Skip to main content
Bioengineered logoLink to Bioengineered
. 2013 Apr 25;4(4):212–223. doi: 10.4161/bioe.24761

How to achieve high-level expression of microbial enzymes

Strategies and perspectives

Long Liu 1,2,, Haiquan Yang 1,2,, Hyun-dong Shin 3, Rachel R Chen 3, Jianghua Li 1,2, Guocheng Du 1,2,*, Jian Chen 4,*
PMCID: PMC3728192  PMID: 23686280

Abstract

Microbial enzymes have been used in a large number of fields, such as chemical, agricultural and biopharmaceutical industries. The enzyme production rate and yield are the main factors to consider when choosing the appropriate expression system for the production of recombinant proteins. Recombinant enzymes have been expressed in bacteria (e.g., Escherichia coli, Bacillus and lactic acid bacteria), filamentous fungi (e.g., Aspergillus) and yeasts (e.g., Pichia pastoris). The favorable and very advantageous characteristics of these species have resulted in an increasing number of biotechnological applications. Bacterial hosts (e.g., E. coli) can be used to quickly and easily overexpress recombinant enzymes; however, bacterial systems cannot express very large proteins and proteins that require post-translational modifications. The main bacterial expression hosts, with the exception of lactic acid bacteria and filamentous fungi, can produce several toxins which are not compatible with the expression of recombinant enzymes in food and drugs. However, due to the multiplicity of the physiological impacts arising from high-level expression of genes encoding the enzymes and expression hosts, the goal of overproduction can hardly be achieved, and therefore, the yield of recombinant enzymes is limited. In this review, the recent strategies used for the high-level expression of microbial enzymes in the hosts mentioned above are summarized and the prospects are also discussed. We hope this review will contribute to the development of the enzyme-related research field.

Keywords: microbial enzymes, expression, Escherichia coli, Bacillus subtilis, yeast, filamentous fungi, lactic acid bacteria

Introduction

Native and recombinant enzymes benefit major sectors of the biopharmaceutical, agricultural and chemical industries. Products of these industries, in turn, augment the fields of medicine, diagnostics, food, nutrition, detergents, textiles, leather, paper, pulp and plastics.1 Enzymes are synthesized by all living organisms as part of their natural metabolism, serving as biocatalysts to increase the rate of the metabolic reactions. The enzyme production rate, yield, quality and functionality are the most important factors to be considered when industrial recombinant enzymes are produced in hosts.2

The choice of an expression system for the high-level production of recombinant enzymes depends on many factors. These include cell growth characteristics, expression levels, intracellular and extracellular expression, post-translational modifications and biological activity of the protein of interest, as well as regulatory issues in the production of the therapeutic proteins.3 Moreover, the cost breakdown in terms of process and design and other economic considerations is required for the selection of a particular expression system.4 Recombinant enzymes have been expressed in Escherichia coli, Bacilli (e.g., Bacillus subtilis) and lactic acid bacteria (e.g., Lactobacillus lactis), filamentous fungi (e.g., Aspergillus) and yeasts (e.g., Pichia pastoris).5-9 Bacterial expression systems remain very attractive due to their ability to grow rapidly and at high density on inexpensive substrates, their well-characterized genetics and the availability of an increasingly large number of cloning vectors and mutant host strains.10 The advent of recombinant DNA technology has revolutionized strategies for protein production. Due to the well-characterized genome and a variety of mature tools available for genetic manipulation, E. coli is still the most common workhorse for recombinant protein production.1,10,11 However, despite the extensive knowledge on the genetics and molecular biology of E. coli, not every gene can be efficiently expressed in this organism.

Due to the multiplicity of physiological impacts arising from high-level gene expression and host strains, the overproduction goal can hardly be achieved, and therefore, the yield of recombinant enzymes is limited. The mechanistic link between the stress response and deteriorated culture performance of most host stains is still not completely understood. Most of the genetic strategies for engineering the cell physiology developed thus far are still limited to single-gene manipulation and their feasibility appears to be target-protein dependent. Another bioprocess obstacle is the lack of suitable techniques for monitoring the cell physiology during the course of cultivation. The goal of this review was to integrate the extensively published literature on gene expression in microbial hosts to focus on expression systems and experimental approaches useful for the overproduction of proteins and to review recent progresses in this field.

Strategies for Achieving High-Level Expression of Microbial Enzymes in E. coli

The regulation of recombinant protein expression is a complex system consisting of interaction elements. The expression plasmid is important for the expression of a particular recombinant protein. However, the construction of an expression plasmid requires several elements, the configuration of which is crucial for the highest levels of the enzyme synthesis.3 The essential elements of an E. coli expression vector include the promoter, ribosome-binding site (RBS), transcription terminator and copy number. Among them, the promoter is positioned approximately 10–100 bp upstream of the RBS and is under the control of a regulatory gene. The promoters of E. coli consist of a hexanucleotide sequence located approximately 35 bp upstream of the transcription initiation base (-35 region) separated by a short spacer from another hexanucleotide sequence (-10 region).12 The transcription terminator is located downstream of the coding sequence and serves both as a signal to terminate the transcription and as a protective element composed of stem-loop structures, protecting the mRNA from exonucleolytic degradation and extending the mRNA half-life.13 Additionally, the copy number of the plasmid is determined by the origin of replication.14 The use of runaway replicons resulted in a massive amplification of plasmid-encoded proteins.15 There are several strategies for achieving high-level expression of recombinant proteins in E. coli (Fig. 1).

graphic file with name bbug-4-212-g1.jpg

Figure 1. Systems-level engineering strategies to achieve high-level expression of recombinant proteins.

High-level expression of enzymes by transcriptional regulation in E. coli

A promoter suitable for high-level protein synthesis must be strong, and its tight regulation is essential for the synthesis of proteins that may be detrimental to the host E. coli.3,16 The most widely used promoters for large-scale protein production are thermal or chemical inducers.17-19 Cold-responsive promoters have been shown to facilitate efficient gene expression at reduced temperatures. The activity of the phage λPL promoter is highest at 20°C and declines as the temperature is raised.20 The rationale behind the use of cold-responsive promoters for gene expression is based on the proposition that the rate of protein folding will be only slightly affected at 15–20°C. This will provide sufficient time for protein refolding, yielding active proteins and avoiding the formation of inactive protein aggregates.

In prokaryotes, the transcription termination is affected by two different types of mechanisms: rho-dependent transcription termination and rho-independent termination.3 Since they serve several important functions, efficient transcription terminators are indispensable elements of expression vectors. The transcription terminators enhance mRNA stability and can substantially increase the level of protein production.21 However, the antiterminator element that enables RNA polymerase to override a rho-dependent terminator in the rRNA operons has been identified and is referred to as boxA. It is believed that the use of the antitermination elements is useful in the expression of heterologous genes in E. coli. The transcriptional antitermination region from the E. coli rrnB rRNA operon has been used in the expression vector pSE420, which utilizes the trc promoter.22

The advantages of tightly regulated promoters are that they enable the design of many ingenious and highly repressible expression systems. The approaches of the tightly regulation about promoters include the employment of regulatory elements of the Pseudomonas putida F1 cym and cmt operons to control target expression at the transcriptional level by using p-isopropylbenzoate (cumate) as an inducer,23 use of a “plating” method,24,25 the increase of the repressor-to-operator ratio, induction by infection with mutant phage,26,27 attenuation of promoter strength on high-copy-number vectors,28 use of transcription terminators in combination with antiterminators,29 use of an inducible promoter within a copy-number-controllable plasmid,30 “cross-regulation” systems, co-transformation of plasmids utilizing the SP6 RNA polymerase,31 and use of antisense RNA complementary to the mRNA of the cloned gene.32 The above approaches have provided important tools for the armamentarium of gene expression.

High-level expression of enzymes by translational regulation in E. coli

The determinants of protein synthesis initiation are difficult to decipher. In E. coli, AUG is the preferred codon by two- or 3-fold, while GUG is only slightly better than UUG.33,34 The secondary structure at the translation initiation region of mRNA plays an important role in the efficiency of gene expression.35-38 Upon addition of the cap analog, the translation from the 5′-terminal region of p53 mRNA is enhanced,35 and the level of lacZ expression increases with the increase in the loop size of the local mRNA.39

The SD and other sequences in the mRNA are important for an efficient translation. The translation was enhanced upon interaction with bases 485–466 of the 16S rRNA.40 One of the translation enhancers was the U-rich sequences in the 5′-untranslated region (UTR) of the mRNAs.41 Significant enrichment was observed for U-rich motifs within 100 nucleotides downstream of 5′ splice sites, if both classes of exons with the highest enrichment were located between positions +6 and +30.41,42

The mRNA stability also plays an essential role in maintaining critical cellular levels of a given protein in E. coli.43 It was indicated that the stability of mRNA in a cell-free extract could be controlled using engineered T7 terminator sequences, and the relative expression level of target proteins could be manipulated by employing the T7 terminator of adjusted stem lengths.44 The design of expression vectors frequently includes the insertion of all three stop codons to prevent possible ribosome skipping. The termination efficiencies significantly vary depending on both the stop codon and the fourth nucleotide, ranging from 80% (UAAU) to 7% (UGAC); therefore, the UAA stop codon is preferred in E. coli.3 The increase of the activity of the prokaryotic release factor RF3, a stimulatory protein, can markedly improve the efficiency in decoding strong stop signals in vivo.45

Enhancement of the expression of enzymes by different protein formations in E. coli

Inclusion bodies are significant cytoplasmic aggregates. Several experimental approaches have been used to reduce the formation of inclusion bodies and improve protein folding. Among others, these include culture at lower temperatures,46 expression of DnaK/DnaJ (Hsp70),47 selection of different E. coli strains,48 change of pH,49 a diminished hydrophobic effect at elevated pressures,50 molecular chaperones,51,52 regulation of cytosolic Ca2+,53 limiting growth conditions,54 and co-expression.55,56

The oxidative environment of the periplasm has the important function of facilitating the proper folding of proteins. The cleavage of signal peptides in vivo during translocation to the periplasm is more likely to yield the authentic N-terminus of the target protein. Strategies for the improvement of the translocation of proteins to the periplasm include the supply of components involved in protein transport and processing: overproduction of the signal peptidase I,57 co-expression of the prlA4 and secE genes,58 deletion of the twin-arginine translocation motif,59 type III secretion chaperone (Chlamydia trachomatis Slc 1),60 mutations in secY,61 and addition of endoplasmic reticulum (KDEL) or Golgi (YQRL) retention sequences.62

The expression of enzymes into culture media is preferred due to several advantages such as simplified downstream processing, high expression level, simpler purification, improved protein folding and level of proteolysis.63 However, E. coli secretes few proteins and the manipulation of the various transport pathways to facilitate secretion of foreign proteins is an important task. In order to improve the protein secretion the limited leakage of the outer membrane was induced. The reported strategies include the optimization64,65 and mutation of signal peptides,66 the overexpression of the twin-arginine translocation (Tat) ABC,67 the synergistic use of EDTA and lysozyme,68 the addition of detergents,69 periplasmic chaperones,70 fusion proteins,71 SDS, glycine, Ca2+ or Na+,72 the delayed supplementation of glycine,73 translation engineering,74 and the employment of the 19-residue pro-peptide of staphylococcal nuclease.75

Improving the yield of enzymes by fusion proteins or molecular chaperones in E. coli

Several fusion proteins have been used for improving the high-level production of enzymes. The remarkable increase in protein yield is thought to be due to the protection of the target protein from proteolysis, improved folding and the presence of regulatory regions in the T7 polymerase gene, thus enhancing the expression level of transmembrane proteins and efficient mRNA translation. Among others, fusions with the glia cell stimulating factor (GSF) were used for improving the production of different target recombinant proteins.76 The aquaporin Z (AqpZ) expression was improved by fusion with TrxA in E. coli.77 The expression of recombinant proteins as fusions with the small ubiquitin-related modifier (SUMO) protein significantly increased the yield of difficult-to-express proteins in E. coli.78 Rice protein expression was improved by fusion with thioredoxin at the N-terminus in E. coli.79 Additionally, it was noted that the expression of poorly expressed heterologous genes was improved by translational fusion with fragments of the trpE gene.80

Molecular chaperones can assist the folding of proteins in the cell under normal and stress conditions.81 It is especially difficult to heterologously produce some enzymes in E. coli and the use of molecular chaperones could reduce their aggregation tendency and provide higher yields of correctly folded, biologically active proteins. The combined use of molecular chaperones and target proteins from the same species is another strategy that has been successfully employed, as exemplified in the case of the production of the soluble gp37 by co-expression with two bacteriophage T4-encoded chaperones in a two-vector system in E. coli.82 Moreover, the heterologous production of the antimalarial drug target GTP cyclohydrolase I (PfGCHI) was improved by co-expressing the Plasmodium falciparum molecular chaperone (PfHsp70).83

High-level expression of enzymes by codon optimization in E. coli

Heterologous protein production in E. coli may be diminished by biased codon usage. The expression of enzyme genes in E. coli shows a non-random usage of synonymous codons.84 The competition for rare tRNA may also adversely affect the expression of host genes or elicit a stringent response.85 The arginine codons AGA and AGG are particularly rare in E. coli, and they have been shown to cause mis-translational errors as well as lower protein expression.86 Codon optimization could improve the translational fidelity and thus enhance the expression of enzymes.87 The codon bias can be mitigated by targeted mutagenesis to change rare to more commonly used codons or by co-expressing genes that encode the tRNA. The codon-optimized and mRNA secondary structure-free sequences could be obtained by synthesis of complete genes.84 The heterologous expression of numerous genes was improved by synthetic DNA.84,88-90 Moreover, the expression of genes with rare codons could be rescued by co-expression of rare cognate tRNA genes.91,92

Fermentation optimization of enzyme production in E. coli

The production of enzymes in E. coli can be greatly improved by the use of high-density culture systems. The methods achieving high cell concentration include batch, fed-batch and continuous cultures.93-97 The composition of the growth medium must be optimized and monitored because it significantly affects the metabolic effects on both the cells and enzyme production.93,95 Nutrient composition and fermentation variables such as temperature, pH and other parameters affect the production levels of enzymes.93,98 However, high-cell-density culture suffers from several factors such as limited availability of dissolved oxygen at a high cell density and high carbon dioxide levels. The resulting decreased growth rates enhance acetate formation and reduce the mixing efficiency. The accumulation of acetate is a problem in the production of recombinant protein at high cell density culture. The acetolactate synthase introduced into E. coli by metabolic engineering reduces acetate accumulation and improves the production of recombinant enzymes.99 Nutrient consumption rate and CO2 production rate are also important factors affecting the expression level of enzymes.95

High-Level Expression of Microbial Enzymes in Bacilli

As well as E. coli, gram-positive Bacilli strains are popular organisms for recombinant enzyme production. Compared with the well-known E. coli, Bacilli strains have a high secretion capacity and can export proteins directly into the extracellular medium. Furthermore, few enzymes expressed in the Bacilli strains are isomerized.100

High-level expression of microbial enzymes in B. subtilis

B. subtilis is an interesting alternative system for heterologous gene expression. The ability of secreting proteins directly into the medium is one of its greatest advantages. A number of expression systems for heterologous protein production have been constructed. After comparison of different B. subtilis expression systems, it was found that the subtilin-regulated gene expression (SURE) system was the most efficient expression system and was suitable for the expression of membrane protein complexes.101 Several recombinant enzymes were expressed in the B. subtilis expression system.9,101-103 The alkaline α-amylase from B. alcalophilus was overproduced in B. subtilis WB600 using the vector pMA5, and its titer was 79 times higher than that in the wild-type host.9 Individual secretion machinery components with their special functions are involved in the total flow of proteins from the cytoplasm to the medium. However, in B. subtilis, multiple regulators can affect the expression of secretion machineries as well as their post-transcriptional functions for protein secretion, resulting in complicated networks.104 The secretion of heterologous proteins can be enhanced by engineering components involved in the late stages of secretion. The overproduction of the molecular chaperone PrsA lipoprotein enhanced the secretion of α-amylase from B. stearothermophilus (4-fold) in B. subtilis.105 The promoter system is also an important factor for the expression strength of B. subtilis. In order to improve the Pglv promoter system, site-directed mutagenesis of several nucleotides down-stream its transcription origin site was adopted. Thereafter, the mutated Pglv-M1 promoter was obtained, and the production of β-galactosidase reached values 1.8 times as high as that of the wild-type promoter in B. subtilis.102

High-level expression of microbial enzymes in B. megaterium

B. megaterium is a well-studied prokaryote, which is used for heterologous protein production. This expression host has several favorable features, including low protease activity, structural and segregational stability of plasmids and the ability to grow on a wide variety of substrates.10 Different heterologous proteins (e.g., GFP, sugar-modifying enzymes and hydrolases) have been successfully produced in B. megaterium.106 For example, keratinase has been expressed under the PxylA and PamyL promoters in recombinant B. megaterium,107 while the penicillin G acylase gene (pac) was highly expressed in the B. megaterium pac minus mutant.108 However, enzyme production processes in B. megaterium use regulation-differentiation mechanisms for the degradation of enzymes and the production of exo-enzyme genes is repressed during the exponential growth by transition-state regulators. In order to counteract the repression, the regulon DegSU transcriptional control promoted the hyper-secretion of a heterologous B. amyloliquefaciens amylase in B. megaterium.109

High-level expression of microbial enzymes in B. brevis

B. brevis is also an interesting host for heterologous protein production. Heterologously expressed enzymes are secreted directly into the culture medium, and they are accumulated at high levels in a relatively pure state. The secreted enzymes are usually correctly folded, soluble and biologically active. Since B. brevis has a very low level of extracellular protease activity, the secreted proteins are stable and not significantly degraded.10 For example, a hyper-thermophilic cellulase derived from Pyrococcus horikoshii110 and the recombinant phosphatidylinositol-specific phospholipase C from B. thuringiensis111 have been successfully produced with the B. brevis host-vector system. Additionally, the secretion of heterologous proteins, which is important for the high-level production can be improved by engineering methods. In fact, the secretion system of B. brevis was enhanced by the use of fungal protein disulfide isomerase (PDI). The fusion with PDI increased the extracellular production of geranylgeranyl pyrophosphate synthase in B. brevis.112

High-Level Expression of Microbial Enzymes in Lactic Acid Bacteria

For the development of biotechnological, genomic and proteomic tools, the lactic acid bacteria are becoming promising potential hosts for the high-level expression of recombinant enzymes. Apart from the cheap and easily scalable protein production associated with the microbial nature of lactic acid bacteria, since they do not have endotoxins in their membrane, these species are optimal and safer expression hosts for the production of recombinant proteins of food and medical interest. The key tools (e.g., modified strains, optimal expression vectors, suitable promoters and enhanced induction and secretion systems) for the recombinant protein production in these strains have been developed.8,113-119

L. lactis is a promising lactic acid bacterium in terms of recombinant protein production. Some recombinant proteins have been successfully expressed in L. lactis. The L. lactis MG 1363 strain was engineered as a recombinant live β-galactosidase delivery system using food-grade protein-expression techniques and selected probiotics as vehicles. The food-grade β-galactosidase was successfully expressed in that system.115 Additionally, different inducible expression systems have been constructed for the expression of recombinant proteins in L. lactis. Nisin-inducible controlled gene expression is the most widely used inducible system in L. lactis.120 This system affords tightly controlled expression and relatively high protein yield. Moreover, Bifidobacterium longum NRRL B-41409 l-arabinose isomerase (I-AI) was cloned and overexpressed in L. lactis by using a phosphate-depletion-inducible expression system.121 The L. brevis S-layer protein (SlpA) was cloned into L. lactis under the transcriptional control of the xylose-inducible expression system (XIES) and secreted into the extracellular medium.122 The enhancement of the mRNA stability achieved with the inclusion of 5′-untranslated leader sequence enhanced the production of the recombinant amylase in L. lactis by several folds.123 Furthermore, secretion is another area that can be exploited for improving the production of recombinant enzymes in L. lactis. Secretion by fusion with the Usp45 signal peptide generally obtained satisfactory efficiency levels. A nattokinase from B. subtilis was successfully secreted into the medium by using that system.124

High-Level Expression of Microbial Enzymes in Yeasts

Due to advantages such as genetic manipulation, rapid growth and ability of performing eukaryotic post-translational modifications (e.g., glycosylation), yeasts are popular industrial hosts for the expression of recombinant enzymes. The yeast expression hosts used for recombinant enzymes expression mainly include P. pastoris, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Hansenula polymorpha, Kluyveromyces lactis, Schizosaccharomyces pombe, Yarrowia lipolytica, Arxula adeninivorans and Candida boidinii.84,125-131 These yeasts use carbon sources, rapidly reach high cell densities and are thermo-tolerant and halo-tolerant.132 In order to improve the production of recombinant enzymes, several yeast hosts were engineered to include further advantages (e.g., lack of proteases, optimized transformation system and efficient expression) (Table 1).

Table 1. The advantages of different yeast hosts of recombinant proteins.

Hosts Advantages References
Pichia pastoris
Signal peptide cleavage; protein folding; posttranslational modifications inside the cell; the ability of secretion into medium with normal function
84
Saccharomyces cerevisiae
In addition to the advantages of yeast systems; safe (GRAS) strain
125
Hansenula polymorpha
Strong, tunable promoters derived from genes of the methanol utilization pathway; MOX (methanol oxidase) promoter significantly de-repressed under glucose limitation or starvation; allowing for a methanol-free process; high cell densities; efficiently secrete proteins
125, 126
Lactobacillus lactis
A strong, inducible promoter LAC4; the ability to utilize cheap substrates; ability to secrete high molecular weight protein
125, 127
Schizosaccharomyces pombe
Higher eukaryotes; morphologically well-defined glycoproteins; the quality control mechanism of glycoprotein folding closer to mammalian cells
125, 128
Yarrowia lipolytica
The ability to secrete high molecular weight proteins; the high secretion of large molecular enzymes by the co-translational translocation pathway; does not ferment sugars; high cell density fermentation; safe (GRAS) strain
125, 129
Arxula adeninivorans
A temperature-dependent dimorphic yeast; secrete higher concentrations of proteins; can grow on a range of compounds as the sole source of carbon and energy
125, 130
Candida boidinii An efficient host for secretory production of enzyme 131

High-level expression of microbial enzymes in P. pastoris

The methylotrophic yeast P. pastoris is considered an excellent host for the production of enzymes from different sources. All P. pastoris expression strains, including the commonly used auxotrophic mutants GS115 and protease-deficient strains (e.g., SMD 1163, SMD 1165), are derived from the wild-type strain NRRL-Y 11430. P. pastoris has three phenotypes (i.e., Mut+, Muts and Mut-) related to methanol utilization. There are many advantages of this expression system and the most important one is its perfect protein processing mechanism, including signal peptide cleavage, protein folding, post-translational modifications inside the cell and the ability of secreting its products into the medium with normal function.133,134 Many recombinant enzymes have been successfully expressed in P. pastoris. For example, an alkaline α-amylase gene from alkaliphilic Alkalimonas amylolytica was successfully expressed in P. pastoris GS115.84 A poly (viny alcohol) dehydrogenase (PVADH) from Sphingopyxis spp 113P3 was also highly expressed in P. pastoris GS115 by using a 3-L bioreactor and reached an activity of 902 U/mL.133

The optimal system for the production of recombinant enzymes in P. pastoris includes several crucial parts: a suitable vector, the codon-optimized gene, the signal sequence, the ability of proteolytic cleavage and fermentation optimization. Among them, gateway-compatible vectors (pBGP1-DEST and pPICZ α-DEST) have been developed to enable a rapid and convenient preparation of expression plasmids for the production of secretory proteins in P. pastoris.135 Additionally, the choice of the inducer and the induction mechanism for heterologous gene expression highly affects product yields of enzymes. In P. pastoris fermentations, since methanol is an inappropriate inducer for the production of products used in the food industry, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAP) promoter has been widely preferred as an alternative to the AOX1 promoter.136 In order to improve the expression levels of the GAP promoter, the combination of AOX1 and GAP promoters to co-express recombinant proteins has been developed, and the secreted protein concentration was approximately 2-fold higher compared with the concentration obtained using the GAP promoter alone, with appreciable differences in the cell concentration.137

For high-level expression of recombinant enzymes in high-cell-density fermentation of P. pastoris, the medium includes a basal salt medium, trace salt solution (PTM1) and ammonium hydroxide. In particular, ammonium hydroxide was used to maintain the pH, while different combinations of glycerol/methanol were supplied as carbon source. Although the use of glycerol as co-substrate is one of the most common strategies, when glycerol is used for the recombinant enzyme production, the excess glycerol in the medium represses the AOX1 promoter.138 As an alternative to the glycerol/methanol co-feeding strategy, different feeding strategies were adopted, such as sorbitol as a co-substrate.84,139,140 Due to the oxygen used in the oxidation of methanol to formaldehyde as a side-reaction, high oxygen transfer rates are required in the methanol-utilization pathway.125 High agitation and oxygen-enriched air can be used to minimize the transfer resistance, and thus, the dissolved oxygen is kept around 20–30%.125,133,139,140 The post-secretory degradation of the recombinant enzymes by host-specific proteases is also a problem that affects the production yield, especially in high-density fermentation processes. As a solution, several approaches have been attempted, including the control of the cultivation conditions (e.g., pH), addition of protease inhibitors (e.g., casamino acids) and different medium compositions.84,125,141 Although the optimum temperature for the growth is 30°C, the recombinant protein production was improved by decreasing the induction temperature. When the induction temperature was decreased from 30°C to 20°C, the highest yield of recombinant alkaline α-amylase reached 130 U/mL.84

High-level expression of microbial enzymes in S. cerevisiae

In addition to the advantages of yeast systems, S. cerevisiae is recognized as generally regarded as safe (GRAS) strain.142 Therefore, the recombinant enzymes produced in this host are mainly used in the food and drug industries. The most important recombinant enzyme product on the market that is made in S. cerevisiae is urate oxidase.143 However, there are other recombinant enzymes that have been successfully expressed in S. cerevisiae (e.g., an esterase from Thermus thermophilus HB27).144 Additionally, a novel peroxiredoxin (Prx) isolate from Acinetobacter spp SM04 has been expressed in the extracellular supernatant with a titer of 0.24 mg/mL.141 However, several factors can affect the expression yield of recombinant enzymes in S. cerevisiae. In this context, there are several strategies aiming to enhance the expression yield of proteins. An endoglucanase from Paenibacillus barcinonensis has been expressed in S. cerevisiae by using different domains of the cell wall protein Pir4 as translational fusion partners.145 The manipulation of the unfolded protein response (UPR) pathway regulator Hac1p can stimulate the secretory pathway of S. cerevisiae to improve the secretion of recombinant enzymes. Overexpression of S. cerevisiae HAC1 yielded a 2.0-fold enhancement in the secretion of the endogenous invertase.146 After screening of a S. cerevisiae mutant library, the deletion of the gene MON2 enhanced the secretion of the recombinant luciferase, which encoded a scaffold protein for vesicle formation located in the late Golgi.147 The supplementation of the growth medium with amino acids significantly improved the culture growth and cellulose production in S. cerevisiae.148

High-level expression of microbial enzymes in other yeast hosts

The enzymes produced in H. polymorpha are xylose isomerase, glucose oxidase, glycolate oxidase, catalase, phytase and isopenicillin-N synthase.125,126,149,150 A mixture of glycerol and methanol was added to enhance the enzyme production during the last hours of the fermentation in H. polymorpha. Kottmeier et al. found that secondary substrate-limited batch fermentation could divert the metabolic flux toward protein production and found the yield of GFP to increase 1.9-fold.151

Y. lipolytica is also an increasingly popular host for high-level expression of heterologous recombinant enzymes with the advantage of secretion of high-molecular-weight enzymes through the co-translational translocation pathway and high-cell density fermentation. A chitosanase from the marine bacterium Pseudomonas spp OUC1 was overexpressed in Y. lipolytica when the expression vector carrying two copies of the chitosanase gene was transformed.129 A thermostable α-amylase from Thermobifida fusca NTU22 was cloned into Y. lipolytica P01 g host strain using the vector pYLSC1, and high levels of extracellular amylase production (730 U/L) were obtained.152

K. lactis has been successfully used for the production of recombinant enzymes such as lipase, chitosanase, esterase, galactosidase and glucoamylase.129,153-155 A glucose repression-defective mutant of K. lactis was used to improve the production yield of glucoamylase.156

The dimorphic species A. adeninivorans uses adenine, xanthine, uric acid, putrescine, glucose and n-alkylamines. Among the few recombinant enzymes that have been expressed in A. adeninivorans, a tannase has been successfully over-produced using various plasmids carrying one or two expression modules.157

S. pombe is an attractive host for the expression of recombinant enzymes. An endopolygalacturonase from S. cerevisiae PGU1 was successfully expressed in S. pombe.158 The deletion of its proteases improved the secretion of recombinant enzymes in the S. pombe. In fact, a multi-protease-deficient S. pombe stain A8 obtained by deleting protease genes resulted in a 30-fold increase in the secretion of hGH, a proteolytically sensitive model protein.159

The methylotrophic yeast C. biodinii was investigated as an efficient host for the secretory production of enzymes. The acetylspermidine oxidase (ASOD)-coding sequence was placed under the control of the AOD1 promoter and overexpressed in the C. boidinii strain ado1Δ.131

High-Level Expression of Microbial Enzymes in Filamentous Fungi

Due to the superior capacities of hyper-producing and secreting proteins, filamentous fungi are extraordinary hosts for the overexpression of recombinant enzymes. The industrial strains include Aspergillus, Trichoderma, Penicillium and Rhizopus species. In particular, Aspergillus and Trichoderma species can produce and secrete very high levels of recombinant enzymes.

High-level expression of microbial enzymes in A. species

Aspergillus species are particularly important industrial filamentous fungi employed in the large-scale production of both homologous and heterologous enzymes. A. oryzae and A. niger are on the GRAS list of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in the United States. Although A. fumigatus and A. nidulans are the natural filamentous fungal production hosts, they produce toxins and are therefore not relevant as hosts for the production of recombinant enzymes.160,161

A. niger represents a promising host for the expression of recombinant enzymes. Some homologous and heterologous enzymes were overexpressed in A. niger by using a standardized expression cassette. For example, a manganese peroxidase gene (mnp1) from Phanerochaete chrysosporium was transformed by exploiting the resistance to hygromycin B, and successfully expressed in A. niger.162 A Hypocrea jecorina endoglucanase Cel7B was expressed in a recombinant A. niger, which was grown on spent hydrolysates (stillage) from sugarcane bagasse and spruce wood.163 The features that influence protein production and secretion could be employed to improve enzyme production levels in industrial bioprocesses via protein engineering. Protein sequence features were explored in relation to the production of overexpressed extracellular proteins by A. oryzae. It was found that tyrosine and asparagine composition positively influence the high-level production of recombinant enzymes.164 Specific induction or repression of the catR (catalase) promoter may be used to enhance the heterologous protein production in A. niger. For example, the induction of the catR promoter with 0.2% H2O2 and 1.5% CaCO3 in the culture medium increased the expression of the alkaline xylanase by 2.61- and 2.20-fold in A. niger, respectively.165

A. oryzae is an especially interesting host for the production of recombinant proteins because of its demonstrated capacities to hyper-produce and secrete enzyme proteins. For example, a glucose-stimulated β-glucosidase from the termite Neotermes koshunensis was successfully expressed in A. oryzae.166 Two termite endogenous β-1,4-endoglucanases (RsEG and NtEG) from the salivary gland of Reticulitermes speratus and the midgut of Nasutitermes takasagoensis were respectively expressed in A. oryzae as the host.167 Proteolytic degradation by secreted protease into the culture medium is a significant problem that remains to be solved in the heterologous protein production by filamentous fungi. In order to enhance the production of bovine chymosim in A. oryzae, two (tppA and pepE) and five (tppA, pepE, nptB, dpplV and dppV) protease genes were disrupted.168 Since the post-transcription processing limits enzyme yield, the vacuolar protein-sorting gene VPS10 was mutated to investigate the extracellular production levels of heterologous proteins in A. oryzae.169

High-level expression of microbial enzymes in Trichoderma species

The Trichoderma spp includes T. reesei, T. atroviride and T. virus. T. reesei has an extraordinary ability to secrete proteins and represents a principal target cellulose host in the quest to replace gasoline with cellulose-derived ethanol. However, a more efficient heterologous expression system for enzymes from different organisms is needed to further improve cellulose mixture in T. reesei. For example, the strong cbh1 (cellobiohydrolase I) promoter of T. reesei was used in the heterologous expression of cellulase.170 Lv et al. constructed two T. reesei expression vectors, pWEF31 and pWEF3, which are useful for the large-scale expression of the gene encoding the enzyme.171 Three endoxylanase genes (Ct xyn11A, Ct xyn11B and Ct xyn11C) from the thermophilic fungus Chaetomium thermophilum CBS 730.95 were expressed in T. reesei under the control of the strong T. reesei cel7A (chh1) promoter.172 The lipase gene (Lip) of the A. niger was de novo synthesized and expressed in the T. reesei under the promoter of the cbh1.173 Moreover, RNAi-mediated gene silencing could effectively suppress cbh1 gene expression, and the reduction of CBHI resulted in a clear improvement in the production of heterologous enzymes.

High-level expression of microbial enzymes in other filamentous fungi species

The white rot fungi Penicillium and Rhizopus spp have the potential for the production of recombinant enzymes. For example, two novel lignin peroxidase genes isolated by RT-PCR and RACE-PCR were transformed into the white rot fungus P. sordida YK-624 uracil auxotrophic mutant UV-64, and successfully expressed and secreted in an active form.174 A strain with high production of pectin lyase (PL) was transformed with the plasmid pAN52pgg2, containing the gene encoding polygalacturonase (PG) of P. griseoroseum, under the control of the gpd promoter from A. nidulans. The activities of PL and PG in the recombinant strain P. griseoroseum were 266- and 27-fold greater, respectively, than those in the wild-type strain.175 Additionally, carbon sources can affect the secretion of enzymes in Penicillium species. Navarrete et al. found that the acetylated xylan and sugar beet pulp exerted strong regulatory control over the enzymes secreted in Penicillium purpurogenum.176 Meanwhile, Rhizopus oryzae has been used for the production of enzymes such as glucoamylase and lipase. Mertens et al. have created three plasmid vectors using the glucoamylase A (amyA), pyruvate decarboxylase (pdcA) or phosphoglycerate kinase (pgk1) promoter to drive the expression of heterologous proteins.177

Conclusions

Recombinant microbial enzymes can be expressed in cell cultures of bacteria (e.g., E. coli, Bacilli or lactic acid bacteria), yeasts or filamentous fungi. Large proteins (> 100 kD) are usually expressed in eukaryotic systems, while smaller ones (< 30 kD) are expressed in prokaryotic systems. The E. coli expression system continues to dominate the bacterial expression systems. Yeasts can be grown rapidly to high densities, and the level of product expression can be regulated by simple manipulation of the medium. Bacillus systems are high secretors and host strains and are mainly preferred for the homologous expression of recombinant enzymes (e.g., proteases and amylases). Since filamentous fungi can secrete high levels of bioactive enzymes with post-translational processing, they became attractive hosts for the recombinant DNA technology. Although the lactic acid bacteria are safe and highly effective expression systems that can revolutionize the field of recombinant protein production in food and drug, the application of lactic acid bacteria as host factories for the overexpression of recombinant enzymes needs to be further explored.

Due to the wide variety of applications of recombinant enzymes, their need will significantly increase in the future. The challenges to meet the growing demand are multifaceted in terms of quantity, quality and cost-effectiveness. The production of large amounts of recombinant proteins is of interest and needs to employ high-throughput expression technologies. A comprehensive coverage of the proteins in a proteome is demanded for systems-level understanding. With a large variety of vectors, promoters and selection markers to choose from, combined with the accumulated knowledge on industrial-scale fermentation techniques and current advances in post-genomic technology, it is possible to design improved cost-effective expression systems in order to meet the increasing demand for enzymes.

Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest

No potential conflict of interest was disclosed.

