Abstract
B cells play a pivotal role in host adaptive immunity against pathogenic microorganisms, but may also maladaptively contribute to the pathogenesis of autoimmune diseases. In contrast, distinct B cell subsets have the capacity to regulate host immune response, and suppress inflammation. B regulatory cells are a rare population of endogenous B-lymphocytes defined in part by production of the anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10. Although “natural” B regulatory cells exist in vivo, the low frequency of B regulatory cells may be a limiting factor on their impact in autoimmune ailments. In answer to this unmet need, we have developed a novel strategy for alternate lymphoid activation: fusokines. These wholly engineered chimeric leukines fuse two functionally unrelated cytokines for the purpose of alternate immune modulation. The GM-CSF- and IL-15-derived fusokine: GIFT15, possesses entirely novel and unheralded immune modulating properties mediated through the IL15 receptor which reprograms naïve B cells into B regulatory cells (Bregs). In this article, we review the current approaches to generate Bregs in vitro, and highlight gain-of-function mechanisms by which GIFT15-induced Bregs abrogate pathogenic autoimmunity in mice. We also demonstrate that the human equivalent of inducible Bregs may also serve as a new potent therapeutic tool for treatment of autoimmune disease.
Keywords: Fusokine, GM-CSF, IL-10, IL-15, Bregs, inflammation, multiple sclerosis
Two Timing B cells
B-cell and T-cell immune responses are two arms of host adaptive immunity against pathogenic microorganismal assault. Being a heterogeneous population of lymphatic cells, B cells posses multiple immune functions. Since their description by Max Cooper [1], B-cells and their progeny, have been defined as the stalwarts of humoral immunity [2]. It is now well known B cells also prime host immunity through specific antigen presentation to T cells [3], and promote immune response via secretion of a variety of cytokines upon infectious stimuli [4]. Regretfully, B cells also contribute to the pathogenesis of autoimmune diseases via maladapted autoantibody-mediated pathology as exemplified by autoimmune response to red blood cells and neuronal synapses [5].
Notwithstanding their ill-behaved brethren, accumulating evidence from both murine models of autoimmune disease and human subjects reveals the existence of a “regulatory” B-cell subset – Bregs akin to Tregs [6, 7, 8]. Native Bregs produce the anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10 and TGF-β, negatively modulate T effectors or antigen-presenting cells, and suppress chronic inflammatory response [9]. The existence of Bregs was first inferred in mice with B-cell deficiency (μMT). Mice lacking B cells could not constrain the inflammatory response to myelin basic protein peptide Ac1–11, suffering an unusual severe and chronic form of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis [10, 11, 12], suggesting the existence of a benevolent Breg subset. Complementary evidence suggested the existence of Bregs. Indeed, pharmacological therapeutic depletion of B cells in human subjects exacerbated ulcerative colitis [13] or psoriasis [14]. Moreover, B cells are seemingly involved in human renal allograft transplant tolerance [15].
As a minority B-cell population that has shared features with CD5+ B1 and CD1d+ B2 cells [16], IL-10 producing Bregs are reported to express a pattern of unique surface markers. In murine spleen, IL-10 positive B10 cells express CD19, CD1d and CD5 [17]. Marginal zone IL-10-producing Bregs are CD1d+CD21+CD23lowIgM+ [18, 19]. Additionally, IL10-secreting transitional T2-MZ precursor B cells bear CD1d, CD21, CD23, CD24, and IgM [6, 16]. In humans, Bregs in peripheral blood are CD19+CD27+ [20] or CD19+CD24+CD38+ [6, 21]. Recently, a low frequency population of human IL-10+ Bregs was found to co-express CD24 and CD27 [22]. Bregs are detectable within most lymphoid tissues, spleen and bone marrow, with frequencies of 1.4% Bregs in the spleen [23], 0.4–0.8% in blood, and 2–3% in bone marrow [24]. Due to their low abundance in vivo, harvest of autologous Bregs for clinical use is limited. Unlike T-cells, there are no defined clinical methods to expand the number of Bregs for adoptive cell therapy strategies. Thus, it would be of great use to develop efficient methods for generating Bregs in vitro that could be utilized for treatment of patients with immune diseases.
In this review, we will review potential extrinsic stimulators for Bregs in vitro and will specifically describe how the novel fusion cytokine GIFT15 reprograms naïve B cells to inducible Bregs (iBregs). We will highlight the phenotype, function and immune suppressive properties of iBregs, and discuss the challenge ahead generating iBregs for first-in-human clinical use. We propose that iBregs can serve as a potent therapeutic tool for personalized cell therapy for human autoimmune diseases.
Extrinsic stimulators for Breg induction
B cells express a panel of surface molecules for cell interaction and activation. B-cell receptors (BCR), B cell-activating factor [25], CD40 and Toll-like receptors (TLR) [26] are the receptors expressed on B cell surface that are essential for B cell maturation, antigen presentation, T cell interaction and pathogen sensing [25, 27, 28]. However, activation of B cells through BCR pathway, CD40 ligation, TLR or BAFF signaling can also induce distinct populations of regulatory B cells [29, 30, 31].
CD40 - a costimulatory molecule [32] is required for the generation and suppressive function of Bregs. Treatment of CD40 with agonistic CD40 monoclonal antibody or CD40 ligand in vitro activates B cells to secrete the anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10 [29, 33]. Activation of naïve B cells isolated from untreated patients by CD40 engagement results in a significant increase of IL-10 production in the B cells [34]. CD40 ligation on arthritic-genic B cells generated a subset of IL-10-secreting B cells that prevent arthritis [35]. It is interesting that IL-10 production was found to be restricted to the subpopulation of CD40L+ B cells [36], pinpointing the essential role of the CD40 molecule and its ligand CD154 for the induction of Bregs.
TLRs are pathogenic pattern recognition receptors that sense the presence of a variety of microbes [37] or sterile self-products [38]. Activation of TLRs such as TLR4, and TLR9 via MyD88 signaling pathway can induce immune-suppressive murine regulatory B cells in vitro secreting IL-10 [39]. TLR4 ligand LPS or TLR9 ligand CpG, have been shown to promote Breg differentiation and expansion in vitro. Those TLR-activated murine Bregs could suppress inflammation in vivo after adoptive transfer in the mouse model of EAE. However, human B cells do not express TLR4. Therefore, LPS stimulation cannot induce human Bregs [26]. B cells without TLR4 or MyD88 also cannot suppress chronic EAE [39]. TLR9 stimulation with CpG induces murine MZ B cells to secrete IL-10 [40], and inhibits Th1 pro-inflammatory immune responses [41]. It was also reported TLR9 activation ex vivo is involved in the production of IL-10 by human CD27+ B cells or CD38hgih transitional B-cells [42]. Based on the important roles of TLR, BCR, and CD40 on the generation of Bregs, a two-step model of Breg induction has been proposed [30]: an initial step by TLR priming, followed by BCR recognition and CD40 engagement.
As a cytokine of the TNF family that regulates B cell maturation and survival [25], BAFF triggers B cell activation, and induces the differentiation of CD1d+CD5+ IL-10-producing B regulatory cells in vitro [31]. Moreover, BAFF treatment expands the number of marginal zone Bregs in vivo. Consequently, BAFF-induced CD1d+CD5+ Bregs can suppress autoimmune arthritis development in mice through the release of IL-10.
A gene therapy strategy for production of Bregs has also been tested. B cells were transduced with a retroviral vector encoding an antigen fused to an immunoglobulin heavy chain molecule [43]; or transduced with a lentiviral vector expressing IL-10 or/and myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein [10]. Those gene-enhanced B cells were shown to inhibit antigen-specific T and B cells, or induce immune tolerance [43]. The adoptive transfer of those modified B cells before or after the induction of EAE significantly inhibited the chronic inflammation in the murine model [10], due to the suppressive function of those B cells on Th1 and Th17 T cell responses.
In summary, it is possible to generate a Breg-like phenotype through activation by TLR ligands or CD40 ligation, or genetic modification with an antigen-encoded viral vector. However, technical and regulatory limitations make these strategies challenging to translate in to practical pharmaceutical strategies. Hence, the potential of Bregs is constrained by these limitations and defines an unmet technological need. The development of fusokines and in particular GIFT15 addresses this issue.
Reprogramming of naïve B cells to iBregs by GIFT15
In recent years, we have developed a new family of fusion cytokines for cell-based immune modulation to treat cancer or autoimmune diseases. Those fusokines are derived from parental molecules GM-CSF and interleukins (aka GIFTs) [44, 45, 46]. GIFT15 is one member of this family of fusokines, generated from the partnering of GM-CSF and IL-15 [45] (Figure 1). GM-CSF has been routinely used in clinic due to its immune-promoting function to enhance adaptive immunity [47]. IL-15, one of the common γ-chain cytokine family members besides IL-2, IL-4, IL-7, IL-9 and IL-21 [48], plays an essential role in maintaining immune responses [49], but has a very short half-time in comparison with GM-CSF [50]. Pairing GM-CSF and IL-15 together likely increases the longevity of IL-15, and lengthens the exposure of immune system to IL-15 signaling. More importantly, GIFT15 possesses novel biochemical properties that alter its affinities to the IL-15R with remarkable gain-of-function features [45]. Our seminal discovery was that the coupling of two functionally distinct cytokines into a bi-functional hybrid allows for unheralded and novel immune activity that could not seen or predicted by simply combined use of the parental components. GIFTs essentially behave as entirely new cytokines that hijack normal receptor signaling in responsive lymphoid cells in a manner not seen in nature. The effect of GIFT15 on B-cells was such an event and the genesis of GIFT15-induced Bregs an unexpected and fortuitous outcome.
Figure 1. Structure of fusokine Gift15 protein.

A: amino acid sequence. B: three dimension structure, modified from the reference 45 (Blood, 109: 2234-42, 2007).
GIFT15 and the genesis of inducible Bregs (iBregs)
GIFT15 was originally designed with the objective of enhancing pro-inflammatory effects that link innate immune response with adaptive immunity. However, to our surprise, GIFT15 displayed an unexpected immune suppressive function manifest by the conversion of naïve B cells into a unique population of IL-10 producing iBregs [51]. This feature allowed us to rapidly generate a large number of iBregs in vitro from peripherally available naïve B cells.
B-cell development and differentiation are strictly controlled by intrinsic signaling and transcription factors [52]. GIFT15 stimulation activates asymmetrical signaling downstream of the IL15 receptor (R) β and γ chains in B cells, causing hypophosphorylation of STAT5 and hyper-phosphorylation of STAT3 [45]. STAT3 has suppressive, proliferative, anti-apoptotic, and pro-survival properties [53]. Consequently, aberrant signaling downstream of the IL15R complex ultimately induces the differentiation of suppressive Bregs from naïve B cells [51]. We discovered that GIFT15 treatment of mice could induce tolerance to allogeneic and xenogeneic tumor transplant in mice [45]. We have also shown that adoptive transfer of syngeneic GIFT15-iBregs reverses symptomatic neuroinflammation in a mouse model of EAE [51].
What are iBregs? GIFT15-generated iBregs express an array of surface molecules [51], which share some of the typical markers within a panel of inducible Bregs [17, 19, 40]. Flow cytometry profiles murine GIFT15-iBreg as B220+, CD1d+, CD21+, CD22+, CD23+, CD24+, CD43+, CD79B+, CD138+, IgD+, IgM+, and MHCII+ (Figure 2). Those iBreg also express the trimeric IL-15 receptor that is consistent of IL-15Rα, IL-2Rβ and the common γ chain. However, GIFT15-iBregs cells do not express CD131 (a component of GM-CSF receptor) and CD27 that is phenotypically expressed on human memory B cells. Cell surface markers are differentially expressed during B-cell activation and differentiation. CD1d, an MHCI-like molecule, is now commonly accepted as a surface marker for IL10-secreting Bregs [18, 54]. CD1d is also required for natural Breg's suppressive function [55]. CD1d up-regulation on GIFT15-reprogrammed naïve B cells indicates GIFT15-iBreg formation possess some commonality with other types of inducible Bregs. The positive express of CD1d, together with CD21, CD23, IgM and IgD classify GIFT15-iBreg with characteristics of the transitional two-marginal zone B cells [40]. CD138 is a typical surface marker for plasma cells. GIFT15 treatment of naïve B cells induces CD138 expression, indicating GIFT15-iBreg is unique in comparison with other forms of inducible Bregs. Overall, GIFT15-iBregs have a combined phenotype that is partially aligned with regulatory B10 cells, MZ-T2 regulatory B cells and plasma cells.
Figure 2. Surface markers of Gift15-iBregs.

Blue line is primary antibody. Red line is antibody isotype control.
Immune suppressive mechanisms of GIFT15-iBreg
It has been suggested that the immune suppressive properties of Bregs arise from the secretion of soluble inhibitory factor IL-10 or TGF-β, as recently described in murine models of human autoimmune diseases [55, 56, 57]. We have demonstrated that GIFT15-iBreg acquire immune suppressor function via IL-10 [51] (Figure 3), but not TGF-β (data not shown). Indeed, GIFT15-iBregs derived from IL-10−/− mice are incapable of suppressing inflammation in vivo. As an anti-inflammatory cytokine, IL-10 inhibits T cell polarization and proliferation [42, 56, 58], blocks antigen presentation by antigen presenting cells, and inhibits inflammatory cytokine production by immune effector cells [39]. It was reported that IL-10 promotes the differentiation and expansion of regulatory T cells [59, 60]. It is therefore possible that IL-10 secreted by GIFT15-iBreg may also promote the expansion and development of T regulatory cells in vivo.
Figure 3. IL-10 production by Gift15-iBregs.

Naïve B cells from mouse spleen (5×105 cells/ml) were treated with Gift15 protein in RPMI-1640 medium for 5 days. IL-10 production by Gift15 induced Bregs was quantified with mouse IL-10 ELISA kit.
Notwithstanding the requirement of IL-10 for iBreg suppressor function, we've also observed that suppressor function also arises through an IL-10-independent mechanism that does not involve soluble factors. Indeed, regulatory functions of endogenous Bregs are apparently dependent on cell-cell contact through major histocompatibility complex (MHC), B7 co-stimulatory molecules or Fas [61, 62, 63]. We have found this to be operative in GIFT15-iBregs as well; we also observed that MHCII is up regulated on the surface of GIFT15-iBregs and that GIFT15-iBregs derived from MHCII−/− mice are devoid of suppressor in vitro and in vivo [51], despite their abundant production of IL10. These observations confirm the pivotal role of MHCII expression as well as IL-10 for the suppressor function of GIFT15-iBregs. Intriguingly, GIFT15-iBregs can suppress EAE despite their lack of exposure to MOG antigen in vitro. Hence, whether and how GIFT15-iBregs interact in a MHCII-driven synapse with MOG-specific T cell subsets remains unclear.
GIFT15-iBreg for cell immune therapy
Amongst the first use of B-cell based cell therapy for autoimmune disorders was the adoptive transfer of activated B cells for induction of immune tolerance in mice [64, 65]. In μMT B-cell deficient mice, absence of B cells did not prevent symptomatic EAE but instead worsened disease outcome after immunization with MOG peptides. Adoptive transfer of normal B cells, but not IL-10−/− B cells, ameliorated EAE disease severity in the μMT mice. In our hands, GIFT15-iBregs as an immune therapeutic tool were tested in an established mouse model of EAE. Adoptive transfer of 2 million syngeneic GIFT15-iBregs efficiently suppressed MOG-specific activated T cells, and stopped inflammation in spinal cords, leading to complete recovery of EAE mice. Control mice treated with naïve B-cells or GIFT15 iBregs derived from IL-10−/− or MHCII−/− mice did not improve their disease score [51]. Interestingly, EAE mice (on a C57BL/6 background) treated with MHC mismatched GIFT15-iBregs (derived from Balb/c mice) did not improve as well, suggesting that a functional MHCII synapse is required or that GIFT15-Bregs are immune rejected in mismatched recipients. Therefore, from a translation perspective, “universal donor” GIFT15-iBregs would be predictably of no use to treat an immune ailment in recipients with a normal immune system. The sum of these observations support the notion that autologous blood-derived naïve B-cells collected from a routine leukapheresis procedure would be amenable to ex vivo iBreg conversion and subsequently utilized as a personalized adoptive cell therapy. Transplanted cell death may be a limiting factor on the overall effectiveness of cell therapies such as iBregs-based treatment. How iBregs are recognized by the host immune system in patients will determine whether an innate or adaptive immune response is evoked. Being derived from self, autologous GIFT15-iBregs will not be immune rejected by patients with auto-inflammatory diseases.
We recently explored the possibility whether we could convert B cells from peripheral blood of patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) to iBreg by GIFT15. Indeed, a population of IL-10-producing GIFT15-iBregs was reprogrammed from naïve B cells in the circulation of MS patients after six days of GIFT15 treatment (Figure 4). Harvesting and ex vivo manipulation of autologous naïve B cells from peripheral blood of patients is an entirely feasible procedure in MS. The successful rapid generating of human iBregs with GIFT15 provides the rationale for developing personalized GIFT15-iBregs-based adoptive therapy for MS patients.
Figure 4. Converting naive B cells from MS patients to Gift15-iBregs.

Circulating naïve B cells (5×105 cells/ml) from patients were treated with or without Gift15 protein for 5 days. IL-10 secretion by Gift15-converted Bregs (middle), or control B cells (left) was quantified with human IL-10 ELISA kit (right).
GIFT15-iBregs could also be a therapeutic option for other autoimmune and inflammatory diseases, such as graft-versus-host disease (GvHD), inflammatory arthritis and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). IL-10-producing B cells have a protective effect on acute GvHD in mice, attenuating CD4+ T-cell proliferation and suppressing Th1 differentiation [66]. A high content of B cell progenitors in stem cell graft in human is associated with a significantly lower rate of acute GvHD [67]. Adoptive transfer of TLR4-activated B cells that express Fas ligand and secret TGF-β1prevents the development of diabetes in NOD mice [56]. Administration of B220+CD1d+CD21+CD23+IgM+ Bregs improved collagen-induced arthritis in mouse model [35]. IL-10+ regulatory B10 cells inhibited intestinal injury in a mouse model of dextran sulfate sodium-induced inflammatory bowel disease [68]. The potential role of endogenous Bregs in those diseases, and the proven therapeutic property of GIFT15-iBreg for EAE strongly suggest that GIFT15-iBregs may be a very promising approach for the treatment of an array of alloimmune and autoimmune ailments.
Conclusion
Utilization of inducible Breg provides a new strategy for cell therapy for autoimmune diseases. A bioengineered chimeric fusokine GIFT15 displays remarkable and unheralded immune-modulatory properties and robustly reprogram naïve B cells, even pathogenic B cells from diseased subjects, to inducible B regulatory cells. GIFT15-iBregs require both IL-10- and MHCII-dependent molecular mechanisms for suppressive action, although how GIFT15-iBregs specifically interact with pathogenic T cells is incompletely understood. We predict that reprogrammed autologous GIFT15-iBregs may be of benefit for treatment of human auto-inflammatory disease.
Acknowledgements
We thank Dr. Jian-Hui Wu from Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, Department of Oncology, McGill University in Canada, for generating the 3D-structure of GIFT15 protein in Figure 1B. This work is supported by National Institutes of Health (1R01AI093881-01A1) and Georgia Cancer Coalition, USA.
Abbreviations used in this article
- BAFF
B cell-activating factor
- BCR
B-cell receptors
- EAE
experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis
- GIFT15
GM-CSF and IL-15 derived fusokine
- GIFT15-iBregs
GIFT15 induced B regulatory cells
- GM-CSF
granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor
- GvHD
graft-versus-host disease
- IBD
inflammatory bowel disease
- iBreg
inducible B regulatory cells
- MHCII
major histocompatibility complex class II
- MS
multiple sclerosis
- MOG
myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein peptide
- STAT
Signal Transducers and Activators of Transcription protein
- TGF-β
Transforming growth factor beta
- TLR
Toll-like receptors
Footnotes
Conflict of interest: None
References
- 1.Cooper MD, Peterson RD, Good RA. Delineation of the Thymic and Bursal Lymphoid Systems in the Chicken. Nature. 1965;205:143–6. doi: 10.1038/205143a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Calame KL. Plasma cells: finding new light at the end of B cell development. Nature immunology. 2001;2(12):1103–8. doi: 10.1038/ni1201-1103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Pierce SK, Morris JF, Grusby MJ, Kaumaya P, van Buskirk A, Srinivasan M, Crump B, Smolenski LA. Antigen-presenting function of B lymphocytes. Immunol Rev. 1988;106:149–80. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-065x.1988.tb00778.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Harris DP, Haynes L, Sayles PC, Duso DK, Eaton SM, Lepak NM, Johnson LL, Swain SL, Lund FE. Reciprocal regulation of polarized cytokine production by effector B and T cells. Nat Immunol. 2000;1(6):475–82. doi: 10.1038/82717. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Townsend MJ, Monroe JG, Chan AC. B-cell targeted therapies in human autoimmune diseases: an updated perspective. Immunol Rev. 2010;237(1):264–83. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-065X.2010.00945.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Blair PA, Chavez-Rueda KA, Evans JG, Shlomchik MJ, Eddaoudi A, Isenberg DA, Ehrenstein MR, Mauri C. Selective targeting of B cells with agonistic anti-CD40 is an efficacious strategy for the generation of induced regulatory T2-like B cells and for the suppression of lupus in MRL/lpr mice. Journal of immunology. 2009;182(6):3492–502. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.0803052. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Mizoguchi A, Mizoguchi E, Smith RN, Preffer FI, Bhan AK. Suppressive role of B cells in chronic colitis of T cell receptor alpha mutant mice. J Exp Med. 1997;186(10):1749–56. doi: 10.1084/jem.186.10.1749. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Mizoguchi A, Bhan AK. A case for regulatory B cells. J Immunol. 2006;176(2):705–10. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.176.2.705. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Lund FE, Randall TD. Effector and regulatory B cells: modulators of CD4(+) T cell immunity. Nat Rev Immunol. 2010;10(4):236–47. doi: 10.1038/nri2729. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Calderon-Gomez E, Lampropoulou V, Shen P, Neves P, Roch T, Stervbo U, Rutz S, Kuhl AA, Heppner FL, Loddenkemper C, Anderton SM, Kanellopoulos JM, Charneau P, Fillatreau S. Reprogrammed quiescent B cells provide an effective cellular therapy against chronic experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. Eur J Immunol. 2011;41(6):1696–708. doi: 10.1002/eji.201041041. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Fillatreau S, Sweenie CH, McGeachy MJ, Gray D, Anderton SM. B cells regulate autoimmunity by provision of IL-10. Nat Immunol. 2002;3(10):944–50. doi: 10.1038/ni833. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Wolf SD, Dittel BN, Hardardottir F, Janeway CA., Jr. Experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis induction in genetically B cell-deficient mice. J Exp Med. 1996;184(6):2271–8. doi: 10.1084/jem.184.6.2271. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Goetz M, Atreya R, Ghalibafian M, Galle PR, Neurath MF. Exacerbation of ulcerative colitis after rituximab salvage therapy. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2007;13(11):1365–8. doi: 10.1002/ibd.20215. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Dass S, Vital EM, Emery P. Development of psoriasis after B cell depletion with rituximab. Arthritis Rheum. 2007;56(8):2715–8. doi: 10.1002/art.22811. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Newell KA, Asare A, Kirk AD, Gisler TD, Bourcier K, Suthanthiran M, Burlingham WJ, Marks WH, Sanz I, Lechler RI, Hernandez-Fuentes MP, Turka LA, Seyfert-Margolis VL. Identification of a B cell signature associated with renal transplant tolerance in humans. J Clin Invest. 2010;120(6):1836–47. doi: 10.1172/JCI39933. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Hardy RR, Hayakawa K. B cell development pathways. Annu Rev Immunol. 2001;19:595–621. doi: 10.1146/annurev.immunol.19.1.595. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Yanaba K, Bouaziz JD, Haas KM, Poe JC, Fujimoto M, Tedder TF. A regulatory B cell subset with a unique CD1dhiCD5+ phenotype controls T cell-dependent inflammatory responses. Immunity. 2008;28(5):639–50. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2008.03.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Bouaziz JD, Yanaba K, Tedder TF. Regulatory B cells as inhibitors of immune responses and inflammation. Immunol Rev. 2008;224:201–14. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-065X.2008.00661.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Evans JG, Chavez-Rueda KA, Eddaoudi A, Meyer-Bahlburg A, Rawlings DJ, Ehrenstein MR, Mauri C. Novel suppressive function of transitional 2 B cells in experimental arthritis. Journal of immunology. 2007;178(12):7868–78. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.178.12.7868. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Ahuja A, Anderson SM, Khalil A, Shlomchik MJ. Maintenance of the plasma cell pool is independent of memory B cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105(12):4802–7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0800555105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Blair PA, Norena LY, Flores-Borja F, Rawlings DJ, Isenberg DA, Ehrenstein MR, Mauri C. CD19(+)CD24(hi)CD38(hi) B cells exhibit regulatory capacity in healthy individuals but are functionally impaired in systemic Lupus Erythematosus patients. Immunity. 2010;32(1):129–40. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2009.11.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Iwata Y, Matsushita T, Horikawa M, Dilillo DJ, Yanaba K, Venturi GM, Szabolcs PM, Bernstein SH, Magro CM, Williams AD, Hall RP, St Clair EW, Tedder TF. Characterization of a rare IL-10-competent B-cell subset in humans that parallels mouse regulatory B10 cells. Blood. 2011;117(2):530–41. doi: 10.1182/blood-2010-07-294249. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Matsushita T, Yanaba K, Bouaziz JD, Fujimoto M, Tedder TF. Regulatory B cells inhibit EAE initiation in mice while other B cells promote disease progression. J Clin Invest. 2008;118(10):3420–30. doi: 10.1172/JCI36030. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Matsushita T, Tedder TF. Identifying regulatory B cells (B10 cells) that produce IL-10 in mice. Methods Mol Biol. 2011;677:99–111. doi: 10.1007/978-1-60761-869-0_7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Mackay F, Browning JL. BAFF: a fundamental survival factor for B cells. Nat Rev Immunol. 2002;2(7):465–75. doi: 10.1038/nri844. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Bourke E, Bosisio D, Golay J, Polentarutti N, Mantovani A. The toll-like receptor repertoire of human B lymphocytes: inducible and selective expression of TLR9 and TLR10 in normal and transformed cells. Blood. 2003;102(3):956–63. doi: 10.1182/blood-2002-11-3355. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Kurosaki T, Shinohara H, Baba Y. B cell signaling and fate decision. Annu Rev Immunol. 2010;28:21–55. doi: 10.1146/annurev.immunol.021908.132541. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Manicassamy S, Pulendran B. Modulation of adaptive immunity with Toll-like receptors. Semin Immunol. 2009;21(4):185–93. doi: 10.1016/j.smim.2009.05.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Yanaba K, Bouaziz JD, Matsushita T, Tsubata T, Tedder TF. The development and function of regulatory B cells expressing IL-10 (B10 cells) requires antigen receptor diversity and TLR signals. Journal of immunology. 2009;182(12):7459–72. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.0900270. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Lampropoulou V, Calderon-Gomez E, Roch T, Neves P, Shen P, Stervbo U, Boudinot P, Anderton SM, Fillatreau S. Suppressive functions of activated B cells in autoimmune diseases reveal the dual roles of Toll-like receptors in immunity. Immunol Rev. 2010;233(1):146–61. doi: 10.1111/j.0105-2896.2009.00855.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Yang M, Sun L, Wang S, Ko KH, Xu H, Zheng BJ, Cao X, Lu L. Novel function of B cell-activating factor in the induction of IL-10-producing regulatory B cells. Journal of immunology. 2010;184(7):3321–5. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.0902551. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Kehry MR. CD40-mediated signaling in B cells. Balancing cell survival, growth, and death. Journal of immunology. 1996;156(7):2345–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Duddy ME, Alter A, Bar-Or A. Distinct profiles of human B cell effector cytokines: a role in immune regulation? Journal of immunology. 2004;172(6):3422–7. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.172.6.3422. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Harp CT, Ireland S, Davis LS, Remington G, Cassidy B, Cravens PD, Stuve O, Lovett-Racke AE, Eagar TN, Greenberg BM, Racke MK, Cowell LG, Karandikar NJ, Frohman EM, Monson NL. Memory B cells from a subset of treatment-naive relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis patients elicit CD4(+) T-cell proliferation and IFN-gamma production in response to myelin basic protein and myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein. Eur J Immunol. 2010;40(10):2942–56. doi: 10.1002/eji.201040516. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Mauri C, Gray D, Mushtaq N, Londei M. Prevention of arthritis by interleukin 10-producing B cells. The Journal of experimental medicine. 2003;197(4):489–501. doi: 10.1084/jem.20021293. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Desai-Mehta A, Lu L, Ramsey-Goldman R, Datta SK. Hyperexpression of CD40 ligand by B and T cells in human lupus and its role in pathogenic autoantibody production. J Clin Invest. 1996;97(9):2063–73. doi: 10.1172/JCI118643. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Pulendran B. Modulating vaccine responses with dendritic cells and Toll-like receptors. Immunol Rev. 2004;199:227–50. doi: 10.1111/j.0105-2896.2004.00144.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Stewart CR, Stuart LM, Wilkinson K, van Gils JM, Deng J, Halle A, Rayner KJ, Boyer L, Zhong R, Frazier WA, Lacy-Hulbert A, El Khoury J, Golenbock DT, Moore KJ. CD36 ligands promote sterile inflammation through assembly of a Toll-like receptor 4 and 6 heterodimer. Nature immunology. 2010;11(2):155–61. doi: 10.1038/ni.1836. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Lampropoulou V, Hoehlig K, Roch T, Neves P, Calderon Gomez E, Sweenie CH, Hao Y, Freitas AA, Steinhoff U, Anderton SM, Fillatreau S. TLR-activated B cells suppress T cell-mediated autoimmunity. Journal of immunology. 2008;180(7):4763–73. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.180.7.4763. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Brummel R, Lenert P. Activation of marginal zone B cells from lupus mice with type A(D) CpG-oligodeoxynucleotides. Journal of immunology. 2005;174(4):2429–34. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.174.4.2429. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Sun CM, Deriaud E, Leclerc C, Lo-Man R. Upon TLR9 signaling, CD5+ B cells control the IL-12-dependent Th1-priming capacity of neonatal DCs. Immunity. 2005;22(4):467–77. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2005.02.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Bouaziz JD, Calbo S, Maho-Vaillant M, Saussine A, Bagot M, Bensussan A, Musette P. IL-10 produced by activated human B cells regulates CD4(+) T-cell activation in vitro. Eur J Immunol. 2010;40(10):2686–91. doi: 10.1002/eji.201040673. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Scott DW. Gene therapy for immunological tolerance: using `transgenic' B cells to treat inhibitor formation. Haemophilia. 2010;16(102):89–94. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2516.2010.02203.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Stagg J, Wu JH, Bouganim N, Galipeau J. Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor and interleukin-2 fusion cDNA for cancer gene immunotherapy. Cancer Res. 2004;64(24):8795–9. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-1776. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Rafei M, Wu JH, Annabi B, Lejeune L, Francois M, Galipeau J. A GMCSF and IL-15 fusokine leads to paradoxical immunosuppression in vivo via asymmetrical JAK/STAT signaling through the IL-15 receptor complex. Blood. 2007;109(5):2234–42. doi: 10.1182/blood-2006-07-037473. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Williams P, Rafei M, Bouchentouf M, Raven J, Yuan S, Cuerquis J, Forner KA, Birman E, Galipeau J. A fusion of GMCSF and IL-21 initiates hypersignaling through the IL-21Ralpha chain with immune activating and tumoricidal effects in vivo. Mol Ther. 2010;18(7):1293–301. doi: 10.1038/mt.2010.49. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Dranoff G. GM-CSF-based cancer vaccines. Immunol Rev. 2002;188:147–54. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-065x.2002.18813.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Asao H, Okuyama C, Kumaki S, Ishii N, Tsuchiya S, Foster D, Sugamura K. Cutting edge: the common gamma-chain is an indispensable subunit of the IL-21 receptor complex. Journal of immunology. 2001;167(1):1–5. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.167.1.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Fehniger TA, Caligiuri MA. Interleukin 15: biology and relevance to human disease. Blood. 2001;97(1):14–32. doi: 10.1182/blood.v97.1.14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Pettit DK, Bonnert TP, Eisenman J, Srinivasan S, Paxton R, Beers C, Lynch D, Miller B, Yost J, Grabstein KH, Gombotz WR. Structure-function studies of interleukin 15 using site-specific mutagenesis, polyethylene glycol conjugation, and homology modeling. J Biol Chem. 1997;272(4):2312–8. doi: 10.1074/jbc.272.4.2312. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Rafei M, Hsieh J, Zehntner S, Li M, Forner K, Birman E, Boivin MN, Young YK, Perreault C, Galipeau J. A granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor and interleukin-15 fusokine induces a regulatory B cell population with immune suppressive properties. Nat Med. 2009;15(9):1038–45. doi: 10.1038/nm.2003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Corcoran LM. Transcriptional control of B cell activation. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol. 2005;290:105–46. doi: 10.1007/3-540-26363-2_6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Johnston PA, Grandis JR. STAT3 signaling: anticancer strategies and challenges. Mol Interv. 2011;11(1):18–26. doi: 10.1124/mi.11.1.4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Correale J, Farez M, Razzitte G. Helminth infections associated with multiple sclerosis induce regulatory B cells. Ann Neurol. 2008;64(2):187–99. doi: 10.1002/ana.21438. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Mizoguchi A, Mizoguchi E, Takedatsu H, Blumberg RS, Bhan AK. Chronic intestinal inflammatory condition generates IL-10-producing regulatory B cell subset characterized by CD1d upregulation. Immunity. 2002;16(2):219–30. doi: 10.1016/s1074-7613(02)00274-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Tian J, Zekzer D, Hanssen L, Lu Y, Olcott A, Kaufman DL. Lipopolysaccharide-activated B cells down-regulate Th1 immunity and prevent autoimmune diabetes in nonobese diabetic mice. Journal of immunology. 2001;167(2):1081–9. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.167.2.1081. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Fillatreau S, Sweenie CH, McGeachy MJ, Gray D, Anderton SM. B cells regulate autoimmunity by provision of IL-10. Nature immunology. 2002;3(10):944–50. doi: 10.1038/ni833. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Ronet C, Hauyon-La Torre Y, Revaz-Breton M, Mastelic B, Tacchini-Cottier F, Louis J, Launois P. Regulatory B cells shape the development of Th2 immune responses in BALB/c mice infected with Leishmania major through IL-10 production. Journal of immunology. 2010;184(2):886–94. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.0901114. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Sayi A, Kohler E, Toller IM, Flavell RA, Muller W, Roers A, Muller A. TLR-2-activated B cells suppress Helicobacter-induced preneoplastic gastric immunopathology by inducing T regulatory-1 cells. Journal of immunology. 2011;186(2):878–90. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1002269. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Wei B, Velazquez P, Turovskaya O, Spricher K, Aranda R, Kronenberg M, Birnbaumer L, Braun J. Mesenteric B cells centrally inhibit CD4+ T cell colitis through interaction with regulatory T cell subsets. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102(6):2010–5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0409449102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Mann MK, Maresz K, Shriver LP, Tan Y, Dittel BN. B cell regulation of CD4+CD25+ T regulatory cells and IL-10 via B7 is essential for recovery from experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. Journal of immunology. 2007;178(6):3447–56. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.178.6.3447. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Lundy SK, Fox DA. Reduced Fas ligand-expressing splenic CD5+ B lymphocytes in severe collagen-induced arthritis. Arthritis Res Ther. 2009;11(4):R128. doi: 10.1186/ar2795. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Sun JB, Flach CF, Czerkinsky C, Holmgren J. B lymphocytes promote expansion of regulatory T cells in oral tolerance: powerful induction by antigen coupled to cholera toxin B subunit. Journal of immunology. 2008;181(12):8278–87. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.181.12.8278. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Kennedy MW, Thomas DB. A regulatory role for the memory B cell as suppressor-inducer of feedback control. The Journal of experimental medicine. 1983;157(2):547–58. doi: 10.1084/jem.157.2.547. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Shimamura T, Habu S, Hashimoto K, Sasaki S. Feedback suppression of the immune response in vivo. III. Lyt-1+ B cells are suppressor-inducer cells. Cell Immunol. 1984;83(1):221–4. doi: 10.1016/0008-8749(84)90242-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Rowe V, Banovic T, MacDonald KP, Kuns R, Don AL, Morris ES, Burman AC, Bofinger HM, Clouston AD, Hill GR. Host B cells produce IL-10 following TBI and attenuate acute GVHD after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation. Blood. 2006;108(7):2485–92. doi: 10.1182/blood-2006-04-016063. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Michonneau D, Peffault de Latour R, Porcher R, Robin M, Benbunan M, Rocha V, Ribaud P, Ferry C, Devergie A, Vanneaux V, Gluckman E, Marolleau JP, Socie G, Larghero J. Influence of bone marrow graft B lymphocyte subsets on outcome after HLA-identical sibling transplants. Br J Haematol. 2009;145(1):107–14. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2008.07574.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Yanaba K, Yoshizaki A, Asano Y, Kadono T, Tedder TF, Sato S. IL-10-producing regulatory B10 cells inhibit intestinal injury in a mouse model. Am J Pathol. 2011;178(2):735–43. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2010.10.022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
