagnosis of and differentiation between AL (H/CL< 1.5) and ATTR (H/CL≥1.5) cardiac amyloidosis.

This technique, while sensitive and specific is not perfect as demonstrated by a single AL subject who had increased focal tracer retention that was due to a previous myocardial infarction and a single ATTR subject with a false negative scan result with minimal increase in wall thickness due to the unusual TTR mutation, Thr59Lys. Accordingly, qualitative analyses to identify diffuse versus focal uptake, the latter of which is characteristic of a myocardial infarction, has added clinical value to quantitative and semi-quantitative approaches. Understanding that unrecognized myocardial infarction is a known reason for technetium uptake in the myocardium34 is essential so that potential contributors to false elevated visual scores are identified. Additionally, the association of uptake with wall thickness and LV mass in studies of 99mTc-DPD35 suggests that non-invasive identification of ATTR cardiac amyloidosis is dependent on the magnitude of myocardial amyloid infiltration and that intense 99mTc-PYP uptake reflects a thick-walled heart seen in advanced stages of cardiac amyloidosis. Notably, wall thickness was not that dissimilar in our AL cohort compared with ATTRm (IVS 1.6cm vs.1.5cm, respectively), yet H/CL ratio was significantly higher in ATTRm patients, suggesting that 99mTc-PYP possesses a unique affinity for the TTR fibril. Regardless, this approach may not be useful for early identification of cardiac amyloidosis in affected individuals with less severe phenotypes. Further work is needed to examine whether 99mTc-PYP has diagnostic utility in genotype positive phenotype negative individuals with TTR mutations and if this technique is useful in monitoring disease progression and even response to therapy.

While reliable confirmation of amyloid is important, diagnosis of the specific etiologic subtype early in the disease course is essential for improving outcomes since all current therapies for ATTR amyloid are targeted at preventing further deposition of amyloid fibrils but do not remove fibrils from the myocardium. In a previous study that examined clinical features and outcomes in 58 ATTR patients, we found that despite the ability to test for the V122I allele, these patients typically present later and at a more advanced stage of cardiac disease than ATTRwt subjects in whom serologic testing for early diagnosis is not available36. 99mTc-PYP scanning may facilitate earlier differentiation of AL and ATTR cardiac amyloidosis while arrangements for confirmatory tissue biopsy are underway. Further prospective studies using the imaging technique and H/CL ratio ≥ 1.5 determined to be sensitive and specific for ATTR cardiac amyloidosis are warranted.

Several limitations to our investigation are worth noting. This was a small single center study. However, to the best of our knowledge, this is the largest study to-date with AL, ATTRwt, and ATTRm etiologic subtypes that specifically focused on the utility of 99mTc-PYP cardiac imaging. A large percentage of the ATTRm subjects had the V122I mutation, the most common ATTRm allele in the United States. Future studies in larger cohorts that include the spectrum of TTR mutations will determine the utility of this technique in identifying cardiac involvement in other TTR mutations, though our preliminary data suggests excellent performance irrespective of mutation. The generalizability of these results to other populations is unknown. Indeed, many of these subjects enrolled had severe phenotypes with markedly thickened left ventricular walls, which while similar to other cohorts of patients with cardiac amyloidosis37, may be characterized by enhanced uptake of technetium pyrophosphate. Future studies will need to evaluate the utility of this approach to prospectively identify patients with ATTR cardiac amyloidosis with less severe phenotypes. The cross sectional nature of this study and the absence of serial scanning provides no information on the ability of this technique to monitor progression of disease over time, but this is a focus on ongoing investigation. Finally, the mechanism by which 99mTc-PYP binds to ATTR more than AL fibrillar deposits remains to be elucidated.

In conclusion, 99mTc-PYP SPECT is able to distinguish AL from ATTR cardiac amyloidosis and may be a simple, widely available method for identifying subjects with ATTR cardiac amyloidosis which should be studied in a larger prospective manner.

Acknowledgments

We would like to acknowledge the patients with cardiac amyloidosis who participated in this study and who continue to hope for methods to improve outcomes including earlier and more efficient diagnosis and better therapeutics.

Sources of Funding

Pfizer, Inc. provided a restricted grant to support the imaging performed as part of this study.

Abbreviations

AL

amyloid light-chain

ATTR

transthyretin amyloidosis

EF

ejection fraction

HFpEF

heart failure preserved ejection fraction

ROI

region of interest

SPECT

single-photon positive emission computed tomography

99mTc-PYP

technetium pyrophosphate

Footnotes

Disclosures

Dr. Maurer serves on the Executive Board of THAOS (Transthyretin Amyloid Outcomes Survey) an international registry of patients with ATTR amyloidosis that is funded by FoldRx Pharmaceuticals, Inc, a wholly owned subsidiary of Pfizer, Inc.

References

  • 1.Dharmarajan K, Maurer MS. Transthyretin cardiac amyloidoses in older north americans. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2012;60:765–774. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2011.03868.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Rapezzi C, Merlini G, Quarta CC, Riva L, Longhi S, Leone O, Salvi F, Ciliberti P, Pastorelli F, Biagini E, Coccolo F, Cooke RM, Bacchi-Reggiani L, Sangiorgi D, Ferlini A, Cavo M, Zamagni E, Fonte ML, Palladini G, Salinaro F, Musca F, Obici L, Branzi A, Perlini S. Systemic cardiac amyloidoses: Disease profiles and clinical courses of the 3 main types. Circulation. 2009;120:1203–1212. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.843334. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Connors LH, Lim A, Prokaeva T, Roskens VA, Costello CE. Tabulation of human transthyretin (ttr) variants, 2003. Amyloid: the international journal of experimental and clinical investigation: the official journal of the International Society of Amyloidosis. 2003;10:160–184. doi: 10.3109/13506120308998998. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Jacobson DR, Gorevic PD, Buxbaum JN. A homozygous transthyretin variant associated with senile systemic amyloidosis: Evidence for a late-onset disease of genetic etiology. American journal of human genetics. 1990;47:127–136. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Jacobson DR, Pastore RD, Yaghoubian R, Kane I, Gallo G, Buck FS, Buxbaum JN. Variant-sequence transthyretin (isoleucine 122) in late-onset cardiac amyloidosis in black americans. The New England journal of medicine. 1997;336:466–473. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199702133360703. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Mirzoyev SA, Edwards WD, Mohammed SF, Donovan JL, Roger VL, Grogan DR, Redfield MM. Cardiac amyloid deposition is common in elderly patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction. Circulation. 2010;122:A17926. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Falk RH, Dubrey SW. Amyloid heart disease. Progress in cardiovascular diseases. 2010;52:347–361. doi: 10.1016/j.pcad.2009.11.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Lachmann HJ, Booth DR, Booth SE, Bybee A, Gilbertson JA, Gillmore JD, Pepys MB, Hawkins PN. Misdiagnosis of hereditary amyloidosis as al (primary) amyloidosis. The New England journal of medicine. 2002;346:1786–1791. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa013354. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Satoskar AA, Efebera Y, Hasan A, Brodsky S, Nadasdy G, Dogan A, Nadasdy T. Strong transthyretin immunostaining: Potential pitfall in cardiac amyloid typing. Am J Surg Pathol. 2011;35:1685–1690. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0b013e3182263d74. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Chee CE, Lacy MQ, Dogan A, Zeldenrust SR, Gertz MA. Pitfalls in the diagnosis of primary amyloidosis. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2010;10:177–180. doi: 10.3816/CLML.2010.n.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Vrana JA, Gamez JD, Madden BJ, Theis JD, Bergen HR, 3rd, Dogan A. Classification of amyloidosis by laser microdissection and mass spectrometry-based proteomic analysis in clinical biopsy specimens. Blood. 