It is well established that the health of mothers can influence the health of their offspring. This can occur as a result of the transfer of viruses or toxins via the placenta or the milk, a compromised nutrient supply to the embryo or abnormal behavioural interactions between mother and offspring.1 However, examples of paternal health affecting the next generation are rare. A recent paper published in Nature by Ng et al.,2 shows that an acquired disease in male rats can lead to abnormalities in the next generation. Similar trangenerational effects down the male line have been reported in rats following the administration of particular drugs.3 However, in the study by Ng and colleagues the trigger was the ‘over-administration' of a major component of our natural diet, and the disease itself is common throughout the world, making the findings particularly interesting.
Male rats were fed a high fat diet (HFD) that, as expected, led to increased body weight and adiposity, impaired glucose sensitivity and insulin sensitivity. These obese males, and lean males that had been fed a control diet, were then mated with females that had only had the control diet. The offspring (F1) of the two groups were subjected to a variety of metric, metabolic and histological tests. The female offspring of HFD fathers, when compared to those of control fathers, displayed impaired insulin secretion and glucose tolerance, and significant changes to the pancreatic islets of Langerhans. Furthermore, microarray analyses revealed extensive gene expression changes in the pancreatic islets of females with HFD fathers.
Care was taken to house the males with the females for a limited period of time. In fact they spent only 8 days together. Removal of the fathers before the offspring were born greatly reduces the possibility of paternal behaviour being the cause of the offspring's pancreas abnormalities. Therefore, the mechanism of inheritance can be narrowed down to a change in sperm or seminal plasma factors. While this reasoning significantly reduces the possible molecular causes of the phenotype, there are still several possibilities (see Figure 1).
Figure 1.

Changes in obese male semen that could alter offspring phenotype.
The DNA methylation patterns in mature spermatozoa are as unique as any other terminally differentiated tissue. These patterns are erased shortly after fertilisation in a genome-wide epigenetic reprogramming event.4, 5, 6 This reduces the likelihood of any abnormal DNA methylation being able to direct abnormal expression patterns in the next generation. However, certain regions are protected or are resistant to post-fertilisation demethylation events. These include genomic/parental imprints7, 8 and the mouse intracisternal A-type particle retrotransposons.9 Ng and colleagues discovered that the gene with the greatest change in expression in the pancreatic islets of females with HFD fathers, Il13ra2, has an associated DNA methylation change at its promoter. This does implicate epigenetics in the offspring phenotype but characterisation of the DNA methylation status of this region in the sperm of the obese rats and in the offspring at the preimplantation stage would be required for it to be considered the causative inherited factor.
Recent discoveries into the chromatin and RNA of spermatozoa provide other possible mechanisms for the paternal effect. While the majority of DNA in sperm is packed in protamines, a small fraction, between 2 and 15% depending on the species, is bound by nucleohistones. The nucleohistones retain transcription-regulating modifications such as acetylation of lysine residues, and these epigenetic marks are believed to prime genes for expression in early embryonic development.10, 11 A perturbation of these marks in the sperm of obese males could therefore impact offspring development. Secondly, despite the fact that the amount of RNA contributed to the zygote by the sperm is dwarfed by that from the oocyte, there is growing evidence that sperm-borne mRNA and microRNA can influence offspring phenotypes even into adulthood.12, 13
Obesity is thought to increase DNA damage in sperm through a variety of mechanisms such as increasing reactive oxygen species levels, by affecting normal spermatogenesis through increased testes temperature or altered hormone levels, or by increasing levels of fat-soluble toxins.14, 15 Indeed, sperm from mice fed a HFD have been reported to have an increase in reactive oxygen species levels and DNA damage.16 Unlike epigenetic marks, DNA mutations are permanent and could be responsible for the offspring's pancreatic abnormalities. However, the sperm genome would presumably be mutated at random, and it is hard to reconcile this with such a high incidence of one particular abnormality in the offspring.
Finally, changes to pancreas function and morphology similar to those seen by Ng and colleagues have also been seen in the offspring of obese mothers.17 This may be a clue that points to the paternal obesity mechanism imitating the changes in embryo demand/maternal supply of nutrition that are seen with obese mothers. Genetic or epigenetic changes in sperm that go on to alter embryonic nutrient demand, or seminal plasma factors18 that alter gestational nutrient exchange could therefore be responsible.
The lesser contribution of males than females to prenatal development makes study of transgenerational disease easier to dissect when it is down the male line. However, there are still several potential routes for disease transmission and much to be done to determine which of the changes is responsible.
Acknowledgments
We wish to thank Madeleine Kersting, Graphic Support, Queensland Institute of Medical Research for producing the figure.
References
- Youngson NA, Whitelaw E. Transgenerational epigenetic effects. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet. 2008;9:233–57. doi: 10.1146/annurev.genom.9.081307.164445. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ng SF, Lin RC, Laybutt DR, Barres R, Owens JA, et al. Chronic high-fat diet in fathers programs beta-cell dysfunction in female rat offspring. Nature. 2010;467:963–6. doi: 10.1038/nature09491. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Anway MD, Leathers C, Skinner MK. Endocrine disruptor vinclozolin induced epigenetic transgenerational adult-onset disease. Endocrinology. 2006;147:5515–23. doi: 10.1210/en.2006-0640. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mayer W, Niveleau A, Walter J, Fundele R, Haaf T. Demethylation of the zygotic paternal genome. Nature. 2000;403:501–2. doi: 10.1038/35000656. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Oswald J, Engemann S, Lane N, Mayer W, Olek A, et al. Active demethylation of the paternal genome in the mouse zygote. Curr Biol. 2000;10:475–8. doi: 10.1016/s0960-9822(00)00448-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rougier N, Bourc'his D, Gomes DM, Niveleau A, Plachot M, et al. Chromosome methylation patterns during mammalian preimplantation development. Genes Dev. 1998;12:2108–13. doi: 10.1101/gad.12.14.2108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Olek A, Walter J. The pre-implantation ontogeny of the H19 methylation imprint. Nat Genet. 1997;17:275–6. doi: 10.1038/ng1197-275. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tremblay KD, Saam JR, Ingram RS, Tilghman SM, Bartolomei MS. A paternal-specific methylation imprint marks the alleles of the mouse H19 gene. Nat Genet. 1995;9:407–13. doi: 10.1038/ng0495-407. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lane N, Dean W, Erhardt S, Hajkova P, Surani A, et al. Resistance of IAPs to methylation reprogramming may provide a mechanism for epigenetic inheritance in the mouse. Genesis. 2003;35:88–93. doi: 10.1002/gene.10168. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hammoud SS, Nix DA, Zhang H, Purwar J, Carrell DT, et al. Distinctive chromatin in human sperm packages genes for embryo development. Nature. 2009;460:473–8. doi: 10.1038/nature08162. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Arpanahi A, Brinkworth M, Iles D, Krawetz SA, Paradowska A, et al. Endonuclease-sensitive regions of human spermatozoal chromatin are highly enriched in promoter and CTCF binding sequences. Genome Res. 2009;19:1338–49. doi: 10.1101/gr.094953.109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Krawetz SA. Paternal contribution: new insights and future challenges. Nat Rev Genet. 2005;6:633–42. doi: 10.1038/nrg1654. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rassoulzadegan M, Cuzin F. The making of an organ: RNA mediated developmental controls in mice. Organogenesis. 2010;6:33–6. doi: 10.4161/org.6.1.11094. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Du Plessis SS, Cabler S, McAlister DA, Sabanegh E, Agarwal A. The effect of obesity on sperm disorders and male infertility. Nat Rev Urol. 2010;7:153–61. doi: 10.1038/nrurol.2010.6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sharpe RM. Environmental/lifestyle effects on spermatogenesis. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2010;365:1697–712. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2009.0206. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bakos HW, Mitchell M, Setchell BP, Lane M.The effect of paternal diet-induced obesity on sperm function and fertilization in a mouse model. Int J Androle-pub ahead of print 23 July 2010; doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2605.2010.01092.x. [DOI] [PubMed]
- Drake AJ, Reynolds RM. Impact of maternal obesity on offspring obesity and cardiometabolic disease risk. Reproduction. 2010;140:387–98. doi: 10.1530/REP-10-0077. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Robertson SA. Seminal plasma and male factor signalling in the female reproductive tract. Cell Tissue Res. 2005;322:43–52. doi: 10.1007/s00441-005-1127-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
