Abstract
The later stages of cochlear differentiation and the developmental onset of hearing require thyroid hormone. Although thyroid hormone receptors (TRs) are a prerequisite for this process, it is likely that other factors modify TR activity during cochlear development. The mouse cochlea expresses type 2 deiodinase (D2), an enzyme that converts thyroxine, the main form of thyroid hormone in the circulation, into 3,5,3′-triiodothyronine (T3) the major ligand for TRs. Here, we show that D2-deficient mice have circulating thyroid hormone levels that would normally be adequate to allow hearing to develop but they exhibit an auditory phenotype similar to that caused by systemic hypothyroidism or TR deletions. D2-deficient mice have defective auditory function, retarded differentiation of the cochlear inner sulcus and sensory epithelium, and deformity of the tectorial membrane. The similarity of this phenotype to that caused by TR deletions suggests that D2 controls the T3 signal that activates TRs in the cochlea. Thus, D2 is essential for hearing, and the results suggest that this hormone-activating enzyme confers on the cochlea the ability to stimulate its own T3 response at a critical developmental period.
Keywords: deafness, thyroid hormone receptor
Thyroid hormone regulates many developmental processes that vary in their tissue specificity and the stage at which they occur. An important question therefore concerns the means by which this systemic hormonal signal is able to elicit its specific actions in a given tissue at the appropriate time. Hearing is one of the most sensitive functions controlled by thyroid hormone, and early-onset hypothyroidism or iodine deficiency are known causes of deafness in humans and rodent model species (1–5). Thyroid hormone is required for the timely coordination of a complex set of differentiation events in the maturing cochlea. In rodents, the cochlea is largely formed by birth, and it then proceeds through a period of differentiation during which auditory function initiates around postnatal day 13 (P13) and matures by ≈P20 (6, 7). Hypothyroidism during this period retards the differentiation of the cochlea, including the epithelium that contains the sensory hair cells (1, 3, 8, 9). The mechanisms that prompt the progression of these developmental events are poorly understood.
Thyroid hormone receptors TRβ and TRα1 are ligand-regulated transcription factors and are expressed in the sensory epithelium and other tissues in the rodent cochlea from midgestation into the postnatal period (10, 11). TRβ-deficient mice display auditory deficits with a subset of hypothyroid-like abnormalities in the cochlea (12, 13). TRα1 is individually dispensable for hearing, whereas deletion of both TRβ and TRα1 produces exacerbated defects that resemble those caused by hypothyroidism (13–15). Some human TRβ mutations are associated with hearing loss (16–18). Although TRs are necessary mediators of thyroid hormone signaling, it is unclear which other factors influence TR activity during cochlear development.
Thyroid hormone may be metabolically activated or inactivated by iodothyronine deiodinases (19–21). Thyroxine (T4), the main product released by the thyroid gland into the circulation is converted by outer ring 5′-deiodination into 3,5,3′-triiodothyronine (T3) the principal ligand of the TR. This conversion is mediated by deiodinase type 2 (D2) and deiodinase type 1 (D1) encoded by Dio2 and Dio1, respectively. Deiodinase type 3 (D3) depletes tissues of active hormone by inner ring deiodination of T4 and T3. The differential expression of D1, D2, and D3 in some tissues (22–26) raises the possibility that deiodinases play specific developmental roles. Previously, we identified prominent expression of D2 in the early postnatal mouse cochlea, suggesting a role for D2 in the development of hearing (27). D2 is expressed in the cochlear capsule and connective tissues that surround the internal sensory tissues. Here, we report an essential role for D2 in the development of the auditory system.
