Abstract
The adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase (AMPK) is activated by antigen receptor signals and energy stress in T cells. In many cell types, AMPK can maintain energy homeostasis and can enforce quiescence to limit energy demands. We consequently evaluated the importance of AMPK for controlling the transition of metabolically active effector CD8 T lymphocytes to the metabolically quiescent catabolic memory T cells during the contraction phase of the immune response. We show that AMPKα1 activates rapidly in response to the metabolic stress caused by glucose deprivation of CD8 cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs). Moreover, AMPKα1 restrains mammalian target of rapamycin complex 1 activity under conditions of glucose stress. AMPKα1 activity is dispensable for proliferation and differentiation of CTLs. However, AMPKα1 is required for in vivo survival of CTLs following withdrawal of immune stimulation. AMPKα1null T cells also show a striking defect in their ability to generate memory CD8 T-cell responses during Listeria monocytogenes infection. These results show that AMPKα1 monitors energy stress in CTLs and controls CD8 T-cell memory.
Keywords: Cytotoxic T lymphocyte, Energy stress, Listeria monocytogenes, Memory, Metabolism
Introduction
T lymphocytes respond to antigen by proliferating and differentiating to effector cells that mediate adaptive immune responses. Naïve and memory T lymphocytes are metabolically quiescent and have low rates of amino acid uptake and protein synthesis. They also have low rates of glucose uptake and use oxidative phosphorylation to efficiently metabolize glucose to generate ATP 1. However, effector T cells metabolically reprogram and upregulate glucose, amino acid, and iron uptake to support the synthesis of the new macromolecules necessary for T-cell clonal expansion and effector function. Immune-activated T cells also switch from metabolizing glucose primarily through oxidative phosphorylation to using the glycolytic pathway 2–4. These changes in metabolism appear to be rate limiting for the differentiation of both naïve CD4 and CD8 T cells into effector and memory subtypes 5–8. Accordingly, it is important to understand the mechanisms that allow T cells to increase their metabolism to meet the energy demands of effector cells. It is equally important to identify signals that allow effector T cells to return to a metabolically quiescent state as they make the transition from effector cells to memory T cells during the contraction phase of the immune response. In this context, recent studies have shown that the mammalian target of rapamycin complex 1 (mTORC1) controls the production of memory T cells 9. Inhibition of mTORC1 with rapamycin thus increases the memory T-cell formation following virus challenge. There is an increasing awareness that the control of T-cell metabolism has the potential to dictate T-cell fate.
One evolutionarily conserved molecule that controls cell metabolism is the serine/threonine kinase adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase (AMPK). AMPK is phosphorylated and activated by liver kinase B1 when cells are energy stressed 10. Triggering of TCR also activates AMPK via Ca2+–calmodulin-dependent protein kinase kinases 11. The proposed role for active AMPK is to restore energy balance in a cell by inhibiting ATP-consuming processes and stimulating ATP-generating pathways 10. In energy stressed cells, AMPK thus enforces quiescence to limit energy demands. T cells exclusively express the AMPKα1 catalytic isoform. In this context, germ-line deletion of AMPKα1 on a C57BL/6 background results in embryonic lethality (http://www.emmanet.org/mutant_types.php?keyword=0417). However, mixed genetic background AMPKα1 null mice are viable and appear fully immune-competent in vivo 12, 13. These data indicate that AMPK is dispensable for T-cell effector function. However, a recent study has shown that metformin, a pharmacological activator of AMPK promotes the production of memory T cells 14. The caveat is that metformin indirectly activates AMPK because it inhibits respiratory chain complex I and thereby causes an increase in cellular adenosine monophosphate/ATP ratio. Metformin has many effects on cell metabolism that are not mediated by AMPK 15, 16. Moreover, even if activation of AMPK can promote the formation of memory T cells, this does not inform whether AMPK is essential for this key process. Metformin actions in vivo can thus be independent of AMPK or indeed could be T-cell extrinsic 15, 16. Hence for a detailed analysis of the role of AMPKα1 in T cells, there is a requirement to examine the consequences of a T-cell-specific deletion of this kinase. Accordingly, the present study uses a CD4Cre transgene model to delete AMPKαl floxed alleles in thymocytes. We show that AMPKα1 activity is not required for CD8 T-cell proliferation or differentiation. However, AMPKα1 is shown to act as a critical sensor of energy status to control mTORC1 activity in CTLs and is required for CD8 T-cell memory.
Results
AMPKα1 is dispensable for proliferation, generation and function of CTLs
Mice with floxed AMPKα1 alleles were backcrossed to transgenic mice expressing Cre recombinase under the control of the CD4 promoter (CD4Cre) to delete the AMPKα1 gene in CD4/CD8 double positive thymocytes and hence in all subsequent T-cell populations (Fig. 1A). AMPKα1fl/fl (control) and CD4creAMPKα1fl/fl (AMPKα1null) mice had a normal distribution of peripheral α/β T cells in the thymus, lymph nodes, and spleen (data not shown). TCR primed CD8 T cells cultured in IL-2 clonally expand and differentiate to cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs) 17. AMPKα1null CD8 T cells activated normally in vitro (Fig. 1B), and showed normal growth and proliferative responses (Fig. 1C) and differentiated to effector cells as judged by their ability to produce high levels of IFN-γ (Fig. 1D). Further experiments examined the impact of AMPKα1 deletion on the ability of OT1 TCR transgenic CD8 T cells to activate and proliferate in vivo. Adoptively transferred OT1 cells were TCR triggered with SIINFEKL peptide presented by the MHC class I molecule H-2Kb by APCs. AMPKα1null OT1 cells responded normally to TCR triggering in vivo and blasted and proliferated (Fig. 1E). We also determined the ability of AMPKα1null OT1 cells to differentiate into effector CD8 T cells during an immune response against the attenuated bacterial strain Listeria monocytogenes engineered to express the OVA-derived peptide SIINFEKL, i.e. recombinant L. monocytogenes OVA (rLMOVA) 18. Equal numbers of control and AMPKα1null OT1 T cells were adoptively transferred into recipient mice that were challenged with rLMOVA. The frequency of OT1 cells in the pathogen-challenged animals was analyzed at day 7, the peak of the effector phase. At this time point, the relative frequency of AMPKα1null OT1 T cells in the spleen was modestly increased compared with control cells (Fig. 2A). Both control and AMPKα1null OT1 cells had downregulated expression of IL-7Rα and CD62L and upregulated expression of CD44 and KLRG1: a cell surface phenotype characteristic of effector CD8 T cells (Fig. 2B). Control and AMPKα1null cells were equally able to respond rapidly ex vivo to produce high levels of IFN-γ upon cognate antigen rechallenge (Fig. 2C). Collectively, these data reveal that AMPKα1 is dispensable for CD8 T-cell differentiation into effector cells during an immune response.
AMPKα1 acts as a sensor of glucose metabolism in CTLs
Effector CD8 T cells are highly glycolytic and maintain high levels of glucose uptake 19. CTLs treated with 2-deoxyglucose, an inhibitor of glycolysis, activated AMPK as judged by high levels of AMPKT172 phosphorylation and also increased levels of acetyl–CoA carboxylase phosphorylated on its AMPK substrate sequence Ser79 (pACCS79) (Fig. 3A). There was no detectable ACC phosphorylation in AMPKα1null CTLs treated with 2-deoxyglucose (Fig. 3A). CTLs thus exclusively expressed the AMPKα1 catalytic subunit and do not compensate for AMPKα1 deletion by expressing AMPKα2. Glucose deprivation also activated AMPKα1; even a brief 1 h switch of T cells into low glucose (1 mM) resulted in pAMPKT172 stabilization (Fig. 3B). Moreover, the titratable effect of different levels of exogenous glucose on AMPKα1 activity in CTLs demonstrated the ability of AMPKα1 to act as a quantitative sensor of glucose uptake in CTLs (Fig. 3B). Recent studies have revealed the importance of energy-generating glutaminolysis pathways in T cells 8. However, glutamine deprivation did not cause AMPKα1 activation in T cells, indicating that AMPKα1 selectively monitors glucose metabolism (Fig. 3C).
