Abstract
Tripartite motif (TRIM) proteins constitute a family of over 100 members that share conserved tripartite motifs and exhibit diverse biological functions. Several TRIM proteins have been shown to restrict viral infections and regulate host cellular innate immune responses. In order to identify TRIM proteins that modulate the infection of hepatitis B virus (HBV), we tested 38 human TRIMs for their effects on HBV gene expression, capsid assembly and DNA synthesis in human hepatoma cells (HepG2). The study revealed that ectopic expression of 8 TRIM proteins in HepG2 cells potently reduced the amounts of secreted HBV surface and e antigens as well as intracellular capsid and capsid DNA. Mechanistic analyses further demonstrated that the 8 TRIMs not only reduced the expression of HBV mRNAs, but also inhibited HBV enhancer I and enhancer II activities. Studies focused on TRIM41 revealed that a HBV DNA segment spanning nucleotide 1638 to nucleotide 1763 was essential for TRIM41-mediated inhibition of HBV enhancer II activity and the inhibitory effect depended on the E3 ubiquitin ligase activity of TRIM41 as well as the integrity of TRIM41 C-terminal domain. Moreover, knockdown of endogenous TRIM41 in a HepG2-derived stable cell line significantly increased the level of HBV preC/C RNA, leading to an increase in viral core protein, capsid and capsid DNA. Our studies have thus identified eight TRIM proteins that are able to inhibit HBV transcription and provided strong evidences suggesting the endogenous role of TRIM41 in regulating HBV transcription in human hepatoma cells.
Introduction
Tripartite motif (TRIM) proteins are RING-type E3 ligases. These proteins share a conserved N-terminal structure consisting of a RING finger domain, one or two B boxes, a putative coiled-coil domain, and a variable C terminus. Based on the structure of C terminus, the TRIM family members can be divided into 11 groups [1]. TRIMs are ubiquitously expressed in many tissues and organs, and involved in a variety of cellular processes, including innate and adaptive immune responses [2]–[4]. Several TRIM proteins are interferon (IFN) inducible and can restrict viral infections [5]. TRIM5α, being one of the most highly implicated TRIM family proteins in cell-intrinsic antiviral immunity, restricts the infection of various retroviruses, such as human immunodeficiency virus 1 (HIV-1) and murine leukemia virus (MLV) [6]–[8]. In addition, TRIM28 is critical for the silencing of endogenous retroviruses in embryonic stem cells [9]. TRIM79α inhibits Tick-borne encephalitis virus replication by degrading the viral RNA polymerase [10]. TRIM22 inhibits the transcriptional activities of hepatitis B virus (HBV) core promoter and HIV-1 LTR [11], [12]. TRIM56 restricts the infection of bovine viral diarrhea virus via interaction with the viral N-terminal protease [13]. Moreover, a screen of 55 human and mouse TRIM proteins identified more than 20 TRIMs that inhibited the early or late events of HIV-1 and/or MLV replication cycle [14].
Besides serving as effectors of innate antiviral immune response, multiple TRIMs also regulate the pattern recognition receptor (PRR) signal transduction pathways and thus indirectly modulate viral infection and viral pathogenesis [2], [4]. For instance, TRIM21 negatively regulates the activation of NFκB and IRF3/7 induced by multiple toll-like receptors (TLRs) and RIG-I-like receptors (RLRs) [15]. Lys 63-linked ubiquitination of RIG-I by TRIM25 is essential for optimal induction of RIG-I-mediated IFN response [16]. TRIM30α negatively regulates TLR-mediated NFκB activation by targeting TAB2 and TAB3 for lysosomal degradation [17]. TRIM56 facilitates TLR3 ligand and cytoplasmic double-stranded DNA stimulated IFN induction by interaction with TRIF and ubiquitination of STING, respectively [18], [19]. Recently, a systematic screening of all 75 known human TRIMs revealed that approximately one half of the 75 TRIM-family members enhanced the innate immune response and that they did this at multiple levels in signaling pathways [20]. Moreover, Uchil and colleagues identified 16 TRIM proteins that induced NFκB and/or AP-1. Particularly, TRIM62 was shown to be essential for TRIF-mediated late NFκB, AP-1, and interferon production following lipopolysaccharide stimulation. Interestingly, most TRIM proteins previously identified to inhibit MLV demonstrated an ability to induce NFκB/AP-1 [21].
Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is a major public health problem. Currently, it has been estimated that 350 million people worldwide are chronically infected with HBV. Approximately one-third of these individuals will die from serious liver diseases, such as cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma and liver failure, if left untreated [22]. Because HBV infection of hepatocytes induces negligible cytopathic effects, it is generally believed that the outcome of HBV infection and severity of its associated liver diseases are determined by the nature and strength of host innate and adaptive immune responses against the virus [23], [24]. Furthermore, alpha interferon (IFN-α) is approved by administrative authorities for treatment of chronic hepatitis B. Pegylated IFN-α is effective in achieving a sustained virological response, which is defined by hepatitis e antigen (HBeAg) seroconversion and/or HBV DNA levels below 20,000 copies/ml at 6 months after completion of the therapy, in about 30% of HBeAg-positive and 40% of HBeAg-negative cases [25]–[27]. The antiviral mechanisms of the cytokine and the reasons for the differential therapeutic response among the treated patients remain to be elucidated.
In order to investigate the role of TRIM proteins in HBV replication, host innate antiviral response and pathogenesis, 38 human TRIMs were tested in a human hepatocyte-derived cell line for their ability to modulate HBV replication. The study revealed that ectopic expression of 8 TRIMs significantly suppressed HBV transcription. In particular, TRIM41 specifically inhibited the transcription of HBV, which depended on TRIM41 E3 ubiquitin ligase activity as well as the integrity of TRIM41 C-terminal region, but it did not inhibit immediate early promoter activity of cytomegalovirus. Moreover, endogenous TRIM41 plays a role in regulation of HBV transcription in human hepatoma cells. Our study has thus identified TRIMs that inhibit HBV replication and supported the notion that TRIM family proteins serve as innate immune components to shape viral pathogenesis.
