Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Aug 2.
Published in final edited form as: Biopolymers. 2011 Mar 7;95(9):591–606. doi: 10.1002/bip.21616

Table 6.

Differences in interactions (>50%) observed in Phe56Trp U1A-RNA complex simulation compared to wild type

Residues Positions Type of interaction Difference
Tyr13 – Trp56 β1 to β3 VDW − 61%
Trp56 – C5 β3 to RNA loop VDW − 72%
Met51 – A6 loop 3 to RNA loop VDW − 65%
His10 – Lys98 β1 to helix C H-bond (NZ of Lys98 – NE2 of His10) + 56%
His10 – Lys98 β1 to helix C VDW + 62%
Lys60 – Lys98 loop 4 to helix C H-bond (NZ of Lys98 – O of Lys60) + 56%
Glu61 – Lys98 loop 4 to helix C VDW + 57%
C10 – G11 RNA loop to RNA stem H-bond (O2* of C10 – O5* of G11) + 51%