Footnotes

References

  • 1.Sanchez S, Demain A. Special issue on the production of recombinant proteins. Biotechnol Adv. 2012;30:1100–1. doi: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2011.12.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Maurer KH. Detergent proteases. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2004;15:330–4. doi: 10.1016/j.copbio.2004.06.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Makrides SC. Strategies for achieving high-level expression of genes in Escherichia coli. Microbiol Rev. 1996;60:512–38. doi: 10.1128/mr.60.3.512-538.1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Datar RV, Cartwright T, Rosen CG. Process economics of animal cell and bacterial fermentations: a case study analysis of tissue plasminogen activator. Biotechnology (N Y) 1993;11:349–57. doi: 10.1038/nbt0393-349. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Punt PJ, van Biezen N, Conesa A, Albers A, Mangnus J, van den Hondel C. Filamentous fungi as cell factories for heterologous protein production. Trends Biotechnol. 2002;20:200–6. doi: 10.1016/S0167-7799(02)01933-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Baneyx F. Recombinant protein expression in Escherichia coli. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 1999;10:411–21. doi: 10.1016/S0958-1669(99)00003-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Ward OP. Production of recombinant proteins by filamentous fungi. Biotechnol Adv. 2012;30:1119–39. doi: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2011.09.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.García-Fruitós E. Lactic Acid Bacteria: a promising alternative for recombinant protein production. Microb Cell Fact. 2012;11:157. doi: 10.1186/1475-2859-11-157. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Yang HQ, Liu L, Li JH, Du GC, Chen J. Heterologous expression, biochemical characterization, and overproduction of alkaline α-amylase from Bacillus alcalophilus in Bacillus subtilis. Microb Cell Fact. 2011;10:77. doi: 10.1186/1475-2859-10-77. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Terpe K. Overview of bacterial expression systems for heterologous protein production: from molecular and biochemical fundamentals to commercial systems. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2006;72:211–22. doi: 10.1007/s00253-006-0465-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Chou CP. Engineering cell physiology to enhance recombinant protein production in Escherichia coli. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2007;76:521–32. doi: 10.1007/s00253-007-1039-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Mitchell JE, Zheng D, Busby SJW, Minchin SD. Identification and analysis of ‘extended -10’ promoters in Escherichia coli. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003;31:4689–95. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkg694. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Lesnik EA, Sampath R, Levene HB, Henderson TJ, McNeil JA, Ecker DJ. Prediction of rho-independent transcriptional terminators in Escherichia coli. Nucleic Acids Res. 2001;29:3583–94. doi: 10.1093/nar/29.17.3583. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Trepod CM, Mott JE. A spontaneous runaway vector for production-scale expression of bovine somatotropin from Escherichia coi. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2002;58:84–8. doi: 10.1007/s00253-001-0859-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Chao YP, Chern JT, Wen CS. Coupling the T7 A1 promoter to the runaway-replication vector as an efficient method for stringent control and high-level expression of lacZ. Biotechnol Prog. 2001;17:203–7. doi: 10.1021/bp0001462. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Guzman LM, Belin D, Carson MJ, Beckwith J. Tight regulation, modulation, and high-level expression by vectors containing the arabinose PBAD promoter. J Bacteriol. 1995;177:4121–30. doi: 10.1128/jb.177.14.4121-4130.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Chao YP, Wen CS, Wang JY. A facile and efficient method to achieve LacZ overproduction by the expression vector carrying the thermoregulated promoter and plasmid copy number. Biotechnol Prog. 2004;20:420–5. doi: 10.1021/bp034202l. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Yang HQ, Liu L, Wang MX, Li JH, Wang NS, Du GC, et al. Structure-based engineering of methionine residues in the catalytic cores of alkaline amylase from Alkalimonas amylolytica for improved oxidative stability. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2012;78:7519–26. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01307-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Wang ZQ, Wang YS, Shi H, Su ZG. Expression and production of recombinant cis-epoxysuccinate hydrolase in Escherichia coli under the control of temperature-dependent promoter. J Biotechnol. 2012;162:232–6. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2012.09.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Giladi H, Goldenberg D, Koby S, Oppenheim AB. Enhanced activity of the bacteriophage lambda PL promoter at low temperature. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995;92:2184–8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.92.6.2184. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Newbury SF, Smith NH, Robinson EC, Hiles ID, Higgins CF. Stabilization of translationally active mRNA by prokaryotic REP sequences. Cell. 1987;48:297–310. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(87)90433-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Brosius J. Compilation of superlinker vectors. Methods Enzymol. 1992;216:469–83. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(92)16043-J. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Choi YJ, Morel L, Le François T, Bourque D, Bourget L, Groleau D, et al. Novel, versatile, and tightly regulated expression system for Escherichia coli strains. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2010;76:5058–66. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00413-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Suter-Crazzolara C, Unsicker K. Improved expression of toxic proteins in E. coli. Biotechniques. 1995;19:202–4. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Saïda F. Overview on the expression of toxic gene products in Escherichia coli. Curr Protoc Protein Sci. 2007;Chapter 5:19. doi: 10.1002/0471140864.ps0519s50. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Chao YP, Chern JT, Wen CS, Fu H. Construction and characterization of thermo-inducible vectors derived from heat-sensitive lacI genes in combination with the T7 A1 promoter. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2002;79:1–8. doi: 10.1002/bit.10304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Andrews B, Adari H, Hannig G, Lahue E, Gosselin M, Martin S, et al. A tightly regulated high level expression vector that utilizes a thermosensitive lac repressor: production of the human T cell receptor V β 5.3 in Escherichia coli. Gene. 1996;182:101–9. doi: 10.1016/S0378-1119(96)00523-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.O’Connell HA, Niu C, Gilbert ES. Enhanced high copy number plasmid maintenance and heterologous protein production in an Escherichia coli biofilm. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2007;97:439–46. doi: 10.1002/bit.21240. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Mertens N, Remaut E, Fiers W. Tight transcriptional control mechanism ensures stable high-level expression from T7 promoter-based expression plasmids. Biotechnology (N Y) 1995;13:175–9. doi: 10.1038/nbt0295-175. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Bowers LM, Lapoint K, Anthony L, Pluciennik A, Filutowicz M. Bacterial expression system with tightly regulated gene expression and plasmid copy number. Gene. 2004;340:11–8. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2004.06.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Sagawa H, Ohshima A, Kato I. A tightly regulated expression system in Escherichia coli with SP6 RNA polymerase. Gene. 1996;168:37–41. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(95)00644-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Balakrishnan R, Bolten B, Backman KC. A gene cassette for adapting Escherichia coli strains as hosts for att-Int-mediated rearrangement and pL expression vectors. Gene. 1994;138:101–4. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(94)90788-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Ringquist S, Shinedling S, Barrick D, Green L, Binkley J, Stormo GD, et al. Translation initiation in Escherichia coli: sequences within the ribosome-binding site. Mol Microbiol. 1992;6:1219–29. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1992.tb01561.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Vellanoweth RL, Rabinowitz JC. The influence of ribosome-binding-site elements on translational efficiency in Bacillus subtilis and Escherichia coli in vivo. Mol Microbiol. 1992;6:1105–14. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1992.tb01548.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Błaszczyk L, Ciesiołka J. Secondary structure and the role in translation initiation of the 5′-terminal region of p53 mRNA. Biochemistry. 2011;50:7080–92. doi: 10.1021/bi200659b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Wang SS, Zhang RZ, Geng YW, Shen W, Tan NJ, Wang L, et al. [Improved expression and catalytic efficiency of (R)-carbonyl reductase in Escherichia coli by secondary structure optimization of mRNA translation initiation region] Sheng Wu Gong Cheng Xue Bao. 2009;25:1907–13. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Esipov RS, Gurevich AI, Kaiushin AL, Korosteleva MD, Belova MA. [The dependence of the E.coli gene expression level on the structure of the translation initiation region (TIR). IV. Distal complementary TIR interactions with the mRNA coding region] Bioorg Khim. 1999;25:548–53. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Tanaka T, Kurihara Y, Sakamoto T, Furusawa M, Kobayashi A, Katahira M, et al. Structure of translation initiation region of c-myc mRNA and thermostability of the c-myc mRNA/antisense ODN complex. Nucleic Acids Symp Ser. 1995;34:135–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Nikolenko GN, Kravchenko VV. [Effect of the length of the loop segment of local mRNA secondary structure in the region of lacZ gene translation initiation on its expression] Mol Gen Mikrobiol Virusol. 1996;1:28–32. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Olins PO, Rangwala SH. A novel sequence element derived from bacteriophage T7 mRNA acts as an enhancer of translation of the lacZ gene in Escherichia coli. J Biol Chem. 1989;264:16973–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Aznarez I, Barash Y, Shai O, He D, Zielenski J, Tsui L-C, et al. A systematic analysis of intronic sequences downstream of 5′ splice sites reveals a widespread role for U-rich motifs and TIA1/TIAL1 proteins in alternative splicing regulation. Genome Res. 2008;18:1247–58. doi: 10.1101/gr.073155.107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Sprengart ML, Fuchs E, Porter AG. The downstream box: an efficient and independent translation initiation signal in Escherichia coli. EMBO J. 1996;15:665–74. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Lin H-H, Lin C-H, Hwang S-M, Tseng C-P. High growth rate downregulates fumA mRNA transcription but is dramatically compensated by its mRNA stability in Escherichia coli. Curr Microbiol. 2012;64:412–7. doi: 10.1007/s00284-012-0087-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Ahn J-H, Kang T-J, Kim D-M. Tuning the expression level of recombinant proteins by modulating mRNA stability in a cell-free protein synthesis system. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2008;101:422–7. doi: 10.1002/bit.21884. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Crawford DJ, Ito K, Nakamura Y, Tate WP. Indirect regulation of translational termination efficiency at highly expressed genes and recoding sites by the factor recycling function of Escherichia coli release factor RF3. EMBO J. 1999;18:727–32. doi: 10.1093/emboj/18.3.727. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Vera A, González-Montalbán N, Arís A, Villaverde A. The conformational quality of insoluble recombinant proteins is enhanced at low growth temperatures. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2007;96:1101–6. doi: 10.1002/bit.21218. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Chen Y, Song JM, Sui SF, Wang DN. DnaK and DnaJ facilitated the folding process and reduced inclusion body formation of magnesium transporter CorA overexpressed in Escherichia coli. Protein Expr Purif. 2003;32:221–31. doi: 10.1016/S1046-5928(03)00233-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Jha PK, Du Y, Wu QL, Leavis PC, Sarkar S. Overexpression and rapid purification of rabbit fast skeletal troponin I from Escherichia coli: effect of different promoters, host strains, and culture conditions. Protein Expr Purif. 1994;5:604–13. doi: 10.1006/prep.1994.1083. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Singh SM, Upadhyay AK, Panda AK. Solubilization at high pH results in improved recovery of proteins from inclusion bodies of E. coli. J Chem Technol Biotechnol. 2008;83:1126–34. doi: 10.1002/jctb.1945. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Crisman RL, Randolph TW. Refolding of proteins from inclusion bodies is favored by a diminished hydrophobic effect at elevated pressures. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2009;102:483–92. doi: 10.1002/bit.22082. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Jhamb K, Jawed A, Sahoo DK. Immobilized chaperones: A productive alternative to refolding of bacterial inclusion body proteins. Process Biochem. 2008;43:587–97. doi: 10.1016/j.procbio.2008.02.004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Carrió MM, Villaverde A. Role of molecular chaperones in inclusion body formation. FEBS Lett. 2003;537:215–21. doi: 10.1016/S0014-5793(03)00126-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Naseem R, Davies SR, Jones H, Wann KT, Holland IB, Campbell AK. Cytosolic Ca2+ regulates protein expression in E. coli through release from inclusion bodies. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2007;360:33–9. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2007.05.223. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Kischnick S, Weber B, Verdino P, Keller W, Sanders EA, Anspach FB, et al. Bacterial fermentation of recombinant major wasp allergen Antigen 5 using oxygen limiting growth conditions improves yield and quality of inclusion bodies. Protein Expr Purif. 2006;47:621–8. doi: 10.1016/j.pep.2006.01.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Ito H, Kamei K, Iwamoto I, Inaguma Y, Tsuzuki M, Kishikawa M, et al. Hsp27 suppresses the formation of inclusion bodies induced by expression of R120G alpha B-crystallin, a cause of desmin-related myopathy. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2003;60:1217–23. doi: 10.1007/s00018-003-3024-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Lin WJ, Huang SW, Chou CP. DegP-coexpression minimizes inclusion-body formation upon overproduction of recombinant penicillin acylase in Escherichia coli. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2001;73:484–92. doi: 10.1002/bit.1083. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Zhang YB, Greenberg B, Lacks SA. Analysis of a Streptococcus pneumoniae gene encoding signal peptidase I and overproduction of the enzyme. Gene. 1997;194:249–55. doi: 10.1016/S0378-1119(97)00198-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Pérez-Pérez J, Márquez G, Barbero JL, Gutiérrez J. Increasing the efficiency of protein export in Escherichia coli. Biotechnology (N Y) 1994;12:178–80. doi: 10.1038/nbt0294-178. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Uthandi S, Prunetti L, De Vera IMS, Fanucci GE, Angerhofer A, Maupin-Furlow JA. Enhanced archaeal laccase production in recombinant Escherichia coli by modification of N-terminal propeptide and twin arginine translocation motifs. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol. 2012;39:1523–32. doi: 10.1007/s10295-012-1152-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Brinkworth AJ, Malcolm DS, Pedrosa AT, Roguska K, Shahbazian S, Graham JE, et al. Chlamydia trachomatis Slc1 is a type III secretion chaperone that enhances the translocation of its invasion effector substrate TARP. Mol Microbiol. 2011;82:131–44. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2011.07802.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Matsumoto G, Homma T, Mori H, Ito K. A mutation in secY that causes enhanced SecA insertion and impaired late functions in protein translocation. J Bacteriol. 2000;182:3377–82. doi: 10.1128/JB.182.12.3377-3382.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Zhan J, Stayton P, Press OW. Modification of ricin A chain, by addition of endoplasmic reticulum (KDEL) or Golgi (YQRL) retention sequences, enhances its cytotoxicity and translocation. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 1998;46:55–60. doi: 10.1007/s002620050460. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Tesfai BT, Wu D, Chen S, Chen J, Wu J. Strategies for enhancing extracellular secretion of recombinant cyclodextrin glucanotransferase in E. coli. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2012;167:897–908. doi: 10.1007/s12010-012-9747-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Low KO, Jonet MA, Ismail NF, Illias RM. Optimization of a Bacillus sp signal peptide for improved recombinant protein secretion and cell viability in Escherichia coli: Is there an optimal signal peptide design? Bioengineered. 2012;3:334–8. doi: 10.4161/bioe.21454. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Jonet MA, Mahadi NM, Murad AMA, Rabu A, Bakar FD, Rahim RA, et al. Optimization of a heterologous signal peptide by site-directed mutagenesis for improved secretion of recombinant proteins in Escherichia coli. J Mol Microbiol Biotechnol. 2012;22:48–58. doi: 10.1159/000336524. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Ismail NF, Hamdan S, Mahadi NM, Murad AMA, Rabu A, Bakar FD, et al. A mutant L-asparaginase II signal peptide improves the secretion of recombinant cyclodextrin glucanotransferase and the viability of Escherichia coli. Biotechnol Lett. 2011;33:999–1005. doi: 10.1007/s10529-011-0517-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Kikuchi Y, Itaya H, Date M, Matsui K, Wu L-F. TatABC overexpression improves Corynebacterium glutamicum Tat-dependent protein secretion. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2009;75:603–7. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01874-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Liu S-L, Du K, Chen W-Z, Liu G, Xing M. Effective approach to greatly enhancing selective secretion and expression of three cytoplasmic enzymes in Escherichia coli through synergistic effect of EDTA and lysozyme. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol. 2012;39:1301–7. doi: 10.1007/s10295-012-1136-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Nakasone N, Toma C, Higa N, Koizumi Y, Ogura Y, Suzuki T. Detergents enhance EspB secretion from Escherichia coli strains harboring the locus for the enterocyte effacement (LEE) gene. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2011;315:109–14. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2010.02176.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Schlapschy M, Skerra A. Periplasmic chaperones used to enhance functional secretion of proteins in E. coli. Methods Mol Biol. 2011;705:211–24. doi: 10.1007/978-1-61737-967-3_12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Dälken B, Jabulowsky RA, Oberoi P, Benhar I, Wels WS. Maltose-binding protein enhances secretion of recombinant human granzyme B accompanied by in vivo processing of a precursor MBP fusion protein. PLoS One. 2010;5:e14404. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0014404. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Ding R, Li Z, Chen S, Wu D, Wu J, Chen J. Enhanced secretion of recombinant alpha-cyclodextrin glucosyltransferase from E. coli by medium additives. Process Biochem. 2010;45:880–6. doi: 10.1016/j.procbio.2010.02.009. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Li ZF, Gu ZB, Wang M, Du GC, Wu J, Chen J. Delayed supplementation of glycine enhances extracellular secretion of the recombinant alpha-cyclodextrin glycosyltransferase in Escherichia coli. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2010;85:553–61. doi: 10.1007/s00253-009-2157-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Gupta P, Lee PS, Lee KH. BIOT 107-Enhancing extracellular protein secretion in Escherichia coli by translation engineering. Abstracts Papers Am Chem Soci. 2007;234:107. [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Suciu D, Inouye M. The 19-residue pro-peptide of staphylococcal nuclease has a profound secretion-enhancing ability in Escherichia coli. Mol Microbiol. 1996;21:181–95. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.1996.6211341.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Alfasi S, Sevastsyanovich Y, Zaffaroni L, Griffiths L, Hall R, Cole J. Use of GFP fusions for the isolation of Escherichia coli strains for improved production of different target recombinant proteins. J Biotechnol. 2011;156:11–21. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2011.08.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Lian JZ, Ding SH, Cai J, Zhang DP, Xu ZN, Wang XN. Improving aquaporin Z expression in Escherichia coli by fusion partners and subsequent condition optimization. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2009;82:463–70. doi: 10.1007/s00253-008-1774-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Lee C-D, Sun H-C, Hu S-M, Chiu C-F, Homhuan A, Liang S-M, et al. An improved SUMO fusion protein system for effective production of native proteins. Protein Sci. 2008;17:1241–8. doi: 10.1110/ps.035188.108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Tsunoda Y, Sakai N, Kikuchi K, Katoh S, Akagi K, Miura-Ohnuma J, et al. Improving expression and solubility of rice proteins produced as fusion proteins in Escherichia coli. Protein Expr Purif. 2005;42:268–77. doi: 10.1016/j.pep.2005.04.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Makoff A, Parry N, Dicken L. Translational fusions with fragments of the trpE gene improve the expression of a poorly expressed heterologous gene in Escherichia coli. J Gen Microbiol. 1989;135:11–24. doi: 10.1099/00221287-135-1-11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Hartl FU. Molecular chaperones in cellular protein folding. Nature. 1996;381:571–9. doi: 10.1038/381571a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Bartual SG, Garcia-Doval C, Alonso J, Schoehn G, van Raaij MJ. Two-chaperone assisted soluble expression and purification of the bacteriophage T4 long tail fibre protein gp37. Protein Expr Purif. 2010;70:116–21. doi: 10.1016/j.pep.2009.11.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Stephens LL, Shonhai A, Blatch GL. Co-expression of the Plasmodium falciparum molecular chaperone, PfHsp70, improves the heterologous production of the antimalarial drug target GTP cyclohydrolase I, PfGCHI. Protein Expr Purif. 2011;77:159–65. doi: 10.1016/j.pep.2011.01.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Yang HQ, Liu L, Shin HD, Chen RR, Li JH, Du GC, et al. Comparative analysis of heterologous expression, biochemical characterization optimal production of an alkaline α-amylase from alkaliphilic Alkalimonas amylolytica in Escherichia coli and Pichia pastoris. Biotechnol Prog. 2013;29:39–47. doi: 10.1002/btpr.1657. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Burgess-Brown NA, Sharma S, Sobott F, Loenarz C, Oppermann U, Gileadi O. Codon optimization can improve expression of human genes in Escherichia coli: A multi-gene study. Protein Expr Purif. 2008;59:94–102. doi: 10.1016/j.pep.2008.01.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Calderone TL, Stevens RD, Oas TG. High-level misincorporation of lysine for arginine at AGA codons in a fusion protein expressed in Escherichia coli. J Mol Biol. 1996;262:407–12. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1996.0524. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Hutterer KM, Zhang Z, Michaels ML, Belouski E, Hong RW, Shah B, et al. Targeted codon optimization improves translational fidelity for an Fc fusion protein. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2012;109:2770–7. doi: 10.1002/bit.24555. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Stenström CM, Jin H, Major LL, Tate WP, Isaksson LA. Codon bias at the 3′-side of the initiation codon is correlated with translation initiation efficiency in Escherichia coli. Gene. 2001;263:273–84. doi: 10.1016/S0378-1119(00)00550-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Gustafsson C, Govindarajan S, Minshull J. Codon bias and heterologous protein expression. Trends Biotechnol. 2004;22:346–53. doi: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2004.04.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Kim S, Lee SB. Rare codon clusters at 5′-end influence heterologous expression of archaeal gene in Escherichia coli. Protein Expr Purif. 2006;50:49–57. doi: 10.1016/j.pep.2006.07.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Baca AM, Hol WGJ. Overcoming codon bias: a method for high-level overexpression of Plasmodium and other AT-rich parasite genes in Escherichia coli. Int J Parasitol. 2000;30:113–8. doi: 10.1016/S0020-7519(00)00019-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Kleber-Janke T, Becker WM. Use of modified BL21(DE3) Escherichia coli cells for high-level expression of recombinant peanut allergens affected by poor codon usage. Protein Expr Purif. 2000;19:419–24. doi: 10.1006/prep.2000.1265. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Patnaik R, Zolandz RR, Green DA, Kraynie DF. L-tyrosine production by recombinant Escherichia coli: fermentation optimization and recovery. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2008;99:741–52. doi: 10.1002/bit.21765. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Kleist S, Miksch G, Hitzmann B, Arndt M, Friehs K, Flaschel E. Optimization of the extracellular production of a bacterial phytase with Escherichia coli by using different fed-batch fermentation strategies. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2003;61:456–62. doi: 10.1007/s00253-003-1229-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Kumar R, Shimizu K. Transcriptional regulation of main metabolic pathways of cyoA, cydB, fnr, and fur gene knockout Escherichia coli in C-limited and N-limited aerobic continuous cultures. Microb Cell Fact. 2011;10:3. doi: 10.1186/1475-2859-10-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Rodriguez-Carmona E, Cano-Garrido O, Dragosits M, Maurer M, Mader A, Kunert R, et al. Recombinant Fab expression and secretion in Escherichia coli continuous culture at medium cell densities: Influence of temperature. Process Biochem. 2012;47:446–52. doi: 10.1016/j.procbio.2011.11.024. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Hewitt CJ, Nebe-von Caron G, Nienow AW, McFarlane CM. The use of multi-parameter flow cytometry to compare the physiological response of Escherichia coli W3110 to glucose limitation during batch, fed-batch and continuous culture cultivations. J Biotechnol. 1999;75:251–64. doi: 10.1016/S0168-1656(99)00168-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Fang SY, Li JH, Liu L, Du GC, Chen J. Overproduction of alkaline polygalacturonate lyase in recombinant Escherichia coli by a two-stage glycerol feeding approach. Bioresour Technol. 2011;102:10671–8. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2011.09.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Aristidou AA, San KY, Bennett GN. Metabolic engineering of Escherichia coli to enhance recombinant protein production through acetate reduction. Biotechnol Prog. 1995;11:475–8. doi: 10.1021/bp00034a019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Westers L, Westers H, Quax WJ. Bacillus subtilis as cell factory for pharmaceutical proteins: a biotechnological approach to optimize the host organism. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2004;1694:299–310. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2004.02.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Vavrová L, Muchová K, Barák I. Comparison of different Bacillus subtilis expression systems. Res Microbiol. 2010;161:791–7. doi: 10.1016/j.resmic.2010.09.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Ming YM, Wei ZW, Lin CY, Sheng GY. Development of a Bacillus subtilis expression system using the improved Pglv promoter. Microb Cell Fact. 2010;9:55. doi: 10.1186/1475-2859-9-55. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Kouwen TRHM, Nielsen AK, Denham EL, Dubois JYF, Dorenbos R, Rasmussen MD, et al. Contributions of the pre- and pro-regions of a Staphylococcus hyicus lipase to secretion of a heterologous protein by Bacillus subtilis. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2010;76:659–69. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01671-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Ling LF, Xu ZR, Li WF, Shuai JB, Hu CX. Protein secretion pathways in Bacillus subtilis: implication for optimization of heterologous protein secretion. Biotechnol Adv. 2007;25:1–12. doi: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2006.08.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Vitikainen M, Hyyryläinen HL, Kivimäki A, Kontinen VP, Sarvas M. Secretion of heterologous proteins in Bacillus subtilis can be improved by engineering cell components affecting post-translocational protein folding and degradation. J Appl Microbiol. 2005;99:363–75. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2005.02572.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Gamer M, Starnmen S, Biedendieck R, Frode D, Yang Y, Jahn D. Bacillus megaterium - An alternative expression system. J Biotechnol. 2007;131:S220–220. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2007.07.396. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Radha S, Gunasekaran P. Sustained expression of keratinase gene under PxylA and PamyL promoters in the recombinant Bacillus megaterium MS941. Bioresour Technol. 2008;99:5528–37. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2007.10.052. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Panbangred W, Weeradechapon K, Udomvaraphant S, Fujiyama K, Meevootisom V. High expression of the penicillin G acylase gene (pac) from Bacillus megaterium UN1 in its own pac minus mutant. J Appl Microbiol. 2000;89:152–7. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2672.2000.01093.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Borgmeier C, Biedendieck R, Hoffmann K, Jahn D, Meinhardt F. Transcriptome profiling of degU expression reveals unexpected regulatory patterns in Bacillus megaterium and discloses new targets for optimizing expression. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2011;92:583–96. doi: 10.1007/s00253-011-3575-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Kashima Y, Udaka S. High-level production of hyperthermophilic cellulase in the Bacillus brevis expression and secretion system. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 2004;68:235–7. doi: 10.1271/bbb.68.235. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Kobayashi T, Tamura H, Taguchi R, Udaka S, Ikezawa H. High-level expression of Bacillus thuringiensis phosphatidylinositol-specific phospholipase C by the Bacillus brevis host-vector system. Jpn J Med Sci Biol. 1996;49:103–12. doi: 10.7883/yoken1952.49.103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Kajino T, Ohto C, Muramatsu M, Obata S, Udaka S, Yamada Y, et al. A protein disulfide isomerase gene fusion expression system that increases the extracellular productivity of Bacillus brevis. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2000;66:638–42. doi: 10.1128/AEM.66.2.638-642.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Villatoro-Hernández J, Kuipers OP, Saucedo-Cárdenas O, Montes-de-Oca-Luna R. Heterologous protein expression by Lactococcus lactis. Methods Mol Biol. 2012;824:155–65. doi: 10.1007/978-1-61779-433-9_8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Papagianni M, Avramidis N. Engineering the central pathways in Lactococcus lactis: functional expression of the phosphofructokinase (pfk) and alternative oxidase (aox1) genes from Aspergillus niger in Lactococcus lactis facilitates improved carbon conversion rates under oxidizing conditions. Enzyme Microb Technol. 2012;51:125–30. doi: 10.1016/j.enzmictec.2012.04.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Li JJ, Zhang W, Wang C, Yu Q, Dai RR, Pei XF. Lactococcus lactis expressing food-grade β-galactosidase alleviates lactose intolerance symptoms in post-weaning Balb/c mice. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2012;96:1499–506. doi: 10.1007/s00253-012-3977-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Jendresen CB, Martinussen J, Kilstrup M. The PurR regulon in Lactococcus lactis - transcriptional regulation of the purine nucleotide metabolism and translational machinery. Microbiology. 2012;158:2026–38. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.059576-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Guo TT, Kong J, Zhang L, Zhang CC, Hu SM. Fine tuning of the lactate and diacetyl production through promoter engineering in Lactococcus lactis. PLoS One. 2012;7:e36296. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0036296. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Noreen N, Hooi WY, Baradaran A, Rosfarizan M, Sieo CC, Rosli MI, et al. Lactococcus lactis M4, a potential host for the expression of heterologous proteins. Microb Cell Fact. 2011;10:28. doi: 10.1186/1475-2859-10-28. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Marreddy RKR, Pinto JPC, Wolters JC, Geertsma ER, Fusetti F, Permentier HP, et al. The response of Lactococcus lactis to membrane protein production. PLoS One. 2011;6:e24060. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0024060. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Morello E, Bermúdez-Humarán LG, Llull D, Solé V, Miraglio N, Langella P, et al. Lactococcus lactis, an efficient cell factory for recombinant protein production and secretion. J Mol Microbiol Biotechnol. 2008;14:48–58. doi: 10.1159/000106082. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Salonen N, Nyyssölä A, Salonen K, Turunen O. Bifidobacterium longum L-arabinose isomerase--overexpression in Lactococcus lactis, purification, and characterization. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2012;168:392–405. doi: 10.1007/s12010-012-9783-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Hollmann A, Saviello M, Delfederico L, Saraiva TD, Barh D, Jain N, et al. Tight controlled expression and secretion of Lactobacillus brevis SlpA in Lactococcus lactis. Biotechnol Lett. 2012;34:1275–81. doi: 10.1007/s10529-012-0887-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123.Narita J, Ishida S, Okano K, Kimura S, Fukuda H, Kondo A. Improvement of protein production in lactic acid bacteria using 5′-untranslated leader sequence of slpA from Lactobacillus acidophilus. Improvement in protein production using UTLS. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2006;73:366–73. doi: 10.1007/s00253-006-0477-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124.Liang X, Zhang L, Zhong J, Huan L. Secretory expression of a heterologous nattokinase in Lactococcus lactis. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2007;75:95–101. doi: 10.1007/s00253-006-0809-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125.Celik E, Calık P. Production of recombinant proteins by yeast cells. Biotechnol Adv. 2012;30:1108–18. doi: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2011.09.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126.Voronovsky AY, Ryabova OB, Verba OV, Ishchuk OP, Dmytruk KV, Sibirny AA. Expression of xylA genes encoding xylose isomerases from Escherichia coli and Streptomyces coelicolor in the methylotrophic yeast Hansenula polymorpha. FEMS Yeast Res. 2005;5:1055–62. doi: 10.1016/j.femsyr.2005.09.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127.Zhou XX, Chandarajoti K, Pham TQ, Liu RP, Liu J. Expression of heparan sulfate sulfotransferases in Kluyveromyces lactis and preparation of 3′-phosphoadenosine-5′-phosphosulfate. Glycobiology. 2011;21:771–80. doi: 10.1093/glycob/cwr001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128.Kumar R, Singh J. Expression and secretion of a prokaryotic protein streptokinase without glycosylation and degradation in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Yeast. 2004;21:1343–58. doi: 10.1002/yea.1184. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129.Liu G-L, Li Y, Zhou H-X, Chi Z-M, Madzak C. Over-expression of a bacterial chitosanase gene in Yarrowia lipolytica and chitosan hydrolysis by the recombinant chitosanase. J Mol Catal, B Enzym. 2012;83:100–7. doi: 10.1016/j.molcatb.2012.07.012. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 130.Böer E, Piontek M, Kunze G. Xplor 2--an optimized transformation/expression system for recombinant protein production in the yeast Arxula adeninivorans. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2009;84:583–94. doi: 10.1007/s00253-009-2167-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131.Nishikawa M, Hagishita T, Yurimoto H, Kato N, Sakai Y, Hatanaka T. Primary structure and expression of peroxisomal acetylspermidine oxidase in the methylotrophic yeast Candida boidinii. FEBS Lett. 2000;476:150–4. doi: 10.1016/S0014-5793(00)01708-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132.Liu YP, Pan JF, Wei PL, Zhu JZ, Huang L, Cai J, et al. Efficient expression and purification of recombinant alcohol oxidase in Pichia pastoris. Biotechnol Bioprocess Eng. 2012;17:693–702. doi: 10.1007/s12257-011-0660-z. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 133.Jia D, Li J, Liu L, Zhang D, Yang Y, Du G, et al. High-level expression, purification, and enzymatic characterization of truncated poly(vinyl alcohol) dehydrogenase in methylotrophic yeast Pichia pastoris. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2013;97:1113–20. doi: 10.1007/s00253-012-3986-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 134.Damaso MCT, Almeida MS, Kurtenbach E, Martins OB, Pereira N, Jr., Andrade CM, et al. Optimized expression of a thermostable xylanase from Thermomyces lanuginosus in Pichia pastoris. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2003;69:6064–72. doi: 10.1128/AEM.69.10.6064-6072.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 135.Sasagawa T, Matsui M, Kobayashi Y, Otagiri M, Moriya S, Sakamoto Y, et al. High-throughput recombinant gene expression systems in Pichia pastoris using newly developed plasmid vectors. Plasmid. 2011;65:65–9. doi: 10.1016/j.plasmid.2010.08.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 136.Waterham HR, Digan ME, Koutz PJ, Lair SV, Cregg JM. Isolation of the Pichia pastoris glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase gene and regulation and use of its promoter. Gene. 1997;186:37–44. doi: 10.1016/S0378-1119(96)00675-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 137.Wu JM, Lin JC, Chieng LL, Lee CK, Hsu TA. Combined use of GAP and AOX1 promoter to enhance the expression of human granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor in Pichia pastoris. Enzyme Microb Technol. 2003;33:453–9. doi: 10.1016/S0141-0229(03)00147-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 138.Xie J, Zhou Q, Du P, Gan R, Ye Q. Use of different carbon sources in cultivation of recombinant Pichia pastoris for angiostatin production. Enzyme Microb Technol. 2005;36:210–6. doi: 10.1016/j.enzmictec.2004.06.010. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 139.Wang Y, Wang Z, Du G, Hua Z, Liu L, Li J, et al. Enhancement of alkaline polygalacturonate lyase production in recombinant Pichia pastoris according to the ratio of methanol to cell concentration. Bioresour Technol. 2009;100:1343–9. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2008.07.049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 140.Wang Z, Wang Y, Zhang D, Li J, Hua Z, Du G, et al. Enhancement of cell viability and alkaline polygalacturonate lyase production by sorbitol co-feeding with methanol in Pichia pastoris fermentation. Bioresour Technol. 2010;101:1318–23. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2009.09.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 141.Macauley-Patrick S, Fazenda ML, McNeil B, Harvey LM. Heterologous protein production using the Pichia pastoris expression system. Yeast. 2005;22:249–70. doi: 10.1002/yea.1208. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 142.Tang YQ, Xiao JM, Chen Y, Yu YG, Xiao XL, Yu YS, et al. Secretory expression and characterization of a novel peroxiredoxin for zearalenone detoxification in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microbiol Res. 2013;168:6–11. doi: 10.1016/j.micres.2012.08.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 143.Demain AL, Vaishnav P. Production of recombinant proteins by microbes and higher organisms. Biotechnol Adv. 2009;27:297–306. doi: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2009.01.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 144.López-López O, Fuciños P, Pastrana L, Rúa ML, Cerdán ME, González-Siso MI. Heterologous expression of an esterase from Thermus thermophilus HB27 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Biotechnol. 2010;145:226–32. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2009.11.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 145.Mormeneo M, Pastor FJ, Zueco J. Efficient expression of a Paenibacillus barcinonensis endoglucanase in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol. 2012;39:115–23. doi: 10.1007/s10295-011-1006-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 146.Valkonen M, Penttilä M, Saloheimo M. Effects of inactivation and constitutive expression of the unfolded- protein response pathway on protein production in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2003;69:2065–72. doi: 10.1128/AEM.69.4.2065-2072.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 147.Kanjou N, Nagao A, Ohmiya Y, Ohgiya S. Yeast mutant with efficient secretion identified by a novel secretory reporter, Cluc. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2007;358:429–34. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2007.04.140. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 148.van Rensburg E, den Haan R, Smith J, van Zyl WH, Görgens JF. The metabolic burden of cellulase expression by recombinant Saccharomyces cerevisiae Y294 in aerobic batch culture. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2012;96:197–209. doi: 10.1007/s00253-012-4037-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 149.Mayer AF, Hellmuth K, Schlieker H, Lopez-Ulibarri R, Oertel S, Dahlems U, et al. An expression system matures: a highly efficient and cost-effective process for phytase production by recombinant strains of Hansenula polymorpha. Biotechnol Bioeng. 1999;63:373–81. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0290(19990505)63:3&#x0003c;373::AID-BIT14&#x0003e;3.0.CO;2-T. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 150.Gidijala L, Bovenberg RAL, Klaassen P, van der Klei IJ, Veenhuis M, Kiel JAKW. Production of functionally active Penicillium chrysogenum isopenicillin N synthase in the yeast Hansenula polymorpha. BMC Biotechnol. 2008;8:29. doi: 10.1186/1472-6750-8-29. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 151.Kottmeier K, Müller C, Huber R, Büchs J. Increased product formation induced by a directed secondary substrate limitation in a batch Hansenula polymorpha culture. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2010;86:93–101. doi: 10.1007/s00253-009-2285-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 152.Yang C-H, Huang Y-C, Chen C-Y, Wen C-Y. Heterologous expression of Thermobifida fusca thermostable alpha-amylase in Yarrowia lipolytica and its application in boiling stable resistant sago starch preparation. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol. 2010;37:953–60. doi: 10.1007/s10295-010-0745-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 153.van Ooyen AJJ, Dekker P, Huang M, Olsthoorn MM, Jacobs DI, Colussi PA, et al. Heterologous protein production in the yeast Kluyveromyces lactis. FEMS Yeast Res. 2006;6:381–92. doi: 10.1111/j.1567-1364.2006.00049.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 154.Rocha SN, Abrahão-Neto J, Cerdán ME, Gombert AK, González-Siso MI. Heterologous expression of a thermophilic esterase in Kluyveromyces yeasts. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2011;89:375–85. doi: 10.1007/s00253-010-2869-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 155.Kumari A, Gupta R. Extracellular expression and characterization of thermostable lipases, LIP8, LIP14 and LIP18, from Yarrowia lipolytica. Biotechnol Lett. 2012;34:1733–9. doi: 10.1007/s10529-012-0958-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 156.Donnini C, Farina F, Neglia B, Compagno MC, Uccelletti D, Goffrini P, et al. Improved production of heterologous proteins by a glucose repression-defective mutant of Kluyveromyces lactis. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2004;70:2632–8. doi: 10.1128/AEM.70.5.2632-2638.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 157.Böer E, Breuer FS, Weniger M, Denter S, Piontek M, Kunze G. Large-scale production of tannase using the yeast Arxula adeninivorans. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2011;92:105–14. doi: 10.1007/s00253-011-3320-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 158.Sieiro C, Poza M, Vilanova M, Villa TG. Heterologous expression of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae PGU1 gene in Schizosaccharomyces pombe yields an enzyme with more desirable properties for the food industry. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2003;69:1861–5. doi: 10.1128/AEM.69.3.1861-1865.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 159.Idiris A, Tohda H, Kumagai H, Takegawa K. Engineering of protein secretion in yeast: strategies and impact on protein production. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2010;86:403–17. doi: 10.1007/s00253-010-2447-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 160.Gauthier T, Wang X, Sifuentes Dos Santos J, Fysikopoulos A, Tadrist S, Canlet C, et al. Trypacidin, a spore-borne toxin from Aspergillus fumigatus, is cytotoxic to lung cells. PLoS One. 2012;7:e29906. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0029906. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 161.Ramamoorthy V, Shantappa S, Dhingra S, Calvo AM. veA-dependent RNA-pol II transcription elongation factor-like protein, RtfA, is associated with secondary metabolism and morphological development in Aspergillus nidulans. Mol Microbiol. 2012;85:795–814. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2012.08142.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 162.Cortés-Espinosa DV, Absalón AE, Sanchez N, Loera O, Rodríguez-Vázquez R, Fernández FJ. Heterologous expression of manganese peroxidase in Aspergillus niger and its effect on phenanthrene removal from soil. J Mol Microbiol Biotechnol. 2011;21:120–9. doi: 10.1159/000331563. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 163.Alriksson B, Rose SH, van Zyl WH, Sjöde A, Nilvebrant N-O, Jönsson LJ. Cellulase production from spent lignocellulose hydrolysates by recombinant Aspergillus niger. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2009;75:2366–74. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02479-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 164.van den Berg BA, Reinders MJT, Hulsman M, Wu L, Pel HJ, Roubos JA, et al. Exploring sequence characteristics related to high-level production of secreted proteins in Aspergillus niger. PLoS One. 2012;7:e45869. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0045869. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 165.Sharma R, Katoch M, Govindappa N, Srivastava PS, Sastry KN, Qazi GN. Evaluation of the catalase promoter for expressing the alkaline xylanase gene (alx) in Aspergillus niger. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2012;327:33–40. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2011.02454.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 166.Uchima CA, Tokuda G, Watanabe H, Kitamoto K, Arioka M. Heterologous expression and characterization of a glucose-stimulated β-glucosidase from the termite Neotermes koshunensis in Aspergillus oryzae. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2011;89:1761–71. doi: 10.1007/s00253-010-2963-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 167.Hirayama K, Watanabe H, Tokuda G, Kitamoto K, Arioka M. Purification and characterization of termite endogenous beta-1,4-endoglucanases produced in Aspergillus oryzae. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 2010;74:1680–6. doi: 10.1271/bbb.100296. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 168.Yoon J, Maruyama J-i, Kitamoto K. Disruption of ten protease genes in the filamentous fungus Aspergillus oryzae highly improves production of heterologous proteins. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2011;89:747–59. doi: 10.1007/s00253-010-2937-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 169.Yoon J, Aishan T, Maruyama J-i, Kitamoto K. Enhanced production and secretion of heterologous proteins by the filamentous fungus Aspergillus oryzae via disruption of vacuolar protein sorting receptor gene Aovps10. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2010;76:5718–27. doi: 10.1128/AEM.03087-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 170.Zou G, Shi S, Jiang Y, van den Brink J, de Vries RP, Chen L, et al. Construction of a cellulase hyper-expression system in Trichoderma reesei by promoter and enzyme engineering. Microb Cell Fact. 2012;11:21. doi: 10.1186/1475-2859-11-21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 171.Lv D, Wang W, Wei D. Construction of two vectors for gene expression in Trichoderma reesei. Plasmid. 2012;67:67–71. doi: 10.1016/j.plasmid.2011.10.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 172.Mäntylä A, Paloheimo M, Hakola S, Lindberg E, Leskinen S, Kallio J, et al. Production in Trichoderma reesei of three xylanases from Chaetomium thermophilum: a recombinant thermoxylanase for biobleaching of kraft pulp. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2007;76:377–86. doi: 10.1007/s00253-007-1020-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 173.Qin L-N, Cai F-R, Dong X-R, Huang Z-B, Tao Y, Huang J-Z, et al. Improved production of heterologous lipase in Trichoderma reesei by RNAi mediated gene silencing of an endogenic highly expressed gene. Bioresour Technol. 2012;109:116–22. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2012.01.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 174.Sugiura T, Yamagishi K, Kimura T, Nishida T, Kawagishi H, Hirai H. Cloning and homologous expression of novel lignin peroxidase genes in the white-rot fungus Phanerochaete sordida YK-624. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 2009;73:1793–8. doi: 10.1271/bbb.90152. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 175.Teixeira JA, Gonçalves DB, de Queiroz MV, de Araújo EF. Improved pectinase production in Penicillium griseoroseum recombinant strains. J Appl Microbiol. 2011;111:818–25. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2011.05099.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 176.Navarrete M, Callegari E, Eyzaguirre J. The effect of acetylated xylan and sugar beet pulp on the expression and secretion of enzymes by Penicillium purpurogenum. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2012;93:723–41. doi: 10.1007/s00253-011-3744-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 177.Mertens JA, Skory CD, Ibrahim AS. Plasmids for expression of heterologous proteins in Rhizopus oryzae. Arch Microbiol. 2006;186:41–50. doi: 10.1007/s00203-006-0121-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Bioengineered are provided here courtesy of Taylor & Francis

RESOURCES