Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Aug 5.
Published in final edited form as: Circ Res. 2005 Jun 10;96(11):1129–1131. doi: 10.1161/01.RES.0000170705.56583.45

Unraveling the links between diabetes, obesity, and cardiovascular disease

Paul Huang 1
PMCID: PMC3733534  NIHMSID: NIHMS37708  PMID: 15947251

Patients with diabetes mellitus are known to be at increased risk for coronary artery disease and myocardial infarction, and have worse outcomes after coronary interventions such as stenting1. The mechanisms for this increased risk are not fully known, but are thought to reflect vascular abnormalities of inflammation, hypertension, dyslipidemia, and hypercoagulability2. In turn, these vascular abnormalities may be the result of hyperglycemia, insulin resistance, and advanced glycation products seen in diabetes3, 4. However, the precise molecular links between the metabolic abnormalities seen in diabetes, and the resulting vascular changes that increase propensity for atherosclerosis are not clearly understood.

One such link is endothelial dysfunction, seen in diabetes, obesity, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, smoking, and aging5, 6. Endothelial dysfunction is characterized by defects in the normal vascular relaxation response to mediators such as acetylcholine, or to increased blood flow. This can be clinically measured by ultrasound studies of forearm blood flow responses. The basis for endothelial dysfunction may involve a reduction in the amount of bioavailable nitric oxide (NO) in the vasculature. NO is necessary for vascular relaxation and endothelium dependent relaxing factor (EDRF) activity7, 8. NO also serves to suppress atherosclerosis by reducing endothelial cell activation, smooth muscle proliferation, leukocyte activation and leukocyte-endothelial interactions, and platelet aggregation and adhesion9-12. Therefore, reduction in the amount of bioavailable NO would result in a pro-atherogenic state.

In this issue, Molnar et al describe a mouse model of type 2 diabetes in which they fed C57BL/6 wild-type mice a diet high in fat and sucrose for 9 weeks13. These mice developed changes consistent with diabetes, including obesity, hyperglycemia, and hyperinsulinemia. The authors found that these mice show marked attenuation of endothelium-dependent vasodilation to acetylcholine. They also demonstrated minor alterations in response to the endothelium-independent vasodilator sodium nitroprusside and in the vasoconstrictor response to phenylephrine. These results confirm that the primary metabolic changes caused by the high fat and sucrose diet are sufficient to cause abnormalities in vascular function. But what are the mechanisms for these abnormalities?

Several pathways may lead to endothelial dysfunction, as outlined in Figure 1. First, eNOS mRNA or protein expression levels may be diminished14. Second, tissue levels of L-arginine, the substrate for NO production, may be limited. An endogenous competitive inhibitor, asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA) can reduce endothelial NO production even in the presence of adequate L-arginine levels15, 16. Third, co-factors of eNOS may be limiting: eNOS requires FAD, FMN, NADPH, and BH4 as co-factors. BH4, whose synthesis is rate-limited by GTP cyclohydrolase, is a particularly important co-factor, because in its absence, eNOS can generate superoxide anion17. Fourth, homodimerization of eNOS may be interrupted. Dimerization of eNOS and its proper intracellular localization to caveloae are mediated in part by interactions with caveolin and hsp902, 18. Fifth, eNOS is phosphorylated at serine 1179 (S1179) by Akt kinase and other kinases; blockade of Akt decreases eNOS activity19, 20. Sixth, NO produced by eNOS may be rapidly inactivated by reaction with superoxide (O2-) to form peroxynitrite (OONO-)21. This superoxide can be formed by NAD(P)H oxidase22, or uncoupled eNOS17. Peroxynitrite is itself a strong oxidant that can damage tissues. Peroxynitrite also nitrosylates tyrosine residues in proteins, a finding by Beckman and colleagues that allows the use of immunohistochemical staining for nitrotyrosine to be used as a surrogate marker for the presence of peroxynitrite21. These mechanisms are not mutually exclusive, and each of them has been demonstrated in vivo.

Figure 1. Mechanisms of endothelial dysfunction.

Figure 1

Phosphorylation of eNOS at S1179 by Akt kinase appears to be an important step in the regulation of its activity. S1179 phosphorylation activates eNOS, increasing its enzymatic activity and reducing dependence on intracellular calcium19, 23. The protective effects of estrogens24, 25 and statins26 act in part through increasing eNOS S1179 phosphorylation. Recent work indicates that PPARγ27, leptin28, 29 and adiponectin30 also modulate eNOS S1179 phosphorylation.

Molnar et al examined two potential mechanisms for endothelial dysfunction in the mice fed the high fat and sucrose diet: eNOS phosphorylation, and eNOS dimerization13. Western blot analysis showed that Akt phosphorylation and eNOS S1179 phosphorylation were relatively unaffected by the high fat and sucrose diet, although there were some minor variations between vascular beds. Thus--in this model, at least--abnormalities in eNOS phosphorylation do not appear to account for endothelial dysfunction. Rather, the authors found that eNOS dimerization was nearly absent in the mice fed the high fat and sucrose diet. In addition, an increase in arterial nitrotyrosine staining suggested that an increase in peroxynitrite levels in these animals, providing a possible mechanism for inhibition of dimerization.

Endothelial dysfunction is an early step in atherogenesis, and may occur before structural changes in the vasculature. Later steps include vascular injury, accumulation of lipid into foam cells, oxidation of LDL, and the recruitment of inflammatory cells, resulting in development of plaques31. Molnar et al subjected the diabetic mice to femoral artery denudation, to assess neointimal proliferation in response to vascular injury. This model allows the response to vascular injury to be quantitated32 and studied separately from atherosclerotic lesion formation. Mice fed the high fat and sucrose diet did not show an increase in lesion formation, but actually showed a reduction in lesion burden compared with mice fed a normal diet. This unexpected result underscores that the links between diabetes and atherogenesis are complex, and are not limited to endothelial dysfunction. It shows that endothelial dysfunction can be separated from vascular injury response, in that the former is worse in the high fat diet fed mice, while the latter is less severe. Although endothelial dysfunction is likely involved in the pathogenesis of arteriosclerosis, this model of diabetes may require additional factors—such as hyperlipidemia or hypercoagulability—to manifest abnormalities in later steps in atherogenesis.

This study is an important step in unraveling the complex links between metabolism and vascular abnormalities. The metabolic syndrome is a clinical constellation of glucose intolerance and insulin resistance, obesity, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, inflammation, and hypercoagulability33. It is likely that the metabolic changes seen diabetes, obesity, and metabolic syndrome together induce changes in the vasculature that result not only in endothelial dysfunction, but also increased propensity to vascular injury and atherogenesis34. It remains to be seen how this model compares with other mouse models of diabetes and obesity, for example ob/ob mice (which lack leptin), db/db mice (which lack the leptin receptor), or mouse models of type I diabetes that use islet cell toxins such as streptozotocin or alloxan. Future studies will likely involve combining mouse models of diabetes, such as this one, with other mouse models that provide the additional factors of hyperlipidemia or hypercoagulability, such as Western diet-fed apoE knockout mice or LDL receptor knockout mice.

Acknowledgments

PLH is supported by PHS grants HL057818, NS33335, NS048426, and NS010828.

Footnotes

Conflict of Interest Disclosure: The author has no conflicts to disclose.

References

  • 1.Schofer J, Schluter M, Rau T, et al. Influence of treatment modality on angiographic outcome after coronary stenting in diabetic patients: a controlled study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000 May;35(6):1554–1559. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(00)00574-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Gimbrone MA., Jr Endothelial dysfunction and atherosclerosis. J Card Surg. 1989;4(2):180–183. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8191.1989.tb00275.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Creager MA, Luscher TF, Cosentino F, et al. Diabetes and vascular disease: pathophysiology, clinical consequences, and medical therapy: Part I. Circulation. 2003 Sep 23;108(12):1527–1532. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000091257.27563.32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Luscher TF, Creager MA, Beckman JA, et al. Diabetes and vascular disease: pathophysiology, clinical consequences, and medical therapy: Part II. Circulation. 2003 Sep 30;108(13):1655–1661. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000089189.70578.E2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Cai H, Harrison DG. Endothelial dysfunction in cardiovascular diseases: the role of oxidant stress. Circ Res. 2000;87(10):840–844. doi: 10.1161/01.res.87.10.840. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Gimbrone MA, Jr, Topper JN, Nagel T, et al. Endothelial dysfunction, hemodynamic forces, and atherogenesis. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2000;902:230–239. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2000.tb06318.x. discussion 239-240. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Bredt DS, Snyder SH. Nitric oxide: a physiologic messenger molecule. Ann Rev Biochem. 1994;63:175–195. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.63.070194.001135. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Furchgott RF, Zawadzki JV. The obligatory role of endothelial cells in the relaxation of arterial smooth muscle by acetylcholine. Nature. 1980;288(5789):373–376. doi: 10.1038/288373a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Bath PM. The effect of nitric oxide-donating vasodilators on monocyte chemotaxis and intracellular cGMP concentrations in vitro. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1993;45(1):53–58. doi: 10.1007/BF00315350. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Lefer AM, Ma XL. Decreased basal nitric oxide release in hypercholesterolemia increases neutrophil adherence to rabbit coronary artery endothelium. Arterioscler Thromb. 1993;13(6):771–776. doi: 10.1161/01.atv.13.6.771. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Mooradian DL, Hutsell TC, Keefer LK. Nitric oxide (NO) donor molecules: effect of NO release rate on vascular smooth muscle cell proliferation in vitro. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1995;25(4):674–678. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Radomski MW, Palmer RM, Moncada S. Modulation of platelet aggregation by an L-argininenitric oxide pathway. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 1991;12:87–88. doi: 10.1016/0165-6147(91)90510-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Molnar J, Shuiqing Y, Mzhavia N, et al. Diabetes induces endothelial dysfunction but does not increase neointimal formation in high fat diet fed C57BL/6J mice. Circulation Research. 2005 doi: 10.1161/01.RES.0000168634.74330.ed. UNKNOWN. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Wang Y, Marsden PA. Nitric oxide synthases: gene structure and regulation. Adv Pharmacol. 1995;34:71–90. doi: 10.1016/s1054-3589(08)61081-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Bode-Boger SM, Boger RH, Kienke S, et al. Elevated L-arginine/dimethylarginine ratio contributes to enhanced systemic NO production by dietary L-arginine in hypercholesterolemic rabbits. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1996 Feb 15;219(2):598–603. doi: 10.1006/bbrc.1996.0279. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Cooke JP. Does ADMA cause endothelial dysfunction? Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2000 Sep;20(9):2032–2037. doi: 10.1161/01.atv.20.9.2032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Cosentino F, Patton S, d'Uscio LV, et al. Tetrahydrobiopterin alters superoxide and nitric oxide release in prehypertensive rats. J Clin Invest. 1998 Apr 1;101(7):1530–1537. doi: 10.1172/JCI650. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Shaul PW. Regulation of endothelial nitric oxide synthase: Location, location, location. Annu Rev Physiol. 2002;64:749–774. doi: 10.1146/annurev.physiol.64.081501.155952. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Dimmeler S, Fleming I, Fisslthaler B, et al. Activation of nitric oxide synthase in endothelial cells by Akt-dependent phosphorylation. Nature. 1999;399(6736):601–605. doi: 10.1038/21224. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Fulton D, Gratton JP, Sessa WC. Post-translational control of endothelial nitric oxide synthase: why isn't calcium/calmodulin enough? J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2001 Dec;299(3):818–824. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Beckman JS, Koppenol WH. Nitric oxide, superoxide, and peroxynitrite: the good, the bad, and ugly. Am J Physiol. 1996;271(5 Pt 1):C1424–1437. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.1996.271.5.C1424. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Griendling KK, Sorescu D, Lassegue B, et al. Modulation of protein kinase activity and gene expression by reactive oxygen species and their role in vascular physiology and pathophysiology. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2000;20(10):2175–2183. doi: 10.1161/01.atv.20.10.2175. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Fulton D, Gratton JP, McCabe TJ, et al. Regulation of endothelium-derived nitric oxide production by the protein kinase Akt. Nature. 1999;399(6736):597–601. doi: 10.1038/21218. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Hisamoto K, Ohmichi M, Kurachi H, et al. Estrogen induces the Akt-dependent activation of endothelial nitric-oxide synthase in vascular endothelial cells. J Biol Chem. 2001 Feb 2;276(5):3459–3467. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M005036200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Haynes MP, Sinha D, Russell KS, et al. Membrane estrogen receptor engagement activates endothelial nitric oxide synthase via the PI3-kinase-Akt pathway in human endothelial cells. Circ Res. 2000 Oct 13;87(8):677–682. doi: 10.1161/01.res.87.8.677. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Kureishi Y, Luo Z, Shiojima I, et al. The HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor simvastatin activates the protein kinase Akt and promotes angiogenesis in normocholesterolemic animals. Nat Med. 2000 Sep;6(9):1004–1010. doi: 10.1038/79510. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Cho DH, Choi YJ, Jo SA, et al. Nitric oxide production and regulation of endothelial nitric-oxide synthase phosphorylation by prolonged treatment with troglitazone: evidence for involvement of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) gamma-dependent and PPARgamma-independent signaling pathways. J Biol Chem. 2004 Jan 23;279(4):2499–2506. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M309451200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Goetze S, Bungenstock A, Czupalla C, et al. Leptin induces endothelial cell migration through Akt, which is inhibited by PPARgamma-ligands. Hypertension. 2002 Nov;40(5):748–754. doi: 10.1161/01.hyp.0000035522.63647.d3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Vecchione C, Maffei A, Colella S, et al. Leptin effect on endothelial nitric oxide is mediated through Akt-endothelial nitric oxide synthase phosphorylation pathway. Diabetes. 2002 Jan;51(1):168–173. doi: 10.2337/diabetes.51.1.168. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Chen H, Montagnani M, Funahashi T, et al. Adiponectin stimulates production of nitric oxide in vascular endothelial cells. J Biol Chem. 2003 Nov 7;278(45):45021–45026. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M307878200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Ross R. Atherosclerosis--an inflammatory disease. N Engl J Med. 1999 Jan 14;340(2):115–126. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199901143400207. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Lindner V, Fingerle J, Reidy MA. Mouse model of arterial injury. Circ Res. 1993 Nov;73(5):792–796. doi: 10.1161/01.res.73.5.792. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Garber AJ. The metabolic syndrome. Med Clin North Am. 2004 Jul;88(4):837–846. ix. doi: 10.1016/j.mcna.2004.04.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Ritchie SA, Ewart MA, Perry CG, et al. The role of insulin and the adipocytokines in regulation of vascular endothelial function. Clin Sci (Lond) 2004 Dec;107(6):519–532. doi: 10.1042/CS20040190. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES