Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Jul 28.
Published in final edited form as: Chem Commun (Camb). 2013 Jul 28;49(59):6674–6676. doi: 10.1039/c3cc43209b

The Core-Inversible Micelles for Hydrophilic Drug Delivery

Wenzhe Huang a, Changying Shi a, Yu Shao a, Kit S Lam b, Juntao Luo a,*
PMCID: PMC3733992  NIHMSID: NIHMS496483  PMID: 23775217

Abstract

A unique core-inversible micelle (CIM) was formed via PEG5kCA8 for hydrophilic drug delivery. An amyloid-fibril-inhibiting water-soluble molecule, congo red (CR), has been loaded into the hydrophilic core of CIMs. The targeting folate-CIMs significantly enhanced the intracellular delivery of hydrophilic CR in a folate receptor-expressing cell line.


Many diseases arise from the dysfunction of intracellular molecules. Therefore, intracellular delivery of therapeutics is critical in restoring the cellular functions, thus treating these diseases. Protein, peptide and gene therapeutics have been applied in the treatment of many diseases, including cancer. However, the therapeutic indexes of these hydrophilic reagents, including water-soluble small molecules, are limited by their poor permeability through the plasma membrane. In addition, hydrophilic molecules are unlikely drug candidates, since they may exhibit unfavourable pharmacokinetic profiles in terms of the absorption, distribution, metabolism and excretion (ADME). Conjugation of cell-targeting proteins1 or cell penetrating peptides (CPP)2 have been applied for the intracellular delivery of hydrophilic cell-membrane-impermeable peptides and proteins. At the same time, synthetic cationic nanocarriers3 have been developed for delivery of peptides/proteins3a and gene molecules3b. But the off-target toxicity of the CPP and cationic synthetic nanocarriers, as well as the immunogenicity of immunotoxins3b hampered their systemic administration. Strategies for the systemic delivery of hydrophilic molecules,4 e.g. PEGylation,4a polymer nano/microsphere4b and liposomes4c have been developed. However, novel nanocarriers are desired for the intracellular delivery of water-soluble drug molecules.

Cholic acid (CA) is a primary bile acid secreted into GI track for the digestion of fatty nutrients. The facial amphiphilic structure of CA has attracted a broad interest in the field of supramolecular chemistry5 and polymer chemistry6. CA-containing molecular devices have been developed as molecular cages5 for the encapsulation of guest molecules or served as an artificial ion channels7 or vehicles8 for the trans-membrane transportation of hydrophilic molecules. However, these oligo-CA constructors usually have poor water solubility and small cavities, therefore limiting their application for drug delivery.

We have developed a novel biocompatible linear-dendritic amphiphilic co-polymer, i.e. PEG5kCA8 shown in Figure S-1, composed of polyethylene glycol (PEG 5000) and a dendritic octamer of cholic acid (CA8).9 It self-assembles into micelles in aqueous solution for efficient delivery of hydrophobic drugs, such as paclitaxel (PTX),9b doxorubicin (DOX)9d and vincristine9c etc. Interestingly, PEG5kCA8 were found to self-assemble selectively in certain apolar solvents into core-inversible micelles (CIMs) with a PEG shell and a hydrophilic core, driven by the hydrogen bonding (Figure S-2).

The particle sizes of PEG5kCA8 aggregates in different solvents were measured by dynamic light scattering (DLS). The particle sizes (Mean ± SD, based on area distribution) are listed in descending order of the solvent polarity: water (18.6 ± 3.4 nm) > acetonitrile (21.8 ± 3.9 nm) > acetone (15.1 ± 2.7 nm) ~ ethanol (1.1 ± 0.2 nm) > THF (1.6 ± 0.1 nm) > DCM (binary peaks, 2.2 nm and 10.0 nm) ~ ethyl acetate (15.9 ± 2.8 nm) > toluene (24.5 ± 4.6 nm) > CCl4 (36.9 ± 7.0 nm) (Figure S-3). PEG chain in telodendrimer is soluble in all the solvents selected above. However, oligo-CA in telodendrimer selectively aggregates in different solvents, due to the relative solvophobicity of two distinct surfaces of CA.10 It is evident that PEG5kCA8 self-assembles into nanoparticles in the solvents with either high polarity (water, acetonitrile and acetone) or relative low polarity (ethyl acetate, toluene and CCl4) driven by the hydrophobic or hydrophilic interactions (e.g. H-bonding), respectively. In the solvents with medium polarity with strong H-bonding capability, such as THF and ethanol, the hydrophobic interactions between CA motifs are diminished and H-bonds are saturated by solvent molecules,11 which prevent the aggregation of telodendrimers.

PEG proton NMR signals in PEG5kCA8 at 3.5-3.6 ppm were detected in all solvents used in this study (Figure S-4), indicating that the PEG layer was fully solvated. In contrast, proton signals of the CA structure were completely undetectable in D2O, indicating the collapse of CA into the core of the micelles.9a, 12 The suppression of the NMR signals on CA was also observed in nonpolar toluene and CCl4. TEM images (Figure 1) also revealed the spherical CIMs in these apolar solvents. On the contrary, no CIM nanoparticle was observed in DMSO (Figure S-5) under TEM and a well-defined proton NMR spectrum of PEG5kCA8 was recorded in DMSO (Figure S-4), both indicating the complete solvation of PEG5kCA8 in DMSO. In chloroform and acetonitrile, significant broadening of CA proton signals was observed, indicating that certain entanglements of oligo-CA occurred. The TEM image revealed the spherical nanoparticles of CIMs in acetonitrile, however with unclear edges, indicating loose aggregations (Figure S-5).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Negatively stained TEM images of PEG5kCA8 in ethyl acetate and toluene. The right corners of the images were shown by the black-white color inversion with the same magnification.

Given the CIM formation in apolar solvents, we would like to probe the polarity of the core in CIM. 8-hydroxylpyrene-1,3,6-trisulfonic acid trisodium salt (HPTS) is a water-soluble fluorescent molecule with the distinct shift in UV-Vis absorbance and emissions upon deprotonation respectively (Figure S-6).10 As shown in Figure 2A, the deprotonated HPTS (pH 10) was loaded in PEG5kCA8 CIMs via a freeze-dry method (illustrated in Figure S-2) in five different solvents, namely, toluene, ethyl acetate, ethanol, acetonitrile and water. Their particle sizes were measured from 14.7 nm to 26.1 nm in these solvents except in ethanol, where the only oligomer of PEG5kCA8 was observed at 5 nm. The blue fluorescence of HPTS in ethanol indicated a low polar environment in ethanol, prohibiting HPTS deprotonation. In water and acetonitrile, the protonated HPTS directly dissolved in the bulky solvents, showing green fluorescence. The green and blue-green fluorescence of HPTS in apolar toluene and ethyl acetate in the presence of CIMs indicated that HPTS was surrounded by a relatively high polar microenviroment, which promoted HPTS deprotonation. In addition, the absorbance of the deprotonated HPTS at 450 nm increased with a red-shift after being loaded into the CIMs in apolar solvents, such as toluene and ethyl acetate (Figure 2B). Coincident with the above fluorescence study, a small peak at 475 nm was observed in ethanol and was exhibited as a major peak in acetonitrile. Surprisingly, the HPTS-O peak at 450 nm was relatively small in aqueous micellar solution, which may be due to the encapsulation of HPTS into the hydrophobic core of the nanocarrier, prohibiting HPTS deprotonation.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

(A) The deprotonated HPTS (50 μM) was encapsulated in CIMs in different solvents exhibiting different particle sizes and fluorescent colors at excitation of 365 nm. (B) The UV-Vis absorbance of the protonated HPTS at 450 nm was enhanced after being loaded in CIMs in apolar solvents.

The reverse micelles (RMs), formed by small molecular surfactants or some amphiphilic block copolymers,13 have the complete core-shell inversed structures in apolar solvents compared with their normal micelles in water. Differently, CIMs share the same PEG shell with their normal micelles in water as illustrated in Figure S-2. This makes it possible to transport the drug-loaded CIMs from organic solvent into aqueous solution via a simple aqueous extraction, owing to the dominant partition of PEG in water. Based on this unique phenomenon, we are exploring the applications of CIMs in encapsulating hydrophilic bioactive molecules for intracellular drug delivery. Congo red (CR), an ionic water-soluble dye (Figure 3A), has been used to stain amyloid fibrils formation. Furthermore, it has been reported to inhibit the amyloid oligomerization to treat neurodegenerative diseases.14 However, the incapability of CR to cross blood-brain barrier (BBB) limited the efficacy of CR in Huntington’s disease mouse models, 14c, 15 which may be addressed via the nanoparticle-based drug delivery.15

Figure 3.

Figure 3

(A) The structure of ionic hydrophilic CR; (B) The picture showed the complete aqueous transfer of CR-CIMs from organic ethyl acetate via simple extraction; (C) The enhanced Fluorescence spectrum of CR after being loaded in CIMs in EtOAc and after being extracted into the aqueous solution (with the same volume); (D) The gravity SEC indicated that CR was loaded in CIMs after being transferred into aqueous solution, evidenced by a early eluted fraction; (E) Significant prolonged release profile of CR from CR-loaded in CIMs compared with free CR in aqueous solution.

The encapsulation of CR into CIMs significantly increases its solubility in ethyl acetate, whereas CR is completely insoluble. The particle size of the CR loaded CIMs in ethyl acetate was measured via DLS to be 14.4 ± 3.4 nm (Figure S-7). As discussed above, the CIMs loaded with CR could be easily transferred into aqueous phase from ethyl acetate via simple extraction with mild shaking for minutes or standing for hours (Figure 3B). The completion of CIMs extraction was furtherconfirmed via a FITC-labeled fluorescent micelle (Figure S-8). After being loaded into CIMs, a red shift of CR absorbance from 500 nm to 515 nm was observed, which indicates the interactions of CR with CIMs (Figure S-9). At the same time, the fluorescence intensity of CR was dramatically enhanced after being loaded into CIMs in ethyl acetate as well as after aqueous extraction (Figure 3C). Almost identical fluorescent spectra of CR-CIMs before and after extraction indicated that CR was loaded in an intact microenvironment during aqueous transfer. The restrictions of the intermolecular rotations (RIR) significantly increase the quantum yield and turn on the emission of CR molecules.16 Compared with free CR, the aqueous extraction of the CR-loaded CIMs was eluted much faster in a gravity size exclusive chromatograph (SEC), showing that CR molecules were encapsulated in nanoparticles (Figure 3D). The content of CR in CIMs was detected via UV-Vis absorbance to be 1% (w/w, CR to CIMs) with 100% of encapsulation efficiency. Furthermore, the CR loading procedure was optimized using 95% ethanol aqueous solution to dissolve CR and PEG5kCA8 directly, followed by rotoevaporation and dispersion in EtOAc. This significantly increased the solubility and the loading capacity of CR in CIMs (12.7%, CR/CIMs, w/w) with over 83% encapsulation efficiency after aqueous extraction.

Furthermore, the CR release from CR-CIMs in aqueous solution was studied using dialysis methods and compared with the free CR aqueous solution. As shown in Figure 3E, the free CR diffused completely through the dialysis membrane (3,500 MWCO) within 8 hours; however, the CR released from CR-CIMs in aqueous solution much slower with 50% release on day 8 and 80% release on day 40, respectively. The sustained encapsulation of CR in CIMs may be due to the unique amphiphilic structure of cholic acid inside the core of CIM, which provides both hydrogen bonding and hydrophobic interactions with CR molecules.

Furthermore, CR was loaded into the CIMs decorated with folic acid (FA) on the surface as a targeting ligand to enhance the cell uptake of the nanoparticles. A folic acid receptor overexpressing colon cancer cell line, HT-29, was incubated with free CR, CR-CIMs and targeting CR-FA-CIMs, respectively, for 3 hours before being imaged under a fluorescence microscope. As shown in Figure 4 free CR only showed very weak staining on a small population of cells. Slight improvement of cell staining was observed for the CR encapsulated in the non-targeting CIMs. In contrast, the targeting nanocarriers FA-CIMs significantly increased the cell uptake of the fluorescent CR in HT-29 cells, which proved the concept of the intracellular delivery of the hydrophilic molecules via CIMs. It will be interesting to further test the in vivo efficacy of the targeting CR-CIMs in the degenerative mouse models.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Folate receptor-positive HT-29 cells were incubated with free CR, CR-CIMs and CR-FA-CIMs. The fluorescence images indicated that targeting nanocarrier, FA-CIMs, significantly increased the cell uptake of CR in HT-29 cells.

In conclusion, we have demonstrated the formation of CIMs possessing hydrophilic core structures in some apolar organic solvents. Hydrophilic fluorescence probe molecules and hydrophilic bioactive molecules, e.g. HPTS and CR, have been loaded into these CIMs in apolar solvents with high efficiency. The folic acid-decorated targeting CIMs significantly enhanced the intracellular delivery of hydrophilic bioactive CR molecules. The efficient transfer of CIMs into aqueous solution with the hydrophilic payloads encapsulated is key and strongly suggests the application of CIMs for the in vivo delivery of hydrophilic therapeutics. Furthermore, we have developed a photo-crosslinkable CIM in organic solvents, which will be able to cage a broad range of hydrophilic payloads more efficiently after the aqueous extraction.

Supplementary Material

ESI

Acknowledgements

We greatly thank Prof. Stephan Wilkens for assistance in TEM analysis. Authors acknowledge the financial support from NIH/NCI R01CA140449, R01CA115483 and Carol M. Baldwin Breast Cancer Research Foundation.

Footnotes

Electronic Supplementary Information (ESI) available: [Materials and methods, DLS particle sizes and UV-vis spectra].

References

  • 1.Snyder EL, Dowdy SF. Expert Opin. Drug Deliv. 2005;2:43–51. doi: 10.1517/17425247.2.1.43. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Lindsay MA. Curr. Opin. Pharmacol. 2002;2:587–594. doi: 10.1016/s1471-4892(02)00199-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.(a) Gu Z, Biswas A, Zhao M, Tang Y. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2011;40:3638–3655. doi: 10.1039/c0cs00227e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Kreitman RJ. AAPS J. 2006;8:E532–551. doi: 10.1208/aapsj080363. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.(a) Harris JM, Chess RB. Nat. Rev. Drug. Discov. 2003;2:214–221. doi: 10.1038/nrd1033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Mundargi RC, Babu VR, Rangaswamy V, Patel P, Aminabhavi TM. J Control. Release. 2008;125:193–209. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2007.09.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Samad A, Sultana Y, Aqil M. Curr. Drug Deliv. 2007;4:297–305. doi: 10.2174/156720107782151269. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Zhao Y. Curr. Opin. in Colloid Interface Sci. 2007;12:92–97. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Zhu X-X, Nichifor M. Acc. Chem. Res. 2002;35:539–546. doi: 10.1021/ar0101180. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Kobuke Y, Nagatani T. J. Org. Chem. 2001;66:5094–5101. doi: 10.1021/jo010208i. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Janout V, Regen SL. Bioconjugate Chem. 2009;20:183–192. doi: 10.1021/bc800296g. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.(a) Luo J, Xiao K, Li Y, Lee JS, Shi L, Tan YH, Xing L, Holland Cheng R, Liu GY, Lam KS. Bioconjugate Chem. 2010;21:1216–1224. doi: 10.1021/bc1000033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Xiao K, Luo J, Fowler WL, Li Y, Lee JS, Xing L, Cheng RH, Wang L, Lam KS. Biomaterials. 2009;30:6006–6016. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.07.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Kato J, Li Y, Xiao K, Lee JS, Luo J, Tuscano JM, O’Donnell RT, Lam KS. Mol. Pharm. 2012;9:1727–1735. doi: 10.1021/mp300128b. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) Xiao K, Luo J, Li Y, Lee JS, Fung G, Lam KS. J. Control. Release. 2011;155:272–281. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2011.07.018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Luo J, Chen Y, Zhu XX. Langmuir. 2009;25:10913–10917. doi: 10.1021/la9013703. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Jin Y, Xin R, Ai P, Chen D. Int. J. Pharm. 2008;350:330–337. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2007.08.037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Kim C, Lee SC, Kang SW, Kwon IC, Kim Y-H, Jeong SY. Langmuir. 2000;16:4792–4797. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.(a) Jones M-C, Tewari P, Blei C, Hales K, Pochan DJ, Leroux J-C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006;128:14599–14605. doi: 10.1021/ja065462c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Uskokovic V, Drofenik M. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 2007;133:23–34. doi: 10.1016/j.cis.2007.02.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Jones M-C, Leroux J-C. Soft Matter. 2010;6:5850–5859. [Google Scholar]; (d) Jones M-C, Gao H, Leroux J-C. J. Control. Release. 2008;132:208–215. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2008.05.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.(a) Heiser V, Scherzinger E, Boeddrich A, Nordhoff E, Lurz R, Schugardt N, Lehrach H, Wanker EE. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2000;97:6739–6744. doi: 10.1073/pnas.110138997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Ashkenazi Y, Hersko C, Gafni J, Sohar E, Heller H. Isr. J. Med. Sci. 1967;3:572–574. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Sanchez I, Mahlke C, Yuan J. Nature. 2003;421:373–379. doi: 10.1038/nature01301. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) Lendel C, Bertoncini CW, Cremades N, Waudby CA, Vendruscolo M, Dobson CM, Schenk D, Christodoulou J, Toth G. Biochemistry. 2009;48:8322–8334. doi: 10.1021/bi901285x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Wood NI, Pallier PN, Wanderer J, Morton AJ. Neurobiol Dis. 2007;25:342–353. doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2006.09.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.(a) Hong Y, Lam JW, Tang BZ. Chem Soc Rev. 2011;40:5361–5388. doi: 10.1039/c1cs15113d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Al Kayal T, Russo E, Pieri L, Caminati G, Berti D, Bucciantini M, Stefani M, Baglioni P. Soft Matter. 2012;8:9115–9126. [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

ESI

RESOURCES