Results
Identification of TRIM Proteins that Modulate HBV Replication in Human Hepatocyte-derived Cells
In order to systematically investigate the role of TRIM proteins in HBV replication and innate antiviral immune response, 38 plasmids expressing individual TRIMs were purchased from the indicated commercial sources (Table S1). To evaluate the effects of ectopic expression of individual TRIMs on HBV replication in human hepatocytes, HepG2 cells were co-transfected with a plasmid containing 1.3 fold unit-length of HBV genomic DNA (pHBV1.3) and a plasmid expressing a specific TRIM or vector plasmid (pcDNA3.1). The culture media and cells were harvested three days post transfection. Secreted HBV surface antigen (HBsAg) and e antigen (HBeAg) in culture media were quantified by ELISA. The amounts of intracellular capsid and capsid DNA intermediates were measured by a native agarose gel-based particle gel assay [28]. The amount of secreted alpha fetal protein (AFP) was determined by ELISA and served as a control for hepatoma cell-specific gene expression. Viability of the transfected cells was determined by using a CCK-8 kit. As shown in Fig. 1, while ectopic expression of any of the 38 individual TRIMs in HepG2 cells did not apparently affect the cell viability (Fig. S1) and secretion of AFP was only modestly reduced in cells transfected with plasmids expressing TRIM 26, 31 or 41 (Fig. 1), expression of TRIM5, 6, 11, 14, 25, 26, 31 or 41 reduced the amounts of secreted HBsAg and HBeAg by more than 2 folds. Moreover, the particle-gel assay revealed that the same eight TRIMs also significantly reduced the amounts of intracellular capsid and capsid DNA. Interestingly, in contradiction to a previous report which showed that TRIM22 inhibited HBV gene transcription in human hepatoma cells [11], our study did not reveal any significant effect of TRIM22 on HBV protein expression and DNA replication (Fig. 1), which is, in fact, consistent with a recent report by Mao and colleagues [30]. Proper expression of TRIM22 and other eight active TRIM proteins had been confirmed by quantitative RT-PCR assays and/or Western blot analyses (Fig. S2). The simultaneous reduction of the multiple HBV gene products in cells ectopically expressing each of the eight TRIMs implies that these TRIM proteins most likely suppressed viral RNA transcription and/or promoted viral RNA decay. Alternatively, it is also possible that some of the TRIMs may selectively inhibited viral mRNA translation.
Eight TRIM Proteins Efficiently Reduced the Amount of HBV mRNA
To rule out the possibility that these TRIMs selectively inhibited viral mRNA translation, HBV preC/C RNA and total mRNA were quantified in HepG2 cells co-transfected with pHBV1.3 and a plasmid expressing one of the eight active TRIMs or vector plasmid (pcDNA3.1). As shown in Fig. 2, all the eight TRIMs significantly reduced the amounts of intracellular viral preC/C RNA and total viral mRNA, suggesting that these TRIMs most likely inhibit HBV transcription and/or promote the decay of the viral RNA.
All of the Eight TRIMs Efficiently Inhibited the Transcriptional Activity of HBV Enhancer I and Enhancer II/core Promoter
HBV transcribes four groups of viral RNA, including 3.5 kb pre-core/core RNAs, 2.4 kb RNA for large envelope protein (L) and 2.1 kb RNAs for middle (M) and small (S) envelope protein and 0.7 kb RNA for X protein, under the control of four promoters and two enhancers, enhancers I and II (Enh I and Enh II) [31], [32]. To examine whether the TRIM-induced reduction of viral RNAs is due to the inhibition of viral gene transcription, effects of the eight TRIMs on HBV Enh I and Enh II/core promoter (Enh II/Cp) activity were determined by reporter assays in HepG2 cells. Briefly, pGL-4.10 HBV Enh I or Enh II/Cp driven firefly luciferase and pCMV-IE renilla luciferase were co-transfected with a plasmid expressing one of the eight TRIMs or vector control into HepG2 cells. As shown in Fig. 3, expression of TRIMs 5, 6, 11, 14, 26, or 31 efficiently inhibited the transcriptional activity of HBV Enh I and II, as well as CMV IE promoter. On the contrary, expression of TRIM25 only inhibited HBV Enh II/Cp, but not HBV Enh I and CMV IE promoter. Interestingly, TRIM41 significantly suppressed both HBV Enh I and Enh II/Cp without obvious inhibition of CMV IE promoter activity. Due to its strong and selective inhibition on HBV transcription, our subsequent studies were focused on TRIM41.
Inhibition of Transcription is the Primary Effect of TRIM41 in HBV Genome Replication
In order to further corroborate the effect of TRIM41 on HBV replication with its inhibition of viral RNA transcription, a dose dependent experiment was performed. Briefly, as shown in Fig. 4, fixed amount of pHBV1.3 plasmid was co-transfected with control vector or the indicated amounts of the plasmid expressing TRIM41. Transfected cells were harvested three days post transfection. The amounts of the HBV preC/C RNAs and total viral mRNA were determined by a quantitative RT-PCR assay (Fig. 4A) and all four species of HBV mRNA were also detected by Northern blot hybridization (Fig. 4E). The intracellular core protein was quantified with an immunoblot assay. The capsid and capsid DNA levels were determined by a particle gel assay and/or Southern blot hybridization (Fig. 4B & F). Consistent with the results presented in Figs. 1 and 2, TRIM41 dose-dependently reduced the amounts of viral RNAs. Interestingly, the amounts of viral core protein, capsid and capsid DNA were also proportionally decreased with viral RNAs, implying that the changes of other viral products (or replication intermediates) are the consequence of viral RNA reduction. Hence, the results support the notion that inhibition of HBV transcription is the primary antiviral effect of TRIM41.
Identification of cis Elements and Transcription Factors Essential for TRIM41 to Inhibit Enh II/Cp Transcription Activity
In order to understand how TRIM41 inhibits HBV Enh II/Cp activity, the Enh II/Cp sequence was divided into three fragments (Fig. 5A) and cloned into pGL4.10 to study the expression of firefly luciferase. The effects of TRIM41 and other seven TRIMs on the transcriptional activity of each of the three fragments were tested in the same way as that for full-length Enh II/Cp. As shown in Fig. 5, while TRIM 5, 6, 11, 14, 25, 26, and 31 significantly suppressed the transcriptional activities of all three fragments, TRIM41 specifically inhibited the transcriptional activity of HBV Enh II/Cp Fragment 2. The results thus imply that TRIM41 either directly interacts with the cis–elements within the DNA fragment spanning nucleotides 1638 to 1763 or modulate the abundance and/or function of transcription factors bound to this region.
Several transcription factors, such as HNF3-β, RXR-α and PPAR-α, were shown be critical in regulating the activity of the HBV Enh II/Cp fragment 2 [33]–[35]. Hence, the observed inhibition of HBV Enh II/Cp by TRIM41 may be the consequence of TRIM41-induced alteration of abundance and/or function of these three transcription factors. Indeed, as shown in Fig. S3A, ectopic expression of each of the three transcription factors modulated the transcription activity of Enh II/Cp fragment 2. Consistent with the previous observation that HNF3-β inhibits HBV transcription in a transgenic mice model in vivo [36], over-expression of HNF3-β significantly inhibited the transcriptional activity of Enh II/Cp fragment 2(Fig. S3A). On the contrary, expression of either RXR-α or PPAR-α significantly enhanced the luciferase expression driven by Enh II/Cp Fragment 2 (Fig. S3A). Interestingly, expression of TRIM41 completely attenuated the activation of transcriptional activity of Enh II/Cp Fragment 2 resulting from ectopically expressed RXR-α or PPAR-α. To obtain additional mechanistic insight, we determined the effects of TRIM41 on the abundance of RXR-α or PPAR-α. The results shown in Fig. S3B demonstrated that expression of TRIM41 did not reduce the amounts of the two transcription factors. Hence, the results presented herein indicate that TRIM41 inhibition of HBV Enh II/Cp transcription is most likely not through down-regulation of the levels of transcription factors RXR-α or PPAR-α in hepatocytes.
The E3 Ubiquitin Ligase Activity of TRIM41 is Required for Inhibition of HBV Transcription
The N-terminus of TRIM41 is comprised of three conserved domains, including a RING finger domain, a B box domain, and a coiled coil domain. The C-terminus contains a PRY-SPRY domain. In order to determine whether the E3 ligase activity is essential for TRIM41 to inhibit HBV transcription, two key cysteine residues 35 and 40 in the RING finger domain essential for the E3 ubiquitin ligase activity were mutated to alanine, which yielded mutants TRIM41C35A and TRIM41C40A, respectively [37]–[39]. In addition, a TRIM mutant with a deletion of the entire C-terminal PRY-SPRY domain was constructed and designated as TRIM41ΔC. As shown in Fig 6, expression of the three TRIM41 mutants could be readily detected by Western blot assay in the lysates of transfected cells (Fig. 6A) and by immunofluorescent analysis in transfected cells (Fig. 6B). TRIM41 wild-type and mutants predominantly localized in the cytoplasm. However, in agreement with the results presented above, while wild-type TRIM41 efficiently inhibited both Enh I and Enh II/Cp activities, TRIM41C35A and TRIM41C40A did not affect the transcriptional activities of neither HBV enhancers (Figs. 6C and D). The results thus suggest that the putative ubiquitin E3 ligase activity is essential for TRIM41 to regulate HBV transcription. However, it was very interesting to observe that TRIM41ΔC significantly inhibited the transcriptional activity of Enh I, but not Enh II (Figs. 6C and D), suggesting that the integrity of the C-terminal PRY-SPRY domain is essential for TRIM41 to suppress Enh II transcription, but dispensable for regulation of Enh I.
Endogenous TRIM41 in HepG2.2.15 Cells Suppresses HBV Transcription
Aforementioned transcriptional regulatory effects of TRIM41 on HBV were demonstrated via ectopic expression of the protein in hepatoma cells. In agreement with these results, we further demonstrated that reducing the ectopically expressed TRIM41 by small interfering RNA (siRNA) in the HepG2 cells co-transfected with pHBV1.3 and plasmid expressing TRIM41 significantly increased the amounts of HBV core protein, capsid and capsid DNA (Fig. 7A). To substantiate the pathobiological function of TRIM41 in HBV infection, we tested if endogenous TRIM41 played a role in modulating viral replication. TRIM41 expression was knocked down by siRNA in HepG2.2.15 cells that harbored an integrated head-to-tail dimmer of HBV genome and supported stable HBV replication [40]. As shown in Fig. 7B, each of the three siRNAs targeting TRIM41 efficiently reduced the amounts of TRIM41 mRNA and protein in HepG 2.2.15 cells, albeit at a different efficiency. Interestingly, the increase in HBV preC/C mRNA was observed to positively correlate with the extent of TRIM41 reduction in siRNA transfected cells (Fig. 7C). As a consequence, the amounts of viral core protein, capsid and capsid DNA also proportionally increased in the cells where TRIM41 level was down-regulated (Fig. 7D). These results thus strongly suggest that endogenously expressed TRIM41 in hepatoma cells indeed suppresses HBV replication.
Discussion
Due to the lack of convenient cell culture systems supporting efficient HBV infection, HBV replication is mainly investigated in human hepatoma cells transfected with HBV genomes. Obviously, only the post entry events of HBV replication can be studied in transfected cells. Using the HBV genome transiently transfected cell culture system, we identified eight members of TRIM family proteins that significantly reduced all the viral gene products, including viral mRNA, protein, capsid and capsid DNA, upon ectopic expression in HepG2 cells (Figs. 1 and 2). Furthermore, all the eight TRIMs were demonstrated to be able to inhibit the transcriptional activities of HBV Enh I and/or Enh II/Cp in HepG2 cells (Fig. 3).
However, based on their differential effects on HBV Enh I, Enh II/Cp and CMV IE promoter, the eight TRIMs can be categorized into two groups. Group I includes six TRIMs: TRIM 5, 6, 11, 14, 26 and 31. Each TRIM inhibited the HBV Enh I, Enh II/Cp and CMV IE promoter-driven luciferase expression to a similar extent (Fig. 3). Analysis of both HBV enhancer II and CMV IE promoter indicates that the two transcriptional regulatory DNA fragments share binding sites of several transcription factors, which may mediate the transcriptional suppression of this group of TRIMs in both promoters. Alternatively, these TRIMs may target host’s general transcription regulatory proteins, such as histone modification enzymes, epigenetic readers and transcription co-activators, to alter the transcription of a broad spectrum of host and viral genes [41]. Group II includes TRIM25 and TRIM41, which selectively inhibited HBV enhancers, but not CMV IE promoter (Fig. 3). Specifically, TRIM25 slightly enhanced the transcriptional activity of CMV IE promoter and selectively inhibited the transcriptional activity of HBV Enh II/Cp, but not Enh I. TRIM25 can be induced by estrogen and IFN-α and is involved in diverse cellular functions (Fig. S4) [42], [43]. Estrogen suppresses HBV replication and is a host factor contributing to lower HBV titers in women [44], [45]. Mechanistically, it was demonstrated that estrogen receptor-α squelched HNF4-α binding to HBV enhancer I [46]. Its estrogen inducible expression and HBV transcriptional inhibition activity suggest that TRIM25 may also play a role in estrogen suppression of HBV infection. Moreover, TRIM25 is not only an IFN-stimulatedgene, but also an essential component of RLR-driven IFN response [16]. Therefore, TRIM25 may play an important role in restricting HBV infection through both direct inhibition of HBV transcription and induction of RLR-driven antiviral responses [47]. However, although ectopic expression of TRIM25 inhibited HBV Enh II/Cp activity and restricted the viral replication, knockdown of endogenous TRIM25 in HepG2.2.15 cells did not apparently alter the abundance of HBV mRNA and other viral replication intermediates (data not shown). TRIM41 has been reported to localize in the cytoplasm and nucleus, and it can induce the degradation PKC-α through proteasome pathway [37], [38]. In this study, we demonstrated that it did not alter the transcriptional activity of CMV IE promoter, but efficiently suppressed the transcriptional activities of both Enh I and Enh II/Cp. Mechanistic analyses further indicated that a HBV DNA segment spanning nt 1638 to 1763 was essential for TRIM41 to inhibit HBV enhancer II activity and the inhibitory effect depended on TRIM41 E3 ubiquitin ligase activity as well as the integrity of TRIM41 C-terminal region. However, the C-terminal region of TRIM41 was not essential for inhibition of HBV Enh I activity, suggesting that the protein regulates HBV Enh I and II via distinct mechanisms. Knockdown of endogenous TRIM41 expression in a HepG2.2.15 cells significantly increased the levels of HBV preC/C RNA and consequentially, the viral core protein, capsid and capsid DNA were also increased. These results thus unambiguously demonstrated that endogenous TRIM41 plays a role in regulation of HBV transcription in human hepatoma cells.
Inflammatory cytokines are important mediators of host innate and adaptive immune responses and are essential for the resolution of HBV infection [48]–[54]. Particularly, IFNs are the primary antiviral cytokines that inhibit HBV transcription and reduce the amount of pgRNA-containing nucleocapsids [30], [55], [56]. Induction of TRIM5, 6, 25, 26 and 31 expression by IFN-α and/or IFN-γ in human hepatocytes may partially contribute to the suppression of HBV transcription by the cytokines (Fig. S4 and S5). In addition, two independent studies showed that IFN-induced reduction of pgRNA-containing nucleocapsids required proteasome activity [57], [58], suggesting that ubiquitination and proteasome-mediated cellular processes may be involved in the antiviral activity of IFNs. However, among the 38 TRIMs tested, none of TRIMs reduced the amount of viral DNA without reducing the amount of viral mRNA, suggesting that none of the tested TRIMs directly targets HBV nucleocapsid assembly process or stability. In addition to IFNs, TNF-α also inhibits both HBV Enh II/Cp and CMV IE promoter activities in hepatoma cells (Fig. S5). Interestingly, TNF-α can induce TRIM31 expression in both HepG2 and Huh7 cells. It is thus possible that TRIM31 may play a role in TNF-α induced suppression of HBV and CMV transcription. Ironically, IL-1β is a more potent TRIM31 inducer than TNF-α, but is a weaker inhibitor of HBV Enh II/Cp and modest stimulator of CMV promoter in HepG2 and Huh7 cells (Fig. S4 and S5). The apparent contradictive observations imply that the biological consequence of a given TRIM protein’s function is circumstantially modulated in different cellular processes.
In conclusion, through a systematic screen of 38 human TRIM proteins, we identified 8 TRIMs that efficiently suppressed HBV transcription. They may play a role in modulating HBV replication under certain pathophysiological conditions. Particularly, we provide strong evidences, which suggest that endogenously expressed TRIM41 modulates HBV gene expression in human hepatocyte-derived cells and thus may play a role in HBV pathogenesis in vivo.
Materials and Methods
Cell Culture
The human hepatoma derived cell lines HepG2 and Huh7 (Purchased from ATCC) were cultured in DMEM/F12 (Invitrogen) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (Invitrogen), 2 mM L-glutamine, 100 U/ml penicillin, and 100 µg/ml streptomycin at 37°C under humidified air containing 5% CO2. As for HepG2.2.15 (Purchased from Aybio Shanghai, China), 300 µg/ml geneticin (Invitrogen), 1% DMSO was added to DMEM/F12 (Gibco) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (Invitrogen), 2 mM L-glutamine, 100 U/ml pencillin, and 100 µg/ml streptomycin.
Plasmid Construction
pHBV1.3, which is kindly provided by Dr. Qiang Deng in Pasteur Institute of Shanghai, contains 1.3-fold over length HBV genomic sequence. HNF3-β was cloned into pcDNA3.1(+). HBV Enh I (spanning nucleotide 686 to nucleotide 1359 of HBV genome), HBV Enh II (spanning nucleotide 1548 to nucleotide 1831 of HBV genome), HBV Enh II-1(spanning nucleotide 1548 to nucleotide 1677 of HBV genome), HBV Enh II-2(spanning nucleotide 1638 to nucleotide 1767 of HBV genome) and HBV Enh II-3(spanning nucleotide 1727 to nucleotide 1831 of HBV genome) were cloned into pGL-4.10 after digestion with KpnI and XhoI. pCMV Renilla luciferase was purchased from Genescript, and the renilla luciferase was cloned into pGL4.10 basic with CMV as its promoter. Information for plasmids expressing individual TRIM proteins is provided in Table S1.
Transient Transfection and RNA Interference
One day before transfection, cells were trypsinized and seeded onto plates, 1×105/well in 12 well plates or 0.5×105/well in 24 well plates. Before transfection, the media in the plates were changed with those without antibiotics. In plasmid transfection, X-TREMEGENE HP DNA transfection reagent (Roche) was used, while in siRNA transfection, Lipofectamine RNAiMAX (Invitrogen) was used. One day after transfection, the media were changed those containing antibiotics. TRIM41 siRNAs were purchased from Ambion, and a final concentration of 15 nM was used for the transfection of HepG2.2.15.
ELISA
Culture medium was diluted 1∶30 for HBeAg or 1∶3 HBsAg in PBS (Gibco) and the levels of HBeAg or HBsAg were measured by using the HBeAg or HBsAg ELISA kit (Bluegene) according to the manufacturer’s direction.
Cell Viability Assay
Cell viability was determined with cell counting kit-8 (Dojindo) according to the manufacturer’s direction.
Viral Particle Gel Assay
Cells were lysed in the lysis buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl [pH 7.5], 150 mM NaCl, 0.5% CA-630, supplemented with a protease inhibitor cocktail) at room temperature for 10 minutes, spun down at 13,200 rpm for 10 minutes. The supernatants were collected and treated with DNase I, followed by separation on a 1% agarose gel in 1xTris-acetate-EDTA (TAE) buffer. In order to detect capsid DNA, the agarose gel was first denatured by soaking the gel in denaturation buffer (0.5 M NaOH and 1.5 M NaCl), then neutralized in neutralization buffer (1.5 M NaCl and 1 M Tris-HCl [pH 7.4]), blotted onto positively charged nylon membranes, and hybridized with 1 kb dig-labeled probe. The viral DNAs were detected by hybridization and visualized using Kodak X-film. The probe for capsid DNA detection was prepared by PCR with primers -1252-TCCTCTGCCGATCCATACTG-1271-3′ (forward) and 5′-2095-CCACCCAGGTAGCTAGAGTCA-2115-3′ (reverse).
In order to test viral capsid, the agarose gel was directly blotted onto ECL membranes by capillary blotting. The membranes were blocked with 10% non-fat milk in TBS–0.1% Tween 20 for 30 minutes and were incubated with primary antibodies HBc (Dako) for overnight at 4°C. Membranes were washed thrice with each time 10 minutes with TBS–0.1% Tween 20. The HRP conjugated secondary antibody against rabbit (1∶5000) was added to membrane and incubated for 1 hour at room temperature. Membranes were washed thrice with each time 10 minutes with TBS–0.1% Tween 20. Membrane was incubated with substrate for 5 minutes, and then exposed to Kodak X-film or visualized with Biorad’s ChemiDoc MP instrument.
Southern and Northern Blot Hybridization
Cells were harvested 72 hours post-transfection and HBV capsid DNA was extracted as previously described [28] and subjected to electrophoresis in 1.5% agarose gel and blotted onto positively charged nylon membranes. HBV DNA was hybridized with 1 kb dig-labeled probe and visualized by AP conjugated anti-dig antibody [29]. For detection of HBV mRNA, total cellular RNAs were extracted with RNeasy Plus Kit (Qiagen). Five micrograms of total RNAs were resolved in 1.3% agarose gel containing 0.66 M formaldehyde and transferred onto positively charged nylon membranes and probed with 7 ng/ml dig labeled 350 nt RNA probe, synthesized by T7 RNA polymerase. The dig signal was detected by AP conjugated anti-dig antibody [29].
Western Blot Assay
Cells were harvested 48 hours post-transfection or after the indicated treatment time. Cells were washed once with room-temperature PBS and lysed with lysis buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl [pH 7.5], 150 mM NaCl, 0.5% CA-630, supplemented with a protease inhibitor cocktail). Cell lysates were mixed with 4×SDS loading buffer and 10 mM DTT, and were boiled for 5 minutes at 100°C. Equal amounts of proteins were subjected to SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE) and were then transferred to nitrocellulose membranes (Invitrogen). The membranes were blocked with 10% nonfat milk in TBS–0.1% Tween 20 for at least 30 minutes and were then incubated with the indicated primary antibodies against FLAG (Sigma), TRIM41 (Abcam), β-actin (Sigma), HBc (Dako), GAPDH (Cell signaling) for overnight at 4°C. Membranes were washed thrice with each time 10 minutes with TBS–0.1% Tween 20. The HRP conjugated secondary antibody against rabbit (1∶5000) or mouse (1∶5000) was added to membrane and incubated for 1 hour at room temperature. Membranes were washed thrice with each time 10 minutes with TBS–0.1% Tween 20. Membranes were incubated with substrate for 5 minutes, and then exposed to Kodak X-film or visualized with Biorad’s ChemiDoc MP instrument.
Luciferase Reporter Assay
5×104 cells were seeded into each well of 24 well plates. After incubation for 16 hours, cells were transfected with 0.2 µg of firefly luciferase containing plasmid and 0.1 µg of pCMV Renilla luciferase, as well as the indicated 0.2 µg of TRIM expression plasmid. After transfection for 48 hours, cells were harvested with the addition of 450 µl cell lysis buffer. The luciferase assays were performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Promega).
Quantitative Real-time Polymerase Chain Reaction
Total RNA was isolated from HepG2, Huh7, and HepG2.2.15 cells by RNeasy Plus Kit (Qiagen) and was reverse-transcribed (RT) using a complementary DNA (cDNA) synthesis kit (Biorad) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Subsequently, cDNA was subjected to quantitative real-time PCR using a Lightcycler480 and SYBR Green system (Roche Diagnostics) following the manufacturer’s protocol with primers specified in Table S2.
Immunofluorescence
1×105 HepG2 cells were seeded into 12-well plates. After one day, cells were transfected with indicated TRIM41wt or mutants as indicated. One day post transfection, cells were seeded to chamber slides coated with Poly-lysine. One day later, cells were fixed with 3.7% paraformaldehyde for 20 minutes at room temperature, followed by washing with PBS three times. Then, cells were blocked with 2% BSA in 1×TBS containing 0.5% Triton-X-100 for 30 minutes at room temperature. After being washed with 1×TBS containing 0.1% Triton-X-100 three times, TRIM41 antibody (5 µg/ml) was added to cells, and incubated at room temperature for 1 hour, and then washed with 1×TBS containing 0.1% Triton-X-100 three times. Goat anti Rabbit Ig H+L Alex 488 antibody (0.4 µg/ml) was added to cells to incubate at room temperature for 1 hour, followed by three times PBS washing. Finally, cells were incubated with 2 µg/ml DAPI, and washed 6 times with PBS. Add mount medium to cells and cover with a glass slide, and then the cells were visualized with Leica confocal microscope.
Immunoprecipitation Assay
2×105 HepG2.2.15 cells were seeded into T75 flask. After one day, cells were transfected with indicated TRIM41 siRNA with a final concentration of 15 nM as mentioned above. Two days post transfection, cells were washed thrice with 15 ml PBS (GIBCO), and then lysed with 1 ml IP buffer (Thermo) containing 1× cocktail (Sigma) for 10 minutes on ice. Cell lysates were centrifuged at 13,200 rpm for 10 minutes 4°C, and the supernatants were transferred to a clean 1.5 ml Eppendorf tube. The protein concentrations were quantified by BCA kit (Thermo). To clear the lysates, the same protein amount of cell lysates was added with 20 µl of protein A/G agarose beads (Shuiyuan Biotech) and incubated by rotation at 4°C for 2 hours, and then cell lysates were collected again by centrifugation and transferred to another new tube. For the binding of TRIM41 with antibody, 5 µg TRIM41 antibody (Abcam) was added to each tube of cell lysates and incubated at 4°C overnight. Next day, 20 µl of protein A/G beads were added to each tube of cell lysates with antibody, and incubated for 2 hours at 4°C. To pellet the beads, the tubes were centrifuged by briefly spinning with the highest speed of 8,000 rpm. The beads were washed with 50×volume PBS of packed beads for 5 times. Then 60 µl of 1× SDS loading buffer (Invitrogen) was added to each tube and proteins were denatured by heat at 100°C for 5 minutes. Finally, the protein samples were subjected to polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and Western blot to determine the expression of TRIM41.
Statistical Analyses
Student’s t-test available in Microsoft software Excel was used to determine the statistical significance of the data.
Supporting Information
Acknowledgments
We thank Dr. Qiang Deng in Pasteur Institute of Shanghai for pHBV1.3 plasmid.
Funding Statement
The authors have no support or funding to report.
References
- 1. Hatakeyama S (2011) TRIM proteins and cancer. Nat Rev Cancer 11: 792–804. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. McNab FW, Rajsbaum R, Stoye JP, O’Garra A (2011) Tripartite-motif proteins and innate immune regulation. Curr Opin Immunol 23: 46–56. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Munir M (2010) TRIM proteins: another class of viral victims. Sci Signal 3: jc2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Ozato K, Shin DM, Chang TH, Morse HC, 3rd (2008) TRIM family proteins and their emerging roles in innate immunity. Nat Rev Immunol 8: 849–860. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Carthagena L, Bergamaschi A, Luna JM, David A, Uchil PD, et al. (2009) Human TRIM gene expression in response to interferons. PLoS One 4: e4894. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Hatziioannou T, Perez-Caballero D, Yang A, Cowan S, Bieniasz PD (2004) Retrovirus resistance factors Ref1 and Lv1 are species-specific variants of TRIM5alpha. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101: 10774–10779. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Perron MJ, Stremlau M, Song B, Ulm W, Mulligan RC, et al. (2004) TRIM5alpha mediates the postentry block to N-tropic murine leukemia viruses in human cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101: 11827–11832. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Stremlau M, Owens CM, Perron MJ, Kiessling M, Autissier P, et al. (2004) The cytoplasmic body component TRIM5alpha restricts HIV-1 infection in Old World monkeys. Nature 427: 848–853. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Wolf D, Cammas F, Losson R, Goff SP (2008) Primer binding site-dependent restriction of murine leukemia virus requires HP1 binding by TRIM28. J Virol 82: 4675–4679. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Taylor RT, Lubick KJ, Robertson SJ, Broughton JP, Bloom ME, et al. (2011) TRIM79alpha, an interferon-stimulated gene product, restricts tick-borne encephalitis virus replication by degrading the viral RNA polymerase. Cell Host Microbe 10: 185–196. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Gao B, Duan Z, Xu W, Xiong S (2009) Tripartite motif-containing 22 inhibits the activity of hepatitis B virus core promoter, which is dependent on nuclear-located RING domain. Hepatology 50: 424–433. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Kajaste-Rudnitski A, Marelli SS, Pultrone C, Pertel T, Uchil PD, et al. (2011) TRIM22 inhibits HIV-1 transcription independently of its E3 ubiquitin ligase activity, Tat, and NF-kappaB-responsive long terminal repeat elements. J Virol 85: 5183–5196. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Wang J, Liu B, Wang N, Lee YM, Liu C, et al. (2011) TRIM56 is a virus- and interferon-inducible E3 ubiquitin ligase that restricts pestivirus infection. J Virol 85: 3733–3745. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Uchil PD, Quinlan BD, Chan WT, Luna JM, Mothes W (2008) TRIM E3 ligases interfere with early and late stages of the retroviral life cycle. PLoS Pathog 4: e16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Oke V, Wahren-Herlenius M (2012) The immunobiology of Ro52 (TRIM21) in autoimmunity: a critical review. J Autoimmun 39: 77–82. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Gack MU, Shin YC, Joo CH, Urano T, Liang C, et al. (2007) TRIM25 RING-finger E3 ubiquitin ligase is essential for RIG-I-mediated antiviral activity. Nature 446: 916–920. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Shi M, Deng W, Bi E, Mao K, Ji Y, et al. (2008) TRIM30 alpha negatively regulates TLR-mediated NF-kappa B activation by targeting TAB2 and TAB3 for degradation. Nat Immunol 9: 369–377. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Tsuchida T, Zou J, Saitoh T, Kumar H, Abe T, et al. (2010) The ubiquitin ligase TRIM56 regulates innate immune responses to intracellular double-stranded DNA. Immunity 33: 765–776. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Shen Y, Li NL, Wang J, Liu B, Lester S, et al. (2012) TRIM56 is an essential component of the TLR3 antiviral signaling pathway. J Biol Chem 287: 36404–36413. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Versteeg GA, Rajsbaum R, Sanchez-Aparicio MT, Maestre AM, Valdiviezo J, et al. (2013) The E3-Ligase TRIM Family of Proteins Regulates Signaling Pathways Triggered by Innate Immune Pattern-Recognition Receptors. Immunity 38: 384–398. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Uchil PD, Hinz A, Siegel S, Coenen-Stass A, Pertel T, et al. (2013) TRIM protein-mediated regulation of inflammatory and innate immune signaling and its association with antiretroviral activity. J Virol 87: 257–272. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Lee WM (1997) Hepatitis B virus infection. N Engl J Med 337: 1733–1745. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Chisari FV, Ferrari C (1995) Hepatitis B virus immunopathogenesis. Annu Rev Immunol 13: 29–60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Guidotti LG, Chisari FV (2006) Immunobiology and pathogenesis of viral hepatitis. Annu Rev Pathol 1: 23–61. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Perrillo R (2009) Benefits and risks of interferon therapy for hepatitis B. Hepatology. 49: S103–111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Janssen HL, van Zonneveld M, Senturk H, Zeuzem S, Akarca US, et al. (2005) Pegylated interferon alfa-2b alone or in combination with lamivudine for HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B: a randomised trial. Lancet 365: 123–129. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Lau GK, Piratvisuth T, Luo KX, Marcellin P, Thongsawat S, et al. (2005) Peginterferon Alfa-2a, lamivudine, and the combination for HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B. N Engl J Med. 352: 2682–2695. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Guo H, Jiang D, Zhou T, Cuconati A, Block TM, et al. (2007) Characterization of the intracellular deproteinized relaxed circular DNA of hepatitis B virus: an intermediate of covalently closed circular DNA formation. J Virol 81: 12472–12484. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Shi L, Li S, Shen F, Li H, Qian S, et al. (2012) Characterization of nucleosome positioning in hepadnaviral covalently closed circular DNA minichromosomes. J Virol 86: 10059–10069. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Mao R, Zhang J, Jiang D, Cai D, Levy JM, et al. (2011) Indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase mediates the antiviral effect of gamma interferon against hepatitis B virus in human hepatocyte-derived cells. J Virol 85: 1048–1057. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Quasdorff M, Protzer U (2010) Control of hepatitis B virus at the level of transcription. J Viral Hepat 17: 527–536. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Moolla N, Kew M, Arbuthnot P (2002) Regulatory elements of hepatitis B virus transcription. J Viral Hepat 9: 323–331. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Li M, Xie Y, Wu X, Kong Y, Wang Y (1995) HNF3 binds and activates the second enhancer, ENII, of hepatitis B virus. Virology 214: 371–378. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Johnson JL, Raney AK, McLachlan A (1995) Characterization of a functional hepatocyte nuclear factor 3 binding site in the hepatitis B virus nucleocapsid promoter. Virology 208: 147–158. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Raney AK, Johnson JL, Palmer CN, McLachlan A (1997) Members of the nuclear receptor superfamily regulate transcription from the hepatitis B virus nucleocapsid promoter. J Virol 71: 1058–1071. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Banks KE, Anderson AL, Tang H, Hughes DE, Costa RH, et al. (2002) Hepatocyte nuclear factor 3beta inhibits hepatitis B virus replication in vivo. J Virol 76: 12974–12980. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Chen D, Gould C, Garza R, Gao T, Hampton RY, et al. (2007) Amplitude control of protein kinase C by RINCK, a novel E3 ubiquitin ligase. J Biol Chem 282: 33776–33787. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Tanaka M, Fukuda Y, Mashima K, Hanai R (2005) Intracellular localization and domain organization of human TRIM41 proteins. Mol Biol Rep 32: 87–93. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Ruby T, Bed’Hom B, Wittzell H, Morin V, Oudin A, et al. (2005) Characterisation of a cluster of TRIM-B30.2 genes in the chicken MHC B locus. Immunogenetics 57: 116–128. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Acs G, Sells MA, Purcell RH, Price P, Engle R, et al. (1987) Hepatitis B virus produced by transfected Hep G2 cells causes hepatitis in chimpanzees. ProcNatlAcadSciUSA 84: 4641–4644. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Rowe HM, Kapopoulou A, Corsinotti A, Fasching L, Macfarlan TS, et al.. (2013) TRIM28 repression of retrotransposon-based enhancers is necessary to preserve transcriptional dynamics in embryonic stem cells. Genome Res. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 42. Zhao KW, Sikriwal D, Dong X, Guo P, Sun X, et al. (2011) Oestrogen causes degradation of KLF5 by inducing the E3 ubiquitin ligase EFP in ER-positive breast cancer cells. Biochem J 437: 323–333. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Zou W, Zhang DE (2006) The interferon-inducible ubiquitin-protein isopeptide ligase (E3) EFP also functions as an ISG15 E3 ligase. J Biol Chem 281: 3989–3994. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Shimizu I, Kohno N, Tamaki K, Shono M, Huang HW, et al. (2007) Female hepatology: favorable role of estrogen in chronic liver disease with hepatitis B virus infection. World J Gastroenterol 13: 4295–4305. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Almog Y, Klein A, Adler R, Laub O, Tur-Kaspa R (1992) Estrogen suppresses hepatitis B virus expression in male athymic mice transplanted with HBV transfected Hep G-2 cells. Antiviral Res 19: 285–293. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Wang SH, Yeh SH, Lin WH, Yeh KH, Yuan Q, et al.. (2012) Estrogen receptor alpha represses transcription of HBV genes via interaction with hepatocyte nuclear factor 4alpha. Gastroenterology 142: 989–998 e984. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 47. Guo H, Jiang D, Ma D, Chang J, Dougherty AM, et al. (2009) Activation of pattern recognition receptor-mediated innate immunity inhibits the replication of hepatitis B virus in human hepatocyte-derived cells. J Virol 83: 847–858. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Guidotti LG, Rochford R, Chung J, Shapiro M, Purcell R, et al. (1999) Viral clearance without destruction of infected cells during acute HBV infection [In Process Citation]. Science 284: 825–829. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Guidotti LG, Ishikawa T, Hobbs MV, Matzke B, Schreiber R, et al. (1996) Intracellular inactivation of the hepatitis B virus by cytotoxic T lymphocytes. Immunity 4: 25–36. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Guidotti LG, Ando K, Hobbs MV, Ishikawa T, Runkel L, et al. (1994) Cytotoxic T lymphocytes inhibit hepatitis B virus gene expression by a noncytolytic mechanism in transgenic mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 91: 3764–3768. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Guo J-T, Zhou H, Liu C, Aldrich C, Saputelli J, et al. (2000) Apoptosis and regeneration of hepatocytes during recovery from transient hepadnavirus infection. J Virology 74: 1495–1505. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Jilbert AR, Wu TT, England JM, Hall PM, Carp NZ, et al. (1992) Rapid resolution of duck hepatitis B virus infections occurs after massive hepatocellular involvement. J Virol 66: 1377–1388. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Kajino K, Jilbert AR, Saputelli J, Aldrich CE, Cullen J, et al. (1994) Woodchuck hepatitis virus infections: very rapid recovery after a prolonged viremia and infection of virtually every hepatocyte. J Virol 68: 5792–5803. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54. Summers J, Jilbert AR, Yang W, Aldrich CE, Saputelli J, et al. (2003) Hepatocyte turnover during resolution of a transient hepadnaviral infection. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 100: 11652–11659. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55. Guo JT, Pryce M, Wang X, Barrasa MI, Hu J, et al. (2003) Conditional replication of duck hepatitis B virus in hepatoma cells. J Virol 77: 1885–1893. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56. Nawa T, Ishida H, Tatsumi T, Li W, Shimizu S, et al. (2012) Interferon-alpha suppresses hepatitis B virus enhancer II activity via the protein kinase C pathway. Virology 432: 452–459. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57. Robek MD, Wieland SF, Chisari FV (2002) Inhibition of hepatitis B virus replication by interferon requires proteasome activity. J Virol 76: 3570–3574. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58. Xu C, Guo H, Pan XB, Mao R, Yu W, et al. (2010) Interferons accelerate decay of replication-competent nucleocapsids of hepatitis B virus. J Virol 84: 9332–9340. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.