Abstract
Proteins are not static entities. They are highly mobile, and their steady-state levels are achieved by a balance between ongoing synthesis and degradation. The dynamic properties of a protein can have important consequences for its function. For example, when a protein is degraded and replaced by a newly synthesized one, posttranslational modifications are lost and need to be reincorporated in the new molecules. Protein stability and mobility are also relevant for the duplication of macromolecular structures or organelles, which involves coordination of protein inheritance with the synthesis and assembly of newly synthesized proteins. To measure protein dynamics, we recently developed a genetic pulse-chase assay called recombination-induced tag exchange (RITE). RITE has been successfully used in Saccharomyces cerevisiae to measure turnover and inheritance of histone proteins, to study changes in posttranslational modifications on aging proteins, and to visualize the spatiotemporal inheritance of protein complexes and organelles in dividing cells. Here we describe a series of successful RITE cassettes that are designed for biochemical analyses, genomics studies, as well as single cell fluorescence applications. Importantly, the genetic nature and the stability of the tag switch offer the unique possibility to combine RITE with high-throughput screening for protein dynamics mutants and mechanisms. The RITE cassettes are widely applicable, modular by design, and can therefore be easily adapted for use in other cell types or organisms.
Keywords: pulse-chase, epitope tag, protein turnover, protein inheritance
Epitope tags provide powerful tools to study protein properties. In general, epitope tags provide a static snapshot of proteins in the cell. However, most proteins are dynamic, and this is often an important aspect of their function (Russel et al. 2009; Hinkson and Elias 2011). For example, protein dynamics can influence the mobility and inheritance of proteins, the exchange of subunits of macromolecular complexes, access to otherwise-occupied interaction sites of proteins or, when proteins are degraded and replaced by new ones, in resetting posttranslational modifications (Hager et al. 2009; Radman-Livaja et al. 2011; Hotz et al. 2012; Menendez-Benito et al. 2013). During the past few years, several techniques have been developed to measure or visualize protein dynamics. Some of these techniques, such as FRAP (fluorescence recovery after photobleaching), TimeStamp, or derivatives thereof, make use of fluorescent fusion proteins to follow the movement or stability and synthesis of proteins in single cells (Lin and Tsien 2010; Butko et al. 2012). Other methods involve differential labeling of old and new proteins by using SILAC (Stable Isotope Labeling with Amino Acids in Cell Culture), radioactive labels, or labeling of specific proteins by using SNAP tags or FlAsH-ReAsH technology (Jansen et al. 2007; Adams and Tsien 2008; Sweet et al. 2010; Zee et al. 2010; Ray-Gallet et al. 2011). Most of these methods allow detection of old and new proteins, but only few methods provide the opportunity to specifically purify old and/or newly synthesized proteins by biochemical methods. This aspect is particularly relevant for the study of chromatin protein dynamics, where affinity purification allows mapping of protein occupancy and dynamics on specific regions of the genome.
Several methods recently have been developed to measure chromatin protein dynamics (recently reviewed in Deal and Henikoff 2010a). One is the use of inducible overexpression of a tagged version of the protein of interest in the presence of an endogenously expressed untagged (or differentially tagged) copy (Korber et al. 2004; Dion et al. 2007; Jamai et al. 2007; Kim et al. 2007; Rufiange et al. 2007). Another method (CATCH-IT; covalent attachment of tags to capture histones and identify turnover) involves the labeling of newly synthesized proteins by amino acid analogs that can be coupled to biotin and thereby used for selective purification (Deal and Henikoff 2010a,b). In Physarum, the dynamics of histone proteins can be monitored at the single-cell level by microinjection of small amounts of labeled histone proteins (Thiriet and Hayes 2005; Ejlassi-Lassallette et al. 2011). We recently developed a versatile and flexible method called recombination-induced tag exchange (RITE), in which epitope tags on an endogenous protein of interest can be swapped in a conditional manner by an inducible Cre recombinase (Verzijlbergen et al. 2010; De Vos et al. 2011; Radman-Livaja et al. 2011; Hotz et al. 2012).
The RITE system has been developed in budding yeast and is composed of two parts; a tandem-tag cassette that can be integrated behind the gene of interest for conditional C-terminal tagging, and a stably integrated and constitutively expressed hormone-dependent Cre recombinase that allows control of epitope switching. RITE cassettes encode for one epitope tag (Tag 1 or old tag) between two LoxP recombination sites and a second, orphan, epitope tag (Tag 2 or new tag) downstream of the second LoxP site (Figure 1A). Upon activation of Cre recombinase activity by the simple addition of the hormone estradiol, a tag switch occurs: the first tag is removed from the genome by recombination between the two LoxP sites and replaced by the second tag. To prevent background recombination, the RITE cassettes contain a selectable marker between the LoxP sites. Note that the LoxP recombination sequence is part of the protein coding sequence in the RITE cassettes, resulting in an in-frame tag following the LoxP sites and allowing for switching by recombination.
RITE has several advantages over some of the other methods to measure protein dynamics. The proteins of interest are expressed form their endogenous promoter, avoiding potential problems with overexpression. In addition, a RITE switch does not require specific media changes and is permanent, which allows monitoring of protein dynamics under many different physiological conditions (De Vos et al. 2011; Radman-Livaja et al. 2011; Hotz et al. 2012; Ouellet and Barral 2012; Menendez-Benito et al. 2013). Importantly, old and newly synthesized proteins can be monitored simultaneously. The RITE system is flexible, widely applicable, and compatible with switching between different short epitope tags as well as fluorescent tags. Furthermore, RITE allows selective tagging and following one protein of interest in the context of all other unlabeled protein. Finally, RITE allows dynamics measurements in the context of a genetic screen, allowing identification of proteins controlling protein turnover (Verzijlbergen et al. 2011; Hotz et al. 2012). Of note, proteins that are subject to very high turnover may not be suitable for analysis by RITE because Cre-induced recombination of the LoxP sites takes several hours to complete (see Results and Discussion and Verzijlbergen et al. 2010).
Here we present a comprehensive toolbox for the RITE assay. The availability of a RITE cassette series containing diverse biochemical and fluorescent tags allows for selection of tag pairs that are optimal for the protein of interest or for the experimental setup. Furthermore, new RITE cassettes with additional invariant tags are presented that bypass the need for protein-specific antibodies and allow for simultaneous detection of old and new protein (Figure 1B). The RITE cassettes are modular by design. Therefore, they can be easily adapted to modify tags or to adjust cassettes for use in other cell types or organisms for which inducible Cre recombinases are available.
Materials and Methods
Strains and growth conditions
Yeast and bacteria were cultured under standard conditions (van Leeuwen and Gottschling 2002). Escherichia coli strain DH5α was used for plasmid preparations. All yeast strains constructed and used in this study are detailed in Table 1 and were derived from previously published strains (Brachmann et al. 1998; van Leeuwen et al. 2002; Tong and Boone 2006; Verzijlbergen et al. 2010; De Vos et al. 2011; Verzijlbergen et al. 2011). Strains were grown in YEPD (1% yeast extract, 2% bacto peptone, 2% glucose) in shaking flasks at 30°. To select for Hygromycin resistance, cells were grown in YEPD containing 200 µg/mL Hygromycin B (Invitrogen).
Table 1. Yeast strains.
Name | Relevant Genotype | Switch Parent | Sourcea |
---|---|---|---|
NKI2036b | MATa his3Δ1 leu2Δ0 lys2Δ0 met15Δ0 ura3Δ0 hhf1-hht1Δ::LEU2 | KV | |
NKI2148 | NKI2036; bar1Δ::HisG his3Δ1::HIS3-PTDH3-CRE-EBD78 hht2::HHT2-LoxP-HA-TADH1-HphMX-LoxP-T7 | KV | |
NKI8085 | NKI2036; hht2::HHT2-LoxP-T7 | NKI2148 | This study |
NKI2158 | NKI2036; TCYC1::PTDH3-CRE-EBD78-HIS3 hht2::HHT2-LoxP-T7-TADH1-HphMX-LoxP-HA | KV | |
NKI4138 | NKI2036; hht2::HHT2-LoxP-HA | NKI2158 | This study |
BY4733 | MATa his3Δ200 leu2Δ0 met15Δ0 trp1Δ63 ura3Δ0 | CB | |
NKI8001 | BY4733; bar1Δ::HISG his3::HIS3-PTDH3-CRE-EBD78 | This study | |
NKI2176 | BY4733; hht1-hhf1::MET15 bar1Δ::HisG his3Δ200::HIS3-PTDH3-CRE-EBD78 | This study | |
NKI2178 | NKI2176; hht2::HHT2-LoxP-HA-6xHis-TADH1-HphMX-LoxP-T7 | This study | |
NKI8086 | NKI2176; hht2::HHT2-LoxP-T7 | NKI2178 | This study |
NKI2220 | NKI2176; hht2::HHT2-LoxP-T7- TADH1-HphMX-LoxP-HA-6xHis | This study | |
NKI8037 | NKI2220; hht2::HHT2-LoxP-HA-6xHis | NKI2220 | This study |
NKI8051 | NKI2176; hht2::HHT2-LoxP-2xT7- TADH1-HphMX-LoxP-HA-6xHis | This study | |
NKI8088 | NKI8051; hht2::HHT2-LoxP-HA-6xHis | NKI8051 | This study |
NKI8056 | NKI2176; hht2::HHT2-LoxP-HA-6xHIS- TADH1-HphMX-LoxP-V5 | This study | |
NKI8058 | NKI8056; hht2::HHT2-LoxP-V5 | NKI8056 | This study |
NKI8050 | NKI2176; hht2::HHT2-LoxP-V5- TADH1-HphMX-LoxP-HA-6xHis | This study | |
NKI8087 | NKI8050; hht2::HHT2-LoxP-HA-6xHis | NKI8050 | This study |
NKI8052 | NKI2176; hht2::HHT2-LoxP-2xFLAG- TADH1-HphMX-LoxP-HA-6xHis | This study | |
NKI8089 | NKI8052; hht2::HHT2-LoxP-HA-6xHis | NKI8052 | This study |
NKI8030 | NKI8001; htz1::HTZ1-LoxP-HA-6xHIS-TADH1-HphMX-LoxP-T7 | ||
NKI8053 | NKI8001; htz1::HTZ1-LoxP-V5-TADH1-HphMX-LoxP-HA-6xHIS | ||
NKI8054 | NKI8001; htz1::HTZ1-LoxP-2xT7-TADH1-HphMX-LoxP-HA-6xHIS | ||
NKI8055 | NKI8001; htz1::HTZ1-LoxP-2xFLAG-TADH1-HphMX-LoxP-HA-6xHIS | ||
NKI4044 | BY4733; pgk1::PGK1-V5-LoxP-HA-yEGFP- TADH1-HphMX-LoxP-T7-mRFP | This study | |
NKI4044post | NKI4044; pgk1::PGK1-LoxP-T7-mRFP | NKI4044 | This study |
Y7092 | MATα can1Δ::PSTE2-Sp-his5 lyp1Δ his3Δ1 leu2Δ0 ura3Δ0 met15Δ0 | AT | |
SPC42G | Y7092; lyp1Δ::NATMX-PTDH3-CRE-EBD78 spc42::SPC42-loxP-T7- TADH1-HphMX-loxP-HA-GFP | This study | |
SPC42Gpost | SPC42G; spc42::SPC42-loxP-HA-GFP | SPC42G | This study |
SPC42R | Y7092; lyp1Δ::NATMX-PTDH3-CRE-EBD78 spc42::SPC42-LoxP-3xHA- TADH1-HphMX-LoxP-3xT7-mRFP | This study | |
SPC42Rpost | SPC42R; spc42::SPC42-LoxP-3xT7-mRFP | SPC42R | This study |
Sources: Verzijlbergen et al. 2010; Brachmann et al. 1998; Tong et al. 2006; van Leeuwen et al. 2002, see Materials and Methods.
NKI2036 was derived from crosses between BY4742, BY4727, and UCC1369 (CB and FvL).
Construction of RITE cassettes
All plasmids constructed in this study were derived from the previously described pFvL100 (Verzijlbergen et al. 2010) and are listed in Figure 2A and Supporting Information, File S1. pFvL106 contains a cassette switching from an HA (Hemagglutinin) to a T7 epitope tag (HA→T7), but the HphMX selection marker (the Hygromycin B phospho transferase gene under control of the AgTEF1 promoter and terminator) is replaced by a URA3 selection marker. pFvL118 and pFvL119 (HA→T7) are nearly identical except for small sequence differences around the HphMX gene (Verzijlbergen et al. 2010). For pFvL160, oligos were created containing either 2xT7 with BsrGI overhangs or 2xHA with SpeI overhangs. Single-stranded oligos (Table 2) of matching tags were incubated in 40 mM Tris, pH 8, and 100 mM NaCl in a thermal cycler set at 94° for 3 min with a gradual cooling down to 15°. The double-stranded fragments were purified over a microspin G-50 column (Amersham Biosciences). Oligos were sequentially cloned into pFvL119 digested with the appropriate restriction enzymes. pTW073 was constructed by amplifying a fragment of pFvL118 with primers containing a V5 tag extension and BsrGI restriction sites. Subsequently, this fragment and pFvL118 were digested with BsrGI and ligated together, creating an HA→V5 cassette.
Table 2. Oligos used for plasmid construction.
Oligo | Sequence |
---|---|
CLTSB19a | GTACTATGGCTTCTATGACAGGAGGTCAACAGATGGGAGGAATGGCCTCAATGACCGGTGGCCAGCAAATGGGAT |
CLTSB19b | GTACATCCCATTTGCTGGCCACCGGTCATTGAGGCCATTCCTCCCATCTGTTGACCTCCTGTCATAGAAGCCATA |
CLTSB17a | CTAGCTATCCCTATGACGTCCCGGACTATGCAGGATATCCATATGACGTTCCAGATTACGCTA |
CLTSB17b | CTAGTAGCGTAATCTGGAACGTCATATGGATATCCTGCATAGTCCGGGACGTCATAGGGATAG |
KpnI-V5-SpeI Fwd | CGGTAAGCCTATCCCTAACCCTCTCCTCGGTCTCGATTCTA |
KpnI-V5-SpeI Rev | CTAGTAGAATCGAGACCGAGGAGAGGGTTAGGGATAGGCTTACCGGTAC |
KpnI-2xFLAG-SpeI Fwd | CGACTACAAGGACGATGACGATAAAGATTATAAAGATGACGATGACAAGA |
KpnI-2xFLAG-SpeI Rev | CTAGTCTTGTCATCGTCATCTTTATAATCTTTATCGTCATCGTCCTTGTAGTCGGTAC |
KpnI-2xT7-SpeI Fwd | CATGGCTTCTATGACAGGAGGTCAACAGATGATGGCAAGCATGACTGGTGGACAGCAAATGA |
KpnI-2xT7-SpeI Rev | CTAGTCATTTGCTGTCCACCAGTCATGCTTGCCATCATCTGTTGACCTCCTGTCATAGAAGCCATGGTAC |
Fwd, forward, Rev, reverse.
A 3-step polymerase chain reaction (PCR) approach was used to construct pTW081 and pTW087. Fragments containing either HA flanked by MluI and SphI restriction sites, or T7 flanked by ClaI and NsiI restriction sites were amplified from pFvL118. These fragments and pFvL118 were digested with the respective restriction enzymes and ligated to construct a cassette with swapped tags (pTW081; T7→HA; Verzijlbergen et al. 2010). For pTW087 a fragment containing HA was amplified using primers with a tail of 6xHis, creating an HA-6xHis fragment flanked by ClaI and NsiI restriction sites. The fragment and pFvL118 were digested with ClaI and NsiI and ligated to construct an HA-6xHis→T7 cassette (pTW087; De Vos et al. 2011). An HA-6xHis fragment flanked by BglII and BsrGI restriction sites was amplified by PCR from pTW087. The fragment and pTW081 were digested with these enzymes and ligated, constructing pTW094 (T7→HA-6xHis). For pMT001 (HA-6xHis→V5), plasmids pTW087 and pTW073 were digested with NsiI and MluI. The fragment of pTW087 containing spacer-LoxP-HA-6xHis-TADH1-HphMX was ligated into the fragment of pTW073 containing LoxP-V5. For pMT004-006 a fragment of double stranded DNA containing V5, 2xT7, or 2xFLAG with KpnI and SpeI overhangs were made by oligo annealing (Table 2). Oligos were ligated into pFvL119 digested with KpnI and SpeI. The tags of the resulting plasmids were combined with the HA-6xHis tag of pTW094 using AscI and SphI restriction sites to generate pMT004 (V5→HA-6xHIS), pMT005 (2xT7→HA-6xHIS), and pMT006 (2xFLAG→HA-6xHIS).
pKV005 was constructed by a 3-step PCR on pKV001 (a pFvL119 derivative containing additional restriction sites), introducing an invariant MYC tag between the spacer and LoxP site. The resulting cassette is MYCi-HA→T7. For pKV006, a V5-fragment with Eco47III restriction sites was amplified by PCR. The fragment and pKV001 were digested by Eco47III and ligated, constructing a cassette with an invariant V5 tag between the spacer and LoxP site (V5i-HA→T7). For pKV014, monomeric red fluorescent protein (mRFP) was amplified by PCR with primers containing BsrGI and HindIII restriction sites at the ends. This fragment and pFvL160 were digested with BsrGI and HindIII and ligated, resulting in a cassette with a fluorescent tag post-recombination (3xHA→3xT7-mRFP). For pKV015, yEGFP and mRFP were amplified with primers containing restriction sites for SpeI, and for BsrGI and HindIII, respectively. These fragments and pKV006 were digested with the appropriate enzymes and ligated, resulting in a cassette that combines epitope tags with fluorescent tags, pKV015 (V5i-HA-yEGFP→T7-mRFP, (Verzijlbergen et al. 2010)). For pVM013, pTW081 and pVM012 were digested with BsrGI and HindIII. The small fragment of pVM012 containing yEGFP was ligated into the large fragment of pTW081 (T7→HA), resulting in a T7→HA-yEGFP cassette (Menendez-Benito et al. 2013).
PCR-mediated gene tagging
To target RITE cassettes to the gene of interest, the cassette was amplified using integration primers that contain 40 bp of sequence of the gene of interest for homologous recombination (Figure 2B). The forward primer (F1) sequence of the cassette is 5′-GGT GGA TCT GGT GGA TCT-3′. For pFvL106 to pKV006, the reverse primer used to amplify the cassette is 5′-AGGGAACAAAAGCTTGCATG-3′ (R1), which anneals 54 bp downstream of the cassette. For pKV014 to pKV016 the reverse primer sequence of the cassette is 5′-TCAGGCGCCGGTGGAGTGGCG-3′ (R3). This primer is mRFP specific and anneals at the end of mRFP to introduce a stop codon (underlined sequence), which is missing in the mRFP sequence. The reverse primer used for pVM013 is 5′-TGATTACGCCAAGCTCG-3′ (R2), which anneals further downstream than R1 (90 bp downstream of the cassette) and which can be used when the sequence of R1 is absent. For one strain in this study (SPC42G), a reverse primer was used that anneals even further downstream of the cassette. When designing primers to target RITE to the gene of interest, it is important that the reading frame of the ORF and the fused cassette is maintained. The PCR products were transformed into strain NKI2176, NKI2036 or Y7092 using standard transformation protocols (Gietz and Schiestl 2007). After transformation, cells were plated onto YEPD plates and incubated overnight at 30°; the following day plates were replica-plated onto selection plates (YEPD containing 200 µg/mL Hygromycin). Integration of the cassettes was checked by colony PCR.
Cre recombinase vectors
Two plasmids were constructed to integrate Cre recombinase in the yeast genome. pTW040 was constructed by cloning a PTDH3-Cre-EBD78 fragment digested with PvuII into pRS303 digested with SmaI. For the PTDH3-Cre-EBD78 fragment, PTDH3 was cloned with ApaI and BspEI upstream of Cre-EBD78, where the PGAL had been replaced by a multiple cloning site. pSS146 was constructed by cloning the PTDH3-Cre-EBD78 fragment of pTW040 into pRS306 with EcoRI and NotI. Both plasmids contain unique restriction sites that can be used to integrate Cre-Recombinase at the HIS3 locus, the URA3 locus or the CYC1 terminator (Figure 2C).
Detection of recombination by Southern blot
For Southern blotting 5 × 108 cells were spun and frozen at −80°. A histone H3 (HHT2)-specific probe was made by PCR amplification using primers HHT2_HindIII_for (GAATCTTTCTGTGACGCTTGG) and HHT2_HindIII_rev (GGGGAAGAACAGTTGGAAGG), resulting in a 650-bp amplicon covering the region 576,144–576,794 of chromosome XIV. When used on genomic DNA that was digested with HindIII, the three bands recognized are specific for before the switch (3000 bp, pre), after the switch (931 bp, post), or as an internal control (1538 bp, control). Radioactive Southern blotting was performed using 50 μCi of 32P-dCTP; incubation occurred overnight at 65°.
Protein detection by immunoblot and antibodies
For immunoblotting, strains were grown to mid-log phase (OD660 0.6-0.9). Samples of 2 × 108 cells were harvested and washed with TE [10 mM Tris, pH 8; 1 mM ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA)] containing 0.2 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (PMSF). Cell pellets were stored at −80° until further processing, but at least 30 min. Whole-cell extracts were prepared in SUMEB (1% sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS); 8 M urea; 10 mM 3-(N-morpholino)propanesulfonic acid (MOPS), pH 6.8; 10 mM EDTA; 0.01% bromophenol blue) containing protease inhibitors (1 mM PMSF, 1 mM dithiothreitol (DTT), 5 mM benzamidine, 1 µg/mL pepstatin, 1 µg/mL leupeptin) by glass bead disruption in a multivortex. The resulting lysate was incubated for 10 min at 65° and subsequently clarified by centrifuging 5 min at 20,817 x g. Before immunoblotting, 4 to 10 µL of lysate was separated on a polyacrylamide gel (16% for histone H3 and H2B, 10% for Pgk1, Spc42, and Sir2). Separated proteins were transferred to a 0.45-µm nitrocellulose membrane for one (H3 and H2B) or two (Pgk1, Spc42, and Sir2) hours at 0.1 A. Membranes were blocked with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) containing 2% or 5% Nutrilon (Nutricia) for 1 hr, and first antibody incubations were done either for 2 hr at room temperature or overnight at 4° in Tris-buffered saline containing 10% Tween-20 (TBST) with 2% Nutrilon. After washing three times in TBST, secondary antibody incubation was performed in TBST with 2% Nutrilon and LI-COR Odyssey IRDye 800CW antibody at 1:10,000 for 45 min at room temperature in the dark followed by 10-minute washes twice in TBST and once in PBS. Membranes were scanned using a LI-COR Odyssey IR Imager (Biosciences) and analyzed using the Odyssey LI-COR software package version 3.0. Antibodies used in this study are Pgk1 (A-6457, Invitrogen), Sir2 (Sc-6666, Santa Cruz), histone H2B (39238, Active Motif), HA (12CA5), T7 (A190-117A, Bethyl), Flag (M2 F3165, Sigma), V5 (R960-25, Invitrogen), histone H3 and LoxP (Verzijlbergen et al. 2010), and green fluorescent protein (GFP) and mRFP (Rocha et al. 2009).
Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP)
For ChIP, cells were grown to mid-log phase in YEPD with 200 µg/mL Hygromycin for preswitch strains or YEPD for postswitch strains. Samples of 1−3 × 109 cells were taken, fixed for 10 min in 1% formaldehyde, and washed with cold TBS. Pellets were stored in 12-mL flat bottom-tubes or 2-mL screw-cap tubes at −80° until further processing. Cells in 12-mL tubes were disrupted in 300 µL of breaking buffer (100 mM Tris, pH 7.9; 20% glycerol; protease inhibitor cocktail EDTA-free; Roche) with 400 µL of glass beads in a multivortex for 20 min at 4°. Cells in screw-cap tubes were disrupted in 200 µL of breaking buffer with 500 µL of glass beads in a bead beater in a 4° cold block for 2 min. Lysis was at least 70%, as determined by microscopy. Lysates were transferred to 1.5- or 2-mL tubes and 1 mL of FA buffer (50 mM 4-(2-hydroxyethyl)-1-piperazineethanesulfonic acid-KOH (HEPES-KOH), pH 7.5; 140 mM NaCl; 1 mM EDTA; 1% Triton X-100; 0.1% Na-deoxycholate; protease inhibitor cocktail EDTA-free) was added. The mixture was centrifuged for 1 min at 20,817 x g at 4°, and the pellet was washed once more with FA buffer.
The pellet was resuspended in 450 µL of FA, divided over two 1.5-mL tubes, and sonicated for 6−7 min in a Bioruptor (Diagenode) with 30 sec on-off cycles on high power. Lysates were cleared by centrifugation for 5 min at 4° at 20,817 x g. Supernatant containing chromatin was transferred to 1.5-mL tube and 1 mL of FA was added to samples of the 12-mL tubes. Screw-cap tube chromatin samples were treated with micrococcal nuclease to generate mononucleosomes. For these samples, 800 µL of final buffer (15 mM Tris, pH 7.4; 50 mM NaCl; 1.5 mM CaCl2; 5 mM β-mercaptoethanol; 5 mM MgCl2) was added. Samples were incubated with 30 units of micrococcal nuclease (Fermentas) at 37° for 20 min. The reaction was stopped by adding ethylene glycol tetraacetic (EGTA) acid and EDTA to a final concentration of 10 mM and placing tubes on ice. The chromatin solution was centrifuged for 15 min at 20,817 x g at 4°; the supernatant was transferred to a new 1.5-mL tube and stored at −20°.
Magnetic dynabeads coupled with Protein G (Dynal) were incubated in PBS containing 5 mg/mL bovine serum albumin (BSA) with antibody for at least 4 hr at 4°. Then, 200 µL of soluble chromatin was added to prepared dynabeads and incubated rotating overnight at 4° and 1 mL of FA buffer was added and samples were incubated rotating for 5 min at room temperature. The samples were washed twice with each of the buffers FA, FA-HS (50 mM HEPES-KOH, pH 7.5; 500 mM NaCl; 1 mM EDTA; 1% Triton X-100; 0.1% Na-deoxycholate), RIPA (10 mM Tris, pH 8; 250 mM LiCl; 0.5% NP-40; 0.5% Na-deoxycholate; 1 mM EDTA). Finally, the samples were washed once with TE (10 mM Tris, pH 8; 1 mM EDTA). Then 100 µL of elution buffer (50 mM Tris, pH 8; 10 mM EDTA; 1% SDS) was added to the samples and incubated for 10 min at 65°. Subsequently the samples were centrifuged 1 min at 20,817 x g and 80 µL of supernatant was collected. Then, 70 µL of TE was added to samples and cross links were reversed in 0.625 mg/mL ProtK and 3 µg/mL RNaseA incubated for 1 hr at 50° and subsequently overnight at 65°. For input samples, 40 µL of chromatin solution was combined with 60 µl elution buffer and 70 µL of TE and treated in the same manner as IP samples to reverse cross links. DNA was purified by using the High Pure PCR Product Purification Kit (Roche). Alternatively, DNA was extracted by using Chelex-100 resin (Bio-Rad) (Walsh et al. 1991; Nelson et al. 2009).
Quantitative PCR
Quantitative real time-PCR (qPCR) was performed with SYBRgreen master mix (Applied Biosystems or Roche) according to the manufacturer’s manual. IP samples were diluted 10 times, and input samples were diluted 100 times before analyzing by qPCR on a 7500 Fast Real-Time PCR system (Applied Biosystems) or LightCycler 480 II (Roche). qPCR primers are shown in Table 3.
Table 3. Primer sequences used for qPCR.
Primer | Sequence |
---|---|
PTC6_Qfor | ATCGGGGCAATTAAGCATC |
PTC6_Qrev | CCCGTAACAAGTCCAGCTTC |
RSA4_Qfor | TCTCTGGGAAGTTGAGCCTCTT |
RSA4_Qrev | CACAATATACAGATGTCCACCCTGAT |
SPA2_Qfor | ATCAAGAGAAGAGGGTTCGACAAG |
SPA2_Qrev | CATCGGCTGCGGTAATGG |
qPCR, quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction.
Microscopy
Microscopy samples were fixed with 4% formaldehyde, stained with 1 μg/mL Hoechst 33342 (Invitrogen) and mounted with Vectashield solution (Vector Laboratories) onto concanavalin A−coated cover slides. Samples were analyzed on a Leica SP5 confocal system using a 405-nm laser to excite Hoechst, 488 nm for yEGFP and 561 nm for mRFP.
Results and Discussion
RITE cassette and Cre vector construction
RITE cassettes containing different combinations of small epitope tags or fluorescent tags were generated by combining tag modules of previously described RITE cassettes or with new epitope tags as described in the section Materials and Methods. The RITE cassettes are shown in Figure 2A. Many of the RITE cassettes contain unique restriction sites between the different elements, which facilitates modification of the constructs for other applications. Some of the RITE cassettes contain an invariant tag for simultaneous detection of old and new protein using commercially available antibodies. The cassettes can be integrated by homologous recombination behind any gene of interest (Figure 2B).
Two vectors are available for integration of the hormone-dependent Cre recombinase (Figure 2C). Unique restriction sites in the Cre vectors allow integration of the constructs by single crossover at the CYC1 terminator region, or at the HIS3 or URA3 regions. These options and the efficiency of integration depend on the auxotrophic alleles present in the target strain. For example, targeting of the HIS3-Cre cassette (pTW040) to the commonly used his3Δ200 allele (see http://wiki.yeastgenome.org/index.php/Strains) is inefficient because of the relatively short region of homology on one end. The advantage of targeting to this locus is that the integrated Cre is less prone to be lost by pop-out recombination. When other strategies are used it is recommended to maintain selection for the integrated Cre vector to select against pop-out events. Cre recombinase is expressed constitutively under control of the TDH3 promoter and CYC1 terminator and fused to the human Estrogen Binding Domain (EBD), which makes the nuclear activity of Cre dependent on the hormone β-estradiol (Logie and Stewart 1995). Estradiol releases the EBD from cytosolic heat shock proteins and allows entry of the EBD-Cre chimeric protein into the nucleus for recombination (Logie and Stewart 1995). This allows timed control of the RITE-tag switching. Here we use a derivative of Cre-EBD (Cre-EBD78) that is tightly dependent on the addition of β-estradiol in budding yeast (Lindstrom and Gottschling 2009; Dymond et al. 2011). Background recombination before induction of the tag switch and recombination efficiency after induction can be determined by Southern blot analysis or by plating cells on non-selective media and then replica-plating the colonies to media containing Hygromycin (see Figure 3 and Verzijlbergen et al. 2010). In a typical experiment, the average background recombination is 10% or less, whereas the Cre-induced recombination efficiency is 95% or more (see Figure 3 and Verzijlbergen et al. 2010). The completion of a recombination-induced tag switch in a population of cells generally takes a few hours (Figure 3). This time window should be taken into consideration when RITE is applied to study the dynamics of proteins with a very high turnover rate. Of note, the rate of induced vs. background recombination can vary between strains, tagged genes, cell cycle stages, and experimental conditions. We occasionally encountered strains that showed high background recombination or low levels of induced recombination (data not shown), the reasons of which are unknown. We also found low levels of induced recombination in synthetic media containing monosodium glutamate instead of ammonium sulfate as the nitrogen source (data not shown).
Immunoblot detection of RITE tags
To demonstrate the functionality of the short biochemical epitope tags in the new RITE cassettes, the respective RITE cassettes were PCR amplified and targeted to the histone H3 gene HHT2 (Figure 2B). To avoid interference of nontagged histone H3, the other gene encoding H3 (HHT1) was deleted. We analyzed strains prior to the tag switch as well as strains that had undergone a permanent tag switch. Immunoblot analysis of whole-cell extracts showed that both tags (preswitch shows old Tag 1, postswitch shows new Tag 2) can be detected with the use of tag-specific antibodies (Figure 4, A and B). The old Tag 1 was detected before the switch, whereas the new Tag 2 was detected after the switch. Due to background recombination, low levels of the new Tag 2 were detected before the switch in some of the samples. RITE was also applied to 3-phosphoglycerate kinase (Pgk1), a housekeeping protein. In this case, the RITE cassette contained combinations of short epitope tags and fluorescent tags (pKV015). The old and new tags could be detected on immunoblots before and after the switch, respectively (Figure 4C). In addition, the RITE cassette also harbors an invariant V5 tag, which should be present pre-switch as well as postswitch. Pgk1 containing the invariant V5 tag could be detected in both samples (Figure 4C).
Detection of RITE tags by ChIP
One of the advantages of RITE compared with other methods for measuring protein dynamics is the possibility of applying it to affinity purification. We determined how the various tags in the RITE cassettes perform in ChIP experiments. For this purpose, we tagged histone H3 (HHT2, in the absence of HHT1) and histone variant H2A.Z (HTZ1) with different RITE cassettes and performed ChIP-qPCR experiments on preswitch strains (see Materials and Methods). Three loci were examined (primer sequences are listed in Table 3), representing high (PTC6, RSA4) and low (SPA2) levels of steady-state H2A.Z and similar levels of H3 (Kobor et al. 2004; Albert et al. 2007). Indeed, using the RITE tags, we found that H2A.Z levels relative to H3 levels differed according to the previously shown steady-state levels (Figure 5). Note that although the trends were similar, the relative ChIP efficiency (H2A.Z/H3) was not the same for the different RITE tags (Figure 5). Apparently, the short epitope tags do not work equally well for each protein. Fortunately, the RITE assay is very flexible. The expanded RITE cassette series that we describe here affords the selection of epitope tag pairs that work efficiently for the protein of interest. Furthermore, because the RITE cassettes are modular by design, other tag sequences can be readily incorporated.
Combining RITE with fluorescence microscopy
The addition of fluorescent markers to the RITE technology adds the possibility of spatiotemporal monitoring of proteins of interest (Verzijlbergen et al. 2010; Hotz et al. 2012; Menendez-Benito et al. 2013). We previously described the HA-yEGFP→T7-mRFP and 3xHA-yEGFP→3xT7-mRFP RITE cassettes (see Figure 2A) (Verzijlbergen et al. 2010; Menendez-Benito et al. 2013). An mCherry→GFP RITE-like cassette has been described by the Barral lab (Hotz et al. 2012). Two additional RITE cassettes can be used to switch from a small epitope tag to a larger fluorescent tag (Figure 2A). They can be used for conditional knock-ins when larger tags cause growth defects. As the protein of interest is only fluorescent after the switch, these RITE cassettes are particularly suited for monitoring synthesis and the spatiotemporal behavior of the new protein by microscopy. Figure 6 shows Spc42, a component of the yeast spindle pole body, tagged with these RITE cassettes (Figure 6, A and D). The spindle-pole body could be observed after the tag switch as a bright dot next to the nucleus (Figure 6, B and E), whereas before the tag switch only background signal was observed. Expression of the proteins was confirmed by immunoblot analysis (Figure 6, C and F). Of note, such color switch tags can be combined with microscopy- or flow cytometry-based genetic screens to identify proteins that control protein or organelle dynamics (Hotz et al. 2012).
Detecting protein dynamics
RITE enables the following of protein dynamics under many physiological conditions. Here, we show the application of one of the new RITE cassettes, which switches from V5 to HA-6xHis and was applied to histone H3 (HHT2, in the absence of HHT1) to measure chromatin protein dynamics (Figure 7A). Cells were arrested by starvation and a preswitch sample was taken before inducing Cre recombinase (Figure 7B). After 16 hr of recombination, a postswitch sample was taken before the cells were released in fresh media. Two additional samples were taken during the release, at 2 hr, before cell division, and at 4 hr, when most of the cells had divided once. During the release, the amount of old Tag 1 (V5) decreased, whereas new Tag 2 (HA-6xHis) increased, as expected (Figure 7C). In the pre- and postswitch samples we detected V5- but hardly any HA-tagged protein. The small amount of HA-tagged protein found in the postswitch sample is consistent with previous results showing that in starved cells there is a low level of histone exchange (Verzijlbergen et al. 2010). Using an antibody against the spacer-LoxP peptide sequence, we could detect old Tag 1 and new Tag 2 simultaneously on a single blot due to different mobility on SDS-PAGE gels.
Next, we performed ChIP on these samples and examined occupancy of old and new histone H3 at the PTC6 gene and the SPA2 gene (Table 3). For both genes we detected a decrease in V5-tagged protein (old H3) and an increase in HA-tagged protein (new H3) when switched cells were analyzed four hours after release into fresh media (Figure 7, D and E). The level of histone H3 exchange, i.e., the ratio of new H3 over old H3 (new/old), increased over time (Figure 7F). Because the cells are released into log phase and undergo DNA replication, the exchange measured here was mostly caused by replication-coupled histone deposition, and to a lesser extent by replication-independent histone exchange, the latter of which can vary from gene to gene (Dion et al. 2007; Jamai et al. 2007; Rufiange et al. 2007; Deal et al. 2010; Verzijlbergen et al. 2010).
RITE is a versatile method than can be used to study protein dynamics by different downstream applications on any protein of interest that tolerates C-terminal tags. The GFP tagged yeast library shows the many examples where C-terminal tagging is allowed without significant effects on cell viability or other vital functions (Ghaemmaghami et al. 2003; Huh et al. 2003). The short epitope tags can be used for immunoblot and affinity purification protocols such as ChIP. Thereby, RITE can be combined with proteomics methods, genomics methods, or DNA-based high-throughput screens (Verzijlbergen et al. 2010; De Vos et al. 2011; Radman-Livaja et al. 2011; Verzijlbergen et al. 2011). The fluorescent tags in the RITE cassettes can be applied to measure protein dynamics in single cells by live imaging (Verzijlbergen et al. 2010; Hotz et al. 2012; Menendez-Benito et al. 2013) and further expanded toward high-throughput genetic screening. The suite of RITE cassettes enables a flexible design for many applications. Furthermore, the RITE cassettes are modular by design and can therefore be easily adapted for use in other cell types or organisms. The RITE plasmids and sequence information will be available through EUROSCARF (Frankfurt, http://web.uni-frankfurt.de/fb15/mikro/euroscarf/index.html).
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
We thank Derek Lindstrom for the original Cre-EBD78 construct and members of the van Leeuwen lab for advice. This project was sponsored by the Netherlands Genomics Initiative and by The Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research.
Footnotes
Communicating editor: B. J. Andrews
Literature Cited
- Adams S. R., Tsien R. Y., 2008. Preparation of the membrane-permanent biarsenicals FlAsH-EDT2 and ReAsH-EDT2 for fluorescent labeling of tetracysteine-tagged proteins. Nat. Protoc. 3: 1527–1534 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Albert I., Mavrich T. N., Tomsho L. P., Qi J., Zanton S. J., et al. , 2007. Translational and rotational settings of H2A.Z nucleosomes across the Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome. Nature 446: 572–576 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Brachmann C. B., Davies A., Cost G. J., Caputo E., Li J., et al. , 1998. Designer deletion strains derived from Saccharomyces cerevisiae S288C: a useful set of strains and plasmids for PCR-mediated gene disruption and other applications. Yeast 14: 115–132 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Butko M. T., Yang J., Geng Y., Kim H. J., Jeon N. L., et al. , 2012. Fluorescent and photo-oxidizing TimeSTAMP tags track protein fates in light and electron microscopy. Nat. Neurosci. 15: 1742–1751 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Deal R., Henikoff S., 2010a Capturing the dynamic epigenome. Genome Biol. 11: 218. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Deal R. B., Henikoff S., 2010b Catching a glimpse of nucleosome dynamics. Cell Cycle 9: 3389–3390 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Deal R., Henikoff J., Henikoff S., 2010. Genome-wide kinetics of nucleosome turnover determined by metabolic labeling of histones. Science 328: 1161–1164 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- De Vos D., Frederiks F., Terweij M., van Welsem T., Verzijlbergen K. F., et al. , 2011. Progressive methylation of ageing histones by Dot1 functions as a timer. EMBO Rep. 12: 956–962 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dion M. F., Kaplan T., Kim M., Buratowski S., Friedman N., et al. , 2007. Dynamics of replication-independent histone turnover in budding yeast. Science 315: 1405–1408 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dymond J. S., Richardson S. M., Coombes C. E., Babatz T., Muller H., et al. , 2011. Synthetic chromosome arms function in yeast and generate phenotypic diversity by design. Nature 477: 471–476 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ejlassi-Lassallette A., Mocquard E., Arnaud M. C., Thiriet C., 2011. H4 replication-dependent diacetylation and Hat1 promote S-phase chromatin assembly in vivo. Mol. Biol. Cell 22: 245–255 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ghaemmaghami S., Huh W. K., Bower K., Howson R. W., Belle A., et al. , 2003. Global analysis of protein expression in yeast. Nature 425: 737–741 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gietz R. D., Schiestl R. H., 2007. High-efficiency yeast transformation using the LiAc/SS carrier DNA/PEG method. Nat. Protoc. 2: 31–34 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hager G., McNally J., Misteli T., 2009. Transcription dynamics. Mol. Cell 35: 741–753 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hinkson I., Elias J., 2011. The dynamic state of protein turnover: it’s about time. Trends Cell Biol. 21: 292–303 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hotz M., Leisner C., Chen D., Manatschal C., Wegleiter T., et al. , 2012. Spindle pole bodies exploit the mitotic exit network in metaphase to drive their age-dependent segregation. Cell 148: 958–972 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Huh W. K., Falvo J. V., Gerke L. C., Carroll A. S., Howson R. W., et al. , 2003. Global analysis of protein localization in budding yeast. Nature 425: 686–691 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jamai A., Imoberdorf R. M., Strubin M., 2007. Continuous histone H2B and transcription-dependent histone H3 exchange in yeast cells outside of replication. Mol. Cell 25: 345–355 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jansen L. E. T., Black B. E., Foltz D. R., Cleveland D. W., 2007. Propagation of centromeric chromatin requires exit from mitosis. J. Cell Biol. 176: 795–805 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kim H. J., Seol J. H., Han J. W., Youn H. D., Cho E. J., 2007. Histone chaperones regulate histone exchange during transcription. EMBO J. 26: 4467–4474 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kobor M. S., Venkatasubrahmanyam S., Meneghini M. D., Gin J. W., Jennings J. L., et al. , 2004. A protein complex containing the conserved Swi2/Snf2-related ATPase Swr1p deposits histone variant H2A.Z into euchromatin. PLoS Biol. 2: E131. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Korber P., Luckenbach T., Blaschke D., Horz W., 2004. Evidence for histone eviction in trans upon induction of the yeast PHO5 promoter. Mol. Cell. Biol. 24: 10965–10974 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lin M. Z., Tsien R. Y., 2010. TimeSTAMP tagging of newly synthesized proteins. Curr. Protoc. Protein Sci. 26. Unit 26: 25. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lindstrom D. L., Gottschling D. E., 2009. The mother enrichment program: a genetic system for facile replicative life span analysis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 183: 413–422, 411SI−413SI [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Logie C., Stewart A. F., 1995. Ligand-regulated site-specific recombination. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92: 5940–5944 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Menendez-Benito V., van Deventer S. J., Jimenez-Garcia V., Roy-Luzarraga M., van Leeuwen F., et al. , 2013. Spatiotemporal analysis of organelle and macromolecular complex inheritance. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 110: 175–180 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nelson J., Denisenko O., Bomsztyk K., 2009. The fast chromatin immunoprecipitation method. Methods Mol. Biol. 567: 45–57 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ouellet J., Barral Y., 2012. Organelle segregation during mitosis: lessons from asymmetrically dividing cells. J. Cell Biol. 196: 305–313 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Radman-Livaja M., Verzijlbergen K. F., Weiner A., van Welsem T., Friedman N., et al. , 2011. Patterns and mechanisms of ancestral histone protein inheritance in budding yeast. PLoS Biol. 9: e1001075. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ray-Gallet D., Woolfe A., Vassias I., Pellentz C., Lacoste N., et al. , 2011. Dynamics of histone H3 deposition in vivo reveal a nucleosome gap-filling mechanism for H3.3 to maintain chromatin integrity. Mol. Cell 44: 928–941 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rocha N., Kuijl C., van der Kant R., Janssen L., Houben D., et al. , 2009. Cholesterol sensor ORP1L contacts the ER protein VAP to control Rab7-RILP-p150 Glued and late endosome positioning. J. Cell Biol. 185: 1209–1225 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rufiange A., Jacques P. E., Bhat W., Robert F., Nourani A., 2007. Genome-wide replication-independent histone H3 exchange occurs predominantly at promoters and implicates H3 K56 acetylation and Asf1. Mol. Cell 27: 393–405 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Russel D., Lasker K., Phillips J., Schneidman-Duhovny D., Velazquez-Muriel J. A., et al. , 2009. The structural dynamics of macromolecular processes. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 21: 97–108 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sweet S. M., Li M., Thomas P. M., Durbin K. R., Kelleher N. L., 2010. Kinetics of re-establishing H3K79 methylation marks in global human chromatin. J. Biol. Chem. 285: 32778–32786 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Thiriet C., Hayes J. J., 2005. Replication-independent core histone dynamics at transcriptionally active loci in vivo. Genes Dev. 19: 677–682 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tong A. H., Boone C., 2006. Synthetic genetic array analysis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Methods Mol. Biol. 313: 171–192 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- van Leeuwen F., Gottschling D. E., 2002. Assays for gene silencing in yeast. Methods Enzymol. 350: 165–186 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- van Leeuwen F., Gafken P. R., Gottschling D. E., 2002. Dot1p modulates silencing in yeast by methylation of the nucleosome core. Cell 109: 745–756 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Verzijlbergen K. F., Menendez-Benito V., van Welsem T., van Deventer S. J., Lindstrom D. L., et al. , 2010. Recombination-induced tag exchange to track old and new proteins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 107: 64–68 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Verzijlbergen K. F., van Welsem T., Sie D., Lenstra T. L., Turner D. J., et al. , 2011. A barcode screen for epigenetic regulators reveals a role for the NuB4/HAT-B histone acetyltransferase complex in histone turnover. PLoS Genet. 7: e1002284. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Walsh P. S., Metzger D. A., Higuchi R., 1991. Chelex 100 as a medium for simple extraction of DNA for PCR-based typing from forensic material. Biotechniques 10: 506–513 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zee B. M., Levin R. S., Xu B., LeRoy G., Wingreen N. S., et al. , 2010. In vivo residue-specific histone methylation dynamics. J. Biol. Chem. 285: 3341–3350 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.