Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Aug 2.
Published in final edited form as: Biopolymers. 2011 Mar 7;95(9):591–606. doi: 10.1002/bip.21616

Table 5.

Differences in interactions (>50%) observed in free Phe56Trp U1A simulation compared to wild type

Residues Positions Type of interaction Difference
Trp56 – Asp90 β3 to helix C VDW + 78%
Trp56 – Ile94 β3 to helix C VDW + 69%
Asp42 – Lys98 β2 to helix C VDW + 60%
Ala87 – Asp90 loop 6 to helix C VDW + 84%
Lys88 – Asp90 loop 6 to helix C H-bond (N of Lys88 – OD2 of Asp90) + 97%
Thr89 – Ser91 loop 6 to helix C VDW + 63%
His10 – Phe59 β1 to β3 H-bond (ND1 of His10 – O of Phe59) + 56%
His10 – Glu61 β1 to loop 4 VDW − 54%
Ser46 – Gln54 loop 3 H-bond (NE2 of Gln54 – O of Ser46) + 56%
Ser48 – Gln54 loop 3 H-bond (NE2 of Gln54 – OG of Ser48) + 57%
Ser48 – Gln54 loop 3 VDW + 65%
Arg47 – Ser48 loop 3 H-bond (NH2 of Arg47 – O of Ser48) + 62%
Pro76 – Lys80 loop 5 VDW − 71%
Phe77 – Lys80 loop 5 H-bond (N of Phe77 – O of Lys80) − 66%
Ser29 – Tyr78 helix A to loop 5 VDW − 65%