Skip to main content
Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery logoLink to Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery
. 2011 Nov 5;65(Suppl 2):216–219. doi: 10.1007/s12070-011-0324-5

Use of Intravenous Steroids at Induction of Anesthesia for Septoplasty to Reduce Post-Operative Nausea and Vomiting and Pain: A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial

Ali Eftekharian 1, Navid Ahmady Roozbahany 2,
PMCID: PMC3738800  PMID: 24427649

Abstract

To determine the effectiveness of dexamethasone to reduce pain, nausea and vomiting after septoplasty. Study is a prospective double-blind randomized controlled trial. A total of 90 patients were enrolled and received an either of dexamethasone or placebo in the induction of anesthesia. The patients were asked to note the level of pain on the visual analogue scale in the first 24 h after surgery. They also had to record their severity of nausea and number of vomiting attacks. There were statistically significant differences between the two groups for the level of pain noted on the visual analogue scale. The severity of nausea was lower after treatment with dexamethasone but the difference between two groups was not significant. There was also a significant decrease in the number of vomiting attacks in patients treated with dexamethasone. A single dose of 8 mg of dexamethasone, given intravenously, at induction of anesthesia for septoplasty significantly decreased the pain, post-operative nausea and vomiting for the day of operation.

Keywords: Septoplasty, Post-operative pain, Nausea and vomiting, Dexamethasone, Steroids

Introduction

Septoplasty is a common procedure and post-operative pain, nausea and vomiting is sometimes troublesome. The idea of using dexamethasone to reduce pain, nausea and vomiting after surgery comes from its successful use for reducing post-operative morbidity of tonsillectomy and dental procedures [1].

Analgesic effects of dexamethasone are secondary to its anti-inflammatory potentials. It is also believed that inhibition of inflammatory mediators, leads to suppression of central mechanisms of nausea and vomiting [1].

The incidence of post-operative nausea and vomiting is reported to be about 70 percent in ear, nose and throat (ENT) cases. Post-operative pain and PONV are separate entities, anyway, the anxiety produced by pain, may lead to initiation or deterioration of PONV [1]. This is why in most studies these two topics are approached together.

Evidences suggest that a single dose of dexamethasone is a safe and effective treatment for reducing post-operative morbidities [1, 2]; but there is a lack of studies for evaluation of the effects of dexamethasone in septoplasty. In fact, there is no study that we are aware of that look specifically at the effect of dexamethasone on post-operative pain scores and PONV after septoplasty.

We decided to measure post-operative pain scores and incidence of PONV after septoplasty. We believe that measuring of pain scores, will give a truer reflection of the subjective feeling of patients.

Materials and Methods

This is a double-blind, randomized, prospective trial. Ninety consecutive patients, who met the inclusion criteria and were scheduled to undergo elective septoplasty under general anesthesia, entered the study. Exclusion criteria were presence of physical or mental comorbidities, cases of reoperation and presence of a sinonasal disease that imposes an additive work on septoplasty (such as middle turbinate concha bullosa or severely hypertrophied turbinates). Patients were allocated according to a randomly generated number sequence to the control group who received 2 ml of normal saline intravenously at induction of anesthesia and the trial group who received 8 mg (2 ml) of dexamethasone intravenously at induction of anesthesia. Neither patient, nor surgeon, nor researcher knew whether the patient had received dexamethasone. The consistent anesthetic technique involved induction with thiopental sodium 5 mg/kg, atracurium 0.5 mg/kg and dexamethasone 8 mg or normal saline. The patient was then intubated. Intermittent positive pressure ventilation with oxygen in 50% nitrous oxide with isoflurane was then used. A submucoperichondrial resection and repair technique was used for septoplasty. The operations were done by different surgeons. Post-operative regimen for analgesia was not given routinely and 500 mg Acetaminophen tablets was given on demand of patients. Post-operatively, the patients were asked to complete a questionnaire. A visual analogue score of 0–100 was use for estimating the subjective degree of pain 5, 12 and 24 h post-operatively. The patients asked to report the severity of nausea (none, minimal, moderate and severe), number of vomiting attacks in first 24 h after surgery. With regards to pain; the result of a single sided power calculation shows that for a decrease of ten point on a visual analogue scale of 0–100, each sample group should contain at least 30 patients to provide power of 80% at a significance level of 0.05 (95%). With regards to PONV, the χ2 test requires at least 20 patients in total for the test to have significance.

Statistical analysis was carried out using SPSS 15.0 package. The χ2 test was used to test for the significance of the incidence of PONV. The unpaired Student’s t test was used to establish the significance of the results regarding the post-operative pain scores.

Results

Ninety patients (68 male and 22 female) were enrolled in the study. There were no obvious basic demographical differences between patients of case and control groups (Tables 1, 2). No adverse effects from dexamethasone were reported.

Table 1.

Gender of patients in case and control groups

Dexamethasone Gender Total
Male Female
Yes 35 10 45
77.8% 22.2% 100.0%
No 33 12 45
73.3% 26.7% 100.0%
Total 68 22 90
75.6% 24.4% 100.0%

Table 2.

Age of patients is case and control groups

Age
Dexamethasone Mean N Std. deviation
Yes 28.96 45 10.952
No 27.78 45 8.697
Total 28.37 90 9.851

In hour 5 post-operative, 86.7% of cases and 95.4 of controls had nausea. These values were 84.4 and 95.4 for hour 12 and 71.1 and 93.3 for hour 24 respectively.

The details about sensation of nausea in post-operative hours 5, 12 and 24 are shown in Tables 3, 4 and 5. These data show a trend toward effectiveness of dexamethasone for reducing of post-operative nausea, but the difference was not statistically significant.

Table 3.

Post-operative nausea in hour 5

Nausea in 5 h Total
No Mild Moderate Severe
Dexamethasone Yes Count 6 29 9 1 45
% 13.30 64.40 20.00 2.20 100.00
No Count 2 27 14 2 45
% 4.40 60.00 31.10 4.40 100.00
Total Count 8 56 23 3 90
% 8.90 62.20 25.60 3.30 100.00

Table 4.

Post-operative nausea in hour 12

Nausea in 12 h Total
No Mild Moderate Severe
Dexamethasone Yes Count 7 24 13 1 45
% 15.60 53.30 28.90 2.20 100.00
No Count 2 19 20 4 45
% 4.40 42.20 44.40 8.90 100.00
Total Count 9 43 33 5 90
% 10.00 47.80 36.70 5.60 100.00

Table 5.

Post-operative nausea in hour 24

Nausea in 24 h Total
No Mild Moderate Severe
Dexamethasone Yes Count 13 18 13 1 45
% 28.90 40.00 28.90 2.20 100.00
No Count 3 18 21 3 45
% 6.70 40.00 46.70 6.70 100.00
Total Count 16 36 34 4 90
% 17.80 40.00 37.80 4.40 100.00

There was a statistically significant higher frequency of vomiting in control group (Table 6).

Table 6.

Number of vomiting attacks in first post-operative day (P < 0.005)

Dexamethasone N Mean Std. deviation Std. error mean
Vomiting Yes 45 0.4889 0.69486 0.10358
No 45 0.9778 1.82768 0.27245

Post-operatively, there was no significant difference between the groups in the time taken before first ingestion of food or drink and the consumption of analgesics was not statistically different in two groups in post-operative hours 5, 12 and 24.

On the day of the operation the mean pain score was 10.3 out of 100 in the control group, compared with 7.4 in the trial group. This is a statistically significant relative decrease in pain, with a P value < 0.005 (Table 7).

Table 7.

Pain in post-operative hours 5, 12 and 24

Dexamethasone Pain after 5 h Pain after 12 h Pain after 24 h
Yes Mean 20.22 10.33 7.44
Std. deviation 17.547 9.909 5.802
No Mean 37.11 21.22 10.33
Std. deviation 16.393 10.344 6.519
Total Mean 28.67 15.78 8.89
Std. deviation 18.899 11.463 6.306

Discussion

Steroids have several physiological actions. They include anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressive actions along with effects on metabolism, electrolyte and water balance, skeletal muscle, the cardiovascular system, the central nervous system and blood elements [3, 4]. They exert their effect by altering gene expression after binding specific intracellular receptors that then, blocking formation of some substances and accelerating production of others. Clinical effects take time to become apparent because time is required for this gene transcription and protein synthesis to take place [5].

Surgeons use steroids because of their anti-inflammatory actions. These are mediated by inhibition of production of inflammatory factors such as cytokines in macrophages, monocytes, and lymphocytes. These effects result in decreased extravasation of leukocytes, release of lysosomal enzymes and vascular permeability in areas of injury [5, 6]. This reduces edema. There is also ultimately decreased fibrosis during healing [5].

Complications of steroid use are dose related, and a single dose of glucocorticoid is “virtually without harmful effects” [7].

The mechanism of effect of dexamethasone is not well understood. It may be effects on outside of the blood brain barrier (area postrena of brainstem) or inside the blood–brain barrier and vomiting centre [1]. Dexamethasone may also reduce inflammation at the operative site, thereby reducing the release of inflammatory mediators into the circulation. This would lead to a lesser stimulation of the vomiting centre. However, as yet, there is no evidence to support this as a mode of action [1, 2].

The results of this study confirmed the benefits of single dose of dexamethasone in reducing of post-operative pain and PONV after septoplasty. The mean pain scores are relatively low and this means that there is no need for routine post-operative analgesics. Anyway, dexamethasone can be assumed as a safe and effective treatment for post-operative nausea and vomiting.

Conclusions

This study has shown a single dose of 8 mg of dexamethasone, given intravenously, at induction of anesthesia for septoplasty significantly decreased the pain scores for the day of operation. Post-operative nausea and vomiting was also reduced significantly for the day of operation. There may be economic benefits because of reduced need for analgesia and anti-emetics. There were no adverse effects from dexamethasone seen.

References

  • 1.Elhakim M, et al. Dexamethasone reduces postoperative vomiting and pain after pediatric tonsillectomy. Can J Anesth. 2003;50:392–397. doi: 10.1007/BF03021038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Stewart R, et al. Dexamethason reduces pain after tonsillectomy in adults. Clin Otolaryngol. 2002;7:321–327. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2273.2002.00588.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Liu K, et al. Effect of dexamethasone on postoperative emesis and pain. Br J Anaesth. 1998;80:85–86. doi: 10.1093/bja/80.1.85. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Kaygusuz I, Susaman N. The effects of Dexamethasone, bupivacain and topical lidocain spray on pain after tonsillectomy. Int J Pediatr Ontolaryngol. 2003;67:737–742. doi: 10.1016/S0165-5876(03)00091-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Tewary AK, Cable HR, Barr GS. Steroids and control of post tonsillectomy pain. J Laryngol Otol. 1993;107:605–606. doi: 10.1017/S0022215100123837. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Catlin FI, Grimes WJ. The effect of steroid therapy on recovery from tonsillectomy in children. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1991;117:649–652. doi: 10.1001/archotol.1991.01870180085016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Furst SR, Rodarte A. Prophylactic antiemetic treatment with ondansetron in children undergoing tonsillectomy. Anesthesiology. 1994;81:799–803. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199410000-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES