Skip to main content
Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences logoLink to Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences
. 2010 Aug 13;18(2):201–207. doi: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2010.08.001

Usage of sewage effluent in irrigation of some woody tree seedlings. Part 3: Swietenia mahagoni (L.) Jacq.

Hayssam M Ali a,b,, EL-Sayed M EL-Mahrouk c, Fatma A Hassan a, Mohamed A EL-Tarawy c
PMCID: PMC3730611  PMID: 23961125

Abstract

A pot experiment was investigated to study the effect of sewage irrigation treatments (primary and secondary effluents) compared with tap water on the growth and chemical constituents of mahogany seedlings (Swietenia mahagoni (L.) Jacq.) as well as soil chemical properties. The experiment was conducted at a greenhouse in the nursery of Timber Trees Research Department of Sabahia, Horticultural Research Station in Alexandria, Egypt, from June 2003 to December 2004 for three irrigation periods (6, 12 and 18 months). The sewage effluent waters were taken from oxidation ponds located in New Borg EL-Arab city and used directly for irrigation.

The primary effluent treatment was superior than other treatments in improving the growth parameters (plant height, stem diameter, leaf area, leaves number, fresh and dry weights of leaves, shoots and roots and shoot/root ratio) and showed the highest concentration and total uptake of N, P, K, Cd, Ni, Pb and Fe in plant parts, followed by secondary effluent then tap water. The data revealed that soil salinity in terms of electrical conductivity of saturated paste (EC), CaCO3%, organic matter% and soluble anions and cations were influenced significantly by primary or secondary effluent treatment. The data also showed that the use of sewage effluent for irrigation increased N, P, K and DTPA-extractable-heavy metals (Cd, Cu, Ni, Pb, Fe, Mn and Zn). The effects of sewage effluent on growth parameters and elements content in plant parts and treated soil were more pronounced as water treatments were used for long period.

The results suggested that the use of sewage effluent in irrigating mahogany trees grown on calcareous sandy loam soil was an important agriculture practice for improving soil properties, increasing fuel and timber production, and is an economic and safe way to dispose wastewaters.

Keywords: Sewage effluent, Vegetative growth, Heavy metals, Uptake, Swietenia mahagoni

1. Introduction

In arid and semi-arid countries, water is becoming scarce resource to consider any sources of water, which might be used economically and effectively to promote further development. Rapid increases in population and industrial growth have led to use low quality water such as drainage and saline water as well as wastewater for irrigation.

Irrigation of forest species with wastewater for fuel and timber production is an approach which helps to overcome health hazards associated with sewage farming. Establishment of the green belts around the cities by forest trees under wastewater irrigation also helps revive the ecological balance and improves environmental conditions by self-treatment of wastewater through the application of forest irrigation.

The use of primary and secondary effluent in irrigation can improve the quality of the soil and plant growth because they are considered as natural conditioners through their nutrient elements and organic matter. However, the direct application of wastewater on agricultural land is limited by the extent of contamination with heavy metals, toxic organic chemicals and pathogens (EL-Nennah et al., 1982; Abulroos et al., 1996; Salem et al., 2000; Sebastiani et al., 2004; EL-Sayed, 2005; Singh and Bhati, 2005; Ali et al., 2010).

Swietenia mahagoni (L.) Jacq. (mahogany) is a hardwood tree belongs to family Meliaceae. Mahogany is a large tropical tree, with a height of more than 40–60 ft, a diameter at breast height (dbh) ranged from 30 to 105 cm and wood density is 560–720 kg/m3.

Mahogany is one of the true Mahoganies that has a heavy trunk, and is considered as one of the most valuable timber trees. Mahogany is extremely strong, hard, stable and decay resistant. The color of mahogany ranges from pale pink to dark reddish brown. It is rated among the top 12 timber woods in the world. It is readily available in large widths, thick thicknesses and lengths of timber. Its rich warm color and mellow texture finishes, stains and polishes to a beautiful natural luster. This wood is used for making fine jewelleries, decorative veneers and interiors and pattern-making mahogany is used in shipbuilding and for fine boat interiors.

At times, new model automobiles are originally carved, full size, entirely out of mahogany. Once the various parts – front bumper, dashboard, the drive shaft, back to the lock on the trunk are first fashioned with this beautiful stable wood. Once the thousands of parts have been refined to fit perfectly together, they are then used as patterns to make the moulds (Mathew, 1994).

Available data about the use of sewage for irrigating forest trees in Egypt soils are limited, therefore, this work is aimed to study the effects of irrigation with sewage effluent on the vegetative growth and chemical composition of S. mahagoni (L.) Jacq. (mahogany), as well as the soil chemical properties.

2. Materials and methods

This study was carried out at a greenhouse at the nursery of Timber Trees Research Department of Sabahia, Horticultural Research Station in Alexandria, Egypt. The study lasted for 18 months from June 2003 to December 2004, to investigate the effects of irrigation with different treatments of sewage effluent on the vegetative growth and chemical composition of S. mahagoni (L.) Jacq. and soil chemical properties for three periods (6, 12 and 18 months).

Two types of sewage effluent were used for irrigation, primary and secondary treated wastewater that were taken from oxidation ponds of sewage effluent treatment station in New Borg El-Arab City, Alexandria. The sewage effluent contains a mixture of domestic and industrial sources. Tap water was used as a control treatment. The analysis of the used water in irrigation is shown in Table 1. Trace elements in samples were analyzed using Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometer. Soluble N was determined by kjeldahle method (Page et al., 1982). Soluble P was determined by the ascorbic acid molybdenum blue method (Watanabe and Olsen, 1965). Dissolved oxygen (DO) was determined by the azide modification of winkler method and chemical oxygen demand (COD) by dichromate oxidation method. Five days biochemical oxygen demand (BOD5) was determined by the amount of oxygen lost after incubation for 5 days in the dark at 20 °C (APHA, 1995).

Table 1.

Average composition of water used in irrigation treatments in the experiment.

Sewage effluent
Parameter Primary treatment Secondary treatment Tap water Limits of wastewater for agric. reuse FAO (1992)
pH 6.82 7.56 6.80 6.50–8.40
E.C. ds/m 1.60 2.96 0.68 3.00–7.00



Soluble cations (meq/l)
Ca2+ 2.83 3.34 1.10
Mg2+ 2.21 3.31 1.90
K+ 0.23 0.26 0.20
Na+ 11.95 16.75 2.60



Soluble anions (meq/l)
CO3-
HCO3- 4.63 5.00 2.00 1.50–8.50
Cl 8.41 9.34 3.80



DO (mg/l) 0.00 2.90
BOD5 (mg/l) 220 100 40–500
COD (mg/l) 402 311 80–600
TSS (mg/l) 1024 1894



Soluble N (ppm) 1.25 1.08 0.26
Soluble P (ppm) 0.38 0.33 0.01



Total heavy metals (ppm)
Cd 0.02 0.01 0.007 0.01
Cu 0.14 0.19 0.009 0.20
Mn 0.06 0.05 0.014 0.20
Ni 0.02 0.01 0.002 0.20
Pb 0.25 0.24 0.02 5.00
Zn 1.86 1.07 0.09 2.00
Fe 12.5 8.60 0.26 5.00

Dissolved oxygen (DO), biochemical oxygen demand (BOD5) and chemical oxygen demand (COD).

One-year-old seedlings of S. mahagoni were used; seedlings averaged 28 cm in height and 3.6 mm in diameter (at 5 cm from the soil surface). The seedlings were planted on 1st March 2003 in earthenware pots (50 cm in height and 50 cm in diameter), filled with 25 kg of sandy loam soil (one seedling/pot). The physical and chemical properties of the used soil are shown in Table 2. All seedlings were irrigated with tap water for three months until adaptation on 1st June 2003 after that started the treatments with sewage effluent. The tree seedlings were irrigated to the field capacity to standardize the irrigation rate for the three treatments.

Table 2.

Physical and chemical analysis of the used soil.

Parameter Mean
Practical size distribution
Sand% 70.00
Silt% 20.00
Clay% 10.00
Soil texture Sandy loam
pH 8.31
E.C. ds/m 2.42
CaCOs% 32.04
Organic matter% 0.62



Soluble cations (meq/l)
Ca2+ 5.58
Mg2+ 6.15
Na+ 14.25
K+ 0.74



Soluble anions (meq/l)
CO3-
HCO3- 8.30
Cl 9.10
SO4- 9.42
Available P (ppm) 4.60
Available N (ppm) 7.28



DTPA-extractable-heavy metals (ppm)
Cd 0.00
Cu 0.77
Mn 1.44
Ni 1.11
Pb 2.13
Zn 0.89
Fe 3.10

2.1. The experiments design

A complete randomized design was used for the experiment as described by Snedecor and Cochran (1968). The three treatments were replicated three times, and each repetition contained four seedlings. The means among all used all treatments were compared by Duncan’s Multiple Range Test, according to Snedecor and Cochran (1968).

At the end of each period (6, 12 and 18 months), three seedlings for each treatment were chosen randomly to determine the following parameters:

2.1.1. Vegetative growth

Plant height (cm), stem diameter (mm), leaves number/plant, leaf area (cm2)/leaf, root length (cm), fresh and dry weights for leaves, shoots and roots (g) and shoot/root ratio.

2.1.2. Chemical composition of the different plant parts (leaves, shoots and roots)

N and P were measured colorimetrically according to Evenhuis (1976) and Murphy and Riley (1962), respectively. K and Na were measured against standard using a flame photometer (Page et al., 1982). Cd, Ni, Pb and Fe (ppm) were determined by Perkin Elmer, 3300 Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometer. Also, the total uptake of these elements in plant was calculated.

2.1.3. Soil analysis

At the end of each period, soil samples were taken from each treatment to determine their chemical properties according to Page et al. (1982). Heavy metals (Cd, Fe, Ni, Pb, Cu, Mn and Zn) were extracted by DTPA and measured in the solution by Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometer (Lindsay and Norvell, 1978).

3. Results and discussion

3.1. Vegetative growth

Results of vegetative growth parameters (plant height, stem diameter, leaves number, leaf area, leaves fresh and dry weight, shoots fresh dry weights) as affected by sewage effluent treatments are presented in Table 3.

Table 3.

Effect of sewage effluent on vegetative growth parameters of Swietenia mahagoni during 18 months (2003–2004).

Treatments Periods
6 months 12 months 18 months 6 months 12 months 18 months
Plant height (cm) Stem diameter (mm)
Tap water 53.00c 87.75c 211.25c 6.13c 12.33c 19.40c
Primary effluent 89.75a 144.75a 338.75a 14.23a 20.82a 35.75a
Secondary effluent 69.00b 117.25b 302.50b 9.33b 16.93b 30.00b
Leaves number/plant Leaf area/leaf (cm2)
Tap water 11.50c 11.66c 44.25c 188.47c 202.64c 265.71c
Primary effluent 22.75a 39.00a 138.25a 257.19a 285.94a 337.65a
Secondary effluent 17.00b 26.00b 116.50b 211.65b 239.51b 296.29b
Leaves fresh weight (g/plant) Leaves dry weight (g/plant)
Tap water 5.61c 13.99c 86.83c 1.00c 6.03c 36.91c
Primary effluent 34.34a 116.53a 282.14a 7.53a 35.60a 108.46a
Secondary effluent 17.05b 48.03b 239.62b 4.29b 16.97b 94.98b
Shoots fresh weight (g/plant) Shoots dry weight (g/plant)
Tap water 9.06c 37.38c 162.62c 1.71c 12.11c 82.03c
Primary effluent 50.33a 192.75a 659.75a 17.27a 88.35a 343.00a
Secondary effluent 28.80b 98.34b 472.28b 7.18b 43.03b 238.44b

Means followed by a similar letter within a column are not significantly different at the 0.05 level probability by Duncan’s Multiple Range Test.

Application of sewage effluent treatments increased significantly all the studied vegetative growth parameters compared with control (tap water). Generally, vegetative growth parameters at primary effluent treatments were significantly higher than those found at secondary effluent treatments, while tap water treatments gave the lowest values.

The results are explained by many investigators, who found that sewage effluent had a stimulatory effect on vegetative growth of trees, provided the soil with plant nutrients and organic matter and improved the soil physical characteristics, that reflected on the growth by enhancing the cell elongation and division (Kaneker et al. (1993) on Acacia nilotica, Hassan (1996) on Acacia saligna and Leucaena leucocephala, Berbec et al. (1999) on poplar, Guo and Sims (2000) on Eucalyptus globulus, Abbaas (2002) on Casuarina glauca, Taxodium distichum and Populus nigra, Bhati and Singh (2003) on Eucalyptus camaldulensis, EL-Sayed (2005) on Ceratonia siliqua, A. saligna and Acacia stenophylla, Singh and Bhati (2005) on Dalbergia sissoo and Ali et al. (2010) on Tipuana speciosa).

The results indicated that the growth parameters at any given sewage effluent treatments increased gradually with irrigation period and reached a maximum after 18 months of irrigation period.

3.2. Root characters

Table 4 exhibited that roots fresh and dry weights of S. mahagoni were the highest at primary sewage effluent treatment followed by secondary effluent treatment, then tap water treatment with significant differences among them. This trend was observed at the three studied growth periods. If the seedlings were allowed to grow for a longer period (from 6 to 18 months), roots fresh and dry weights would be greater regardless of sewage effluent treatments. In contrast to the above results, tap water treatment gave the longest root, followed by primary sewage effluent treatment, then secondary effluent treatment. This could be explained by accumulation of soluble salts and heavy metals as a result of applying sewage effluent, which might adverse root elongation. These results are in harmony with those of Nessel et al. (1982) on pond cypress, Hopmans et al. (1990) on E. camaldulensis and Pinus radiata, Gogate et al. (1995) on Tectona grandis and Hassan et al. (2002) on Albizzia lebbek, T. distichum and T. speciosa.

Table 4.

Effect of sewage effluent on the root characters and shoot/root ratio of Swietenia mahagoni during 18 months (2003–2004).

Treatments Periods
6 months 12 months 18 months 6 months 12 months 18 months
Roots fresh weight (g/plant) Roots dry weight (g/plant)
Tap water 14.33c 18.97c 72.78c 3.69c 8.32c 39.73c
Primary effluent 50.31a 83.76a 243.82a 19.37a 28.31a 114.28a
Secondary effluent 32.19b 45.93b 152.93b 7.86b 16.37b 73.40b
Root length (cm) Shoot/root ratio
Tap water 85.75a 100.50a 120.50a 0.73b 2.18a 2.99a
Primary effluent 80.75a 91.75a 117.00a 1.28a 4.37a 3.95a
Secondary effluent 72.00a 85.50a 108.75a 1.45a,b 3.67a 4.54a

Means followed by a similar letter within a column are not significantly different at the 0.05 level probability by Duncan’s Multiple Range Test.

The data also indicated that the effect of sewage effluent on shoot/root ratio was slight and after 6, 12 and 18 months tap water treatment gave a lower value for shoot/root ratio compared with primary and secondary effluent treatments with significant difference between primary and secondary effluent treatments and tap water treatment after 6 months only.

Data of the root characters are in agreement with those of Sebastiani et al. (2004) on poplar and EL-Sayed (2005) on C. siliqua.

3.3. Chemical composition

Generally, irrigation with primary effluent gave the highest concentrations of N, P, K, Cd, Ni, Pb and Fe in leaves, shoots and roots of S. mahagoni followed by secondary effluent treatment, then tap water (Tables 5 and 6).

Table 5.

Effect of sewage effluent on leaves (L), shoots (S) and roots (R) N, P and K percentage and total uptake of Swietenia mahagoni during 18 months (2003–2004).

Treatments Periods
6 months
12 months
18 months
6 months
12 months
18 months
L S R L S R L S R L S R L S R L S R
N (%)
Total N uptake (g/plant)
Tap water 0.92c 0.52c 0.57c 0.94c 0.68c 0.66c 0.59b 0.59c 0.54b 0.04c 0.19c 0.92c
Primary effluent 2.09a 1.49a 1.51a 1.82a 1.49a 1.23a 1.92a 1.14a 1.15a 0.71a 2.31a 7.31a
Secondary effluent 1.77b 1.24b 1.24b 1.22b 0.88b 0.96b 1.57a 0.93b 0.95a 0.26b 0.74b 4.41b
P (%)
Total P uptake (g/plant)
Tap water 0.34b 0.32c 0.26c 0.22b 0.17b 0.19b 0.21b 0.18b 0.22c 0.03c 0.05c 0.31c
Primary effluent 0.52a 0.54a 0.57a 0.46a 0.22a 0.30a 0.76a 0.52a 0.54a 0.24a 0.44a 3.23a
Secondary effluent 0.47a 0.41b 0.45b 0.37a 0.20a,b 0.19b 0.45b 0.36a 0.40b 0.08b 0.18b 1.58b
K (%)
Total K uptake (g/plant)
Tap water 0.87b 0.75b 0.42c 0.79b 0.63b 0.43c 0.70b 0.48b 0.46c 0.04c 0.16c 0.83c
Primary effluent 1.39a 0.87a 0.70a 1.16a 0.80a 0.76a 1.23a 0.83a 0.73a 0.39a 1.33a 5.02a
Secondary effluent 0.97b 0.79b 0.56b 0.90 0.73a,b 0.58b 0.95b 0.57b 0.60b 0.14b 0.56b 2.70b

Means followed by a similar letter within a column are not significantly different at the 0.05 level probability by Duncan’s Multiple Range Test.

Table 6.

Effect of sewage effluent on leaves (L), shoots (S) and roots (R) Cd, Ni, Pb and Fe percentage and total uptake of Swietenia mahagoni during 18 months (2003–2004).

Treatments Periods
6 months
12 months
18 months
6 months
12 months
18 months
L S R L S R L S R L S R L S R L S R
Cd (ppm)
Total Cd uptake (mg/plant)
Tap water 0.27b 0.30c 0.57c 0.05b 0.03b 0.06c 0.06b 0.21b 0.22b 0.01c 0.01b 0.03c
Primary effluent 2.83a 2.23a 3.37a 2.60a 1.93a 2.70a 1.96a 1.70a 1.90a 0.13a 0.34a 1.01a
Secondary effluent 0.90b 1.10b 1.87b 0.80b 1.00ab 1.06b 0.56b 1.33a 0.90b 0.03b 0.07b 0.44b
Ni (ppm)
Total Ni uptake (mg/plant)
Tap water 12.33c 8.67b 15.33c 14.33c 11.33c 11.67c 10.33c 9.33b 11.66c 0.08c 0.32c 1.61c
Primary effluent 43.33a 37.33a 46.67a 134.33a 117.00a 136.00a 151.33a 126.33a 159.00a 1.87a 18.97a 77.91a
Secondary effluent 31.67b 28.33a 35.33b 98.33b 95.66b 92.67b 114.33b 102.33a 119.66b 0.62b 7.30b 44.04b
Pb (ppm)
Total Pb uptake (mg/plant)
Tap water 38.00c 31.00c 39.00c 43.66c 36.33c 36.66c 42.00c 24.33c 31.67b 0.23c 1.01c 4.80c
Primary effluent 122.33a 114.33a 170.00a 131.33a 114.33a 147.00a 150.67a 135.66a 155.33a 6.19a 18.94a 80.62a
Secondary effluent 90.67b 95.33b 111.67b 105.66b 84.67b 81.33b 102.33b 77.33b 162.67a 1.95b 6.77b 40.10b
Fe (ppm)
Total Fe uptake (mg/plant)
Tap water 195.67c 147.67c 246.67b 148.67c 95.33b 130.00c 106.67c 93.33c 111.67c 1.36b 3.13c 16.03c
Primary effluent 405.00a 398.67a 530.00a 356.67a 323.33a 370.00a 359.33a 303.33a 346.67a 20.26a 51.74a 182.63a
Secondary effluent 232.33b 242.33b 320.00b 223.33b 174.33b 240.00b 280.00b 213.33b 250.00b 5.25b 15.22b 95.81b

Means followed by a similar letter within a column are not significantly different at the 0.05 level probability by Duncan’s Multiple Range Test.

The concentrations of N, P and K in leaves were much higher than those of shoots and roots. The increase of N, P, K, Cd, Ni, Pb and Fe in plant parts might be attributed to an increase in the occupancy root zone by applying sewage effluents that reflected on their uptake by roots. The results agree with the findings of Singh and Bhati (2005) who found that concentrations of N, P and K were greater in foliage compared to the other plant parts. In contrary heavy metals (Cd, Ni, Pb and Fe) tended to accumulate in root more than that in leaves and shoots with few exceptions. When irrigation time increased from 6 to 18 months the uptake of N, P, K, Cd, Ni, Pb and Fe in the whole plant was increased due to progressive increase of vegetative growth. Also EL-Sayed (2005) found that irrigation with secondary effluent increased N, P, K, Ca, Mg, Na, Fe, Zn, Mn, Cu, Pb, Cd, Cr and Ni in leaves, stems and roots of tree species (C. siliqua, A. saligna and A. stenophylla) compared with tap water.

The magnitude of increase of the studied heavy metals in the whole plant due to primary effluent treatment compared with tap water after 18 months ranged from 2 to 9 times for all elements and can be arranged in the following order: Cd > Ni > Pb > Fe.

3.4. General soil characterization

Data in Table 7 revealed that the soil salinity in terms of electrical conductivity (EC) of saturated paste, CaCO3%, organic matter% and soluble anions and cations was influenced by either primary or secondary effluent treatment where, pH value was slightly changed by irrigation with sewage effluent. EC values of soil treated with sewage effluent were corresponding to EC values of irrigation water treatment; therefore, EC of soil irrigated with tap water was decreased to 1.65 and 1.55 ds/m after 12 and 18 months, respectively, of irrigation periods. However EC of soil treated with secondary and primary effluent was ranged between 2.78 and 3.19, respectively. Meantime, the soluble cations and anions followed the same trend of EC of soil except for Ca2+ and SO4-.

Table 7.

Effect of sewage effluent on the used soil properties during 18 months (2003–2004) under Swietenia mahagoni plantation.

Parameter 6 months
12 months
18 months
Tap water Primary effluent Secondary effluent Tap water Primary effluent Secondary effluent Tap water Primary effluent Secondary effluent
pH 8.19 8.37 8.00 8.14 8.08 8.05 8.08 8.30 8.33
E.C. ds/m 2.51 2.60 3.14 1.50 2.76 3.40 1.44 2.95 3.48
CaCO3% 30.26 30.26 31.15 28.48 32.04 30.26 30.26 31.15 31.15
O.M% 0.64 0.89 0.84 0.67 1.08 0.94 0.67 1.20 0.98
Ca2+ (6.25) 5.15 6.60 3.60 3.90 3.96 3.24 5.88 3.60 3.60
Mg2+ (7.88) 4.40 4.65 2.18 3.13 3.52 3.39 4.22 3.96 3.00
Na+ (12.50) 15.00 20.00 8.75 20.15 27.50 8.75 20.00 28.50 23.50
K+ (0.58) 0.64 0.93 0.48 0.68 0.68 0.30 0.54 0.54 0.62
CO3- (–)
HCO3 (3.32) 2.32 3.98 3.36 2.98 3.65 3.98 4.81 5.81 5.15
Cl (11.47) 12.59 18.51 5.10 15.94 18.20 6.92 14.01 19.11 18.20
SO4- (12.42) 12.28 9.69 6.65 8.79 13.81 4.78 11.73 11.68 7.97
Available P (ppm) 0.80 6.30 4.40 1.80 8.50 5.20 1.00 9.20 5.90
Available N (ppm) 7.00 13.40 11.20 7.30 21.20 15.12 5.40 22.52 17.60
DTPA-extractable-heavy metals ppm
Cd 0.07 0.03 0.09 0.05 0.05 0.01
Fe 3.10 2.98 3.64 3.28 3.40 3.44 3.10 3.12 4.66
Ni 1.11 1.52 6.70 5.10 1.62 6.21 4.10 1.92 5.87
Pb 2.13 2.50 7.96 6.87 2.42 6.50 6.54 2.21 6.32
Cu 0.77 0.57 0.71 0.69 0.66 0.68 0.66 0.59 0.54
Mn 1.44 1.44 1.8 1.62 0.81 0.72 0.66 0.66 0.52
Zn 0.89 0.72 1.54 1.16 0.74 1.50 1.10 0.68 1.42

It is clear, from Table 7, that irrigation with sewage effluent decreased the CaCO3 content from 32.04% to 28.48% and 27.59% for primary and secondary effluent treatments, respectively, after 18 months of irrigation period. This is probably due to the fact that same CaCO3 was dissolved by the organic acids present in sewage and leached down in soil.

Furthermore, organic matter content increased as irrigation period with sewage effluent increased, with higher values for primary effluent compared with secondary. Available P and N were also increased more by primary effluent compared to secondary effluent, while tap water gave the lowest values. It is clear that available P and N were accumulated more as period of irrigation increased.

The results agree with those of EL-Nennah et al. (1982) who found that the use of sewage effluent in irrigation resulted in remarkable change of organic matter, available P and total and soluble N which might have been added to soils upon irrigation.

3.5. Extractable-heavy metals

Results given in Table 7 show the DTPA-extractable Cd, Cu, Fe, Mn, Ni, Pb and Zn as affected by irrigation with primary and secondary effluent compared with tap water treatment. The results indicated that DTPA-extractable Cd, Cu, Ni and Pb increased as irrigation period increased by sewage effluent treatments compared to tap water with greater values for primary effluent treatment. Whereas, extractable Fe, Mn and Zn as affected by treatments were not in a consistent trend.

Many investigators stated that heavy metals accumulated in soil resulted from continuous irrigation with sewage effluent (EL-Nennah et al., 1982; Abulroos et al., 1996; Salem et al., 2000). This increment of heavy metals in soil and consequently in edible parts of field crop plant should be considered, which adversely affect human and animal health through food-chain. It would be of a great advantage to grow forest trees such as S. mahagoni in heavily polluted areas or soil irrigated with sewage effluent without serious problems.

References

  1. Abbaas, M.M., 2002. Effect of some heavy metals in the irrigation water on growth and chemical constituents of some timber trees. Ph.D. thesis, Fac. Agric., Cairo. Univ.
  2. Abulroos S.A., Holah Sh.Sh., Badawy S.H. Background levels of some heavy metals in soil and corn in Egypt. Egypt. J. Soil Sci. 1996;36:83–95. [Google Scholar]
  3. Ali H.M., El-Mahrouk E.M., Hassan Fatma A., Khamis M.H. Nanotechnology in Life Sciences; Alasa City at King Faisal University: 2010. Growth, Chemical Compositions and Soil Properties of Tipuana speciosa Irrigated with Sewage Effluent. The 25th Meeting of Saudi Biological Society. [Google Scholar]
  4. APHA, AWWA and WPCF . 19th ed. Washington; DC: 1995. Standard Method for Examination of Waters and Wastewater. [Google Scholar]
  5. Berbec S., Szewczuk C., Sugier D. The effect of irrigation with municipal sewage on the catching and growth rate of poplar trees. Folia Univ. Agric. 1999;77:27–31. [Google Scholar]
  6. Bhati M., Singh G. Growth and mineral accumulation in Eucalyptus camaldulensis seedlings irrigated with mixed industrial effluent. Bioresour. Technol. 2003;88:221–228. doi: 10.1016/s0960-8524(02)00317-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. EL-Nennah M., EL-Kobbia T., Shehata A., EL-Gamal I. Effect of irrigation loamy sand soil by sewage effluents on its content of some nutrients and heavy metals. Plant Soil. 1982;65:289–292. [Google Scholar]
  8. EL-Sayed, N.A.A., 2005. The impact of irrigation with treated wastewater effluent on soil bio-physicochemical properties and on growth and heavy metals content of some fodder trees grown on calcareous soil. Ph.D. thesis, Fac. Agric., Tanta Univ.
  9. Evenhuis B. Report Royal Tropical Inst.; Amsterdam: 1976. Simplified Methods for Foliar Analysis, Parts I–VII, Internal. [Google Scholar]
  10. FAO, Food and Agriculture Organization of United Nations, 1992. Wastewater treatment and use in agriculture. In: Pescod, M.B. (Ed.), Irrigation and Drainage, Paper 47, FAO, Rome.
  11. Gogate M.G., Farooqui U.M., Joshi V.S. Sewage water as potential for the tree growth: a study on teak (Tectona grandis) plantation. Indian Forester. 1995;121(6):472–481. (CAB. Abst. 1996, 0601478) [Google Scholar]
  12. Guo L.B., Sims R.E.H. Effect of meat works effluent irrigation on soil, tree biomass production and nutrient uptake in Eucalyptus globulus seedlings in growth cabinets. Bioresour. Technol. 2000;72:243–251. [Google Scholar]
  13. Hassan Fatma.A. Effect of sewage effluent irrigation on growth, specific gravity and fiber length of Acacia saligna and Leucaena leucocephala seedlings. J. Agric. Sci. Mansoura Univ. 1996;21(11):4093–4099. [Google Scholar]
  14. Hassan, Fatma A., EL-Juhany, L.I., EL-Settawy, A.A., Shehata, M.S., 2002. Effects of irrigation with sewage effluent on the growth of some forest trees species, physical and chemical properties of the soil. In: Proceeding of the second Conference “Sustainable Agricultural Development” 8–10 May, Fayoum, pp. 300–311.
  15. Hopmans P., Stewart H.T.L., Flinn D.W., Hillman T.J. Growth, biomass production and nutrient accumulation by seven tree species irrigated with municipal effluent at Wodonga, Australia. Forest Ecol. Manag. 1990;30:203–211. [Google Scholar]
  16. Kaneker P., Kumbhojkar M.S., Ghate V., Sarnaik S., Kelkar A. Evaluation of Acacia nilotica (L.) DEL. and Casuarina equisetifolia forest for tolerance and growth on microbially treated dyestuff wastewater. Environ. Pollut. 1993;81:47–50. doi: 10.1016/0269-7491(93)90027-l. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Lindsay W.L., Norvell W.A. Development of DTPA soil test for zinc, iron, manganese and copper. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 1978;42:421–428. [Google Scholar]
  18. Mathew, B. (Ed.), (1994). CITES Guide to Plants in Trade, CITES Department of Environment.
  19. Murphy J., Riley J.P. A modified single solution method for the determination of phosphate in natural water. Anal. Chem. Acta. 1962;27:31–36. [Google Scholar]
  20. Nessel J.K., Ewel K.C., Burnett M. Wastewater enrichment increases mature pond cypress growth rates. Forest Sci. 1982;28(2):400–403. [Google Scholar]
  21. Page A.L., Miller R.H., Keeny D.R. second ed. Agronomy Monogr. ASA and SSSA; Medison, WI: 1982. Methods of Soil Analysis, Part II. [Google Scholar]
  22. Salem M.M., El-Amir S., Abdel-Aziz S.M., Kandil M.F., Mansour S.F. Effect of irrigation with sewage water on some chemical characteristics of soils and plant. Egypt. J. Soil Sci. 2000;40:49–59. [Google Scholar]
  23. Sebastiani L., Scebba F., Tognetti R. Heavy metal accumulation and growth responses in poplar clones eridano (Populus deltoides X maximowiczii) and I–214 (P. X euramerilana) exposed to industrial waste. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2004;52:79–88. [Google Scholar]
  24. Singh G., Bhati M. Growth of Dalbergia sissoo in desert regions of western India using municipal effluent and the subsequent changes in soil and plant chemistry. Bioresour. Technol. 2005;96:1019–1028. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2004.09.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Snedecor G.W., Cochran W.G. sixth ed. The Iowa State Univ. Press Ames. Iowa; USA: 1968. Statistical Methods. [Google Scholar]
  26. Watanabe F.S., Olsen S.R. Test of an ascorbic acid method for determining phosphorus in water and NaHCO3 extracts from soil. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 1965;22:677–678. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES