Skip to main content
Journal of Experimental Botany logoLink to Journal of Experimental Botany
. 2013 Jul 11;64(11):3453–3466. doi: 10.1093/jxb/ert187

OsbZIP58, a basic leucine zipper transcription factor, regulates starch biosynthesis in rice endosperm

Jie-Chen Wang 1, Heng Xu 2, Ying Zhu 2, Qiao-Quan Liu 3, Xiu-Ling Cai 1,*
PMCID: PMC3733163  PMID: 23846875

Abstract

Starch composition and the amount in endosperm, both of which contribute dramatically to seed yield, cooking quality, and taste in cereals, are determined by a series of complex biochemical reactions. However, the mechanism regulating starch biosynthesis in cereal seeds is not well understood. This study showed that OsbZIP58, a bZIP transcription factor, is a key transcriptional regulator controlling starch synthesis in rice endosperm. OsbZIP58 was expressed mainly in endosperm during active starch synthesis. osbzip58 null mutants displayed abnormal seed morphology with altered starch accumulation in the white belly region and decreased amounts of total starch and amylose. Moreover, osbzip58 had a higher proportion of short chains and a lower proportion of intermediate chains of amylopectin. Furthermore, OsbZIP58 was shown to bind directly to the promoters of six starch-synthesizing genes, OsAGPL3, Wx, OsSSIIa, SBE1, OsBEIIb, and ISA2, and to regulate their expression. These findings indicate that OsbZIP58 functions as a key regulator of starch synthesis in rice seeds and provide new insights into seed quality control.

Key words: Endosperm, coordination, OsbZIP58, rice, starch biosynthesis.

Introduction

Starch, the most abundant reserve polysaccharide in nature, mainly comprises amylose and amylopectin. Amylose is a linear molecule containing α-1,4-linked d-glucopyranosyl units, and amylopectin consists of short α-1,4-linked d-glucosyl chains with 5–6% α-1,6 bonds (Juliano, 1998; Smith, 1999). In crop plants, a large portion of starch is deposited in storage tissues, such as the endosperm in rice and maize, accounting for the main carbon sources for humans and livestock (Burrell, 2003).

Starch biosynthesis in plant seeds includes a series of complex and coordinated biochemical reactions. Multiple enzymes such as ADP-glucose pyrophosphorylase (AGPase), plastidial starch phosphorylase (PHO), granule-bound starch synthase [GBSS, also called Waxy (Wx)], soluble starch synthase (SS), starch branching enzyme (SBE), and starch debranching enzyme (DBE) are involved in this procedure (Hannah and James, 2008; James et al., 2003; Jeon et al., 2010). At the first step of starch biosynthesis, AGPase catalyses the conversion of glucose-1-phosphate into ADP-glucose, and PHO is hypothesized to play an important role in the glucan initiation process by synthesizing glucan primers with long degrees of polymerization (DP). GBSSI/Wx is responsible for amylose synthesis. Amylopectin biosynthesis is controlled by a series of starch biosynthetic enzymes such as SS, SBE, and DBE in the cereal endosperm (Tian et al., 2009). Rice seed development can be divided into four stages: the initiation stage [1–3 d after flowering (DAF)], during which starch is synthesized exclusively in the pericarp; the early developmental stage (3–5 DAF), indicated by endosperm starch accumulation with an obvious increase in seed weight; the middle stage (5–10 DAF), with a rapid increase in starch deposition and grain weight; and the late stage (10 DAF and beyond), in which seed maturation occurs (Counce et al., 2000). Among the rice genes involved in starch biosynthesis, 14 genes, including AGPase (OsAGPL3, OsAGPS2b, OsAGPL2), PHO (PHOL/OsPHO1), GBSS (OsGBSSI/Wx), SS (OsSSI, OsSSIIa, OsSSIIIa, OsSSIVb), SBE (OsBEI/SBE1, OsBEIIb), and DBE (OsISA1,OsISA2, OsPUL), exhibit high levels of expression at approximately 5–7 DAF (Hirose and Terao, 2004; Dian et al., 2005; Ohdan et al., 2005), suggesting that these genes are closely associated with starch accumulation in rice seeds. Changes in the expression level of various starch biosynthetic enzymes are closely associated with the physicochemical properties of starch in rice endosperm. Moreover, amylose content is one of the key factors used for evaluating rice grain quality (Fitzgerald et al., 2009; Jeon et al., 2010). However, how these genes are regulated during rice seed development remains poorly understood.

The rice Wx gene encodes the OsGBSSI, a key enzyme for amylose synthesis in rice endosperm; wx mutants almost completely lack amylose (Sano et al., 1985). The expression of Wx is regulated at the transcriptional and post-transcriptional levels. The MYC transcriptional factor OsBP-5 can form a heterodimer with an ethylene-responsive element binding protein (EREBP), OsEBP-89, to regulate Wx expression synergistically. Knockdown of OsBP-5 using RNA interference results in reduced expression of Wx, leading to a reduction in the amylose content of mature seeds (Zhu et al., 2003). RSp29 and RSZp23, two Ser/Arg-rich proteins, have been shown to enhance the splicing of the Wxb mRNA precursor and alter the alternative 5ʹ splicing site of Wx at the intron 1 position (Isshiki et al., 2006). Du1, a member of the pre-mRNA processing complex, is also able to affect the splicing efficiency of Wxb pre-mRNA and regulate starch biosynthesis (Zeng et al., 2007). Moreover, nuclear proteins extracted from immature rice seeds bind DNA motifs in the Wx promoter (Chen et al., 1996a). In addition to the regulators of the Wx gene, other factors involved in starch synthesis have also been reported. For example, FLOURY ENDOSPERM2 (FLO2), encoding a protein with a tetratricopeptide repeat motif, regulates rice grain size and starch quality in the endosperm (She et al., 2010). FLO2 may interact with a basic helix–loop–helix protein to directly or indirectly modulate the expression of genes involved in the production of storage starch and storage proteins (She et al., 2010). RSR1, an AP2/EREBP family transcription factor, negatively regulates the seed-specific expression of genes involved in starch metabolism, and mutation of RSR1 results in enhanced expression of all type I starch synthesis genes in seeds (Fu and Xue, 2010). Nevertheless, many questions regarding the regulation of starch biosynthesis in rice endosperm remain unanswered.

REB [rice endosperm basic leucine zipper (bZIP)/OsbZIP33] interacts with the ACGT elements in the promoters of both Wx and SBE1 and is involved in starch synthesis (Cai et al., 2002). RITA (rice transcription activator-1)/OsbZIP20 (Izawa et al., 1994) and RISBZ1/OsbZIP58 (Onodera et al., 2001) bind to the ACGT element in vitro. In addition, RISBZ1/OsbZIP58 regulates seed storage protein synthesis (Yamamoto et al., 2006; Kawakatsu et al., 2009) and free lysine content (Kawakatsu and Takaiwa, 2010). All of these reports indicate that some seed-specific bZIP proteins may be involved in the regulation of starch synthesis in the endosperm.

In this study, we determined that four bZIP transcription factors including OsbZIP58 are capable of binding to the promoters of both Wx and SBE1. osbzip58 seeds exhibited defects in starch composition and morphology, and altered expression of starch biosynthetic genes. This study reveals a new function of OsbZIP58 in starch synthesis in rice seeds.

Materials and methods

Plant materials

Japonica rice (Oryza sativa L.) cultivar Dongjin and osbzip58-1 (PFG_1B-15317.R) and osbzip58-2 (PFG_3A-09093.R) were obtained from Pohang University of Science and Technology, Korea (Jeong et al., 2002). The genetic backgrounds of these two mutants are the japonica rice cultivar Dongjin. The plants were grown during the summer under natural environmental conditions in the Song Jiang experimental field at the Shanghai Institute of Plant Physiology and Ecology, China, or in plastic pots filled with paddy field soil in a greenhouse under a 13h light (28 °C)/11h dark (26 °C) photoperiod.

Cloning of OsbZIPs and yeast one-hybrid assays

The open reading frames (ORFs) of ten OsbZIP transcription factor genes were cloned by reverse transcription (RT)-PCR using RNA from immature seeds of rice japonica variety Zhonghua 11 (ZH11) with primers designed according to the MSU coding sequences (Table 1 and Supplementary Table S1 at JXB online). The genes were confirmed by sequencing analysis and subsequently fused in frame to yeast GAL4-AD to construct the pPC86-bZIP plasmids (Invitrogen; Fig. 1A).

Table 1.

Information about OsbZIP genes used for binding activity assay. The data are based on information from http://signal.salk.edu/cgi-bin/RiceGE

OsbZIP no. MSU locus ID Alternate name Gene expression pattern ORF (bp)
OsbZIP15 LOC_Os02g07840 RISBZ4 Universal, increased in seed 837
OisbZIP20 LOC_Os02g16680 RITA-1,RISBZ3 Universal 897
OsbZIP33 LOC_Os03g58250 REB,RISBZ2 Universal 1278
OsbZIP34 LOC_Os03g59460 Specific in seed 990
OsbZIP35 LOC_Os04g10260 Specific in seed 1281
OsbZIP40 LOC_Os05g36160 Universal, increased in seed 804
OsbZIP50 LOC_Os06g41770 Universal, increased in seed 1119
OsbZIP52 LOC_Os06g45140 RISBZ5 Universal, increased in seed 888
OsbZIP58 LOC_Os07g08420 RISBZ1 Specific in seed 1311
OsbZIP76 LOC_Os09g34880 Specific in seed 1125

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Assay of binding of OsbZIP transcription factors to the Ha-2 fragment of the Wx promoter and the C53 fragment of the SBE1 promoter in yeast. (A) Diagram of the p178-C53/p178-Ha2 reporter constructs and pPC86-bZIP bait construct. P CYC1, the minimal promoter of the yeast cytochrome C1 gene; GAL4 AD, GAL4 activation domain; P ADH1, a constitutively active ADH1 promoter; T ADH1, ADH1 transcription termination signal. (B) Detection of interaction between OsbZIP transcription factors and the chimeric promoters by yeast one-hybrid analysis. The blue yeast colonies indicate positive interactions. (C) Quantitative assays of β-galactosidase (β-gal) activity in different yeast transformants. Data are presented as means ±standard deviation (SD) from six replicates in two assays. Light grey columns indicate pPC86-bZIP transformed into EGY48 (p178-Ha2); dark grey columns indicate pPC86-bZIP transformed into EGY48 (p178-C53). (This figure is available in colour at JXB online.)

The reporter construct p178 was generated by modifying the plasmid pLGD-265UP1, which contains the CYC1 core promoter and the lacZ gene (Chen et al., 1996b). The Ha-2 fragment was from the Wx promoter (LOC Os06g04200, s1651–1399) and the C53 fragment was from the SBE1 promoter (LOC_Os06g51084, L116OC_O. Yeast strain EGY48 (MATα, trp1, his3-, ura3 -, leu2::6 LexAops-LEU2; Invitrogen) was used for transformation. The yeast assays were performed according to the manufacturer’s protocol with the substrate chlorophenol red-β-d-galactopyranoside (Matchmaker One-hybrid System; Clontech).

To test the binding ability of OsbZIP58 to the 15 fragments in the promoter of ten rice starch biosynthetic genes (Supplementary Table S2 at JXB online), two copies of the fragments were amplified and inserted into the XhoI site of the p178 vector in front of pCYC1 (iso-1-cytochrome c) to generate reporter plasmids. Yeast strain EGY48 was transformed with the vector pPC86-OsbZIP58 and one of the 15 reporter plasmids per transformation, and colonies were selected on selection plates (SD/–Ura–Trp+X-gal).

Isolation of OsbZIP58 mutants

Two alleles of OsbZIP58 mutants, PFG_1B-15317.R and PFG_3A-09093.R, were identified from the rice T-DNA Insertion Sequence Database (Jeong et al., 2002; http://signal.salk.edu/cgi-bin/RiceGE).

Complementation of the osbzip58-1 mutant

A 6149 nt genomic fragment of the wild-type plant corresponding to LOC_Os07g08420 containing the region between –1843 and +4281 was cloned into the binary vector pCAMBIA2300 and this resultant construct was introduced into Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain EHA105 and subsequently transfected into immature embryos of osbzip58-1 by Agrobacterium-mediated transformation as described previously (Liu et al., 1998).

Observation of starch granules of endosperm

The starch granules were observed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) (JSM-6360LV; JEOL) according to the methods of (Fu & Xue, 2010).

Anatomical analysis

Immature seeds were fixed in 50% FAA (50% ethanol, 10% formaldehyde, 5% acetic acid) at 4 °C overnight after vacuum infiltration. After serial dehydration in several concentrations of ethanol, the samples were embedded in epoxide resin and cut into 2–3 μm sections. Strips of these sections were spread on a 42 °C platform and incubated overnight, stained with 0.5% toluidine blue, and sealed for observation under a microscope (BX51 plus DP70; Olympus).

Measurement of grain quality

Embryos and pericarps were removed from the dehulled grains, and the endosperms were ground to a powder. The starch content was measured using a starch assay kit (K-TSTA; Megazyme) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Apparent amylose content (AAC) was measured according to the method described by Tan et al. (1999). For analysis of soluble sugars with anthrone reagent, 50mg of powder was washed twice in 80% (v/v) ethanol at 80 °C for 40min. The supernatant was collected and diluted to a volume of 15ml with water. An aliquot (0.1–0.3ml) of this solution was analysed for sugar content using the anthrone method.

To determine the chain length distributions of amylopectin, 5mg of rice powder was digested with Pseudomonas amyloderamosa isoamylase (Sigma-Aldrich) and then analysed by high-performance anion-exchange chromatography with pulsed amperometric detection (HPAEC-PAD) using an ICS3000 model (Dionex) equipped with a pulsed amperometric detector and a CarboPac PA-20 column (Nagamine and Komae, 1996).

In situ hybridization

Non-radioactive in situ hybridization was performed as described previously (Dong et al., 2005). For synthesis of OsbZIP58 RNA probes, a gene-specific fragment (nt 1–699) was amplified with primers GE0336 and GE0311 (Supplementary Table S1) and cloned into the pSK vector (Stratagene).

RT-PCR and quantitative (q)RT-PCR analysis

Seed samples used for RT-PCR and qRT-PCR were obtained from greenhouse-grown plants; the spikelets were harvested at 3, 5, 7, 10, 15, and 20 DAF. Seed samples were immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at –80°C until use. Total RNA was extracted from immature rice seeds with RNAplant plus reagent (Tiangen) and treated with RNase-free DNaseI (TaKaRa). Two micrograms of total RNA were used for first-strand cDNA synthesis with an oligo-dT primer and an ImProm-IITM Reverse Transcription System (Promega).

For RT-PCR, OsACT1 was amplified with primers GE0013 and GE0014 as an internal control. OsbZIP58 was amplified with primers GE0332 and GE0333. The primer sequences are listed in Supplementary Table S1.

The qRT-PCR was performed using SYBR® Premix Ex Taq™ (TaKaRa) on a Bio-Rad My-IQ 2 system (Bio-Rad). The reactions were performed following the manufacturer’s protocol. Each real-time PCR analysis was repeated five times. The expression level of each gene was normalized to UBQ10 as the reference. Of the ten housekeeping genes, UBQ10 exhibits the most stable expression in immature seeds of different stages (Jain et al., 2006). The starch synthesis genes were amplified as described previously (Ohdan et al., 2005). The primer sequences are listed in Supplementary Table S1.

Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) PCR

Antibodies were raised in rabbit against a purified fusion protein produced with vector pET32a, corresponding to aa 1–233 of OsbZIP58 (using the primer sequences listed in Supplementary Table S1). The antibodies were affinity purified, and 10 μl aliquots were used for the ChIP experiments. The DNA–protein complex was isolated at 7 DAF from immature rice seeds according to the method of Haring et al. (2007), and DNA was released using the method in the Chromatin Immunoprecipitation kit (Millipore) handbook. Relative enrichment was measured by comparing the input and ChIP values. Normal rabbit IgG was used for the negative control Ab. The Actin1 ORF (GenBank accession no. AK100267) was used as a negative control sequence. All primers used in the ChIP assays are listed in Supplementary Table S2.

Results

OsbZIP transcription factors bind the promoters of Wx and SBE1

Our previous study revealed that nuclear proteins extracted from immature rice endosperm can specifically bind to the 53bp (C53) DNA fragment located in the 5ʹ upstream region of SBE1, and the Ha-2 fragment of Wx can compete with this binding activity, suggested that the biosynthesis of amylose and amylopection may be co-regulated by certain factors such as REB (Cai et al., 2002).

To identify the transcription factors that regulate both amylose and amylopectin synthesis, we generated two fused constructs: p178-Ha2, containing two copies of the Ha-2 fragment of the Wx promoter with three ACGT elements inserted at the 5ʹ end of pCYC1 mini-promoter, and p178-C53, containing two copies of the C53 fragment of the SBE1 promoter with two ACGT elements inserted at the 5ʹ end of pCYC1 mini-promoter (Fig. 1A). Previous expression analysis has shown that there are ten bZIP transcriptional factors that are either homologous with REB/OsbZIP33 or have seed-specific expression patterns (http://signal.salk.edu/cgi-bin/RiceGE) (Onodera et al., 2001; Nijhawan et al., 2008) (Table 1). To test whether these ten OsbZIPs were capable of binding to the two cis elements Ha-2 and C53, we performed yeast one-hybrid analysis using pPC86-bZIP vectors, which individually contain the ORFs of these genes fused in frame with yeast GAL4-AD (Fig. 1A). Compared with the controls, four of OsbZIPs – OsbZIP20, REB/OsbZIP33, OsbZIP34, and OsbZIP58 – induced higher expression of β-galactosidase activity in both EGY48 (p178-Ha2) and EGY48 (p178-C53), while OsbZIP50 and OsbZIP52 slightly induced β-galactosidase activity in EGY48 (p178-Ha2) but not in EGY48 (p178-C53) (Fig. 1B, C). These results suggested that OsbZIP20, REB/OsbZIP33, OsbZIP34, and OsbZIP58 can bind to both the Ha-2 and C53 fragments and may regulate the expression of Wx and SBE1.

Seeds of osbzip58s display altered starch accumulation

To determine the function of these four OsbZIPs in seed starch accumulation, we searched the T-DNA insertion mutant database (Jeong et al., 2002) and the rice Tos17 retrotransposon insertion database (Miyao et al., 2007) and obtained six mutant lines (Table 2). Among these, two T-DNA insertion lines of OsbZIP58, osbzip58-1 (PFG_1B-15317.R) and osbzip58-2 (PFG_3A-09093.R), both harboured a pGA2715 T-DNA insertion in the first intron of OsbZIP58 (Fig. 2A). Homozygotes of these two mutants were isolated by PCR screening from the segregating progeny populations (Fig. 2A). Southern blot analysis revealed the presence of a single T-DNA insertion in homozygous plants (Supplementary Fig. S1A at JXB online), and all of these plants exhibited white, floury endosperm (Fig. 3E, I). No transcripts from OsbZIP58 were detected by RT-PCR in 7 DAF seeds of the homozygous mutants, while they were detected in the heterozygous and in wild-type plants (Supplementary Fig. S1B), suggesting that the expression of OsbZIP58 was completely abolished by the T-DNA insertion in the two mutant lines.

Table 2.

Information about OsbZIP mutant lines. ND0017 and ND0015 are from the rice Tos17 retrotransposon insertion database (http://www.rgrc.dna.affrc.go.jp/)

The other mutants were obtained from Pohang University of Science and Technology (Korea) (http://www.postech.ac.kr/life/pfg/risd/index.html).

Gene Name Mutant line Insertion site Background Phenotype
OsbZIP20 PFG_2A-00762.L 5th exon Hwayoung Viviparous
OsbZIP33 PFG_2A-40577.L 1st intron Dongjin Dwarf
OsbZIP34 ND0017 8th exon Nipponbare Normal
ND0075 7th intron Nipponbare Normal
OsbZIP58 PFG_1B-15317.R 1st intron Dongjin White belly seeds
PFG_3A-09093.R 1st intron Dongjin White belly seeds

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Gene structure of OsbZIP58, and grain size and weight of the osbzip58 mutants and CLs. The CLs are transformants containing a wild-type OsbZIP58 gene in the osbzip58-1 mutant background. (A) Diagram of the OsbZIP58 gene structure and T-DNA insertion positions in osbzip58-1 (PFG_1B-15317.R) and osbzip58-2 (PFG_3A-09093.R). Exons are shown as black boxes. Both mutants had a T-DNA insert in the first intron. Primers used in the genotype analysis are indicated by black arrows. GE0279 and GE0301 are gene-specific primers, and GE0295 is the T-DNA specific-primer. (B–E) Grain weight (B), grain length (C), grain width (D), and grain thickness (E). Fifty seeds were analysed for seed size, and data are presented as means ±SD. The 1000-grain weight was determined by counting ten replicates of 100-grain samples independently on an electronic balance. Data are shown as mean ±sd. Two-tailed unpaired tests indicate significant differences in 1000-grain weight and seed size. **P <0.01.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

Altered seeds phenotype of the osbzip58 mutants and CLs. (A–D) Dongjin; (E–H) osbzip58-1; (I–L) osbzip58-2; (M–P) CL1; (Q–T) CL2. The appearance of mature seeds is shown in (A), (E), (I), (M) and (Q). Cross-sections of mature seeds are shown in (B), (F), (J), (N) and (R). SEM of the central area of mature endosperm is shown in (C), (G), (K), (O) and (S), from the cross-sections in (B), (F), (J), (N), and (R), respectively, indicated by a red square. SEM of the ventral area of mature endosperm is shown in (D), (H), (L), (P) and (T), from the cross-sections in (B), (F), (J), (N), and (R), respectively, indicated by a blue square. Bars: 1mm (A, B, E, F, I, J, M, N, Q, R; 10 μm (C, D, G, H, K, L, O, P, S, T).

The two osbzip58 mutants showed several defective seed phenotypes, including reduced mass per 1000 seeds, reduced grain width, abnormal seed shape, and a white belly, which is a floury-white core that occupies the centre to the ventral region of the seed; (Figs 2BE and 3F, J). The osbzip58-1 mutant also had an apparently shrunken belly in the grain (Fig. 3E). SEM images of transverse sections of osbzip58-1 and osbzip58-2 grains indicated that the dorsal endosperm consisted of densely packed, polyhedral starch granules (Fig. 3G, K), which were similar to those of the wild-type Dongjin (Fig. 3C, D), while the ventral endosperm was filled with loosely packed, spherical starch granules with large air spaces (Fig. 3H, L), corresponding to the chalky region of endosperm. The morphology of starch granules in the ventral regions of the immature osbzip58-1 seeds was analysed in semi-thin sections. Endosperm cells of the wild type were full of amyloplasts, and each amyloplast consisted of densely packed starch granules (Fig. 4A, C), while in endosperm cells of osbzip58-1, the envelope of the amyloplast was not distinct, and starch granules were loosely packed and spread apart (Fig. 4B, D). This phenotype is consistent with the phenotype of mature seeds observed by SEM. In addition, the number of proteosomes was significantly reduced in the osbzip58-1 endosperm (Fig. 4B, D). These analyses indicated that the mutant seeds exhibited altered starch accumulation. The changes in starch granule morphology in the osbzip58 mutants may have resulted in grain morphology defects.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4.

Altered starch granules morphology in the wild-type Dongjin and the osbzip58-1 mutant examined using semi-thin sections. Immature seeds were fixed in FAA and stained with ammonium methylbenzene blue. (A, C) Dongjin; (B, D) osbzip58-1. (A, B) 10 DAF; (C, D) 15 DAF. a, Amyloplast; c, endosperm cell; p, protein body; s, starch granule. Bars, 50 μm.

To further confirm the phenotype of osbzip58, we introduced a wild-type copy of OsbZIP58 into the osbizp58-1 mutant. Forty-four independent transgenic lines were obtained, 20 of which exhibited a nearly wild-type seed phenotype. Two complemented lines (CL1 and CL2) with single insertions (Supplementary Fig. S1C) were chosen for further analysis. The two CL set seeds had normal sizes and shapes (Figs 2BE and 3M, Q). Transverse sections of CL grains revealed normal to slight chalkiness in the ventral region (Fig. 3N, R). SEM of transverse sections of CL grains in the ventral region showed that most of the starch granules were densely packed and regularly polyhedral (Fig. 3P, T), which was similar to those of the wild-type Dongjin (Fig. 3C, D). The expression of OsbZIP58 in the CL lines was also restored to wild-type levels (Supplementary Fig. S1D). These results indicated that the defective seed phenotype was caused by the OsbZIP58 mutation.

Disruption of OsbZIP58 alters the starch content and chain length distribution of amylopectin

To understand further the role of OsbZIP58 in starch synthesis, we measured the seed starch content and the chain length distribution of amylopectin. Total starch content and AAC in the osbzip58-1 and osbzip58-2 mutants were slightly decreased compared with those in the wild type (Fig. 5A, B), while the soluble sugar content was significantly increased in the mutants (Fig. 5C). The total starch content, AAC, and soluble sugar content in the seeds of the two CLs were mostly similar to wild-type levels. To examine the changes in the fine structure of amylopectin caused by altered expression of OsbZIP58, we determined the chain length distribution of the endosperm starch in the wild type, two osbzip58 mutants, and two CLs using HPAEC-PAD followed by isoamylase debranching (Nagamine and Komae, 1996; Yamakawa et al., 2007). Compared with the wild-type Dongjin, the osbzip58 mutants had a higher proportion of short chains with DP values between 6 and 11, and a lower proportion of intermediate chains with DP values between 13 and 21 (Fig. 5D). In the two CLs, the distribution profile of short and intermediate chains of amylopectin shifted towards that of the wild type (Fig. 5E). These data confirmed that the altered starch content and chain length distribution of amylopectin were caused by the OsbZIP58 mutation. The altered composition and structure of starch suggested that OsbZIP58 modulates not only amylose but also amylopectin synthesis, especially α-1,4 chain elongation of amylopectin, which comprises several concerted reactions catalysed by distinct SS, SBE, and DBE isoforms.

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5.

Altered starch content and fine structure of amylopectin in mutants of OsbZIP58. (A) Total starch content in endosperm (n=5). (B) Apparent amylose content in endosperm (n=5). (C) Soluble sugar content in endosperm (n=5). (D) Differences in the chain length distributions between Dongjin and osbzip58-1 / osbzip58-2. (E) Differences in the chain length distributions between Dongjin and CL1/CL2.

Expression pattern of OsbZIP58

To understand further the role of OsbZIP58, RT-PCR analysis was performed to determine the expression pattern of OsbZIP58. The expression of OsbZIP58 was specifically in seeds, with a maximum expression level at 5–10 DAF (Fig. 6A). In addition, in situ hybridization showed that, at 5 DAF, the expression of OsbZIP58 was detected at a relatively high level in the pericarp and weakly in the endosperm (Fig. 6B). At 7 DAF, OsbZIP58 mRNA expression appeared to increase in the central region of the endosperm and decreased in the pericarp (Fig. 6C). In addition, OsbZIP58 mRNA was detected in the dorsal vascular bundles of rice grains at 5 DAF. No signal was observed in these tissues using the sense probe (Fig. 6D). Some genes functioning in starch biosynthesis, such as OsSSI, OsSSIIa, and OsSSIIIa, are expressed in the pericarp at the early stage of seed development and are increasingly expressed in the endosperm at the middle stage of seed development (Hirose and Terao, 2004). The similar expression pattern of these genes and OsbZIP58 suggests that OsbZIP58 plays a role in regulating storage starch biosynthesis.

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6.

Expression pattern of OsbZIP58. (A) Expression patterns of OsbZIP58 in roots, stems, leaves, flowers, seedlings, and seeds analysed by qRT-PCR. The developmental stage of the seed is indicated by DAF. Rice OsAct1 was used as a control. (B, C) Detection of OsbZIP58 mRNA in cross-sections of a maturing rice seed by in situ hybridization at 5 DAF (B) and 7 DAF (C). The region expressing OsbZIP58 is shown in purple. Antisense strand was used as a probe. (D) In situ hybridization with a sense-strand probe in maturing rice seed at 7 DAF. P, Pericarp; DV, dorsal vascular; E, endosperm. Bars, 100 μm (B); 200 μm (C, D).

OsbZIP58 regulates the expression of starch biosynthetic genes in rice endosperm

To understand how OsbZIP58 regulates starch synthesis, we examined the expression of 14 starch synthesis genes in the osbzip58-1 mutant using qRT-PCR. Compared with the wild type, these 14 genes displayed four groups of altered expression profiles in osbzip58-1 from 5 to 15 DAF during the grain-filling stage. Thus, the expression of OsAGPS2b, OsAGPL2, OsSSI, OsSSIIIa, OsSSIVb, OsBEIIb, and OsISA2 was obviously upregulated, while expression of OsAGPL3, OsPHO1, Wx, and SBE1 was obviously downregulated. The expression of OsISA1 and OsPUL was upregulated from 5 to 7 DAF but subsequently downregulated, and there was no significant change for OsSSIIa from 5 to 15 DAF (Fig. 7). These data revealed that OsbZIP58 regulates the expression of most starch synthesis genes in rice seeds during the grain-filling stage.

Fig. 7.

Fig. 7.

Expression profiles of rice starch synthesis genes during seed development in wild-type Dongjin and osbzip58-1 mutant. Total RNA was extracted from seeds at 3, 5, 7, 10, 15, and 20 DAF. The expression of each gene in the 3 DAF seeds of Dongjin was used as a control. All data are shown as means ±SD from five biological replicates. Two-tailed unpaired t-tests were used to determine significant differences. *P <0.05; **P <0.01.

OsbZIP58 directly regulates genes involved in starch biosynthesis

To reveal whether OsbZIP58 was capable of directly binding to the promoter sequences of starch biosynthetic genes, we examined the distribution of ACGT elements in the promoters of the 14 rice starch biosynthetic genes including genes encoding AGPase, PHO, GBSS, SS, SBE, and DBE, which exhibit a high level of expression at approximately 5–7 DAF during seed development (Hirose and Terao, 2004; Dian et al., 2005; Ohdan et al., 2005). The region from –2000bp upstream of the putative transcription initiation site to the translation start site ATG was used to search for ACGT elements for each gene. Fifteen fragments were observed to contain three or more copies of the ACGT element within 300bp 5ʹ of transcription initiation in ten genes. Strikingly, the Wx promoter contained 16 ACGT elements in the 300bp fragments (Fig. 8A and Supplementary Table S2). The high frequency of the ACGT elements in rice starch biosynthetic genes suggested that these genes may be coordinately regulated by the same transcription factors via their common cis element.

Fig. 8.

Fig. 8.

OsbZIP58 broadly bind to the promoters of rice starch metabolism genes in vivo. (A) Diagram of the promoter region from –2000bp upstream of the putative transcription initiation site to the translation start site ATG in the ten rice starch metabolism genes. Vertical black lines indicate the ACGT elements. Arrowheads indicate the putative transcription initiation site. Vertical arrows indicate the translation start site ATG. PCR fragments are indicated by thick lines. (B) Quantitative real-time PCR assay of chromatin immunoprecipitated DNA. Normal rabbit IgG was used for the negative control. ‘% input’ represents the qPCR signals that were derived from the ChIP samples versus qPCR signals that were derived from the input sample taken early during the ChIP procedure. All data are shown as means ±SD from six biological replicates. Two-tailed unpaired t-tests were used to determine significant differences. *P <0.05; **P <0.01. (C) Detection of interactions between OsbZIP58 and the chimaeric promoters by yeast one-hybrid analysis. The plasmids pPC86-OsbZIP58 and p178 were transformed into EGY48, and colonies were selected on selection medium (SD/–Ura–Trp+X-gal). The blue yeast colonies indicate positive interactions. (D) Quantitative assays of β-galactosidase (β-gal) activity in different yeast transformants. Data are presented as means ±SD from six replicates in two assays. (This figure is available in colour at JXB online.)

We used ChIP assays to examine whether OsbZIP58 bound to the promoters of in vivo. A specific antibody against OsbZIP58 demonstrated by Western blot analysis (Supplementary Fig. S2 at JXB online) was used for pulling down the OsbZIP58-associated complex from immature rice seeds at 7 DAF. ChIP-PCR analysis revealed that 11 fragments in the promoters of eight genes (OsAGPL3, Wx, OsSSIIa, OsSSIIIa, OsSSIVb, SBE1, OsBEIIb, and OsISA2) could be enriched by the anti-OsbZIP58 antibody individually (Fig. 8B). Furthermore, the Ha-2 fragment of the Wx promoter was in the Wx-a fragment (–1651 to –1399), and the C53 fragment of the SBE1 promoter in the SBE1-b fragment (–116 to –42), and both fragments were significantly enriched by the anti-OsbZIP58 antibody.

Additionally, yeast one-hybrid analysis was used to further test the binding ability of OsbZIP58 to the 15 loci used in ChIP-PCR assay. As shown in Fig. 8C and D, six of these fragments, OsAGPL3, Wx-a, OsSSIIa-b, SBE1-b, SBEIIb-a, and OsISA2, were strongly recognized by the OsbZIP58 protein. Four other fragments, Wx-b, Wx-c, SBE1-a, and SBEIIb-b, showed weaker binding with OsbZIP58. These data indicated that ten fragments in six promoters, including OsAGPL3, Wx, OsSSIIa, SBE1, SBEIIb, and OsISA2, could be recognized by OsbZIP58 in yeast. These results suggested that OsbZIP58 directly regulates six starch synthetic genes, controlling the accumulation of starch during seed development.

Thus, OsbZIP58 binds to the promoters of multiple rice starch biosynthetic genes in vivo, and this association is probably mediated by the ACGT elements.

Discussion

OsbZIP58 directly regulates starch synthesis

In this study, we identified a rice bZIP transcription factor, OsbZIP58, as a key regulator modulating different steps of starch synthesis in rice endosperm by promoting the expression of multiple rice starch biosynthetic genes (Fig. 8). Mutations of OsbZIP58 led to altered expression of rice starch biosynthetic genes (Fig. 7) and altered starch composition and structure (Figs 3 and 5).

The observation that a reduction in OsbZIP58/RISBZ1 expression caused opacity in seeds has been reported in KD-RISBZ1 seeds, where the expression of OsbZIP58 is lower than that of wild-type seeds (Kawakatsu et al., 2009). The seed phenotypes in KD-RISBZ1 were weaker compared with the osbzip58 mutants described in this study, possibly due to the remaining expression of OsbZIP58 in KD-RISBZ1 plants.

OsbZIP58 has pleiotropic effects on starch synthesis

Our genetic and biochemical analyses indicate that OsbZIP58 regulates the expression of starch biosynthesis genes (Fig. 7) and hence modulates starch metabolism and starch-related phenotypes in rice endosperm. The amylopectin composition of osbzip58 mutant seeds was similar to that of the sbe1 mutant and was opposite to those of the ssI and beIIb mutants (Nishi et al., 2001; Satoh et al., 2003; Fujita et al., 2006). SBE1 is downregulated in osbzip58, whereas SSI and OsBEIIb are dramatically upregulated. Thus, the aberrant features of amylopectin in the osbzip58 mutant were the manifestation of the effects of several genes, including SBE1, SSI, and OsBEIIb.

Surprisingly, several mutants of various pathways exhibit sbe1 mutant-like amylopectin properties, including flo2, pho1, and sugar-1. FLO2 harbours a tetratricopeptide repeat motif and is considered to mediate protein–protein interactions (She et al., 2010). PHOL/OsPHO1 is hypothesized to play a crucial role in the glucan initiation process, which occurs at an early stage of starch biosynthesis, by synthesizing glucan primers with long DP values (Satoh et al., 2008). The sugar-1 mutant is defective in ISA1 (Kubo et al., 2005), which is a starch debranching enzyme directly involved in the synthesis of amylopectin. The amylopectin properties of inactive japonica-type SSIIa grains largely resemble those of the sbe1 mutant (Nakamura et al., 2005). This raises the possibility that SBE1 is part of a protein complex of multiple enzymes that play important roles in the formation of A chains, B1 chains, and clusters connecting B chains of amylopectin (Jeon et al., 2010). The current study suggests that OsbZIP58 is probably one of the regulators of this enzyme complex.

The osbzip58 mutants exhibited loosely packed, spherical starch granules on the ventral region of endosperm and contained reduced amounts of starch. In the sbe1 mutant, the loss of SBE1 activity did not affect the accumulation of starch or the morphological properties of the seeds (Satoh et al., 2003). This indicates that a low level of SBE1 is not the sole cause of the osbzip58 starch phenotype in endosperm. The osbzip58 starch phenotype may be ascribed to the combined effects of altered expression of multiple rice starch synthesis genes.

The broad binding specificity of OsbZIP58

Here, we showed that OsbZIP58 could bind to the promoter regions of multiple rice starch synthesis genes in vivo, possibly via the ACGT motifs. An electrophoretic mobility shift assay was used to demonstrate that OsbZIP58/RISBZ1 is able to bind to the GCN4 motif located in seed storage protein gene promoters, and transient assays demonstrated that this protein can activate the transcription of several seed storage protein synthesis genes via the GCN4 motif (Onodera et al., 2001; Yamamoto et al., 2006). In addition, the electrophoretic mobility shift assay was used to demonstrate that OsbZIP58/RISBZ1 binds to the O2 target sequences [TCCACGT(a/c)R(a/t) and GATGYRTGG] located in the promoters of seed storage protein genes (Onodera et al., 2001). Taken together, these data suggest that OsbZIP58 possesses broad binding specificity for genes related to seed maturation.

Several other bZIP proteins exhibit broad binding ability. For example, RITA/OsbZIP20 displays broad binding specificity for palindromic ACGT elements (Izawa et al., 1994). The maize Opaque2 protein interacts with the promoter regions of b-32 and cyPPDK1 at their binding sites (GA/TGAPyPuTGPu), and also interacts with 22kDa zein by binding to the sequence TCCACGTAGA and activates transcription of these genes in vivo (Lohmer et al., 1991; Schmidt et al., 1992; Maddaloni et al., 1996). Another rice bZIP protein, OsbZIP33/REB, can recognize and bind to the GCN4 element in the Wx gene in addition to the ACGT element in the promoter of α-globulin (Nakase et al., 1997; Cheng et al., 2002). The above-mentioned bZIP transcription factors have a close phylogenetic relationship. OsbZIP58/RISBZ1 is the closest homologous protein of maize Opaque2 in rice, while OsbZIP58 and OsbZIP33/REB are classified into one minimum cluster, and OsbZIP20 is outside of this cluster in an unrooted phylogenetic tree (Nijhawan et al., 2008). These data suggest that these bZIP transcription factors play broad roles during seed maturation.

Fourteen genes encoding starch biosynthesizing enzymes have been shown to have similar expression patterns during seed development, with high expression levels at approximately 7 DAF; there may be a coordination mechanism that regulates these seed-specific genes (Ohdan et al., 2005). The current study revealed, for the first time, that OsbZIP58 is one of these regulators. This study elucidated the unknown regulatory mechanism underlying rice starch synthesis and will potentially assist rice breeding and engineering efforts.

Supplementary data

Supplementary data are available at JXB online.

Supplementary Fig. S1. Identification and characterization of the osbzip58 mutants and CLs.

Supplementary Fig. S2. Western blot detecting the specificity of the anti-OsbZIP58 antibody.

Supplementary Table S1. Information about primers used in this study.

Supplementary Table S2. Locations of promoter regions and sequences of primers used in the ChIP-PCR assays.

Supplementary Data

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Dr Jian Hua (Cornell University) and Dr Ning Jiang (Michigan State University) for their critical reading of the manuscript, Mr Yong Xu and Mr Qi-Dong Zu (Yangzhou University) and Mr Xiao-Yan Gao, Mr Zhi-Ping Zhang, and Miss Ji-Qin Li (Shang Institute of Plant Physiology and Ecology) for their technical support. This work was supported by grants from the Ministry of Science and Technology of China (2012CB944803, 2012AA10A302, and 2011CB100202), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31171517), and the Ministry of Agriculture (2011ZX08009-003) of China.

Glossary

Abbreviations:

AAC

apparent amylose content

bZIP

basic leucine zipper

ChIP

chromatin immunoprecipitation

CL

complemented line

DAF

days after flowering

DP

degrees of polymerization

HPAEC-PAD

high-performance anion-exchange chromatography with pulsed amperometric detection

ORF

open reading frame

qRT-PCR

quantitative reverse transcription

REB

rice endosperm bZIP

SD

standard deviation

SEM

scanning electron microscopy.

References

  1. Burrell MM. 2003. Starch: the need for improved quality or quantity--an overview. Journal of Experimental Botany 54, 451–456 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Cai Y, Xie DL, Wang ZY, Hong MM. 2002. Interaction of rice bZIP protein REB with the 5′-upstream region of both rice sbe1 gene and waxy gene. Chinese Science Bulletin 47, 310–314 [Google Scholar]
  3. Chen L, Wang ZY, Zhang JL, Cai XL, Hong MM. 1996a. Nuclear protein binding site in 5ʹ-upstream region of the rice waxy gene. Acta Phytophysiologica Sinica (in Chinese) 22, 349–356 [Google Scholar]
  4. Chen L, Xing YY, Zhang JL, Wang ZY, Hong MM. 1996b. Isolation of the genes encording DNA bingding protein Interacting with 5ʹ upsteam region of the rice waxy gene by using yeast one-hybrid system. Acta Phytophysiologica Sinica 25, 110–114 (in Chinese). [Google Scholar]
  5. Cheng SJ, Wang ZY, Hong MM. 2002. Rice bZIP protein, REB, interacts with GCN4 motif in promoter of Waxy gene. Science China Life Sciences 45, 352–360 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Counce PA, Keisling TC, Mitchell AJ. 2000. A uniform, objective, and adaptive system for expressing rice development. Crop Science 40, 436–443 [Google Scholar]
  7. Dian W, Jiang H, Wu P. 2005. Evolution and expression analysis of starch synthase III and IV in rice. Journal of Experimental Botany 56, 623–632 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Dong ZC, Zhao Z, Liu CW, Luo JH, Yang J, Huang WH, Hu XH, Wang TL, Luo D. 2005. Floral patterning in Lotus japonicus. Plant Physiology 137, 1272–1282 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Fitzgerald MA, McCouch SR, Hall RD. 2009. Not just a grain of rice: the quest for quality. Trends in Plant Science 14, 133–139 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Fu FF, Xue HW. 2010. Coexpression analysis identifies Rice Starch Regulator1, a rice AP2/EREBP family transcription factor, as a novel rice starch biosynthesis regulator. Plant Physiology 154, 927 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Fujita N, Yoshida M, Asakura N, Ohdan T, Miyao A, Hirochika H, Nakamura Y. 2006. Function and characterization of starch synthase I using mutants in rice. Plant Physiology 140, 1070–1084 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Hannah LC, James M. 2008. The complexities of starch biosynthesis in cereal endosperms. Current Opinion in Biotechnology 19, 160–165 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Haring M, Offermann S, Danker T, Horst I, Peterhansel C, Stam M. 2007. Chromatin immunoprecipitation: optimization, quantitative analysis and data normalization. Plant Methods 3, 11 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Hirose T, Terao T. 2004. A comprehensive expression analysis of the starch synthase gene family in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Planta 220, 9–16 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Isshiki M, Tsumoto A, Shimamoto K. 2006. The serine/arginine-rich protein family in rice plays important roles in constitutive and alternative splicing of pre-mRNA. Plant Cell 18, 146–158 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Izawa T, Foster R, Nakajima M, Shimamoto K, Chua NH. 1994. The rice bZIP transcriptional activator RITA-1 is highly expressed during seed development. Plant Cell 6, 1277–1287 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Jain M, Nijhawan A, Tyagi AK, Khurana JP. 2006. Validation of housekeeping genes as internal control for studying gene expression in rice by quantitative real-time PCR. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications 345, 646–651 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. James MG, Denyer K, Myers AM. 2003. Starch synthesis in the cereal endosperm. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 6, 215–222 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Jeon JS, Ryoo N, Hahn TR, Walia H, Nakamura Y. 2010. Starch biosynthesis in cereal endosperm. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry 48, 383–392 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Jeong DH, An S, Kang HG, Moon S, Han JJ, Park S, Lee HS, An K, An G. 2002. T-DNA insertional mutagenesis for activation tagging in rice. Plant Physiology 130, 1636–1644 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Juliano BO. 1998. Varietal impact on rice quality. Cereal Foods World 43, 207–211 [Google Scholar]
  22. Kawakatsu T, Takaiwa F. 2010. Differences in transcriptional regulatory mechanisms functioning for free lysine content and seed storage protein accumulation in rice grain. Plant and Cell Physiology 51, 1964–1974 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Kawakatsu T, Yamamoto MP, Hirose S, Yano M, Takaiwa F. 2008. Characterization of a new rice glutelin gene GluD-1 expressed in the starchy endosperm. Journal of Experimental Botany 59, 4233–4245 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Kawakatsu T, Yamamoto MP, Touno SM, Yasuda H, Takaiwa F. 2009. Compensation and interaction between RISBZ1 and RPBF during grain filling in rice. The Plant Journal 59, 908–920 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Kubo A, Rahman S, Utsumi Y, et al. 2005. Complementation of sugary-1 phenotype in rice endosperm with the wheat isoamylase1 gene supports a direct role for isoamylase1 in amylopectin biosynthesis. Plant Physiology 137, 43–56 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Liu QQ, Zhang JL, Wang ZY, Hong MM, Gu MH. 1998. A highly efficient transformation system mediated by Agrobacterium tumefaciens in rice. Acta Phytophsiol Sinica 24, 259–275 (in Chinese). [Google Scholar]
  27. Lohmer S, Maddaloni M, Motto M, Di Fonzo N, Hartings H, Salamini F, Thompson RD. 1991. The maize regulatory locus Opaque-2 encodes a DNA-binding protein which activates the transcription of the b-32 gene. EMBO Journal 10, 617–624 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Maddaloni M, Donini G, Balconi C, Rizzi E, Gallusci P, Forlani F, Lohmer S, Thompson R, Salamini F, Motto M. 1996. The transcriptional activator Opaque-2 controls the expression of a cytosolic form of pyruvate orthophosphate dikinase-1 in maize endosperms. Molecular & General Genetics 250, 647–654 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Miyao A, Iwasaki Y, Kitano H, Itoh J, Maekawa M, Murata K, Yatou O, Nagato Y, Hirochika H. 2007. A large-scale collection of phenotypic data describing an insertional mutant population to facilitate functional analysis of rice genes. Plant Molecular Biology 63, 625–365 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Nagamine T, Komae K. 1996. Improvement of a method for chain-length distribution analysis of wheat amylopectin. Journal of Chromatography A 732, 255–259 [Google Scholar]
  31. Nakamura Y, Francisco PB, Jr., Hosaka Y, Sato A, Sawada T, Kubo A, Fujita N. 2005. Essential amino acids of starch synthase IIa differentiate amylopectin structure and starch quality between japonica and indica rice varieties. Plant Molecular Biology 58, 213–227 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Nakase M, Aoki N, Matsuda T, Adachi T. 1997. Characterization of a novel rice bZIP protein which binds to the α-globulin promoter. Plant Molecular Biology 33, 513–522 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Nijhawan A, Jain M, Tyagi AK, Khurana JP. 2008. Genomic survey and gene expression analysis of the basic leucine zipper transcription factor family in rice. Plant Physiology 146, 333–350 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Nishi A, Nakamura Y, Tanaka N, Satoh H. 2001. Biochemical and genetic analysis of the effects of amylose-extender mutation in rice endosperm. Plant Physiology 127, 459–472 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Ohdan T, Francisco PB, Jr, Sawada T, Hirose T, Terao T, Satoh H, Nakamura Y. 2005. Expression profiling of genes involved in starch synthesis in sink and source organs of rice. Journal of Experimental Botany 56, 3229–3244 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Onodera Y, Suzuki A, Wu CY, Washida H, Takaiwa F. 2001. A rice functional transcriptional activator, RISBZ1, responsible for endosperm-specific expression of storage protein genes through GCN4 motif. Journal of Biological Chemistry 276, 14139–14152 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Sano Y, Maekawa M, Kikuchi H. 1985. Temperature effects on the Wx protein level and amylose content in the endosperm of rice. Journal of Heredity 76, 221–222 [Google Scholar]
  38. Satoh H, Nishi A, Yamashita K, Takemoto Y, Tanaka Y, Hosaka Y, Sakurai A, Fujita N, Nakamura Y. 2003. Starch-branching enzyme I-deficient mutation specifically affects the structure and properties of starch in rice endosperm. Plant Physiology 133, 1111–1121 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Satoh H, Shibahara K, Tokunaga T, et al. 2008. Mutation of the plastidial α-glucan phosphorylase gene in rice affects the synthesis and structure of starch in the endosperm. Plant Cell 20, 1833–1849 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Schmidt RJ, Ketudat M, Aukerman MJ, Hoschek G. 1992. Opaque-2 is a transcriptional activator that recognizes a specific target site in 22-kD zein genes. Plant Cell 4, 689–700 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. She KC, Kusano H, Koizumi K, et al. 2010. A novel factor FLOURY ENDOSPERM2 is involved in regulation of rice grain size and starch quality. Plant Cell 22, 3280–3294 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Smith AM. 1999. Making starch. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 2, 223–229 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Tan YF, Li JX, Yu SB, Xing YZ, Xu CG, Zhang Q. 1999. The three important traits for cooking and eating quality of rice grains are controlled by a single locus in an elite rice hybrid, Shanyou 63. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 99, 642–648 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Tian Z, Qian Q, Liu Q, et al. 2009. Allelic diversities in rice starch biosynthesis lead to a diverse array of rice eating and cooking qualities. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 106, 21760–21765 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Yamakawa H, Hirose T, Kuroda M, Yamaguchi T. 2007. Comprehensive expression profiling of rice grain filling-related genes under high temperature using DNA microarray. Plant Physiology 144, 258–277 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Yamamoto MP, Onodera Y, Touno SM, Takaiwa F. 2006. Synergism between RPBF Dof and RISBZ1 bZIP activators in the regulation of rice seed expression genes. Plant Physiology 141, 1694–1707 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Zeng D, Yan M, Wang Y, Liu X, Qian Q, Li J. 2007. Du1, encoding a novel Prp1 protein, regulates starch biosynthesis through affecting the splicing of Wxb pre-mRNAs in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Plant Molecular Biology 65, 501–509 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Zhu Y, Cai XL, Wang ZY, Hong MM. 2003. An interaction between a MYC protein and an EREBP protein is involved in transcriptional regulation of the rice Wx gene. Journal of Biological Chemistry 278, 47803–47811 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Data

Articles from Journal of Experimental Botany are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES