Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Dec 7.
Published in final edited form as: Org Lett. 2012 Nov 16;14(23):5916–5919. doi: 10.1021/ol302837h

Multicomponent Synthesis of Diverse 1,4-Benzodiazepine Scaffolds

Yijun Huang †,§, Kareem Khoury †,, Tyler Chanas , Alexander Dömling †,‡,
PMCID: PMC3732779  NIHMSID: NIHMS422435  PMID: 23157402

Abstract

graphic file with name nihms422435f2.jpg

The 1,4-benzodiazepine (BDZ) scaffold is of particular interest in drug design due to a balanced ensemble of beneficial physicochemical properties including a semi-rigid and compact diazepine ring with spatial placements of several substituents, combined with low number of rotatable bonds, hydrogen bond donors and acceptors, and intermediate lipophilicity. As an alternative to traditional multistep sequential syntheses, we designed routes employing one-pot MCRs to accelerate access diverse BDZ scaffolds in two or three steps.


Library design and synthesis is becoming more and more important as the pharmaceutical industry is realizing that currently available compounds cover not even a glimpse of the chemical space of drug-like compounds. It is well documented that current screening libraries are made for historic targets and rather unsuitable for new target classes which emerged from the human genome project. Examples of such a difficult to target class are protein protein interactions or nuclear hormone receptors. Whereas many of these targets are cellular and biochemically validated, missing medicinal chemistry starting points make them useless for drug discovery. 1,4-Benzodiazepines are a family of drugs that are used to relieve insomnia and anxiety, as well as to treat muscles spasm and prevent seizures.1 Over 40 medications highlight BDZ as a classic privileged structure with a broad range of therapeutic treatments, particularly for the central nervous system.2 Since the BDZ scaffold is of particular interest for drug discovery, many synthetic derivatives with a wide pharmacological spectrum have been extensively developed.3 However, the biological activity is highly dependent on the nature of the BDZ scaffold including the conformation of the 1,4-diazepine ring and its substituents, the propensity of hydrogen bond donor and acceptor, and the electrostatic profile.4 Consequently, the development of expedient synthetic approaches to access new BDZ scaffolds have attracted considerable attention in the discovery of biologically active compounds.5

Multicomponent reaction (MCR) chemistry serves as a unique and versatile synthetic toolbox to access a range of highly substituted heterocyclic systems in a convergent manner.6 Traditionally, substituted BDZs were often accessed by constitute linear syntheses, which limited the efficiency and diversity to build combinatorial libraries of varying sizes and properties.7 In recent years, isocyanide-based MCRs (IMCR) have been proven to be a promising strategy to access large chemical space of BDZs.8 As part of our ongoing interest in the efficient discovery of biologically active compounds,9 we herein report the design of diverse BDZ scaffolds via Ugi four-component reactions (Ugi-4CR) and post-condensation modifications (Scheme 1).

Scheme 1.

Scheme 1

A general strategy for the design of novel BDZ scaffolds by employing bifunctional orthogonal starting materials in the Ugi-4CR and subsequent intramolecular cyclization.

N-Boc-α-amino-aldehydes have been demonstrated to be suitable bifunctional starting materials for IMCR.10 Hulme and others utilized the Ugi reaction with N-Boc-α-amino-aldehydes for a solution phase synthesis of an array of biologically relevant imidazolines and azepinetetrazoles.10,11 Thus, we envisioned novel applications of Boc-glycinal in the Ugi-4CR for the synthesis of BDZs utilizing the Ugi-deprotection-cyclization (UDC) strategy.12 Taking advantages of the concise and powerful synthetic methodologies, this strategy is able to fulfill the drug discovery effort to access uncovered chemical space of BDZs. Anthranilic acid derivatives have been shown to react in the Ugi-4CR,13 thus we proposed a synthetic route using methyl anthranilate 1 as the building block for the synthesis of the first of four 1,4-benzodiazepine scaffolds (Table 1). In the first step (Ugi), methyl anthranilate 1 serves as an amine component for the Ugi-4CR together with an isocyanide 2, Boc-glycinal 3, and a carboxylic acid 4. The Boc protection group of 5 is cleaved in the second step (deprotection), and then the free amine group is condensed with the orthogonal ester group to form the 1,4-diazepine ring in the third step (cyclization) (Scheme 2). The UDC strategy allows the access of 1,4-benzodiazepine-6-ones 6a–f with different substitutions derived from the isocyanide and carboxylic acid inputs (Table 1).

Table 1.

Ugi-4CR route to 1,4-benzodiazepine-6-ones 6a–f

graphic file with name nihms422435t1.jpg

ID R1 R2 yieldsa,b
6a tBu Me 41%
6b tBu cyclohexyl 28%
6c mesityl Me 16%
6d tBu nPr 20%
6e tBu cyclopropenyl 38%
6f tBu p-F-C6H4 22%
a

isolated yields (over three steps).

b

Method A i) MeOH, rt, 2 days; ii) DCM (10% TFA), rt, 2 days; iii) THF, Et3N, triazabicyclodecene (TBD), 40 °C, overnight.

Aminophenylketones are commonly employed building blocks for the synthesis of BDZ scaffolds.14 Since aminophenylketones have shown good reactivity in MCRs as an amine component,15 we designed a new UDC strategy for the rapid access of the second 1,4-benzodiazepine scaffold starting from aminophenylketones. Initially, aminophenylketones 7 serve as an amine component for the Ugi-4CR with an isocyanide 2, Boc-glycinal 3, and a carboxylic acid 4. Microwave irradiation was utilized for the Ugi-4CR to reduce the reaction time.16 In most cases, microwave was applied when the Ugi product was not able to be isolated under the convential condition. In the second step, the deprotected amino group is immediately cyclized with the ketone functionality to form 1,4-diazepine ring. A small focused library of 1,4-benzodiazepines 9a–h with four points of diversity was obtained using this convenient method (Table 2).

Table 2.

Ugi-4CR route to 1,4-benzodiazepines 9a–h

graphic file with name nihms422435t2.jpg

ID X Y R1 R2 yieldsa
9a H Ph tBu Me 47%b
9b H Ph cyclohexyl Me 36%b
9c H Me cyclohexyl Me 43%b
9d H Ph Benzyl Me 40%c
9e 4-Cl Ph tBu CH2OH 22%c
9f 4-Cl Ph tBu nPr 24%c
9g 4-Cl Ph tBu cyclobutyl 25%c
9h 4-Cl o-Cl-C6H4 benzyl Me 13%c
a

isolated yields (over two steps).

b

Method B: i) MeOH, rt, 2 days; ii) DCE (10% TFA), 40 °C, overnight.

c

Method C: i) MeOH, microwave irradiation (100 °C, 30 min); ii) DCE (10% TFA), 40 °C, overnight.

Encouraged by the previous results, the UDC strategy was further applied for the synthesis of the third 1,4-benzodiazepine scaffold. In the first step, aminophenylketones 7 serve as an amine component for the Ugi-4CR with an isocyanide 2, Boc-glycinal 3, and trimethyl azide 10. Microwave assisted Ugi-4CRs proceeded in a reaction time of only 30 min compared to the conventional methodology which required up to 48 h. In the second step, the deprotected amino group immediately cyclizes with the ketone functionality to form a 1,4-diazepine ring. A group of 2-tetrazole substituted 1,4-benzodiazepines 12a–f with three points of diversity were obtained (Table 3).

Table 3.

Ugi-4CR route to 2-tetrazole substituted 1,4-benzodiazepines 12a–f

graphic file with name nihms422435t3.jpg

ID X Y R1 yieldsa
12a H Ph tBu 29%b
12b H Ph cyclohexyl 35%b
12c H Me cyclohexyl 49%b
12d 4-Cl Ph tBu 32%c
12e 4-Cl o-F-C6H4 benzyl 12%c
12f H Ph benzyl 26%c
a

isolated yields (over two steps).

b

Method D: i) MeOH, rt, 2 days; ii)DCE (10% TFA), 40 °C, overnight.

c

Method E: i) MeOH, microwave irradiation (100 °C, 30 min); ii) DCE (10% TFA), 40 °C, overnight.

The above two scaffolds 9 and 12 are unprecedented in the chemical literature, and scaffold 6 is accessible in an unprecedented convenient way. Thus they nicely underscore the ability of the Ugi-4CR to address unexplored drug-like chemical space. Methyl anthranilate and aminophenylketones were for the first time used as the building block for the synthesis of 1,4-benzodiazepine scaffolds via UDC strategy. In the course of our efforts to discover inhibitors of protein-protein interactions (PPI), we aim to generate small molecules tailored “anchors” (amino acid motifs deeply buried in PPI interfaces).17 Based on this concept, we have successfully identified several peptidomimetic scaffolds derived from Ugi-4CR as p53-Mdm2 inhibitors.18 Although Boc-glycinal was employed to access 1,4-benzodiazepines, the commercial availability of substituted α-amino-aldehyde derivatives is rather limited. Therefore, we further developed an alternative approach for the synthesis of BDZ scaffold with an additional point of diversity, which would introduce an “anchor” fragment to the diazepine ring. N-Boc-amino acid is an ideal building block to introduce “anchor” fragments, which can be incorporated into drug-like compounds via MCRs.19 Hence, we employed the UDC strategy to assemble the orthogonal building block N-Boc-amino acid for the synthesis of a BDZ scaffold. First, we developed a synthetic method to allow rapid access to 1,4-benzodiazepines in just two steps from Boc glycine. In the first step, aminophenylketones 7 serve as an amine component for the Ugi-4CR with an isocyanide 2, Boc glycine 13, and an aldehyde 14. The crude Ugi products 15 were not isolated but immediately treated with TFA in 1,2-dichloroethane (DCE) to produce 1,4-benzodiazepines in a one-pot procedure. To our delight, 1,4-benzodiazepines 16a–f with four points of diversity were isolated in reasonable to good yields (Table 4).

Table 4.

Ugi-4CR route to 1,4-benzodiazepines 16a–f

graphic file with name nihms422435t4.jpg

ID X Y R1 R2 yieldsa,b
16a H Ph tBu iPr 38%
16b H Ph tBu H 47%
16c H Me tBu iPr 53%
16d H Me tBu H 66%
16e 4-Cl Ph cyclohexyl H 33%
16f H Ph cyclohexyl H 42%
a

isolated yields (over two steps).

b

Method F: i) MeOH, rt, 2 days; ii) DCE (10% TFA), 40 °C, overnight.

Subsequently, we initiated to test the feasibility for the synthesis of “anchor” biased compound libraries using N-Boc-amino acid derivatives. Phenylalanine, leucine, tryptophan and tyrosine, which are abundant in the protein-protein interaction interface, were selected as examples. N-Boc-amino acids 17 were subjected to the same protocol for the synthesis of 1,4-benzodiazepines 16a–f with variable aminophenylketones and isocyanides. Compounds 20a–m with four points of diversity were isolated by chromatography in 22–69% yield over two steps (Table 5). These examples further demonstrate the ease of synthesis and the increase in molecular complexity during the two-step one-pot procedure, which is remarkable for the efficient synthesis of 1,4-benzodiazepines containing a variety of “anchor” residues.

Table 5.

Synthesis of anchor-directed 1,4-benzodiazepines 20a–m

graphic file with name nihms422435t5.jpg

ID X Y R1 anchor yieldsa,b
20a H Ph tBu Phe 41%
20b H Ph tBu Leu 41%
20c H Ph cyclohexyl Phe 50%
20d H Ph cyclohexyl Leu 69%
20e H Me tBu Phe 44%
20f H Me tBu Leu 46%
20g 4-Cl Ph tBu Phe 32%
20h 4-Cl Ph tBu Leu 43%
20i H Ph tBu Trp 26%
20j H Ph tBu Tyr 29%
20k H Ph cyclohexyl Trp 65%
20l H Ph cyclohexyl Tyr 60%
20m H Me benzyl Trp 22%
a

isolated yields (over two steps).

b

Method F: i) MeOH, rt, 2 days; ii) DCE (10% TFA), 40 °C, overnight.

It has to be noted that the same scaffold 16 synthesized here in 2 steps is also accessible by the Ellman’s method via a versatile solid phase synthesis of 1,4-benzodiazepines over seven steps.20 Thus we have significantly improved the efficiency and diversity for the synthesis of new BDZs using a convergent Ugi-4CR followed by deprotection and intramolecular cyclization. These scaffolds can serve as novel chemotypes for the drug design efforts especially on less tractable targets, since the pseudopeptidic backbone of the 1,4-benzodiazepine and its derivatives have shown the potential to develop PPI inhibitors.18a,21

Finally we have created virtual libraries based on the herein described BDZ scaffolds. These virtual libraries are now part of the ~25 million MCR compound comprising database of recently initiated pharmacophore-based virtual screening platform AnchorQuery (http://anchorquery.ccbb.pitt.edu) for the discovery of PPI inhibitors.22 In addition, 1,000 randomly selected compounds of each scaffold were analyzed for drug likeness (Supporting Information, Figures S1–S8). Around 75% of these compounds pass at least 3 criteria of Lipinski’s rule of five. Although a majority of these compounds have a molecular weight above 500 Da (mean MW: 6 = 553 ± 85 Da., 9 = 578 ± 62 Da., 12 = 463 ± 56 Da., 16 = 601 ± 71 Da.), it has to be mentioned that our AnchorQuery libraries are targeted specifically for PPIs. The molecular weight of potential inhibitors will most likely need to be larger than compounds targeting classical protein pockets.23 Work is ongoing to profile the herein described scaffolds and its chemical space for small molecule inhibitors of protein-protein interactions.

Supplementary Material

1_si_001

Acknowledgment

This work was supported partially by grants from NIH (1R21GM087617-01A1, 1P41GM094055-01, and 1R01GM09708201). The assistance of Valerie Nolt and Neal McCall are acknowledged.

Footnotes

Supporting Information Available. Experimental procedures including the synthesis and characterizations of small molecules, as well as the analysis of virtual libraries are provided. This material is available free of charge via the internet at http://pubs.acs.org.

References

  • 1.Sternbach LH. J. Med. Chem. 1979;22:1. doi: 10.1021/jm00187a001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.(a) Duarte CD, Barreiro EJ, Fraga CAM. Mini-Rev. Med. Chem. 2007;7:1108–1119. doi: 10.2174/138955707782331722. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Welsch ME, Snyder SA, Stockwell BR. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2010;14:347. doi: 10.1016/j.cbpa.2010.02.018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Hadjipavlou-Litina D, Hansch C. Chem. Rev. 1994;94:1483. doi: 10.1021/cr0304469. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Loew GH, Nienow JR, Poulsen M. Mol. Pharmacol. 1984;26:19. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Spencer J, Rathnam RP, Chowdhry BZ. Future Med. Chem. 2010;2:1441. doi: 10.4155/fmc.10.226. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.(a) Dömling A, Wang W, Wang K. Chem. Rev. 2012;112:3083. doi: 10.1021/cr100233r. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Dömling A, Huang Y. Synthesis. 2010:2859. [Google Scholar]; (c) Ruijter E, Scheffelaar R, Orru R. Angew. Chem. Intl. Ed. Engl. 2011;28:6234. doi: 10.1002/anie.201006515. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) Hulme C, Dietrich J. Mol. Div. 2009;13:195. doi: 10.1007/s11030-009-9111-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (e) Armstrong RW, Combs AP, Tempest PA, Brown SD, Keating TA. Acc. Chem. Res. 1996;29:123. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.(a) Archer GA, Sternbach LH. Chem. Rev. 1968;68:747. [Google Scholar]; (b) Bunin BA, Ellman JA. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992;114:10997. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Huang Y, Dömling A. In: Isocyanide Chemistry. Nenajdenko V, editor. New York: Wiley; 2012. pp. 431–450. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Khoury K, Sinha MK, Nagashima T, Herdtweck E, Dömling A. Angew. Chem. Intl. Ed. Engl. 2012;51:10280. doi: 10.1002/anie.201205366. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.(a) Nixey T, Hulme C. Tetrahedron Lett. 2002;43:6833. [Google Scholar]; (b) Kercher T, Rao C, Bencsik JR, Josey JA. J. Comb. Chem. 2007;9:1177. doi: 10.1021/cc0700290. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.(a) Hulme C, Ma L, Romano J, Morrissette M. Tetrahedron Lett. 1999;40:7925–7928. [Google Scholar]; (b) Nixey T, Kelly M, Semin D, Hulme C. Tetrahedron Lett. 2002;43:3681. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Keating TA, Armstrong RW. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996;118:2574. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.for other examples of UDC, see: Umkehrer M, Kolb J, Burdack C, Ross G, Hiller W. Tetrahedron Lett. 2004;45:6421. Bonnaterre F, Bois-Choussy M, Zhu J. Beil. J. Org. Chem. 2008;4:10. doi: 10.3762/bjoc.4.10. Ilyin AP, Parchinski VZ, Peregudova JN, Trifilenkov AS, Poutsykina EB, Tkachenko SE, Kravchenko DV, Ivachtchenko AV. Tetrahedron Lett. 2006;47:2649.
  • 14.(a) Chung C-w, Coste H, White JH, Mirguet O, Wilde J, Gosmini RL, Delves C, Magny SM, Woodward R, Hughes SA, Boursier EV, Flynn H, Bouillot AM, Bamborough P, Brusq J-MG, Gellibert FJ, Jones EJ, Riou AM, Homes P, Martin SL, Uings IJ, Toum J, Clement CA, Boullay A-B, Grimley RL, Blandel FM, Prinjha RK, Lee K, Kirilovsky J, Nicodeme E. J. Med. Chem. 2011;54:3827. doi: 10.1021/jm200108t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Lecinska P, Corres N, Moreno D, García-Valverde M, Marcaccini S, Torroba T. Tetrahedron. 2010;66:6783. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.(a) Gordon CP, Young KA, Hizartzidis L, Deane FM, McCluskey A. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2011;9:1419. doi: 10.1039/c0ob00029a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) He P, Nie Y-B, Wu J, Ding M-W. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2011;9:1429. doi: 10.1039/c0ob00855a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Marcaccini S, Pepino R, Pozo MC, Basurto S, Garcia-Valverde M, Torroba T. Tetrahedron Lett. 2004;45:3999. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Tye H, Whittaker M. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2004;2:813. doi: 10.1039/b400298a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.(a) Meireles LMC, Dömling A, Camacho CJ. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010;38:W407. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkq502. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Czarna A, Beck B, Srivastava S, Popowicz GM, Wolf S, Huang Y, Bista M, Holak TA, Dömling A. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2010;49:5352. doi: 10.1002/anie.201001343. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.(a) Huang Y, Wolf S, Bista M, Meireles L, Camacho C, Holak TA, Dömling A. Chem. Biol. Drug Des. 2010;76:116. doi: 10.1111/j.1747-0285.2010.00989.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Huang Y, Wolf S, Koes D, Popowicz GM, Camacho CJ, Holak TA, Dömling A. ChemMedChem. 2012;7:49. doi: 10.1002/cmdc.201100428. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.(a) Hulme C, Cherrier MP. Tetrahedron Lett. 1999;40:5295. [Google Scholar]; (b) Lecinska P, Corres N, Moreno D, Garcia-Valverde M, Marcaccini S, Torroba T. Tetrahedron. 2010;66:6783. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Bunin BA, Ellman JA. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992;114:10997. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.(a) Grasberger BL, Lu T, Schubert C, Parks DJ, Carver TE, Koblish HK, Cummings MD, LaFrance LV, Milkiewicz KL, Calvo RR, Maguire D, Lattanze J, Franks CF, Zhao S, Ramachandren K, Bylebyl GR, Zhang M, Manthey CL, Petrella EC, Pantoliano MW, Deckman IC, Spurlino JC, Maroney AC, Tomczuk BE, Molloy CJ, Bone RF. J. Med. Chem. 2005;48:909. doi: 10.1021/jm049137g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Nicodeme E, Jeffrey KL, Schaefer U, Beinke S, Dewell S, Chung CW, Chandwani R, Marazzi I, Wilson P, Coste H, White J, Kirilovsky J, Rice CM, Lora JM, Prinjha RK, Lee K, Tarakhovsky A. Nature. 2010;468:1119. doi: 10.1038/nature09589. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Koes D, Khoury K, Huang Y, Wang W, Bista M, Popowicz GM, Wolf S, Holak T, Dömling A, Camacho CJ. PLoS One. 2012;7:e32839. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0032839. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Wells JA, McClendon CL. Nature. 2007;450:1001. doi: 10.1038/nature06526. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

1_si_001

RESOURCES