One proposed function of AMPKα1 is to switch cells to a quiescent catabolic state. In this context, one conserved mechanism used by AMPKα1 to restore energy balance in cells is inhibition of mTORC1 20, 21. Previous studies have shown that glucose deprivation inhibits mTORC1 in T cells 22 but whether this is mediated by AMPKα1 has not been explored. The present experiments address this issue by monitoring the impact of glucose deprivation on mTORC1 activity in control and AMPKα1null CTLs. In these experiments, mTORC1 activity was monitored by assessing the phosphorylation of mTORC1 substrate sequences in p70 S6-Kinase 1 (S6K1T389, T421/S424) and 4EBP-1T37/46. Phosphorylation of S6K substrate sequences in the S6 ribosomal subunit (pS6S235/6, S240/4) was also monitored. Figure 3D shows that in control CTLs, the activity of mTORC1 was strictly dependent on cells sustaining high levels of glucose uptake as even a switch into 1 mM glucose inactivated mTORC1. Strikingly, glucose-deprived AMPKα1null CTLs maintained high levels of mTORC1 activity (Fig. 3D). AMPKα1 is thus a dynamic sensor for glucose uptake and functions to terminate mTORC1 activity under conditions of energy stress in CTLs.
These data raise the possibility that AMPKα1 might have a role in supporting the switch of effector T cells to a quiescent catabolic state. Accordingly, to explore the capacity of AMPKα1 to modulate metabolic adaptation, fully differentiated control and AMPKα1null CTLs generated in vitro were mixed at a 1:1 ratio and adoptively cotransferred into naïve recipient mice (Fig. 4A). In these experiments, the majority of CTLs will die, because there is no antigen stimulation and no pro-inflammatory cytokines to sustain the expression of glucose and amino acid transporters that mediate the essential nutrient uptake required for CTLs metabolism. However, any cell that can make the switch to a metabolically quiescent state will be able to survive. The data show that 1 week after the adoptive transfer, a small subpopulation of the transferred CTLs could be recovered from secondary lymphoid organs. However, few transferred AMPKα1null cells were recovered from secondary lymphoid organs compared with control cells (Fig. 4B). These results argue that AMPKα1null effector T cells were impaired in their ability to make the transition back to quiescence compared with control cells.
It was important to consider whether there was a general inability of AMPKα1null T cells to compete in vivo for secondary lymphoid tissue niches. We examined the ability of AMPKα1null primary T cells to undergo lymphopenia-induced proliferation in competition with control T cells. In these experiments, control and AMPKα1null T cells were adoptively transferred at a 1:1 ratio into Rag2-/- mice. After 14 days, the recovery of control and AMPKα1null cells from the recipient spleens showed that AMPKα1null T cells were equally efficient at undergoing proliferative expansion in a lymphopenic environment. There was no intrinsic problem with the ability of naïve AMPKα1null CD8 T cells to compete with control T cells for the homeostatic antigen and cytokine signals (Fig. 4C). The inability to recover AMPKα1null effector cells after adoptive transfer reflects that effector CD8 T cells need AMPKα1 to revert to a quiescent state.
CD8 T-cell memory immune responses depend on AMPKα1
In a response to infection with rLMOVA, AMPKα1null CD8 OT1 T cells undergo normal clonal expansion and contraction (Fig. 2 and 5A). Different CD8 effector subsets can be defined based on their relative expression of IL-7R-α and KLRG1 23, 24. It has been shown that IL-7RαhighKLRG1low memory precursor effector cells have a greater potential to become long-lived memory cells and contribute to secondary responses than IL-7RαlowKLRG1high short-lived effector cells. However, the memory precursor effector cells/short-lived effector cells distribution of OT1 T cells following rLMOVA infection was independent of AMPKα1 at various time-points after primary infection (Fig. 5B). AMPKα1 thus seems dispensable for CD8 T-cell immune responses during primary infection with rLMOVA. To address whether AMPKα1 contributes to secondary CD8 responses, control and AMPKα1null OT1 cells were cotransferred and recipient mice rechallenged with rLMOVA 3 weeks following primary infection and assessed for a recall response after a further 6 days. These recall experiments revealed a striking decrease in the relative frequency of AMPKα1null OT1 cells compared with control OT1 cells both at the sites of Listeria infection: spleen and liver and in the bone marrow (Fig. 5C). Taken together, AMPKα1null OT1 cells were strikingly defective in their ability to generate a secondary immune response to rLMOVA (Fig. 5C). To further confirm whether AMPKα1 may play a role in primary infection, we analyzed the frequency and absolute numbers of polyclonal ova-specific CD8 T cells defined by MHC class I+SIINFEKL pentamer flow cytometry staining. Also in a polyclonal setting, in CD4creAMPKα1fl/fl mice, AMPKα1 appears dispensable for primary CD8 T-cell responses (Fig. 5D). Figure 5E shows that CD4CreAMPKα1fl/fl mice undergoing a secondary challenge to rLMOVA had reduced frequencies of ova-reactive CD8 T cells in the spleen, liver, and bone marrow compared with control mice.
AMPKα1null CD8 T cells are thus impaired in their ability to make effector T cells in a secondary immune response.
Discussion
The control of T-cell metabolism seems to be important in the effector/memory transition of T cells. The cytokine IL-2 that drives effector CTLs differentiation at the expense of memory cell formation is a strong activator of mTORC1 signaling whereas IL-15, which supports memory T-cell formation, only weakly initiates mTORC1 activity 25. CTLs have high rates of glucose and amino acid uptake to meet the energy demands associated with rapid proliferation and abundant effector cytokine production. In contrast, memory T cells are relatively metabolically quiescent cells. Effector CD8 T cells would thus need to revert from a metabolically active state to a quiescent catabolic state to produce memory T cells 26. The strength of mTORC1 activation appears to be a pivotal control switch that determines effector versus memory CD8 T-cell differentiation 9, 27. Previous studies have shown that glucose deprivation inhibits mTORC1 activity in T cells 22 but the glucose sensor that mediates this response was unknown. The present article demonstrates that AMPKα1 acts as a critical glucose sensor in effector CTLs and is activated by glucose deprivation and functions to restrain mTORC1 activity under conditions of metabolic stress.
TCR triggering activates AMPKα1 11, but AMPKα1 seems dispensable for the initial antigen receptor-induced metabolic switch that accompanies effector T-cell differentiation. AMPKα1 is not required for T-cell proliferation or the induction of CD8 effector T cells in a primary immune response to L. monocytogenes infection. However, AMPKα1null CD8 T cells are impaired in their ability to make effector T cells in a secondary immune response. The developmental processes that regulate effector T cells progression to form memory cells must include mechanisms that allow CD8 T cells to revert from the metabolically active state characteristic of effectors to the quiescent catabolic state of memory cells. The present data are consistent with a model whereby AMPKα1 regulates the metabolic adaptations that allow secondary effector cell generation. AMPKα1 thus monitors energy stress in CD8 T cells and is a key regulator of CD8 T-cell memory to secondary effector transition during an immune response to infection.
Materials and methods
Mouse models
AMPKα1fl/fl mice were obtained from Benoit Viollet and Marc Foretz and bred to CD4cre transgenic and OT1 TCR transgenic 28 mice. Mice were maintained in the Biological Resource unit at the University of Dundee in compliance with UK Home Office Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act 1996 guidelines.
Cell culture
CTLs were generated as described previously 29. Briefly, polyclonal CTLs were generated in vitro using 0.5 μg/mL αCD3 (2C11) and OT1 CTLs 1 ng/mL SIINFEKL stimulation for 2 days, then expanded in 20 ng/mL IL-2 for 3–5 days. Cells were grown in complete RPMI (GIBCO), 10% heat-inactivated FCS, penicillin and streptomycin, 50 μM β-mercaptoethanol and split to approximately 0.3 × 106 cells/mL daily. The in vitro generated CTLs were used day 5–7 after activation. For glucose/glutamine deprivation, CTLs were incubated 1 h in glucose-free RPMI with dialyzed FCS (GIBCO) or 2 h in L-glutamine-free RPMI (GIBCO). Treatment with 50 mM 2-deoxyglucose (Sigma) for 20 min was used as a positive control.
Western blot
CTLs were gently centrifuged and then lyzed at a density of 1–2 × 107/mL in Tris lysis buffer containing 10 mM Tris pH 7.05, 50 mM NaCl, 30 mM Na pyrophosphate, 50 mM NaF, 5 μM ZnCl2, 10% glycerol, 0.5% Triton, 1 μM DTT, protease inhibitors (Roche), and Calyculin A phosphatase inhibitor (Calbiochem). Proteins were resolved on SDS 4–12% polyacrylamide gel, transferred to nitrocellulose membranes, blocked in 5% milk, and incubated with primary antibody and developed using HRP-coupled secondary antibodies and ECL. Antibodies to detect pAMPKT172, pS6KT389, S6KT421/S424, pS6S235/6, p4EBP1T37/46 and total S6K were from Cell Signalling Technologies. pACCS79 was detected by anti-sheep AlexaFluor 680 and Streptavidin-IRDye800 using LICOR system (Odyssey). Antibodies recognizing pACCS79 and AMPKα1 were kindly provided by Professor Grahame Hardie.
Flow cytometry
Cells (1–2 × 106/sample) were incubated in Fc-block (2.4G2) at 4°C in PBS with 10% complete RPMI. Fluorescent-labeled antibodies to detect: CD8-α (53−6.7), CD25 (7D4), CD44 (IM7), CD45.1 (A20), CD45.2 (104), CD62L (MEL-14), CD69 (H1.2F3), CD71 (C2), CD98 (RL388), IL-7Rα (SB/199), KLRG1 (2F1), Vα2 (B20.1), and Vβ5.1/2 (MR9–4) were obtained from BD Bioscience or eBioscience. To detect SIINFEKL-specific cells, MHC class I H-2Kb coupled to SIINFEKL pentamers labeled with allophycocyanin were used according to manufacturer's instructions (Proimmune).
For cytokine staining after L. monocytogenes infection, splenocytes were restimulated with SIINFEKL 1 μM for 5 h, Brefeldin A was added for 4 h. Intracellular cytokine staining to detect IFN-γ (XMG1.2) was performed using eBioscience reagents according to manufacturer's instructions. Flow cytometry used BD Calibur or BD LSR Fortessa and the data were processed using FlowJo softwaree (Treestar).
ELISA
Day 7 after initial activation OT1 CTLs were restimulated with 1 μM SIINFEKL for 3 h and the supernatant was harvested. IFN-γ ELISA was done according to manufacturer's instructions (eBioscience).
Adoptive transfer
For in vivo proliferation, CD45 congenically differently marked OT1 cells from AMPKα1fl/fl (control) and CD4creAMPKα1fl/fl (AMPKα1null) mice were purified using CD8 T-cell isolation kit (Miltenyi) according to manufacturer's instructions. The OT1 cells were mixed at an equal ratio and were labeled with 5 μM CFSE for 10 min at 37°C. Approximately 4 × 106 OT1 cells were co-injected iv into recipient C57BL/6 Ly5.1 mice. The mice were immunized with 40 μg SIINFEKL and 25 μg LPS ip the next day. The CFSE dilution was analyzed day 2 and 4 after immunization. For adoptive cotransfer of CTLs, day 7 fully differentiated CD4creAMPKα1fl/+ (control) and CD4creAMPKα1fl/fl (AMPKα1null) CTLs with different CD45 congenic markers were mixed at equal ratio, CFSE labeled and injected intravenously into C57BL/6 Ly5.1 or Rag2-/- recipient mice. The CTLs recovery was analyzed 1 week later by flow cytometry. To assess lymphopenia-induced proliferation, T cells were purified using pan-T-cell kit (Miltenyi) and 2–3 × 106 polyclonal CD8 T cells were mixed at an equal ratio and adoptively transferred intravenously into Rag2-/- recipient mice. The recovered cells were analyzed by flow cytometry 14 days later. To exclude the possibility of CD4cre-dependent rejection, CD4creAMPKα1fl/+ mice were used as controls in Figure 4.
Listeria monocytogenes infection
In total 104 OT1 cells mixed at a 1:1 ratio from CD45 congenically differently marked AMPKα1fl/fl (control) and CD4creAMPKα1fl/fl (AMPKα1null) mice were coinjected ip into C57BL/6 Ly5.1 recipient mice. Alternatively, AMPKα1fl/fl and CD4creAMPKα1fl/fl mice were infected to determine polyclonal responses. The mice were infected with attenuated ActA-deleted OVA-expressing L. monocytogenes (kindly provided by Professor Hao Shen)18. For primary infection 1–5 × 106 and for secondary challenge 10 × 106 colony forming units were injected iv.
Statistical analysis
Statistical analysis was done using Graph Pad Prism, t-test was performed on paired values, and Mann–Whitney nonparametric test was used for all other data. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001.
Acknowledgments
We thank biological service unit staff, Elizabeth Emslie, members of the Cantrell group, and Grahame Hardie. We are grateful to Hao Shen, Verity Pearce, and Klaus Okkenhaug for the Listeria monocytogenes model. This work was funded by Wellcome Trust Principal Research Fellowship grant 065975/Z/01/A and 097418/Z/11Z to DAC.
Glossary
- AMPK
AMP-activated protein kinase
- CTL
cytotoxic T lymphocyte
- mTORC1
mammalian target of rapamycin complex 1
- rLMOVA
recombinant Listeria monocytogenes OVA
Conflict of interest
The authors have declared no commercial or financial conflict of interest.
References
- 1.Krauss S, Brand MD, Buttgereit F. Signaling takes a breath–new quantitative perspectives on bioenergetics and signal transduction. Immunity. 2001;15:497–502. doi: 10.1016/s1074-7613(01)00205-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Wang T, Marquardt C, Foker J. Aerobic glycolysis during lymphocyte proliferation. Nature. 1976;261:702–705. doi: 10.1038/261702a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Frauwirth KA, Riley JL, Harris MH, Parry RV, Rathmell JC, Plas DR, Elstrom RL, et al. The, CD28 signaling pathway regulates glucose metabolism. Immunity. 2002;16:769–777. doi: 10.1016/s1074-7613(02)00323-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Rathmell JC, Vander Heiden MG, Harris MH, Frauwirth KA, Thompson CB. In the absence of extrinsic signals, nutrient utilization by lymphocytes is insufficient to maintain either cell size or viability. Mol. Cell. 2000;6:683–692. doi: 10.1016/s1097-2765(00)00066-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Michalek RD, Gerriets VA, Jacobs SR, Macintyre AN, MacIver NJ, Mason EF, Sullivan SA, et al. Cutting edge: distinct glycolytic and lipid oxidative metabolic programs are essential for effector and regulatory CD4+ T-cell subsets. J. Immunol. 2011;186:3299–3303. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1003613. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Jacobs SR, Herman CE, MacIver NJ, Wofford JA, Wieman HL, Hammen JJ, Rathmell JC. Glucose uptake is limiting in T-cell activation and requires CD28-mediated Akt-dependent and independent pathways. J. Immunol. 2008;180:4476–4486. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.180.7.4476. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.van der Windt GJW, Everts B, Chang C-H, Curtis JD, Freitas TC, Amiel E, Pearce EJ, et al. Mitochondrial respiratory capacity is a critical regulator of CD8+ T-cell memory development. Immunity. 2012;36:68–78. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2011.12.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Wang R, Dillon CP, Shi LZ, Milasta S, Carter R, Finkelstein D, McCormick LL, et al. The transcription factor Myc controls metabolic reprogramming upon T lymphocyte activation. Immunity. 2011;35:871–882. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2011.09.021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Araki K, Turner AP, Shaffer VO, Gangappa S, Keller SA, Bachmann MF, Larsen CP, et al. mTOR regulates memory CD8 T-cell differentiation. Nature. 2009;460:108–112. doi: 10.1038/nature08155. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Hardie DG, Ross FA, Hawley SA. AMPK: a nutrient and energy sensor that maintains energy homeostasis. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell, Biol. 2012;13:251–262. doi: 10.1038/nrm3311. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Tamás P, Hawley SA, Clarke RG, Mustard KJ, Green K, Hardie DG, Cantrell DA. Regulation of the energy sensor AMP-activated protein kinase by antigen receptor and Ca2+ in T lymphocytes. J. Exp. Med. 2006;203:1665–1670. doi: 10.1084/jem.20052469. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Mayer A, Denanglaire S, Viollet B, Leo O, Andris F. AMP-activated protein kinase regulates lymphocyte responses to metabolic stress but is largely dispensable for immune cell development and function. Eur. J. Immunol. 2008;38:948–956. doi: 10.1002/eji.200738045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.MacIver NJ, Blagih J, Saucillo DC, Tonelli L, Griss T, Rathmell JC, Jones RG. The liver kinase B1 is a central regulator of T-cell development, activation, and metabolism. J. Immunol. 2011;187:4187–4198. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1100367. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Pearce EL, Walsh MC, Cejas PJ, Harms GM, Shen H, Wang L-S, Jones RG, et al. Enhancing, CD8 T-cell memory by modulating fatty acid metabolism. Nature. 2009;460:103–107. doi: 10.1038/nature08097. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Foretz M, Hébrard S, Leclerc J, Zarrinpashneh E, Soty M, Mithieux G, Sakamoto K, et al. Metformin inhibits hepatic gluconeogenesis in mice independently of the LKB1/AMPK pathway via a decrease in hepatic energy state. J. Clin. Invest. 2010;120:2355–2369. doi: 10.1172/JCI40671. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Kalender A, Selvaraj A, Kim SY, Gulati P, Brûlé S, Viollet B, Kemp BE, et al. Metformin, independent of AMPK, inhibits mTORC1 in a rag GTPase-dependent manner. Cell Metab. 2010;11:390–401. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2010.03.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Cantrell DA, Smith KA. Transient expression of interleukin 2 receptors. Consequences for T-cell growth. J. Exp. Med. 1983;158:1895–1911. doi: 10.1084/jem.158.6.1895. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Pearce EL, Shen H. Generation of CD8 T-cell memory is regulated by IL-12. J. Immunol. 2007;179:2074–2081. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.179.4.2074. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Macintyre AN, Finlay D, Preston G, Sinclair LV, Waugh CM, Tamás P, Feijoo C, et al. Protein kinase B controls transcriptional programs that direct cytotoxic T-cell fate but is dispensable for T-cell metabolism. Immunity. 2011;34:224–236. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2011.01.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Gwinn DM, Shackelford DB, Egan DF, Mihaylova MM, Mery A, Vasquez DS, Turk BE, et al. AMPK phosphorylation of raptor mediates a metabolic checkpoint. Mol. Cell. 2008;30:214–226. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2008.03.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Inoki K, Zhu T, Guan K-L. TSC2 mediates cellular energy response to control cell growth and survival. Cell. 2003;115:577–590. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(03)00929-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Cham CM, Gajewski TF. Glucose availability regulates IFN-gamma production and p70S6 kinase activation in CD8+ effector T cells. J. Immunol. 2005;174:4670–4677. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.174.8.4670. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Sarkar S, Kalia V, Haining WN, Konieczny BT, Subramaniam S, Ahmed R. Functional and genomic profiling of effector CD8 T-cell subsets with distinct memory fates. J. Exp. Med. 2008;205:625–640. doi: 10.1084/jem.20071641. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Obar JJ, Jellison ER, Sheridan BS, Blair DA, Pham Q-M, Zickovich JM, Lefrançois L. Pathogen-induced inflammatory environment controls effector and memory CD8+ T-cell differentiation. J. Immunol. 2011;187:4967–4978. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1102335. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Cornish GH, Sinclair LV, Cantrell DA. Differential regulation of T-cell growth by IL-2 and IL-15. Blood. 2006;108:600–608. doi: 10.1182/blood-2005-12-4827. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.D'Cruz LM, Rubinstein MP, Goldrath AW. Surviving the crash: transitioning from effector to memory CD8+ T cell. Semin. Immunol. 2009;21:92–98. doi: 10.1016/j.smim.2009.02.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Rao RR, Li Q, Odunsi K, Shrikant PA. The mTOR kinase determines effector versus memory CD8+ T-cell fate by regulating the expression of transcription factors T-bet and Eomesodermin. Immunity. 2010;32:67–78. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2009.10.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Hogquist KA, Jameson SC, Heath WR, Howard JL, Bevan MJ, Carbone FR. T-cell receptor antagonist peptides induce positive selection. Cell. 1994;76:17–27. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90169-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Waugh C, Sinclair L, Finlay D, Bayascas JR, Cantrell D. Phosphoinositide (3,4,5)-triphosphate binding to phosphoinositide-dependent kinase 1 regulates a protein kinase BAkt signaling threshold that dictates T-cell migration, not proliferation. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2009;29:5952–5962. doi: 10.1128/MCB.00585-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]