2009;114:4957–4959. doi: 10.1182/blood-2009-07-230722. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Perugini E, Guidalotti PL, Salvi F, Cooke RM, Pettinato C, Riva L, Leone O, Farsad M, Ciliberti P, Bacchi-Reggiani L, Fallani F, Branzi A, Rapezzi C. Noninvasive etiologic diagnosis of cardiac amyloidosis using 99mtc-3,3-diphosphono-1,2-propanodicarboxylic acid scintigraphy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;46:1076–1084. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.05.073. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Rapezzi C, Quarta CC, Guidalotti PL, Pettinato C, Fanti S, Leone O, Ferlini A, Longhi S, Lorenzini M, Reggiani LB, Gagliardi C, Gallo P, Villani C, Salvi F. Role of (99m)tc-dpd scintigraphy in diagnosis and prognosis of hereditary transthyretin-related cardiac amyloidosis. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2011;4:659–670. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2011.03.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Rapezzi C, Quarta CC, Riva L, Longhi S, Gallelli I, Lorenzini M, Ciliberti P, Biagini E, Salvi F, Branzi A. Transthyretin-related amyloidoses and the heart: A clinical overview. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2010;7:398–408. doi: 10.1038/nrcardio.2010.67. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Suhr O, Danielsson A, Holmgren G, Steen L. Malnutrition and gastrointestinal dysfunction as prognostic factors for survival in familial amyloidotic polyneuropathy. J Intern Med. 1994;235:479–485. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2796.1994.tb01106.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Murtagh B, Hammill SC, Gertz MA, Kyle RA, Tajik AJ, Grogan M. Electrocardiographic findings in primary systemic amyloidosis and biopsy-proven cardiac involvement. Am J Cardiol. 2005;95:535–537. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2004.10.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Chen W, Dilsizian V. Molecular imaging of amyloidosis: Will the heart be the next target after the brain? Curr Cardiol Rep. 2012;14:226–233. doi: 10.1007/s11886-011-0239-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Janssen S, Piers DA, van Rijswijk MH, Meijer S, Mandema E. Soft-tissue uptake of 99mtc-diphosphonate and 99mtc-pyrophosphate in amyloidosis. Eur J Nucl Med. 1990;16:663–670. doi: 10.1007/BF00998166. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Pepys MB, Dyck RF, de Beer FC, Skinner M, Cohen AS. Binding of serum amyloid p-component (sap) by amyloid fibrils. Clin Exp Immunol. 1979;38:284–293. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Hawkins PN, Myers MJ, Lavender JP, Pepys MB. Diagnostic radionuclide imaging of amyloid: Biological targeting by circulating human serum amyloid p component. Lancet. 1988;1:1413–1418. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(88)92235-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Nielsen EH, Sorensen IJ, Vilsgaard K, Andersen O, Svehag SE. Calcium-enhanced aggregation of serum amyloid p component and its inhibition by the ligands heparin and heparan sulphate. An electron microscopic and immunoelectrophoretic study. APMIS. 1994;102:420–426. doi: 10.1111/j.1699-0463.1994.tb04893.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Hamazaki H. Ca(2+)-dependent binding of human serum amyloid p component to alzheimer’s beta-amyloid peptide. J Biol Chem. 1995;270:10392–10394. doi: 10.1074/jbc.270.18.10392. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Hongo M, Yamada H, Okubo S, Hirayama J, Fujii T, Kusama S, Ikeda S. cardiac involvement in systemic amyloidosis: Myocardial scintigraphic evaluation. J Cardiogr. 1985;15:163–180. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Ak I, Vardareli E, Erdinc O, Kasapoglu E, Ata N. Myocardial tc-99m mdp uptake on a bone scan in senile systemic amyloidosis with cardiac involvement. Clin Nucl Med. 2000;25:826–827. doi: 10.1097/00003072-200010000-00019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Falk RH, Lee VW, Rubinow A, Hood WB, Jr, Cohen AS. Sensitivity of technetium-99m-pyrophosphate scintigraphy in diagnosing cardiac amyloidosis. The American journal of cardiology. 1983;51:826–830. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(83)80140-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Kula RW, Engel WK, Line BR. Scanning for soft-tissue amyloid. Lancet. 1977;1:92–93. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(77)91102-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Eriksson P, Backman C, Bjerle P, Eriksson A, Holm S, Olofsson BO. Non-invasive assessment of the presence and severity of cardiac amyloidosis. A study in familial amyloidosis with polyneuropathy by cross sectional echocardiography and technetium-99m pyrophosphate scintigraphy. British heart journal. 1984;52:321–326. doi: 10.1136/hrt.52.3.321. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Karp K, Naslund U, Backman C, Eriksson P. Technetium-99m pyrophosphate single-photon emission computed tomography of the heart in familial amyloid polyneuropathy. International journal of cardiology. 1987;14:365–369. doi: 10.1016/0167-5273(87)90209-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Gertz MA, Brown ML, Hauser MF, Kyle RA. Utility of technetium tc 99m pyrophosphate bone scanning in cardiac amyloidosis. Archives of internal medicine. 1987;147:1039–1044. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Castano A, Bokhari S, Brannagan TH, Wynn J, Maurer MS. Technetium pyrophosphate myocardial uptake and peripheral neuropathy in a rare variant of familial transthyretin (ttr) amyloidosis (ser23asn): A case report and literature review. Amyloid. 2012;19(1):41–6. doi: 10.3109/13506129.2011.638682. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Wizenberg TA, Muz J, Sohn YH, Samlowski W, Weissler AM. Value of positive myocardial technetium-99m-pyrophosphate scintigraphy in the noninvasive diagnosis of cardiac amyloidosis. Am Heart J. 1982;103:468–473. doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(82)90331-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Lachmann HJ, Booth DR, Booth SE, Bybee A, Gilbertson JA, Gillmore JD, Pepys MB, Hawkins PN. Misdiagnosis of hereditary amyloidosis as al (primary) amyloidosis. N Engl J Med. 2002;346:1786–1791. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa013354. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Yamamoto Y, Onoguchi M, Haramoto M, Kodani N, Komatsu A, Kitagaki H, Tanabe K. Novel method for quantitative evaluation of cardiac amyloidosis using (201)tlcl and (99m)tc-pyp spect. Ann Nucl Med. 2012t;26(8):634–43. doi: 10.1007/s12149-012-0627-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Willerson JT, Parkey RW, Bonte FJ, Meyer SL, Atkins JM, Stokley EM. Technetium stannous pyrophosphate myocardial scintigrams in patients with chest pain of varying etiology. Circulation. 1975;51:1046–1052. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.51.6.1046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Rapezzi C, Guidalotti P, Salvi F, Riva L, Perugini E. Usefulness of 99mtc-dpd scintigraphy in cardiac amyloidosis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;51:1509–1510. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.12.038. author reply 1510. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Russo CGP, Maurer MS. Comparison of v122i and senile cardiac amyloidosis: Differences in clinical features and outcomes. XIIIth International Symposium on Amyloidosis, OP 52; [accessed January 9, 2013]. p. 62. http://wencke4.housing.rug.nl/documenten/medici/Internationale_Conferenties/SY_Amyloidosis%202012/documents/ISAabstractbook2012.pdf. [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Rapezzi C, Quarta CC, Guidalotti PL, Longhi S, Pettinato C, Leone O, Ferlini A, Salvi F, Gallo P, Gagliardi C, Branzi A. Usefulness and limitations of 99mtc-3,3-diphosphono-1,2-propanodicarboxylic acid scintigraphy in the aetiological diagnosis of amyloidotic cardiomyopathy. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2011;38:470–478. doi: 10.1007/s00259-010-1642-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES