Skip to main content
The Neurohospitalist logoLink to The Neurohospitalist
. 2012 Apr;2(2):51–59. doi: 10.1177/1941874412439583

A Neurologist’s Guide to Acute Migraine Therapy in the Emergency Room

Amy A Gelfand 1,2,, Peter J Goadsby 2
PMCID: PMC3737484  NIHMSID: NIHMS432784  PMID: 23936605

Abstract

Migraine is a common reason for visits to the emergency room. Attacks that lead patients to come to the emergency room are often more severe, refractory to home rescue medication, and have been going on for longer. All of these features make these attacks more challenging to treat. The purpose of this article is to review available evidence pertinent to the treatment of acute migraine in adults in the emergency department setting in order to provide neurologists with a rational approach to management. Drug classes and agents reviewed include opioids, dopamine receptor antagonists, triptans, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, corticosteroids, and sodium valproate.

Keywords: headache, primary headache disorders, migraine disorders, quality

Introduction

Migraine is a common reason for emergency room visits.12,30 Multiple factors make the migraineur who presents to the emergency room more challenging to treat than the migraineur who is having a typical attack at home. Before coming to the emergency room, many migraine patients have already tried at least 1 rescue medication without adequate relief.48 Migraine tends to become more difficult to treat as it becomes more prolonged,9,10 because attacks generally become more severe with time. Typical headache duration at emergency room presentation is on the order of 24 to 72 hours in several migraine clinical trials.4,1114

The purpose of this article is to review the available evidence pertinent to the treatment of acute migraine in adults in the emergency department (ED) setting in order to provide neurologists with a rational approach to management (see Table 2). It must be stated at the outset that an ED visit for migraine represents a failure of appropriate outpatient management, and modifications in the patient’s rescue plan need to be made to avoid such visits in the future. While generic drug names will be used in this article, US trade names can be found in Table 1. The core principles to effective treatment are as follows:

Table 2.

Dosing of Medications for Acute Migraine, and Estimation of their Efficacy Based on the Most Methodologically Robust Trial Involving that Agent Performed in an Emergency Room Setting

Class Medication Typical Dose and Route Estimation of Efficacya
Dopamine receptor antagonist
Chlorpromazine 0.1 mg/kg to 25 mg IV or IM
  • 83%18 effective at 1 hour in a small, randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled trial.

  • IV/IM route effective in 67%35-88%41 at 3037 to 6035,41 minutes in small, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials.

  • PR route had a positive outcome in all patients at 2 hours in a small, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial40

Prochlorperazine 10 mg IV or IM; 25 mg PR
Promethazine 25 mg IM (caution with IV administration) NA
Metoclopramide 10 mg IV
  • Effective in 34%35-46%37 at 3037 to 6035 minutes in small, prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials.

Serotonin (5-HT1B/1D) receptor agonists: triptansb
Sumatriptan 6 mg SC
  • Effective in 75%51 at discharge in a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial

  • Mean pain score of the study group decreased significantly at 60 minutes in a small, prospective, randomized double-blind trial52

10 or 20 mg intranasal
Ergot derivatives
Dihydroergotamine 0.5 to 1 mg IM or IV
  • 60% reduction in mean pain rating at 1 hour in a small double-blind, placebo-controlled study using 0.75 mg IV DHE5,8

NSAIDsb
Ketorolac 30 mg IM or IV
  • Approximately 80% decrease in mean pain rating at 2 hours using 60 mg ketorolac IM in a small randomized, double-blind trial7

  • Significant decrease in median pain score for the group (by approximately 57%) at 1 hour using 30 mg IV ketorolac in a small, randomized, double-blind trial.39

Diclofenac 75 mg IM
  • 80% effective at 2 hours in a small, randomized, double-blind study70

Antiepileptics Sodium valproate 300-1200 mg IV
  • Effective in 75% at 50 minutes in a small open-label study,13 with results of a small, randomized double-blind trial less encouraging with only 21% of patients given valproate not requiring additional rescue medication43

Abbreviations: IM, intramuscular; IV, intravenous; NSAIDs, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs; PR, per rectum.

a See the corresponding section in the text for a more complete description of each agent’s efficacy in trials. Due to the heterogeneity in the trials’ primary end points, direct comparison of efficacy between agents within this table is not possible. Only trials performed in an emergency room setting were included in this table.

b Triptans and NSAIDs can be combined for improved efficacy53 in treating acute migraine, though this has not been specifically studied in the emergency department setting.

Table 1.

US Trade Names for Generic Drugs Used in Emergency Room Management of Acute Migraine

Class of Medication Generic Drug Name US Trade Name
Opioids Meperidine (for example) Demerol
Dopamine-receptor antagonists Chlorpromazine Thorazine
Prochlorperazine Compazine
Promethazine Phenergan
Droperidol Inapsine
Haloperidol Haldol
Metoclopramide Reglan
Triptans Sumatriptan Imitrex
Zolmitriptan Zomig
NSAIDs Ketorolac Toradol
Diclofenac Cataflam, Cambria Votarensodi
Corticosteroids Dexamethasone Decadron
Antiepileptics Sodium valproate Depacon
  1. reassurance, assuming one is confident of the diagnosis, that this is migraine and can be controlled;

  2. ensure adequate hydration;

  3. control headache; and

  4. control associated features, particularly nausea, while also considering photophobia and phonophobia through treatment in an appropriate environment.

Potential Treatments for Acute Migraine in the Emergency Room Setting

Fluids

Nausea from migraine can lead to poor oral intake, and vomiting, if present, causes more direct fluid losses. Moreover, diuresis may have been present in the premonitory phase,15 such that fluid balance may have been negative for several hours. It is our general clinical experience that dehydration worsens migraine or at least makes it harder to treat. Hence, one of the first things to assess in a patient with migraine in the emergency room setting is volume status. Unless there is a medical contraindication, liberal fluid replacement is potentially helpful and unlikely to be harmful. In addition, fluids are useful in avoiding the postural hypotension associated with some of the dopamine receptor antagonist medications used to treat migraine, such as chlorpromazine,16 and good hydration provides some degree of renal protection if ketorolac is used.

Notably, many studies of acute migraine therapy required giving intravenous (IV) fluids as part of the treatment protocol prior to administration of the study drug.5,7,8,1721 How much fluid repletion contributes to migraine improvement is not typically assessed, but fluid replacement is arguably an underappreciated aspect of acute migraine therapy.

Opioids

There are numerous disadvantages to the use of opioids in the treatment of migraine, and they typically should not be used as first-line therapy. First, opioids are not as effective in the treatment of acute migraine as other agents, such as dihydroergotamine (DHE),22 ketorolac,22 butyrophenones, and the phenothiazines with more side effects.8,2324 In a study comparing treatment with chlorpromazine and meperidine, chlorpromazine was more effective and patients receiving meperidine were more likely to need rescue medication.8 Opioids may also render acute migraine medications, such as triptans, less effective24 and may impair the effectiveness of migraine preventives.

In addition, opioids have the potential to promote chronic migraine25 and probably medication overuse headache.26,27 Using opioids as first-line therapy for acute migraine in the ED is associated with an increased risk of relapse and need for return to the ED.28 Migraine patients with opioid dependence have more disability, depression, and anxiety issues when compared to those who had not with similar headache frequencies.29

Despite these many disadvantages, opioids are still frequently given as first-line treatment of acute migraine in the emergency room,2,28 and this use is not at all understood.30 Education about the proper role of opioids in headache management is an important component of neurological consultation in this setting.

It may be reasonable to consider opioid use for pregnant patients who are refractory to first-line migraine therapies such as fluids and antiemetics, as nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) can only be used in certain trimesters of pregnancy, ergots are contraindicated, and in general triptans are contraindicated.31,104

Antidopaminergic Agents

The role of dopamine in migraine pathophysiology is incompletely understood.32 Hypersensitivity to dopamine in migraineurs is thought to play a role in premonitory migraine symptoms such as yawning, nausea, and vomiting, but dopamine also appears to have a beneficial effect in potentially limiting pain perception by inhibiting nociceptive transmission from the trigeminocervical complex up to the thalamus.32 Whatever be the mechanism, several dopamine receptor antagonists have proven to be useful in acute migraine headache.

There are 2 major subclasses of antidopaminergic agents used in acute migraine therapy: phenothiazines and butyrophenones. Metoclopromide is in its own third class. The antiemetic properties of these medications make them quite useful in treating the nausea that frequently accompanies migraine headache.33 American Academy of Neurology clinical practice guidelines recommend treating significant nausea with antiemetics in patients with migraine, even in the absence of vomiting.34

Importantly, in addition to antidopaminergic effects, many of these agents have antihistaminic and anticholinergic effects. This leads to drowsiness as a common side effect,35,36 and dopamine receptor antagonists may impair patients’ ability to return to their usual activities immediately following treatment. Phenothiazines and buytrophenones can also prolong the QT interval.

The other major side effect of these medications relates to their antidopaminergic effects, as they can cause abnormal movements such as dystonia or akasthesia.12,37 If these side effects occur, treatment with diphenhydramine is often helpful and pretreatment can also be considered.11,12,20

The evidence for each agent is detailed below. Prochlorperazine and chlorpromazine are overall the best first-line agents of this class.

Phenothiazines (Chlorpromazine, Prochlorperazine, and Promethazine)

Chlorpromazine

There are placebo-controlled18,38 and head-to-head trials5,7,8,17,19 supporting the efficacy of chlorpromazine in acute migraine. In the emergency room setting, it is typically administered either IV5,1719 or via intramuscular (IM) injection,38 but oral formulations are also available. Effective doses in migraine trials have ranged from 0.1 mg/kg to 37.5 mg IV.5,7,1819 In early studies, chlorpromazine was associated with postural hypotension, however, pretreatment with fluids was subsequently shown to decrease the likelihood of this side effect.8,16,18

Efficacy of chlorpromazine generally exceeds 80%,17,19 and it outperforms meperidine,8 DHE,17 and lidocaine.17 It appears to have comparable efficacy to injectable sumatriptan.19

Prochlorperazine

There are multiple studies supporting the use of prochlorperazine in acute migraine,4,20,3537,39 including placebo-controlled trials.37,40,41 It has also been used in children with migraine.42 Typical adult dosing is 10 mg given IV or IM.4,20,35,39 It can also be given as a 25 mg suppository.40 Prochlorperazine appears to be superior to magnesium,4 sodium valproate,43 ketorolac,39 metoclopramide,35,37 octreotide,36 and perhaps subcutaneous sumatriptan.20 In a small randomized trial, 90% of patients receiving 10 mg IV prochlorperazine had complete or partial relief.4 In another study, three quarters of patients treated with prochlorperazine had complete nausea relief.35

Promethazine

Promethazine has not been independently studied for migraine headache efficacy but has been used as an adjunct therapy for its antiemetic properties.2,44,45 The preferred route of administration is IM injection.44,45 If IV administration is necessary, promethazine should be given slowly through a well-functioning catheter with close monitoring for pain at the infusion site, as extravasation can result in severe soft tissue injury.46 The typical dose is 25 mg.44,45

Butyrophenones (Droperidol and Haloperidol)

Based on 2 randomized studies, droperidol may be somewhat more effective than prochlorperazine for the treatment of acute migraine6,47; however, it is a more difficult medication to use and is not typically used as a first-line migraine therapy. In 2001, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued a black box warning regarding the risk of QT prolongation and torsade de pointes in patients treated with droperidol, hence this medication should only be used if other alternatives were ineffective or contraindicated, and only after obtaining an electrocardiograph (ECG).47 Droperidol can be given either IV or IM at doses of 2.5 to 5 mg.6 One placebo-controlled study showed haloperidol to be effective in the treatment of acute migraine, however, troublesome akathisia was a common side effect.48 Haloperidol can also prolong the QT interval.

Metoclopramide

In addition to having antidopaminergic effects, metoclopramide is also a serotonin receptor (5HT3) antagonist.5 Typical metoclopramide dosing for migraine is 10 mg administered IVor IM.35,37,49 Metoclopramide is probably not as effective as prochlorperazine,35,37 although 1 study demonstrated similar efficacy when a higher dose of 20 mg is used.12 Drowsiness, dizziness, and akathisia are potential side effects.5,12

Triptans

The triptans are migraine-specific therapies that act as serotonin 5HT1B/1D receptor agonists. There are currently 7 different triptans available for use in clinical practice. Oral triptans would typically be used as first line for many patients at home, although some use nasal sprays or even subcutaneous sumatriptan.

For patients in an emergency room or urgent care setting, subcutaneous sumatriptan is best studied,19,20,50,51 with a placebo-controlled trial performed in this setting.51 The dose is 6 mg by subcutaneous injection. When used for headaches whose duration has not exceeded 6 hours, the efficacy is as high as 91%.50 In a more typical emergency room use, the efficacy is 75%.51 Use of the injectable formulation has the advantage of potentially avoiding IV insertion.

Nasal spray triptan formulations are useful options for patients with significant nausea or vomiting. Intranasal sumatriptan has been studied in the emergency room setting.52 Nasal spray zolmitriptan has very rapid onset and excellent absorption across the nasal mucosa.105 Generally speaking, the combination of a triptan with an NSAID is more effective for migraine headache than either agent alone.53

While the development of triptans represented a major step forward in acute migraine therapy, they are not a cure-all. Only one third of patients are pain free at 2 hours after using a triptan54 and a quarter of migraineurs do not respond to triptans at all.55 Some patients will have already used a triptan at home before coming to the emergency room for refractory migraine. For those patients who do not respond to triptans or in whom they are contraindicated, NSAIDs50 and phenothiazines have compared favorably with injectable sumatriptan19,20 and represent excellent alternatives.

Contraindications to triptan administration include cardiovascular disease, uncontrolled hypertension, and, in general, pregnancy. Concurrent use of a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) or serotonin/norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor (SNRI) is not a contraindication to triptan administration, and this issue has been recently reviewed in an American Headache Society position paper. Given that triptans do not interact with the 5HT2 receptor, it does not seem plausible pharmacologically that their use could precipitate serotonin syndrome in someone taking an SSRI or SNRI, and empirically there are few, if any, cases that fulfill the standard criteria.56

Dihydroergotamine

The mechanism of action of DHE in migraine includes inhibition of second-order neurons in the trigeminocervical complex.17,57 There is a placebo-controlled trial that supports the use of IV DHE in the emergency room setting for acute migraine,58 with a mean reduction in pain of 60% at 1 hour following a single 0.75 mg dose. There are multiple positive placebo-controlled trials for nasal DHE for acute migraine, and this formulation can be used in the emergency room setting. A large open-label trial of IM DHE showed significant pain relief at 1 hour in 72% after a single 1 mg dose.59 A placebo-controlled study for orally inhaled DHE was recently published,60 although this formulation is not yet clinically available.

A typical effective dose for an emergency room or urgent care setting would be 0.5 mg or 1 mg17,44,59DHE either IV or IM. This can be repeated to a maximum of 3 mg in 24 hours. While DHE is better tolerated than other ergot alkaloids,62 nausea is still a common side effect with IV administration and pretreatment with an antiemetic is needed.63 Starting with the lower dose may be prudent, particularly in smaller patients. When DHE is administered IM or as nasal spray, nausea is not as prominent and pretreatment is not always necessary.59,63

Serious adverse effects from DHE are quite rare.64 Dihydroergotamine has been used safely with repeated dosing in the inpatients as a therapeutic strategy for chronic migraine.64,65 Contraindications to DHE include pregnancy and a history of cerebrovascular disease or uncontrolled hypertension.17

Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs have a substantial placebo-controlled evidence base to support their use in the treatment of acute migraine.34,50,66 Patients will have frequently used oral over-the-counter NSAIDs at home before presenting to the emergency room. However, several parenteral options are available for acute migraine in the emergency room setting.

While not easily available in the United States, IV acetylsalicyclic acid is highly effective in the treatment of acute migraine and better tolerated than subcutaneous sumatriptan.50 It is very effective for migraine triggered during admissions for medication withdrawal and extremely well tolerated in thoughtfully selected cases.68

Ketorolac is the parenteral NSAID most frequently used in US emergency rooms for treatment of acute migraine,2 and there are prospective, randomized studies to support its use.7,39 Efficacy can be approximately 80% when using the higher dose of 60 mg IV.7 However, in some European countries the 60 mg dose was taken off the market because of an association with acute renal failure.69 Ketorolac 30 mg IV is inferior to prochlorperazine 10 mg IV.39

Diclofenac 75 mg IM is another option that has been used with good efficacy in the emergency room.70

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are generally safe and well tolerated. They can be combined with triptans for improved efficacy.53 Active peptic ulcer disease would be a contraindication to their use, and caution should be used in patients with renal insufficiency and severe asthma. In pregnant women, NSAIDs are contraindicated in certain trimesters.

Sodium Valproate

Sodium valproate is an established agent for migraine prophylaxis71 and appears effective in aborting glyceryl trinitrate–induced migraine attacks.72 Although the mechanism of action of valproate in migraine is not certain, valproate potentiates gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA)73,74 and decreases the activation in the trigeminal nucleus.75

As of yet there are no placebo-controlled studies of IV sodium valproate for the acute treatment of migraine. While open-label studies give some support for its efficacy,13,14,76,77 prospective, randomized, double-blind comparison studies are somewhat less encouraging.43,67 For an acute migraine indication, sodium valproate is typically given as a single IV load, with the dosage used ranging from 300 to 1200 mg,13,14,43,67,76,77 with no clear dose-related pattern in improved response.

A urine pregnancy test is recommended before giving this medication to a woman of child-bearing age, given valproate’s teratogenicity. Contraindications to sodium valproate use include liver disease and urea cycle defects.78

Corticosteroids

The use of a short course of oral corticosteroids for status migrainosus (migraine lasting longer than 72 hours33) has never been studied, although it is sometimes empirically used.22 If considering such a strategy, it is important to remember that in rare instances short courses of higher dose corticosteroids have been associated with avascular necrosis of bone.7982

Similarly, corticosteroids do not appear to be useful for the acute treatment of migraine. While early open-label studies suggested some benefit,21,83 multiple randomized placebo-controlled studies have failed to demonstrate an effect for corticosteroids in treating acute migraine in the ED.8486,90,106

Two meta-analyses of a total of 8 studies examined the effect of a single dose of corticosteroids at ED discharge on headache recurrence at 24 to 72 hours.87,88 Patients received “standard migraine therapy” and then were randomized at discharge to receive either placebo or dexamethasone. All but one of the studies used a parenteral dose of dexamethasone; 1 study used oral dexamethasone. Both meta-analyses concluded that dexamethasone decreases the risk of headache recurrence after ED discharge, with the estimated number needed to treat being 9 or 10. The meta-analysis results were predominantly driven by 1 trial.89 It is important to note that only 2 of the studies gave a “standard” acute migraine therapy to their patients before randomization (chlorpromazine or metoclopramide)86,90; the others utilized polypharmacy, with high rates of opioid use, which predispose to headache recurrence.

The potential benefit of using corticosteroids in this fashion has to be balanced against the risks of repeated exposures to corticosteroids. Migraine is an episodic disorder and unfortunately patients may present repeatedly to the emergency room. In 1 study, 10% of the participants came to the emergency room once a week or more for migraine; and in a pediatric study, 11.2% came back within a month.85,91 While dexamethasone is purported to improve the recurrence rate at 24 hours, it is not going to prevent the next episode of migraine, which could happen in a week. Patients who come repeatedly to the emergency room could accumulate significant exposure to corticosteroids if the practice of giving dexamethasone at ED discharge becomes widespread. Even if the number needed to treat is 9, this would still mean 8 patients would be receiving immunosuppressant therapy unnecessarily.

Alternate strategies for optimal management at ED discharge are needed, and several options are recommended below.

Strategies at ED Discharge

If the patient is pain free, no further therapy is needed. It is important to provide the patient with the tools they need to successfully treat their next headache at home, regardless of whether it is a recurrence in the next 24 hours or their next episode. Oral sumatriptan 100 mg is effective for acute migraine in general92 and is also quite useful for recurrent headache within 24 hours.51,9395 Naproxen 500 mg is equally useful for recurrent headache,93 and adding naproxen to sumatriptan is even more effective at preventing recurrence.96 If nausea is a significant component of the patient’s migraine, an oral or suppository formulation of dopamine receptor antagonist should be prescribed.

If the patient still has some residual head pain, providing reassurance that they are heading in the right direction and encouraging them to sleep when they get home can be helpful. Admitting for acute migraine has many downsides, and even repeated dosing of DHE as an inpatient is no guarantee of rapid success in ending the headache.97 It would be preferable to give an additional dose of DHE or dopamine receptor antagonist in the emergency room, if needed, instead of admitting the patient. Hospital admission is likely to prove disruptive to the patient’s sleep pattern, and in a shared room setting likely to involve significant ambient noise and light that can exacerbate photophobia and phonophobia.

Starting the patient on a standing course of naproxen on an outpatient basis may be beneficial in helping to quiet the headache further. In addition to having efficacy as an acute migraine medication, naproxen has also been studied in 5 placebo-controlled trials as a migraine preventive, with positive results in 3 and a positive trend in the others.98102 Dosages used in these studies were 500 to 550 mg twice a day ([BID] 250 mg BID for the adolescent study98) for 6 to 15 weeks. For gastric protection a proton pump inhibitor can be added. The likelihood of NSAIDs causing medication overuse headache is small or nonexistent,27 and moderate usage is actually protective against conversion to chronic migraine.103

Summary

Migraine is a common reason for emergency room visits. Attacks that lead to emergency room presentation are likely to be longer in duration and relatively medically refractory. For those with relatively mild head pain and no nausea, oral therapy with a triptan or NSAID is a good starting point. If pain is more severe, or there is nausea, liberal IV fluid replacement should be provided. Dopamine receptor antagonists, specifically chlorpromazine and prochlorperazine, are first-line agents, particularly if there is nausea. If further treatment is needed, the evidence base is strongest for DHE or subcutaneous sumatriptan, followed by parenteral NSAIDs (with IV aspirin having the strongest evidence but difficult to access in the United States). Intravenous sodium valproate can be considered but has a weaker evidence base and should be used with caution in women of child-bearing age. Opioids should generally be avoided and are certainly not the first-line agents. Corticosteroids do not have an established role in the treatment of acute migraine. Follow-up with a neurologist or headache specialist is important for any migraineur who has presented to an emergency room in order to ensure that they have an adequate home rescue plan. Oral sumatriptan and naproxen are well-proven therapies for headache recurrence and acute attacks alike, particularly when used in combination.

Footnotes

The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

AAG receives grant support from NIH/NINDS, and has received honoraria from Journal Watch Neurology. PJG is on the boards of Allergan, Colucid, MAP pharmaceuticals, Merck, Sharpe and Dohme, eNeura, Neuroaxon, Autonomic Technologies Inc, Boston Scientific, Eli-Lilly, Medtronic, Linde gases, and BristolMyerSquibb. He has consulted for Pfizer and has been compensated for expert legal testimony. He has grant support from GlaxoSmithKline, MAP, MSD, eNeura, and Amgen. He has received honoraria for speaking from MSD, Pfizer, Allergan, and Mennarini, and payment for developing educational materials for the American Headache Society.

References

  • 1. Friedman BW, Hochberg ML, Esses D, et al. Applying the international classification of headache disorders to the emergency department: an assessment of reproducibility and the frequency with which a unique diagnosis can be assigned to every acute headache presentation. Ann Emerg Med. 2007;49(4):409–419, 419, e401–409 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Vinson DR. Treatment patterns of isolated benign headache in US emergency departments. Ann Emerg Med. 2002;39(3):215–222 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Rothrock JF. Images from headache: a costly attack of migraine. Headache. 2008;48(6):951. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Ginder S, Oatman B, Pollack M. A prospective study of i.v. magnesium and i.v. prochlorperazine in the treatment of headaches. J Emerg Med. 2000;18(3):311–315 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Cameron JD, Lane PL, Speechley M. Intravenous chlorpromazine vs intravenous metoclopramide in acute migraine headache. Acad Emerg Med. 1995;2(7):597–602 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Miner JR, Fish SJ, Smith SW, Biros MH. Droperidol vs. prochlorperazine for benign headaches in the emergency department. Acad Emerg Med. 2001;8(9):873–879 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Shrestha M, Singh R, Moreden J, Hayes JE. Ketorolac vs chlorpromazine in the treatment of acute migraine without aura. A prospective, randomized, double-blind trial. Arch Intern Med. 1996;156(15):1725–1728 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Lane PL, McLellan BA, Baggoley CJ. Comparative efficacy of chlorpromazine and meperidine with dimenhydrinate in migraine headache. Ann Emerg Med. 1989;18(4):360–365 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Goadsby PJ. The ‘Act when Mild' (AwM) study: a step forward in our understanding of early treatment in acute migraine. Cephalalgia. 2008;28(suppl 2):36–41 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Goadsby PJ, Zanchin G, Geraud G, et al. Early vs. non-early intervention in acute migraine-'Act when Mild (AwM)'. A double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of almotriptan. Cephalalgia. 2008;28(4):383–391 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Trottier ED, Bailey B, Lucas N, Lortie A. Prochlorperazine in children with migraine: a look at its effectiveness and rate of akathisia. Am J Emerg Med. 22011 Feb 4 (Epub ahead of print) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Friedman BW, Esses D, Solorzano C, et al. A randomized controlled trial of prochlorperazine versus metoclopramide for treatment of acute migraine. Ann Emerg Med. 2008;52(4):399–406 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Shahien R, Saleh SA, Bowirrat A. Intravenous sodium valproate aborts migraine headaches rapidly. Acta Neurol Scand. 2011;123(4):257–265 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Edwards KR, Norton J, Behnke M. Comparison of intravenous valproate versus intramuscular dihydroergotamine and metoclopramide for acute treatment of migraine headache. Headache. 2001;41(10):976–980 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Giffin NJ, Ruggiero L, Lipton RB, et al. Premonitory symptoms in migraine: an electronic diary study. Neurology. 2003;60(6):935–940 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Loga P, Lewis D. Compazine in migraine. Emergency Medicine Journal (BMJ). 2007;24(4):297–298 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Bell R, Montoya D, Shuaib A, Lee MA. A comparative trial of three agents in the treatment of acute migraine headache. Ann Emerg Med. 1990;19(10):1079–1082 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Bigal ME, Bordini CA, Speciali JG. Intravenous chlorpromazine in the emergency department treatment of migraines: a randomized controlled trial. J Emerg Med. 2002;23(2):141–148 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Kelly AM, Ardagh M, Curry C, D'Antonio J, Zebic S. Intravenous chlorpromazine versus intramuscular sumatriptan for acute migraine. J Accid Emerg Med. 1997;14(4):209–211 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Kostic MA, Gutierrez FJ, Rieg TS, Moore TS, Gendron RT. A prospective, randomized trial of intravenous prochlorperazine versus subcutaneous sumatriptan in acute migraine therapy in the emergency department. Ann Emerg Med. 2010;56(1):1–6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Saadah HA. Abortive migraine therapy in the office with dexamethasone and prochlorperazine. Headache. 1994;34(6):366–370 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Rozen TD. Acute therapy for migraine headaches. Semin Neurol. 2006;26(2):181–187 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Leong LB, Kelly AM. Are butyrophenones effective for the treatment of primary headache in the emergency department? CJEM. 2011;13(2):96–104 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Ho TW, Rodgers A, Bigal ME. Impact of recent prior opioid use on rizatriptan efficacy. A post hoc pooled analysis. Headache. 2009;49(3):395–403 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Bigal ME, Rapoport AM, Lipton RB, Tepper SJ, Sheftell FD. Assessment of migraine disability using the migraine disability assessment (MIDAS) questionnaire: a comparison of chronic migraine with episodic migraine. Headache. 2003;43(4):336–342 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Silberstein SD, Olesen J, Bousser MG, et al. The international classification of headache disorders, 2nd Edition (ICHD-II)—revision of criteria for 8.2 Medication-overuse headache. Cephalalgia. 2005;25(6):460–465 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Dodick D, Freitag F. Evidence-based understanding of medication-overuse headache: clinical implications. Headache. 2006;46(suppl 4):S202–S211 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Colman I, Rothney A, Wright SC, Zilkalns B, Rowe BH. Use of narcotic analgesics in the emergency department treatment of migraine headache. Neurology. 2004;62(10):1695–1700 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Buse DC, Pearlman SH, Serrano D, Ng-Mak DS, Reed ML, Lipton RB. Rates of opioid use and dependence by sociodemographics, medical and psychiatric comorbidities, and headache-related disability among persons with Episodic Migraine (EM) in the US population: results of the American Migraine Prevalence and Prevention (AMPP) study. Headache. 2011;51:48 [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Evans RW, Friedman BW. Headache in the emergency department. Headache. 2011;51(8):1276–1278 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Goadsby PJ, Goldberg J, Silberstein SD. Migraine in pregnancy. BMJ. 2008;336(7659):1502–1504 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Charbit AR, Akerman S, Goadsby PJ. Dopamine: what's new in migraine? Curr Opin Neurol. 2010;23(3):275–281 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Headache Classification Subcommittee of the International Headache Society The international classification of headache disorders: 2nd edition. Cephalalgia. 2004;24(suppl 1):9–160 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Silberstein SD. Practice parameter: evidence-based guidelines for migraine headache (an evidence-based review): report of the quality standards subcommittee of the American academy of neurology. Neurology. 2000;55(6):754–762 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Jones J, Pack S, Chun E. Intramuscular prochlorperazine versus metoclopramide as single-agent therapy for the treatment of acute migraine headache. Am J Emerg Med. 1996;14(3):262–264 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Miller MA, Levsky ME, Enslow W, Rosin A. Randomized evaluation of octreotide vs prochlorperazine for ED treatment of migraine headache. Am J Emerg Med. 2009;27(2):160–164 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Coppola M, Yealy DM, Leibold RA. Randomized, placebo-controlled evaluation of prochlorperazine versus metoclopramide for emergency department treatment of migraine headache. Ann Emerg Med. 1995;26(5):541–546 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. McEwen JI, O'Connor HM, Dinsdale HB. Treatment of migraine with intramuscular chlorpromazine. Ann Emerg Med. 1987;16(7):758–763 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Seim MB, March JA, Dunn KA. Intravenous ketorolac vs intravenous prochlorperazine for the treatment of migraine headaches. Acad Emerg Med. 1998;5(6):573–576 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Jones EB, Gonzalez ER, Boggs JG, Grillo JA, Elswick RK., Jr Safety and efficacy of rectal prochlorperazine for the treatment of migraine in the emergency department. Ann Emerg Med. 1994;24(2):237–241 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Jones J, Sklar D, Dougherty J, White W. Randomized double-blind trial of intravenous prochlorperazine for the treatment of acute headache. JAMA. 1989;261(8):1174–1176 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Trottier ED, Bailey B, Dauphin-Pierre S, Gravel J. Clinical outcomes of children treated with intravenous prochlorperazine for migraine in a pediatric emergency department. J Emerg Med. 2010;39(2):166–173 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Tanen DA, Miller S, French T, Riffenburgh RH. Intravenous sodium valproate versus prochlorperazine for the emergency department treatment of acute migraine headaches: a prospective, randomized, double-blind trial. Ann Emerg Med. 2003;41(6):847–853 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Scherl ER, Wilson JF. Comparison of dihydroergotamine with metoclopramide versus meperidine with promethazine in the treatment of acute migraine. Headache. 1995;35(5):256–259 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Davis CP, Torre PR, Williams C, et al. Ketorolac versus meperidine-plus-promethazine treatment of migraine headache: evaluations by patients. Am J Emerg Med. 1995;13(2):146–150 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Information FPDS, author. http://www.fda.gov/Drugs/DrugSafetyPostmarketDrugSafetyInformationforPatientsandProviders/DrugSafetyInformationforHeathcareProfessionals/ucm182169.htm
  • 47. Weaver CS, Jones JB, Chisholm CD, et al. Droperidol vs prochlorperazine for the treatment of acute headache. J Emerg Med. 2004;26(2):145–150 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Honkaniemi J, Liimatainen S, Rainesalo S, Sulavuori S. Haloperidol in the acute treatment of migraine: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Headache. 2006;46(5):781–787 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Salazar G, Fragoso M, Vergez L, Sergio P, Cuello D. Metoclopramide as an analgesic in severe migraine attacks: an open, single-blind, parallel control study. Recent Pat CNS Drug Discov. 2011;6(2):141–145 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Diener HC. Efficacy and safety of intravenous acetylsalicylic acid lysinate compared to subcutaneous sumatriptan and parenteral placebo in the acute treatment of migraine. A double-blind, double-dummy, randomized, multicenter, parallel group study. The ASASUMAMIG study group. Cephalalgia. 1999;19(6):581–588; discussion 542 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Akpunonu BE, Mutgi AB, Federman DJ, et al. Subcutaneous sumatriptan for treatment of acute migraine in patients admitted to the emergency department: a multicenter study. Ann Emerg Med. 1995;25(4):464–469 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Meredith JT, Wait S, Brewer KL. A prospective double-blind study of nasal sumatriptan versus IV ketorolac in migraine. Am J Emerg Med. 2003;21(3):173–175 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Brandes JL, Kudrow D, Stark SR, et al. Sumatriptan-naproxen for acute treatment of migraine: a randomized trial. JAMA. 2007;297(13):1443–1454 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54. Ferrari MD, Roon KI, Lipton RB, Goadsby PJ. Oral triptans (serotonin 5-HT(1B/1D) agonists) in acute migraine treatment: a meta-analysis of 53 trials. Lancet. 2001;358(9294):1668–1675 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55. Diener HC, Limmroth V. Advances in pharmacological treatment of migraine. Expert Opin Investig Drugs. 2001;10(10):1831–1845 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56. Evans RW, Tepper SJ, Shapiro RE, Sun-Edelstein C, Tietjen GE. The FDA alert on serotonin syndrome with use of triptans combined with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors or selective serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors: American headache society position paper. Headache. 2010;50(6):1089–1099 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57. Hoskin KL, Kaube H, Goadsby PJ. Central activation of the trigeminovascular pathway in the cat is inhibited by dihydroergotamine. A c-Fos and electrophysiological study. Brain. 1996;119 (pt 1):249–256 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58. Callaham M, Raskin N. A controlled study of dihydroergotamine in the treatment of acute migraine headache. Headache. 1986;26(4):168–171 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59. Winner P, Dalessio D, Mathew N, et al. Office-based treatment of acute migraine with dihydroergotamine mesylate. Headache. 1993;33(9):471–475 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60. Tepper SJ, Kori SH, Goadsby PJ, et al. MAP0004, Orally inhaled dihydroergotamine for acute treatment of migraine: efficacy of early and late treatments. Mayo Clin Proc. 2011;86(10):948–955 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61. Becker WJ, Riess CM, Hoag J. Effectiveness of subcutaneous dihydroergotamine by home injection for migraine. Headache. 1996;36(3):144–148 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62. Monteith TS, Goadsby PJ. Acute migraine therapy: new drugs and new approaches. Curr Treat Options Neurol. 2011;13(1):1–14 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63. Saper JR, Silberstein S. Pharmacology of dihydroergotamine and evidence for efficacy and safety in migraine. Headache. 2006;46(suppl 4):S171–S181 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64. Morren JA, Galvez-Jimenez N. Where is dihydroergotamine mesylate in the changing landscape of migraine therapy? Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2010;11(18):3085–3093 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65. Nagy A, Gandi S, Bhola R, Goadsby PJ. Intravenous dihydroergotamine (DHE) for inpatient management of refractory primary headaches. Neurology. 2011;77(20):1827–1832 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Gray RN, McCrory DC, Eberlein K, Westman EC, Hasselblad V.1999.
  • 67. Leniger T, Pageler L, Stude P, Diener HC, Limmroth V. Comparison of intravenous valproate with intravenous lysine-acetylsalicylic acid in acute migraine attacks. Headache. 2005;45(1):42–46 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68. Weatherall MW, Telzerow AJ, Cittadini E, Kaube H, Goadsby PJ. Intravenous aspirin (lysine acetylsalicylate) in the inpatient management of headache. Neurology. 2010;75(12):1098–1103 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69. Arora S, Wagner JG, Herbert M. Myth: parenteral ketorolac provides more effective analgesia than oral ibuprofen. CJEM. 2007;9(1):30–32 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70. Engindeniz Z, Demircan C, Karli N, et al. Intramuscular tramadol vs. diclofenac sodium for the treatment of acute migraine attacks in emergency department: a prospective, randomised, double-blind study. J Headache Pain. 2005;6(3):143–148 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71. Freitag FG, Collins SD, Carlson HA, et al. A randomized trial of divalproex sodium extended-release tablets in migraine prophylaxis. Neurology. 2002;58(11):1652–1659 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72. Thomaides T, Karapanayiotides T, Kerezoudi E, et al. Intravenous valproate aborts glyceryl trinitrate-induced migraine attacks: a clinical and quantitative EEG study. Cephalalgia. 2008;28(3):250–256 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73. Loscher W, Vetter M. In vivo effects of aminooxyacetic acid and valproic acid on nerve terminal (synaptosomal) GABA levels in discrete brain areas of the rat. Correlation to pharmacological activities. Biochem Pharmacol. 1985;34(10):1747–1756 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74. Cutrer FM, Moskowitz MA. Wolff award 1996. The actions of valproate and neurosteroids in a model of trigeminal pain. Headache. 1996;36(10):579–585 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75. Cutrer FM, Limmroth V, Ayata G, Moskowitz MA. Attenuation by valproate of c-fos immunoreactivity in trigeminal nucleus caudalis induced by intracisternal capsaicin. Br J Pharmacol. 1995;116(8):3199–3204 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76. Hering R, Steiner TJ. Sodium valproate for acute migraine attacks. Cephalalgia. 1994;14(4):305–306 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77. Mathew NT, Kailasam J, Meadors L, Chernyschev O, Gentry P. Intravenous valproate sodium (depacon) aborts migraine rapidly: a preliminary report. Headache. 2000;40(9):720–723 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78. Segura-Bruna N, Rodriguez-Campello A, Puente V, Roquer J. Valproate-induced hyperammonemic encephalopathy. Acta Neurol Scand. 2006;114(1):1–7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79. Anderton JM, Helm R. Multiple joint osteonecrosis following short-term steroid therapy. Case report. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1982;64(1):139–141 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80. McCluskey J, Gutteridge DH. Avascular necrosis of bone after high doses of dexamethasone during neurosurgery. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1982;284(6312):333–334 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81. Fast A, Alon M, Weiss S, Zer-Aviv FR. Avascular necrosis of bone following short-term dexamethasone therapy for brain edema. Case report. J Neurosurg. 1984;61(5):983–985 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82. Watkins S, Williams JR. Avascular necrosis of bone after high doses of dexamethasone during neurosurgery. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1982;284(6317):742. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83. Stiller J. Management of acute intractable headaches using i. v. therapy in an office setting. Headache. 1992;32(10):514–515 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84. Rowe BH, Colman I, Edmonds ML, Blitz S, Walker A, Wiens S. Randomized controlled trial of intravenous dexamethasone to prevent relapse in acute migraine headache. Headache. 2008;48(3):333–340 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85. Donaldson D, Sundermann R, Jackson R, Bastani A. Intravenous dexamethasone vs placebo as adjunctive therapy to reduce the recurrence rate of acute migraine headaches: a multicenter, double-blinded, placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial. Am J Emerg Med. 2008;26(2):124–130 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86. Kelly AM, Kerr D, Clooney M. Impact of oral dexamethasone versus placebo after ED treatment of migraine with phenothiazines on the rate of recurrent headache: a randomised controlled trial. Emerg Med J. 2008;25(1):26–29 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87. Singh A, Alter HJ, Zaia B. Does the addition of dexamethasone to standard therapy for acute migraine headache decrease the incidence of recurrent headache for patients treated in the emergency department? A meta-analysis and systematic review of the literature. Acad Emerg Med. 2008;15(12):1223–1233 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88. Colman I, Friedman BW, Brown MD, et al. Parenteral dexamethasone for acute severe migraine headache: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials for preventing recurrence. BMJ. 2008;336(7657):1359–1361 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89. Innes GD, Macphail I, Dillon EC, Metcalfe C, Gao M. Dexamethasone prevents relapse after emergency department treatment of acute migraine: a randomized clinical trial. CJEM. 1999;1(1):26–33 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90. Friedman BW, Greenwald P, Bania TC, et al. Randomized trial of IV dexamethasone for acute migraine in the emergency department. Neurology. 2007;69(22):2038–2044 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91. Legault G, Eisman H, Shevell MI. Treatment of pediatric status migrainosus: can we prevent the “bounce back”? J Child Neurol. 2011;26(8):949–955 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92. Nappi G, Sicuteri F, Byrne M, Roncolato M, Zerbini O. Oral sumatriptan compared with placebo in the acute treatment of migraine. J Neurol. 1994;241(3):138–144 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93. Friedman BW, Solorzano C, Esses D, et al. Treating headache recurrence after emergency department discharge: a randomized controlled trial of naproxen versus sumatriptan. Ann Emerg Med. 2010;56(1):7–17 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94. Cady RK, Rubino J, Crummett D, Littlejohn TW,, 3rd Oral sumatriptan in the treatment of recurrent headache. Arch Fam Med. 1994;3(9):766–772 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95. Ferrari MD, James MH, Bates D, et al. Oral sumatriptan: effect of a second dose, and incidence and treatment of headache recurrences. Cephalalgia. 1994;14(5):330–338 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96. Krymchantowski AV. Naproxen sodium decreases migraine recurrence when administered with sumatriptan. Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2000;58(2B):428–430 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97. Kabbouche MA, Powers SW, Segers A, et al. Inpatient treatment of status migraine with dihydroergotamine in children and adolescents. Headache. 2009;49(1):106–109 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98. Lewis D, Middlebrook MT, Deline C. Naproxen sodium for chemophrophylaxis of adolescent migraine. Ann Neurol. 1994;36:542 [Google Scholar]
  • 99. Bellavance AJ, Meloche JP. A comparative study of naproxen sodium, pizotyline and placebo in migraine prophylaxis. Headache. 1990;30(11):710–715 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100. Welch KM, Ellis DJ, Keenan PA. Successful migraine prophylaxis with naproxen sodium. Neurology. 1985;35(9):1304–1310 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101. Sargent J, Solbach P, Damasio H, et al. A comparison of naproxen sodium to propranolol hydrochloride and a placebo control for the prophylaxis of migraine headache. Headache. 1985;25(6):320–324 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102. Ziegler DK, Ellis DJ. Naproxen in prophylaxis of migraine. Arch Neurol. 1985;42(6):582–584 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103. Bigal ME, Lipton RB. Excessive acute migraine medication use and migraine progression. Neurology. 2008;71(22):1821–1828 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104. GlaxoSmithKline Pregnancy Registries, Sumatriptan/Naratriptan/Treximet Pregnancy Registry, http://pregnancyregistry.gsk.com/sumatriptan.html; accessed Feb 19, 2012
  • 105. Goadsby PJ, Yates R. Zolmitriptan intranasal: a review of the pharmacokinetics and clinical efficacy. Headache. 2006;46:138–149 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106. Baden EY, Hunter CJ. Intravenous dexamethasone to prevent the recurrence of benign headache after discharge from the emergency department: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial. CJEM. November 2006;8(6):393–400 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Neurohospitalist are provided here courtesy of SAGE Publications

RESOURCES