Skip to main content
PMC home page
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2013 Jul 31;3:2326. doi: 10.1038/srep02326

A self-cleaning underwater superoleophobic mesh for oil-water separation

Lianbin Zhang 1, Yujiang Zhong 1, Dongkyu Cha 2, Peng Wang 1,a
PMCID: PMC3728594  PMID: 23900109

Abstract

Oil–water separation has recently become a global challenging task because of the frequent occurrence of oil spill accidents due to the offshore oil production and transportation, and there is an increasing demand for the development of effective and inexpensive approaches for the cleaning-up of the oily pollution in water system. In this study, a self-cleaning underwater superoleophobic mesh that can be used for oil-water separation is prepared by the layer-by-layer (LbL) assembly of sodium silicate and TiO2 nanoparticles on the stainless steel mesh. The integration of the self-cleaning property into the all-inorganic separation mesh by using TiO2 enables the convenient removal of the contaminants by ultraviolet (UV) illumination, and allows for the facile recovery of the separation ability of the contaminated mesh, making it promising for practial oil-water separation applications.

Advanced materials with desirable wettability are very important in oil/water related applications, such as oily industrial wastewater treatment and oil spill cleanup1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13. Recently, inspired by the remarkably oil-repellent characteristic of fish scales in aqueous media, the membranes with hydrophilic and underwater superoleophobic properties have been developed and shown to be promising materials for oil and water separation14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22. These water-loving and water-permeable separation membranes are advantageous over traditional hydrophobic and oleophilic materials for two reasons: (1) they allow water to pass, which effectively avoids or reduces the possibility of membrane clogging by the viscous oil; (2) they prevent the formation of the water barrier between the membranes and the oil phase, which would otherwise occur with the conventional hydrophobic and oleophilic separation materials due to the fact that water is generally heavier than oil phase and it thus prevents the contact between oil and separation membranes.

The preparation of the hydrophilic and underwater superoleophobic separation membranes are based on hydrophilic surface modification of base materials along with generation of surface micro-nano structures, which contributes to surface roughness and amplifies surface wetting behaviors17,18,19,20,21,22. The current methods for surface hydrophilic modification can be categorized into two groups: (1) hydrophilic organic polymer-based grafting17,18,19,20 and (2) inorganic material coating21,22. Generally speaking, the inorganic coating is more desirable than the polymeric one because the latter usually suffers from poor stability and becomes unstable under harsh conditions which occur during the separation process. However, for the current inorganic coating methods, hydrothermal-based synthesis procedure is generally required21,22, which prohibits large-scale production and thus not suitable for practical applications. Furthermore, in practical applications the hydrophilic or superhydrophilic surfaces of the separation materials are prone to contamination by low-surface-energy substances due to their intrinsically high surface energy9,23,24. These low-surface-energy contaminants, once adsorbed, are difficult to remove and often cause the surface wetting behaviors to deteriorate, leading to the materials to lose their separation performance. It is for this reason that frequent washing-based maintenance to the separation membranes is generally required, which significantly increases the operation cost of these separation processes. It should be noted that very recently, Feng and coworkers reported a hydrothermal preparation of a double-layer TiO2-based mesh membrane with superhydrophobicity and superoleophilicity, which could be used for both the separation of bulk oil from water and the degradation of dissolved pollutants in water25. However, their work did not target the contamination problem of the separation mesh. Based on these, a facile and low-cost approach for preparation of inorganic-coating-based oil-water separation membranes, which have self-cleaning capability, is highly desired.

Layer-by-layer (LbL) assembly, which involves alternate deposition of species (building blocks) with complementary interactions to prepare composite coatings, is a versatile platform for fabricating various kinds of coatings with well-tailored chemical compositions and architectures on almost any substrate26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34. We believe LbL assembly holds a great potential for functionalizing base materials towards solving the aforementioned problems that occur with the previous oil-water separation materials based on the following considerations: (1) With LbL assembly, building block species are deposited in a rationally predesigned fashion, which enables judicially targeted functionalities and even multi-functionalities to be precisely integrated in a single coating and thus holds promise of imparting self-cleaning and/or anti-fouling functionalities into thus-prepared oil-water separating membranes. (2) The LbL assembly enables easy adjustment of the surface micro-nano structure of the coating, which is required for special wetting behaviors. (3) The LbL technique allows for the large-scale deposition of functional coatings on non-flat substrates with irregular and complicated morphology, which makes it scalable, versatile, and thus low-cost for oil-water separation applications.

Herein, we for the first time demonstrate the ease and utility of LbL assembly for the preparation of all-inorganic-coating-based oil-water separation materials. A proof-of-concept is provided by LbL assembly of sodium silicate and TiO2 nanoparticles on a stainless steel mesh to fabricate an underwater superoleophobic separation membrane with self-cleaning ability. The thus-prepared mesh could effectively separate water from oil-water mixture and the UV illumination provides convenient way to self-clean the contaminated mesh. The current study contributes to the development of advanced oil-water separation materials for practical applications.

Results

The choice of the steel mesh here as the base material is due to its inherent porous structure, which is suitable for separation applications, its good mechanical and chemical stability, as well as its easy availability and low cost. The self-cleaning property is imparted into the mesh-membrane by using photocatalytic TiO2 as one of the LbL building blocks, which provides a convenient solution to the contamination problem35,36,37. After 20 cycles of LbL assembly of sodium silicate and TiO2, which is driven by electrostatic interaction between the negatively charged sodium silicate and positively charged TiO2, a nanostructured composite coating of hydrophilic silica and self-cleaning TiO2 (denoted as (silicate/TiO2)*20), was formed uniformly on the surface of the stainless steel mesh. The LbL assembly of sodium silicate and TiO2 in this work is conducted by a non-drying LbL assembly process, in which no intermittent drying steps are involved during the deposition procedure38. As has been reported, the deposition of the rigid building blocks of sodium silicate and TiO2 onto the substrates is in their aggregated forms, and the non-drying LbL assembly process preserves the aggregates on the surface, leading to the loose stack of the building blocks and thus producing the nanostructured coating38, which along with micro-scale mesh wires is essential for the extreme wetting behaviors. Figure 1 shows the scanning electronic microscopy (SEM) images of the original stainless steel mesh and the one after the LbL assembly of (silicate/TiO2)*20 coating. The original mesh has an average pore diameter of ~ 190 μm, and the knitting wires have a diameter of ~ 110 μm. The magnified view in the inset of Fig. 1a reveals that the original wires have smooth surface. After the LbL assembly of (silicate/TiO2)*20 coating, the macroscopic morphology of the mesh did not show any significant change (Fig. 1b), and a layer of nano-aggregates with the size from several tens to several hundred nanometers was uniformly formed on the surface of the wires (inset of Fig. 1b). The energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) measurement reveals the presence of Ti and Si on the surface (Fig. 1c), and the SEM-EDS elemental mapping results indicate a uniform distribution of the Ti and Si on the surface of the wires (insets of Fig. 1c). We found that 20 cycles of the LbL assembly of sodium silicate and TiO2 resulted in a sufficient coverage of the nano-aggregates on the mesh surface while when fewer cycles (e.g., 10 cycles) were assembled, only island-like aggregates were discretely distributed on the wire surface, with the underneath stainless steel exposed (see Supplementary Fig. S1, and Fig. S2 online), which is undesirable.

Figure 1. Morphology and surface composition of the stainless steel mesh after the LbL assembly of (silicate/TiO2)*20 coating.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

SEM images of the original stainless steel mesh (a), and the (silicate/TiO2)*20 coated mesh (b). Insets in (a) and (b) show the magnified view of the knitting wire surfaces. (c) EDS spectrum of the (silicate/TiO2)*20 coated mesh. The insets in (c) show the SEM-EDS elemental mapping of Si and Ti.

The wettability of water and oil on the (silicate/TiO2)*20 coated mesh was evaluated by the contact angle measurements. In air, the water wetting behavior on the (silicate/TiO2)*20 coated mesh was greatly enhanced compared with the original uncoated mesh, which had a water contact angle of 127.5°. As shown in Fig. 2a, when the water droplet contacted with the surface of the (silicate/TiO2)*20 coated mesh, it quickly spread and penetrated the mesh (within 16 ms), with a contact angle of ~ 21.9° above the mesh. When more water droplets were added on the mesh surface, the water could easily drip down, indicating the good hydrophilicity and permeability of the coated mesh to water, which was a combined effect of the hydrophilic nature of the LbL assembled coating and the surface micro-nano hierarchical structures generated in the non-drying LbL assembly process. The coated mesh also exhibited oleophilic property in air with a hexadecane contact angle of ~ 18.9° above the mesh surface (Fig. 2c). Meanwhile, the current LbL assembly method enables the silicate/TiO2 coatings to be readily deposited on stainless steel meshes with different sizes, and after coating these meshes all exhibited good hydrophilicity and water permeable property (see Supplementary Fig. S3 online).

Figure 2. Wetting behaviors of the (silicate/TiO2)*20 coated stainless steel mesh.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

(a) Time-resolved snapshots from the contact angle measurement video of a water droplet contacting on the (silicate/TiO2)*20 coated mesh in air. (b) Shape of a water droplet on the original mesh. (c) Shape of a hexadecane droplet on the (silicate/TiO2)*20 coated mesh in air. (d) Contact angles of a series of typical oil droplets on the coated mesh in aqueous media. Insets in (d) show the shapes of the oil droplets on the mesh surface.

The underwater oil wettability of the mesh was evaluated by immersing the (silicate/TiO2)*20 coated mesh in aqueous media. Figure 2d shows the contact angles of a series of typical oil droplets on the coated mesh in aqueous media, and the shapes of these oil droplets were also presented as the insets. Without any exception, all of the oil contact angles were larger than 150° on the coated mesh, confirming its underwater superoleophobic property. Without the coating, the original stainless steel mesh exhibited oleophilic property (see Supplementary Fig. S4 online). Furthermore, we found that these oil droplets were quite unstable on the (silicate/TiO2)*20 coated mesh surface and they could easily detach from the surface by gentle disturbance, suggesting a low adhesion of the surface to the oil droplets in the aqueous medium. As previously shown, the (silicate/TiO2)*20 coated mesh exhibited a micro-nano hierarchical surface structure and hydrophilic nature, so water could be trapped in these micro-nano structures when the mesh was immersed in aqueous medium. Because of the high repellency between polar mesh surface (water and silica) and non-polar oil phase, the mesh surface exhibits oleophobicity, which is further amplified by the surface micro-nano hierarchical structures (i.e., surface roughness), leading to an underwater superoleophobic surface14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22.

Having demonstrated the underwater superoleophobicity, as well as the hydrophilicity and the water permeable properties of the coated mesh, the coated mesh was then used for the separation of oil and water mixture. As shown in Fig. 3a, the stainless steel mesh with the (silicate/TiO2)*20 coating was fixed between two glass tubes, and then a mixture of commercial No.95 gasoline and water (1:1, v:v) was poured into the upper glass tube (see Supplementary Movie S1 online). Because of the underwater superoleophobic property and the higher density of water than gasoline, the water in the mixture passed through the mesh quickly, and no visible oil was observed in the collected water. As shown in Fig. 3b, a complete separation was achieved for the oil-water mixture. Gravity was the only available force and no other external force was used during the separation.

Figure 3. oil-water separation by the (silicate/TiO2)*20 coated stainless steel mesh.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

(a) Oil-water separation by the (silicate/TiO2)*20 coated mesh. The mesh was pre-wetted by water and fixed between two glass tubes as the separation membrane. A mixture of gasoline and water was poured into the upper glass tube. The water passed through the membrane, whereas the gasoline remained on top of the membrane in the upper glass tube (right panel). (b) Photograph shows collected water and gasoline after the separation. No visible oil and water was observed in the collected water and oil, respectively, indicating a complete separation.

Discussion

As discussed earlier, self-cleaning property of a separation mesh is very desirable. It is well known that under ultraviolet (UV) light illumination TiO2 materials can generate photo-electrons and holes, which then react with oxygen and water to produce highly reactive species of superoxide anions and hydroxyl radicals35,36,37. The highly reactive species can then decompose and thus remove organic contaminants and fouling species that are absorbed on the surface of separation membrane. In order to evaluate the self-cleaning capability of the silicate/TiO2 coated mesh, the mesh was first contaminated with a model contaminant of oleic acid. Once contaminated by oleic acid, the surface of the (silicate/TiO2)*20 coated mesh lost its hydrophilicity and the underwater superoleophobic property, and showed a hydrophobic property with a water contact angle of ~ 105° in air, which undesirably led to its inability to separate oil and water (see Supplementary Fig. S5, and Fig. S6 online). With the oleic acid contamination, both water and oil passed through the (silicate/TiO2)*20 coated mesh indiscriminately. The contaminated mesh was then subject to UV light illumination (wavelengths centered at 360 nm) and under UV exposure for about 30 minutes, the mesh restored its hydrophilicity, with water contact angle returning to its original value of ~ 20° (Fig. 4a). The recovery of the mesh's hydrophilicity in air was a result of the removal of the surface-absorbed oleic acid.

Figure 4. self-cleaning ability of the (silicate/TiO2)*20 coated stainless steel mesh.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

(a) Change of water contact angle of the oleic-acid-contaminated meshes as a function of UV illumination time. (Inline graphic) (silicate/TiO2)*20 coated mesh; (Inline graphic) PDDA/silicate coated mesh; (Inline graphic) original mesh. (Inline graphic) original mesh without oleic acid contamination. (b) Water contact angle changes on the (silicate/TiO2)*20 coated mesh in the five cycles of the oleic acid contamination and UV illumination based recovery. (Inline graphic) (silicate/TiO2)*20 coated mesh; (Inline graphic) after oleic acid contamination; (Inline graphic) after UV illumination recovery.

As a comparison, the oleic-acid-contaminated (1) original mesh (i.e., unmodified with the LbL assembled coating) and (2) mesh coated with hydrophilic PDDA/silicate multilayer without TiO2 (see Supplementary experimental details online), both did not show any significant change in their water contact angles (larger than 90°) before and after the UV exposure (see Supplementary Fig. S7 online). These results demonstrate that the self-cleaning property of the (silicate/TiO2)*20 coated mesh is indeed from the TiO2 component in the LbL assembled coating. Furthermore, after five cycles of oleic acid contamination and UV illumination recovery, the (silicate/TiO2)*20 coated mesh still exhibited hydrophilic property as well as the underwater superoleophobicity similar to the uncontaminated (silicate/TiO2)*20 mesh (Fig. 4b, and Supplementary Fig. S8 online), indicating the good reproducibility and stability of the silicate/TiO2 composite coating. With the UV-illumination based self-cleaning, the mesh could be used over again for the same oil-water separation with the same performance as before the contamination. The fact that the LbL assembled silicate/TiO2 coating is entirely inorganic guarantees the integrity of the coating during the UV-based self-cleaning treatment.

In conclusion, we showed an underwater superoleophobic mesh with the self-cleaning ability could be readily prepared by a facile LbL assembly of sodium silicate and TiO2 nanoparticles on stainless steel mesh. The thus-prepared mesh could effectively separate water from the oil-water mixture and the UV illumination is a convenient approach to the self-cleaning of the contaminated separation mesh. The current study contributes to the development of advanced oil-water separation materials for practical applications.

Methods

Materials and chemicals

Stainless steel mesh (80 mesh) was purchased from Alfa Aesar. Sodium silicate solution, titanium isopropoxide, poly(diallyldimethylammonium chloride) (PDDA, 20 wt%, Mw ca. 100 000−200 000), silicone oil, 1,2-dichloroethane, diiodomethane, hexadecane, hexane, 1,3,5-trimethylbenzene, oleic acid, and mineral oil were all purchased from Sigma-Aldrich and used as received. Water purified in a Milli-Q (MilliPore) system was used during all the experiments. The colloidal TiO2 suspension was prepared by the controlled hydrolysis of titanium isopropoxide according to a previous reported method39. No. 95 gasoline was purchased from a local gas station.

Fabrication of silicate/TiO2 coatings on stainless steel mesh

The LbL assembly of silicate/TiO2 coatings on the stainless steel meshes was conducted automatically by a programmable dipping robot (Dipping Robot DR-3, Riegler&Kirstein GmbH) at room temperature. A pre-cleaned stainless steel mesh was first immersed in aqueous PDDA solution (1.0 mg mL−1) for 20 min to render its surface positively charged, followed by rinsing with water and drying with N2 flow. Then sodium silicate and TiO2 were alternately deposited on the PDDA-modified mesh surface38. The mesh was first immersed in a solution of sodium silicate (0.15 M, pH = 11.6) for 10 min, followed by rinsing in three water baths for 1 min each. Then the mesh was immediately transferred to and stay in a TiO2 colloidal suspension (1.3 mg mL−1 pH = 2.5) for 10 min, followed by rinsing in three water baths for 1 min each. By repeating the above deposition process in a cyclic fashion, silicate/TiO2 composite coating was prepared. The assembly of silicate and TiO2 was repeated until the desired cycle number was reached. No drying step was used in the deposition procedure unless it was in the last layer. The LbL assembled silicate/TiO2 coatings with n cycle deposition are denoted as (silicate/TiO2)*n.

Author Contributions

L.B.Z. and P.W. conceived the project and planned the experiments. L.B.Z. and Y.J.Z. prepared the samples and carried out most of the experiments (wettability measurements, oil-water separation, and self-cleaning). D.K.C. carried out the SEM and SEM-EDS elemental mapping measurements. L.B.Z. and P.W. analyzed the data and wrote the paper. All authors discussed the results and commented on the paper.

Supplementary Material

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Information

srep02326-s1.pdf (962.6KB, pdf)
Supplementary Information

Movie S1

Download video file (430.9KB, mov)

Acknowledgments

The authors thank King Abdullah University of Science and Technology for research funding support.

References

  1. Liu K. S., Tian Y. & Jiang L. Bio-inspired superoleophobic and smart materials: design, fabrication, and application. Prog. Mater. Sci. 58, 503–564 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  2. Darmanin T., Taffin de Givenchy E., Amigoni S. & Guittard F. Superhydrophobic surfaces by electrochemical processes. Adv. Mater. 25, 1378–1394 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Drelich J., Chibowski E., Meng D. D. & Terpilowski K. Hydrophilic and superhydrophilic surfaces and materials. Soft Matter 7, 9804–9828 (2011). [Google Scholar]
  4. Zhang X., Shi F., Niu J., Jiang Y. G. & Wang Z. Q. Superhydrophobic surfaces: from structural control to functional application. J. Mater. Chem. 18, 621–633 (2008). [Google Scholar]
  5. Sun T. L., Feng L., Gao X. F. & Jiang L. Bioinspired surfaces with special wettability. Acc. Chem. Res. 38, 644–652 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Zhang W. B. et al. Superhydrophobic and superoleophilic PVDF membranes for effective separation of water-in-oil emulsions with high flux. Adv. Mater. 25, 2071–2076 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Liang H. M. et al. Macroscopic-scale template synthesis of robust carbonaceous nanofiber hydrogels and aerogels and their applications. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 51, 5101–5105 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Nguyen D. D., Tai N. H., Lee S. B. & Kuo W. S. Superhydrophobic and superoleophilic properties of graphene-based sponges fabricated using a facile dip coating method. Energy Environ. Sci. 5, 7908–7912 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  9. Yang J. et al. Superhydrophilic–superoleophobic coatings. J. Mater. Chem. 22, 2834–2837 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  10. Zhang J. P. & Seeger S. Polyester materials with superwetting silicone nanofilaments for oil/water separation and selective oil absorption. Adv. Funct. Mater. 21, 4699–4704 (2011). [Google Scholar]
  11. Gui X. C. et al. Carbon nanotube sponges. Adv. Mater. 22, 617–621 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Yuan J. K. et al. Superwetting nanowire membranes for selective absorption. Nat. Nanotechnol. 3, 332–336 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Feng L. et al. A super-hydrophobic and super-oleophilic coating mesh film for the separation of oil and water. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 43, 2012–2014 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Liu M. J., Wang S. T., Wei Z. X., Song Y. L. & Jiang L. Bioinspired design of a superoleophobic and low adhesive water/solid interface. Adv. Mater. 21, 665–669 (2009). [Google Scholar]
  15. Lin L. et al. Bio-inspired hierarchical macromolecule–nanoclay hydrogels for robust underwater superoleophobicity. Adv. Mater. 22, 4826–4830 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Xu L. P. et al. An ion-induced low-oil-adhesion organic/inorganic hybrid film for stable superoleophobicity in seawater. Adv. Mater. 25, 606–611 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Xue Z. X. et al. A novel superhydrophilic and underwater superoleophobic hydrogel-coated mesh for oil/water separation. Adv. Mater. 23, 4270–4273 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Zhang L. B., Zhang Z. H. & Wang P. Smart surfaces with switchable superoleophilicity and superoleophobicity in aqueous media: toward controllable oil/water separation. NPG Asia. Mater. 4, e8 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  19. Kota A. K., Kwon G., Choi W., Mabry J. M. & Tuteja A. Hygro-responsive membranes for effective oil–water separation. Nat. Commun. 3, 10. 1038/ncomms2027 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Zhu Y. Z. et al. A novel zwitterionic polyelectrolyte grafted PVDF membrane for thoroughly separating oil from water with ultrahigh efficiency. J. Mater. Chem. A 1, 5758–5765 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  21. Tian D. L. et al. Photo-induced water–oil separation based on switchable superhydrophobicity–superhydrophilicity and underwater superoleophobicity of the aligned ZnO nanorod array-coated mesh films. J. Mater. Chem. 22, 19652–19657 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  22. Wen Q., Di J. C., Jiang L., Yu J. H. & Xu R. R. Zeolite-coated mesh film for efficient oil–water separation. Chem. Sci. 4, 591–595 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  23. Howarter J. A. & Youngblood J. P. Self-cleaning and next generation anti-fog surfaces and coatings. Macromol. Rapid. Commun. 29, 455–466 (2008). [Google Scholar]
  24. Howarter J. A. & Youngblood J. P. Self-cleaning and anti-fog surfaces via stimuli-responsive polymer brushes. Adv. Mater. 19, 3838–3843 (2007). [Google Scholar]
  25. Gao C. R. et al. Integrated oil separation and water purification by a double-layer TiO2-based mesh. Energy Environ. Sci. 6, 1147–1151 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  26. Decher G. Fuzzy nanoassemblies: toward layered polymeric multicomposites. Science 277, 1232–1237 (1997). [Google Scholar]
  27. Hammond P. T. Form and function in multilayer assembly: new applications at the nanoscale. Adv. Mater. 16, 1271–1293 (2004). [Google Scholar]
  28. Quinn J. F., Johnston A. P. R., Such G. K., Zelikin A. N. & Caruso F. Next generation, sequentially assembled ultrathin films: beyond electrostatics. Chem. Soc. Rev. 36, 707–718 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Zhang X., Chen H. & Zhang H. Y. Layer-by-layer assembly: from conventional to unconventional methods. Chem. Commun. 1395–1405 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Srivastava S. & Kotov N. A. Composite layer-by-layer (LBL) assembly with inorganic nanoparticles and nanowires. Acc. Chem. Res. 41, 1831–1841 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Lavalle P. et al. Dynamic aspects of films prepared by a sequential deposition of species: perspectives for smart and responsive materials. Adv. Mater. 23, 1191–1221 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Li Y., Wang X. & Sun J. Q. Layer-by-layer assembly for rapid fabrication of thick polymeric films. Chem. Soc. Rev. 41, 5998–6009 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Tong W. J., Song X. X. & Gao C. Y. Layer-by-layer assembly of microcapsules and their biomedical applications. Chem. Soc. Rev. 41, 6103–6124 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Decher G. & Schlenoff J. B. Multilayer thin films: sequential assembly of nanocomposite materials. Wiley-VCH Weinheim, Germany, Second Edition, (2012). [Google Scholar]
  35. Fujishima A. & Honda K. Electrochemical photolysis of water at a semiconductor electrode. Nature 238, 37–38 (1972). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Linsebigler A. L., Lu G. Q. & Yates J. T. Photocatalysis on TiO2 surfaces: principles, mechanisms, and selected results. Chem. Rev. 95, 735–758 (1995). [Google Scholar]
  37. Kamat P. V. Meeting the clean energy demand: nanostructure architectures for solar energy conversion. J. Phys. Chem. C 111, 2834–2860 (2007). [Google Scholar]
  38. Zhang L. B. et al. Drying and nondrying layer-by-layer assembly for the fabrication of sodium silicate/TiO2 nanoparticle composite films. Langmuir 28, 1816–1823 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Choi W., Termin A. & Hoffmann M. R. The role of metal ion dopants in quantum-sized TiO2: correlation between photoreactivity and charge carrier recombination dynamics. J. Phys. Chem. 98, 13669–13679 (1994). [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Information

srep02326-s1.pdf (962.6KB, pdf)
Supplementary Information

Movie S1

Download video file (430.9KB, mov)

Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES