Skip to main content
Oncology Reports logoLink to Oncology Reports
. 2013 Apr 23;30(1):131–138. doi: 10.3892/or.2013.2416

Estrogen receptor-β expression and pharmacological targeting in bladder cancer

ERIC C KAUFFMAN 1,2, BRIAN D ROBINSON 1,3, MARTIN DOWNES 4, KATARZYNA MARCINKIEWICZ 5, SRINIVAS VOURGANTI 6, DOUGLAS S SCHERR 1, LORRAINE J GUDAS 5,, NIGEL P MONGAN 3,4,
PMCID: PMC3729232  PMID: 23612777

Abstract

A role for estrogen signaling in urothelial carcinoma of the bladder (UCB) is suggested to be associated with more advanced disease with worse outcomes in women. Estrogen receptor β (ERβ) is the predominant receptor in bladder tissues. We aimed to ascertain whether ERβ correlates with clinicopathological predictors of aggressive bladder cancer and worse survival outcomes. ERβ was measured by immunohistochemistry in malignant and adjacent benign bladder tissues in patients (N=72) with UCB who underwent radical cystectomy. ERβ expression was tested for statistical association with clinicopathological variables and patient survival. ERβ expression was determined in bladder cancer cell lines, and the effects of the selective estrogen modulator tamoxifen and the ERβ agonist diarylpropionitrile on cell growth were determined. The ERβ level was significantly higher in malignant vs. benign urothelium (P<0.001) and was strongly associated with aggressive tumor histology characterized by lymphovascular (P=0.008) and perineural (P=0.006) invasion, and clinical histories of pelvic irradiation (P=0.005), hydronephrosis (P=0.022) and no intravesical chemotherapy (P=0.038). All patients with a high (>70%) percentage of ERβ positivity in tissue with >3-month follow-up developed recurrent disease (P=0.009). Higher ERβ level was predictive of worse recurrence-free and overall survival following cystectomy, after adjustment for tumor stage, and remained significantly associated with recurrence-free survival in the multivariable analysis including tumor stage, nodal stage and lymphovascular invasion. Activation of ERβ in bladder cancer cell lines led to significant increases in proliferation, while pharmacological inhibition with tamoxifen blocked cell growth. Our study supports a role for ERβ in aggressive UCB. Pharmacological targeting of ERβ warrants further investigation as a therapeutic strategy in UCB.

Keywords: epigenetic, hormonal, urothelial, transitional cell

Introduction

Urothelial carcinoma of the bladder (UCB) is the fourth and tenth most common solid malignancy among US men and women, respectively (1). Radical cystectomy achieves a durable cure in most patients with organ-confined, lymph node-negative muscle-invasive or high-risk non-muscle invasive tumors, but a third of patients recur (2,3). Worse oncologic outcomes are linked to surgical histopathology, including higher pT stage, lymphovascular invasion (LVI), lymph node metastasis and surgical margin involvement, as well as preoperative characteristics including female gender, hydronephrosis, pelvic radiation and lack of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (213). A role for hormonal factors in bladder carcinogenesis has been suggested by the male predominance (~3:1) of UCB diagnoses in industrialized nations independent of tobacco usage or occupational carcinogen exposure (3). Estrogen plays a role in bladder development and homeostasis (14) and has been implicated in more advanced stage bladder tumors and worse bladder cancer-specific survival among females (513,15). Epidemiologic support for a role of estrogen in bladder carcinogenesis includes a 50–60% increase in UCB diagnoses among females with early menopause, bilateral oophorectomy or absence of combined estrogen-progesterone hormonal replacement therapy (1618). A 2-fold increase in UCB incidence is also observed among nulliparous women, possibly related to unopposed estrogen (16).

The estrogen receptor genes, ERα and ERβ, have differential tissue expression patterns and functions (19). An important role for estrogen signaling is becoming apparent in UCB (2024). ERβ protein is the predominant ER in bladder, expressed in up to 77% of clinical UCB, whereas ERα expression is infrequent (<5%) (22,25,26). ERβ expression is unrelated to UCB patient gender or age, but has not been studied with regard to other clinical risk factors, such as smoking or radiation. Furthermore, the relationship between ERβ and tumor stage or patient outcomes is disputed (22,25,26), and the relationship of ERβ to histological cancer features such as perineural invasion, concomitant carcinoma in situ or LVI has not yet been described. While selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERM) have been shown to inhibit the proliferation of some UCB cell lines and murine xenografts, which ER isoform(s) is being targeted has not been addressed (2024). Research in preclinical models has generally not interrogated the ERβ isoform specifically, with most studies evaluating a non-specific ERα/ERβ agonist in UCB cell lines expressing both ERα and ERβ.

As ERβ is the predominant estrogen receptor isoform in normal and malignant bladder tissue, our study aimed to better delineate the role of ERβ in bladder carcinogenesis. We quantified ERβ expression in both malignant and benign tissues from UCB patients undergoing cystectomy and tested its association with tumor pathology, including for the first time histological features such as lymphovascular, perineural invasion and concomitant carcinoma in situ, in addition to survival outcomes. We also provide the first investigation of ERβ in relation to known clinical risk factors for UCB diagnosis and UCB-specific mortality including smoking history, race, pelvic radiation, hydronephrosis and neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Finally, we evaluated the effect of selective ERβ activation on UCB cell line proliferation with and without SERM treatment. Our findings indicate a crucial role for ERβ in UCB, including a novel stage-independent association with aggressive cancer histology and poor survival outcomes after cystectomy, and suggest clinical utility of ERβ pharmacologic targeting in this disease.

Materials and methods

Patients and tissue specimens

Institutional Review Board approval was acquired for this study. Tissue samples (N=129), including urothelial cell carcinomas (n=59) and benign urothelium (n=70), were obtained from May 2002 to December 2007 at the Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, New York Presbyterian Hospital, Weill Cornell Medical College as previously described (27). All patients had preoperatively diagnosed UCB and underwent pelvic lymphadenectomy during cystectomy. Thirteen patients with no detectable cancer (pT0) at surgery had only benign urothelium acquired. All but two patients without pT0 disease had both benign and malignant tissue samples obtained; the two remaining patients had large primary tumors such that only malignant tissue was available. Death certificates and autopsy reports were reviewed to determine cause of death as cancer-related or from other causes.

Immunohistochemistry

Immunohistochemical staining for human ERβ protein (14C8 antibody, 1:300 dilution; Novus Biologicals, Littleton, CO, USA) was performed using the Leica BOND-MAX Autostainer and the Leica Microsystems Refine Detection kit as previously described (27). Negative controls were performed without the primary antibody and with normal mouse serum. Benign and malignant prostate tissues were used as a positive control. All stained tissue sections were evaluated by a urologic pathologist (B.D.R.), and separate scores were assigned to each sample based on: i) the percentage of tissue staining positive (0–100%); and ii) intensity of positively staining cells (none, 0; weak, 1; moderate, 2; and strong, 3) as previously described (27). Only nuclear staining was considered positive, and a minimum of 100 tumor nuclei was evaluated per case.

Bladder cancer cell lines, culture conditions, RNA extraction and qRT-PCR

The HTB-1 (J82), HTB-5 (TCCSUP) and HT1376 UCB cell lines were derived from high-grade invasive urothelial carcinomas, and the HTB-3 (SCaBER) cell line was derived from an invasive squamous cell carcinoma of the bladder (ATCC, Rockville, MD, USA). RNA was extracted and cDNA was synthesized as previously described (27). Primers for ERα and ERβ were as previously described (22) and HPRT (5′-tgctcgagatgtgatgaagg-3′ and 5′-tcccctgttgactggtcatt-3′) was used as a normalizing control. cDNA from the MCF-7 breast cancer cell line was used as a positive control, and expression of ERα and ERβ was normalized by HPRT and compared to the levels detected in MCF-7 using the ΔΔCt qPCR method.

