Skip to main content
The BMJ logoLink to The BMJ
. 2001 Aug 18;323(7309):376–377. doi: 10.1136/bmj.323.7309.376

Antenatal detection of HIV: national surveillance and unlinked anonymous survey

Susan Cliffe a, Pat A Tookey b, Angus Nicoll a
PMCID: PMC37399  PMID: 11509430

In 1999 national targets were adopted for the universal offer and recommendation of a test for HIV during antenatal care throughout England.1 This built on earlier initiatives aimed at enhancing maternal diagnosis of HIV infection and reducing perinatal transmission of HIV with appropriate interventions.2 Substantial improvement in the proportion of maternal HIV infections diagnosed has been reported for much of London, and improvement has been observed more recently for the rest of England.3 We used published estimates of rates of vertical transmission of HIV in the United Kingdom to assess whether the target of an 80% reduction in the proportion of vertically infected infants by December 2002 is likely to be achieved.1

Participants, methods, and results

We used results from the unlinked anonymous dried blood spot survey to estimate the number of births in England to women infected with HIV.3 Combining these data with confidential reports of pregnancies in women diagnosed as being infected with HIV made through the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists to the national study of HIV in pregnancy and childhood allowed us to estimate the proportion of maternal infections diagnosed before delivery. We used data from 1997 to reflect the baseline situation before the implementation of national antenatal HIV testing and data from 1999 to investigate recent improvements in rates of maternal diagnosis.

To estimate the number of babies acquiring HIV infection from their mothers we assumed a vertical transmission rate of 2.2% for women whose infection was diagnosed before delivery and 26.5% for women whose infection was not diagnosed.4,5 To calculate the minimum number of infected babies achievable we assumed diagnosis of all maternal infections before delivery and a vertical transmission rate of 2.2%. The vertical transmission rate for women with diagnosed infection was based on British surveillance data for 1997, when 62% of women with diagnosed infection had their babies delivered by caesarean section and 97% accepted some antiretroviral treatment.4

In 1997 infection was diagnosed and reported for 82 of the estimated 275 women infected with HIV who gave birth in England. We estimate that 53 babies were likely to have been infected (three born to women with a diagnosis and 50 to women without a diagnosis), and that 47 (89%) of these infections were preventable (minimum number achievable=6) (table).

The recent improvement in the proportion of maternal HIV infections diagnosed before delivery in England (particularly in London) reflects an increase in the number of women with a previous diagnosis becoming pregnant as well as an improvement in rates of antenatal diagnosis. Although there were more births to infected women in 1999 than in 1997, the increasing proportion of maternal infections diagnosed before delivery is likely to have led to fewer infants acquiring infection (table). Although nearly three quarters of pregnant women infected with HIV live in London, rates of diagnosis must improve throughout the country if the target for reduction in paediatric infection is to be reached. Even if all infected women in London had had a diagnosis in 1999 there would still have been 26 babies born with HIV infection in England as a whole (20+6), a reduction of 51% from the 1997 baseline of 53 (table).

Comment

Achieving the national target of an 80% reduction in paediatric HIV infections depends on improving rates of diagnosis outside London as well as sustaining and further improving them in London. Most pregnant women infected with HIV live in London, and improvements in rates of antenatal diagnosis in this region have already had an impact in reducing transmission of HIV from mother to child. Recent data for the first half of 2000 indicate that rates of antenatal detection outside London have increased substantially as routine antenatal testing has been implemented,3 and this should result in further reductions in the proportion of infected infants.

Supplementary Material

[extra: Details of methods]

Table.

Estimated number of babies in England acquiring HIV infection from their mothers and number of these infections that were preventable (1997 and 1999)

1997
1999
London Rest of England Total London Rest of England Total
Births to women infected with HIV* 200 75 275 262 98 360
Maternal HIV infections diagnosed before pregnancy 45 10 55 90 19 109
Maternal HIV infections diagnosed during pregnancy 25  2 27 81  6  87
Percentage of maternal HIV infections diagnosed before delivery 35 16 30 65 26  54
Estimated number of babies who acquired HIV infection from their mothers (95% CI) 36 (27 to 47) 17 (13 to 21) 53 (41 to 68) 28 (19 to 42) 20 (15 to 25) 48 (34 to 67)
Estimated minimum number of infected babies achievable§  4  2  6  6  2   8
*

Data obtained from the unlinked anonymous programme and adjusted for areas not covered by the survey. 

Confidential reports of HIV positive pregnancies made through the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists and confirmed by April 2001. 

Assuming vertical transmission rates of 2.2% (95% CI 0% to 7.8%) for infections diagnosed before or during pregnancy4 and 26.5% (21.1% to 31.1%) for infections not diagnosed before delivery.5 As these rates are estimates for the United Kingdom and the risk of HIV infection is heterogeneous, the number of infected babies will be an overestimate or an underestimate when expressed by subregion. 

§

Assuming all infections are diagnosed before delivery and a vertical transmission rate of 2.2%. We assumed, on the basis of observed data for 1997 and 1998 from the national study of HIV in pregnancy, that 9% of women whose infection is diagnosed during pregnancy would opt to terminate the pregnancy. 

Acknowledgments

We thank obstetric and paediatric respondents to the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists and British Paediatric Surveillance Unit schemes and colleagues at the Institute of Child Health, Public Health Laboratory Service, and Scottish Centre for Infection and Environmental Health, Glasgow.

Footnotes

Funding: Department of Health. The views expressed are those of the authors and not of the Department of Health.

Competing interests: None declared.

Details of methods are on the BMJ's website

References

  • 1.UK Health Departments. Targets aimed at reducing the number of children born with HIV: report from an expert group. London: Stationery Office; 1999. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Intercollegiate Working Party. London: Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health; 1998. Reducing mother to child transmission of HIV infection in the United Kingdom—Executive summary and recommendations. . (Recommendations of an intercollegiate working party for enhancing voluntary confidential HIV testing in pregnancy.) [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Communicable Disease Surveillance Centre, Scottish Centre for Infection and Environmental Health, Institute of Child Health (London), Oxford Haemophilia Centre. AIDS and HIV-1 infection in the United Kingdom: monthly report (HIV infection in pregnant women giving birth in the UK—levels of infection and proportions diagnosed). Commun Dis Report 2001:11(8). www.phls.co.uk/publications (accessed July 2001).
  • 4.Duong T, Ades A, Gibb D, Tookey P, Masters J. Vertical transmission rates for HIV in the British Isles: estimates based on surveillance data. BMJ. 1999;319:1227–1229. doi: 10.1136/bmj.319.7219.1227. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Ratcliffe J, Ades AE, Gibb DM, Sculpher MJ, Briggs A. Prevention of mother-to-child transmission of HIV infection: alternative strategies and their cost-effectiveness. AIDS. 1998;12:1381–1388. doi: 10.1097/00002030-199811000-00021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

[extra: Details of methods]

Articles from BMJ : British Medical Journal are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES