Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: Transplantation. 2012 Feb 15;93(3):319–324. doi: 10.1097/TP.0b013e31823f7eea

TABLE 1.

Case details

Case 1 Case 2 Case 3 Case 4
Age at bortezomib treatment 14 mo 21 mo 13 mo 5 yr
Age at transplantation (mo) 10 19 13 26
Interval to AMR 4 mo 2 mo 7 d 35 mo
Pretransplant DX Myocarditis HLHS HLHS HLHS
Previous surgery No Stage I and II Norwood Stage I and II Norwood Stage I and II Norwood
Previous mechanical support ECMO, Berlin Heart ECMO No No
cPRA before bortezomib (%) 98 27 91 53
Previous treatment IVIg, PP, rituximab PP PP, IVIg PP, IVIg×8
Class I MFI before bortezomib, total (iDSA) 5414 (2970) 15,249 (11,249) 25,200 (19,200) 2524 (1959)a
Class I MFI after bortezomib, total (iDSA) 359 (347)a 6801 (4990) 805 (600) 152 (84)
Class I percent change MFI, total (iDSA) 93 (88) 55 (56) 97 (97) 81 (90)
Class II MFI pre, total (iDSA) 25,653 (11,300) 11,672 (8,9420) Not performed 5396 (4726)
Class II MRI post, total (iDSA) 4246 (3306) 1980 (1873) Not performed 274 (117)
Class II MFI percent change, total (iDSA) 83 (71) 83 (79) Not performed 95 (85)
a

Initial decline after institution of ECMO and plasmapheresis from 2524 (1959) to 805 (805).

AMR, antibody mediated rejection; HLHS, hypoplastic left heart syndrome; ECMO, extracorporeal membrane oxygenator; IVIg, intravenous immunoglobulin; PP, plasmapheresis; cPRA, calculated panel reactive antibody; iDSA, immunodominant donor specific antibody; MFI, mean fluorescent intensity.