Effects of ER agonists and a selective ER modulator on bladder cancer cell growth

The effects of 17β-estradiol (E2)(Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) and selective ERβ agonist diarylpropionitrile (DPN) (Tocris, Minneapolis, MN, USA), with and without tamoxifen (Sigma Aldrich), were assessed on bladder cancer cell lines at a 10 nM concentration as previously reported (22,28). Cells (1×106/well) were treated with the drugs for 48 h and the number of cells was counted using a Coulter Counter (Beckman-Coulter, Brea, CA, USA). Each treatment condition represents a minimum of 12 data points accrued over 4 separate experiments.

Statistical analysis

Fisher’s exact test was used to test for statistical association between ERβ immunostaining scores and clinicopathological variables (Table I). The staining percentage was assessed as a categorical variable using a 4-tier scale (0–10%, 11–40%, 41–70% and 71–100%), while staining intensity was assessed using a 0–3 scale, as previously described (27). Patients with a final pathology of primary UCB in situ (pTis) were censored from the analysis testing for association with concomitant CIS. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to analyze disease-free, cancer-specific and overall survival curves stratified by ERβ immunostaining scores. Time to recurrence or death was compared between groups using a log-rank test. A multivariable Cox proportional hazards model tested the ability of immunostaining scores to predict survival outcomes after adjusting for pathologic tumor stage. A second Cox proportional hazards model was also constructed which included ERβ staining, pathologic tumor stage, LVI and lymph node stage. For in vitro growth assays, two-tailed t-tests were utilized to compare the effects on cellular proliferation of individual drug treatments relative to solvent control and between drug combinations. Statistical analyses were conducted using IBM SPSS Statistics (version 19.0.1.80), Prism (GraphPad Software Inc., La Jolla, CA, USA) or JMP version 8 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA). In all cases, P≤0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant result.

Table I.

Characteristics of the cystectomy patients.

Characteristics
Total patients, n (%) 72 (100)
Age (years)
 Mean ± SD 66.4±10.0
 Median 66.6
 Range 43.3–88.8
Gender, n (%)
 Female 21 (29)
 Male 51 (71)
Race, n (%)
 Caucasian 66 (92)
 Other 6 (8)
BMI, kg/m2
 Mean ± SD 26.8±4.8
 Median 26.5
Smoking history, n (%) 56 (74)
Active smoker, n (%) 15 (21)
Prior pelvic irradiation, n (%) 8 (11)
Prior intravesical chemotherapy, n (%) 21 (29)
Prior neoadjuvant systemic chemotherapy, n (%) 11 (15)
Pre-operative hydronephrosis, n (%) 20 (28)
Pathological stage, n (%)
 pT0 13 (18)
 pTa 9 (13)
 pTis 11 (15)
 pT1 7 (10)
 pT2 10 (15)
 pT3 11 (15)
 pT4 11 (15)
Lymph node metastases, n (%) 18 (25)
N-stage
 N1 10 (14)
 N2 5 (7)
 N3 3 (4)
Lymphovascular invasion (LVI), n (%) 15 (21)
Perineural invasion, n (%) 6 (8)
Concomitant carcinoma in situ (CIS), n (%) 34 (47)

Results

Association of ERβ immunostaining with bladder cancer histopathology and clinical risk factors

The majority of cases had only low (1+) intensity ERβ staining (Fig. 1). Staining positivity (percentage of tissue) was significantly elevated in cancer tissues compared to benign bladder tissues (P<0.001) (Fig. 1, Table II). For example, ~80% of cancer specimens had >10% tissue positivity, compared to a minority of benign specimens (Fig. 1). High tissue positivity (>70%) was observed exclusively in cancer specimens (Fig. 1). ERβ staining was not associated with tumor stage (Fig. 1), including different substage comparisons (Table II). However, ERβ positivity in cancer specimens was strongly associated with aggressive bladder cancer histological features, namely LVI and perineural invasion (P<0.01 each; Table II). All cancers with LVI had at least low (>10%) ERβ positivity, and all cancers with perineural invasion had at least moderate (>40%) ERβ positivity. The presence of LVI was also associated with ERβ positivity in the adjacent benign urothelium (Table II).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Immunohistochemical staining. Representative immunohistochemical staining for ERβ in (A) benign urothelium, (B) non-muscle invasive urothelial carcinoma (pTis, pTa, pT1), (C) muscle invasive carcinoma (pT2) and (D) extravesical (pT3) carcinoma. (All images were captured at ×400 total magnification; bar, 20 μm). (E and F) Distribution of staining positivity and intensity according to pathological stage. Separate scores were assigned to the stained tissue sections based on (E) the intensity of positively staining cells (0, none; 1, weak; 2, moderate; and 3, strong) and on (F) tissue positivity, i.e., the percentage of tissue staining positive (0–100%). Only nuclear staining was considered positive, and a minimum of 100 tumor nuclei were counted for each case. Please refer to Table II for detailed statistical analysis.

Table II.

Association of ERβ with patient histopathological traits, disease recurrence and cancer-specific mortality in tumor specimens.

Tumor (n=59) Benign urothelium (n=70)


Histopathological parameters ERβ positivity % ERβ intensity ERβ positivity % ERβ intensity
Stage (overall) 0.448 0.326 0.499 0.694
 Non-muscle invasive vs. invasive 0.197 0.290 0.540 0.288
 NMI vs. MI 0.218 0.149 0.425 0.493
 BC vs. EVE 0.249 0.457 0.105 0.043
Lymphovascular invasion 0.008 0.389 0.033 0.317
Perineural invasion 0.006 1 0.493 1
Comcomitant carcinoma in situ 0.230 0.323 0.628 0.823
Positive bladder margin 0.769 1 0.841 1

Fisher’s exact P-values are shown for each statistical association. Bold print indicates significance (P<0.05). Non-muscle invasive (Ta, T1 and CIS) and muscle invasive (T2, T3 and T4) bladder cancers. NMI, non-muscle invasive; MI, muscle invasive; BC, bladder confined; EVE, extravesical.

ERβ levels were also tested for association with clinical variables, including risk factors for UCB diagnosis or UCB-specific mortality (Table III). ERβ positivity in cancer specimens was associated with prior pelvic radiation and hydronephrosis (Table III), with >70% positivity found in ~50 and ~33% of cancer specimens with these traits, respectively. ERβ positivity was inversely associated with a history of intravesical chemotherapy, with minimal or low staining in the vast majority (82%) of cancer specimens from these patients. ERβ positivity was associated with race in benign specimens.

Table III.

Association of ERβ with patient clinicopathological traits, disease recurrence and cancer-specific mortality in tumor specimens.

Tumor (n=59) Non-tumor (n=70)


Clinical parameters ERβ % positivity ERβ intensity ERβ % positivity ERβ intensity
Age (years) 0.283 0.630 0.156 0.373
Gender 0.791 1 0.952 0.199
Race 0.183 0.801 0.018 0.398
Smoking
 Any history 0.399 0.819 0.813 1
 Active 0.478 1 0.441 1
Body mass index 0.198 0.928 0.139 0.677
Prior pelvic radiation 0.005 0.310 0.418 0.771
Hydronephrosis 0.022 0.122 0.393 1
Intravesical chemotherapy 0.038 0.194 0.083 0.330
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy 0.292 0.462 0.701 0.385

Fisher’s exact P-values are shown for each statistical association. Bold print indicates significance (P<0.05).

Association of ERβ immunostaining with bladder cancer patient survival outcomes

Median and mean patient follow-up after radical cystectomy was 21 and 26 months, respectively. Recurrence occurred in 21/72 (29%) patients, 15/72 (21%) died from their disease, and an additional 10/72 (14%) patients died of other causes. All patients with a high (>70%) percentage of ERβ positivity in tissue at >3-month follow-up developed recurrent disease. Tumor stage, lymph node stage (P=−0.0001), LVI (P=0.03) and elevated ERβ positivity (P=0.009) were significantly inversely associated with recurrence-free, cancer-specific and overall survival in the Cox univariable analysis (Table IV). Each of these variables also correlated with shorter time to recurrence, cancer-specific or all-cause mortality on log-rank tests, as depicted for ERβ in Fig. 2. No association between ERβ intensity in cancer specimens and time to recurrence, cancer-specific or all-cause mortality was observed (P=0.59, 0.32, 0.54, respectively). There was also no association between ERβ intensity or positivity in adjacent benign urothelium and time to recurrence, cancer-specific or all-cause mortality (P=0.62, 0.08, 0.28 and 0.28, 0.07, 0.18, respectively).

Table IV.

Multivariable associations of survival outcomes.

Univariate analysis Multivariable analysis 1 Multivariable analysis 2



(P-value) pT stage (P-value) pT stage, N stage and LVI (P-value)
Recurrence-free survival
 Percentage of ERβ positivity in tissue 0.0090 0.029 0.017
 pT stage <0.0001 <0.0001 0.0004
 N stage 0.0001 - 0.14
 Lymphovascular invasion 0.030 - 0.91
Cancer-specific survival
 Percentage of ERβ positivity in tissue 0.0014 0.11 0.26
 pT stage <0.0001 0.016 0.071
 N stage 0.0012 - 0.83
 Lymphovascular invasion 0.0017 - 0.89
Overall survival
 Percentage of ERβ positivity in tissue 0.0061 0.041 0.067
 pT stage <0.0001 <0.0001 0.017
 N stage 0.0003 - 0.58
 Lymphovascular invasion <0.0001 - 0.035

Multivariable analysis 1 includes ERβ percentage and pT stage. Multivariable analysis 2 includes ERβ percentage, pT stage, N stage and lymphovascular invasion (LVI).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Kaplan-Meier survival estimates. Kaplan-Meier estimates stratified by percentage of ERβ positivity in tissue (square, 0–10%; open circle, 11–40%; black circle, 41–70%; star, 71–100%) for (A) recurrence-free survival (RFS) (P=0.030), (B) cancer-specific survival (CSS) (P=0.0018), and (C) overall survival (P=0.0061).

In Cox multivariable analysis including ERβ positivity and tumor stage, both variables remained significantly inversely associated with recurrence-free and overall survival; tumor stage (P=0.02) but not ERβ (P=0.07) remained significantly associated with cancer-specific survival, likely because of the limited number of cancer-specific death events. A second multivariable analysis of survival outcomes was performed with ERβ positivity, tumor stage, lymph node stage and LVI. In this second analysis, increased ERβ positivity still remained significantly inversely associated with recurrence-free survival (P=0.02) independent of these variables (Table IV).

Effects of ERβ activation and selective ER modulation on bladder cancer cell growth

ERα and ERβ mRNA expression was evaluated in the HTB-1 (J82), HTB-3 (SCaBER), HTB-5 (TCC-SUP) and HT1376 (CRL-1472) bladder cancer cell lines. All four cell lines expressed transcripts for ERβ but not ERα as compared to the MCF-7 breast cancer cell line (Fig. 3A and B). Treatment with estradiol resulted in a significant increase in HTB-1, HTB-3 and HTB-5 proliferation, whereas the selective ER modulator and ERβ antagonist tamoxifen inhibited proliferation of HTB-1 and HT1376 cells, the two cell lines with the highest ERβ expression (Fig. 3B). The ERβ-selective agonist DPN induced a significant increase in proliferation in all three UCB cell lines tested (Fig. 3C, E and F) relative to the control treated cells. DPN did not affect proliferation of the squamous HTB-3 cell line (Fig. 3D), which exhibited the lowest ERβ expression (Fig. 3B). DPN-induced cellular proliferation was inhibited by tamoxifen in all cell lines (Fig. 3). These results indicate that hormonal activation of ERβ promotes UCB cell proliferation and that this can be blocked by tamoxifen.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Expression of ERα and ERβ in human bladder cancer cell lines and effects of estrogenic agonists and antagonists on bladder cancer cell proliferation. mRNA expression of (A) ERα and (B) ERβ in bladder cancer cell lines normalized to the expression in MCF7 breast cancer cells. Comparison of the effects of β-estradiol and the ERβ-selective agonist (DPN), in the presence and absence of tamoxifen (TAM) on the proliferation of (C) HTB-1, (D) HTB-3, (E) HTB-5 and (F) HT1376 bladder cancer cells. Statistical significance is indicated relative to control treated cells, except where indicated by bars between treatment groups. (*P<0.05, **P<0.01, ***P<0.001; ns, not significant).

Discussion

Identification of the molecular mechanisms governing bladder carcinogenesis is critical for the development of novel pharmacotherapies and biomarkers for this disease. Despite clinical observations of more advanced UCB and shorter survival among female patients, in addition to an established role for ERβ in bladder development and function (14), controversy remains over the contributions of estrogen signaling to bladder carcinogenesis (513,1518). ERβ has been implicated in endocrine-related human malignancies, notably invasive prostate cancers (19). Previous studies of ERα and ERβ expression in UCB specimens yielded inconsistent results (22,25,26,29,30) and have been limited to a subset of available UCB preclinical models (22,28,29).

We sought to clarify these findings by examining ERβ in a well-described UCB patient cohort (27) and additional bladder cancer cell lines. Among the UCB patients, we found no association between ERβ and tumor stage, but uncovered a novel association between elevated ERβ and aggressive bladder histology characterized by perineural invasion and LVI, the latter being a well-established independent predictor of worse oncologic outcomes. In addition, our findings demonstrated that elevated ERβ predicts reduced survival among cystectomy patients with all UCB stages, and provide the first demonstration that this association is independent of tumor stage. ERβ expression remained significantly associated with recurrence-free survival after adjusting for other established independent predictors of cystectomy patient outcomes, including lymph node stage and LVI. We thus identified ERβ as an independent biomarker for poor cystectomy patient outcome, suggesting a model in which estrogen signaling promotes aggressive UCB histology. We additionally found an association between LVI and higher ERβ levels in the adjacent benign urothelium, raising the possibility of paracrine signaling effects in promoting this aggressive UCB histology. We also investigated for the first time the association between ERβ expression and clinical risk factors for UCB diagnosis and/or cancer-specific death. We identify a significant association between elevated ERβ and preoperative hydronephrosis and prior pelvic radiation, both linked to aggressive bladder cancers, suggesting a potential role for ERβ in these processes. Finally, we noted lower ERβ levels in patients who had prior intravesical chemotherapy, consistent with a role of ERβ in promoting cell cycle progression.

To corroborate our patient findings, we determined the effect of ERβ activation on the in vitro proliferation of a panel of bladder cancer cell lines. Shen and colleagues (22) previously reported increased proliferation in the RT4 UCB cell line treated with the non-selective ER agonist estradiol; but higher expression of ERα than ERβ in this cell line raises the possibility that ERα activation was responsible. Another study investigating estradiol in a UCB cell line expressing predominantly ERβ observed no growth effects (31). Here, we demonstrated that selective ERβ activation by DPN in the bladder cancer cells predominantly expressing ERβ increased proliferation in all cases (Fig. 3C, E and F), whereas DPN had no positive effect on the proliferation of HTB-3 cells with low ERβ expression (Fig. 3D). These data provide mechanistic evidence that ERβ activation promotes UCB cell growth, although contrasting with a recent report from Han et al(29) where ERβ activation reduced UCB migration and invasion.

To explore ERβ as a therapeutic target, we measured the growth effects of the selective ER modulator (SERM), tamoxifen, in UCB cell lines, with or without simultaneous ERβ activation using DPN. Several prior studies of SERMs have described conflicting growth inhibitory effects in bladder cancer cell lines or murine xenografts (2123,31). We found that tamoxifen treatment alone significantly inhibited growth (Fig. 3C and F) of the two cell lines (HTB-1 and HT1376) with high ERβ expression (Fig. 3B). Tamoxifen also significantly inhibited the proliferative effects of DPN in all 4 bladder cancer cell lines (Fig. 3C-F) when the two treatments were combined, supporting the therapeutic efficacy of selective ER modulators in bladder cancer.

In conclusion, we demonstrated ERβ upregulation in UCB compared to benign urothelium, consistent with an oncogenic function. Furthermore, we uncovered a stage-independent association between ERβ levels and: i) aggressive UCB histology and ii) clinical traits carrying a poor prognosis. We provide the first demonstration of ERβ as an independent predictor of poor cystectomy patient outcomes after adjustment for tumor stage, lymph node involvement and LVI. We demonstrated that ERβ activation increases UCB cell proliferation but can be effectively blocked by SERM pharmacotherapy. Although the relationship between ERβ and tumor stage and patient outcomes is disputed (22,25,26), our research supports a role for ERβ in promoting aggressive bladder cancer and suggests that pharmacological targeting of estrogen signaling pathways may be useful in treating this disease.

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge the institutional financial support of Weill Cornell Medical College, the University of Nottingham and an F31 Fellowship from NIH (NIDCR) (K.M.).

References

  • 1.Siegel R, Naishadham D, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin. 2012;62:10–29. doi: 10.3322/caac.20138. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Stein JP, Lieskovsky G, Cote R, et al. Radical cystectomy in the treatment of invasive bladder cancer: long-term results in 1,054 patients. J Clin Oncol. 2001;19:666–675. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2001.19.3.666. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Messing E. Urothelial tumors of the bladder. In: Wein AJ, editor. Campbell-Walsh Urology. 9th edition. Saunders Elsevier; Philadelphia: 2007. pp. 2407–2446. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Shariat SF, Karakiewicz PI, Palapattu GS, et al. Outcomes of radical cystectomy for transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder: a contemporary series from the Bladder Cancer Research Consortium. J Urol. 2006;176:2414–2422. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2006.08.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Madeb R, Messing EM. Gender, racial and age differences in bladder cancer incidence and mortality. Urol Oncol. 2004;22:86–92. doi: 10.1016/S1078-1439(03)00139-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Tilki D, Svatek RS, Karakiewicz PI, et al. Characteristics and outcomes of patients with pT4 urothelial carcinoma at radical cystectomy: a retrospective international study of 583 patients. J Urol. 2010;183:87–93. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.08.145. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.May M, Bastian PJ, Brookman-May S, et al. Gender-specific differences in cancer-specific survival after radical cystectomy for patients with urothelial carcinoma of the urinary bladder in pathologic tumor stage T4a. Urol Oncol. 2011 Nov 4; doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2011.09.011. (Epub ahead of print) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Palou J, Sylvester RJ, Faba OR, et al. Female gender and carcinoma in situ in the prostatic urethra are prognostic factors for recurrence, progression, and disease-specific mortality in T1G3 bladder cancer patients treated with bacillus Calmette-Guérin. Eur Urol. 2012;62:118–125. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2011.10.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Scosyrev E, Noyes K, Feng C, Messing E. Sex and racial differences in bladder cancer presentation and mortality in the US. Cancer. 2009;115:68–74. doi: 10.1002/cncr.23986. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Shariat SF, Chromecki TF, Cha EK, et al. Risk stratification of organ-confined bladder cancer after radical cystectomy using cell cycle-related biomarkers. J Urol. 2012;187:457–462. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2011.10.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Tilki D, Reich O, Svatek RS, et al. Characteristics and outcomes of patients with clinical carcinoma in situ only treated with radical cystectomy: an international study of 243 patients. J Urol. 2010;183:1757–1763. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2010.01.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Tilki D, Svatek RS, Novara G, et al. Stage pT0 at radical cystectomy confers improved survival: an international study of 4,430 patients. J Urol. 2010;184:888–894. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2010.04.081. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.van Rhijn BW, van der Kwast TH, Alkhateeb SS, et al. A new and highly prognostic system to discern T1 bladder cancer substage. Eur Urol. 2012;61:378–384. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2011.10.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Imamov O, Yakimchuk K, Morani A, et al. Estrogen receptor beta-deficient female mice develop a bladder phenotype resembling human interstitial cystitis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2007;104:9806–9809. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0703410104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.May M, Stief C, Brookman-May S, et al. Gender-dependent cancer-specific survival following radical cystectomy. World J Urol. 2011;30:707–713. doi: 10.1007/s00345-011-0773-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Davis-Dao CA, Henderson KD, Sullivan-Halley J, et al. Lower risk in parous women suggests that hormonal factors are important in bladder cancer etiology. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2011;20:1156–1170. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-11-0017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.McGrath M, Michaud DS, De Vivo I. Hormonal and reproductive factors and the risk of bladder cancer in women. Am J Epidemiol. 2006;163:236–244. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwj028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Prizment AE, Anderson KE, Harlow BL, Folsom AR. Reproductive risk factors for incident bladder cancer: Iowa Women’s Health Study. Int J Cancer. 2007;120:1093–1098. doi: 10.1002/ijc.22418. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Thomas C, Gustafsson JA. The different roles of ER subtypes in cancer biology and therapy. Nat Rev Cancer. 2011;11:597–608. doi: 10.1038/nrc3093. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Kim HT, Kim BC, Kim IY, et al. Raloxifene, a mixed estrogen agonist/antagonist, induces apoptosis through cleavage of BAD in TSU-PR1 human cancer cells. J Biol Chem. 2002;277:32510–32515. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M202852200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Pu YS, Hsieh TS, Cheng AL, et al. Combined cytotoxic effects of tamoxifen and chemotherapeutic agents on bladder cancer cells: a potential use in intravesical chemotherapy. Br J Urol. 1996;77:76–85. doi: 10.1046/j.1464-410x.1996.82712.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Shen SS, Smith CL, Hsieh JT, et al. Expression of estrogen receptors-α and -β in bladder cancer cell lines and human bladder tumor tissue. Cancer. 2006;106:2610–2616. doi: 10.1002/cncr.21945. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Sonpavde G, Okuno N, Weiss H, et al. Efficacy of selective estrogen receptor modulators in nude mice bearing human transitional cell carcinoma. Urology. 2007;69:1221–1226. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2007.02.041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Kontos S, Papatsoris A, Kominea A, et al. Expression of ERβ and its co-regulators p300 and NCoR in human transitional cell bladder cancer. Urol Int. 2011;87:151–158. doi: 10.1159/000324262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Kontos S, Kominea A, Melachrinou M, Balampani E, Sotiropoulou-Bonikou G. Inverse expression of estrogen receptor-β and nuclear factor-κB in urinary bladder carcinogenesis. Int J Urol. 2010;17:801–809. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2042.2010.02603.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Tuygun C, Kankaya D, Imamoglu A, et al. Sex-specific hormone receptors in urothelial carcinomas of the human urinary bladder: a comparative analysis of clinicopathological features and survival outcomes according to receptor expression. Urol Oncol. 2011;29:43–51. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2009.01.033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Kauffman EC, Robinson BD, Downes MJ, et al. Role of androgen receptor and associated lysine-demethylase coregulators, LSD1 and JMJD2A, in localized and advanced human bladder cancer. Mol Carcinog. 2011;50:931–944. doi: 10.1002/mc.20758. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Teng J, Wang ZY, Jarrard DF, Bjorling DE. Roles of estrogen receptor α and β in modulating urothelial cell proliferation. Endocr Relat Cancer. 2008;15:351–364. doi: 10.1677/erc.1.01255. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Han B, Cui D, Jing Y, Hong Y, Xia S. Estrogen receptor β (ERβ ) is a novel prognostic marker of recurrence survival in non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer potentially by inhibiting cadherin switch. World J Urol. 2012;30:861–867. doi: 10.1007/s00345-011-0819-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Miyamoto H, Yao JL, Chaux A, et al. Expression of androgen and oestrogen receptors and its prognostic significance in urothelial neoplasm of the urinary bladder. BJU Int. 2012;109:1716–1726. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10706.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Waliszewski P, Waliszewska MK, Hemstreet GP, III, Hurst RE. Expression of sex steroid receptor genes and comodulation with retinoid signaling in normal human uroepithelial cells and bladder cancer cell lines. Urol Oncol. 1997;3:141–147. doi: 10.1016/s1078-1439(98)00011-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Oncology Reports are provided here courtesy of Spandidos Publications

RESOURCES