Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Pediatr Surg. 2008 May;43(5):928–930. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2007.12.041

The increasing incidence of snowboard-related trauma

John R Hayes 1, Jonathan I Groner 1,*
PMCID: PMC3731444  NIHMSID: NIHMS486625  PMID: 18485968

Abstract

Purpose

To investigate injuries among children and adolescents who participate in downhill sports.

Methods

We collected trauma registry data (January 1999–May 2006) from a level 1 pediatric trauma center with an average snowfall of 28 in (71 cm)/y. Cases were analyzed for injury mechanism, injury type, organ injured, Injury Severity Score, age, sex, and whether or not an operation was required.

Results

There were 57 snowboarders and 22 skiers admitted during the study period. Forty-one (72%) of snowboarders and 16 (73%) of skiers required operations; 32 (56%) of snowboarders and 9 (41%) of skiers sustained fractures; and 14 (25%) of snowboarders and 6 (27%) of skiers sustained abdominal injuries. (P = NS for all comparisons). Serious splenic injuries were more common in snowboarders (14% vs 4%), but the difference was not statistically significant. All skiing injuries occurred at recreational facilities (commercial skiing areas), whereas 12% of snowboard injuries occurred at home, other residence, or public parks (P = .08). The most striking finding is the rising number of snowboarding injuries and the relatively stable rate of skiing injuries (see graph).

Conclusions

As the popularity of snowboarding rises, snowboarding injuries in children are increasing. Pediatric surgeons should be wary of the “snowboard spleen.”

Keywords: Snowboard, Skiing, Recreation, Pediatric, Trauma


Although downhill skiing is a well-established sport, snowboarding is relatively new: it was recognized by the International Olympic Committee in 1994 and premiered in the 1998 Winter Olympics in Nagano, Japan [1]. Snowboarding is remarkable for its dramatic rise in popularity [2] and its association with serious injuries [3]. The purpose of this study was to investigate skiing and snowboarding injuries at a level 1 pediatric trauma center that is located outside of the typical “snowbelt” in the United States.

1. Methods

This study was performed at a level 1 pediatric trauma center in Columbus, Ohio. The average snowfall in the region is 28 in (71 cm)/y. We extracted data from a prospectively collected trauma registry data from January 1999 through May 2006 for all patients admitted for injuries that occurred while skiing or snowboarding. The trauma registry captures all patients admitted for the treatment of injury, including those who die in the emergency department after treatment. It does not capture patients discharged to home from the emergency department. By state policy, children less than 16 years old with major injuries are referred to pediatric trauma centers.

There were 79 cases that met the inclusion criteria. These cases were analyzed for injury mechanism, injury type, organ injured, Injury Severity Score, age, sex, and whether or not an operation was required. Statistical analysis was performed using χ2 (except where otherwise indicated), and a P value of less than .05 was considered significant. This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Columbus Children’s Hospital.

2. Results

There were 57 snowboarders and 22 skiers admitted during the study period. There were no deaths in either group. Only two snowboarders wore helmets and no skiers wore helmets. Snowboarders were more likely to be male than skiers (89% vs 68%, P < .05). Forty-one (72%) snowboarders and 16 (73%) skiers required operations; 32 (56%) snowboarders and 9 (41%) skiers sustained fractures; and 14 (25%) snowboarders and 6 (27%) skiers sustained abdominal injuries (P = NS for all comparisons). Serious splenic injuries were more common in snowboarders than in skiers (14% vs 4%), but the difference was not statistically significant. Skiers were hospitalized longer (4 vs 3 days, P = .01, Wilcoxon rank sum). All skiing injuries occurred at recreational facilities (commercial skiing areas), whereas 12% of snowboard injuries occurred in backyards or public parks (Table 1). The most striking finding is the rising number of snowboarding injuries and the relatively stable rate of skiing injuries (Fig. 1).

Table 1.

Characteristics of injured skiers vs injured snowboarders

Skiers Snowboarders P value
n 22 57
Male sex 15 (68%) 51 (89%) .02*
White 18 (82%) 52 (91%) .24
Median age 13 14 .006**
Injured at commercial downhill sports facility 22 (100%) 50 (88%) .08
Head injury 8 (36%) 14 (25%) .29
Required operation 16 (73%) 41 (72%) .94
Fracture (any) 9 (41%) 32 (56%) .22
Abdominal injury 6 (27%) 14 (25%) .80
Splenic injury (severe) 1 (4%) 8 (14%) .23
Length of stay (d) 4 3 .01**

P values calculated by χ2 except for median age and length of stay.

*

P value statistically significant (χ2).

**

P value statistically significant (Wilcoxon rank sum).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Ratio of skiers vs snowboarders (expressed as percent) admitted to the trauma service from 1999 to 2006.

3. Discussion

Reports on downhill winter sports trauma often come from mountainous, high snowfall regions such as Norway [4,5] or Denver (average snowfall, 60 in [152 cm]/y) [68]. However, this study demonstrates that serious downhill sports injuries occur even in a region where the annual snowfall is low and ski resorts are few. The typical patient with downhill sports trauma in this study was white male snowboarder, but skiers had a longer length of stay. Other investigators have also found that male snowboarders are more likely to be injured (particularly splenic injuries), but have a shorter length of stay than skiers [3].

Downhill skiers, because of their cumbersome equipment, depend on chair lifts or similar devices at commercial ski resorts. Snowboarders, on the other hand, do not use poles, and their equipment is lightweight and easily carried. Thus snowboarders are able to practice their sport—and sustain injuries—outside of commercial skiing areas. This report appears to be the first to document serious injuries from “backyard” snowboarding.

More than one fourth of the children in this study sustained head trauma. Commercial ski resorts do not typically require helmet use, although head injuries are a common and potentially severe consequence of a skiing or snowboarding crash. In fact, head trauma is the leading cause of death among snowboarders and skiers [7]. Although other investigators found that snowboarders had 3-fold increase in head trauma compared to skiers [7], we found no difference in head injury rates in this study. However, because our study only captured injuries that required admission to a pediatric trauma center, patients with minor head injuries may have been omitted.

Because the incidence of serious snowboard injuries is rising, there is a need for the development of injury prevention programs and awareness of downhill sports injury patterns. Mandating helmet use at resorts will not prevent all snowboard-related head injuries as some snowboarders are injured outside of commercial recreation areas. Fortunately, helmets are required for all international snowboarding competitions [1]. A broad public awareness campaign could promote the champion athletes who compete in these events as role models for younger downhill sports enthusiasts.

Finally, some investigators have named the snowboarding syndrome of male sex, aerial maneuvers (jumps), and splenic injury “boarder belly.” [3] Our trauma center treated eight snowboarders with severe splenic fractures during the study period. Thus, our surgeons learned that snowboarders with symptoms of abdominal trauma—even if injured in backyards or parks—may have sustained “snowboard spleen.”

Footnotes

Presented at the 39th Annual Meeting of the Canadian Association of Pediatric Surgeons, August 23–26, 2007, St John’s Newfoundland, Canada.

References

  • 1.Torjussen J, Bahr R. Injuries among elite snowboarders (FIS Snowboard World Cup) Br J Sports Med. 2006;40:230–234. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2005.021329. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Sacco DE, Sartorelli DH, Vane DW. Evaluation of alpine skiing and snowboarding injury in a northeastern state. J Trauma. 1998;44:654–659. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199804000-00016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Geddes R, Irish K. Boarder belly: splenic injuries resulting from ski and snowboarding accidents. Emerg Med Australas. 2005;17:157–162. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-6723.2005.00706.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Brudvik C. Child injuries in Bergen, Norway. Injury. 2000;31:761–767. doi: 10.1016/s0020-1383(00)00093-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Bergstrom KA, Askild O, Jorgensen NA, et al. Evaluation of skiing injuries by Injury Severity Score. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 1999;9:110–113. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0838.1999.tb00218.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Hagel BE, Pless IB, Hanley JA. Upper extremity snowboarding injuries: ten-year results from the Colorado Snowboard Injury Survey. Am J Sports Med. 2001;29:676–678. doi: 10.1177/03635465010290052501. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Levy AS, Smith RH. Neurologic injuries in skiers and snowboarders. Semin Neurol. 2000;20:233–245. doi: 10.1055/s-2000-9833. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Prall JA, Winston KR, Brennan R. Severe snowboarding injuries. Injury. 1995;26:539–542. doi: 10.1016/0020-1383(95)00085-n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES