Skip to main content
Translational Oncology logoLink to Translational Oncology
. 2013 Aug 1;6(4):504–510. doi: 10.1593/tlo.13391

Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Exon 20 Mutation Increased in Post-Chemotherapy Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Detected with Patients' Blood Samples1

Ying Wang *, Wenlong Bao , Hua Shi , Chuming Jiang , Yongjun Zhang †,
PMCID: PMC3730025  PMID: 23908693

Abstract

PURPOSE: Patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutations have excellent response to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), and exon 20 mutation accounts for most of TKI drug resistance. Nested polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was used to detect EGFR exon 20 mutations of patients with NSCLC after chemotherapy. The same is being analyzed with patients' characteristics. METHODS: Peripheral blood samples were collected from 273 patients with NSCLC, including 143 with adenocarcinoma (ADC) and 130 with squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), after chemotherapy. DNA was extracted from whole blood for nested PCR amplification and purification. Sequencing was carried out in an automated 3730 sequencer, followed by analysis of EGFR exon 20 mutations from nested PCR products. RESULTS: The mutations of EGFR exon 20 were mainly point mutations in rs1050171 (c.2361A>G) and rs56183713 (c.2457G>A). The point mutation was 28.21%, 28.46%, and 27.97% in patients with NSCLC, ADC and SCC, respectively. Men had an equivalent mutation (27.18%) to women (30.77%). The mutation in smokers and nonsmokers was 27.68% and 29.17%, respectively. In unselected patients, there was no correlation between EGFR exon 20 mutations and patients' characteristics of age, gender, smoking history, histologic type, or tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) staging system. In subgroup analyses, the EGFR mutation of patients with SCC was correlated with TNM stage [P = .013; odds ratio = 1.758; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.125–2.747]. CONCLUSIONS: The data indicate that the chemotherapy may induce EGFR-TKI-resistant mutation in NSCLC cells and EGFR-TKI should be used in the early stage of NSCLC but not after chemotherapy.

Introduction

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer death in the United States [1] and China [2]. Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the most common histologic type, which affects approximately 80% to 85% of all patients with lung cancer. Although much progress has been made in the last 10 years for lung cancer (e.g., screening, minimally invasive techniques for diagnosis and treatment, and targeted therapy) [3], only 15.9% of all lung cancer patients can be alive for 5 years or longer after diagnosis [4]. Because more than 70% of patients with lung cancer are diagnosed with advanced-stage disease, systemic treatment plays main role in clinical management. However, routine platinum-based chemotherapy prolongs median survival time by only a few months in these patients compared with supportive care. Currently, median survival time is about 8 to 18 months for patients with metastatic and locally advanced diseases, respectively [5].

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is a transmembrane receptor that is detectable in approximately 80% to 85% of patients with NSCLC, and the level of expression varies widely on a continual scale. The activation of EGFR pathways results in the initiation of cancer proliferation, increased metastasis potential, and neoangiogenesis.

In recent years, selective EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) has emerged as an alternative treatment option for advanced NSCLC. Both erlotinib and gefitinib have demonstrated clinical efficacy in the second- or third-line treatment of NSCLC, especially among never smokers, females, East Asians, and adenocarcinoma (ADC) cell type [6–9]. However, despite the fact that the majority of patients with EGFR mutations benefited from these drugs, in excess of 20% of patients experienced resistance and all tumors ultimately developed resistance following initial response [10]. This is because EGFR mutations are more common in patients who are Asian, female, nonsmokers, and have ADC [11–15], all mentioned characteristics being linked to the known clinical predictors of gefitinib sensitivity [16–19].

Inhibition of EGFR kinase activities by EGFR-TKI, such as gefitinib and erlotinib, results in effective treatment for patients with NSCLC [6,20,21]. The IRESSA Pan-Asia Study clinical trial in Asia and randomized controlled studies on advanced NSCLC have confirmed EGFR-activating mutations as the main predictor of clinical outcome with TKI therapy [7,22,23]. The most commonly EGFR-activating mutations were in exon 19 (Del19) and exon 21 (L858R) that were found in approximately 10% of Caucasian patients with NSCLC and up to 50% of Asian patients [24].

Other drug-sensitive mutations include point mutations at exon 21 and exon 18 [25]. The pretreatment EGFR T790M mutation was associated with shorter progression-free survival (PFS) compared to EGFR-TKI therapy in patients with NSCLC [26]. The mutation play an important role in predicting PFS in patients with NSCLC and EGFR-activating mutation treated with TKI [27]. The prevalence of reported de novo T790M varied from 1% to 38% [27–30]. Han et al.

[31] found that EGFR mutations were detected in 39.4% (13/33) and 54.5% (18/33) of the serum samples of pre-chemotherapy and post-chemotherapy, respectively. Data show that PFS is improved with use of EGFR-TKI in patients with EGFR mutations when compared with standard chemotherapy, although overall survival is not statistically different [32].

Primary resistance to TKI therapy is associated with mutation at exon 20 [33–35]. However, the role of EGFR exon 20 mutations in lung cancer progression, especially when it is present before TKI treatment, is still being debated and lacks systematic exploration.

In mainland China, “adenocarcinoma” and “nonsmoker” were independent predictors for EGFR mutations in exons 18, 19, and 21 [36], while the correlation between EGFR exon 20 mutations and patients' characteristics remains unclear. The purpose of this study is to detect the relationship between EGFR exon 20 mutations and patients' characteristics in mainland China.

Patient and Methods

Patient Population

To be eligible for the study, patients were required to have pathologically confirmed stage NSCLC [either ADC or squamous cell carcinoma (SCC)], Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 to 2, and available plasma. Only patients treated at the Zhejiang Cancer Hospital from May 2012 to December 2012 were enrolled. Exclusion criteria included history of previous primary cancer other than lung cancer and independent of other lung-related disease, justifying this to avoid any probable interference from overlapping genes. All subjects provided their informed consent, and the study was approved by the ethics committee of Zhejiang Cancer Hospital.

DNA Preparation and Sequencing

DNA was isolated from whole blood by using the AxyPrep Blood Genomic DNA Miniprep Kit (Axygen Biosciences, Union City, CA). Atwo-step “boost/nest” polymerase chain reaction (PCR) strategy was employed where the boost reaction generated a larger fragment used as a template for the nest reaction. The nest products were bidirectionally sequenced on ABI 3730 XL sequencers (ABI Company, Oyster Bay, NY) with ABI BigDye Terminator v3.1 chemistry. Base calling was performed by the Agent system (Paracel, Alameda, CA). Sequence tracings were visually inspected to confirm accurate variant detection by the base-calling software. Coding variants were confirmed on repeat PCRs to exclude PCR artifacts. GenBank NM_201283 was used as the reference cDNA for nucleotide positions.

Nested PCR Amplification and Purification

Primer sequences for EGFR exon 20-nested PCR and extension were designed by using the Assay Designers Software version 3.0 (Sequenom, San Diego, CA) and were processed following standard protocols for iPLEX chemistry. Primers were synthesized by Sangon Biotech (Shanghai, China). Primer sequences for boost PCR (502 bp) were forward 5′-TGACTCCGACTCCTCCTTTA-3′ and reverse 5′ATCTCCCTTCCCTGATTAC-3′. Primer sequences for nest PCR (365 bp) were forward 5′-GTCCCTGTGCTAGGTCTTTT-3′ and reverse 5′-ATCTCCCTTCCCTGAT-TAC-3′. The first PCR assays were carried out in a 50-µl volume that contained 1 µl of extracted DNA, 1 µl of primers (R1 and F1), and 0.5 µl of Taq DNA polymerase. DNA was amplified for 35 cycles at 95°C for 3 minutes, 94°C for 30 seconds, 55 to 60°C for 35 seconds, 72°C for 40 to 50 seconds, followed by a 5- to 8-minute repaired extension at 72°C. The second PCRs were carried out in a 25-µl volume, including 2 µl of DNA from the first PCR products, 0.3 µl of primers (R1 and F1), and 0.3 µl of Taq DNA polymerase. DNA was amplified at 95°C for 5 minutes, the next 35 cycles at 95°C for 30 seconds, 55°C for 35 seconds, 72°C for 30 seconds, followed by a 10-minute extension at 72°C. Nested PCR products were electrophoresed in 1% agarose gel. Only PCR products with a positive band were purified using PCR Product Purification Kit (SanPrep, SK1141).

Sequencing Analysis

Before sequencing, PCR sequencing reaction for PCR products was used by BigDye Terminator v1.1 Kit (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) and performed in the light of the kit's request. All PCR assays were carried out in a 20-µl volume, including 1 µl of purified PCR products, 8 µl of BigDye (2.5x), and 1 µl of primers (3.2 pmol/µl). PCR sequencing reaction was performed at 96°C for 1 minute, then followed by 25 cycles at 96°C for 10 seconds, 50°C for 5 seconds, and 60°C for 4 minutes. Sequencing was carried out in an ABI 3730 Genetic Analyzer (Applied Biosystems). All sequence variants were confirmed by sequencing the products of independent PCR amplifications.

Statistical Analysis

We used the χ2 to assess the relationship between EGFR exon 20 mutations and each of the clinical and pathologic parameters. The relationship between EGFR exon 20 mutations and demographic characteristics was analyzed by logistic regression. The statistical analysis was performed using SPSS v13.0. All P values were two-sided, and P < .05 was considered significant.

Results

Patients' Characteristics

A total of 300 patients met the enrollment criteria and were enrolled in the study. The patients consisted of 217 men and 83 women, all of which accepted one to four cycles of platinum-based combined chemotherapy. There were 155 patients with lung ADC and 145 with SCC. A total of 197 patients were smokers and 103 were nonsmokers. The patients' clinical and disease characteristics are listed in Table 1. DNA was not available for 27 patients (20 males and 7 females), and 273 patients remained in the analysis list.

Table 1.

Patients' Clinical and Disease Characteristics.

Variables No. of Patients (N = 300) Percentage of Patients
Age, years
Mean 58.20 -
SD 9.52 -
Sex
Male 217 72.33
Female 83 27.67
Smoking history
Smokers 199 66.33
Nonsmoker 101 33.67
Histologic type
ADC 155 51.67
SCC 145 48.33
Disease stage
I 15 5.00
II 23 7.67
III 100 33.33
IV 162 54.00

Relationship between EGFR Mutations and Patients' Characteristics

The EGFR exon 20 wild-type DNA sequence was GAAGCC-TACGTGATGGC-CAGCGTGGACAACCCCCACG-TGTGCCGCCTGCTGGGCATCTGCCTCACCT-CCACCGTGCAGCTCATCACGCAGCTCATGC-CCTTCGGCTGCCTCCTGGAC-TATGTCCGGGAACACAA-AGACAATATTGGCTCCCAGTACCTGCTCAACTG-GTGTGTGCAGATCGCAAAG (189 bp; Figure 1).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

EGFR exon 20 wild-type DNA sequence.

The mutations of EGFR exon 20 were mainly point mutations in rs1050171 (c.2361A>G) and rs56183713 (c.2457G>A; Figure 2). The results showed that the EGFR mutation was 28.21%, 28.46%, and 27.97% in patients with NSCLC, ADC, and SCC, respectively. Men had an equivalent mutation (27.18%) to women (30.77%). The mutation in smokers and nonsmokers was 27.68% and 29.17%, respectively. Differences between ADC and SCC, men and women, and smokers and nonsmokers did not reach statistical significance (Table 2).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Mutations of EGFR exon 20 rs1050171 and rs56183713.

Table 2.

Association between EGFR Exon 20 Mutations and Clinicopathologic Parameters.

Item No. of Patients with Mutation No. of Patients without Mutation
Age, years
±60 44 119
>60 33 77
P .58
Sex
Male 53 142
Female 24 54
P .55
Smoking history
Smoker 49 128
Nonsmoker 28 68
P .79
Histologic type
ADC 40 103
SCC 37 93
P .93
Disease stage
I 5 9
P .52
II 7 9
P .15
III 22 70
P .26
IV 43 108
P .91

Multivariate analysis was performed to analyze correlation between EGFR mutation and patients' variables. The dependent variable was EGFR status (mutant and wild type). The covariates included age (years), gender (male and female), histology type (ADC and SCC), smoking history (smoker and nonsmoker), and tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) stage (I, II, III, and IV). There was no correlation between the five variables and EGFR mutation (Table 3).

Table 3.

Association between EGFR Exon 20 Mutations and Clinical Features in Patients with NSCLC.

Parameter P Multivariate Analysis

OR 95% CI
Age .77 0.92 0.54–1.58
Sex .29 1.76 0.61–5.13
Smoking history .46 0.67 0.24–1.92
Histologic type .69 1.13 0.61–2.12
Disease stage .45 1.14 0.81–1.62

For its part, in subgroup analysis, multivariate analysis was used to identify the correlation. In patients with SCC, the EGFR mutation was correlated with TNM stage [P = .013; odds ratio (OR) = 1.758; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.125–2.747], but the three variables (age, gender, and smoking history) were not correlated with EGFR mutation (Table 4). In an almost equal way, in patients with ADC the EGFR mutations were not correlated with age, gender, smoking history, or TNM stage (Table 5).

Table 4.

Association between EGFR Exon 20 Mutations and Clinical Features in Patients with SCC.

Parameter P Multivariate Analysis

OR 95% CI
Age .82 0.92 0.43–1.96
Sex 1 - -
Smoking history 1 - -
Disease stage .01 1.76 1.12–2.75

Table 5.

Association between EGFR Exon 20 Mutations and Clinical Features in Patients with ADC.

Parameter P Multivariate Analysis

OR 95% CI
Age .73 1.15 0.53–2.47
Sex .22 0.49 0.16–1.53
Smoking history .99 0.99 0.32–3.07
Disease stage .40 0.81 0.49–1.34

Discussion

It has been confirmed that EGFR-activating mutations represents the main predictor of clinical outcome with TKI therapy [7,22,23]. According to Hirsch and Bunn [24], the most commonly EGFR-activating mutations are in exon 19 (Del19) and exon 21 (L858R). Additionally, Riely et al. [25] indicated that other drug-sensitive mutations include point mutations at exon 21 and exon 18. Primary resistance to TKI therapy is associated with mutation at exon 20 [33–35]. However, the role of EGFR exon 20 mutations in lung cancer progression, especially its presence before TKI treatment, is still being debated and lacks systematic exploration.

In this study, we found, in unselected patients with NSCLC treated with platinum-based combined chemotherapy, that the EGFR exon 20 mutation was 28.21%, the same being 28.46% and 27.97% in ADC and SCC, respectively. We failed to find the correlation between EGFR exon 20 mutations and patients' characteristics of age, gender, smoking history, histologic type, or TNM stage. This may be ascribed to the greatly increased EGFR-TKI-resistant mutation post-chemotherapy, thus leading to the reduction of therapeutic effect of EGFR-TKI. Therefore, if EGFR-TKI is used in NSCLC early stage, the benefits that patients get from the drug will be maximized. Recent data also suggest that erlotinib should be used as first-line systemic therapy in patients with EGFR mutations documented before the mentioned therapy [32,37–39]. Strikingly, we also found that the patients with SCC had a higher TNM stage and more mutation (P = .013) in subgroup analysis. These data indicated that the chemotherapy may induce NSCLC cells to restrain EGFR-TKI. Thus, the higher the TNM stage, the greater the resistance. These results suggest that the EGFR-TKI should be used in the early stage of NSCLC but not after chemotherapy.

It is also possible that mutation can be present before treatment and mutation tumor cells may undergo a relatively indolent progression in tumorigenesis [40–42]. De novo mutation might contribute to poor survival besides the drug resistance [27].

Initially, EGFR exon 20 mutations were found in specimens of NSCLC patients with EGFR-TKI treatment failure and currently in untreated specimens. It is likely that primary tumor samples of patients with NSCLC have significant de novo EGFR exon 20 mutation and de novo TKI-resistant cells before TKI therapy. These TKI-resistant clones grow in the selective environment of TKI therapy because of their survival advantage [26]. Similarly, chemotherapy can kill TKI-sensitive NSCLC cells, while TKI-resistant cells can still grow.

It was reported that the specimens to detect EGFR mutation can be derived from tissue, blood, and pleural fluid. Nevertheless, sequence analysis of tumor DNA from tissue is still the most widely applied method for detecting EGFR mutation and is considered the most direct and reliable approach. In this study, we used peripheral blood to detect EGFR exon 20 mutations. In the future, it is necessary to detect EGFR mutations in both tissue and blood.

In conclusion, our data suggested that the platinum-based chemotherapy in this study can induce EGFR-TKI-resistant mutation in NSCLC cells at EGFR exon 20 and that EGFR-TKI should be used in the early stage of NSCLC but not after chemotherapy.

Acknowledgments

We thank Hailong Liu for his excellent technical support.

Footnotes

1

Funded by Zhejiang Provincial Traditional Chinese Medicine Foundation for Outstanding Young Talent (No. 2012ZQ005). Conflict of interest statement: None declared.

References

  • 1.Siegel R, Naishadham D, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2013. CA Cancer J Clin. 2013;63(1):11–30. doi: 10.3322/caac.21166. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.National Cancer Center, Disease Prevention and Control Bureau, Ministry of Health, author. Chinese Cancer Registry Annual Report (2012) Beijing, China: Chinese People's Liberation Army Military Medical Sciences Press; 2013. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Ettinger DS. Ten years of progress in non-small cell lung cancer. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2012;10(3):292–295. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2012.0029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Howlader N, Noone AM, Krapcho M, Neyman N, Aminou R, Waldron W, Altekruse SF, Kosary CL, Ruhl J, Tatalovich Z, et al., editors. SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975–2009 (Vintage 2009 Populations) Based on November 2011 SEER Data Submission. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute; [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Bai H, Mao L, Wang HS, Zhao J, Yang L, An TT, Wang X, Duan CJ, Wu NM, Guo ZQ, et al. Epidermal growth factor receptor mutations in plasma DNA samples predict tumor response in Chinese patients with stages IIIB to IV non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(16):2653–2659. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.17.3930. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Thatcher N, Chang A, Parikh P, Rodrigues Pereira J, Ciuleanu T, von Pawel J, Thongprasert S, Tan EH, Pemberton K, Archer V, et al. Gefitinib plus best supportive care in previously treated patients with refractory advanced nonsmall-cell lung cancer: results from a randomised, placebo-controlled, multi-centre study (Iressa Survival Evaluation in Lung Cancer) Lancet. 2005;366(9496):1527–1537. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67625-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Fukuoka M, Yano S, Giaccone G, Tamura T, Nakagawa K, Douillard JY, Nishiwaki Y, Vansteenkiste J, Kudoh S, Rischin D, et al. Multi-institutional randomized phase II trial of gefitinib for previously treated patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (The IDEAL 1 Trial) [corrected] J Clin Oncol. 2003;21(12):2237–2246. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2003.10.038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Kris MG, Natale RB, Herbst RS, Lynch TJ, Jr, Prager D, Belani CP, Schiller JH, Kelly K, Spiridonidis H, Sandler A, et al. Efficacy of gefitinib, an inhibitor of the epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase, in symptomatic patients with non-small cell lung cancer: a randomized trial. JAMA. 2003;290(16):2149–2158. doi: 10.1001/jama.290.16.2149. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Bezjak A, Tu D, Seymour L, Clark G, Trajkovic A, Zukin M, Ayoub J, Lago S, de Albuquerque Ribeiro R, Gerogianni A, et al. Symptom improvement in lung cancer patients treated with erlotinib: quality of life analysis of the National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group Study BR.21. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24(24):3831–3837. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2006.05.8073. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Pao W, Chmielecki J, Pao W, Chmielecki J. National, biologically based treatment of EGFR-mutant non-small-cell lung cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2010;10(11):760–774. doi: 10.1038/nrc2947. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Chang A, Parikh P, Thongprasert S, Tan EH, Perng RP, Ganzon D, Yang CH, Tsao CJ, Watkins C, Botwood N, et al. Gefitinib (IRESSA) in patients of Asian origin with refractory advanced non-small cell lung cancer: subset analysis from the ISEL study. J Thorac Oncol. 2006;1(8):847–855. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Tokumo M, Toyooka S, Kiura K, Shigematsu H, Tomii K, Aoe M, Ichimura K, Tsuda T, Yano M, Tsukuda K, et al. The relationship between epidermal growth factor receptor mutations and clinicopathologic features in non-small cell lung cancers. Clin Cancer Res. 2005;11(3):1167–1173. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Shigematsu H, Lin L, Takahashi T, Nomura M, Suzuki M, Wistuba II, Fong KM, Lee H, Toyooka S, Shimizu N, et al. Clinical and biological features associated with epidermal growth factor receptor gene mutations in lung cancers. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005;97(5):339–346. doi: 10.1093/jnci/dji055. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Kosaka T, Yatabe Y, Endoh H, Kuwano H, Takahashi T, Mitsudomi T. Mutations of the epidermal growth factor receptor gene in lung cancer: biological and clinical implications. Cancer Res. 2004;64(24):8919–8923. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-2818. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Marchetti A, Martella C, Felicioni L, Barassi F, Salvatore S, Chella A, Camplese PP, Iarussi T, Mucilli F, Mezzetti A, et al. EGFR mutations in non- small-cell lung cancer: analysis of a large series of cases and development of a rapid and sensitive method for diagnostic screening with potential implications on pharmacologic treatment. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23(4):857–865. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.08.043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Miller VA, Kris MG, Shah N, Patel J, Azzoli C, Gomez J, Krug LM, Pao W, Rizvi N, Pizzo B, et al. Bronchioloalveolar pathologic subtype and smoking history predict sensitivity to gefitinib in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22(6):1103–1109. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2004.08.158. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Pao W, Miller V, Zakowski M, Doherty J, Politi K, Sarkaria I, Singh B, Heelan R, Rusch V, Fulton L, et al. EGF receptor gene mutations are common in lung cancers from “never smokers” and are associated with sensitivity of tumors to gefitinib and erlotinib. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2004;101(36):13306–13311. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0405220101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Han SW, Kim TY, Hwang PG, Jeong S, Kim J, Choi IS, Oh DY, Kim JH, Kim DW, Chung DH, et al. Predictive and prognostic impact of epidermal growth factor receptor mutation in non-small-cell lung cancer patients treated with gefitinib. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23(11):2493–2501. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.01.388. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Huang SF, Liu HP, Li LH, Ku YC, Fu YN, Tsai HY, Chen YT, Lin YF, Chang WC, Kuo HP, et al. High frequency of epidermal growth factor receptor mutations with complex patterns in non-small cell lung cancers related to gefitinib responsiveness in Taiwan. Clin Cancer Res. 2004;10(24):8195–8203. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-04-1245. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Mendelsohn J, Baselga J. Status of epidermal growth factor receptor antagonists in the biology and treatment of cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2003;21(14):2787–2799. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2003.01.504. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Herbst RS, Maddox AM, Rothenberg ML, Small EJ, Rubin EH, Baselga J, Rojo F, Hong WK, Swaisland H, Averbuch SD, et al. Selective oral epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor ZD1839 is generally well-tolerated and has activity in non-small-cell lung cancer and other solid tumors: results of a phase I trial. J Clin Oncol. 2002;20(18):3815–3825. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2002.03.038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Baselga J, Rischin D, Ranson M, Calvert H, Raymond E, Kieback DG, Kaye SB, Gianni L, Harris A, Bjork T, et al. Phase I safety, pharmacokinetic, and pharmacodynamic trial of ZD1839, a selective oral epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, in patients with five selected solid tumor types. J Clin Oncol. 2002;20(21):4292–4302. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2002.03.100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Giaccone G, González-Larriba JL, van Oosterom AT, Alfonso R, Smit EF, Martens M, Peters GJ, van der Vijgh WJ, Smith R, Averbuch S, et al. Combination therapy with gefitinib, an epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, gemcitabine and cisplatin in patients with advanced solid tumors. Ann Oncol. 2004;15(5):831–838. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdh188. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Hirsch FR, Bunn PA., Jr EGFR testing in lung cancer is ready for prime time. Lancet Oncol. 2009;10(5):432–433. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(09)70110-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Riely GJ, Politi KA, Miller VA, Pao W. Update on epidermal growth factor receptor mutations in non-small cell lung cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2006;12(24):7232–7241. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-06-0658. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Su KY, Chen HY, Li KC, Kuo ML, Yang JC, Chan WK, Ho BC, Chang GC, Shih JY, Yu SL, et al. Pretreatment epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) T790M mutation predicts shorter EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor response duration in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30(4):433–440. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.38.3224. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Maheswaran S, Sequist LV, Nagrath S, Ulkus L, Brannigan B, Collura CV, Inserra E, Diederichs S, Iafrate AJ, Bell DW, et al. Detection of mutations in EGFR in circulating lung-cancer cells. NEngl J Med. 2008;359(4):366–377. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0800668. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Mok TS, Wu YL, Thongprasert S, Yang CH, Chu DT, Saijo N, Sunpaweravong P, Han B, Margono B, Ichinose Y, et al. Gefitinib or carboplatin-paclitaxel in pulmonary adenocarcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2009;361(10):947–957. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0810699. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Sequist LV, Martins RG, Spigel D, Grunberg SM, Spira A, Jänne PA, Joshi VA, McCollum D, Evans TL, Muzikansky A, et al. First-line gefitinib in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer harboring somatic EGFR mutations. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26(15):2442–2449. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.14.8494. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Rosell R, Molina MA, Costa C, Simonetti S, Gimenez-Capitan A, Bertran-Alamillo J, Mayo C, Moran T, Mendez P, Cardenal F, et al. Pretreatment EGFR T790M mutation and BRCA1 mRNA expression in erlotinib-treated advanced non-small-cell lung cancer patients with EGFR mutations. Clin Cancer Res. 2011;17(5):1160–1168. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-10-2158. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Han R, Zhong W, Zhao J, Zhang L, Xia Y, Wang H, Li L, Wang M. Comparison of EGFR mutation status in paired pre- and post-chemotherapy serum for advanced pulmonary adenocarcinoma. Zhongguo Fei Ai Za Zhi. 2011;14(2):127–131. doi: 10.3779/j.issn.1009-3419.2011.02.04. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Rosell R, Carcereny E, Gervais R, Vergnenegre A, Massuti B, Felip E, Palmero R, Garcia-Gomez R, Pallares C, Sanchez JM, et al. Spanish Lung Cancer Group in collaboration with Groupe Français de Pneumo-Cancérologie and Associazione Italiana Oncologia Toracica Erlotinib versus standard chemotherapy as first-line treatment for European patients with advanced EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (EURTAC): a multicentre, open-label, randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2012;13(3):239–246. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(11)70393-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Pao W, Miller VA, Politi KA, Riely GJ, Somwar R, Zakowski MF, Kris MG, Varmus H. Acquired resistance of lung adenocarcinomas to gefitinib or erlotinib is associated with a second mutation in the EGFR kinase domain. PLoS Med. 2005;2(3):e73. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0020073. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Kosaka T, Yatabe Y, Endoh H, Yoshida K, Hida T, Tsuboi M, Tada H, Kuwano H, Mitsudomi T. Analysis of epidermal growth factor receptor gene mutation in patients with non-small cell lung cancer and acquired resistance to gefitinib. Clin Cancer Res. 2006;12(19):5764–5769. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-06-0714. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Onitsuka T, Uramoto H, Nose N, Takenoyama M, Hanagiri T, Sugio K, Yasumoto K. Acquired resistance to gefitinib: the contribution of mechanisms other than the T790M, MET, and HGF status. Lung Cancer. 2010;68(2):198–203. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2009.05.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Wu YL, Zhong WZ, Li LY, Zhang XT, Zhang L, Zhou CC, Liu W, Jiang B, Mu XL, Lin JY, et al. Epidermal growth factor receptor mutations and their correlation with gefitinib therapy in patients with non-small cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis based on updated individual patient data from six medical centers in mainland China. J Thorac Oncol. 2007;2(5):430–439. doi: 10.1097/01.JTO.0000268677.87496.4c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Mitsudomi T, Morita S, Yatabe Y, Negoro S, Okamoto I, Tsurutani J, Seto T, Satouchi M, Tada H, Hirashima T, et al. West Japan Oncology Group Gefitinib versus cisplatin plus docetaxel in patients with non-smallcell lung cancer harbouring mutations of the epidermal growth factor receptor ( WJTOG3405): an open label, randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2010;11(2):121–128. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(09)70364-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Maemondo M, Inoue A, Kobayashi K, Sugawara S, Oizumi S, Isobe H, Gemma A, Harada M, Yoshizawa H, Kinoshita I, et al. North-East Japan Study Group Gefitinib or chemotherapy for non-small-cell lung cancer with mutated EGFR. N Engl J Med. 2010;362(25):2380–2388. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0909530. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Zhou C, Wu YL, Chen G, Feng J, Liu XQ, Wang C, Zhang S, Wang J, Zhou S, Ren S, et al. Erlotinib versus chemotherapy as first-line treatment for patients with advanced EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (OPTIMAL, CTONG-0802): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 study. Lancet Oncol. 2011;12(8):735–742. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(11)70184-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Inukai M, Toyooka S, Ito S, Asano H, Ichihara S, Soh J, Suehisa H, Ouchida M, Aoe K, Aoe M, et al. Presence of epidermal growth factor receptor gene T790M mutation as a minor clone in non-small cell lung cancer. Cancer Res. 2006;66(16):7854–7858. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-1951. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Oxnard GR, Arcila ME, Sima CS, Riely GJ, Chmielecki J, Kris MG, Pao W, Ladanyi M, Miller VA. Acquired resistance to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors in EGFR-mutant lung cancer: distinct natural history of patients with tumors harboring the T790M mutation. Clin Cancer Res. 2011;17(6):1616–1622. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-10-2692. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Chmielecki J, Foo J, Somwar R, Regales L, Vivanco I, Shen R, Michor F, Pao W. Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York EGFR T790M decreases growth potential of lung tumor cells with drug-sensitive EGFR mutant alleles in the absence of drug selection; American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting: Proceedings; 2009 Apr 18–22; Denver, CO. Philadelphia, PA: AACR; 2009. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Translational Oncology are provided here courtesy of Neoplasia Press

RESOURCES