Methods
Mouse Strains. The targeted deletion of Dio2 was carried on a mixed background of 129/SvJ × C57BL/6 strains, as described (28). The mutation was backcrossed for two further generations onto the C57BL/6J strain (The Jackson Laboratory, no. 000664) that has minimal hearing loss before 6 months of age (13, 29). Genotyping was performed on genomic DNA by PCR with primers specific for neo in the Dio2- mutant allele and for a region of intron 1 and exon 2 specific for the WT gene (GenBank accession no. NT_039552). Primer sequences were: neo sense and antisense, GTGTTCCGGCTGTCAGCGC and GTCCTGATAGCGGTCCGCCA, respectively; and Dio2 sense and antisense, GACCATCCTTTATATTGCCTGACATG and GGCGGAAGGCTGGCAGTTGCC, respectively. Dio2-/- and control littermates were derived from crosses of Dio2+/- parents or Dio2-/- male and Dio2+/- females. Nursing dams or pregnant dams at 14.5–17.5 days postcoitum were treated with 0.3 or 1.0 μg/ml l-triiodothyronine (Sigma) in drinking water. Animal studies were conducted under approved protocols at Mount Sinai School of Medicine and Dartmouth Medical School. Statistical analyses were performed by using the Student t test.
Auditory-Evoked Brainstem Response (ABR). The ABR was measured by using a SmartEP system (Intelligent Hearing Systems, Miami) as described (13, 29). Mice were anesthetized with avertin (0.25 mg/g of body weight) for the short duration of the test and on revival were returned to their cages. Stimuli were presented at a rate of 25/s and averaged across 512 sweeps. Responses were bandpass filtered <100 and >3,000 Hz and amplified 100,000-fold. A threshold was defined as the minimal stimulus level that gave a recognizable waveform on a normalized scale. For presentation in figures, a fixed scale is used.
Histology, Immunohistochemistry, and Electron Microscopy. Cochleae were fixed in 3% glutaraldehyde/2% paraformaldehyde, decalcified, embedded in methacrylate, sectioned at 3–5 μm, and stained with thionin, as described (13). Groups of four to six cochleae from three mice were analyzed. Cryosections made from paraformaldehyde-fixed tissues were immunostained with antibodies against α- and β-tectorins by using detection with FITC-conjugated secondary antibodies (30). Tectorial membrane (TM) ultrastructure was examined in ultrathin sections by transmission electron microscopy, as described (13), in WT and Dio2-/- mice (n = 3) at 1 month of age. Prior analysis of ABR thresholds confirmed the auditory phenotype of these mice: WT, 42 ± 2 dB sound pressure level (SPL); Dio2-/- mice, 73 ± 3 dB SPL for a click stimulus.
Deiodination Assays and Hormone RIAs. For each genotype, three pools of cochleae each from ≈20 pups at P8 were collected on dry ice before assaying D2 and D3 activity, as described (28). Cochleae were homogenized in assay buffer containing 0.25 mM sucrose, 20 mM Tris·HCl, pH 7.6, with 5 mM DTT. For D2 assays, the mixture (total volume 50 μl) contained 80–100 μg of tissue protein and 1.2 mM EDTA. Substrate was 1.0 nM of [125I]reverse T3 or [125I]T4, and cofactor was 20 mM DTT. Reactions were incubated for 1 h at 37°C in the presence or absence of 1 mM 6-n-propyl-2-thiouracil, a D1 inhibitor, and the [125I]I- generated was detected after separation by ion exchange chromatography on Bio-Rad AG 50WXG (H+) resin. For D3 assays, the mixture did not contain EDTA, substrate was 1.0 nM [125I]T3, and cofactor was 50 mM DTT; products were separated for analysis by paper chromatography. [125I]reverse T3, [125I]T4, and [125I]T3 (specific activities ≈1,000 μCi/μg) were obtained from Perkin–Elmer and purified by chromatography using Sephadex LH-20 (Sigma) before use. Total T4 and total T3 levels were determined by RIA using Coat-A-Count reagents (Diagnostic Systems Laboratories, Webster, TX) (28) or a chemiluminescent assay for T4 on an Advia Centaur instrument (Bayer Health-Care, Tarrytown, NY) and a fluorometric assay for T3 on an Abbott AxSYM instrument. Coefficients of variation were 6–10% for T4 and 5–13% for T3.
Northern Blot Analysis. Total RNA samples from pools of cochleae from P8 pups (≈30 per genotype) were analyzed with a glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase probe and a 1.4-kb mouse D2 cDNA probe (B1), extending from the fifth codon to 561 bp downstream of the stop codon in the 3′ untranslated sequence, as described (27).
Results
Auditory Deficits in Dio2-/- Mice. Dio2-/- mice are a suitable model for the analysis of auditory function as they lack gross developmental defects (28, 31). The deletion in the major coding exon of Dio2 (28) allowed mice to be genotyped by PCR, as shown in Fig. 1A. Northern blot analysis detected a 7.0-kb D2 mRNA in cochlear samples from WT and Dio2+/- pups but not from Dio2-/- pups (Fig. 1B). Normally, cochlear D2 activity rises during the first postnatal week and is abundant at P8 (27). Cochlear homogenates from Dio2-/- pups at P8 lacked 5′-deiodinase activity, assayed with T4 or reverse T3 substrates (Fig. 1C). Activity was reduced by ≈50% in Dio2+/- mice. The 5′-deiodinase activity displayed by WT and Dio2+/- samples was attributable to D2 because it was not significantly different in the presence or absence of propylthiouracil, an inhibitor of D1. Inner ring deiodination by D3 was detected at similar low levels in cochlear samples from WT, Dio2+/-, and Dio2-/- pups at P8. Thus, no compensatory changes in D1 or D3 were evident in the cochlea in Dio2-/- mice.
To rule out systemic hypothyroidism in development as a cause of any deafness, thyroid hormone levels were determined in serum of WT and Dio2-/- mice between P8 and P25 (Fig. 1D). Dio2-/- pups displayed moderately elevated T3 and T4 levels, whereas Dio2-/- adults, as reported previously, had slight T4 increases caused by a mild dysfunction of the pituitary–thyroid axis (28). The degree of elevation of T4 and T3 was greater in younger Dio2-/- pups but moderated by P16. Thus, no general deficiency of thyroid hormones occurred in Dio2-/- mice. Hypothyroidism presents a known risk to hearing but a modest thyroid hormone increase would not cause overt deafness (12, 32) (and see Fig. 5).
To assess hearing, the ABR was measured in WT, Dio2+/-, and Dio2-/- littermates. Responses were markedly impaired in all Dio2-/- mice and could be evoked only with a significantly increased SPL (Fig. 2A). In 1-month-old Dio2-/- mice, the mean threshold for a click stimulus was 79 ± 2 dB SPL, an increase of 40 dB above normal (WT, 39 ± 2 dB SPL; P <0.001), indicating a severe, although not total, impairment of auditory function. ABR waveforms in mice typically display four to five peaks with the first two to three peaks representing responses from the cochlea and proximal brainstem centers (29, 33). In Dio2-/- mice, all peaks were poorly defined and had prolonged latency (Fig. 2B). Using a click stimulus at 90 dB SPL, mean latencies to peak IV in WT, Dio2+/-, and Dio2-/- mice were 4.06 ± 0.21, 4.44 ± 0.05, and 5.75 ± 0.19 ms, respectively (n = 6–8; P <0.001 for Dio2-/- vs. WT or Dio2+/-). The ABR also showed elevated thresholds and poorly defined waveforms in Dio2-/- mice for 8-, 16-, and 32-kHz stimuli that span the sensitive hearing range of mice. Similar threshold increases were recorded in 3-month-old Dio2-/- mice, indicating a permanent defect (for a click stimulus; thresholds were 81 ± 1 and 42 ± 3 dB SPL, for Dio2-/- and WT mice, respectively; P <0.01; n = 8 Dio2-/-, n = 4 WT). The auditory defects in Dio2-/- mice were similar to or slightly worse than those in TRβ-deficient mice (12, 13).
Abnormal Cochlear Morphology in Dio2-/- Mice. Histological analysis in Dio2-/- mice revealed retarded differentiation of the cochlear inner sulcus and sensory epithelium and deformity of the TM, a secreted extracellular matrix that is necessary for the response of the mechanosensitive hair cells to sound stimulation (30). The defects detected in Dio2-/- mice resided in known thyroid hormone-sensitive tissues in the cochlear interior rather than in the surrounding connective tissues that normally express D2 (i.e., the cochlear capsule, the septal divisions between the turns of the cochlea, and the modiolus) (27).
Normally at P8, the sensory epithelium forms three distinct rows of outer hair cells and one row of inner hair cells separated by the tunnel of Corti, whereas the inner sulcus epithelium is partly retracted below the TM (Fig. 3A). In the adult, the TM extends fully across the cavity of the inner sulcus to contact the stereociliary bundles of the hair cells (Fig. 3D). In Dio2-/- pups at P8, the sensory epithelium was poorly differentiated, the tunnel of Corti was unopened, and the inner sulcus was only at an early stage of formation (Fig. 3B). The inner sulcus epithelium was thicker with taller columnar cells than in WT pups. The TM was enlarged and attached for most of its length to the underlying epithelium. Occasionally, the TM was thinner and the inner sulcus was partly developed, suggesting variable penetrance for part of the phenotype (Fig. 3C). However, all Dio2-/- pups showed retarded differentiation of the sensory epithelium. The TM enlargement was evident as early as P4 but other morphological changes were not observed before P4 in Dio2-/- mice.
In adult Dio2-/- mice, the differentiation of many features of the sensory epithelium and the opening of the tunnel of Corti had progressed to resemble the WT cochlea. The TM, however, remained variably malformed (Fig. 3E). The TM deformity was usually slight in adults although Fig. 3F shows an extreme example with a severely malformed TM and disorganization of the sensory epithelium, indicating degeneration or aborted development of these tissues.
The ultrastructure of the TM in Dio2-/- mice was also abnormal. The normal TM contains a series of major collagen fibrils embedded in a striated sheet matrix of fine filaments (Fig. 4A) (34). In Dio2-/- mice, the major fibrils were present but the striated sheet matrix was disorganized in the middle and upper regions of the TM (Fig. 4B). The matrix, however, was normal in lower regions of the TM lying closest to the inner sulcus. The TM still contained the major α- and β-tectorin glycoproteins as found in WT mice (Fig. 4C) (30). This finding suggests, that as in TR-deficient mice, the lack of D2 does not block expression of TM components but instead may impair their assembly or processing. The cochlear defects in Dio2-/- mice and the TM deformity with a partial disorganization of ultrastructure closely resembled the phenotype in TRβ-deficient mice. The TM abnormalities, however, were milder than in mice lacking both TRβ and TRα1, in which ultrastructural disorganization occurred throughout all regions of the TM (13).
Recovery of Auditory Sensitivity by T3 Administration. The auditory phenotype in Dio2-/- mice was remarkably similar to that caused by hypothyroidism despite the fact that Dio2-/- mice possess serum levels of T4 and T3 that would normally be adequate for the development of hearing. This finding suggests that D2 is required to generate T3 in the auditory system above levels available in serum in postnatal development. Therefore, we tested whether T3 supplementation could overcome such a local T3 insufficiency in Dio2-/- mice. T3 was added at different starting points to the drinking water of nursing Dio2+/- dams or weaned progeny until P28 when the ABR was measured. Treatment from P10 with 0.3 μg/ml T3 resulted in 2- to 5-fold increases in serum T3 when measured at P16 (Fig. 5B). After weaning at P21, mice that ingested T3 directly had 8- to 12-fold increased serum T3 levels (n = 8).
T3 given from P10 improved the mean ABR thresholds by ≈30 dB SPL in Dio2-/- mice compared to untreated Dio2-/- mice (Fig. 5A). The improvement was nearly complete in most Dio2-/- mice although 30% showed only a limited recovery. A lesser degree of correction was achieved when T3 was given later. Treatment of Dio2-/- pups from P16 improved ABR thresholds by ≈10 dB SPL, whereas treatment from P23 did not correct thresholds. T3 treatment of Dio2-/- mice also enhanced the definition of the waveform (Fig. 5C and see untreated example in Fig. 2B) and improved its latency (with T3 treatment from P10, peak IV latency was shortened from 5.75 ± 0.19 to 4.87 ± 0.31 ms; n = 8; P <0.01). Thresholds were in the normal range in Dio2+/- or WT controls regardless of treatment.
Higher T3 doses produced systemic toxicity but paradoxically still improved ABR thresholds. T3 treatment (1 μg/ml) begun in utero retarded body growth of Dio2-/- pups, which attained ≈60% of untreated weight at weaning (at P22, Dio2-/- female treated, 5.8 ± 1.2, untreated 9.6 ± 0.4 g; male treated, 4.9 ± 1.0, untreated 9.2 ± 0.7 g; n = 4–6; P <0.001). Mice in these treated groups showed ≥30 dB SPL improvements in ABR thresholds compared to untreated Dio2-/- mice (n = 14; P <0.001), although 30% (4 of 14) had only slight improvement. Treatment of Dio2+/- control mice from embryonic stages, but not from P10 or later, also resulted in some progeny (3 of 12) acquiring a defective ABR. These findings suggest that the embryonic or neonatal auditory system is susceptible to impairment by excessive T3 regardless of genotype. The improvement of auditory sensitivity by T3 administration identified a T3 deficiency as the critical defect underlying the deafness in Dio2-/- mice, in accord with the activity of D2 in generating T3.
T3 treatment also improved cochlear differentiation in Dio2-/- mice. In untreated Dio2-/- mice at P16 (Fig. 5D), differentiation had progressed from the immature state shown at P8 in Fig. 3B to form distinct hair cells and an open tunnel of Corti. However, the inner sulcus epithelium adjacent to the inner hair cells was thicker with a denser array of columnar cells than in Dio2+/- pups and the TM remained malformed. In Dio2-/- pups treated with T3 from P10 until analysis at P16, morphology more closely resembled the normal state for that stage of development with a better differentiated inner sulcus epithelium and thinner TM (Fig. 5E). T3 treatment did not produce obvious abnormalities in Dio2+/- control pups (Fig. 5 F and G).
Discussion
This study reveals that D2 is essential for the development of hearing. The similarity of the cochlear phenotypes caused by D2 or TR deficiency suggests that D2 controls the T3 signal in the cochlea to activate the TR at a critical phase of development. On a comparative scale, the auditory phenotype in Dio2-/- mice is slightly worse than in TRβ-deficient mice but is milder than that caused by deletion of both TRβ and TRα1 (13) or by severe systemic hypothyroidism (1). The differences in severity may be explained if the normal to slightly increased levels of circulating T3 in Dio2-/- pups provide small amounts of ligand that stimulate limited activity by TRβ and TRα1 in the cochlea. In contrast, systemic hypothyroidism or the deletion of all TRs would cause a more absolute block of thyroid hormone signaling. The variable severity of some features of the Dio2-/- phenotype is consistent with the enzymic role of D2 in generating subtle T3 fluxes in the cochlea, which may be expected to vary somewhat among individuals.
Why is the development of the auditory system so dependent on D2 and why would the maturing cochlea in effect stimulate its own response to thyroid hormone? The finding that normal or marginally increased serum levels of T3 are inadequate for the demands of the cochlea supports the role of D2 as a tissue-specific amplifier of T3 action. Thus, D2 would draw on the T4 supply in serum and convert this into T3 at the necessary stage of development. The demands for T3 in the postnatal cochlea may be considerable given the range of differentiation events that require thyroid hormone in the inner sulcus, sensory epithelium, spiral ganglion, and auditory nerve and in the formation of the TM (1, 3, 11, 13, 15). D2 may have other functions in central auditory pathways because D2 mRNA is also expressed widely in the brain, including in central auditory regions (24). Indeed, the poor overall definition and prolonged latency of the ABR waveform in Dio2-/- mice raises the possibility that defects exist not only in the cochlea but also in the auditory nerve and brainstem auditory regions. Further study is necessary to determine whether there is any type of brain defect in Dio2-/- mice. The improvement of auditory sensitivity by high T3 doses that otherwise retard body growth in Dio2-/- pups emphasizes the differential demands of the auditory and other systems for T3 at certain developmental stages. Thus, the local amplification of the hormonal signal by D2 would provide an efficient means of coordinating multiple developmental events in the maturing auditory system. Moreover, the location of D2 in the auditory system itself may confer immediacy in prompting the timely maturation of this sensory system.
The results suggest that T3 signaling regulates not only the onset of auditory function but also the subsequent maturation of auditory sensitivity. The maturation of auditory function in rodents occurs over a protracted period lasting until ≈P20 (6, 7). A continuing role for D2 over this period would explain why T3 administration begun as late as P16 partly improves auditory sensitivity in Dio2-/- mice. Possibly, some functions are simply arrested and the later provision of T3 is able to reactivate these differentiation events. The chambered structure of the cochlea points to the likelihood that D2 function is integrated with currently unknown mechanisms that would transport specific forms of thyroid hormones across the compartments of the cochlear microenvironment. A paracrine-like action of thyroid hormone may therefore operate involving T4 uptake, the generation of T3 by D2, and the release of this T3 to stimulate responsive tissues in the cochlear interior.
D3, a thyroid hormone-inactivating enzyme, has been shown to regulate Xenopus eye development, probably by reducing local levels of thyroid hormone in the dorsal retina (25). Our results suggest that the hormone-activating D2 enzyme provides an equally potent developmental control but through an opposite mechanism of amplifying T3 action. Thus, both enzymes may promote critical tissue-specific variations in local T3 levels in development. Somewhat analogously, the enzymes that synthesize and degrade retinoic acid are thought to control the activity of retinoid receptors (35). The findings in Dio2-/- mice suggest that the amplification of thyroid hormone action in the target organ itself provides an important developmental control in the auditory system.
Acknowledgments
This article is dedicated to the memory of our colleague Alfons Rüsch. We thank Michael Weiss for technical assistance. This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grant DC-03441 and a Hirschl Award (to D.F.), National Institutes of Health Grants HD-09020 (to V.A.G.) and DK-42271 (to D.L.S.), the Intramural Program at National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (M.W.K.), and Wellcome Trust Grant 05740/Z/99Z (to R.J.G and G.P.R.).
This paper was submitted directly (Track II) to the PNAS office.
Abbreviations: D1, deiodinase type 1; D2, deiodinase type 2; D3, deiodinase type 3; TR, thyroid hormone receptor; T3, triiodothyronine; T4, thyroxine; ABR, auditory-evoked brainstem response; TM, tectorial membrane; P(n), postnatal day n; SPL, sound pressure level.
References
- 1.Deol, M. S. (1973) J. Med. Genet. 10, 235-242. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Van Middlesworth, L. & Norris, C. (1980) Endocrinology 106, 1686-1690. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Uziel, A., Gabrion, J., Ohresser, M. & Legrand, C. (1981) Acta Otolaryngol. 92, 469-480. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Rovet, J., Walker, W., Bliss, B., Buchanan, L. & Ehrlich, R. (1996) J. Pediatr. 128, 776-783. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Forrest, D., Reh, T. & Rüsch, A. (2002) Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 12, 49-56. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Geal-Dor, M., Freeman, S., Li, G. & Sohmer, H. (1993) Hear. Res. 69, 236-242. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Pujol, R., Lavigne-Rebillard, M. & Lenoir, M. (1997) in Development of the Auditory System, eds. Rubel, E., Popper, A. & Fay, R. (Springer, New York), pp. 146-192.
- 8.O'Malley, B. W., Li, D. & Turner, D. S. (1995) Hear. Res. 88, 181-189. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Knipper, M., Richardson, G., Mack, A., Muller, M., Goodyear, R., Limberger, A., Rohbock, K., Kopschall, I., Zenner, H. P. & Zimmermann, U. (2001) J. Biol. Chem. 276, 39046-39052. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Bradley, D. J., Towle, H. C. & Young, W. S., III (1994) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91, 439-443. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Knipper, M., Bandtlow, C., Gestwa, L., Kopschall, I., Rohbock, K., Wiechers, B., Zenner, H.-P. & Zimmermann, U. (1998) Development (Cambridge, U.K.) 125, 3709-3718. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Forrest, D., Erway, L. C., Ng, L., Altschuler, R. & Curran, T. (1996) Nat. Genet. 13, 354-357. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Rüsch, A., Ng, L., Goodyear, R., Oliver, D., Lisoukov, I., Vennström, B., Richardson, G., Kelley, M. W. & Forrest, D. (2001) J. Neurosci. 21, 9792-9800. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Gauthier, K., Plateroti, M., Harvey, C. B., Williams, G. R., Weiss, R. E., Refetoff, S., Willott, J. F., Sundin, V., Roux, J. P., Malaval, L., et al. (2001) Mol. Cell. Biol. 21, 4748-4760. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Griffith, A. J., Szymko, Y. M., Kaneshige, M., Quinonez, R. E., Kaneshige, K., Heintz, K. A., Mastroianni, M. A., Kelley, M. W. & Cheng, S. Y. (2002) J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol. 3, 279-288. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Refetoff, S., Weiss, R. E. & Usala, S. J. (1993) Endocr. Rev. 14, 348-399. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Brucker-Davis, F., Skarulis, M. C., Pikus, A., Ishizawar, D., Mastroianni, M.-A., Koby, M. & Weintraub, B. D. (1996) J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 81, 2768-2772. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Phillips, S. A., Rotman-Pikielny, P., Lazar, J., Ando, S., Hauser, P., Skarulis, M. C., Brucker-Davis, F. & Yen, P. M. (2001) J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 86, 5142-5147. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.St. Germain, D. & Galton, V. (1997) Thyroid 7, 655-668. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Bianco, A. C., Salvatore, D., Gereben, B., Berry, M. J. & Larsen, P. R. (2002) Endocr. Rev. 23, 38-89. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Galton, V. A. (2003) Hot Thyroidology. Issue 2 (May). Available at www.hotthyroidology.com. Accessed February 9, 2004.
- 22.Becker, K., Stephens, K., Davey, J., Schneider, M. & Galton, V. (1997) Endocrinology 138, 2989-2997. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Berry, D. L., Rose, C. S., Remo, B. F. & Brown, D. D. (1998) Dev. Biol. 203, 24-35. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Guadaño-Ferraz, A., Escámez, M., Rausell, E. & Bernal, J. (1999) J. Neurosci. 19, 3430-3439. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Marsh-Armstrong, N., Huang, H., Remo, B. F., Liu, T. T. & Brown, D. D. (1999) Neuron 24, 871-878. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Peeters, R., Fekete, C., Goncalves, C., Legradi, G., Tu, H. M., Harney, J. W., Bianco, A. C., Lechan, R. M. & Larsen, P. R. (2001) Am. J. Physiol. 281, E54-E61. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Campos-Barros, A., Amma, L. L., Faris, J. S., Shailam, R., Kelley, M. W. & Forrest, D. (2000) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97, 1287-1292. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Schneider, M. J., Fiering, S. N., Pallud, S. E., Parlow, A. F., St. Germain, D. L. & Galton, V. A. (2001) Mol. Endocrinol. 15, 2137-2148. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Zheng, Q. Y., Johnson, K. R. & Erway, L. C. (1999) Hear. Res. 130, 94-107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Legan, P. K., Lukashkina, V. A., Goodyear, R. J., Kössl, M., Russell, I. J. & Richardson, G. P. (2000) Neuron 28, 273-285. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.de Jesus, L. A., Carvalho, S. D., Ribeiro, M. O., Schneider, M., Kim, S. W., Harney, J. W., Larsen, P. R. & Bianco, A. C. (2001) J. Clin. Invest. 108, 1379-1385. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Freeman, S., Geal-Dor, M., Shimoni, Y. & Sohmer, H. (1993) Hear. Res. 69, 229-235. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Parham, K., Sun, X.-M. & Kim, D. (2001) in Handbook of Mouse Auditory Research, ed. Willott, J. (CRC, Boca Raton, FL), pp. 37-58.
- 34.Hasko, J. & Richardson, G. P. (1987) Hear. Res. 35, 21-38. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Niederreither, K., Abu-Abed, S., Schuhbaur, B., Petkovich, M., Chambon, P. & Dolle, P. (2002) Nat. Genet. 31, 84-88. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]