Abstract
Bone metastases, present in 70% of patients with metastatic breast cancer, lead to skeletal disease, fractures and intense pain, which are all believed to be mediated by tumor cells. Engraftment of tumor cells is supposed to be preceded by changes in the target tissue to create a permissive microenvironment, the pre-metastatic niche, for the establishment of the metastatic foci. In bone metastatic niche, metastatic cells stimulate bone consumption resulting in the release of growth factors that feed the tumor, establishing a vicious cycle between the bone remodeling system and the tumor itself. Yet, how the pre-metastatic niches arise in the bone tissue remains unclear. Here we show that tumor-specific T cells induce osteolytic bone disease before bone colonization. T cells pro-metastatic activity correlate with a pro-osteoclastogenic cytokine profile, including RANKL, a master regulator of osteoclastogenesis. In vivo inhibition of RANKL from tumor-specific T cells completely blocks bone loss and metastasis. Our results unveil an unexpected role for RANKL-derived from T cells in setting the pre-metastatic niche and promoting tumor spread. We believe this information can bring new possibilities for the development of prognostic and therapeutic tools based on modulation of T cell activity for prevention and treatment of bone metastasis.
Introduction
The role of the immune system in controlling cancer was first hypothesized more than one hundred years ago [1]. However, the concept of Immunosurveillance as a response of the adaptive immune system came up with the proposition of the Clonal Selection Theory by Burnet and the demonstration that tumor specific antigens in fact exist [1,2]. More recently, immune selection of malignant cells based on differences on antigen specificities supported the idea of “immunoediting” [1,3,4] adding the possibility of a pro-tumoral activity to the previously proposed concept of immunosurveillance. Once the tumor is “shaped” by the immunoselection mechanisms, it will be in equilibrium with the host immune system, until it can escape. To escape, a tumor cell must modify its intrinsic and extrinsic factors [5,6], favoring its own growth. In fact, extrinisic factors represented by stromal cells, extracellular matrix and hematopoietic cells [7–10] can be either protective or pro-tumorigenic.
Regarding the immune system, tumor cells might express co-inhibitory molecules and secrete cytokines that will subvert the immune response [1,5,11]. Tumor associated macrophages (TAM), for example, characterized as M2 subtype, can produce a series of cytokines that will favor tumor growth and lung metastasis [12,13] in response to Th2 cells modulation [14]. When it comes to bone metastasis, although the role of osteoclasts (a specialized bone macrophage) in creating a permissive environment for tumor colonization is well known [15,16], the role of T cell in regulating osteoclasts in bone metastasis and cancer induced bone disease is not known [17,18]
The presence of T cells in the bone cavity has been well documented. Bone marrow CD4+ T cells are involved in the control of normal hematopoiesis [19] and are present in the hematopoietic stem cell niche [20], which is also occupied by cancer metastasis [21]. As an active component of the bone marrow microenvironment [22], CD4+ T cells have also been found to have an impact on the bone remodeling process through induction or regulation of molecules, such as RANKL, involved in bone metabolism [23–25]. RANKL, is a pleiotropic molecule expressed by different cell types and with multiple functions [26,27]. In bone tissue physiology, RANKL is a key molecule which promotes osteoclast (OC) differentiation and activation, and its absence in osteoblasts, chondrocytes or osteocytes leads to abnormal bone formation or remodeling [28,29]. RANKL is also present in CD4+ T cells after activation [27] and it was shown to be preferentially expressed in Th17 cells [30]. Although, these cells are clearly involved in the pathogenesis of autoimmune arthritis, and are therapeutic targets in both experimental and human disease [31,32], no direct role of Th17 cells in bone loss has been shown until now. Th17 cells have been shown to induce osteoclastogenesis indirectly, through induction of RANKL expression in osteoblasts and synoviocytes [30].
Since T cells can “shape” the tumor, orchestrate metastatic colonization to the lungs, and are active components of the inflammatory osteolytic disease, it seemed reasonable to ask if T cells from mice bearing a bone metastatic tumor would play any role in the osteolytic bone disease and/or bone and BM colonization.
Material and Methods
Detection of primary tumor growth and spontaneous metastasis
All animal experiments were in accordance to the Brazilian National Cancer Institute (INCA) guidelines for animal use in research and approved at CCS animal committee at Federal University of Rio de Janeiro (license number IMPPG027). Females BALB/c and BALB/c nude mice were obtained from INCA or IPEN/CNEN/USP. The tumor lines 67NR and 4T1 were kindly provided by Dr. Fred Miller from Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI [33]. Female BALB/c mice (6-8 weeks old) were inoculated with 104 cells in the fourth mammary fat pad. Primary tumors maximum diameter was obtained by ultrasound measurement [34]. Numbers of metastatic cells in LNs and indicated bones were determined using a clonogenic metastatic assay supplemented with 6-thioguanine. Presence of metastatic cells was also evaluated by RT-PCR to cytokeratin 19 (CK19), and GAPDH for normalization. To prepare 4T1 soluble tumor-Ag (sAg), tumor, were dissected, ressuspended in ice cold PBS, filtered through 40 µm cell strainer, disrupted by freezing and thawing 5x, boiled for 10 min and centrifuged at 14,000 rpm, for 30 min, at 4°C.
In vitro assays for osteoclast formation and activity
Freshly isolated femur BM cells from BALB/c mice (6–8 weeks old) were cultured at a density of 1x105 cells per well, in 24-well plates, in DMEM plus 10% FBS, containing supernatants from sAg stimulated iliac BM cells in the presence of M-CSF (10ng/mL), with or without recombinant OPG (10ng/mL) (Peprotech) or rat anti-mouse IL-17F mAb (10ng/mL) (R&D systems), for 7 days, at 37°C. Positive controls received recombinant RANKL (10ng/mL) (Peprotech). TRAP staining (Sigma) and pit formation assays (osteologic disks from BD Biosciences) were carried according to the manufacturer’s protocol. TRAP-positive cells containing three or more nuclei were counted as OCs.
Analysis of serum cytokine and production by LN, spleen or BM derived T cells
Single cell suspensions from bones were obtained after collagenase Type I (1 mg/mL) and DNase (100 µg/mL) treatment at 37°C, for 60 min. After mechanical disruption, draining LNs, spleens, and the indicated bones were cultured (107 cells/ml) with 50µg/mL of sAg, in 24-well plates for 72 hs. Cytokine content was measured by ELISA (R&D Systems). Flow cytometry was performed 3 days after sAgstimulation. PMA (20 ng/mL, Calbiochem) and ionomycin (0.2 µg/mL, Sigma-Aldrich) were added to the last 4 hs and, brefeldin A (Sigma-Aldrich) for the last 2 hs of culture. Anti-mouse CD16/32 mAb (clone 2.4G2) was used for Fc blockage. PE-Cy5-conjugated rat anti-mouse CD3 mAb (clone 145-2C11), APC-conjugated rat anti-mouse CD4 mAb (clone GK 1.5), FITC-conjugated rat anti-mouse IL-17F mAb (clone 316016), PE-conjugated rat anti-mouse RANKL mAb (88227), or isotype controls (BD Biosciences) were used and data collected on a FACSCalibur® (BD Biosciences) and analyzed using FlowJo® software (Tree Star).
Bone Histomorphometry and Micro-Computed Tomography
Iliac bones from BALB/c or nude mice transferred with T cells were fixed in 10% formalin, decalcified in 20% of EDTA for two weeks, and embedded in paraffin. 5µm serial sections were stained with H&E or TRAP according to standard techniques. Slides were scanned using scanscope (A p e r i o®). Bone histomorphometry was performed using a semiautomatic image analysis program (Motic®). TRAP-positive stained OCs were assessed in the same tissue sections and expressed as number of OCs/mm of bone length. Iliac bones were also fixed in 70% ethanol and high resolution microtomography nondestructive three-dimensional evaluation of bone volume. Bones were scanned in Skyscan® 1076 MicroCT (Skyscan, Kontich, Belgium) at 70 kV, 141 µA, Al 0.5 mm filter and 12.56 pixel size. Reconstruction was performed using Nrecon software (Skyscan, Kontich, Belgium), using for smoothing, beam-hardening and ring-artifact, correction respectively 1, 30 and 10 levels. Grey scale range was set from 0.0000 to 0.0411 HU. The reconstructed MicroCT files were used to analyze the samples and to create volume renderings of the region of interest. Bone volume and mineral density was performed using CTAnalyser software (Skyscan, Kontich, Belgium).
Adoptive transfers
Briefly, 11 days after tumor inoculation, bone marrow cells were obtained as described above. T cells were positively selected using magnetic beads covered with anti-mouse CD3 (Miltenyi Biotec). CD3+ purified T cells (more than 90% pure) were adoptively transferred (1x106 cells/mouse), i.v., into naïve female BALB/c nude mice (6 mice/group) along with single dose of sAg (25 µg/mouse). In another experimental set, total LN cells from naïve or tumor-bearing BALB/c mice were used, and 67NR tumor cell were injected into the mammary fat-pad as the Ag source. Two weeks later, splenocytes were stimulated in vitro with sAg (50µg/mL) or rat anti-mouse CD3 (1µg/mL). Non-stimulated cells from all groups were used as controls. Cells were analyzed by flow cytometry and supernatants were evaluated by ELISA, as previously described.
RANKL and IL-17F knock-down in T cells of 4T1-tumor bearing mice and mRNA evaluation of CD3+ cells.
In order to knock-down RANKL and IL-17F in LN T cells of 4T1 tumor-bearing mice, cells were transfected with specific murine shRNA (RANKL shRNA Plasmid (m): sc-37270-SH and IL-17F shRNA Plasmid (m): sc-146204-SH, SantaCruz Biotechnologies) using AMAXA transfection kit for primary murine T cells (VPA-1006, Amaxa® Mouse T Cell Nucleofector® Kit, Lonza). Final concentrations of plasmids were 3 µg, or 6 µg for double transfection. 3 hs after transfection, viable T cells (50–60%) were adoptively transferred into BALB/c nude mice along with sAg (25 µg/mouse). The presence of injected cells in spleens and BMs of nude mice was examined in the end of experiments (day 6 after transfer) by RT-PCR using mouse specific primers to CD3 and GAPDH for normalization.
Statistical analyses
Data values are expressed as the mean±SD, from at least three independent experiments. Statistical differences between mean values were evaluated by ANOVA, and pairwise comparisons were done by the Tukey test. p values of ≤ 0.05 or ≤ 0.001 were considered to be statistically significant (minimum n=3). Arabic letters indicate significant differences amongst groups.
Results
Animals bearing breast metastatic tumors produce high levels of pro-osteoclastogenic cytokines
In order to examine whether there was a relationship between tumor invasiveness and a specific pattern of immune response, we used as a model two sibling cell lines, derived from a spontaneous mammary gland tumor from a BALB/c mouse [35]. The 67NR cell line presents a local and self-contained growth, while its sibling 4T1 shows an invasive behavior with development of metastases to the LN, bones and lungs among other tissues. Female BALB/c mice were implanted in the fourth mammary fat pad either with 4T1 or 67NR cell lines, and 35 d after tumor injection, we compared the cytokine levels in the serum and in the supernatants of anti-CD3 stimulated LN cells from mice of both groups (Figure 1, A and B). Significantly higher levels of the pro-osteoclastogenic cytokines IL-17F, RANKL, IL-1β, TNFα, and IL-6 were detected in the sera and supernatants from LN-stimulated cells of animals bearing the metastatic tumors than in mice with non-metastatic tumors. Conversely, the levels of anti-osteoclastogenic cytokines such as IFN-γ [25,36] and IL-10 [37] were higher in the group of mice implanted with non-metastatic tumors. Moreover, the ratio between OPG (a decoy receptor for RANKL) and RANKL was 10 to 20 fold lower in the serum of animals bearing metastatic tumors than in mice with non-metastatic tumors. The low OPG/RANKL ratio happened at the expenses of both a decreased OPG and an increased RANKL level, surely indicating a pro-osteoclastogenic activity (Figure 1C). These results show that a prominent pro-osteoclastogenic cytokine profile is present in animals bearing 4T1 metastatic, but not 67NR non-metastatic tumors.
Bone marrow pro-osteoclastogenic cytokine production in response to tumor-antigen stimulation precedes metastatic colonization of the bone marrow
To understand if the production of pro-osteoclastogenic cytokines observed at 35 d after tumor implantation is cause or consequence of metastases to the bone, we looked at the kinetics of the colonization of the bone cavity by tumor cells as well as the kinetics of production of pro-osteoclastogenic cytokines in the marrow microenvironment. Using a clonogenic metastatic assay as well as molecular analyses, we observed that no metastatic clones are present in the draining LNs of the tumor until day 14 p.i., and until day 16 p.i. in the BM (Figure 2A).
We then looked at the profile of cytokine production in the marrow microenvironment. To do that, BM cells from animals bearing 4T1 or 67NR tumors were collected from day 11 to d 35 p.i., the cells were stimulated with tumor soluble antigen (sAg) in vitro and level of different cytokines was measured by ELISA (Figure 2B). We found that bone marrow cells from metastatic 4T1 bearing mice secreted higher concentrations of pro-osteoclastogenic cytokines than cells from 67NR bearing animals, even at early time points. Of note is the fact that BM cells from naïve animals do not produce any detectable cytokines after sAg stimulation. This pattern was observed in all bones tested (Figure S1A), although it was more prominently seen in the iliac bone, which is rich in trabecular bone and also a major site of metastasis (Figure S1B). Surprisingly, we observed no differences in the expression of IL-17A – a T cell–derived cytokine that is involved in the pathogenesis of osteolytic lesions in rheumatoid arthritis [30,31] – between BM cells from mice bearing metastatic or non-metastatic tumors (Figure 2B). Increased levels of IL-17F were observed in response to tumor antigens nonetheless.
To ascertain that the T cell pro-osteoclastogenic phenotype observed in the BM could lead to generation of functional OCs, we generated supernatants from tumor-stimulated BM cells, and tested the ability of these supernatants to induce osteoclastogenesis in BM cell cultures in vitro, in the presence of M-CSF, a cytokine required to induce RANK expression in the marrow pre-OCs. Supernatants from T cells stimulated with 4T1 antigens induced functional OCs differentiation (Figure 2C, left panel). This was confirmed when TRAP activity was measured (Figure 2C, middle panels). These differentiated cells were competent as they consumed mineral matrix present in osteologic disks in vitro (Figure 2C, right panel). These functional activities were inhibited by OPG, a decoy receptor for RANKL, but not by anti-IL-17F, suggesting that T cell derived RANKL is the major osteoclastogenic molecule in this setting.
Bone loss precedes metastatic colonization of the bone cavity
To understand the impact of pro-osteoclastogenic cytokines production in the bone dynamics, we looked at its effect on osteoclastogenesis and bone mass in vivo. We evaluated osteoclastogenesis by counting the number of multinucleated TRAP+ cells per millimeter (mm) of bone surface in the different conditions. We found a large increase in the number of OCs in mice implanted with metastatic 4T1 cells as compared to naïve mice or animals bearing 67NR non-metastatic tumor cell (Figure 3A). This increase already is evident on day 11 post tumor implant, when bone metastasis is still absent. More important, not only an increased osteoclastogenesis was observed but also a rapid and early bone loss in 4T1 tumor bearing mice was evident by histomorphometry and µCT (Figure 3, B–D). Indeed, by day 6 p.i., almost 50% of trabecular bone had been resorbed. The above results show that significant bone loss precedes bone metastatic colonization in animals bearing 4T1 tumor cells.
T cells are required for development of pre-metastatic osteolytic disease
Since metastases to the bone cavity were not found before day 16 after tumor injection and therefore cannot be responsible for the early bone loss observed, we asked whether that was actually the result of T cell pro-osteoclastogenic activity.
First we looked at T cell numbers in the draining LN and bone marrow, starting at day 11 after tumor inoculation. Although, by day 11, the relative numbers of CD3+, CD4+ and CD8+ were the same in animals bearing 4T1 or 67NR tumor cells, the absolute numbers of CD4+, but not CD8+ T cells in the BM of 4T1 positive mice were already higher than in the other groups (Figures S2A and S2B). Since these tumors are derived from BALB/c mice and MMTV positive, we checked whether this early increase in CD4 T cell numbers in the BM could be the result of superantigen stimulation. No TCRVβ skew was observed in the BM or LN of 4T1 bearing mice when compared to naïve animals (Figure S2C) indicating that no detectable superantigen stimulation is taking place.
To test if T cells were indeed responsible for the early bone loss observed, CD3+ T cells were purified from the BM of 4T1 or 67NR bearing BALB/c donor mice 11 days after tumor inoculation (one week before detection of bone cavity metastases - Figure 2A) and i.v. transferred to T cell-deficient BALB/c Nude (nude) recipients along with 4T1 sAg. After 14 days, splenocytes from recipient mice of the different groups were restimulated in vitro with sAg for 72h. Supernatants obtained from the cultures were harvested and RANKL and IL-17F levels were measured by ELISA. Production of IL-17F and RANKL was observed only in supernatant obtained from cells derived from donor mice bearing 4T1, but not 67NR, tumors (Figure 4A). In line with these results, flow cytometric analyses showed the presence of IL-17F + RANKL+ CD4 T cells in the spleen of nude mice that received cells from 4T1-bearing donors (Figure 4B); On the other hand, IL-17F + RANKL+ double positive cells were absent in the CD8+ population (Figure S4B). Also, analysis of the serum showed a low OPG/RANKL ratio (Figure 4C). Altogether, these results indicate that the T cell cytokine profile observed in the bone marrow of 4T1 and 67NR bearing mice is preserved after transfer of BM T cells to nude mice and is not dependent on the presence of live tumor cells.
Importantly, bone histomorphometry and µCT analyses showed that T cells derived from 4T1-bearing donors were capable of inducing bone loss in the presence of tumor antigens but in the absence of tumor cells (Figure 4, D and E). Of note is the fact that very early after T cell transfer, by day 6, bone loss was already evident no matter what microCT parameters were analysed (Figure S3). Similar results were obtained when pre-metastatic LN T cells were transferred into nude mice (Figure S4). In this case, the source of antigen was the 67NR cell line indicating that both, 4T1 e 67NR share the specific epitopes recognized by T cells.
T cell-induced pro-osteoclastogenic activity is dependent on RANKL expression by T cells
To understand the mechanisms involved in the pre-metastatic bone loss mediated by T cells we studied how the inhibition of IL17-F and RANKL expression in T cells would affect osteoclastogenesis. T cells were collected from LNs of 4T1 tumor bearing mice and IL17F or RANKL expression was suppressed using specific shRNA (Figure 5A). Silenced T cells were stimulated in vitro, their supernatants were harvested and tested for pro-osteoclastogenic potential using an in vitro assay. Silencing RANKL, but not IL-17F, indeed impairs osteoclastogenesis, indicating that T-cell derived RANKL plays a major role in the process (Figure 5B). Silenced T cells were also transferred to nude recipients along with tumor antigen. After 6 days post i.v. transfer, the phenotype of the transferred T cells still was maintained as shown by an in vitro osteoclastogenic assay using supernatant derived from in vitro stimulated spleen cells (Figure 5, C and D). Again, osteoclastogenesis was observed only in the presence of RANKL confirming our previous results.
Pre-metastatic osteolytic disease requires RANKL expression by T cells
Next, we evaluated if inhibition of RANKL expression in the T cells from 4T1 bearing mice (4T1 T cells) also has an impact in bone loss. RANKL knocked down T cells were transferred to nude recipients and the number of OCs present in the endosteal surface was evaluated in vivo. We found that an increase in the number of OCs was observed in nude mice receiving 4T1 T cells (4T1 T) when compared to nude recipients that did not receive 4T1 T cells and/or antigen (T Nv, sAg and No T/sAg groups) (Figure 6A and Figure S5A). However, this increase was not observed if the transferred 4T1 T cells were unable to produce RANKL. Moreover, pro-osteoclastogenic activity does not depend on the production of IL-17F (Figure 6A and Figure S5A). Bone loss is indeed observed in the absence of IL-17F but is inhibited by the absence of T cell-derived RANKL (Figure 6B and Figure S5B and C).
T cell-induced pre-metastatic osteolytic bone disease is required for metastatic colonization of the bone cavity
Our results show that T cell-derived RANKL is necessary for the induction of a pre-metastatic osteolytic disease. If osteolytic disease is a requirement for tumor establishment or bone metastasis initiation, as predicted from the vicious cycle hypothesis [15], we should be able to interfere with the bone metastatic process by inhibiting RANKL production by T cells. To test this hypothesis, RANKL expression was knocked down in 4T1T cells, and these cells were transferred to Nude recipients that were also implanted with 4T1 tumor cells in the mammary fat pad. While the primary tumor growth was only delayed in mice that did not receive any T cells or mice receiving RANKL silenced T cells (Figure S6A), the effects of RANKL knock down in lymph node and bone metastases were striking. In the absence of T cell-derived RANKL, metastasis to the LN was reduced to 5% of what was observed in the positive control group (T 4T1), while development of bone metastases was completely inhibited (Figure 6, C and D). Accordingly, bone metastases were also absent, or present in very small number (until day 28), in nude recipients that were not reconstituted with T cells (Figure 6D). This is not a consequence of a diminished primary tumor growth since metastasis to the lungs are increased in the absence of T cell derived RANKL (Figure S6B).
These results indicate that RANKL+ T cells provide help for bone, but not to lung metastasis establishment unveiling an unexpected role of T cells in promoting bone tumor spread.
Discussion
Although immune activity is classically linked to anti-tumor activity several reports were published in the past linking immunity to tumor progression [38–40]. We show here that indeed this can be the case. Using a mouse model of breast cancer, we show that RANKL production by tumor-primed CD4+ T cells is required for development of bone metastasis. We reached this conclusion by first showing that the metastatic 4T1 tumor, but not its non-metastatic 67NR sibling, induces production of pro-osteoclastogenic cytokines, including IL-17F and RANKL by CD4+ T cells. Production of such cytokines leading to OC formation and activation, and osteolytic disease, is observed even before tumor cells colonize the bone cavity, suggesting that CD4+ T cells prepare the metastatic niche for further establishment of tumor cells in the model used. Inhibition of RANKL production by tumor-primed CD4+ T cells protects mice from osteolytic disease and, surprisingly, completely abolishes the development of bone metastases. Our data is in agreement with two recent studies in the transgenic MMTV-PyMT mice, a Th2 breast cancer model [14] that does not colonize the bones. In this model, metastasis to the bones are absent whereas metastasis to the lungs where shown to be Th2 dependent. However, bone metastasis did occur after a shift in the Th response from Th2 to Th17 [41,42] corroborating the need of a specific immune phenotype to allow bone colonization.
Modulation of the T cell functional phenotype to Th17 can be reached by 4T1 tumor cells but not 67NR, although either boosting with 4T1 soluble antigen extract or 67NR tumor cells has the same effect on bone loss. This suggests that the tumor antigens recognized by T cells are shared by both tumors and that the difference in the quality of the T cell response to these two sibling cell lines is probably due to differential modulation of the immune response by the tumor cells rather than being dependent on recognition of different epitopes.
The very early and intense T cell-dependent bone loss observed, in immunocompetent mice bearing 4T1 tumor or Nudes transferred with 4T1 specific T cells, is indeed surprising. The number of T cells in the BM is low, comprising 2% or less of the total marrow cell content. Also, no skew in the distribution of TCR V families was observed in the presence of 4T1 tumor arguing against any kind of superantigen stimulation by the tumor to explain the amplitude of the osteolytic bone response. These results suggest the existence of an amplifying loop triggered by the RANKL+T cell.
Contribution of T cell-derived RANKL to bone metabolism was first proposed by Penninger and colleagues in a model of inflammatory bone disease [24]. Later studies showing reversal of RANKL dependent osteopetrosis by hiperexpression of RANKL in T and B cells [43] reinforced the interplay between T cell derived RANKL and bone homeostasis. On the other hand, T cell derived IL-17A has been claimed to be pivotal to osteoclastogenesis by upregulating RANKL expression in synoviocyte and macrophages in the inflamed joint [25,30]. No direct role for IL-17 in bone physiology or cancer induced bone disease has been reported. In the 4T1 mestastatic model, IL-17F, which shows 50% homology with IL-17A and shares its receptor [44], is produced in high level but is not necessary for the development of pre-metastatic bone disease.
In a transgenic model of breast tumor with metastasis to the lungs [45], regulatory T cell-derived RANKL has been shown to be pro-metastatic. A similar role for Tregs in our model is unlikely though. First, the number of CD4+CD25+Foxp3+ Treg cells in mice bearing metastatic and non-metastatic tumors is the same (our unpublished results). Second, the T cell cytokine profile observed in the presence of metastatic tumor is not compatible with Treg activity. Finally, Tregs have been shown to inhibit osteoclastogenesis in other model systems [37] and in periodontal disease, Treg infiltrate is present in gingivitis preceding periodontitis. When periodontitis is established and actual bone loss takes place, Tregs disappear from the site of the lesion, giving place to RANKL+ and IL-17+ T cells [44]. Altogether, these reports indicate that Tregs are not involved in cancer-induced bone disease, although they can play a role in facilitating metastasis to organs others than the bones.
Strikingly, T cell derived RANKL expression blockage inhibits the development of bone metastasis. One could argue that the effect of RANKL inhibition in bone metastasis is secondary to the effect observed in growth of the primary tumor. Indeed, direct effect of RANKL in mammary gland cells [26] has been shown as well as in tumor aggressiveness [46,47]. However, if that was the case, meaning that delayed tumor growth would be responsible for inhibition or delay of metastasis development, the prediction would be that metastasis to organs other than the bones would be also inhibited. Yet, the number of metastatic colonies in the lungs is four times higher in the absence of RANKL + T cells indicating that the overall capacity of 4T1 tumor to produce metastasis is not impaired in the absence of T cell-derived RANKL. On the contrary, the use of osteoclast inhibitors such as anti-RANKL can certainly protect the bones but might increase the risk of pulmonary metastasis when acting over T cells, a point that needs further investigation.
We believe that the characterization of T cell-induced pre-metastatic osteolytic disease adds an extra step to the vicious cycle hypothesis (Figure 7). Tumor cells are believed to establish themselves in the BM through mechanisms that culminate in the release of growth factors from the bone matrix as a consequence of osteoclast activity. Here, we suggest that in the presence of metastatic tumors, antigen-specific T cells are primed and acquire a pro-osteoclastogenenic phenotype. Following their migratory pattern, tumor-specific primed T cells expressing RANKL migrate to the bone cavity, before tumor cells colonize it, and once there they stimulate the differentiation and activation of OCs. Pre-metastatic T cell mediated bone consumption generates a rich environment that will allow the colonization of the bone cavity by the metastatic clones. Once initial seeding of the bone tissue is achieved, the tumor cells can continue the osteolytic process on their own, feeding themselves through the vicious cycle established with the bone microenvironment.
Altogether, our results unveil an uncommon perspective of tissue-specific immune activation leading to progression of cancer and identify T cells as a major player in pre-metastatic osteolytic disease and development of bone metastasis.
Supporting Information
Acknowledgments
JPM is a PEW fellow in the Biomedical Sciences, ACM is a PDS CNPq fellow. We thank Cinthya Sternberg and Alex Balduíno for critical reading of the manuscript; Maria Bellio and Polly Matzinger for criticisms and suggestions; Ana Paula Lima for help with the transfections; Romulo Areal Braga for help with the schematic model and Ana Paula Alves for technical assistance.
Funding Statement
This work was supported by CNPq grants 57.3806/2008- INCT, 306624/2010-9, FAPERJ grants #E-26/111.423/2010; E-26/110.949/2008; E-26/110.323/2010 and Swiss Bridge Foundation # 2301500. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
References
- 1. Schreiber RD, Old LJ, Smyth MJ (2011) Cancer immunoediting: integrating immunity’s roles in cancer suppression and promotion. Science 331: 1565-1570. doi:10.1126/science.1203486. PubMed: 21436444. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Old LJ, Boyse EA (1964) Immunology of experimental tumors. Annu Rev Med 15: 167-186. doi:10.1146/annurev.me.15.020164.001123. PubMed: 14139934. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Matsushita H, Vesely MD, Koboldt DC, Rickert CG, Uppaluri R et al. (2012) Cancer exome analysis reveals a T-cell-dependent mechanism of cancer immunoediting.Nature 482:400-404 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 4. DuPage M, Mazumdar C, Schmidt LM, Cheung AF, Jacks T (2012) Expression of tumour-specific antigens underlies cancer immunoediting. Nature 482: 405-409. doi:10.1038/nature10803. PubMed: 22318517. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Hanahan D, Weinberg RA (2011) Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation. Cell 144: 646-674. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2011.02.013. PubMed: 21376230. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Zitvogel L, Tesniere A, Kroemer G (2006) Cancer despite immunosurveillance: immunoselection and immunosubversion. Nat Rev Immunol 6: 715-727. doi:10.1038/nri1936. PubMed: 16977338. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Bissell MJ, Hines WC (2011) Why don’t we get more cancer? A proposed role of the microenvironment in restraining cancer progression. Nat Med 17: 320-329. doi:10.1038/nm.2328. PubMed: 21383745. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Duda DG, Duyverman AM, Kohno M, Snuderl M, Steller EJ et al. (2010) Malignant cells facilitate lung metastasis by bringing their own soil. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107: 21677-21682. doi:10.1073/pnas.1016234107. PubMed: 21098274. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Peinado H, Alečković M, Lavotshkin S, Matei I, Costa-Silva B et al. (2012) Melanoma exosomes educate bone marrow progenitor cells toward a pro-metastatic phenotype through MET. Nat Med 18: 883-891. doi:10.1038/nm.2753. PubMed: 22635005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Fidler IJ (2003) The pathogenesis of cancer metastasis: the 'seed and soil' hypothesis revisited. Nat Rev Cancer 3: 453-458. doi:10.1038/nrc1098. PubMed: 12778135. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Pardoll DM (2012) The blockade of immune checkpoints in cancer immunotherapy. Nat Rev Cancer 12: 252-264. doi:10.1038/nrc3239. PubMed: 22437870. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Joyce JA, Pollard JW (2009) Microenvironmental regulation of metastasis. Nat Rev Cancer 9: 239-252. doi:10.1038/nrc2618. PubMed: 19279573. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. DeNardo DG, Brennan DJ, Rexhepaj E, Ruffell B, Shiao SL et al. (2011) Leukocyte complexity predicts breast cancer survival and functionally regulates response to chemotherapy. Cancer Discov 1: 54-67. doi:10.1158/2159-8274.CD -10-0028. PubMed; : 22039576 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. DeNardo DG, Barreto JB, Andreu P, Vasquez L, Tawfik D et al. (2009) CD4(+) T cells regulate pulmonary metastasis of mammary carcinomas by enhancing protumor properties of macrophages. Cancer Cell 16: 91-102. doi:10.1016/j.ccr.2009.06.018. PubMed: 19647220. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Mundy GR (2002) Metastasis to bone: causes, consequences and therapeutic opportunities. Nat Rev Cancer 2: 584-593. doi:10.1038/nrc867. PubMed: 12154351. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Roodman GD (2004) Mechanisms of bone metastasis. N Engl J Med 350: 1655–1664. doi:10.1056/NEJMra030831. PubMed: 15084698. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Noonan K, Marchionni L, Anderson J, Pardoll D, Roodman GD et al. (2010) A novel role of IL-17-producing lymphocytes in mediating lytic bone disease in multiple myeloma. Blood 116: 3554-3563. doi:10.1182/blood-2010-05-283895. PubMed: 20664052. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Fournier PG, Chirgwin JM, Guise TA (2006) New insights into the role of T cells in the vicious cycle of bone metastases. Curr Opin Rheumatol 18: 396–404. doi:10.1097/01.bor.0000231909.35043.da. PubMed: 16763461. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Monteiro JP, Benjamin A, Costa ES, Barcinski MA, Bonomo A (2005) Normal hematopoiesis is maintained by activated bone marrow CD4+ T cells. Blood 105: 1484-1491. doi:10.1182/blood-2004-07-2856. PubMed: 15514013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Fujisaki J, Wu J, Carlson AL, Silberstein L, Putheti P et al. (2011) In vivo imaging of Treg cells providing immune privilege to the haematopoietic stem-cell niche. Nature 474: 216-219. doi:10.1038/nature10160. PubMed: 21654805. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Shiozawa Y, Pedersen EA, Havens AM, Jung Y, Mishra A et al. (2011) Human prostate cancer metastases target the hematopoietic stem cell niche to establish footholds in mouse bone marrow. J Clin Invest 121: 1298-1312. doi:10.1172/JCI43414. PubMed: 21436587. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Di Rosa F F (2009) T-lymphocyte interaction with stromal, bone and hematopoietic cells in the bone marrow. Immunol Cell Biol 87: 20–29. doi:10.1038/icb.2008.84. PubMed: 19030018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Wong BR, Josien R, Choi Y (1999) TRANCE is a TNF family member that regulates dendritic cell and osteoclast function. J Leukoc Biol 65: 715-724. PubMed: 10380891. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Kong YY, Feige U, Sarosi I, Bolon B, Tafuri A et al. (1999) Activated T cells regulate bone loss and joint destruction in adjuvant arthritis through osteoprotegerin ligand. Nature 402: 304-309. doi:10.1038/46303. PubMed: 10580503. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Takayanagi H (2009) Osteoimmunology and the effects of the immune system on bone. Nat Rev Rheumatol 5: 667-676. doi:10.1038/nrrheum.2009.217. PubMed: 19884898. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Fata JE, Kong YY, Li J, Sasaki T, Irie-Sasaki J et al. (2000) The osteoclast differentiation factor osteoprotegerin-ligand is essential for mammary gland development. Cell 103: 41-50. doi:10.1016/S0092-8674(00)00103-3. PubMed: 11051546. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Dougall WC, Glaccum M, Charrier K, Rohrbach K, Brasel K et al. (1999) RANK is essential for osteoclast and lymph node development. Genes Dev 13: 2412-2424. doi:10.1101/gad.13.18.2412. PubMed: 10500098. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Nakashima T, Hayashi M, Fukunaga T, Kurata K, Oh-Hora M et al. (2011) Evidence for osteocyte regulation of bone homeostasis through RANKL expression. Nat Med 17: 1231-1234. doi:10.1038/nm.2452. PubMed: 21909105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Xiong J, Onal M, Jilka RL, Weinstein RS, Manolagas SC et al. (2011) Matrix-embedded cells control osteoclast formation. Nat Med 17: 1235-1241. doi:10.1038/nm.2448. PubMed: 21909103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Sato K, Suematsu A, Okamoto K, Yamaguchi A, Morishita Y et al. (2006) Th17 functions as an osteoclastogenic helper T cell subset that links T cell activation and bone destruction. J Exp Med 203: 2673-2682. doi:10.1084/jem.20061775. PubMed: 17088434. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Pöllinger B, Junt T, Metzler B, Walker UA, Tyndall A et al. (2011) Th17 cells, not IL-17+ γδ T cells, drive arthritic bone destruction in mice and humans. J Immunol 186: 2602-2612. doi:10.4049/jimmunol.1003370. PubMed: 21217016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Genovese MC, Van den Bosch F, Roberson SA, Bojin S, Biagini IM et al. (2010) LY2439821, a humanized anti-interleukin-17 monoclonal antibody, in the treatment of patients with rheumatoid arthritis: A phase I randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, proof-of-concept study. Arthritis Rheum 62: 929-939. doi:10.1002/art.27334. PubMed: 20131262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Aslakson CJ, Miller FR (1992) Selective events in the metastatic process defined by analysis of the sequential dissemination of subpopulations of a mouse mammary tumor. Cancer Res 52: 1399-1405. PubMed: 1540948. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Suzuki C, Jacobsson H, Hatschek T, Torkzad MR, Bodén K et al. (2008) Radiologic measurements of tumor response to treatment: practical approaches and limitations. RadioGraphics 28: 329-344. doi:10.1148/rg.282075068. PubMed: 18349443. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Lelekakis M, Moseley JM, Martin TJ, Hards D, Williams E et al. (1999) A novel orthotopic model of breast cancer metastasis to bone. Clin Exp Metastasis 17: 163-170. doi:10.1023/A:1006689719505. PubMed: 10411109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Gao Y, Grassi F, Ryan MR, Terauchi M, Page K et al. (2007) IFN-gamma stimulates osteoclast formation and bone loss in vivo via antigen-driven T cell activation. J Clin Invest 117: 122-132. doi:10.1172/JCI30074. PubMed: 17173138. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Zaiss MM, Axmann R, Zwerina J, Polzer K, Gückel E et al. (2007) Treg cells suppress osteoclast formation: a new link between the immune system and bone. Arthritis Rheum 56: 4104-4112. doi:10.1002/art.23138. PubMed: 18050211. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Hirsch HM, Iversen I (1961) Accelerated development of spontaneous mammary tumors in mice pretreated with mammary tumor tissue and adjuvant. Cancer Res 21: 752-760. PubMed: 13714571. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Martinez C (1964) EFFECT OF EARLY THYMECTOMY ON DEVELOPMENT OF MAMMARY TUMOURS IN MICE. Nature 203: 1188. doi:10.1038/2031188a0. PubMed: 14213682. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Yunis EJ, Martinez C, Smith J, Stutman O, Good RA (1969) Spontaneous mammary adenocarcinoma in mice: influence of thymectomy and reconstitution with thymus grafts or spleen cells. Cancer Res 29: 174-178. PubMed: 4303909. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Roy LD, Ghosh S, Pathangey LB, Tinder TL, Gruber HE et al. (2011) Collagen induced arthritis increases secondary metastasis in MMTV-PyV MT mouse model of mammary cancer. BMC Cancer 11: 365-384. doi:10.1186/1471-2407-11-365. PubMed: 21859454. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Jovanovic I, Radosavljevic G, Mitrovic M, Juranic VL, McKenzie AN et al. (2011) ST2 deletion enhances innate and acquired immunity to murine mammary carcinoma. Eur J Immunol 41: 1902-1912. doi:10.1002/eji.201141417. PubMed: 21484786. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Kim N, Odgren PR, Kim DK, Marks SC Jr, Choi Y (2000) Diverse roles of the tumor necrosis factor family member TRANCE in skeletal physiology revealed by TRANCE deficiency and partial rescue by a lymphocyte-expressed TRANCE transgene. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 97: 10905-10910. doi:10.1073/pnas.200294797. PubMed: 10984520. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Ernst CW, Lee JE, Nakanishi T, Karimbux NY, Rezende TM et al. (2009) Diminished forkhead box P3/CD25 double-positive T regulatory cells are associated with the increased nuclear factor-kB ligand (RANKL+) T cells in bone resorption lesion of periodontal disease. Clin Exp Immunol 148: 271–280. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Tan W, Zhang W, Strasner A, Grivennikov S, Cheng JQ et al. (2011) Tumour-infiltrating regulatory T cells stimulate mammary cancer metastasis through RANKL-RANK signalling. Nature 470: 548-553. doi:10.1038/nature09707. PubMed: 21326202. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Schramek D, Leibbrandt A, Sigl V, Kenner L, Pospisilik JA et al. (2010) Osteoclast differentiation factor RANKL controls development of progestin-driven mammary cancer. Nature 468: 98-102. doi:10.1038/nature09387. PubMed: 20881962. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Palafox M, Ferrer I, Pellegrini P, Vila S, Hernandez-Ortega S et al. (2012) RANK Induces Epithelial–Mesenchymal Transition and Stemness in Human Mammary Epithelial Cells and Promotes Tumorigenesis and Metastasis. Cancer Res 72: 2879-2888. doi:10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-12-0044. PubMed: 22496457. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.